Omeprazole formulation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6780435
  • Patent Number
    6,780,435
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 23, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A pharmaceutical composition of omeprazole for oral administration is described which consists essentially of:(a) a pellet comprising an inert core component, a therapeutically effective amount of omeprazole, a surface active agent, a filler, a pharmaceutically acceptable alkaline agent and a binder; and(b) a single layer of coating on said pellet which comprises a layer of an enteric coating agent.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a stable formulation of omeprazole. It is well known that omeprazole is sensitive to acidic conditions and the after contact with an acid, omeprazole will degrade and will not function in its intended manner. Initially, alkaline materials were added to a core of omeprazole and later an enteric coating was applied over the core to prevent the omeprazole from contacting the acidic pH conditions of the stomach. This approach is satisfactory if the product is administered within a short time after it is manufactured but if the product is stored under ambient conditions, the acidic residue of the enteric coating appears to degrade the omeprazole before it is administered to a patient. To solve this problem, the prior art has used a separate layer of a coating agent to coat a pellet core which contains omeprazole and an alkaline material which is thereafter coated with the enteric coating. This technique is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,505.




This dual layer coating technique requires the application of two separate functional coating operations which increases the length of the manufacturing process and the cost of the product. The applicants have surprisingly discovered a coating system which avoids the need to use a coating layer to separate the omeprazole core from the enteric coating layer in an omeprazole dosage form. The separate coating system is based on the combined use of an enteric coating agent which is applied to pellet cores of omeprazole as a suspension in an suitable solvent.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a novel dosage form of omeprazole which consists essentially of:




(a) a pellet comprising an inert core component, a therapeutically effective amount of omeprazole, a surface active agent, a filler, a pharmaceutically acceptable alkaline agent and a binder; and




(b) a single layer of coating on said pellet which comprises a layer of an enteric coating agent.




Accordingly, it is a primary object of this invention to provide a pharmaceutical dosage formulation of omeprazole which is stable upon prolonged storage, is stable when administered to a patient and is capable of providing the desired therapeutic effect.




It is also an object of this invention to provide a pharmaceutical dosage form of omeprazole which is bioequivalent to dosage forms of omeprazole which have an intermediate layer of an inert coating material.




It is also an object of this invention to provide a stable dosage form of omeprazole which may be produced without the need to provide an intermediate coating layer that separates the omeprazole containing core from the enteric coating layer.




These and other objects of the invention will become apparent from a review of the appended specification.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The omeprazole formulation of the invention is preferably based on pellets having a core forming inert component which may comprise a starch or sugar sphere such as nonpareil sugar seeds having an average size of from 14 to 35 mesh, preferably about 18 to 20 mesh. The core forming inert component is coated with a formulation which comprises omeprazole, a surface active agent, a filler, an alkaline material and a binder, which are collectively referred to hereafter as the drug layer composition. The core forming inert component is employed at 1:1 to 5:1 and preferably from 2:1 to 3:1 weight ratio to the drug layer composition.




The omeprazole may comprise from 20 to 70 wt % and preferably 40 to 50 wt % of the drug layer composition.




The surface active agent may be any pharmaceutically acceptable, non-toxic surfactant. Suitable surface active agents include sodium lauryl sulfate, polysorbate 20, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 80 and the like.




The surface active agent may be present at a level of from 0.1 to 5 wt % and preferably 0.25 to 2.5 wt % based on the total weight of the drug layer composition.




The alkaline material is selected from the group consisting of the sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and aluminum salts of phosphoric acid, carbonic acid, citric acid and aluminum/magnesium compounds such as Al


2


O


3


.6MgO.CO


2


.12H


2


O, (Mg


6


Al


2


(OH


1


-


6


CO


3


.4H


2


O), MgO.Al


2


O


3


.2SiO


2


.nH


2


O where n is a whole integer of 2 or more. In addition the alkaline material may be selected from the group consisting of antacid materials such as aluminum hydroxides, calcium hydroxides, magnesium hydroxides and magnesium oxide. The alkaline agent may be present at a level of 1 to 20 wt % based on the total weight of the coating composition, depending on the relative strength of the alkaline material. If the preferred disodium phosphate alkaline agent is employed, a level of from 1 to 10 wt % and preferably 4 to 7 wt % based on the weight of the drug layer composition may be employed.




The binder may be any pharmaceutically acceptable, non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable binder.




The binder is preferably a water soluble polymer of the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxymethyl cellulose and the like. A water soluble binder is preferred which is applied from an aqueous medium such as water at a level of from 0.1 to 5 wt % and preferably from 0.25 to 3 wt % of binder based on the total weight of the drug layer composition.




A filler is added to the drug layer. Sugars such as lactose, dextrose, sucrose, maltose, microcrystalline cellulose and the like may be used as fillers in the pellet coating composition. The filler may comprise from 20 to 70 wt % and preferably 40 to 50 wt % based on the total weight of the drug layer composition.




The enteric coating agent may comprise a acid resisting material which resists acid up to a pH of above about 5.0 or higher which is selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose phthalate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, carboxymethylethylcellulose, Eudragit L (poly(methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate), 1:1 ratio; MW (No. Av. 135,000-USP Type A) or Eudragit S (poly(methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate, 1:2 ratio MW (No. Av. 135,000-USP Type B) and mixtures thereof.




The enteric coating agent may also include an inert processing aid in an amount from 10 to 80 wt % and preferably 30 to 50 wt % based on the total weight of the acid resisting component and the inert processing aid. The inert processing aids include finely divided forms of talc, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate etc. Typical solvents which may be used to apply the acid resisting component-inert processing aid mixture include isopropyl alcohol, acetone, methylene chloride and the like. Generally the acid resistant component-inert processing aid mixture will be applied from a 5 to 20 wt % of acid resisting component-inert processsing aid mixture based on the total weight of the solvent and the acid resistant component-inert processing aid.




The cores are formed by spraying the non-pareil seeds with an aqueous or non-aqueous suspension which contains the alkaline agent, the omeprazole, the surface active agent and the binder. The suspension medium may comprise any low viscosity solvent such as water, isopropyl alcohol, acetone, ethanol or the like. When fluids such as water are employed, this will usually require a weight of fluid which is about seven times the weight of the dry components of the coating composition.




After the cores are dried, the cores are coated with the enteric coating agent. A color imparting agent may be added to the enteric coating agent mixture or a rapidly dissolving seal coat containing color may be coated over the enteric coating agent layer provided that the seal coat is compatible with and does not affect the dissolution of the enteric coating layer.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




EXAMPLE 1




Active pellets of omeprazole are formed by placing sugar spheres in a fluidized bed coater and spraying a suspension containing omeprazole onto the sugar spheres. The formulation for making the active pellets has the following composition:






















povidone, USP (Plasdone K90)




4.5 g








sodium lauryl sulfate, NF




10.6 g







lactose anhydrous, NF




427.7 g







disodium phosphate, NF




51.3 g







omeprazole, USP (micronized)




427.7 g







purified water, USP




3336.0 g















The povidone, lactose anhydrous, disodium phosphate and the purified water are mixed with a mechanical mixer until the materials are dissolved. Then the sodium lauryl sulfate is added to the mixture with gentle stirring to avoid the formation of excess foam until it dissolves completely. At that time the micronized omeprazole is added to the mixture and gentle stirring is continued until the micronized omeprazole is completely dispersed.




2500.0 g of non-pareil sugar spheres (USPXII) (18/20 mesh) are placed in the fluidized bed coater and the suspension containing the omeprazole is coated at a product temperature of 35-45° C.; an atomization pressure of 1.5 -3.0 bar and a pump rate of 2-50 ml/minute, starting with a slow rate of pumping to avoid agglomeration and increasing the rate of pumping consistent with the avoidance of the formation of agglomerates.




After coating is complete the pellets are dried at a temperature of 50° C. until the loss on drying is less than 2.5 wt % The pellets are then screened through a #14 mesh screen and coated with the following enteric coating formulation:






















hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate, NF




258.1 g








cetyl alcohol, NF




12.9 g







talc, USP




129.0 g







isopropyl alcohol, USP*




1663.0 g







acetone, NF*




1663.0 g













*evaporates during processing













The hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate and the cetyl alcohol are mixed with the isopropyl alcohol and the acetone with agitation until all of the materials are dissolved. The talc is dispersed with agitation in this solution. One kilogram of the active pellets are placed in a fluidized bed coater and all of the enteric coating mixture is applied using the coating conditions that were used to form the active pellets. The enteric coated pellets are then placed into No. “2”, hard gelatin capsules containing pellets which are equivalent to 20 mg of omeprazole.




The capsules were evaluated for stability as follows:




Dissolution Stability




After acid treatment for 2 hours in 500 ml of 0.1N HCl solution at 37° C., the test samples were tested according to the USP XXII dissolution test (type 1, basket) at 100 rpm, at 37° in phosphate buffer medium, USP XXII, at pH 6.8 to determine the percent of the drug dissolved versus time. The following results were obtained:


















Percent Dissolved















Time





40° C./




40° C./




40° C./






(min)




initial




75% RH/1 mo




75% RH/2 mo




75% RH/3 mo


















10




87




76




95




93






20




90




88




96




95






30




90




86




95




94






60




86




81




91




89














Chemical and Acid Resistance Stability




The acid resistance study was conducted by using the USP XXII dissolution test (type 1, basket), 100 rpm, 37° C., in a aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid at pH 1.0. The following results were obtained:






















40° C./




40° C./




40° C./







initial




75% RH/1 mo




75% RH/2 mo




75% RH/3 mo



















potency




101%




101%




100%




100%






(% of LC)






acid




 97%




100%




100%




 99%






resistance






(% of LC)














A biostudy was carried out to compare the product of Example 1 with Prilosec brand of omeprazole (Ref. Mean) in humans. The following results were obtained in fasting humans:





















Example





Ref.





Geometric




90% Confid.




Interv.


















1




Mean




% CV




Mean




% CV




ratio




low. lim




upp. lim





















Cmax




134.50




61.46




133.46




60.11




0.964




72.47%




128.19%






AUC 0˜t




224.38




68.94




214.61




66.24




1.040




96.08%




112.63%






AUC 0˜8




230.87




65.78




220.54




64.76




1.052




97.42%




113.62%






Tmax




2.33




39.90




1.92




44.93




1.232














All of the components which are used in the present invention are used in amounts which are effective for the intended purpose for which the component is employed.




While certain preferred and alternative embodiments of the invention have been set forth for purposes of disclosing the invention, modifications to the disclosed embodiments may occur to those who are skilled in the art. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to cover all embodiments of the invention and modifications thereof which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for preparing an omeprazole pellet that consists of:(a) applying a drug layer to an inert core wherein the drug layer consists of 20-70 wt % of omeprazole, 0.1-5 wt % of a surface active agent; 20-70 wt % of a filler, 1-20 wt % of a pharmaceutically acceptable alkaline agent and 0.1-5 wt % of a binder; (b) preparing a coating mixture that consists essentially of an enteric coating agent, an inert processing aid and a solvent selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, acetone, and methylene chloride; and (c) applying the coating mixture to the drug layer without the application of a layer to separate the drug layer from the coating mixture so that a coating layer is formed around the drug layer and wherein the coating layer consists essentially of 20-90 wt % of the enteric coating agent and 10-80 wt % of the inert processing aid.
  • 2. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the solvent is a combination of acetone and isopropyl alcohol.
  • 3. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the drug layer consists of 40-50 wt % omeprazole, 0.25-2.5 wt % surface active agent; 40-50 wt % filler, 1-10 wt % alkaline agent, 0.25-3 wt % binder.
  • 4. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the coating layer consists essentially of 50-70 wt % enteric coating agent and 30-50 wt % inert processing aid.
  • 5. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the drug layer consists of 40-50 wt % omeprazole, 0.25-2.5 wt % surface active agent, 40-50 wt % filler, 1-10 wt % alkaline agent, 0.25-3 wt % binder and the coating layer consists essentially of 50-70 wt % enteric coating agent and 30-50 wt % inert processing aid.
  • 6. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the enteric coating agent is selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxpropyl methylcellulose phthalate, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, carboxymethylethylcellulose, co-polymerized methacrylic acid/methacrylic acid methyl esters.
  • 7. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the alkaline agent is selected from the group consisting of the sodium potassium, calcium, magnesium and aluminium salts of phosphoric acid, carbonic acid and citric acid.
  • 8. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the alkaline agent is selected from the group consisting of aluminium hydroxides, calcium hydroxides, magnesium hydroxides and magnesium oxide.
  • 9. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the alkaline agent is disodium phosphate.
  • 10. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the inert core is a non-pariel sugar seed.
  • 11. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the omeprazole is micronized.
  • 12. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the inert processing aid is selected from the group consisting of talc, silicon dioxide and magnesium stearate.
  • 13. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, hydroxpropyl cellulose and hydroxymethyl cellulose.
  • 14. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the filler is selected from the group consisting of lactose, dextrose, sucrose, maltose and microcrystalline cellulose.
  • 15. The method recited in claim 9 wherein the disodium phosphate is 4-7 wt % of the drug layer.
  • 16. A method for preparing an omeprazole pellet that consists of:(a) applying a drug layer to an inert core wherein the dug layer consists of 40-50 wt % omeprazole, 0.25-2.5 wt % surface active agent, 40-50 wt % filler, 1-10 wt % alkaline agent selected from the group consisting of aluminium hydroxides, calcium hydroxides, magnesium hydroxides, magnesium oxide and sodium potassium, calcium, magnesium and aluminium salts of phosphoric acid, carbonic acid and citric acid and 0.25-3 wt % binder; (b) preparing a coating mixture that consists essentially of an enteric coating agent, an inert processing aid and a solvent selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, acetone, and methylene chloride; and (c) applying the coating mixture to the drug layer without the application of a layer to separate the drug layer from the coating mixture so that a coating layer that surrounds the drug layer is formed and wherein the coating layer consists essentially of 50-70 wt % of the enteric coating agent and 30-50 wt % of the inert processing aid.
  • 17. The method recited in claim 16 wherein the solvent is a combination of acetone and isopropyl alcohol.
  • 18. The method recited in claim 16 wherein the alkaline agent is disodium phosphate.
  • 19. The method recited in claim 18 wherein the disodium phosphate is 4-7 wt % of the drug layer.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/607,293, filed Jun. 30, 2000 now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/970,489, filed Nov. 14, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,340.

US Referenced Citations (51)
Number Name Date Kind
4045563 Berntsson et al. Aug 1977 A
4045564 Berntsson et al. Aug 1977 A
4182766 Krasso et al. Jan 1980 A
4255431 Junggren et al. Mar 1981 A
4337257 Junggren et al. Jun 1982 A
4359465 Ruwart Nov 1982 A
4432966 Zeitoun et al. Feb 1984 A
4508905 Junggren et al. Apr 1985 A
4544750 Brandstrom et al. Oct 1985 A
4620008 Brandstrom et al. Oct 1986 A
4636499 Brandstrom et al. Jan 1987 A
4686230 Rainer et al. Aug 1987 A
4738974 Brandstrom et al. Apr 1988 A
4786505 Lovgren et al. Nov 1988 A
4840799 Appeigren et al. Jun 1989 A
4853230 Lovgren et al. Aug 1989 A
5045321 Makino et al. Sep 1991 A
5093132 Makino et al. Mar 1992 A
5093342 Tomoi et al. Mar 1992 A
5178867 Guittard et al. Jan 1993 A
5204118 Goldman et al. Apr 1993 A
5219870 Kim Jun 1993 A
5232706 Polomo Coll Aug 1993 A
5244670 Upson et al. Sep 1993 A
5288506 Spickett et al. Feb 1994 A
5304540 Blackburn et al. Apr 1994 A
5330982 Tyers Jul 1994 A
5352688 Kaminski Oct 1994 A
5362424 Lee et al. Nov 1994 A
5385739 Debregeas et al. Jan 1995 A
5389664 Biale et al. Feb 1995 A
5399700 Min et al. Mar 1995 A
5417980 Goldman et al. May 1995 A
5433959 Makino et al. Jul 1995 A
5445839 Hagiwara et al. Aug 1995 A
5508041 Lee et al. Apr 1996 A
5518730 Fuisz May 1996 A
5599794 Eek et al. Feb 1997 A
5620964 Roth et al. Apr 1997 A
5622717 Fuisz Apr 1997 A
5637320 Bourke et al. Jun 1997 A
5639478 Makino et al. Jun 1997 A
5693818 Von Unge Dec 1997 A
5714504 Lindberg et al. Feb 1998 A
5753265 Bergstrand et al. May 1998 A
6077541 Chen et al. Jun 2000 A
6096340 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6174548 Chen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6248758 Klokkers et al. Jun 2001 B1
6296876 Odidi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6365184 Depui et al. Apr 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
1129417 Aug 1982 CA
1127158 Jul 1985 CA
1234118 Mar 1988 CA
1263119 Nov 1989 CA
1264751 Jan 1990 CA
1292693 Dec 1991 CA
2083605 Dec 1991 CA
1302891 Jun 1992 CA
2046364 Jan 1993 CA
1324758 Nov 1993 CA
2140347 Feb 1994 CA
2139653 Dec 1994 CA
2170250 Jan 1995 CA
2170647 Jan 1996 CA
2193681 Jan 1996 CA
1338377 Jun 1996 CA
2037101 Mar 1997 CA
2166794 Mar 1997 CA
2166483 Sep 1997 CA
124495 Jul 1984 EP
173664 Aug 1985 EP
0519144 Dec 1992 EP
1010423 Jun 2000 EP
1234058 Jun 1971 GB
9515059 Dec 1995 KR
WO 8503436 Aug 1985 WO
WO 9402140 Feb 1994 WO
WO 9501783 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9510264 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9512590 May 1995 WO
WO 9601612 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9601622 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9601623 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9601624 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9602535 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9624338 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9624375 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9637195 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9725065 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9853803 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9906032 Feb 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
L. Olbe, S.E. et al., Present Situation and Future Prospects of Medical Treatment, Gastrins and the Vagus, Academic Press p. 245-250, 1979.
Ekenved et al. Studies with H 168/68, a Novel Gastric Acid Secretion Inhibition., Gut, vol. 22, p. A877, No. 10, Oct. 1981.
Erik Fellenius et al., Substituted Benzimidazoles Inhibit Gastric Acid Secretion by Blocking (H+ + K+) ATPase, Nature, vol. 290, p. 159-161, Mar. 12, 1981.
Tore Lind, et al. Effect of Omenprazole—A Gastric Proton Pump Inhibitor on Pentagastrin Stimulated Acid Secretion in Man., Gut, vol. 24 p. 270-276, 1983.
K-Fr Sewin et al., Effect of Substituted Benzimidazoles on Acid Secretion in Isolated and Enriched Guinea Pig Parietal Cells., Gut, vol. 24 p. 557-560, Jun. 1983.
Haken Larsson et al., Inhibition of Gastric Acid Secretion by Omeprazole in the Dog and the Rat. Gastroenterology, vol. 85 p. 900-907, Oct. 1983.
Walter Londong et al. Dose-Response Study of Omeprazole on Meal Stimulated Gastric Acid and Gastrin Release., Gastroenterology, vol. 85 p. 1373-1378, Dec. 1983.
Stanislaw J., Effects of Omeprazole, a Substituted Benzimidazole, on Gastrointestinal Secretions, Serum Gastrin and Gastric Mucosal Blood Flow in Dogs., Gastroenterology, vol. 86 p 71-77 Jan. 1984.
D.A. Henry et al., Omeprazole: Effects on Oxidative Drug Metabolism., British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 18, p. 195-200, Aug. 1984.
B.K. Sharma et al. Optimal Dose of Oral Omerprazole for Maximal 24 Hour Decrease of Intragastric Acidity., Gut, vol. 25, p. 957-964, Sep. 1984.
H.P.M. Festen et al., Effect of Oral Omeprazole on Serum Gastrin and Serum Pepsinogen I Levels., Gastroenterology, vol. 87 p. 1030-1034, Nov. 1984.
Peter Prichard et al. Omerprazole: A Study of Its Inhibition of Gastric pH and Oral Pharmacokinetics After Morning or Evening Dosages., Gastroenterology, vol. 88, p. 64-69, Jan. 1985.
K.O. Borg and L. Obide, Omeprazole—A Survey of Preclinical Data., Gastroenterology, p. 15-22, 37-51, 71-77, 79-93, 105-120, Jun. 1985.
50th Edition of Physician's Desk Reference p. 529-531, 1996.
K.O. Borg, and L. Olbe, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Omeprazole Supplement to the Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, pp. 11-17, 31-38, 54-56, 59-60, 75-78, 89-135, 179, 182-183, 187-195, 1996.
Sep. 23, 1994 Decision of the Korean Patent Office Regarding Korean Patent No. 55426 (with Certified English Translation).
Korean Patent Application 92-17571 (with Certified English Translation) Sep. 26, 1992 Korean Patent Application assigned to Chong Kun Dang with Certified English Translation.
Declaration of Eugene T. Stevenson, Jr. Chief of Foreign Patents and Scientific Literature Branch at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Scientific and Technical Information Center.
Korean Open-Laid Patent No. 1016.
Response to the Appeal Trial Case for the Sep. 24, 1994 Decision (Korean Patent No. 55426) submitted by Choong Hwan Kim with Translator's Certificate.
Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 222 F. Supp. 2d., 423, 525-547 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/607293 Jun 2000 US
Child 10/279622 US
Parent 08/970489 Nov 1997 US
Child 09/607293 US