1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of fuel injectors.
2. Prior Art
A previous method utilized an intensified injector that used medium pressure (1200 bar) fuel as the actuation fluid for the intensification section. However the quantity of fuel needed to properly perform the intensification process currently exceeds the capacity of commercially available fuel pumps. Also by using fuel for the intensification function, static leakage in this area was problematic/expensive.
Another previous method was the intensified injector in which low pressure oil (<300 bar) was used in a hydraulic intensifier to raise the fuel pressure to a high level for injection. In this injector, fuel pressure was kept near ambient.
The purpose of this invention is to combine a common-rail non-intensified injector with an oil-intensified injector. The advantage of the oil-intensified injector is that oil pumps to provide this level of pressure (<320 bar) are commercially available in the flow rates required.
The invention also uses fuel (common rail) pumps that are commercially available since the injector does not rely on this pump for intensification function (small pump requirement). Also, since the pressure of the fuel pump is limited to lower than the intensified pressure, the injected pressure is limited to the unit injector; this eases the rail and tube requirements to this lower fuel rail pressure. The system is able to achieve very high injection pressure without common rail pump, rail, fitting and jumper tube limits.
A small, commercially available common rail pump is used to a limited ‘medium’ (approximately 1200 bar) pressure (it should be noted that this pressure is not limited to 1200 bar, but should be less than the targeted intensified pressure). This fuel source is connected to the injector. The injector operates up to this limited pressure with no intensification. The injector uses this limited pressure with a needle control valve also using this fuel/pressure source.
A separate oil system is configured to operate a hydraulic intensifier. Without using this system, the injector operates solely on fuel and only up to the limited fuel rail pressure. The oil-operated intensifier system acts as a separate unit pump used to boost the fuel pressure in the injector, when needed, to above the level of the medium pressure of the fuel pump/rail. The oil system does not need to operate or run unless these elevated pressures are required. This extends to engine starting, cold starting, idle, light load conditions, etc. This improves sociability and efficiency over old systems.
Also, since the needle control valve operates using the limited pressure fuel source, we are able to run very high (approximately 3000 bar) intensified pressures without burden to the needle control valve. This fact permits the injector to operate at higher pressures than most systems without being limited by the typical pressure limits of needle control valves.
Two embodiments are specifically disclosed, one wherein the intensifier, when used, is refilled with fuel from the medium pressure fuel source, whereas in a second embodiment, the intensifier, when used, is refilled with fuel from a low pressure fuel source.
Now referring to
Also as shall subsequently be seen, fuel pressure in line 50 is controlled by a double acting poppet valve, generally indicated by the numeral 54. That poppet valve may be seen on expanded scales in
The poppet valve member 56 is generally urged downward by coil spring 66 acting against member 68, but is free to move upward on coupling an actuation current through solenoid coil 70 which provides direct magnetic attraction on the armature 72 connected to the poppet valve member 56. Region 74 above the upper poppet valve is coupled to a low pressure fuel vent so that when the poppet valve member 56 is in the lower position, fuel in region 64 is blocked by the lower poppet valve, though line 50 is coupled through the upper poppet valve to vent region 74. In this condition, region under pin 44 (
Now referring to
The refilling of the plunger chamber with fuel under an adequate pressure for injection without intensification is not the most efficient way of operating such an injector. Thus
A second ball valve 92 acts as a double check valve as follows. Fuel under pressure is directly coupled to line 76 as in the first embodiment. If the intensifier is not being used, ball valve 92 will be in the lower position, blocking fuel flow through channel 94 to the intensifier chamber, but allowing fuel flow from line 76 to line 36 for direct fuel injection through control of the needle control valve 54 (
In
The use of the proven, low leak double acting poppet valve is important to small quantity control and high efficiency. Its single coil, poppet design is fail safe, robust and offers very high signal to noise ratio. It is a 3-way configuration, offering much better needle-valve open and close rate control with no short circuit loss during injection events, typical of two way valve, common rail approaches. The floating seat design offers excellent self alignment, reducing any tendency of stiction. The orifice controlled, short stroke valve has been shown to offer very precise small quantity control at all pressures. (It is noteworthy that a typical two way valve, in order to achieve high needle closing rates, must have very large orifices, which increases the fuel loss during an injection event. Furthermore, these large orifices reduce the injector's ability to control small quantities due to the large gain of the resulting valve. For this reason, a typical two way common rail control valve must compromise fuel efficiency, needle closing rate, minimum quantity control and pressure ratio. The use of a three way valve addresses all of these deficiencies.)
The embodiments disclosed herein use a “fuel-under” design for needle control, which is superior to common-rail-style “fuel-over” designs, as it results it much higher needle closing rates and has lower needle valve seat loading (critical for the very high pressure requirements of the application). This configuration, coupled with the three way control valve is ideally suited for the high pressure and multiple injection event requirements of this application.
Thus the advantages over what has been done before include the ability to run very high injection pressures without needing either of the following:
1. High flow medium pressure fuel pump
2. Very high pressure low flow fuel pump
Additional features include:
3. Lower static leakage compared to all fuel intensified systems
4. Better cold starting characteristics compared to oil intensified systems
5. Improved NVH over oil intensified systems
An alternate to the embodiments disclosed could include the needle control valve connected to the intensified fuel circuit. In the case of non-intensified function, it would operate identically. During intensification, the needle control valve would operate with the very high pressure intensified fuel source. This configuration simplifies construction of the injector, but necessitates use of a needle control valve capable of full pressure fuel operation.
Thus the invention includes two separate fluid systems with the ability to operate the injector without having to operate the oil circuit:
1. Easier cold start by not having to operate the oil circuit during this function
2. Lower NVH by not having to operate the oil circuit during light loads
3. Improved efficiency by not having to operate the oil circuit (static leakage at intensifier circuit) during light loads
4. Very high injection pressures when needed because of the availability of the oil based hydraulic intensifier
The invention provides:
A fuel system from running two discrete fluid circuits, when both circuits are significantly above ambient pressure. The ability to run these circuits independently from each other.
The ability to operate on a singe (fuel) circuit during certain conditions, matching common rail system type performance at medium and lower injection pressures.
The ability to add the second fluid circuit only when necessary to achieve certain objectives, especially when injection pressure only achievable to date by unit injectors is the goal.
Overall, the injectors of the present invention have the Following Advantages:
1. Cold start—Engine can be started as a common rail system
2. The system can run as common rail system at idle and light loads, drastically reducing NVH
3. System can provide suitable limp home capability with complete hydraulic failure
4. System can provide suitable limp home capability with a high pressure fuel pump failure
5. System is capable of multiple injection events including boot injection
6. Uses much existing hardware/tooling
7. Nut stack is an application of an existing injector
8. Medium pressure fuel pump is an “off-the-shelf” unit
9. Capable of very high pressure and meets or exceeds technical requirements
10. Low capital investment—no pump development
11. Distinct product differentiation in the marketplace
12. Use of “fuel under” configuration results in much high needle valve closing rates and lower needle valve seat loading
13. Use of 3-way needle control valve improves efficiency and needle transient rate control
The intensifier control valve could actually be made less expensively than prior valve by:
1. Relax tolerances
2. Increase seal overlap—decreases leakage
3. Increase open area—increases pressure efficiency
4. Possibility to eliminate one of the coils, as speed and cold start become less of an issue
5. Improve spool edge wear with increased overlaps
6. Slower intensifier control valve can improve NVH in the hydraulic system
Thus while certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/073,196 filed Jun. 17, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5301875 | Gant et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5419492 | Gant et al. | May 1995 | A |
5460329 | Sturman | Oct 1995 | A |
5485957 | Sturman | Jan 1996 | A |
5732679 | Takahasi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5970956 | Sturman | Oct 1999 | A |
6012644 | Sturman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6085991 | Sturman | Jul 2000 | A |
6161770 | Sturman | Dec 2000 | A |
6257499 | Sturman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6360728 | Sturman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6684853 | Lei | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7032574 | Sturman | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7108200 | Sturman | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7412969 | Pena et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7568632 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7568633 | Sturman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61073196 | Jun 2008 | US |