Patent Grant
8357420
The present invention is directed to oil-in-water (o/w) emulsions. In particular, the present invention is directed to oil-in-water emulsions that are resistant to oxidisation.
A wide variety of consumer goods contain oil-in-water emulsions including cosmetic preparations (eg skin creams, moisturisers, lotions, and hair and skin conditioning agents) and food products (eg dressings, ice creams, mayonnaises, spreads and sauces). The physio-chemical properties of the emulsions are critical for ensuring consumer acceptance of these products and furthermore the stability of the emulsion and of the ingredients therein is vital for ensuring the shelf-life of such products.
There are a number of mechanisms that degrade the quality of a product comprising an oil-in-water emulsion. Flocculation is the process by which particles in the emulsion are caused to clump together which may then float to the top of the continuous phase or settle to the bottom of the continuous phase. Creaming is the migration of a substance in an emulsion, under the influence of buoyancy, to the top of a sample while the particles of the substance remain separated. Breaking and coalescence is where the particles coalesce and form a layer within the continuous phase. Unstable emulsions are particularly susceptible to these mechanisms and suffer a break down in the physio-chemical structure of the emulsion and the loss of the beneficial properties required by consumers. The quality of a product comprising an oil-in-water emulsion can be further affected through the degradation of the oil. Oxidation is one such process that may cause degradation and can lead to rancidity and the loss of important functional ingredients. European Patent Application published as EP 1 978 824 discloses an aerated composition having an overrun of at least 10% and comprising water and an emulsified fat phase wherein the composition comprises hydrophobin. Examples 1 to 4 of EP 1 978 824 comprise Olive Oil which is notorious for its sensitivity to oxidisation. There therefore remains a need for oil-in-water emulsions with improved shelf-lives that are resistant to oxidisation of oil therein.
Tests and Definitions
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art (eg colloid chemistry).
Oil
As used herein the term “oil” is used as a generic term for lipids, fats, or any mixture thereof, either pure or containing compounds in solution. Oils can also contain particles in suspension.
Lipids
As used herein the term “lipids” is used as a generic term for long chain fatty acids or long chain alcohols wherein the term “long chain” is used as a generic term for 12 carbon atoms or more.
Fats
As used herein the term “fats” is used as a generic term for compounds containing more than 80% triglycerides. They can also contain diglycerides, monoglycerides and free fatty acids. In common language, liquid fats are often referred to as oils but herein the term fats is also used as a generic term for such liquid fats. Fats include: plant oils (for example: Apricot Kernel Oil, Arachis Oil, Arnica Oil, Argan Oil, Avocado Oil, Babassu Oil, Baobab Oil, Black Seed Oil, Blackberry Seed Oil, Blackcurrant Seed Oil, Blueberry Seed Oil, Borage Oil, Calendula Oil, Camelina Oil, Camellia Seed Oil, Castor Oil, Cherry Kernel Oil, Cocoa Butter, Coconut Oil, Corn Oil, Cottonseed Oil, Evening Primrose Oil, Grapefruit Oil, Grapeseed. Oil, Hazelnut Oil, Hempseed Oil, Jojoba Oil, Lemon Seed Oil, Lime Seed Oil, Linseed Oil, Kukui Nut Oil, Macadamia Oil, Maize Oil, Mango Butter, Meadowfoam Oil, Melon Seed Oil, Moring a Oil, Olive Oil, Orange Seed Oil, Palm Oil, Papaya Seed Oil, Passion Seed Oil, Peach Kernel Oil, Plum Oil, Pomegranate Seed Oil, Poppy Seed Oil, Pumpkins Seed Oil, Rapeseed (or Canola) Oil, Red Raspberry Seed Oil, Rice Bran Oil, Rosehip Oil, Safflower Oil, Seabuckthorn Oil, Sesame Oil, Soyabean Oil, Strawberry Seed Oil, Sunflower Oil, Sweet. Almond Oil, Walnut Oil, Wheat Germ Oil); fish oils (for example: Sardine Oil, Mackerel Oil, Herring Oil, Cod-liver Oil, Oyster Oil); animal oils (for example: Conjugated Linoleic Acid); or other oils (for example: Paraffinic Oils, Naphthenic Oils, Aromatic Oils, Silicone Oils); or any mixture thereof.
Iodine Value
As used herein the term “iodine value” is used as a generic term for the measure of the unsaturation of oil and is expressed in terms of the number of centigrammes of iodine absorbed per gramme of sample (% iodine absorbed). The higher the iodine number, the more unsaturated double bonds are present in oil and hence the more prone the oil is to oxidisation via the double bond. Iodine value is determined using the Wijs Method as provided in the American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS) Official Method Tg 1a-64, pages 1-2, Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists' Society, Second Edition, edited by D. Firestone, AOCS Press; Champaign, 1990, method Revised 1990).
Calculation of Ratio of Hydrophobin to Oil
As used herein the term “ratio of hydrophobin to oil” is defined as the mass of hydrophobin (in grammes) relative to the volume of the oil (in litres) in the oil-in-water emulsion. The ratio of hydrophobin to oil is therefore expressed as:
Total mass of Hydrophobin in emulsion (grammes):Total volume of oil in emulsion (litres)=g/litre
Calculation of Ratio of Oil to Water
As used herein the term “ratio of oil to water” is defined as the volume of oil (in millilitres) relative to the volume of the water (in millilitres) in the oil-in-water emulsion. The ratio of oil to water is therefore expressed as:
(Total volume of oil in emulsion (millilitres)/Total volume of water in emulsion (millilitres))×100=v/v %
Oil-in-Water Emulsion
As used herein the term “oil-in-water emulsion” is used as a generic term for a mixture of two immiscible phases wherein an oil (dispersed phase) is dispersed in an aqueous solution (the continuous phase).
Food Products
As used herein the term “food products” is used as a generic term for products and ingredients taken by the mouth, the constituents of which are active in and/or absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract with the purpose of nourishment of the body and its tissues, refreshment and indulgence, which products are to be marketed and sold to customers for consumption by humans. Examples of food products are tea, including precursors thereof; spreads; ice cream; frozen fruits and vegetables; snacks including diet foods and beverages; condiments; dressings; and culinary aids. Food products may particularly bring any of the following benefits: healthy metabolism; life span extension; optimal growth and development; optimal gastrointestinal tract function; avoidance of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance; avoidance of dyslipidemias; weight control; healthy mineral metabolism; immune health; optimal eye health; avoidance of cognitive impairment and memory loss; hair and skin health; beauty; and excellent taste and smell.
Spreads
As used herein the term “spreads” is used as a generic term for oil and water, containing emulsion, for instance a margarine type spread. Advantageously a spread has a pH of 4.8-6.0. The pH can be measured by melting the spread, separating the molten fat phase from the water phase and measuring the pH of the water phase.
Spreads of the invention may comprise other ingredients commonly used for spreads, such as flavouring ingredients, thickeners, gellation agents, colouring agents, vitamins, emulsifiers, pH regulators, stabilizers etc. Common amounts of such ingredients as well as suitable ways to prepare margarines or spreads are well-known to the skilled person.
Dressings
As used herein the term “dressings” is used as a generic term for oil and water containing emulsion, for instance vinaigrette and salad-dressing type compositions.
Aeration
The term “aerated” means that gas has been intentionally incorporated into the product, such as by mechanical means. The gas can be any gas, but is preferably, particularly in the context of food products, a food-grade gas such as air, nitrogen or carbon dioxide. The extent of aeration is typically defined in terms of “overrun”. In the context of the present invention, % overrun is defined in volume terms as:
Overrun=((volume of the final aerated product−volume of the mix)/volume of the mix)×100
The amount of overrun present in the product will vary depending on the desired product characteristics. For example, the level of overrun in confectionery such as mousses can be as high as 200 to 250%. The level of overrun in some chilled products, ambient products and hot products can be lower, but generally over 10%, e.g. the level of overrun in milkshakes is typically from 10 to 40%.
Hydrophobins
Hydrophobins are a well-defined class of proteins (Wessels, 1997, Adv. Microb. Physio. 38: 1-45; Wosten, 2001, Annu Rev. Microbiol. 55: 625-646) capable of self-assembly at a hydrophobidhydrophilic interface, and having a conserved sequence:
where X represents any amino acid, and n and m independently represent an integer. Typically, a hydrophobin has a length of up to 125 amino acids. The cysteine residues (C) in the conserved sequence are part of disulphide bridges. In the context of the present invention, the term hydrophobin has a wider meaning to include functionally equivalent proteins still displaying the characteristic of self-assembly at a hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface resulting in a protein film, such as proteins comprising the sequence:
or parts thereof still displaying the characteristic of self-assembly at a hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface resulting in a protein film. In accordance with the definition of the present invention, self-assembly can be detected by adsorbing the protein to Teflon and using Circular Dichroism to establish the presence of a secondary structure (in general, a-helix) (De Vocht et al., 1998, Biophys. J. 74: 2059-68).
The formation of a film can be established by incubating a Teflon sheet in the protein solution followed by at least three washes with water or buffer (Wosten et al., 1994, Embo. J. 13: 5848-54). The protein film can be visualised by any suitable method, such as labeling with a fluorescent marker or by the use of fluorescent antibodies, as is well established in the art. m and n typically have values ranging from 0 to 2000, but more usually m and n in total are less than 100 or 200. The definition of hydrophobin in the context of the present invention includes fusion proteins of a hydrophobin and another polypeptide as well as conjugates of hydrophobin and other molecules such as polysaccharides.
Hydrophobins identified to date are generally classed as either class I or class II. Both types have been identified in fungi as secreted proteins that self-assemble at hydrophobilic interfaces into amphipathic films. Assemblages of class I hydrophobins are relatively insoluble whereas those of class II hydrophobins readily dissolve in a variety of solvents.
Hydrophobin-like proteins have also been identified in filamentous bacteria, such as Actinomycete and Steptomyces sp. (WO01/74864). These bacterial proteins, by contrast to fungal hydrophobins, form only up to one disulphide bridge since they have only two cysteine residues. Such proteins are an example of functional equivalents to hydrophobins having the consensus sequences shown in SEQ ID Nos. 1 and 2, and are within the scope of the present invention.
The hydrophobins can be obtained by extraction from native sources, such as filamentous fungi, by any suitable process. For example, hydrophobins can be obtained by culturing filamentous fungi that secrete the hydrophobin into the growth medium or by extraction from fungal mycelia with 60% ethanol. It is particularly preferred to isolate hydrophobins from host organisms that naturally secrete hydrophobins. Preferred hosts are hyphomycetes (e.g. Trichoderma), basidiomycetes and ascomycetes. Particularly preferred hosts are food grade organisms, such as Cryphonectria parasitica which secretes a hydrophobin termed cryparin (MacCabe and Van Alfen, 1999, App. Environ. Microbiol 65: 5431-5435).
Alternatively, hydrophobins can be obtained by the use of recombinant technology. For example host cells, typically micro-organisms, may be modified to express hydrophobins and the hydrophobins can then be isolated and used in accordance with the present invention. Techniques for introducing nucleic acid constructs encoding hydrophobins into host cells are well known in the art. More than 34 genes coding for hydrophobins have been cloned, from over 16 fungal species (see for example WO96/41882 which gives the sequence of hydrophobins identified in Agaricus bisporus; and Wosten, 2001, Annu Rev. Microbiol. 55: 625-646). Recombinant technology can also be used to modify hydrophobin sequences or synthesise novel hydrophobins having desired/improved properties.
Typically, an appropriate host cell or organism is transformed by a nucleic acid construct that encodes the desired hydrophobin. The nucleotide sequence coding for the polypeptide can be inserted into a suitable expression vector encoding the necessary elements for transcription and translation and in such a manner that they will be expressed under appropriate conditions (e.g. in proper orientation and correct reading frame and with appropriate targeting and expression sequences). The methods required to construct these expression vectors are well known to those skilled in the art.
A number of expression systems may be used to express the polypeptide coding sequence. These include, but are not limited to, bacteria, fungi (including yeast), insect cell systems, plant cell culture systems and plants all transformed with the appropriate expression vectors. Preferred hosts are those that are considered food grade—‘generally regarded as safe’ (GRAS).
Suitable fungal species, include yeasts such as (but not limited to) those of the genera Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces, Pichia, Hansenula, Candida, Schizosaccharomyces and the like, and filamentous species such as (but not limited to) those of the genera Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Mucor, Neurospora, Fusarium and the like.
The sequences encoding the hydrophobins are preferably at least 80% identical at the amino acid level to a hydrophobin identified in nature, more preferably at least 95% or 100% identical. However, persons skilled in the art may make conservative substitutions or other amino acid changes that do not reduce the biological activity of the hydrophobin. For the purpose of the invention these hydrophobins possessing this high level of identity to a hydrophobin that naturally occurs are also embraced within the term “hydrophobins”.
Hydrophobins can be purified from culture media or cellular extracts by, for example, the procedure described in WO01/57076 which involves adsorbing the hydrophobin present in a hydrophobin-containing solution to surface and then contacting the surface with a surfactant, such as Tween 20, to elute the hydrophobin from the surface. See also Collen et al., 2002, Biochim. Biophys Acta. 1569: 139-50; Calonje et al., 2002, Can. J. Microbiol. 48: 1030-4; Askolin et al., 2001, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 57: 124-30; and De Vries et al., 1999, Eur J. Biochem. 262: 377-85.
Shelf-life
As used herein the term “shelf-life” is used as a generic term for the length of time that a consumer product such as a food product may be considered suitable for sale or consumption. In particular, shelf-life is the time that products can be stored, during which the defined quality of a specified proportion of the goods remains acceptable under expected (or specified) conditions of distribution, storage and display. In the instant case, shelf-life refers to the length of time that an oil-in-water emulsion maintains the physio-chemical properties critical for ensuring consumer acceptance of these products.
We have now found that oil-in-water emulsions that are resistant to oxidisation may be obtained in formulations comprising certain amounts of hydrophobin and oil.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides an oil-in-water emulsion comprising hydrophobin and oil wherein the oil has an iodine value of greater than 40 characterised in that the ratio of hydrophobin to oil is greater than 30 g/litre and less than 140 g/litre, the oil-in-water emulsion having a ratio of oil to water of at least 1 v/v %. Having conducted extensive research into the stabilisation of oil-in-water emulsions and the prevention of degradation thereof we have found that the advantage of the ratio of hydrophobin to oil is that in such emulsions oxidisation of oil in the dispersed phase is significantly reduced. Accordingly the ratio of hydrophobin to oil is preferably greater than 35 g/litre, more preferably greater than 40 g/litre, more preferably still greater than 60 g/litre and most preferably 80 g/litre. The total amount of hydrophobin used is preferably less than 130 g/litre, more preferably less than 120 g/litre, more preferably still less than 100 g/litre.
As set out above, the hydrophobin may be a class I or a class II hydrophobin, preferably a class II hydrophobin, more preferably the hydrophobin is HFBII.
The invention is capable of preventing the degradation of oxidisable oils and accordingly in a preferred embodiment the iodine value of the oil is greater than 60, more preferably greater than 90, more preferably still greater than 120, most preferably greater than 140.
Particular oils are especially suitable for use according to the invention and accordingly the oil is preferably selected from the group consisting of olive oil, corn oil, canola oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, linseed oil, and any mixture thereof.
Preferably the oil-in-water emulsion has an overrun of at least 20%, more preferably at least 40%, most preferably at least 80%. The oil-in-water emulsion preferably has an overrun of at most 200%, more preferably at most 150% and most preferably 100%.
Preferably the oil-in-water emulsion has a ratio of oil to water of at least 1 v/v %, preferably at least 2 v/v % more preferably at least 5 v/v %. The oil-in-water emulsion preferably has a ratio of oil to water of at most 90 v/v %, more preferably at most 50 v/v %, more preferably still at most 25 v/v % and most preferably at most 10 v/v %
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a food product comprising an oil-in-water emulsion comprising an oil-in-water emulsion comprising hydrophobin and oil wherein the oil phase has an iodine value of greater than 40 characterised in that the ratio of hydrophobin to oil is greater than 30 g/litre and less than 140 g/litre, the oil-in-water emulsion having a ratio of oil to water of at least 1 v/v %. Preferably, the oil-in-water emulsion has a ratio of oil to water of at least 2 v/v % more preferably at least 5 v/v %. The oil-in-water emulsion preferably has a ratio of oil to water of at most 90 v/v %, more preferably at most 50 v/v %, more preferably still at most 25 v/v % and most preferably at most 10 v/v %
The products are preferably food products, more preferably the food products are selected from the group consisting of dressings, ice creams, mayonnaises, spreads and sauces.
Hydrophobin
HFBII (Mw=7200 g.mol-1) solution from VTT Biotechnology Finland was used for all experiments. Unless otherwise stated, all water used for the experiments was of Millipore quality.
Oils
Purified sunflower oil (SFO) was used for all experiments. The composition and Iodine Value of the sunflower oil used is given in Table 1
Preparation of Hydrophobin (HFB) and Whey Protein Isolate (WPI) solutions
pH adjusted Double Distilled Water (DDW) at pH 2, pH 3 and pH 7 was prepared using 0.1M HCl or 0.1M NaOH. HFB or WPI was then incorporated into each pH adjusted DDW to a concentration of 0.2 wt % and the pH of the final solutions with each protein were adjusted with 0.1M HCl or NaOH to pH 2, 3 or 7. To these solutions, SFO was added and homogenized as follows.
Preparation of Emulsions
Compositions according to Table 2 were first subjected to Ultraturrax at 6, 500 RPM for 1 min, followed by 24,000 RPM for 10 min with continuous shaking of the beaker and then carefully transferred to Microfluidizer (MF) in order not to introduce unnecessary foam formation and subjected to MF at 1000 bar for 5 min with ice to prevent temperature increase. Bottles of emulsions were then sealed and pasteurized at 80° C. for 10 minutes and then allowed to cool.
Accelerated Oxidation Test
An accelerated oxidation test was performed on the pH 2, 3 and 7 emulsions of Comparative Example 1 and Example A as provided below. The accelerated oxidation test was carried out over 42 days at 40° C. because the period and temperature are representative of a period of from 9 to 12 months at a temperature of 20° C. The accelerated oxidation test assesses the progress of oxidation through the measurement of volatile components resulting from oxidation and was performed as follows:
The results of the oxidation test for 42 days at 40° C. as shown in Tables 3-5 show that HFB stabilized emulsions are less oxidized than WPI stabilized emulsions.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09161584 | May 2009 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2604406 | Blihovde | Jul 1952 | A |
| 2844470 | Akerboom et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
| 2937093 | Gorman et al. | May 1960 | A |
| 2970917 | Melnick | Feb 1961 | A |
| 3266214 | Kramme | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3346387 | Moncrieff et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3914441 | Finney et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3946122 | Scharp | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4012533 | Jonas | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4066794 | Schur | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4146652 | Kahn et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4305964 | Moran et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4325980 | Rek et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4425369 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4542035 | Huang et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4627631 | Sherman | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4627983 | Scharf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4629628 | Negro | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4668519 | Dartey et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4869915 | Inayoshi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4874627 | Greig et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4946625 | O'Lenick | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954440 | Johal et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4960540 | Friel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5084295 | Whelan et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5104674 | Chen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5202147 | Traska et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5215777 | Asher et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5336514 | Jones et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5393549 | Badertscher et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5397592 | Vermaas et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5436021 | Bodor et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5486372 | Martin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486732 | Martin | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5536514 | Bishay et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5620732 | Clemmings et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624612 | Sewall et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5681505 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5738897 | Gidley | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5770248 | Leibfred et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5980969 | Mordini et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6096867 | Byass et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6187365 | Vaghela et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6238714 | Binder et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6284303 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6497913 | Gray et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6579557 | Benjamins et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6685977 | Asano et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6914043 | Champan et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 7338779 | Nakari-Setala et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 8038740 | Subkowski et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8178151 | Bramley et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8206770 | Aldred et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8216624 | Berry et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 20010048962 | Fenn et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020085987 | Brown et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155208 | Benjamins et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020182300 | Groh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197375 | Adolphi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030087017 | Hanselmann et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099751 | Aldred et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134025 | Vaghela et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030148400 | Haikara et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166960 | de Vocht et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175407 | Kunst et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190402 | McBride | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040109930 | Hooft et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040161503 | Malone et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185162 | Finnigan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050037110 | Windhab et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123666 | Vaghela et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123668 | Kodali et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050129810 | Lindner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193744 | Cockings et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220961 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060024417 | Berry et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024419 | Aldred et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20070014908 | Bramley et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071865 | Aldred et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071866 | Cox et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116848 | Aldred et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286936 | Bramley et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298490 | Sweigard et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080175972 | Cox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254180 | Windhab et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080305237 | Beltman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090136433 | Subkowski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142467 | Aldred et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100086662 | Cox et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303998 | Cox et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1094866 | Oct 2003 | CA |
| 1218557 | Nov 2004 | CA |
| 2575325 | Feb 2006 | CA |
| 29715519 | Nov 1997 | DE |
| 216270 | Apr 1987 | EP |
| 0274348 | Jul 1988 | EP |
| 0285198 | Oct 1988 | EP |
| 0322952 | Jul 1989 | EP |
| 336817 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0426211 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0469656 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0521543 | Jan 1993 | EP |
| 0477825 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 775444 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0777969 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 777969 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 0930017 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 1061006 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1074181 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 0747301 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 0919134 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 0771531 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1284106 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 0995685 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1400486 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1520484 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1520485 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1557092 | Jul 2005 | EP |
| 1621084 | Feb 2006 | EP |
| 1621084 | Feb 2006 | EP |
| 1623631 | Feb 2006 | EP |
| 1800543 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 1849461 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 2052628 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 459583 | Jan 1937 | GB |
| 1556297 | Nov 1979 | GB |
| 530006491 | Jan 1978 | JP |
| 61219342 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| 61293348 | Dec 1986 | JP |
| 03164156 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| 3244348 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| 5503426 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| 08500486 | Jan 1996 | JP |
| 8503608 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| 2002508303 | Dec 1998 | JP |
| 2005278484 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2004018844 | Mar 2004 | KR |
| WO9013571 | Nov 1990 | WO |
| WO9222581 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO9403617 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| WO9412050 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO9413154 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO9523843 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO9611586 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO9621362 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO9641882 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO9804699 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO9937673 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO9954725 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO0022936 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO0038547 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO0053026 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO0058342 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO0114521 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO0135756 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO0174864 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0184945 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO03015530 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03051136 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO03053383 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03053883 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03096821 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO2005058055 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO2005058067 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO2005102067 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO2005113387 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2006010425 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2006010426 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2007087967 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO2007087968 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO2008031796 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO2008116733 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO2009047657 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO2010067059 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Swern, D. 1979. Bailey's Industrial OII and Fat Products, vol. 1, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons. New York. p. 317, 326, 377, 382, 398. |
| Dickinson, Dec. 2, 2010, Mixed biopolymers at interfaces: Competitive adsorption and multilayer structures, Food Hydrocolloids, 25, 1966-1983. |
| Fox, 1992, Analytical methods for Milk Proteins, Advanced Dairy Chemistry 1: Proteins, 1, 1, 6-7. |
| Graham et al, Jul. 3, 1979, Proteins at Liquid Interfaces, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 70, 415-426. |
| Miquelim et al, 2010, pH Influence on the stability of foams with protein-polysaccharide complexes at their interfaces, Food Hydrocolloids, 24, No. 4, 398-405. |
| Patino and Pilosof, 2011, Protein-polysaccharide interactions at fluid interfaces, Food Hydrocolloids, 25, 1925-1937. |
| Schmitt, Feb. 27, 2012, Declaration of Christophe Schmitt, Declaration of Christophe Schmitt, ., 1-4. |
| Wang et al, May 31, 2004, Protease A Stability of Beer Foam II, China Acadmic Journal Electronic Publishing House, ., 11-15. |
| Guinee et al, 2004, Salt in Cheese: Physical, Chemical and Biological Aspects, vol. 1, 3rd Ed., pp. 207-259. |
| Arbuckle, 1972, Ice Cream, Ice Cream, 2nd Edition, pp. 15, 18, 35, 61, 65. |
| Kinderlerer, 1997, Chrysosporium species, potential spoilage organisms of chocolate, Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 83, pp. 771-778. |
| Pardun, 1977, Soy Protein Preparations as Antispattering Agents for Margarine, Fette Seifen Anstrichmittel, vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 195-203. |
| Samsudin, May 26, 2010, Low-Fat Chocolate Spread Based on Palm Oil, Malasyian Palm Oil Board, ., pp. 27-30. |
| Scott et al., 1983, Influence of Temperature on the Measurement of Water Activity of Food and Salt Systems, Journal of Food Science, vol. 48, pp. 552-554. |
| Goh, Applications and Uses of Palm and Palm Kernel Oils, Malaysian Oil Science and Technology, Apr. 8, 2002, 11, 46-50. |
| CRC, Fennema's Food Chemistry, CRC Press, Jan. 1, 2008, 4th Ed., pp. 727-728, Taylor & Francis Group. |
| Kilcast, Sensory perception of creaminess & its relationship with food, Food Quality and Preference, Jun. 20, 2002, 13, 609-623, Elsevier. |
| De Vocht, et al, Structural Characterization of the Hydrophobin SC3, Biophysical Journal, Apr. 1, 1998, 74, 2059-2068, Biophysical Journal. |
| Hui, Encyclopedia of Food Science & Tehcnology, John Wiley & Sons, Jan. 1, 1992, 1, 204-210. |
| Bailey, et al., Process Technol effects of deletion & amplification of hydrophobins I & II in transformants of Trich reesei, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, Jan. 31, 2002, 58, 721-727. |
| Collen, et al., A novel two-step extraction method w detergent polymer sys for primary recovery of the fusion protein endoglucanase I-hydro I, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Jan. 15, 2002, 1569, No. 1-3, 139-150. |
| Linder, et al, The hydrophobins HFBI & HFBII from Trichoderma reesei showing efficient interatctions w nonionic surfactants in aqueous two-phase sys, Biomacromolecules, Jul. 1, 2001, 2, No. 2, 511-517. |
| McGregor, et al., Antifoam effects on ultrafiltration, Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Jan. 1, 1988, 31, No. 4, 385-389. |
| Chaisalee, et al., Mechanism of Antifoam Behavior of Solutions of Nonionic Surfactants Above the Cloud Point, Journal of Surfactants & Detergents, Oct. 1, 2003, 6, No. 4, 345-351. |
| Holmes, et al., Evaluation of antifoams in the expression of a recombinant FC fusion protein in shake flask cultures, Microbial Cell Factories, Oct. 10, 2006, 5, No. 1, P30. |
| Hung, et al., Cloud-point extraction of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by nonionic surfactants, Separation & Purification Tech, Aug. 20, 2007, 57, 1-10. |
| Cox, et al., Exceptional Stability of food foams using class II hydrophobin HFBII, Food Hydrocolloids, Jan. 1, 2009, 23, 366-376. |
| Cox, et al., Surface Properties of Class II Hydrophobins from Trichoderma reesei & Influence on bubble stability, Langmuir, Jun. 20, 2007, 23, 7995-8002. |
| Wessels, Hydrophobins Proteins that Change the Nature of the Fungal Surface, Advances in Microbial Physiology, Jan. 1, 1997, 38, No. 38, 1-45. |
| Wosten, Hydrophobins Multipurpose Proteins, Annu Rev Microbiol, Jan. 1, 2001, 55, 625-646. |
| Askolin, et al., Overproduction purification and characterization of Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin HFBI, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, Aug. 9, 2001, 57, 124-130. |
| McCabe, et al., Secretion of Cryparin a Fungal Hydrophobin, Applied & Environmental Microbiology, Dec. 1, 1999, 65, No. 12, 5431-5435. |
| Askolin, et al., Interaction & comparison of a Class I Hydrophobin from schizophyllum commune & Class II Hydro form Trichoderma reesei, Biomacromolecules, Jan. 10, 2006, 7, 1295-1301. |
| Lumsdon, et al., Adsorption of hyrdrophobin proteins at hydrophobic & hydrophilic interfaces, Colloids & Surfaces, Sep. 1, 2005, 44, 172-178. |
| Wosten, et al., Interfacial self-assembly of a hydrophobin into an amphipathic protein membrane mediates fungal attachment to hydrophobic surfaces, EMBO Journal, Jan. 1, 1994, 13, 5848-5854. |
| Swern, Baileys Industrial Oil and Fat Products, John Wiley & Sons, Jan. 1, 1979, 1, 369. |
| European Search Report, EP 09 16 1584, Oct. 15, 2009, 2 pp. |
| Co-pending appln. Berry et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/168,209, filed Jun. 27, 2005. |
| Co-pending appln. Aldred et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/168,214, filed Jun. 27, 2005. |
| Co-pending appln. Aldred et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,977, filed Sep. 21, 2006. |
| Co-pending appln. Aldred et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,060, filed Sep. 21, 2006. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,675, filed Sep. 21, 2006. |
| Co-pending appln. Bramley et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/639,851, filed Dec. 15, 2006. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/699,601, filed Jan. 30, 2007. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/699,602, filed Jan. 30, 2007. |
| Co-pending appln. Burmester et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/002,684, filed Dec. 18, 2007. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,717, filed Apr. 12, 2010. |
| Co-pending appln. Aldred et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,957 filed Oct. 15, 2008. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/578,752, filed Oct. 14, 2009. |
| Co-pending appln. Aldred et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,395, filed May 27, 2010. |
| Co-pending appln. Watts et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,419, filed May 27, 2010. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,667, filed Sep. 23, 2009. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/532,670, filed Sep. 23, 2009. |
| Co-pending appln. Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/780,294, filed May 14, 2010. |
| Co-pending appln. Aumaitre et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/409,549, filed Mar. 24, 2009. |
| Co-pending application for Hedges, S/N 636,157 filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
| Linder, Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi, Microbiology Reviews, Jan. 21, 2005, vol. 29 No. 5, 877-896. |
| Research pushes the right buttons, mushrooms are the new fat, University of Birmingham, Feb. 25, 2008, 1-2. |
| Calonje, et al., Properties of a hydrophobin isolated from the mycoparasitic fungus Verticillium fungicola, Can J Microbiol, Dec. 13, 2002, 48, 1030-1034. |
| De Vries, et al., Identification & characterization of a tri-partite hydrophobin from Claviceps fusiformis, Eur J Biochem, Mar. 2, 1999, 262, 377-385. |
| Cruse, Whipped Soup is Tasty, St. Petersberg Independant, May 26, 1970, ., B-4. |
| Hunter, et al., The role of particles in stabilising foams and emulsions, Advances in Colloid & Interface Science, Jan. 1, 2008, 137, 57-81. |
| Scholtmeijer, et al., Fungal hydrophobins in medical and technical applications, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, May 19, 2001, 56, 1-8. |
| Arbuckle, Ice Cream, Avi Publishing, Jan. 1, 1972, 2nd Ed, 284. |
| Wosten, et al., Hydrophobins the fungal coat unravelled, Biophysica Acta, May 29, 2000, 1469, 79-86. |
| CP Kelco US Inc., Certificate of Analysis for Keltrol RD, CP Kelco, Apr. 17, 2001, 1. |
| Berolzheimer, Culinary Arts Institute Encyclopedic Cookbook, Culinart Arts Institute, Jan. 1, 1988, 648. |
| Talbot, Aerial Morphogenesis Enter the Chaplins, Current Biology, Sep. 16, 2003, 13, R696-R698. |
| Murray, Stabilization of bubbles and foams, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Aug. 3, 2007, 12, 232-241. |
| Murray, et al., Foam stability proteins and nanoparticles, Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Sc, Jan. 1, 2004, 9, 314-320. |
| Damodaran, Adsorbed layers formed from mixtures of proteins, Current Opinion to Colloid & Interface Science, Oct. 27, 2004, 9, 328-339. |
| Dictionary.Com, Stabilizer, Dictionary.com, Jun. 14, 2010, *, 1. |
| Bay, La Cucina Italiana Italian Cuisine, Edizioni Piemme, Jan. 1, 2002, *, 1233. |
| Eleves, Teodora Gliga, Eleves, Jun. 8, 2007, *, 1. |
| Nakari-Setala, et al., Differential expression of the vegetative and spore-bound hydrophobins of Trichoderma reesei, Eur J. Biochem, May 26, 1997, 248, 415-423. |
| Tchuenbou-Magaia, et al., Hydrophobins stabilised air-filled emulsions for the food industry, Food Hydrocolloids, Mar. 16, 2009, 23, 1877-1885. |
| Kershaw, et al., Hydrophobins and Repellents Proteins with Fundamental Roles in Fungal Morphogenesis, Genetics & Biology, Jan. 1, 1998, 23, 18-33. |
| Wosten, et al., Interfacial self-assembly of a fungal hydrophobin into a hydrophobic rodlet layer, Plant Cell, Nov. 1, 1993, 5, 1567-1574. |
| Co-pending application, Aldred et al, U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,060, filed Sep. 21, 2006. |
| Co-pending application, Bot et al, U.S. Appl. No. 13/378,143, filed Dec. 14, 2001. |
| Co-pending application, Hedges et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,157, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
| Jan. 1, 2005, Fats Oils Fatty Acids Triglycerides, Scientific Psychic, *, 1-4. |
| Jun. 14, 2010, Guar Gum, Guargum.biz, *, 1. |
| Oct. 16, 2009, Search proteins matching the sequence pattern used for the hydrophobin definition in patent EP 1926 399 B1, Nestle Research Center, *, 1-3. |
| Arbuckle, Jan. 1, 1972, Ice Cream, Ice Cream 2nd Ed 1972 pp. 35 266 284-285, 2nd Edition, 35, 266, 284-285. |
| Arbuckle, 1972, Ice Cream, Ice Cream, 2nd Ed., 265, Avi Publishing Company. |
| Arbuckle, 1972, Ice Cream, Ice Cream, 2nd, 31. |
| Askolin, et al., Aug. 9, 2001, Overproduction purification and characterization of Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin HFBI, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 57, 124-130. |
| Chakraborty, et al., Jan. 1, 1972, Stabilization of Calcium Sensitive Plant Proteins by k-Carrageenan, Journal of Food Science, 37, 719-721. |
| Cheer, et al., Jan. 1, 1983, Effects of Sucrose on the Rheological Behavior of Wheat Starch Pastes, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 28, 1829-1836. |
| CRC, Jan. 1, 2008, Fennema's Food Chemistry, CRC Press, 4th Ed., pp. 727-728, Taylor & Francis Group. |
| Davis, et al., Jan. 1, 2001, Application of foaming for the recovery of surfactin from B. subtilis ATCC 21332 cultures, Enzyme & Microbial Technology, 28, 346-354. |
| De Vocht et al., Apr. 1998, Structural Characterization of the Hydrophobin SC3, as a Monomer and after Self-Assembly at Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Interfaces, Biophysical Journal, 74, 2059-2068. |
| Dr. E. Kododziejcxzyk, Nov. 16, 2009, Adsortion of different proteins to Teflon sheets: Experimental Results, Nestle Research Center. |
| Fellows, 2000, Principles and Practice, Food processing technology, 2nd, 83, 140, 429, Foodhead Publishing. |
| Fox, et al., Jan. 1, 2004, Cheese: Physical, Chemical and Biological Aspects, Cheese Chemistry, Physics & Microbiology, 3rd, vol. 1, 207-223. |
| Grant, Jan. 1, 1987, Grant & Hackh's Chemical Dictionary, McGraw-Hill, 5th Ed, 212. |
| Guner, et al., Jan. 1, 2007, Production of yogurt ice cream at different acidity, Intl Journ of Food Sc & Tech, 42, 948-952. |
| Hakanpaa, et al., Jan. 2, 2004, Atomic Resolution Structure of the HFBII Hydrophobin a Self-assembling Amphiphile, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279, No. 1, 534-539. |
| Katzbauer et al, Jun. 19, 1997, Properties and applications of xanthan gum, Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 59, 81-84, Elsevier. |
| Kilkast et al., Jun. 20, 2002, Sensory perception of creaminess and its relationship with food structure, Food Quality and Preference, 13, 609-623. |
| Kloek, et al., Feb. 2, 2001, Effect of Bulk and Interfacial Rheological Properties on Bubble Dissolution, Journal of Colloid & Interface Sc, 237, 158-166. |
| Lambou et al., 1973, Whey Solids as Agricultural Foam Stabilizers, Jr. of Agr. And Food Chemistry, 21 No. 2, 257-263. |
| Marshall, Jan. 1, 2003, Ice Cream, Springer, 6th Ed, 70-73. |
| Martin, et al, Jan. 14, 2000, Sc30 Hydrophobin Organization in Aqueous Media & Assembly onto Surfaces as Mediated by Assoc Polysaccharide Schizophyllan, Biomacromolecules, 1, 49-60. |
| Mathlouthi, et al, Jan. 1, 1995, Rheological properties of sucrose solutions and suspensions, Sucrose Properties & Applic, *, 126-154. |
| Minor, et al., Jan. 1, 2009, Preparation and sensory perception of fat-free foams effect of matrix properties and level of aeration, Intl Journ of Food Sc & Tech, 44, 735-747. |
| Penttila, et al., Jan. 1, 2004, Molecular Biology of Trichoderma & Biotechnological Applications, Handbook of Fungal Biotech, 2nd Ed, 413-427. |
| Quintas, et al., Jan. 1, 2006, Rheology of superstaurated sucrose solutions, Journal of Food Engineering, 77, 844-852. |
| Russo, et al., Jan. 1, 1982, Surface activity of the phytotoxin cerato-ulmin, Natl Research Council of Canada, 60, 1414-1422. |
| Sanderson, 1981, Applications of Xanthan Gum, British Polymer Jr., 13, 71-75. |
| Sienkiewicz, Jan. 1, 1990, Whey and Whey Utilization, Verlag Th Mann, 2nd Ed, 82-83. |
| Soukoulis, et al., May 2, 2008, Impact of the acidification process hydrocolloids & protein fortifiers on the physical & Sensory properties of frozen yogurt, Intl Journal of Dairy Tech, 61, No. 2, 170-177. |
| Stringer, et al, Feb. 1, 1993, Cerato-ulmin a toxin involved in dutch elm disease is a fungal hydrophobin, Plant Cell, *, 145-146. |
| Takai, et al., Jan. 1, 1978, Cerato-ulmin, a wilting toxin of ceratocystis ulmi: isolation & some properties of ceratoulmin from the culture of C. ulmi, Phytopath, 91, 129-146. |
| Talbot, Jan. 1, 2001, 7 Fungal Hydrophobins, Howard & Gow, 7, 145-159. |
| Talbot, et al., Jun. 1, 1996, MPG1 encodes a fungal hydrophobin involved in surface interactions during infection-related develop of magnaporthe grisea, Plant Cell, 8, 985-999. |
| Temple, 2000, Biological Roles for cerato-Ulmin, a Hydrophobin secreted by the elm pathogens, Opthiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi, Micological Society of America, 92, 1-9. |
| Van Der Werf, Jan. 1, 2000, Green coatings healthy foods and drug targeting, Leads in Life Science, 5, 1. |
| Wessels, et al., Jan. 1, 1996, Fungal hydrophobins proteins that function at an interface, Trends in Plant Science, 1, No. 1, 9-15. |
| Whitcomb, et al., Jan. 1, 1980, Rheology of Guar Solutions, Journal of Applied Polymer Sc, 25, 2815-2827. |
| Jackson, Apr. 16, 2008, Hard or Soft, Red or White—or a blend?, Flour Power, pp. 1-4. |
| Notice of Opposition and Grounds of Opposition, dated Dec. 23, 2009—Nestec S.A./Unilever N.V. (EP1926399). |
| Response to Notice of Opposition, dated Oct. 29, 2010—Nestec S.A./Unilever N.V. (EP1926399). |
| Co-pending application Cox et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/585,257, filed Aug. 14, 2012. |
| 2012, West Search History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,157, Carbohydrates, pp. 1-29. |
| Joseph M. Light, 1990, Modified Food Starches Why What Where and How, Modified Food Starches, vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 1-20. |
| Co-pending application Mitchell et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/498,157, filed Mar. 26, 2012. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110086157 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
