Amyloidosis is a group of diseases caused by the formation of amyloid aggregates [Chiti, F., et al. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (2006) 75: 333-366]. These amyloid aggregates are believed to fall into two main categories: globular oligomers and curvilinear fibrils (gO/CFs) or “traditional” rigid fibrils (RFs) [Gosal, W. S., et al. J. Mol. Biol. (2005) 351: 850-864. T. Miti et al. Biomacromolecules (2015) 16: 326-335]. A major focus of research is to unravel the mechanisms and kinetics of formation for these distinct amyloid aggregate species. The most commonly used technique for monitoring amyloid assembly kinetics is the amyloid indicator dye Thioflavin-T (ThT). A significant drawback, however, is that ThT fluorescence responds to both gO/CF and RF aggregates, albeit with different sensitivities [Joseph Foley, et al. J. Chem. Phys. (2013) 139:121901]. This makes the decomposition of ThT kinetics into its gO/CF and RF components difficult to impossible. Yet, even screening protocols for identifying the selectivity of dyes for one over the other amyloid species are lacking. There is an unmet need for a method to selectively determine the presence of gO/CF species in samples.
Amyloids have been known to arise from many different proteins and polypeptides. These polypeptide chains generally form β-sheet structures that aggregate into long fibers; however, identical polypeptides can fold into multiple distinct amyloid conformations. The diversity of the conformations may have led to different forms of the prion diseases. In particular, large populations of small globular amyloid oligomers (gOs) and curvilinear fibrils (CFs) are often found to precede the formation of late-stage rigid fibrils (RFs), and have been implicated as major contributors to amyloid toxicity.
As disclosed herein, the triarylmethane dye crystal violet (also known as tris(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)methylium chloride, methyl violet 10B, or hexamethyl pararosaniline chloride) is a highly selective indicator of gOs and CFs. Therefore, disclosed herein are compositions, kits, and methods for selectively detecting amyloids in a tissue, either in vitro or in vivo.
For example, disclosed herein is a composition that comprises a gO/CF-selective dye.
Also disclosed is a kit for detecting amyloids in a tissue that contains a gO/CF-selective dye.
Optionally, in either of the two embodiments above, the composition and/or kit may further comprise an RF-selective dye.
Therefore, disclosed herein are methods to diagnose early stages of neurological disease involving amyloid B oligomers, such as Alzheimer's, Lewy Body dementia, etc., that involve detecting gO/CF in the subject or in a sample from the subject.
For example, disclosed is an in vitro method for detecting amyloids in a biological sample, such as a tissue or bodily fluid sample that involves contacting the tissue with a gO/CF-selective dye and assaying the sample for presence of the gO/CF-selective dye. In some embodiments, the method further involves contacting the tissue with an RF-selective dye and assaying the sample for presence of the RF-binding dye.
Also disclosed is an in vivo method for detecting amyloids in a subject that involves administering to the subject a composition comprising a gO/CF-selective dye and assaying the subject for presence of the gO/CF-selective dye. In some embodiments, the method further involves administering to the subject a composition comprising an RF-selective dye and assaying the subject for presence of the RF-binding dye. Therefore, in some embodiments, the gO/CF-selective dye and/or the RF-selective dye is tethered to a positron-emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) probe.
In some embodiments of the above compositions and methods, the RF-selective dye can be thioflavin T. In some embodiments of the above compositions and methods, the gO/CF-selective dye comprises a triarylmethane dye, such as a methyl violet dye, such as crystal violet. In one embodiment, the triarylmethane dye is crystal violet. Additional RF-selective and gO/CF-selective dyes are described herein.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Before the present disclosure is described in greater detail, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to particular embodiments described, and as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present disclosure will be limited only by the appended claims.
Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range, is encompassed within the disclosure. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges and are also encompassed within the disclosure, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the disclosure.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, the preferred methods and materials are now described.
All publications and patents cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual publication or patent were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference and are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. The citation of any publication is for its disclosure prior to the filing date and should not be construed as an admission that the present disclosure is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior disclosure. Further, the dates of publication provided could be different from the actual publication dates that may need to be independently confirmed.
As will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading this disclosure, each of the individual embodiments described and illustrated herein has discrete components and features which may be readily separated from or combined with the features of any of the other several embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. Any recited method can be carried out in the order of events recited or in any other order that is logically possible.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will employ, unless otherwise indicated, techniques of chemistry, biology, and the like, which are within the skill of the art.
The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to perform the methods and use the probes disclosed and claimed herein. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers (e.g., amounts, temperature, etc.), but some errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, temperature is in ° C., and pressure is at or near atmospheric. Standard temperature and pressure are defined as 20° C. and 1 atmosphere.
Before the embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail, it is to be understood that, unless otherwise indicated, the present disclosure is not limited to particular materials, reagents, reaction materials, manufacturing processes, or the like, as such can vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for purposes of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. It is also possible in the present disclosure that steps can be executed in different sequence where this is logically possible.
It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The term “subject” refers to any individual who is the target of administration or treatment. The subject can be a vertebrate, for example, a mammal. Thus, the subject can be a human or veterinary patient. The term “patient” refers to a subject under the treatment of a clinician, e.g., physician.
Detection of Amyloid Oligomers
Amyloids are aggregates of proteins which can, under some circumstances, assume a conformation that allows many copies of that protein to form hydrogen bonds along their backbone and, thereby form fibrils. In the human body, amyloids have been linked to the development of various diseases. Pathogenic amyloids form when previously healthy proteins lose their normal physiological conformation and form fibrous deposits, either as extracellular plaques or intracellular inclusions (tangles, Lewis bodies) which can disrupt the healthy function of tissues and organs.
Such amyloids have been associated with more than 50 human diseases, known as amyloidoses, and play a critical role in multiple neurodegenerative disorders. Some amyloid proteins are infectious; these are called prions in which the infectious form can act as a template to convert other non-infectious proteins into infectious form. Amyloids may also have normal biological functions; for example, in the formation of fimbriae in some genera of bacteria, transmission of epigenetic traits in fungi, as well as pigment deposition and hormone release in humans.
Amyloids have been known to arise from many different proteins and polypeptides. These polypeptide chains generally form β-sheet structures that aggregate into long fibers; however, identical polypeptides can fold into multiple distinct amyloid conformations. The diversity of the conformations may have led to different forms of the prion diseases.
Frequently large populations of small globular amyloid oligomers (gOs) and curvilinear fibrils (CFs) precede the formation of late-stage rigid fibrils (RFs), and have been implicated as major contributors to amyloid toxicity. gOs and their associated CFs, often referred to as protofibrils, have been observed with large numbers of amyloid proteins and over a wide range of growth conditions. Substantial evidence suggests that early-stage gOs are potent sources of cytotoxicity in amyloid diseases. (U. Sengupta et al, EBioMedicine (2016) 6:42-49) Metastable oligomers also affect the aggregation of pharmaceuticals, and might hold answers to the question what distinguishes functional from pathological amyloid species. Formation of metastable precursors relates to a variety of physiochemical and biomedical problems. This includes metastable liquid phases as precursor of protein crystallization or sickle-cell hemoglobin fibrillation, as well as the significance of membrane-less organelles in promoting ALS fibril formation. Some amyloid oligomers themselves have been suggested to share characteristics of disordered liquid-like states.
In the clinical setting, amyloid aggregates are typically identified by a change in the fluorescence intensity of planar aromatic dyes such as thioflavin T, congo red, or NIAD-4. In general, this is attributed to the environmental change, as these dyes bind to the fibrillar beta-strands. However, these dyes preferentially respond to late stage RFs instead of gOs and CFs. Thus, they are not able to selectively determine the presence of gOs or CFs.
As disclosed herein, the triarylmethane dye crystal violet is a highly selective indicator of gOs and CFs. Therefore, disclosed herein are compositions, kits, and methods for detecting amyloids in a sample, either in vitro or in vivo, that involve a triarylmethane dye such as crystal violet, methyl violet, or a gO/CF-binding derivative thereof. The composition, kit, and/or method for detecting amyloids in a sample may further comprise a thioflavin T, congo red, or NIAD-4 dye, or an RF-binding derivative thereof. The methods involve assaying a sample which may contain bodily fluids or a tissue sample from a subject for detection of the aggregate-induced change in dye fluorescence.
In some embodiments, the in vitro method is performed on solutions, body fluids, or fixed or unfixed tissue sections, e.g. from live or cadaverous samples.
In some embodiments, the in vivo method is performed on subjects suspected of having amyloid deposits of some form.
Use of tissue sections allows for combined or separate staining. For example, in some embodiments, both dyes are used on the same tissue section and assayed simultaneously. In some cases, each dye is used separately on adjacent tissue sections. In some embodiments, the dyes are used serially on the same tissue section and assayed separately.
In some embodiments, the dye(s) are detected by light and/or fluorescent microscopy. For example, crystal violet dye fluorescence emitted at 630 nm is preferentially enhanced upon binding to gO/CFs when excited near 590 nm (or 560 nm); thioflavin T (ThT), upon binding to RFs, gives a strong fluorescence signal at approximately 482 nm when excited at 450 nm. In some embodiments, the dye(s) are detected by measuring fluorescence and/or absorbance according to standard methods known in the art.
gO/CF-Binding Dyes
Disclosed herein are triarylmethane dyes that preferentially respond to gO/CF amyloids. Triarylmethane dyes are synthetic organic compounds containing triphenylmethane backbones. Triarylmethane dyes can be grouped into families according to the nature of the substituents on the aryl groups. In some cases, the anions associated with the cationic dyes (e.g. crystal violet) vary even though the name of the dye does not. Often it is shown as chloride.
In some embodiments, the gO/CF-binding dye is a Methyl violet dye. Methyl violet dyes, such as Methyl violet 2B, Methyl violet 6B, and Methyl violet 10B, have dimethylamino groups at the p-positions of two aryl groups.
Crystal violet (also known as methyl violet 10B or hexamethyl pararosaniline chloride) is a triarylmethane dye predominantly used as a histological stain and in Gram's method of classifying bacteria.
In some embodiments, the disclosed gO/CF-binding dye is a compound selected from the group consisting of:
wherein each R and R′ is independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and C1-C6 linear or branched alkyl.
In some embodiments, the gO/CF-binding dye is a fuchsine dye, such as pararosaniline, fuchsine, new fuchsine, and fuchsine acid. In some embodiments, the gO/CF-binding dye is a phenol dye, such as phenolphthalein, phenol red, chlorophenol red, cresol red, bromocresol purple, and bromocresol green. In some embodiments, the gO/CF-binding dye is a malachite green dye, such as malachite green, Brilliant green (dye), and Brilliant Blue FCF. In some embodiments, the gO/CF-binding dye is a Victoria blue dye, such as Victoria Blue B, Victoria Blue FBR, Victoria blue BO, Victoria Blue FGA, Victoria blue 4 R, and Victoria blue R.
A number of possible routes can be used to prepare methyl violet dyes, such as crystal violet. The original procedure involved the reaction of dimethylaniline with phosgene to give 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)benzophenone as an intermediate. This was then reacted with additional dimethylaniline in the presence of phosphorus oxychloride and hydrochloric acid.
The dye can also be prepared by the condensation of formaldehyde and dimethylaniline to give a leuco dye:
CH2O+3C6H5N(CH3)2→CH(C6H4N(CH3)2)3+H2O
This colorless compound can then be oxidized to the colored cationic form: (A typical oxidizing agent is manganese dioxide).
CH(C6H4N(CH3)2)3+HCl+1/2O2→[C(C6H4N(CH3)2)3]Cl+H2O
RF-Binding Dyes
In some embodiments, the disclosed compositions, kits and methods can further comprise dyes that preferentially respond to RF amyloids, such as thioflavin T, congo red, NIAD-4 dye, or an RF-binding derivative thereof.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
A kinetic assay that clearly delineates growth conditions dominated by gO/CF or RF formation as simple function of protein concentration was developed. This kinetic assay was used in conjunction with high-resolution (AFM or TEM) imaging of aggregate morphologies to identify dyes that display well-defined selectivity of gO/CFs over RFs (
The basis of the kinetic assay is the existence of a “critical oligomer concentration” or COC, distinct from and higher than the protein concentration required for fibril growth [Tatiana Miti, et al. Biomacromolecules (2015) 16:326-335]. Using both hen-egg white lysozyme and a dimeric Aβ construct, it was shown that crossing this COC causes a sharp transition in ThT kinetics from the ubiquitous “sigmoidal” growth kinetics of nucleated polymerization to lag-free bimodal kinetics. The initial phase of bimodal growth is dominated by gO/CF formation while the secondary upswing indicates RF nucleation and growth [Filip Hasecke, et al. Chem. Sci. (2018) 9: 5937-5948]. When below this COC HEWL grows RFS aggregates with a distinct lag phase before the start of growth. Monitoring dye responses both below and above the COC allows rapid determination whether a given fluorescent dye responds only to the initial gO/CF or subsequent RF phase of amyloid growth.
Using this kinetic assay with HEWL at pH 2 the transition in growth with both ThT (control) and several other molecular rotor dyes were monitored. Crystal violet was shown to closely match the kinetics of the initial gO/CF phase in ThT kinetics, but displays very weak responses upon the onset of RF formation. This “globular oligomer indicator” (GOI) would therefore complement the kinetic information available from ThT and enable to cleanly separate gO/CF from RF kinetics.
There are two main categories of amyloid aggregates: Long, Rigid Fibrils (RFs,
Which of the species of aggregates is most disease-relevant is an ongoing question. The most common ways to confirm which species of amyloid aggregates have grown is with imaging (AFM, TEM), or with oligomer-specific antibodies (low time resolution). Being able to monitor which of these aggregates is forming during in vitro growth would be a powerful tool to understand the mechanisms underlying gO/CF vs. RF formation. Disclosed herein is a kinetic assay for screening dyes for their potential as selective indicators for either gO/CF or RF formation.
Kinetic transition is an indicator of oligomer formation (Hasecke F. et al., Chem. Sci., 2018 9:5937-5948). The onset of gO/CF formation is delineated by a threshold protein concentration referred to herein as the “critical oligomer concentration” or COC. Below the COC, RFs formation proceeds via nucleated polymerization and, therefore, displays sigmoidal growth kinetics with well-defined lag periods. No populations of gO/CFs are observed. In contrast, gO/CF formation above the COC has no lag periods and results in biphasic kinetics (saturating gO/CF kinetics is superimposed to sigmodal RF kinetics). AFM confirms that the initial phase represents gO/CF formation while the second phase indicates RF nucleation and growth. Using this transition from sigmoidal to biphasic kinetics provides an efficient assay for screening dyes for their response to these distinct aggregate species.
As disclosed herein, crystal violet is a globular oligomer indicator (GOI). As shown in
Significance
Accumulating evidence implicates small globular oligomers both as cause of and biomarker for the clinical symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Haass, C., et al. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol., 2007. 8:101-112; Lesné, S., et al. Nature, 2006. 440:352-357; Tomic, J. L., et al. Neurobiology of Disease, 2009. 35:352-358; Dahlgren, K. N., et al. J Biol Chem., 2002. 277:36046-36053; Cleary, J. P., et al. Nature Neuroscience, 2005. 8:79-84; Pigino, G., et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009. 106:5907-5912; Kayed, R., et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013. 33:S67-S78; Serrano-Pozo, A., et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med., 2011. 1:a006189). Efforts to translate this insight from basic research into clinical practice, however, suffer from a dearth of assays suitable for detecting and quantifying amyloid oligomers and their distributions ex vivo and, particularly, in vivo. Current techniques for detecting oligomers include atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Harper, J. D., et al. Chemistry and Biology, 1997. 4:119-125; Stine, W. B., Jr., et al. J Biol Chem., 2003. 278:11612-11622; Hill, S. E., et al. Biophysical Journal, 2009. 96:3781-3790), photo-induced cross-linking of unmodified proteins (PICUP) (Bitan, G., in Methods in Enzymology. 2006, Academic Press. p. 217-236), mass spectroscopy (Young, L. M., et al. J Am Chem Soc., 2014. 136:660-670), and most frequently immunostaining with conformation-dependent anti-oligomer antibodies (Kayed, R., et al. Molecular Neurodegeneration, 2007. 2:18; Kayed, R., et al., in Methods in Enzymology. 2006, Academic Press. p. 326-344). All of these methods suffer from limited temporal resolution, and only anti-oligomer antibodies are suitable for oligomer detection ex vivo (Schuster, J., et al., J Alzheimers Dis., 2016. 53:53-67). In addition, none of these approaches holds promise for detecting or imaging oligomers in vivo (e.g. via oligomer-selective PET tracers). This dearth of readily available and reliable probes of amyloid oligomers has prevented scientists from understanding the basic mechanisms underlying oligomer formation, from elucidating oligomer effects on cell viability, and from correlating disease symptoms with longitudinal studies of oligomer accumulation in vivo. These are all critical steps towards confirming the contributions of amyloid oligomers to AD and monitoring the efficacy of therapeutic interventions targeting AD oligomers.
One of the fundamental challenges in developing oligomer-selective assays is the inherent difficulty in isolating and stabilizing transient and metastable oligomer populations for use in screening assays. Ideally, one would like to isolate oligomers from patient tissue. However, while the presence of oligomers in vivo has been confirmed (Dimant, H., et al. Acta Neuropathol Commun., 2013. 1:1-10; Hwang, S. S., et al. Analytical Biochemistry, 2019. 566:40-45; Sancesario, G. M., et al. J Alzheimers Dis., 2012. 34:865-878), there are to our knowledge no approaches for isolating amyloid oligomers from patients or of growing and isolating them from animal models of AD. This limitation is compounded by the fact that there is no agreement yet under what conditions and in what cellular compartment these oligomeric species form in vivo. Therefore, development of new oligomer probes requires in vitro amyloid oligomers as substrate. Yet, even generating oligomers in vitro often involves non-physiological solution conditions and it is non-trivial to isolate and stabilize them for subsequent use as assay substrate. Such non-physiological solution conditions required for oligomer stabilization, in turn, can alter the responses of small molecules used in binding assays.
The approach taken for example circumvents the need for isolating oligomers by exploiting a transition in amyloid assembly kinetics from essentially oligomer-free to oligomer dominated fibril growth conditions (
Innovation
Our Kinetic Screening Assay Circumvents the Need to Isolate or Stabilize Metastable Oligomers
Instead of requiring isolation and stabilization of amyloid oligomers, the dye screening protocol proposed here takes the identification of two distinct amyloid assembly regimes with distinctly different assembly kinetics (see
“Biphasic Oligomers” Match Morphological, Tinctorial and Spectral Characteristics of Toxic Oligomers
As disclosed herein, oligomers and curvilinear fibrils generated during biphasic growth match the morphological, structural and tinctorial characteristics of toxic oligomers and curvilinear fibrils for multiple amyloid diseases, including Alzheimer's disease.
The Disclosed Assay Already Identified an Oligomer-Selective Dye for Lysozyme Amyloid Oligomers
To confirm the potential of the proposed screening approach, it was applied to a small subset of about one dozen fluorescent dyes using the model amyloid hen egg-white lysozyme. This identified crystal violet as oligomer-selective dye under these conditions. While highly promising, we need to identify dyes that recognize Ab oligomers, and do so under near-physiological conditions, which makes them immediately relevant to research and clinical use.
Dye Screening Assays Can Be Readily Extended to the AD Peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42
Conditions were identified for both Aβ40 and Aβ42 that result in the same kinetic transition from sigmoidal to biphasic growth under near-physiological solution conditions. The use of physiological condition for dye screening is important since dye responses tend to be highly sensitive to solution conditions.
OSDs Offer Many Short and Intermediate-Term Advantages Over Existing Modalities of Oligomer Detection
Identification of OSDs would provide an important addition to the limited range of modalities for oligomer detection, and for elucidating the biophysical mechanisms underlying oligomer formation in vivo. The utility of fluorescent dyes is highlighted by the commonly used amyloid fibril indicator thioflavin T (ThT). It offers superior temporal resolution and sensitivity and has been fundamental for developing molecular models of amyloid fibril assembly (Meisl, G., et al. Nature Protocols, 2016. 11:252-272; Knowles, T. P. J., et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011. 108:14746-14751; LeVine, H., et al. Amyloid, 1995. 2:1-6). Its uncharged variant thioflavin S is a frequently used histological amyloid stain. ThT has also served as template for the amyloid binding moiety of the first positron emission tomography (PET) fibril imaging probe (Pittsburgh compound B) in vivo (Klunk, W. E., et al. Annals of Neurology, 2004. 55:306-319). While the weak response of ThT to oligomers was exploited for the assay, its fluorescence response and binding affinity are highly skewed towards late-stage amyloid fibrils (Foley, J., et al. J Chem Phys., 2013. 139:121901). OSDs, in contrast, provides a sensitive fluorescence read-out for detecting and monitoring amyloid oligomer populations in vitro and in vivo (Wu, C., et al. Bioorg Med Chem., 2007. 15:2789-2796). OSDs also provide a favorable starting point for the design of antemortem oligomer detection assays. Similarly, OSDs can be immediately applied for high through-put screening of drugs targeting amyloid oligomers. Perhaps most importantly, just as the development of existing PET tracers utilized the structure of fibril-selective ThT (Klunk, W. E., et al. Annals of Neurology, 2004. 55:306-319), the identification of OSDs represent a highly promising starting point for developing oligomer-selective PET tracers for in vivo imaging. These are all critical steps towards early detection of AD oligomers and, by extension, of early stages of AD in patients. It will also provide essential tools for quantifying the effects of pharmacologic interventions in drug trials targeting Aβ oligomer populations.
Approach
The overall goal of the proposed research is to utilize the rational and efficient kinetics screening assay we developed to identify fluorescent dyes with highly selective responses to Aβ oligomers over fibrils from a library of existing fluorescent dyes. This approach was not only validated but generated data indicating that there are likely multiple already existing dyes that have selective for amyloid oligomers over fibrils.
Background
The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis and the Role of Amyloid Oligomers
While there is no universal consensus about what causes the clinical symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the predominant “amyloid cascade hypothesis” holds that aggregation of the Alzheimer peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 into fibrils initiates a cascade of downstream events resulting in the clinical symptoms of AD (Hardy, J. A., et al. Science, 1992. 256:184-185). The original fibril-centered hypothesis has since been revised significantly. The cascade hypothesis now accounts for the substantial evidence that amyloid oligomers, small precursors of the prominent late-stage fibril plaques, are critical contributors to and early biomarkers of the etiology of AD (Dahlgren, K. N., et al. J Biol Chem., 2002. 277:36046-36053; Selkoe, D. J., et al. EMBO Mol Med. 2, 2016. 8:595-608; Bitan, G., et al. Amyloid, 2005. 12:88-95; Kayed, R., et al. J Biol Chem., 2004. 279:46363-46366; Kayed, R., et al. Science, 2003. 300:486-489). Hence, understanding the mechanisms underlying oligomer formation in AD and developing assays for the detection of these toxic biomarkers of AD are critical to translate this insight from basic research into practical assays for the diagnosis of early stages of AD, for monitoring disease progression and, subsequently, for evaluating the success of behavioral or pharmacological interventions to halt the progression of this devastating disease.
Progress towards this goal is impeded by the limited ability to confirm where and under what conditions amyloid oligomers form in vivo. In fact, the critical relevance of amyloid oligomers to AD only emerged from in vitro experiments that detected these metastable early-stage precursors of fibrils using biophysical and biochemical techniques. The presence of oligomers in patients' brains was then confirmed using anti-oligomer antibodies—raised against oligomers generated in vitro. Until now, anti-oligomer antibodies remain the predominant modality for attempts at detecting amyloid oligomers ex vivo or in body fluids, and for assessing their spatial distribution throughout the brain (Tomic, J. L., et al. Neurobiology of Disease, 2009. 35:352-358; Savage, M. J., et al. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2014. 34:2884-2897; Koss, D. J., et al. Acta Neuropathologica, 2016. 132:875-895). Small molecule indicators for amyloid oligomers, instead, would provide a highly flexible platform for developing assays for elucidating the progression of oligomer formation under in vitro condition, for detecting amyloid oligomers in body fluids or animal models and, perhaps most importantly, as binding moiety for the development of novel oligomer-selective PET tracers for in vivo imaging.
The overall goal is to screen a library of small dye molecules for fluorescence enhancements upon binding to globular amyloid oligomers (gOs) and their associated curvilinear fibrils (CFs), instead of late-stage rigid fibrils (RFs). For the kinetic screening assay outlined below we do not need to isolate and stabilize these distinct amyloid aggregates species for subsequent dye binding studies. Instead, they emerge naturally as dominant aggregate species within distinct time windows during the assembly reaction (see
Findings
Introduced below is the kinetic transition in amyloid assembly upon onset of oligomer formation, observed with a dimeric Aβ40 construct (dimAβ) and hen egg-white lysozyme (hewL). Using this screening approach, the dye crystal violet was identified as an oligomer-selective dye (OSD). Next shows was that both of the Alzheimer peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 display that same kinetic transition upon oligomer formation, allowing extension of the dye screen to the AD-relevant peptides.
Oligomer Formation Induces a Sharp Transition from Sigmoidal to Biphasic ThT Kinetics
The proposed assay is based on the prior observation of a sharp transition, recorded with thioflavin T fluorescence, from sigmoidal to biphasic assembly kinetics as function of monomer or salt concentration, while keeping all other solution conditions fixed (
The Transition from Sigmoidal to Biphasic Kinetics can Identify Oligomer-Selective Dyes
Using the above transition in the model amyloid hewL a small subset of about one dozen dyes were screened for oligomer-selective responses. Oligomer-free sigmoidal kinetics provided the read-out for dye responses to pure fibril formation—relative to the ThT response recorded under the same conditions. Responsiveness of dyes to gO/CF formation was evaluated during the initial gO/CF phase of biphasic kinetics, as long as it was well separated from the second RF-related upswing. Even this very limited and fairly arbitrary set of dyes yielded three different dyes with a modest level of oligomer-specific responses (
Upon Oligomer Formation, the Alzheimer Peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 Display Biphasic Kinetics
The observations with dimeric Aβ40 strongly suggested that Aβ peptides do have a transition from oligomer-free, sigmoidal to oligomer dominated amyloid growth (see
For the dye screening assay it is highly favorable if the initial regime of biphasic kinetics is well separated in time from subsequent fibril nucleation and growth. Hence, Aβ40 under physiological conditions (
Oligomers Formed During Biphasic Growth Share Essential Characteristics of Toxic Oligomers
Aβ42 oligomers grown under biphasic conditions have been shown to react with the anti-oligomer antibody A11 and display the most prominent levels of cellular toxicity (Ladiwala, A. R. A., et al. J Biol Chem., 2012. 287:24765-24773). Similarly, the Prusiner and DeGrado labs have shown that oligomers of Aβ40 derived from biphasic growth are long lived and share structural features associated with toxic species (Nick, M., et al. Biopolymers, 2018:e23096). The morphological and spectroscopic characteristics of biphasic gO/CFs of hewL and dimAβ also match those reported for toxic oligomers in multiple amyloid disease (Hasecke, F., et al. Chemical Science, 2018. 9:5937-5948; Miti, T., et al. Biomacromolecules, 2015. 16:326-335; Foley, J., et al. J Chem Phys., 2013. 139:121901). As determined by AFM, the biphasic gOs display a well-defined globular morphology and progressively polymerize into curvilinear fibrils (CFs) with a characteristic “beads on a string” morphology (AFM panels in
Identify Oligomer-Selective Dyes (OSDs) with Kinetic Screening Assay
Overall Experimental Approach
The central part of the proposed experiments is the determination of dye responses to oligomer vs. fibril growth (i.e. early-stage biphasic vs. late-stage sigmoidal growth), and compare them to those of ThT (see
Preparation of Aβ and Dye Stock for Kinetic Growth Experiments
Lyophilized Aβ40 and Aβ42 stock (e.g. rPeptide, Watkinsville, Ga.) for dye screening assays will be dissolved in 100 mM NaOH (pH 12) and injected into a Superdex 75 10/300 GL column on an FPLC (Äkta Pure, GE) using 35 mM Na2HPO4 running buffer at pH 11. The monomer fraction is collected and kept on ice during subsequent sample preparation. Resulting Aβ monomer concentrations will be determined using optical absorption at 280 nm (ε280=(1,470±20) M−1cm−1) (Ghosh, P., A. et al. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010. 11:S6-24; Al-Hilaly, Y. K., et al Acta Neuropathol Commun., 2013. 1:83-100). This Aβ stock is then diluted into ice-cold 35 mM Na2HPO4 at pH 11 to the highest Aβ concentration used in experiments and the pH is adjusted to pH 7.4 by addition of 1.5% (by vol) of 1M NaH2PO4.
Dye stock solutions are prepared at a typical concentration of 1 mM dye in either distilled water or an appropriate solvent and passed through 220 nm syringe filters. When available, optical absorption coefficients (e.g. ε412(ThT)=28,800 M−1 cm−1) will be used to confirm actual dye stock concentrations. Dyes will be diluted into protein solutions at a ratio of approx. 1:100 to a final concentration of 5-10 μM. Dye solvents other than water will be monitored separately for their potential effect on amyloid assembly by running a “dye free” solvent control, with ThT as read-out to confirm unaltered aggregation kinetics (
Dye Selection Criteria
There are literally tens to hundreds of thousands of dyes one could potentially choose from. Two strategies can be used in dye selection: use already existing amyloid dyes or dyes with potential for oligomer selectivity, or randomly select a subset of dyes from available dye collections. There are multiple dyes that have been suggested to have oligomer selectivity including polarity-sensitive dyes and molecular rotors
Molecular Rotors are widely used amyloid indicator thioflavin T (ThT) belongs to the broad class of molecular rotors with two moieties linked by a rotating bond (Haidekker, M. A., et al., in Chemistry and Biology I: Fundamentals and Molecular Design, A. P. Demchenko, Editor. 2010, Springer Verlag: Berlin. p. 267-308; Haidekker, M. A., et al. J Biol Eng., 2010. 4:11). 9-(Dicyanovinyl) Julolidine (DCVJ) can be included, which has been reported to have some oligomer selectivity (Nagarajan, S., et al. ChemBioChem, 2017. 18:2205-2211). Other molecular rotors to be included are aniline nitriles such as 1,4-dimethylamino benzonitrile (DMABN) and stilbenes such as p-(dimethylamino) stilbazolium (p-DASPMI) and Rhodamine B.
Polarity-Sensitive Dyes can be use. 1-Anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS) is frequently used in amyloid aggregation to probe the formation of hydrophobic intermediates (Younan, N. D., et al. Biochemistry, 2015. 54:4297-4306). Therefore, ANS, Bis-ANS, Nile Red and other indicator dyes of hydrophobicity are natural choices in our selection.
Triarylmethane Dyes can be used. Preliminary OSD crystal violet (CV) is a triarylmethane dye. It is best known for staining the peptidoglycan-rich membranes of gram-positive bacteria (Gram, H. C., et al. Fortschritte der Medizin, 1884. 2:185-189). It has previously been identified as a weak metachromatic amyloid stain (Cooper, J. H., J Clin Pathol., 1969. 22:410-413), consistent with the weak fibril response we observe. We will screen at least five additional triarylmethane dyes. This class of dyes is also attractive since several of its members are biocompatible.
Random Selection can be used. Since there are no rational criteria yet to predict dye fluorescence responses to binding or any available oligomer structure to use in binding algorithms, a random subset of dyes from dye catalogs (Molecular Probes) or libraries (e.g. NC States' Max A. Weaver Dye Library) can be used in the dye screen.
Kinetic Dye Screening Assay
In a typical experiment, Aβ40 solutions are prepare at pH 7.4 using at least two Aβ concentrations below (e.g. 5 & 10 μM) and two concentrations above (e.g. 30 & 80 μM) the onset of oligomer formation. A 96 well half-area fluorescence plate (Corning, #3881) are filled with triplicates of each of the four Aβ40 concentrations for each of the dyes used in this screen. This allows for measurements of three different dyes, together with the corresponding ThT reference per assay. The remaining wells are used for controls of dye bleaching in buffer and dye solvent effects, for a total of 72 wells/assay (see
Data Analysis
The fluorescence dye traces are exported and analyzed using standard data analysis and plotting software (Igor, Wavemetrics). Dye responses will be averaged over their three identical replicas and dye selectivity will be evaluated by normalizing dye responses during biphasic gO/CF vs sigmoidal RFs growth to their fluorescence intensity at t=0 and plotting the ratio F/FO (see
Anticipated Outcomes and Potential Problems
The screening approach has already been validated with hewL and, as a result, identified crystal violet as OSD (see
Correlate OSD Responses to Aβ Oligomers with Immunoreactivity to Anti-Oligomer Antibodies
Tesults from the Tessier and Smith labs indicate that Aβ42 gO/CFs formed under biphasic growth conditions react with All anti-oligomer antibodies (Ladiwala, A. R. A., et al. J Biol Chem., 2012. 287:24765-24773). In addition, the morphological and spectroscopic features of “biphasic gO/CFs” closely match those of toxic oligomers. However, anti-oligomer antibodies are currently the only widely available and accepted read-out for detection of Aβ oligomers in vivo. Therefore, confirming the correlation between dye and antibody responses to “biphasic gO/CFs” strengthens the evidence that the gO/CFs emerging during biphasic growth are identical to those recognized by anti-oligomer antibodies in brain slices and these two approaches for Aβ oligomer detection provide complimentary information.
There are at least two oligomer-selective antibodies commonly used for Aβ oligomer detection: A11 (Kayed, R., et al., in Methods in Enzymology. 2006, Academic Press. p. 326-344; Kayed, R., et al. Science, 2003. 300:486-489) and F11G3 (Lasagna-Reeves, C. A., et al. eLife, 2015. 4:e07558; Guerrero-Muñoz, M. J., et al. Neurobiology of Disease, 2014. 71:14-23; Guerrero-Muñoz, M. J., Biochem Pharmacol., 2014. 88:468-478; Kayed, R, Mol Neurodegener., 2010. 5:57). The immuno-reactivity of both Aβ40 & Aβ42 gO/CF populations generated during biphasic growth to these two anti-oligomer antibodies is determine.
Generating and Isolating “Biphasic gO/CFs” of Aβ40 and Aβ42 Peptide
The dot-blot analysis with anti-oligomer antibodies does require generating and isolating biphasic gO/CF populations. To do so the procedure is followed for analysis of aggregate morphologies and structures with AFM and TEM (see
Dot-Blot Analysis of Anti-Oligomer Reactivity
For the dot-blot analysis the two commercially available anti-oligomer antibodies A11 and F11G3 (Kayed, R., et al., in Methods in Enzymology. 2006, Academic Press. p. 326-344; Kayed, R., et al. Science, 2003. 300:486-489; Guerrero-Muñoz, M. J., Biochem Pharmacol., 2014. 88:468-478; Lasagna-Reeves, C. A., et al. Biochemistry, 2010. 49:10039-10041) are used. Pairs of 5 μL aliquots of Aβ42 or Aβq40 solutions, incubated for different durations in the biphasic growth regime, are blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, dried and blocked with 10% nonfat milk in TBS, 0.01% Tween 20 for 1 hour. After washing membranes (3 times for 5 minutes) with TBS/0.01% Tween 20, the pairs of blots are exposed for 2 hours to A11 or F11G3 (1 μg/ml each) anti-oligomer antibodies, respectively. Following a second washing step, membranes are incubated with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000) at room temperature for 1 h. Antibody staining is quantified using the Super signal West pico chemiluminescence kit from Thermo Scientific and imaged on a Biorad ChemDoc-Touch Imaging System.
Anticipated Outcomes and Potential Problems
Since previous experiments already indicated the reactivity of A11 with biphasic gO/CFs (Ladiwala, A. R. A., et al. J Biol Chem., 2012. 287:24765-24773), this result is expected. However, there could be variability in the reactivity that these antibodies show to early-stage gOs versus their polymerized CF counterparts. Correlated AFM images permit evaluation of whether these antibodies recognized both types of gO-related populations or whether part of the anti-oligomer epitope becomes inaccessible upon polymerization into CFs. This, in and of itself would be an interesting finding. In addition, it is possible that A11 and F11G3 display distinct reactivity to Aβ40 vs. Aβ42 gO/CFs. If so, such select responses to oligomeric subspecies might be reflected in the fluorescence responses of a given OSD, as well. Structure-specific dye responses have been observed recently for Aβ fibrils (Condello, C., et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018. 115:E782-E791). Such variability would make OSDs an even more versatile tool for detecting and characterizing Aβ oligomers.
Validation and Characterization of OSDs
Dyes identified as potential OSDs by the kinetic assay are subjected to additional scrutiny and characterization. Specifically, “false positives” i.e. dyes that selectively inhibit RF growth and, thereby, mimic preferential affinity for gO/CFs, are excluded. Fluorescence spectra of OSDs bound to gO/CFs are determine. Any spectral shifts upon binding would further improve specificity of OSD responses to oligomers over unrelated environmental factors altering their fluorescence intensity only. Whether any given OSD can be used with ThT to separate in vitro Aβ amyloid growth into its underlying gO/CF and RF components is evaluated. This would provide a new screening assay for monitoring the separate effects of drugs on oligomer vs. fibril populations.
Excluding Fibril Inhibitors as False Positives
The kinetic assay might identify “false positives”, i.e. dyes for which the apparent oligomer-selectivity arises from dye-mediated inhibition of RF kinetics, instead (Necula, M., et al. J Biol Chem., 2007. 282:10311-10324). Since the goal is to find dyes with select staining of existing oligomers over fibrils, dyes are excluded which are fibril growth inhibitor, instead. Two approaches are used to test during with lysozyme and crystal violet: competitive inhibition and direct AFM imaging. For competitive inhibition a solution under sigmoidal growth conditions is incubate with ThT only and with ThT and series of increasing concentration of added OSD. Any fibril inhibitor can alter not only the amplitudes but also slow the time course of ThT responses (lag periods, rise time etc). To discriminate changes in the time-dependent ThT fluorescence from reduced ThT amplitudes due to competitive binding of the OSD to fibrils, the fractional ThT responses are determined for each OSD concentration
Δ(ThT)=(ThT(t)−ThT[0])/(ThT(max)−ThT[0])
and plotting those curves on top of each other. A tight superposition suggests that the given OSD does not alter RF kinetics significantly—at least up to some critical value (see
Fluorescence Spectra of OSDs Upon Binding to gO/CFs
the excitation and emission spectra for potential OSDs bound to Aβ40 gO/CFs is determined. As known for ThT, fluorescence spectra in the amyloid-bound state can shift noticeably relative to their unbound state (Singh, P. K., et al. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51:14042-14045). To determine OSD spectra in their bound state, Aβ40 is incubated under biphasic growth conditions that result in an extended gO/CFs plateau. However, solutions are placed into a sealed small-volume fluorescence cuvette and incubated in the temperature-controlled sample chamber of a spectrofluorometer (Fluoromax-4, Horiba). OSD fluorescence spectra is acquired using the unbound excitation/emission values. Once the initial plateau phase is reached, though, the kinetic measurement are stopped and the relevant excitation/emission spectra in the presence of gO/CFs determined using the following iterative process. Using the initial excitation wavelength, an emission spectrum is acquired over a wide range of wavelengths. Next an excitation spectrum is acquired using the peak wavelength identified in the previous emission scan as detection wavelength. This procedure is repeated until no further optimization of the peak excitation/emission values is observed. Comparing the initial dye spectra to those obtained during the gO/CF phase will indicate whether the given OSD does undergo a spectral shift.
Separating gO/CF from RF Kinetics Using Simultaneous OSD and ThT Recordings
One immediate application of OSDs is their use in high throughput screening of drug compounds targeting Aβ oligomer formation. However, it would be significantly more useful to monitor the effect of a given drug on both gO/CF and RF populations simultaneous, and in the process determine how an effect on e.g. oligomer formation affects fibril formation or vice versa. Simultaneous measurements of OSD and ThT fluorescence could provide such an assay. There are several criteria an OSD has to meet for simultaneous recordings, though. First of all, OSD excitation or emission (or both) wavelengths need to be sufficiently different from ThT to avoid an overlap in their responses. Similarly potential effects of a given OSD on the assembly process itself or its associated ThT signal should be excluded. The above two types of dye characterization will have addressed those concerns already. Here determination is made whether simultaneous recordings of OSD and ThT signals from Aβ40 solutions undergoing biphasic growth permit separating these two fluorescence signals into their underlying gO/CF and RF components. The same protocol we established for CV and ThT during sigmoidal RF vs. biphasic gO/CF and RF formation (see
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of skill in the art to which the disclosed invention belongs. Publications cited herein and the materials for which they are cited are specifically incorporated by reference.
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/779,676, filed Dec. 14, 2018, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government Support under Grant No. GM097723 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/066355 | 12/13/2019 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62779676 | Dec 2018 | US |