Patent Grant
7605121
The present invention relates to the preparation of a lyophilizate of a peptide and the use of the lyophilizate in the treatment of infertility and to provide male gonad protection.
Cetrorelix is a decapeptide with a terminal acid amide group that is used in the form of its acetate salt. The synthesis and some pharmacological effects are described in European patent application 299 402 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,191).
It should be possible to administer the active substance subcutaneously in a dose of 0.1 to 20 mg. Aqueous solutions of the decapeptide are unstable, and, therefore, autoclaving in the container used to distribute it is not possible. During conventional sterilization, using the prescribed conditions, the decapeptide tends to decompose. To obtain an injectable solution it was therefore necessary to develop a lyophilizate.
The amount of active substance in the solution to be lyophilized is, however, so small that, in low active substance concentrations, only a loose fluff results on the glass wall of the ampoule after drying the solution free of auxiliary substances, and this fluff is carried out of the vial with the stream of water vapor generated by the sublimation process. It is therefore necessary to use a bulking agent that forms a stable cake. In high concentrations, this auxiliary substance can be dispensed with. The following auxiliary substances may be considered as bulking agents: hexitols, in particular mannitol, glucitol, sorbitol, such as D-sorbitol, dulcitol, allitol, altritol (for example D- and L-altritol), iditol (for example D- and L- iditol), their optically active forms (D- and L-forms) as well as the corresponding racemates. Nannitol is used in particular, such as D-mannitol, L-mannitol, DL-mannitol, sorbitol and/or dulcitol, and, of these, D-mannitol is preferred. The hexitol used may also be composed of a mixture of the hexitols named, for example a mixture of mannitol and sorbitol and/or dulcitol. Since dulcitol is less water soluble than, for example, mannitol, the dulcitol content in the aqueous solution should not exceed, for example, 3 percent by weight. Mannitol and sorbitol, on the other hand, can for example be mixed in any ratio.
Apart from hexitol it is also possible to add other, conventional pharmaceutical auxiliary substances, such as amino acids, such as alanine, glycine, lysine, phenylalanine, asparaginic acid, glutaminic acid, leucine, lactose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, glucose, fructose, albumin and equivalent bulking agents. Urea and sodium chloride may also be used as bulking agents. The total amount of such substances in the solution which is used for freeze-drying, is for example 0-16.9 parts by weight, for example 0.1-7 parts by weight, based on 1 part by weight of cetrorelix. In the finished lyophilizate the total amount of such auxiliary substances may be up to 16.9 parts by weight, based on one part by weight of hexitol. In detail, the amount of such auxiliary substances depends on the amount of hexitol present and to such an extent that the total amount of hexitol and such other auxiliary substances in the finished lyophilizate may not be more than a maximum of 17 parts by weight, based on 1 part by weight of cetrorelix. If only 0.1 part by weight of hexitol is present in the lyophilizate, it is thus possible to have up to 16.9 parts by weight of other auxiliary substances;
if, for example, 8.5 parts by weight of hexitol are present, the amount of other auxiliary substances may for example be up to 8.5 parts by weight, based on 1 part by weight of cetrorelix.
It was, however, found, during development work on the lyophilizate, that the active substance behaves in a widely variable and unpredictable manner during processing. The first batches gave good results, but it soon transpired that difficulties occurred during sterile filtration and faulty batches resulted.
It is known from the literature, for example from Powell, M. F.; Pharmaceutical Research, 1258-1263 (8)1991; Dathe, M: Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 344-349 (36) 1990; Szejtli, J.: Pharmaceutical Technology International 16-22, 1991 that oligopeptides, particularly those with terminal acid amide function, tend to form gels. During sterile filtration this is apparent from the speed of filtration, indeed the increased viscosity of such solutions can often already be detected organoleptically. A gelatinous layer remains on the sterile filter. It is then no longer possible to prepare a medication with an exactly and reproducibly defined active substance content.
Table 1 lists various results of the first 11 batches.
The active substance contents fluctuate between 100% and 36%.
To avoid this gel formation, the literature lists the following additives which may be tried out on an experimental basis:
Organic solvents may be considered, for example acetonitrile, n-butanol, tertiary butanol, ethanol, isopropanol, octanol and benzyl alcohol. It is also possible to use salts and buffer solutions, such as acetate buffer, citrate buffer, sodium chloride, sodium phosphate, sodium EDTA, sodium bicarbonate, phosphate buffer, guanidine acetate, urea.
Polymers may also be used, such as gelatin, polyethylene glycol 600, hydroxyethyl starch, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol. The use of amino acids, for example alanine, glycine, lysine, phenylalanine, asparaginic acid, glutaminic acid and leucine has also been described. Acids that were used were citric acid, caprylic acid, octanoic acid, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid and acetic acid. Physiologically acceptable surfactants that may be used are benzalkonium chloride, cetyl alcohol, bile acids, lecithins, polysorbates, Spans® and Pluronics®.
Carbohydrates and cyclodextrins such as glucose, lactose, mannitol, saccharose, alpha-, beta- and gamma cyclodextrins, hydroxypropyl-alpha- and beta-cyclodextrins, hydroxyethyl cyclodextrins and methyl cyclodextrins have already been used. These auxiliary substances were tested as filtration supporting agents to prevent gel formation.
No satisfactory solution of the problem could, however, be found. Only acidification with acetic acid showed partial success. Here, too, it was, however, always necessary to accept high filtration losses.
It was then surprisingly found that peptides having 3-15 amino acids such as cetrorelix can be easily dissolved in 30% volume/volume acetic acid. The solution is then diluted to a final concentration of 3% peptide, e.g., cetrorelix, with water for injection purposes and mannitol is added. Although it is stated in the literature that the terminal amide group hydrolyzes easily in acid medium, this was not found in the case of cetrorelix. Solutions prepared according to this method caused no difficulties during filtration. The correct amounts of active substance were always found.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, a peptide which contains 3-15 amino acids is dissolved in acetic acid to form a solution containing 100-10,000 parts by weight of acetic acid for each part of peptide, the solution is transferred to water, and the resulting solution is lyophilized.
The filtration speed of the acetic acid solution attains values that ensure satisfactory production sequences. A general process for sterile lyophilization is described in pages 557-559 of Sucker, Fuchs and Speiser (Publishers) “Pharmazeutische Technologie” 2nd edition 1991, Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart-New York. A further description of the lyphilization process used is given in German published specification (DOS) 37 35 614 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,335).
The lyophilizate is used in the treatment of female sterility. One therapeutic process has hitherto consisted in stimulating follicle maturation using human menopause gonadotrophin and then triggering ovulation by administering human chorion gonadotrophin. The ovulation triggered thereby occurred 32 hours later. The resulting ova are available for in vitro fertilization.
A disadvantage of this treatment with agonists is the fact that up to 10 follicles mature during the stimulation phase. This elevated follicle maturation leads to hormone level peaks in the LH. These peaks result in an early stage of follicle maturation and ovulation at an unpredicted point in time. This impaired ovulation occurs in about 25% of treated cases and is a disadvantage since the cycle that displays disturbed ovulation of this kind cannot be used for the collection of ova and the entire treatment has to be repeated about 1 month later.
Another disadvantage of the conventional simulation treatment and the use of LHRH agonists in order to avoid premature LH-peaks is the long treatment duration of 4 weeks which is needed to achieve satisfactory suppression. The agonists continue to display a hyperstimulation syndrome in 1-2% of cases in which the follicle cells hypertrophy. The risk of hyperstimulation is particularly great in the case of polycystic ovaries. The hyperstimulation syndrome is a severe side effect which can lead to fatalities.
It has now been found that the antagonist cetrorelix displays the following advantages in this treatment:
Treatment with cetrorelix over 5 days is sufficient to achieve total suppression. The premature LH peaks cannot arise and the frequency of hyperstimulation syndrome should be reduced. In addition, less HMG is used in the 2nd phase of therapy, the ovulation triggering phase. This gives this in-vitro fertilization treatment a not inconsiderable cost advantage. In-vitro fertilization is, for example, used when a tube anomaly is present. To perform this treatment it is necessary to precisely monitor the cycle and to establish the time of ovulation as precisely as possible. This has hitherto only been achieved to a limited extent since preovulatory LH increase often occurred too early due to simulation with HMG/HCG, or was not maintained for a sufficiently long period. Avoidance of this premature increase is, however, of critical importance for the success of the treatment in order to precisely determine the time of fertilization. This reduces the physical and mental burden on the patient and makes optimum use of hospital logistics. To achieve this objective with great reliability it is necessary to suppress endogenous hormone production (LH-FSH, oestradiol) as completely as possible in order to simultaneously stimulate follicle maturation through administration of exogenous gonadotrophins (HMG/HCG) and to monitor the hormone status at any time. It is only when a sufficiently large number of follicles have been achieved (4-6), having approximately the same degree of-maturation, that ovulation is triggered by administering an HCG bolus injection.
Use of an antagonist makes treatment substantially more successful and safer for the patient.
Another area of use of the cetrorelix lyophilizate according to the present invention is to protect the gonads in male patients. Male patients are pre-treated with cetrorelix lyophilizate and the activity of the gonads is reinforced. As a result, other harmful noxious agents, such as radiation therapy or treatment with cytostatics, have no or only a small possibility of affecting the sensitive tissue of the gonads.
The following Examples illustrate the invention.
Approx. 1.5 liters of water for injection purposes are prepared in a suitable glass vessel. 210 g water for injection purposes are prepared in another glass vessel and 91.17 g acetic acid are added. The amount of cetrorelix acetate calculated (1.62-1.695 g, depending on the content of the batch used) is dissolved in the prepared 30% acetic acid with stirring. This solution is transferred to the glass vessel with 1.5 liters of water for injection purposes, 82.2 g mannitol are added, dissolved and made up to 3039 g with water for injection purposes.
In-process checks:
The solution is sterilized by filtration through an appropriate membrane filter (pore size 0.2 μm) under aseptic conditions. 100 ml first runnings should be discarded. The filters should be sterilized with superheated steam before sterile filtration. Cetrorelix freeze-dried solution should be protected from recontamination during storage.
The solution is immediately filled into colorless injection bottles DIN 2R, hydrolytic class I under aseptic conditions and provided with sterile freeze-drying stoppers. The nominal filling amount is 2.0 ml=2.026 g.
The 2 ml injection bottles were rinsed in an injection bottle washing machine, dried with hot air and sterilized. The cleaned, freeze-drying stoppers were autoclaved. The closed injection bottles were transferred to a freeze-drying installation and frozen at a plate temperature of −40° C. Drying was carried out using a drying program with a plate temperature of −40° C. rising to +20° C. The installation is then flooded with sterile nitrogen, the bottles are closed in the installation and the stoppers secured with crimped caps.
The injection bottles are checked visually for faulty closures and outer faults. Faulty injection bottles are removed and destroyed.
Cetrorelix lyophilizate 1 mg is a white, solid, freeze-dried cake in a colorless 2 ml injection bottle which is closed with gray freeze-drying stoppers and yellow flip-off crimped caps.
420 g water for injection purpose are prepared in a suitable vessel and 121.56 g acetic acid are added. The amount of the nonapeptide (about 3.783 g, depending on the content of the batch used) is dissolved in the prepared 20% acetic acid and with stirring. 82., 2 niannitol are added and dissolved. This solution is sterilized by filtration through an appropriate membrane filter (pore size 0.2 μm) under aseptic conditions. The same membrane filter is used for the water for injection purpose to make up the solution to 3064 g. The filters should be sterilized with superheated steam.
The solution should be protected from recontamination during storage. The solution is filled in to sterile colorless injection bottles DIN 2 R, hydrolytic class I under aseptic conditions and provided with sterile freeze-drying stoppers. The nominal filling amount is 1.0 ml=1.022 g.
The 2 ml injection bottles were rinsed in an injection bottle washing machine, dried with hot air and sterilized. The cleaned freeze-drying stoppers were autoclaved. The injection bottles were transferred to a freeze-drying installation and frozen at a plate temperature of −40° C.
Drying was carried out using a drying programme with a plate temperature of −40° C. rising to +20° C. The installation is then flooded with sterile nitrogen, the bottles are closed in the installation and the stoppers are sealed with crimped caps.
The injection bottles are checked visually for faulty closures and outer faults. Faulty injection bottles are removed and destroyed.
The lyophilisate of the nonapeptide (1 mg) is a white, solid, freeze-dried cake in a colorless 2 ml injection bottle which is closed with grey freeze-drying stoppers and flip-off crimped caps.
Tripeptide (Protirelin)
143.5 g water for injection purpose are prepared in a suitable vessel and 61.5 g acetic acid are added. The amount of the Protirelin acetate calculated (equivalent to 800 mg of the peptide base) is dissolved with stirring. This solution is transferred to another vessel with approximately 1 l water for injection purpose. 109.6 g mannitol are added, dissolved and made up to 2048 g with water for injection purposes.
The solution is filled in to sterile colorless injection bottles DIN 2 R, hydrolytic class I under aseptic conditions and provided with sterile freeze-drying stoppers. The nominal filling amount is 1.0 ml=1.024 g.
The 2 ml injection bottles were rinsed in an injection bottle washing machine, dried with hot air and sterilized. The cleaned freeze-drying stoppers were autoclaved. The injection bottles were transferred to a freeze-drying installation and frozen at a plate temperature of −40° C.
Drying was carried out using a drying programme with a plate temperature of −40° C. rising to +20° C. The installation is then flooded with sterile nitrogen, the bottles are closed in the installation and the stoppers are sealed with crimped caps.
The injection bottles are checked visually for faulty closures and outer faults. Faulty injection bottles are removed and destroyed.
The Protireline lyophilizate (0.4 mg) is a white, solid, freeze-dried cake in a colorless 2 ml injection bottle which is closed with grey freeze-drying stoppers and flip-off crimped caps.
245 g water for injection purpose are prepared in a suitable vessel and 61.5 g acetic acid are added. The amount of somatostatine acetate calculated (0.52-0.66 g, dependent on the content of the batch used) is dissolved with stirring. This solution is transferred to another vessel with approximately 1 l water for injection purpose. 109.6 g mannitol are added, dissolved and made up to 2049 g with water for injection purposes.
The solution is filled in to sterile colorless injection bottles DIN 2 R, hydrolytic class I under aseptic conditions and provided with sterile freeze-drying stoppers. The nominal filling amount is 1.0 ml=1.024 g.
The 2 ml injection bottles were rinsed in an injection bottle washing machine, dried with hot air and sterilized. The cleaned freeze-drying stoppers were autoclaved. The injection bottles were transferred to a freeze-drying installation and frozen at a plate temperature of −40° C.
Drying was carried out using a drying programme with a plate temperature of −40° C. rising to +20° C. The installation is then flooded with sterile nitrogen, the bottles are closed in the installation and the stoppers are sealed with crimped caps.
The injection bottles are checked visually for faulty closures and outer faults. Faulty injection bottles are removed and destroyed.
The lyophilizate (0.25 mg somatostatine acetate) is a white, solid, freeze-dried cake in a colorless 2 ml injection bottle which is closed with grey freeze-drying stoppers and flip-off crimped caps.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| P4305225 | Feb 1993 | DE | national |
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/153,640, filed May 24, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,191 B2, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/040,457 filed Jan. 9, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,863,891 B2, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/468,145, filed on Jun. 6, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,828,415 B2, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/198,037, filed Feb. 22, 1994, abandoned, which claims priority to German Patent Appl. No. P 4305225.8, filed Feb. 19, 1993.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3816386 | Hedlund et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 4372884 | Brown et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4504414 | Folkers et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4512923 | Flegel et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4565804 | Rivier et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4693993 | Stewart et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4701499 | Kornreich et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4711877 | Moore | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4716242 | Engel et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4800191 | Schally et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4908475 | Callahan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5198533 | Schally et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5204335 | Sauerbier et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5268360 | Yashikawa et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5446033 | Engel et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5663145 | Engel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5728738 | Engel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5750131 | Wichert et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5773032 | Engel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5945128 | Deghenghi | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5968895 | Gefter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5998377 | Engel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6022860 | Engel et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6054555 | Engel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6106805 | Engel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6300313 | Engel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319192 | Engel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6627609 | Bernd et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6740634 | Saikawa et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6780972 | Damm et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6828415 | Engel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6867191 | Engel et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7005418 | Riethmuller-Winzen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7098305 | Deghenghi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7148195 | Bernd et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7214662 | Sarlikiotis et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7300935 | Cho et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7388032 | Saikawa et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393834 | Bouchard et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 20020099018 | Engel et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103113 | Engel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198146 | Damm et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198186 | Engel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030100509 | Sarlikiotis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040138138 | Engel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259801 | Damm et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266695 | Bernd et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050032831 | Kozikowski et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049200 | Bouchard et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124546 | Engel et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159335 | Bauer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060281685 | Bernd et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070161571 | Sarlikiotis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196416 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080145383 | Zauner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255053 | Riethmuller-Winzen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 141 996 | Jun 1980 | DE |
| 88-308573 | Sep 1988 | EP |
| WO 9119743 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO 9413313 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO 9515767 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050124546 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10040457 | Jan 2002 | US |
| Child | 10153640 | US | |
| Parent | 08468145 | Jun 1995 | US |
| Child | 10040457 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10153640 | May 2002 | US |
| Child | 11039997 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 08198037 | Feb 1994 | US |
| Child | 08468145 | US |
