1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to radio communication systems and components. More particularly the invention is directed to antenna elements and antenna arrays for radio communication systems.
2. Description of the Prior Art and Related Background Information
Modern wireless antenna implementations generally include a plurality of radiating elements that may be arranged to provide a desired radiated (and received) signal beamwidth and azimuth scan angle. For an omni-directional antenna it is desirable to achieve a near uniform beamwidth that exhibits a minimum variation over 360 degrees of coverage. Differing from highly directional antennas an omni-directional antenna beamwidth is preferably nearly constant in azimuth. Such antennas provide equal signal coverage about them which is useful in certain wireless applications. However it is difficult to maintain a desired broad frequency bandwidth and also provide an omni-directional beamwidth.
Accordingly a need exists for an antenna design which expands the useful frequency bandwidth of an antenna element while providing nearly uniform omni-directional radiation pattern.
In a first aspect the present invention provides n omni-directional antenna comprising a first radiating element and a second radiating element oriented in generally opposite directions, a first parasitic radiating element configured between the first, and second radiating elements and spaced apart therefrom in a first direction, and a second parasitic radiating element configured between the first and second radiating elements and spaced apart therefrom in a second direction generally opposite to the first direction.
In a preferred embodiment the omni-directional antenna further comprises a generally planar dielectric support structure. The first radiating element and second radiating element are planar dipole radiating elements configured on the planar dielectric support structure. The first and second parasitic radiating elements are configured on opposite sides of the dielectric support structure and spaced apart therefrom. The first and second parasitic radiating elements are preferably spaced an equidistance from respective opposite sides of the dielectric support structure. The first and second parasitic radiating elements may comprise elongated conductive rods. In one embodiment the omni-directional antenna may further comprise third and fourth parasitic radiating elements, configured between the first and second radiating elements and spaced apart therefrom in the first and second directions, respectively. In such an embodiment, the first, second, third and fourth parasitic radiating elements may comprise generally parallel elongated conductive rods. More specifically, in a coordinate system defined such that the first and second directions correspond to opposite directions along a y axis, the first radiating element and second radiating element are oriented in opposite directions along an x axis, and a z axis is defined perpendicular to the x y plane, the generally parallel elongated conductive rods have a length dimension extending in the z direction. The first and third and second and fourth parasitic radiating elements are then preferably aligned along the y direction and symmetrically configured on opposite sides of the x axis. In an alternative configuration the first and third and second and fourth parasitic radiating elements may be respectively aligned along directions parallel to the x axis and symmetrically configured on opposite aides of the x axis.
In another aspect the present invention provides an omni-directional antenna structure comprising a radome, a planar dielectric substrate configured within the radome and having first and second dipole radiating elements configured thereon symmetrically disposed about a feed line, first and second conductive elements configured within the radome symmetrically arranged on opposite sides of the planer dielectric substrate and spaced, apart therefrom and a support structure holding the first and second conductive elements in that configuration.
In a preferred embodiment of the omni-directional antenna structure the first and second conductive elements may comprise conductive rods extending parallel to the feed line. The support structure may comprise first and second nonconductive support plates mounted within the radome and coupled to opposite ends of the conductive rods. The omni-directional antenna structure may further comprise third and fourth conductive elements configured within the radome and symmetrically arranged on opposite sides of the planar dielectric substrate and spaced apart therefrom.
In another aspect the present invention provides an omni-directional antenna structure comprising a radome, a planar dielectric substrate configured within the radome and having first and second dipole radiating elements configured thereon symmetrically disposed about a feed line and oriented to provide a radiation beam pattern in opposite azimuth directions, and means configured within the radome for parasitically augmenting the radiation beam pattern to provide substantially omni-directional azimuth radiation pattern.
In a preferred embodiment of the omni-directional antenna structure the means for parasitically augmenting the radiation beam pattern comprises symmetrically configured conductive elements on opposite sides of the dielectric substrate. As one example, the antenna operational radio frequency (RF) may be approximately 3.30 GHz to 3.80 GHz. The conductive elements may be spaced apart from the dielectric substrate by a distance of about 360 to 440 mils. The conductive elements may comprise conductive rods of diameter between about 160 to 250 mils. The conductive elements may comprise dual rods configured on each side of the dielectric substrate.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated from the following detailed description of the invention.
One object of the present invention is to provide dielectric based coplanar antenna elements which have broad frequency bandwidth and are easy to fabricate using conventional PCB processes. The present invention may preferably utilize a radiating element structure described in patent application Ser. No. 12/212,533 filed Sep. 17, 2008 and provisional patent application No. 60/994,557 filed Sep. 20, 2007, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In addition to coplanar radiating elements the present invention preferably takes advantage of pattern augmentation rods positioned in near proximity to the dielectric plane, equidistant to each surface side. To achieve an omni-directional radiation pattern a pair of symmetrically opposing radiating elements are preferably fed by a balanced feed network structure. The balanced feed structure provides equal signal division for each radiating element to achieve a symmetric radiation pattern. Additionally, a broad band balun is used to convert between a balanced feed network and an unbalanced, coaxial feed network.
In carrying out these and other objectives, features, and advantages of the present invention, a broad bandwidth antenna element is provided for use in a wireless network system.
Next a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described. Reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, which assist in illustrating the various pertinent features of the present invention. In certain instances herein chosen for illustrating the invention, certain terminology is used which will be recognized as being employed for convenience and having no limiting significance. For example, the terms “horizontal”, “vertical”, “upper”, “lower”, “bottom” and “top” refer to the illustrated embodiment in its normal position of use. Some of the components represented in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention.
As shown, omni-directional antenna element 100 is provided with an upper dielectric 12a (12b is a lower side of a dielectric) side RF unbalanced input-output port 106. Input RF signals are further coupled over balun 104 structure (details are omitted). A balun is an electromagnetic structure for interfacing balanced impedance device or circuit, such as an antenna, with an unbalanced impedance, such as coaxial cable or microstrip line. In its common use a balanced signal comprises a pair of symmetrical signals which are equal in magnitude and opposite in phase (180 degrees). In contrast, an unbalanced impedance may be characterized by a single conductor for supporting the propagation of unbalanced (i.e., asymmetrical) signals relative to a second conductor (i.e., ground). Numerous balun structures are known to those skilled in the art for converting the unbalanced to balanced signals and vice versa.
Thereafter, balanced RF signals are coupled onto 50 Ohm balanced impedance transmission line 102 (bottom side transmission line 112 is not visible) which is connected to 50 to 25 Ohm balanced ¼λ transformer comprising co-aligned bi-planar transmission lines 108, 118. Conventional implementation of a ¼λ transformer can readily utilize 35.3 Ohm characteristic impedance microstrip lines. Radiating elements' 10a, 10b characteristic load impedance is not the same as a conventional (73 Ohms) dipole known in the art. Instead, load impedance function of several variables such as parasitic coupling element spacing (30, 28) and mutual overlap o1, pattern augmentation rods 206, 208 positioning and diameter as well as several other variables to a lesser degree. Utilizing commercially available computer software (HFSS), radiating element 10a and 10b are optimized as a unit to provide an omni-directional radiation pattern as well as suitable load impedance (50 Ohms). Having 50 ohm load impedance greatly simplifies the feeding (110a-120a and 110b-120b) structure for each radiating element 10a, 10b. In a preferred implementation 50 Ohm balanced microstrip line (110a-120a and 110b-120b) pairs are used to feed respective radiating elements (10a, 10b) from the end of the ¼λ transformer 108, 118 from a common node (not labeled). The lengths of the 50 Ohm balanced microstrip line (110a-120a and 110b-120b) pairs also are, optimized to provide an omni-directional pattern among other parameters. Alternative feed implementations are possible that may provide additional benefits or circuit simplification.
A detailed description of a preferred embodiment of radiating element 10 can be found in patent application Ser. No. 12/212,533 filed Sep. 17, 2008 and provisional patent application No. 60/994,557 filed Sep. 20, 2007 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This embodiment provides a broadband capability as described in the above applications. Alternative designs for radiating elements 10 can be employed, however, especially where broad bandwidth is not important and a variety of radiating element designs will be possible as known to those skilled in the art.
With reference to
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conductive rods 206, 208 parasitically couple to the electromagnetic field of radiating elements 10a, 10b and have currents induced on their surface thereby becoming parasitic radiating elements. This provides an augmentation of the beam pattern from that of the elements 10 alone. More specifically, absent the radiation pattern augmentation rods 206 and 208 the beam pattern of radiating elements 10a, 10b would be bidirectional in nature, directed along the +/−x direction of
Performance of the omni-directional antenna 100 element equipped with a pair of radiation pattern augmentation rods 206 and 208 can be further modified which may provide improved performance in some applications. A single rod, can be replaced with pair of similarly constructed rods on each side of dielectric plate 12 to form a quad rod implementation. Quad rod implementations can be oriented horizontally (
Preferred dimensions for a 3.30 GHz to 3.80 GHz embodiment with 50 impedance source 106 impedance are as follows.
Results employing exemplary parameters were obtained.
The present invention has been described primarily in solving the aforementioned problems relating to expanding useful frequency bandwidth of a coplanar antenna element while providing a nearly uniform omni-directional radiation pattern. Furthermore, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Accordingly, variants and modifications consistent with the following teachings, and skill and knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiments described herein are further intended to explain modes known for practicing the invention disclosed herewith and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in equivalent, or alternative embodiments and with various modifications considered necessary by the particular application(s) or use(s) of the present invention.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/175,448 filed Jun. 7, 2016, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/470,064 filed May 11, 2012, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/287,661 filed Oct. 10, 2008, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/998,662 filed Oct. 12, 2007, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4812855 | Coe et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
6067053 | Runyon et al. | May 2000 | A |
6407719 | Ohira | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6670923 | Kadambi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6741219 | Shor | May 2004 | B2 |
6747605 | Lebaric et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6859176 | Choi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7132989 | Poilasne | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7215285 | Song et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7224315 | Tsai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7274339 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7298228 | Sievenpiper | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7391386 | Sawaya | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7646343 | Shtrom | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7696943 | Chiang | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7764245 | Loyet | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7986280 | Semonov | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8199064 | Semonov et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8319686 | Park | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8405567 | Park | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9368861 | Semonov et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20030054855 | Kojola et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030218571 | Yoon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231138 | Weinstein | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061652 | Ishihara et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090371 | Rossman | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125031 | Jo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040207562 | Schadler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060232492 | Sawatani | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290573 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070109198 | Saban et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080169993 | Matsuzawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090079653 | Semonov et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096698 | Semonov et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20120218168 | Semonov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20170012360 | Semonov et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4155359 | Sep 2008 | JP |
WO2009048614 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, U.S. Pat. No. 8,199,064, filed Oct. 10, 2008, Omni Directional Broadband Coplanar Antenna Element. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, U.S. Pat. No. 9,368,861, filed May 11, 2012, Omni Directional Broadband Coplanar Antenna Element. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/175,448, filed Jun. 7, 2016, Omni Directional Broadband Coplanar Antenna Element. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/212,533, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2011”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2011”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 15, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, Response filed Feb. 2, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,661, Response filed May 23, 2011 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Advisory Action dated Apr. 29, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 12, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Response filed Jun. 22, 2015 to Advisory Action dated Apr. 29, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Response filed Dec. 1, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Response Filed Dec. 4, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,064, Response filed Apr. 20, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/175,448, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016”, 11 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/010851, International Search Report dated Nov. 25, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/010851, Written Opinion dated Nov. 25, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/011655, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 11, 2008”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/011655, International Search Report dated Dec. 10, 2008”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/011655, Written Opinion dated Dec. 10, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170179578 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60998662 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15175448 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15451012 | US | |
Parent | 13470064 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 15175448 | US | |
Parent | 12287661 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 13470064 | US |