Patent Grant
11831564
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure as it appears in the United States Patent & Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present application is related to U.S. Patent Application Ser. Nos. 11/276,852 11/276,853; 11/276,854; 11/276.855; and 11/276,856 all filed on 16 Mar. 2006. Each of these cases is incorporated herein by reference as well as the corresponding PCT Applications where applicable.
The present disclosure relates to an on-demand compute environment and more specifically to a system and method of providing access and use of on-demand compute resources from a local compute environment.
Managers of clusters desire maximum return on investment, often meaning high system utilization and the ability to deliver various qualities of service to various users and groups. A cluster is typically defined as a parallel computer that is constructed of commodity components and runs as its system software commodity software. A cluster contains nodes each containing one or more processors, memory that is shared by all of the processors in the respective node and additional peripheral devices such as storage disks that are connected by a network that allows data to move between nodes. A cluster is one example of a compute environment, Other examples include a grid, which is loosely defined as a group of clusters, and a computer farm which is another organization of computers for processing.
Often a set of resources organized in a duster or a grid can have jobs to be submitted to the resources that require more capability than the set of resources has available. In this regard, there is a need in the art for being able to easily, efficiently and on-demand utilize new resources or different resources to handle a job. The concept of “on-demand” compute resources has been developing in the high performance computing community recently. An on-demand computing environment enables companies to procure compute power for average demand and then contract remote processing power to help in peak loads or to offload all their compute needs to a remote facility.
Enabling capacity on demand in an easy-to-use manner is important to increasing the pervasiveness of hosting in an on-demand computing environment such as a high performance computing or data center environment. Several entities can provide a version of on-demand capability, but there still exists multi-hour or multi-delays in Obtaining access to the environment. The delay is due to the inflexibility of transferring workload because the on-demand centers require participating parties to align to certain hardware, operating systems or resource manager environments. These requirements act as inhibitors to widespread adoption of the use of on-demand centers and make it too burdensome for potential customers to try out the service. Users must pay for unwanted or unexpected charges and costs to make the infrastructure changes for compatibility with the on-demand centers.
Often a set of resources organized in a cluster or a grid can have jobs to be submitted to the resources that require more capability than the set of resource has available. In this regard, there is a need in the art for being able to easily, efficiently and on-demand utilize new resources or different resources to handle a job. The concept of “on-demand” compute resources has been developing in the high performance computing community recently. An on-demand computing environment enables companies to procure compute power for average demand and then contract remote processing power to help in peak loads or to offload all their compute needs to a remote facility. Several reference books having background material related to on-demand computing or utility computing include Mike Ault, Madhu Tumma, Oracle 10 g Grid & Real Application Clusters, Rampant TechPress, 2004 and Guy Bunker, Darren Thomson, Delivering; Utility Computing Business-driven IT Optimization, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006.
In Bunker and Thompson, section 3.3 on page 32 is entitled “Connectivity: The Great Enabler” wherein they discuss how the interconnecting of computers will dramatically increase their usefulness. This disclosure addresses that issue. There exists in the art a need for improved solutions to enable communication and connectivity with an on-demand high performance computing center.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the disclosure. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the disclosure as set forth herein.
The disclosure relates to systems, methods and computer-readable media for controlling and managing the identification and provisioning of resources within an on-demand center as well as the transfer of workload to the provisioned resources. One aspect involves creating a virtual private cluster via a reservation of resources within the on-demand center for the particular workload from a local environment. Various embodiments will be discussed next with reference to example methods which can be applicable to systems and computer-readable media.
One aspect relates to a method of managing resources between a local compute environment and an on-demand environment. The method includes detecting an event associated with a local compute environment and, based on the detected event, identifying information about the local environment, establishing a communication with an on-demand compute environment and transmitting the information about the local environment to the on-demand compute environment. The system, at a first time establishes an advanced reservation of resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources. The timing of the advanced reservation is at a second time which is later than the first time. The system then provisions the reserved resources within the on-demand compute environment to substantially duplicate the local compute environment to yield provisional resources and transfers workload from the local compute environment to the reserved, provisional resources in the on-demand compute environment. The event can be a threshold associated with a job processing in the local compute environment or a triggering event within or outside of the local compute environment.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides for a method including generating at least one profile associated with workload that can be processed in a local compute environment, selecting at the local compute environment a profile from the at least one profile, communicating the selected profile from the local compute environment to the on-demand compute environment, reserving resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, provisioning the reserved resources within the on-demand compute environment according to the selected profile to yield provisional resources and transferring workload from the local-environment to the reserved, provisional resources in the on-demand compute environment.
The step of generating at least one profile associated with workload that can be processed in a compute environment can be performed in advance of receiving job requests on the local compute environment. Further, generating at least one profile associated with workload that can be processed in a compute environment can be performed dynamically as job requests are received on the local compute environment. There can be one or more profiles generated. Furthermore, one or more of the steps of the method can be performed after an operation from a user or an administrator, such as a one-click operation. Any profile of the generated at least one profile can relate to configuring resources that are different from available resources within the local compute environment.
Another aspect provides for a method of integrating an on-demand compute environment into a local compute environment. This method includes determining whether a backlog workload condition exists in the local compute environment and, if so, then analyzing the backlog workload, communicating information associated with the analysis to the on-demand compute environment, establishing an advanced reservation of resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, provisioning the reserved resources in the on-demand compute environment according to the analyzed backlog workload to yield provisional resources and transferring the backlog workload to the provisioned resources in the on-demand compute environment.
Yet another aspect of the disclosure relates to web servers. In this regard, a method of managing resources between a webserver and an on-demand compute environment includes determining whether web traffic directed to the webserver should be at least partially served via the on-demand compute environment, establishing an advanced reservation of resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, provisioning the reserved resources within the on-demand compute environment to enable it to respond to web traffic for the webserver and to yield provisional resources, establishing a routing of at least part of the web traffic from the webserver to the provisioned resources in the on-demand compute environment and communicating data between a client browser and the on-demand compute environment such that the use of the on-demand compute environment for the web traffic is transparent.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the disclosure briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended documents and drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the disclosure will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings.
Various embodiments are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations can be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
In order for hosting centers to obtain the maximum advantage, the hosting centers need to simplify the experience for potential customers, enable a fine-grained control over the sharing of resources and also dynamically adjust what is being provided based on each customer's needs. Additional intelligence control optimizes the delivery of resources so that hosting centers can lower costs and provide competitive offerings that will more easily be adopted and used.
This disclosure relates to the access and management of on-demand or utility, computing resources at a hosting center.
Throughout the description, the terms software, workload manager (WM), management module, system and so forth can be used to refer generally to software that performs functions similar to one or more of the Moab™ products from Cluster Resources, Inc., but are certainly not limited to the exact implementation of Moab™ (for example, the Moab Workload Manager®, Moab Grid Monitor®, etc.). Generally, the term “WM” can be used to relate to software that performs the steps being discussed. Such software provides a service for optimization of a local compute environment and according to the principles of the disclosure can also be used to control access to on-demand resources. In terms of local environment control, the software provides an analysis into how & when local resources, such as software and hardware devices, are being used for the purposes of charge-back, planning, auditing, troubleshooting and reporting internally or externally. Such optimization enables the local environment to be tuned to get the most out of the resources in the local compute environment. However, there are times where more resources are needed than are available in the local environment. This is where the on-demand or hosting center can provide additional resources.
The software has detailed knowledge of jobs in a queue that will consume resources in a compute environment. The software schedules, at a first time, advanced reservations in the compute environment such that the reservation of resources is at a second time, later than the first time. For example, if a queue has ten jobs waiting, job number four can be analyzed with other jobs in the queue and the software establishes at noon an advanced reservation to run job number four at 2 PM. In this manner, when 2 PM arrives, job number four has resources already reserved and have been for two hours), such that job number four will consume, at 2 PM, its reserved resources.
Typically, a hosting center 102 will have the following attributes. It allows an organization to provide resources or services to customers where the resources or services are custom-tailored to the needs of the customer. Supporting true utility computing usually requires creating a hosting center 102 with one or more capabilities as follows: use of advanced reservations; secure remote access; guaranteed resource availability at a fixed time or series of times; integrated auditing, accounting, and billing services; tiered service level (QoS/SLA) based resource access; dynamic compute node provisioning; full environment management over compute, network, storage, and application/service based resources; intelligent workload optimization; high availability; failure recovery; and automated re-allocation.
A management module 108 enables utility computing by allowing compute resources to be reserved, allocated, and dynamically provisioned to meet the needs of internal or external workload. The management module reserves at a first time specific resources in the environment (local or on-demand) for each job in an access control list. The jobs consume the reserved resources at a second time which is later than the first time. For example, a management module may establish at 1 PM (a first time), an advanced reservation for resources at 4 PM (a second time which is later than a first time). This yields reserved resources (in the local or on-demand environment) which will be consumed by workload at the second time, i.e., workload will flow to the reserved resources for use at the appointed time and consume the resources then. The module 108, 122 knows how the compute environment will be used in the future because each job in a queue has its own reservation of resources and, therefore, the system knows what the workload use will be at any given time. This is distinguishable from a load balancing approach which does not reserve resources for future use. Thus, at peak workload times or based on some other criteria, the local compute environment does not need to be built out with peak usage in mind. As periodic peak resources are required, triggers can cause overflow to the on-demand environment and thus save money for the customer. The module 108 is able to respond to either manual or automatically generated requests and can guarantee resource availability subject to existing service level agreement (SLA) or quality of service (QOS) based arrangements. As an example,
Other software is shown by way of example in a distributed resource manager such as Torque 128 and various nodes 130, 132 and 134. The management modules (both master and/or slave) can interact and operate with any resource manager, such as Torque, LSF, SGE, PBS and LoadLeveler and are agnostic in this regard. Those of skill in the art will recognize these different distributed resource manager software packages.
A hosting master or hosting management module 106 can also be an instance of a Moab™ software product with hosting center capabilities to enable an organization to dynamically control network, advanced reservation, compute, application, and storage resources and to dynamically reserve and provision operating systems, security, credentials, and other aspects of a complete end-to-end compute environment. Module 106 is responsible for knowing all the policies, guarantees, promises and also for managing the provisioning of resources within the utility computing space 102. In one sense, module 106 can be referred to as the “master” module in that it couples and needs to know all of the information associated with both the utility environment and the local environment. However, in another sense it can be referred to as the slave module or provisioning broker wherein it takes instructions from the customer management module 108 for provisioning resources and builds whatever environment is requested in the on-demand center 102. A slave module would have none of its own local policies but rather follows all requests from another management module. For example, when module 106 is the slave module, then a master module 108 would submit automated or manual (via an administrator or user) requests that the slave module 106 simply follows to manage the reservations of and build out of the requested environment. Thus, for both IT and end users, a single easily usable interface can increase efficiency; reduce costs, including management costs; and improve investments in the local customer environment. The interface to the local environment, which also has the access to the on-demand environment, can be a web-interface or an access portal. Restrictions of feasibility only can exist. The customer module 108 would have rights and ownership of all resources. The reserved and allocated resources would not be shared, but would be dedicated to the requester. As the slave module 106 follows all directions from the master module 108, any policy restrictions will preferably occur on the master module 108 in the local environment.
The modules also provide data management services that simplify adding resources from across a local environment. For example, if the local environment includes a wide area network, the management module 108 provides a security model that ensures, when the environment dictates, that administrators can rely on the system even when untrusted resources at the certain level have been added to the local environment or the on-demand environment. In addition, the management modules comply with n-tier web services based architectures and therefore, scalability and reporting are inherent parts of the system. A system operating according to the principles set forth herein also has the ability to track, record and archive information about jobs or other processes that have been run on the system.
A hosting center 102 provides scheduled dedicated resources to customers for various purposes and typically has a number of key attributes: secure remote access, guaranteed resource availability at a fixed time or series of times, tightly integrated auditing/accounting services, varying quality of service levels providing privileged access to a set of users, node image management allowing the hosting center to restore an exact customer-specific image before enabling access. Resources available to a module 106, which can also be referred to as a provider resource broker, will have both rigid (architecture, RAM, local disk space, etc.) and flexible (OS, queues, installed applications etc.) attributes. The provider or on-demand resource broker 106 can typically provision (dynamically modify) flexible attributes, but not rigid attributes. The provider broker 106 can possess multiple resources, each with different types with rigid attributes (i.e., single processor and dual processor nodes, Intel nodes, AMD nodes, nodes with 512 MB RAM, nodes with 1 GB RAM, etc).
This combination of attributes presents unique constraints on a management system. Described herein are how the management modules 108 and 106 are able to effectively manage, modify, reserve, and provision resources in this environment and provide full array of services on top of these resources. The management modules' 108, 120 advanced reservation and policy management tools provide support for the establishment of extensive service level agreements, automated billing, and instant chart and report creation. By knowing the list of jobs to be run in the local/on-demand compute environments, the management modules can make, at a first time, reservations for future consumption of resources at a second time, which is later than the first time, by the jobs and more intelligently know what the resource usage will be in the future, thus allowing the system to know, for example, that the local environment will need on-demand resources in an hour. Thus, as shown in
Utility-based computing technology allows a hosting center 102 to quickly harness existing compute resources, dynamically co-allocate the resources, and automatically provision them into a seamless virtual cluster. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/276,852 incorporated herein by reference above, discloses a virtual private cluster (VPC). The process involves aggregating compute resources and establishing partitions of the aggregated compute resources. Then the system presents only the partitioned resources accessible by an organization to use within the organization. Thus, in the on-demand center 102, as resources are needed, the control and establishment of an environment for workload from a local environment can occur via the means of creating, via reservations, a virtual private cluster for the local user workload within reserved, provisioned resources in the on-demand compute environment 120. Note that further details regarding the creation and use of VPCs are found in the '852 application. In each case discussed herein where on-demand compute resources are identified, reserved, provisioned and consumed by local environment workload, the means by which this is accomplished can be through the creation of a VPC within the on-demand center.
Also shown in
The modules 108, 106, 120 address these and similar issues through the use of the identity manager 112. The identity manager 112 allows the module to exchange information with an external identity management service. As with the module's resource manager interfaces, this service can be a full commercial package designed for this purpose, or something far simpler by which the module obtains the needed information for a web service, text file, or database.
Next, attention is turned to the node provisioner 118. As an example of its operation, the node provisioner 118 can enable the allocation of resources in the hosting center 102 for workload from a local compute environment 104. As mentioned above, one aspect of this process can be to create a VPC within the hosting center as directed by the module 108. Reservations of resources in the hosting center are used to create the VPC, or to reserve resources in the on-demand compute environment that can be provisioned on the VPC. The customer management module 108 will communicate with the hosting management module 106 to begin the provisioning process. In one aspect, the provisioning module 118 can generate another instance of necessary management software 120 and 122 which will be created in the hosting center environment as well as compute nodes 124 and 126 to be consumed by a submitted job at the time of their reservation. The new management module 120 is created on the fly, can be associated with a specific request and will preferably be operative on a dedicated node. If the new management module 120 is associated with a specific request or job, as the job consumes the reserved resources associated with the provisioned compute nodes 124, 126, and the job completes, then the system can remove the management module 120 since it was only created for the specific request. The new management module 120 can connect to other modules such as module 108. The module 120 does not necessarily have to be created but can be generated on the fly as necessary to assist in communication, reservations, and provisioning and use of the resources in the utility environment 102. For example, the module 106 can go ahead and reserve and allocate nodes within the utility computing environment 102 and connect these nodes directly to module 108 but in that case you can lose some batch ability as a tradeoff. The hosting master 128 having the management module 106, identity manager 112 and node provisioner 118 preferably is co-located with the utility computing environment but can be distributed. The management module 108 on the local environment 104 can then communicate directly with the created management module 120 in the hosting center 102 to manage the transfer of workload and consumption of on-demand center resources, Created management module 120 can be part of a VPC.
With reference to
Although the exemplary environment described herein employs the hard disk, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, memory cartridges, random access memories (RAMS) read only memory (ROM), and the like, can also be used in the exemplary operating environment. The system above provides an example server or computing device that can be utilized and networked with a cluster, clusters or a grid to manage the resources according to the principles set forth herein. It is also recognized that other hardware configurations can be developed in the future upon which the method can be operable.
As mentioned a concept useful but not necessary for enabling the technology include an easy-to-use capacity on-demand feature and dynamic VPCs. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/276,852 flied 16 Mar. 2006 referenced above provide further details regarding VPCs and the capability is enabled in the incorporated source code in the parent provisional application, Regarding the easy-to-use capacity on demand,
As can be seen in interface 300, there are other parameters shown such as maximum capacity and service level limits, and wall time limits and quality of service levels. Thus a user can provide for a customized approach to utilizing the on-demand center. The user can enable service level enforcement policies and apply the policies to various gradations of the workload, such as to all workload with excessive wait times, only high priority workload with excessive wait time and/or only workload with excessive wait time that has the outsource flag applied. Other gradations are also contemplated, such as enabling the user to further define “excessive” wait time or how high the high priority workload is.
The dynamic VPC enables for the packaging, securing, optimizing and guaranteeing of the right resource delivery in cluster, grid and hosting center environments. The VPC is used to virtually partition multiple types of resources (such as different hardware resources, software licenses, VLANs, storage, etc.) into units that can be treated as independent clusters. These independent virtual clusters can have their own policy controls, security, resource guarantees, optimization, billing and reporting. The VPC uses the management software's scheduling, reservation and policy controls to automatically change the virtual boundaries to match the required resources to the associated workload. For example, if a client first needed resources from a traditional Linux compute farm, but then over time had workload that increasingly needed SMP resources, the dynamic VPC could optimally adapt the correct resources to match the workload requirements. The dynamic VPC provides flexibility to manage and modify the resources in the on-demand center. Otherwise, the hosting services are too rigid, causing clients to go through the tasks of redefining and renegotiating which resources are provided or causing them to pay for resources that didn't match their changing needs.
Other differentiators enabled in the management software include detailed knowledge and fine grained control of workload which includes workload allocation (CPU vs. data intensive workload), optimized data staging, resource affinity, highly optimized resource co-allocation, provisioning integration, and integration security management. Service level enforcement controls relate to guaranteed response times and guaranteed uptime. There are broad management capabilities such as multi-resource manager support and flexibility in management modules such as single system images. More details about these features follow.
Regarding workload allocation, one of the intelligence capabilities enabled by the detailed knowledge and control over workload is its ability to differentiate between CPU-intensive and data-intensive workload. When the software schedules, via advanced reservations, HPC workload for a hosting center, it can automatically send the more CPU-intensive workload to the hosting site, while focusing the data-intensive workload locally. This means that jobs with large data files do not need to tie up networks, and the approach reduces the total response time of the clients' workload. Clients are more satisfied because their work gets done sooner and the hosting center is more satisfied because it can process workload that is most profitable to the “CPU Hour” billing model.
Optimized data staging is another aspect of the software's detailed knowledge and control of workload. This technology increases the performance of data-intensive workload by breaking a job's reservation into the two, three (or more) elements of pre-staging data, processing workload and staging results back. Each job in a queue can have its own reservation of resources such that the software has detailed knowledge of resources that will be consumed in the future for jobs in the queue. Other scheduling technologies reserve the processor and other resources on a node for the duration of all three, leaving the CPU idle during data staging and the I/O capacity virtually idle during the processing period. The management software of the present disclosure has an information querying service that analyzes both file and network information services and then intelligently schedules all two or three processes in an optimized manner. The I/O capacity is scheduled, via advanced reservations, to avoid conflict between data staging periods, and CPU scheduling is optimized to allow for the most complete use of the underlying processor. Once again, this assists the end client in getting more accomplished in a shorter period of time, and optimizes the hosting providers' resources to avoid idle CPU time.
Regarding resource affinity, the management module 108, 120 leverages its detailed knowledge of workload requests and reservations in the compute environment, by applying jobs to the resource type able to provide the fastest response time. For example, if a job is likely to run faster on AIX over Linux, on an SMP system as opposed to a traditional CPU farm, or performs better on a specific network type, such affinities can be configured manually or set automatically to occur so that workload is optimized The management modules 108, 120 also have the capability to track these variables and apply higher charge rates to those using the more costly systems.
The management modules 108, 120 associate workload requests with service level enforcement controls, such as guaranteeing response time and guaranteeing uptime. This is accomplished through intelligent use of advanced reservations. It is noted that on-demand high performance computing centers can therefore manage service level enforcement, or else their clientele will never repeat business. An application of this capability includes setting rules that automatically push all of a site's backlogged workload over to a hosting center. This capability can be referred to as workload surge protection. The advanced scheduling algorithms and policy management capabilities can be set to meet these needs by reserving resources in the hosting center for the backlogged workload overflow. Below are sample industries that have specific needs for such guarantees: Homeland Security (guarantee response times, as well as guarantee uptime, workload surge protection); and National Institute of Health (desires the software guarantee resources in the event of a national crisis, up to the point of preempting all other jobs across the entire grid). This feature, called “Run Now,” provides the required guaranteed immediate response time. To do so it performs a host of complex queries to provide the response time at the lowest possible cost to participating sites. The software can achieve this by running through more than 8 levels (any number can apply) of increasingly aggressive policies to provide the resources starting with the least impacting levels and fully exhausting its options prior to increasing to the next more aggressive level. Similarly, the software's intelligence allows hosting sites to provide promised SLA levels that keep the client fully satisfied, while providing the highest possible return to the hosting provider; multi-media-film, gaming, simulation and other rendering intense areas (guarantee response time); oil & gas (guarantee response time, workload surge protection); Aerospace (guarantee response time); Financial (guarantee uptime and guarantee response time, workload surge protection); Manufacturers-Pharmaceuticals, Auto, Chip and other “First to Market” intense industries (guarantee response time, workload surge protection). As can be seen, the software provides features applicable in many markets.
Another feature relates to the software's architecture which allows for simultaneous monitoring, reserving, scheduling, and managing of multiple resource types, and can be deployed across different environments or used as a central point of connection for distinct environments. Regarding the broad compatibility, the software's server-side elements work on at least Linux, Unix and Mac OS X environments (it can manage Linux, Unix, Mac OS X, Windows and mainframe environments depending on what the local resource manager supports). The client-side software works on Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and Windows environments as well as other environments.
Multi-resource manager support enables the software to work across virtually all mainstream compute resource managers. These compute resource managers include, but are not limited to, LoadLeveler, LSF, PBSPro, TORQUE, OpenPBS and others. Not only does this increase the number of environments in which it can be used to provide capacity on demand capabilities, but it leaves the customer with a larger set of options going forward because it doesn't lock them into one particular vendor's solution. Also, with multi-resource manager support, the software can interoperate with multiple compute resource managers at the same time, thus allowing grid capabilities even in mixed environments.
Beyond the traditional compute resource manager that manages job submission to compute nodes, the software can integrate with storage resource managers, network resource managers, software license resource managers, etc. It uses this multiplicity of information sources to make its policy decisions more effective. The software can also connect up to hardware monitors such as Ganglia, custom scripts, executables and databases to get additional information that most local compute resource managers would not have available. This additional information can be queried and evaluated by the software or an administrator to be applied to workload reservation and placement decisions and other system policies.
Regarding the flexibility of management models, the software enables providing the capacity on demand capability any supported cluster environment or grid environment. The software can be configured to enable multiple grid types and management models. The two preferable grid types enabled by the software are local area grids and wide area grids, although others are also enabled.
Grids are inherently political in nature and flexibility to manage what information is shared and what information is not is central to establishing such grids. Using the software, administrators can create policies to manage information sharing in difficult political environments.
Organizations can control information sharing and privacy in at least three different ways: (1) Allow all resource (e.g. nodes, storage, etc.), workload (e.g. jobs; reservations, etc.) and policy (e.g. sharing and prioritization rules) information to be shared to provide full accounting and reporting; (2) Allow other sites to only see resource, workload and policy information that pertains to them so that full resource details can be kept private and more simplified; (3) Allow other sites to only see a single resource block, revealing nothing more than the aggregate volume of resources available for reservation and use by to the other site. This allows resources, workload and policy information to be kept private, while still allowing shared relationships to take place. For example, a site that has 1,024 processors can publicly display only 64 processors to other sites on the grid.
The above mentioned grid types and management scenarios can be combined together with the information sharing and privacy rules to create custom relationships that match the needs of the underlying organizations.
The software is able to facilitate virtually any grid relationship such as by, joining local area grids into wide area grids; joining wide area grids to other wide area grids (whether they be managed centrally, locally “peer to peer,” or mixed); sharing resources in one direction (e.g. for use with hosting centers or lease out one's own resources); enabling multiple levels of grid relationships (e.g. conglomerates within conglomerates). As can be appreciated, the local environment can be one of many configurations as discussed by way of example above.
Various aspects of the disclosure with respect to accessing an on-demand center from a local environment will be discussed next. One aspect relates to enabling the automatic detection of an event such as resource thresholds or service thresholds within the compute environment 104. For example, if a threshold of 95% of processor consumption is met because 951 processors out of the 1000 processors in the environment are being utilized, then the WM 108 can automatically establish a connection with the on-demand environment 102. A service threshold, a policy-based threshold, a hardware-based threshold or any other type of threshold can trigger the communication to the hosting center 102. Other events as well can trigger communication with the hosting center such as a workload backlog having a certain configuration. The WM 108 then can communicate with WM 106 to reserve resources, and then provision or customize the reserved on-demand resources 102. The creation of a VPC within the on-demand center can occur. The two environments exchange the necessary information to create reservations of resources, provision the resources, manage licensing, and so forth, necessary to enable the automatic transfer of jobs or other workload from the local environment 104 to the on-demand environment 102. Nothing about a user job 110 submitted to a WM 108 changes. The physical environment of the local compute environment 104 can also be replicated in the on-demand center. The on-demand environment 102 then instantly begins running the job without any change in the job or perhaps even any knowledge of the submitter.
In another aspect, predicted events can also be triggers. For example, a predicted failure of nodes within the local environment, predicted events internal or external to the environment, or predicted meeting of thresholds can trigger communication with the on-demand center. These are all configurable and can either automatically trigger the migration of jobs or workload or can trigger a notification to the user or administrator to make a decision regarding whether to migrate workload or access the on-demand center.
Regarding the analysis and transfer of backlog workload, the method embodiment provides for determining whether a backlog workload condition exists in the local compute environment. If the backlog workload condition exists, then the system analyzes the backlog workload, communicates information associated with the analysis to the on-demand compute environment, establishes a reservation of resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, provisions the reserved resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield provisional resources in the on-demand compute environment according to the analyzed backlog workload and transfers the backlog workload to the provisioned resources. It is preferable that the provisioning the on-demand compute environment further includes establishing a reservation of resources to create a virtual private cluster within the on-demand compute environment. Analyzing the workload can include determining at least one resource type associated with the backlog workload for provisioning in the on-demand compute environment.
In another aspect, analyzing the backlog workload, communicating the information associated with analysis to the on-demand compute environment, reserving resources at a future time in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, provisioning the reserved resources in the on-demand compute environment according to the analyzed backlog workload and transferring the backlog workload to the provisioned resources in the on-demand compute environment occurs in response to a one-click operation from an administrator. However, the process of reserving, provisioning and transferring backlog workload to the on-demand center can begin based on any number of events. For example, a user can interact with a user interface to initiate the transfer of backlog workload. An internal event such as a threshold, for example, a wait time reaching a maximum, can be an event that could trigger the analysis and transfer. An external event can also trigger the transfer of backlog workload such as a terrorist attack, weather conditions, power outages, etc.
There are several aspects to this disclosure that are shown in the attached source code. One is the ability to exchange information. For example, for the automatic transfer of workload to the on-demand center, the system will import remote classes, configuration policy information, physical hardware information, operating systems and other information from environment 102 the WM 108 to the slave WM 106 for use by the on-demand environment 102. Information regarding the on-demand compute environment, resources, policies and so forth are also communicated from the slave WM 106 to the local WM 108.
A method embodiment can therefore provide a method of managing resources between a local compute environment and an on-demand compute environment. An exemplary method includes detecting an event associated with a local compute environment. As mentioned the event can be any type of trigger or threshold. The software then identifies information about the local compute environment, establishes communication with an on-demand compute environment and transmits the information about the local environment to the on-demand compute environment. With that information, the software establishes at a first time an advanced reservation of resources in the on-demand compute environment to yield reserved resources, and then provisions the reserved resources within the on-demand compute environment to duplicate or substantially duplicate the local compute environment and transfers workload from the local-environment to the provisional resources in the on-demand compute environment. The workload consumes the provisional resources at a second time which is later than the first time. In another aspect, the provisioning does not necessarily duplicate the local environment but specially provisions the on-demand environment for the workload to be migrated to the on-demand center. As an example, the information communicated about the local environment can relate to at least hardware and/or an operating system. But the workload to be transferred to the on-demand center may have an affinity to hardware and/or an operating system that differs from that in the local compute environment. Therefore, the software can request different hardware and/or software in the on-demand center from the configuration of the local compute environment. Establishing communication with the on-demand compute environment and transmitting the information about the local environment to the on-demand compute environment can be performed automatically or manually via a user interface. Using such an interface can enable the user to provide a one-click or one action request to establish the communication and migrate workload to the on-demand center.
In some cases, as the software seeks to reserve and provision resources, a particular resource cannot be duplicated in the on-demand compute environment. In this scenario, the software will identify and select a substitute resource. This process of identifying and selecting a substitute resource can be accomplished either at the on-demand environment or via negotiation between a slave workload manager 120 at the on-demand environment and a master workload manager 108 on the local compute environment. The method further can include identifying a type of workload to transfer to the on-demand environment 102, and wherein transferring workload from the local-environment 104 to the on-demand compute environment 102 further includes only transferring the identified type of workload to the on-demand center. In another aspect, the transferring of the identified type of workload to the on-demand center 102 is based upon different hardware and/or software capabilities between the on-demand environment and the local compute environment.
Another aspect of the disclosure is the ability to automate data management between two sites. This involves the transparent handling of data management between the on-demand environment 102 and the local environment 104 that is transparent to the user. In other words, it can be accomplished without explicit action or configuration by the user. It can also be unknown to the user. Yet another aspect relates to a simple and easy mechanism to enable on-demand center integration. This aspect of the disclosure involves the ability of the user or an administrator to, in a single action like the click of a button, the touching of a touch sensitive screen, motion detection, or other simple action, command the integration of an on-demand center information and capability into the local WM 108. In this regard, the system will be able to automatically exchange and integrate all the necessary information and resource knowledge in a single click to broaden the set of resources that can be available to users who have access initially only to the local compute environment 104. The information can include the various aspect of available resources at the on-demand center such as time-frame, cost of resources, resource type, etc.
One of the aspects of the integration of an on-demand environment 102 and a local compute environment 104 is that the overall data appears locally. In other words, the WM 108 will have access to the resources and knowledge of the on-demand environment 102 but the view of those resources, with the appropriate adherence to local policy requirements, is handled locally and appears locally to users and administrators of the local environment 104.
Another aspect is enabled with the attached source code is the ability to specify configuration information associated with the local environment 104 and feeding it to the hosting center 102. For example, the interaction between the compute environments supports static reservations. A static reservation is a reservation that a user or an administrator cannot change, remove or destroy. It is a reservation that is associated with the WM 108 itself. A static reservation blocks out time frames when resources are not available for other uses. For example, if, to enable a compute environment to run (consume) resources, a job takes an hour to provision a resource, then the WM 108 can establish a static reservation of resources for the provisioning process. The WM 108 will locally create a static reservation for the provisioning component of running the job. The WM 108 will report on these constraints associated with the created static reservation.
Then, the WM 108 can communicate with the slave WM 106 if on-demand resources are needed to run a job. The WM 108 communicates with the slave WM 106 and identifies what resources are needed (20 processors and 512 MB of memory, for example) and inquires when can those resources be available. Assume that WM 106 responds that the processors and memory will be available in one hour and that the WM 108 can have those resources for 36 hours. The system can establish a normal reservation of the processors and memory in the on-demand center starting in an hour and lasting for 36 hours. Once all the appropriate information has been communicated between the WM 106 and WM 108, then WM 108 creates a static reservation in the on-demand center to block the first part of the resources which requires the one hour of provisioning. The WM 108 can also block out the resources with a static reservation from hour 36 to infinity until the resources go away. Therefore, from zero to one hour is blocked out by a static reservation and from the end of the 36 hours to infinity is blocked out with a static reservation. In this way, the scheduler 108 can optimize the on-demand resources and insure that they are available for local workloads. The communication between the WMs 106 and 108 is performed preferably via tunneling.
Yet another aspect is the ability to have a single agent such as the WM 108 or some other software agent detect a parameter, event or configuration in the local environment 104. The environment in this sense includes both hardware and software and other aspects of the environment. For example, a cluster environment 104 can have, besides the policies and restrictions on users and groups as discussed above, a certain hardware/software configuration such as a certain number of nodes, a certain amount of memory and disk space, operating systems and software loaded onto the nodes and so forth. The agent (which can be WM 108 or some other software module) determines the physical aspects of the compute environment 104 and communicates with the on-demand hosting center to provide an automatic reservation of and provisioning of reserved resources within the center 102 such that the local environment is duplicated. The duplication can match the same hardware/software configuration or can may dynamically or manually substitute alternate components. The communication and transfer of workload to a replicated environment within the hosting center 102 can occur automatically (say at the detection of a threshold value) or at the push of a button from an administrator. Therefore information regarding the local environment is examined and the WM 108 or another software agent transfers that information to the hosting center 102 for replication.
The replication, therefore, involves providing the same or perhaps similar number of nodes, provisioning operating systems, file system architecture and memory and any other hardware or software aspects of the hosting center 102 using WM 106 to replicate the compute environment 104. Those of skill in the art will understand that other elements that can need to be provisioned to duplicate the environment. Where the exact environment cannot be replicated in the hosting center 102, decisions can be made by the WM 106 or via negotiation between WM 106 and WM 108 to determine an alternate provisioning.
In another aspect, a user of the compute environment 104 such as an administrator can configure at the client site 104 a compute environment and when workload is transferred to the hosting center 102, the desired compute environment can be provisioned. In other words, the administrator could configure a better or more suited environment than the compute environment 104 that exists. As an example, a company can want to build a compute environment 104 that will be utilized by processor intensive jobs and memory intensive jobs. It can be cheaper for the administrator of the environment 104 to build an environment that is better suited to the processor intensive jobs. The administrator can configure a processor intensive environment at the local cluster 104 and when a memory intensive job 110 is submitted, the memory intensive environment can be reserved and provisioned in the hosting center 102 to offload that job.
In this regard, the administrator can generate profiles of various configurations for various “one-click” provisioning on the hosting center 102. For example, the administrator can have profiles for compute intensive jobs, memory intensive jobs, types of operating system, types of software, any combination of software and hardware requirements and other types of environments. Those of skill in the art will understand the various types of profiles that can be created. The local cluster 104 has a relationship with the hosting center 102 where the administrator can transfer workload based on one of the one or more created profiles. This can be done automatically if the WM 108 identifies a user job 110 that matches a profile or can be done manually by the administrator via a user interface that can be graphical. The administrator can be able to, in “one click,” select the option to have resources in the on-demand center reserved and provisioned to receive a memory intensive component of the workload to process according to the memory-intensive profile.
The relationship between the hosting center 102 and the local cluster 104 by way of arranging for managing the workload can be established in advance or dynamically. The example above illustrates the scenario where the arrangement is created in advance where profiles exist for selection by a system or an administrator. The dynamic scenario can occur where the local administrator for the environment 104 has a new user with a different desired profile than the profiles already created. The new user wants to utilize the resources 104. Profiles configured for new users or groups can be manually added and/or negotiated between the hosting center 102 and the local duster 104 or can be automatic. There can be provisions made for the automatic identification of a different type of profile and WM 108 (or another module) can communicate with WM 106 (or another module) to arrange for the availability/capability of the on-demand center to handle workload according to the new profile and to arrange cost, etc. If no new profile can be created, then a default or generic profile, or the closest previously existing profile to match the needs of the new user's job can be selected. In this manner, the system can easily and dynamically manage the addition of new users or groups to the local cluster 104.
In this regard, when WM 108 submits a query to the WM 106 stating that it needs a certain set of resources, it passes the profile(s) as well. Receiving resource requirement information may be based on user specification, current or predicted workload. The specification of resources may be one of fully explicit, partially explicit, fully implicit based on workload, and based on virtual private cluster (VPC) package concept where VPC package can include aspects of allocated or provisioning support environment and adjustments to resource request timeframes including pre-allocation, allocation duration, and post-allocation timeframe adjustments. The incorporated application above includes the discussion of virtual private clusters which are completely applicable and integrated into this disclosure and capability with on-demand centers. The reserved resources may be associated with provisioning or customizing the delivered compute environment. A reservation may involve the co-allocation of resources including any combination of compute, network, storage, license, or service resources (i.e., parallel database services, security services, provisioning services) as part of a reservation across multiple different resource types. Also, the co-allocation of resources over disjoint timeframes to improve availability and utilization of resources may be part of a reservation or a modification of resources. Resources may also be reserved with automated failure handling and resource recovery. WM 106 identifies when resources are available in static dimensions (such as identifies that a certain amount of memory, nodes and/or other types of architecture are available). This step will identify whether the requestor obtains the raw resources to meet those needs. Then the WM 106 will manage the customer install and provisioning of the software, operating systems, and so forth according to the received profile. In this manner, the entire specification of needs according to the profile can be met.
Another aspect of the disclosure relates to looking at the workload overflowing to the hosting center. The system can customize the environment for the particular overflow workload. This was referenced above. The agent 108 can examine the workload on the local cluster 104 and determine what part of that workload or if all of that workload, can be transferred to the hosting center 102. The agent identifies whether the local environment is overloaded with work and what type of work is causing the overload. The agent can preemptively identify workload that would overload the local environment or can dynamically identify overload work being processed. For example, if a job 110 is submitted that is both memory intensive and processor intensive, the WM 108 will recognize that and intelligently communicate with the WM 106 to transfer the processor intensive portion of the workload to reserve resources in the hosting center 102. This can be preferable for several reasons. Perhaps it is cheaper to utilize hosting center 102 processing time for processor intensive time. Perhaps the local environment 104 is more suited to the memory intensive component of the workload. Also, perhaps restrictions such as bandwidth, user policies, current reservations in the local 104 or hosting 102 environment and so forth can govern where workload is processed. For example, the decision of where to process workload can be in response to the knowledge that the environment 104 is not as well suited for the processor intensive component of the workload or due to other jobs running or scheduled to run in the environment 104. As mentioned above, the WM 106 manages the proper reservation and provisioning of resources in the hosting center environment for the overflow workload.
Where the agent has identified a certain type of workload that is causing the overload, the system can automatically reserve and provision resources in the hosting center to match the overload workload and then transfer that workload over.
As another example of how this works, a threshold can be met for work being processed on the local cluster 104. The threshold can be met by how much processing power is being used, how much memory is available, whether the user has hit a restriction on permissions, and/or a determination that a quality of service has not been met or any other parameter. Once that threshold is met, either automatically or via an administrator, a button can be pressed and WM 108 analyzes the workload on the environment 104. The WM 108 can identify that there is a backlog and determine that more nodes are needed (or more of any specific type of resource is needed). The WM 108 will communicate with WM 106 to enable, at a first time, the creation of an advanced reservation of resources in the hosting center. The WM 108/106 autoprovisions the reserved resources within the hosting center to meet the needs of the backlogged jobs. The appropriate resources, hardware, software, permissions and policies can be duplicated exactly or in an acceptable fashion to resolve the backlog. Further, the autoprovisioning can be performed with reference to the backlog workload needs rather than the local environment configuration. In this respect, the overflow workload is identified and analyzed and the reservation and provisioning in the hosting center is matched to the workload itself (in contrast to matching the local environment) for processing when the backlog workload is transferred. The reservation of the resources is for a second time which is later than the first time. Thus, the workload is transferred such that the reservation insures that the reserved resources are available for the workload. Therefore, the reservation and provisioning can be based on a specific resource type that will resolve most efficiently the backlog workload.
One aspect of this disclosure relates to the application of the concepts above to provide a website server with backup computing power via a hosting center 102. This aspect of the disclosure is shown by the system 800 in
In this regard, the WM 804 would monitor the web traffic 306 and resources on the web server 802. The web server 802 of course can be a cluster or group of servers configured to provide a website. The WM 804 is configured to treat web traffic 806 and everything associated with how the web traffic consumes resources within the web server 802 as a job or a group of jobs. An event such as a threshold is detected by WM 804. If the threshold is passed or the event occurs, the WM 804 communicates with the WM 106 of the hosting center 102, the WM 106 establishes an advanced reservation of resources to yield reserved resources and then autoprovisions the reserved resources and enables web traffic to flow to the autoprovisioned resources in the hosting center 102 where the requests would be received and webpages and web content is returned. The provisioning of resources can also be performed manually for example in preparation for increased web traffic for some reason. As an example, if an insurance company knows that a hurricane is coming it can provide for and prepare for increased website traffic.
The management of web traffic 806 to the webserver 802 and to the hosting center 102 can also be coordinated such that a portion of the requests go directly to the hosting center 102 or are routed from the web server 802 to the hosting center 102 for response. For example, once the provisioning in the reserved resources in the hosting center 102 is complete, an agent (which can communicate with the WM 804) can then intercept web traffic directed to the web server 302 and direct it to the hosting center 102, which can deliver website content directly to the client browser (not shown) requesting the information. Those of skill in the art will recognize that there are several ways in which web traffic 806 can be intercepted and routed to the provisioned reserved resources at the hosting center 102 such that it is transparent to the client web browser that a hosting center 102 rather than the web server 802 is servicing the web session.
The identification of the threshold can be based on an increase of current traffic or can be identified from another source. For example, if the New York Times or some other major media outlet mentions a website, that event can cause a predictable increase in traffic. In this regard, one aspect of the disclosure is a monitoring of possible triggers to increased web activity. The monitoring can be via a Google (or any type of) automatic search of the website name in outlets like www.nytimes.com, www.washingtonpost.com or www.powerlineblog.com, if the website is identified in these outlets, then an administrator or automatically the provisioning of reserved resources can occur at a predictable time of when the increased traffic would occur.
Another aspect of the disclosure is illustrated in an example. In one case, a small website (we can call it www.smallsite.com) was referenced in the Google™ search engine page. Because of the large number of users of Google, www.smallsite.com went down. To prevent this from happening, when a high traffic source such as www.google.com or www.nytimes.com links to or references a small or low traffic website, then an automatic reservation and provisioning of reserved resources can be performed. For example, if the link from Google to www.smallsite.com were created, and the system (either Google or a special feature available with any website) identified that such a link was established which is likely to cause an increased amount of traffic, then the necessary reservation, provisioning, mirroring of content, and so forth, could occur between the web server 802 and the hosting center 102 and the necessary DNS modifications to enable the off-loading of some or all of the web traffic to the hosting center.
If some of the traffic is routed to the hosting center 102, then provisions are made to send that traffic either directly or indirectly to the reserved, provisioned resources in the hosting center 102. In one aspect, the data is mirrored to the hosting center 102 and the hosting center can exclusively handle the traffic until a certain threshold is met and the web traffic can be automatically transferred back to the web server 802.
The off-loading of web traffic can be featured as an add-on charge available to websites as well as charges or fees for the services that can be used to identify when traffic can increase. External forces (such as mentioning a website on the news) can trigger the increase as well as internal forces. For example, if a special offer is posted on a website for a reduced price for a product, then the website can expect increased traffic. In this regard, there can be a “one-click” option to identify a time period (I day offloading) and a starting time (2 hours after the offer is posted) for the offloading to occur.
As can be appreciated, the principles of the present disclosure enable the average user “surfing” the web to enjoy access and experience websites that can otherwise be unavailable due to large internee traffic. The benefit certainly inures to website owners and operators who will avoid unwanted down time and the negative impact that can have on their business.
While the claims below are method claims, it is understood that the steps can be practiced by compute modules in a system embodiment of the disclosure as well as being related to instructions for controlling a compute device stored on a computer-readable medium. The disclosure can also include a local compute environment 104 and/or an on-demand center 102 configured to operated as described above. A webserver(s) 802 and/or the on-demand center 102 with any other network nodes configured to enable the offloading of web traffic 806 can also be an embodiment of the disclosure. This can also involve an additional software alteration on a web browser to enable the offloading of web traffic. Further, any hardware system or network can also be embodied in the disclosure.
As mentioned above, the present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/276,856, which was incorporated herein by reference. The following paragraphs, modified for formatting, are from that application.
An on-demand compute environment comprises a plurality of nodes within an on-demand compute environment available for provisioning and a slave management module operating on a dedicated node within the on-demand compute environment, wherein upon instructions from a master management module at a local compute environment, the slave management module modifies at least one node of the plurality of nodes.
The present invention relates to a resource management system and more specifically to a system and method of providing access to on-demand compute resources.
Managers of Clusters desire maximum return on investment often meaning high system utilization and the ability to deliver various qualities of service to various users and groups. A cluster is typically defined as a parallel computer that is constructed of commodity components and runs as its system software commodity software. A cluster contains nodes each containing one or more processors, memory that is shared by all of the processors in the respective node and additional peripheral devices such as storage disks that are connected by a network that allows data to move between nodes. A cluster is one example of a compute environment. Other examples include a grid, which is loosely defined as a group of clusters, and a computer farm which is another organization of computer for processing.
Often a set of resources organized in a cluster or a grid may have jobs to be submitted to the resources that require more capability than the set of resource has available. In this regard, there is a need in the art for being able to easily, efficiently and on-demand be able to utilize new resources or different resources to handle a job. The concept of “on-demand” compute resources has been developing in the high performance computing community recently. An on-demand computing environment enables companies to procure compute power for average demand and then contract remote processing power to help in peak loads or to offload all their compute needs to a remote facility. Several reference books having background material related to on-demand computing or utility computing include Mike Ault, Madhu lumina, Oracle 10 g Grid &Real Application Clusters, Rampant TechPress, 2004 and Guy Bunker, Darren Thomson, Delivering Utility Computing Business-driven IT Optimization, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2006.
In Bunker and Thompson, section 3.3 on page 32 is entitled “Connectivity: The Great Enabler” wherein they discuss how the interconnecting of computers will dramatically increase their usefulness. This disclosure addresses that issue. There exists in the art a need for improved solutions to enable communication and connectivity with an on-demand high performance computing center.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The features and advantages of the invention may be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth herein.
Various embodiments of the invention include, but are not limited to, methods, systems, computing devices, clusters, grids and computer-readable media that perform the processes and steps described herein.
An on-demand compute environment comprises a plurality of nodes within an on-demand compute environment available for provisioning and a slave management module operating on a dedicated node within the on-demand compute environment, wherein upon instructions from a master management module at a local compute environment, the slave management module modifies at least one node of the plurality of nodes. Methods and computer readable media are also disclosed for managing an on-demand compute environment.
A benefit of the approaches disclosed herein is a reduction in unnecessary costs of building infrastructure to accommodate peak demand. Thus, customers only pay for the extra processing power they need only during those times when they need it.
Various embodiments are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This disclosure relates to the access and management of on-demand or utility computing resources at a hosting center.
Products such as Moab provide an essential service for optimization of a local compute environment. It provides an analysis into how & when local resources, such as software and hardware devices, are being used for the purposes of charge-back, planning, auditing, troubleshooting and reporting internally or externally. Such optimization enables the local environment to be tuned to get the most out of the resources in the local compute environment. However, there are times where more resources are needed.
Typically a hosting center 102 will have the following attributes. It allows an organization to provide resources or services to customers where the resources or services are custom-tailored to the needs of the customer. Supporting true utility computing usually requires creating a hosting center 102 with one or more capabilities as follows: secure remote access, guaranteed resource availability at a fixed time or series of times, integrated auditing/accounting/billing services, tiered service level (QoS/SLA) based resource access, dynamic compute node provisioning, full environment management over compute, network, storage, and application/service based resources, intelligent workload optimization, high availability, failure recovery, and automated re-allocation.
A management module 108 such as, by way of example, Moab™ (which may also refer to any Moab product such as the Moab Workload Manager®, Moab Grid Monitor®, etc. from Cluster Resources, Inc.) enables utility computing by allowing compute resources to be reserved, allocated, and dynamically provisioned to meet the needs of internal or external workload. Thus, at peak workload times, the local compute environment does not need to be built out with peak usage in mind. As periodic peak resources are required, triggers can cause overflow to the on-demand environment and thus save money for the customer. The module 108 is able to respond to either manual or automatically generated requests and can guarantee resource availability subject to existing service level agreement (SLA) or quality of service (QOS) based arrangements. As an example,
Other software is shown by way of example in a distributed resource manager such as Torque 128 and various nodes 130, 132 and 134. The management modules (both master and/or slave) may interact and operate with any resource manager, such as Torque, LSF, SGE, PBS and LoadLeveler and are agnostic in this regard. Those of skill in the art will recognize these different distributed resource manager software packages.
A hosting master or hosting management module 106 may also be an instance of a Moab software product with hosting center capabilities to enable an organization to dynamically control network, compute, application, and storage resources and to dynamically provision operating systems, security, credentials, and other aspects of a complete end-to-end compute environments. Module 106 is responsible for knowing all the policies, guarantees, promises and also for managing the provisioning of resources within the utility computing space 102. In one sense, module 106 may be referred to as the “master” module in that it couples and needs to know all of the information associated with both the utility environment and the local environment. However, in another sense it may be referred to as the slave module or provisioning broker wherein it takes instructions from the customer management module 108 for provisioning resources and builds whatever environment is requested in the on-demand center 102. A slave module would have none of its own local policies but rather follows all requests from another management module. For example, when module 106 is the slave module, then a master module 108 would submit automated or manual (via an administrator) requests that the slave module 106 simply follows to manage the build out of the requested environment. Thus, for both IT and end users, a single easily usable interface can increase efficiency, reduce costs including management costs and improve investments in the local customer environment. The interface to the local environment which also has the access to the on-demand environment may be a web-interface or access portal as well. Restrictions of feasibility only may exist. The customer module 108 would have rights and ownership of all resources. The allocated resources would not be shared but be dedicated to the requester. As the slave module 106 follows all directions from the master module 108, any policy restrictions will preferably occur on the master module 108 in the local environment.
The modules also provide data management services that simplify adding resources from across a local environment. For example, if the local environment comprises a wide area network, the management module 108 provides a security model that ensures, when the environment dictates, that administrators can rely on the system even when untrusted resources at the certain level have been added to the local environment or the on-demand environment. In addition, the management modules comply with n-tier web services based architectures and therefore scalability and reporting are inherent parts of the system. A system operating according to the principles set forth herein also has the ability to track, record and archive information about jobs or other processes that have been run on the system.
A hosting center 102 provides scheduled dedicated resources to customers for various purposes and typically has a number of key attributes: secure remote access, guaranteed resource availability at a fixed time or series of times, tightly integrated auditing/accounting services, varying quality of service levels providing privileged access to a set of users, node image management allowing the hosting center to restore an exact customer-specific image before enabling access. Resources available to a module 106, which may also be referred to as a provider resource broker, will have both rigid (architecture, RAM, local disk space, etc.) and flexible (OS, queues, installed applications etc.) attributes. The provider or on-demand resource broker 106 can typically provision (dynamically modify) flexible attributes but not rigid attributes. The provider broker 106 may possess multiple resources each with different types with rigid attributes (i.e., single processor and dual processor nodes, Intel nodes, AMD nodes, nodes with 512 MB RAM, nodes with 1 GB RAM, etc).
This combination of attributes presents unique constraints on a management system. We describe herein how the management modules 108 and 106 are able to effectively manage, modify and provision resources in this environment and provide full array of services on top of these resources.
Utility-based computing technology allows a hosting center 102 to quickly harness existing compute resources, dynamically co-allocate the resources, and automatically provision them into a seamless virtual cluster. The management modules' advanced reservation and policy management tools provide support for the establishment of extensive service level agreements, automated billing, and instant chart and report creation.
Also shown in
The modules address these and similar issues through the use of the identity manager 112. The identity manager 112 allows the module to exchange information with an external identity management service. As with the module's resource manager interfaces, this service can be a full commercial package designed for this purpose, or something far simpler by which the module obtains the needed information for a web service, text file, or database.
Next attention is turned to the node provisioner 118 and as an example of its operation, the node provisioner 118 can enable the allocation of resources in the hosting center 102 for workload from a local compute environment 104. The customer management module 108 will communicate with the hosting management module 106 to begin the provisioning process. In one aspect, the provisioning module 118 may generate another instance of necessary management software 120 and 122 which will be created in the hosting center environment as well as compute nodes 124 and 126 to be consumed by a submitted job. The new management module 120 is created on the fly, may be associated with a specific request and will preferably be operative on a dedicated node. If the new management module 120 is associated with a specific request or job, as the job consumes the resources associated with the provisioned compute nodes 124, 126, and the job becomes complete, then the system would remove the management module 120 since it was only created for the specific request. The new management module 120 may connect to other modules such as module 108. The module 120 does not necessarily have to be created but may be generated on the fly as necessary to assist in communication and provisioning and use of the resources in the utility environment 102. For example, the module 106 may go ahead and allocate nodes within the utility computing environment 102 and connect these nodes directly to module 108 but in that case you may lose some batch ability as a tradeoff. The hosting master 128 having the management module 106, identity manager 112 and node provisioner 118 preferably is co-located with the utility computing environment but may be distributed. The management module on the local environment 108 may then communicate directly with the created management module 120 in the hosting center to manage the transfer of workload and consumption of on-demand center resources.
There are two supported primary usage models, a manual and an automatic model. In manual mode, utilizing the hosted resources can be as easy as going to a web site, specifying what is needed, selecting one of the available options, and logging in when the virtual cluster is activated. In automatic mode, it is even simpler. To utilize hosted resources, the user simply submits jobs to the local cluster. When the local duster can no longer provide an adequate level of service, it automatically contacts the utility hosting center, allocates additional nodes, and runs the jobs. The end user is never aware that the hosting center even exists. He merely notices that the cluster is now bigger and that his jobs are being run more quickly.
When a request for additional resources is made from the local environment, either automatically or manually, a client module or client resource broker (which may be, for example, an instance of a management module 108 or 120) will contact, the provider resource broker 106 to request resources. It will send information regarding rigid attributes of needed resources as well as quantity or resources needed, request duration, and request timeframe (i.e., start time, feasible times of day, etc.) It will also send flexible attributes which must be provisioned on the nodes 124, 126. Both flexible and rigid resource attributes can come from explicit workload-specified requirement or from implicit requirements associated with the local or default compute resources. The provider resource broker 106 must indicate if it is possible to locate requested resources within the specified timeframe for sufficient duration and of the sufficient quantity. This task includes matching rigid resource attributes and identifying one or more provisioning steps required to put in place all flexible attributes.
When provider resources are identified and selected, the client resource broker 108 or 120 is responsible for seamlessly integrating these resources in with other local resources. This includes reporting resource quantity, state, configuration and load. This further includes automatically enabling a trusted connection to the allocated resources which can perform last mile customization, data staging, and job staging. Commands are provided to create this connection to the provider resource broker 106, query available resources, allocate new resources, expand existing allocations, reduce existing allocations, and release all allocated resources.
In most cases, the end goal of a hosting center 102 is to make available to a customer, a complete, secure, packaged environment which allows them to accomplish one or more specific tasks. This packaged environment may be called a virtual cluster and may consist of the compute, network, data, software, and other resources required by the customer. For successful operation, these resources must be brought together and provisioned or configured so as to provide a seamless environment which allows the customers to quickly and easily accomplish their desired tasks.
Another aspect of the invention is the cluster interface. The desired operational model for many environments is providing the customer with a fully automated self-service web interface. Once a customer has registered with the host company, access to a hosting center portal is enabled. Through this interface, customers describe their workload requirements, time constraints, and other key pieces of information. The interface communicates with the backend services to determine when, where, and how the needed virtual cluster can be created and reports back a number of options to the user. The user selects the desired option and can monitor the status of that virtual cluster via web and email updates. When the virtual cluster is ready, web and email notification is provided including access information. The customer logs in and begins working.
The hosting center 102 will have related policies and service level agreements. Enabling access in a first come-first served model provides real benefits but in many cases, customers require reliable resource access with guaranteed responsiveness. These requirements may be any performance, resource or time based rule such as in the following examples: I need my virtual cluster within 24 hours of asking; I want a virtual cluster available from 2 to 4 PM every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; I want to always have a virtual cluster available and automatically grow/shrink it based on current load, etc.
Quality of service or service level agreement policies allow customers to convert the virtual cluster resources to a strategic part of their business operations greatly increasing the value of these resources. Behind the scenes, a hosting center 102 consists of resource managers, reservations, triggers, and policies. Once configured, administration of such a system involves addressing reported resource failures (i.e., disk failures, network outages, etc) and monitoring delivered performance to determine if customer satisfaction requires tuning policies or adding resources.
The modules associated with the local environment 104 and the hosting center environment 102 may be referred to as a master module 108 and a slave module 106. This terminology relates to the functionality wherein the hosting center 102 receives requests for workload and provisioning of resources from the module 108 and essentially follows those requests. In this regard, the module 108 may be referred to as a client resource broker 108 which will contact a provider resource broker 106 (such as an On-Demand version of Moab).
The management module 108 may also be, by way of example, a Moab Workload Manager® operating in a master mode. The management module 108 communicates with the compute environment to identify resources, reserve resources for consumption by jobs, provision resources and in general manage the utilization of all compute resources within a compute environment. As can be appreciated by one of skill in the art, these modules may be programmed in any programming language, such as C or C++ and which language is immaterial to the invention.
In a typical operation, a user or a group submits a job to a local compute environment 104 via an interface to the management module 108. An example of a job is a submission of a computer program that will perform a weather analysis for a television station that requires the consumption of a large amount of compute resources. The module 108 and/or an optional scheduler 128 such as TORQUE, as those of skill in the art understand, manages the reservation of resources and the consumption of resources within the environment 104 in an efficient manner that complies with policies and restrictions. The use of a resource manager like TORQUE 128 is optional and not specifically required as part of the disclosure.
A user or a group of users will typically enter into a service level agreement (SLA) which will define the policies and guarantees for resources on the local environment 104. For example, the SLA may provide that the user is guaranteed 10 processors and 50 GB of hard drive space within 5 hours of a submission of a job request. Associated with any user may be many parameters related to permissions, guarantees, priority level, time frames, expansion factors, and so forth. The expansion factor is a measure of how long the job is taking to run on a local environment while sharing the environment with other jobs versus how long it would take if the cluster was dedicated to the job only. It therefore relates to the impact of other jobs on the performance of the particular job. Once a job is submitted and will sit in a job queue waiting to be inserted into the cluster 104 to consume those resources. The management software will continuously analyze the environment 104 and make reservations of resources to seek to optimize the consumption of resources within the environment 104. The optimization process must take into account all the SLA's of users, other policies of the environment 104 and other factors.
As introduced above, this disclosure provides improvements in the connectivity between a local environment 104 and an on-demand center 102. The challenges that exist in accomplishing such a connection include managing all of the capabilities of the various environments, their various policies, current workload, workload queued up in the job queues and so forth.
As a general statement, disclosed herein is a method and system for customizing an on-demand compute environment based on both implicit and explicit job or request requirements. For example, explicit requirements may be requirements specified with a job such as a specific number of nodes or processor and a specific amount of memory. Many other attributes or requirements may be explicitly set forth with a job submission such as requirements set forth in an SLA for that user. Implicit requirements may relate to attributes of the compute environment that the job is expecting because of where it is submitted. For example, the local compute environment 104 may have particular attributes, such as, for example, a certain bandwidth for transmission, memory, software licenses, processors and processor speeds, hard drive memory space, and so forth. Any parameter that may be an attribute of the local environment in which the job is submitted may relate to an implicit requirement. As a local environment 104 communicates with an on-demand environment 102 for the transfer of workload, the implicit and explicit requirements are seamlessly imported into the on-demand environment 102 such that the user's job can efficiently consume resources in the on-demand environment 102 because of the customization of that environment for the job. This seamless communication occurs between a master module 108 and a slave module 106 in the respective environments. As shown in
Part of the seamless communication process includes the analysis and provisioning of resources taking into account the need to identify resources such as hard drive space and bandwidth capabilities to actually perform the transfer of the workload. For example, if it is determined that a job in the queue has a SLA that guarantees resources within 5 hours of the request, and based on the analysis by the management module of the local environment the resources cannot be available for 8 hours, and if such a scenario is at triggering event, then the automatic and seamless connectivity with the on-demand center 102 will include an analysis of how long it will take to provision an environment in the on-demand center that matches or is appropriate for the job to run. That process, of provisioning the environment in the on-demand center 102, and transferring workload from the local environment 104 to the on-demand center 102, may take, for example, 1 hour. In that case, the on-demand center will begin the provisioning process one hour before the 5 hour required time such that the provisioning of the environment and transfer of data can occur to meet the SLA for that user. This provisioning process may involve reserving resources within the on-demand center 102 from the master module 108 as will be discussed more below.
Example triggering events may be related to at least one of a resource threshold, a service threshold, workload and a policy threshold or other factors. Furthermore, the event may be based one of all workload associated with the local compute environment or a subset of workload associated with the compute environment or any other subset of a given parameter or may be external to the compute environment such as a natural disaster or power outage or predicted event.
The disclosure below provides for various aspects of this connectivity process between a local environment 104 and an on-demand center 102. The CD submitted with the priority Provisional Patent Application includes source code that carries out this functionality. The various aspects will include an automatic triggering approach to transfer workload from the local environment 104 to the on-demand center 102, a manual “one-click” method of integrating the on-demand compute environment 102 with the local environment 104 and a concept related to reserving resources in the on-demand compute environment 102 from the local compute environment 104.
The first aspect relates to enabling the automatic detection of a triggering event such as passing a resource threshold or service threshold within the compute environment 104. This process may be dynamic and involve identifying resources in a hosting center, allocating resources and releasing them after consumption. These processes may be automated based on a number of factors, such as: workload and credential performance thresholds; a job's current time waiting in the queue for execution, (queuetime) (i.e., allocate if a job has waited more than 20 minutes to receive resources); a job's current expansion factor which relates to a comparison of the affect of other jobs consuming local resources has on the particular job in comparison to a value if the job was the only job consuming resources in the local environment; a job's current execution load (i.e., allocate if load on job's allocated resources exceeds 0.9); quantity of backlog workload (i.e., allocate if more than 50,000 proc-hours of workload exist); a job's average response time in handling transactions (i.e., allocate if job reports it is taking more than 0.5 seconds to process transaction); a number of failures workload has experienced allocate if a job cannot start after 10 attempts); overall system utilization (i.e., allocate if more than 80% of machine is utilized) and so forth. This is an example list and those of skill in the art will recognize other factors that may be identified as triggering events.
Other triggering events or thresholds may comprise a predicted workload performance threshold. This would relate to the same listing of events above but be applied in the context of predictions made by a management module or customer resource broker.
Another listing of example events that may trigger communication with the hosting center include, but are not limited to events such as resource failures including compute nodes, network, storage, license (i.e., including expired licenses); service failures including DNS, information services, web services, database services, security services; external event detected (i.e., power outage or national emergency reported) and so forth. These triggering events or thresholds may be applied to allocate initial resources, expand allocated resources, reduce allocated resources and release all allocated resources. Thus, while the primary discussion herein relates to an initial allocation of resources, these triggering events may cause any number of resource-related actions. Events and thresholds may also be associated with any subset of jobs or nodes (i.e., allocate only if threshold backlog is exceeded on high priority jobs only or jobs from a certain user or project or allocate resources only if certain service nodes fail or certain licenses become unavailable.)
For example, if a threshold of 95% of processor consumption is met by 951 processors out of the 1000 processors in the environment are being utilized, then the system (which may or may not include the management module 108) automatically establishes a connection with the on-demand environment 102. Another type of threshold may also trigger the automatic connection such as a service level received threshold, a service level predicted threshold, a policy-based threshold, a threshold or event associated with environment changes such as a resource failure (compute node, network storage device, or service failures).
In a service level threshold, one example is where a SLA specifies a certain service level requirement for a customer, such as resources available within 5 hours. If an actual threshold is not met, i.e., a job has waited now for 5 hours without being able to consume resource, or where a threshold is predicted to not be met, these can be triggering events for communication with the on-demand center. The module 108 then communicates with the slave manager 106 to provision or customize the on-demand resources 102. The two environments exchange the necessary information to create reservations of resources, provision, handle licensing, and so forth, necessary to enable the automatic transfer of jobs or other workload from the local environment 104 to the on-demand environment 102. For a particular task or job, all or part of the workload may be transferred to the on-demand center. Nothing about a user job 110 submitted to a management module 108 changes. The on-demand environment 102 then instantly begins running the job without any change in the job or perhaps even any knowledge of the submitter.
There are several aspects of the disclosure that are shown in the source code on the CD. One is the ability to exchange information. For example, for the automatic transfer of workload to the on-demand center, the system will import remote classes, configuration policy information and other information from the local scheduler 108 to the slave scheduler 106 for use by the on-demand environment 102. Information regarding the on-demand compute environment, resources, policies and so forth are also communicated from the slave module 106 to the local module 108.
The triggering event for the automatic establishment of communication with the on-demand center and a transfer of workload to the on-demand center may be a threshold that has been passed or an event that occurred. Threshold values may comprise an achieved service level, predicted service level and so forth. For example, a job sitting in a queue for a certain amount of time may trigger a process to contact the on-demand center and transfer that job to the on-demand center to run. If a queue has a certain number of jobs that have not been submitted to the compute environment for processing, if a job has an expansion factor that has a certain value, if a job has failed to start on a local cluster one or more times for whatever reason, then these types of events may trigger communication with the on-demand center. These have been examples of threshold values that when passed will trigger communication with the on-demand environment.
Example events that also may trigger the communication with the on-demand environment include, but are not limited to, events such as the failure of nodes within the environment, storage failure, service failure, license expiration, management software failure, resource manager fails, etc. In other words, any event that may be related to any resource or the management of any resource in the compute environment may be a qualifying event that may trigger workload transfer to an on-demand center. In the license expiration context, if the license in a local environment of a certain software package is going to expire such that a job cannot properly consume resources and utilize the software package, the master module 108 can communicate with the slave module 106 to determine if the on-demand center has the requisite license for that software. If so, then the provisioning of the resources in the on-demand center can be negotiated and the workload transferred wherein it can consume resources under an appropriate legal and licensed framework.
The basis for the threshold or the event that triggers the communication, provisioning and transfer of workload to the on-demand center may be all jobs/workload associated with the local compute environment or a subset of jobs/workload associated with the local compute environment. In other words, the analysis of when an event and/or threshold should trigger the transfer of workload may be based on a subset of jobs. For example, the analysis may be based on all jobs submitted from a particular person or group or may be based on a certain type of job, such as the subset of jobs that will require more than 5 hours of processing time to run. Any parameter may be defined for the subset of jobs used to base the triggering event.
The interaction and communication between the local compute environment and the on-demand compute environment enables an improved process for dynamically growing and shirking provisioned resource space based on load. This load balancing between the on-demand center and the local environment may be based on thresholds, events, all workload associated with the local environment or a subset of the local environment workload.
Another aspect of the disclosure is the ability to automate data management between two sites. This involves the transparent handling of data management between the on-demand environment 102 and the local environment 104 that is transparent to the user. Typically environmental information will always be communicated between the local environment 104 and the on-demand environment 102, In some cases, job information may not need to be communicated because a job may be gathering its own information, say from the Internet, or for other reasons. Therefore, in preparing to provision resources in the on-demand environment all information or a subset of information is communicated to enable the process. Yet another aspect of the invention relates to a simple and easy mechanism to enable on-demand center integration. This aspect of the invention involves the ability of the user or an administrator to, in a single action like the click of a button or a one-click action, be able to command the integration of an on-demand center information and capability into the local resource manager 108.
This feature is illustrated in
Another aspect provides for a method of integrating an on-demand compute environment into a local compute environment. The method comprises receiving a request from an administrator or via an automated command from an event trigger or administrator action to integrate an on-demand compute environment into a local compute environment. In response to the request, local workload information and/or resource configuration information is routed to an on-demand center and an environment is created and customized in the on-demand center that is compatible with workload requirements submitted to the local compute environment. Billing and costing are also automatically integrated and handled.
The exchange and integration of all the necessary information and resource knowledge may be performed in a single action or click to broaden the set of resources that may be available to users who have access initially only to the local compute environment 104. The system may receive the request to integrate an on-demand compute environment into a local compute environment in other manners as well, such as any type of multi-modal request, voice request, graffiti on a touch-sensitive screen request, motion detection, and so forth. Thus the one-click action may be a single tap on a touch sensitive display or a single voice command such as “integrate” or another command or multi-modal input that is simple and singular in nature. In response to the request, the system automatically integrates the local compute environment information with the on-demand compute environment information to enable resources from the on-demand compute environment available to requesters of resources in the local compute environment.
The one-click approach relates to the automated approach expect a human is in the middle of the process. For example, if a threshold or a triggering; event is passed, an email or a notice may be sent to an administrator with options to allocate resources from the on-demand center. The administrator may be presented with one or more options related to different types of allocations that are available in the on-demand center and via one-click or one action the administrator may select the appropriate action. For example, three options may include 500 processors in 1 hour; 700 processors in 2 hours; and 1000 processors in 10 hours. The options may be intelligent in that they may take into account the particular triggering event, costs of utilizing the on-demand environment, SLAs, policies, and any other parameters to present options that comply with policies and available resources. The administrator may be given a recommended selection based on SLAs, cost, or any other parameters discussed herein but may then choose the particular allocation package for the on-demand center. The administrator also may have an option, without an alert, to view possible allocation packages in the on-demand center if the administrator knows of an upcoming event that is not capable of being detected by the modules, such as a meeting with a group wherein they decide to submit a large job the next day which will clearly require on-demand resources. The one-click approach encapsulates the command line instruction to proceed with the allocation of on-demand resources.
One of the aspects of the disclosure is the integration of an on-demand environment 102 and a local compute environment 104 is that the overall data appears locally. In other words, the local scheduler 108 will have access to the resources and knowledge of the on-demand environment 102 but those resources, with the appropriate adherence to local policy requirements, is handled locally and appears locally to users and administrators of the local environment 104.
Another aspect of the invention that is enabled with the attached source code is the ability to specify configuration information and feeding it down the line. For example, the interaction between the compute environments supports static reservations. A static reservation is a reservation that a user or an administrator cannot change, remove or destroy. It is a reservation that is associated with the resource manager 108 itself. A static reservation blocks out time frames when resources are not available for other uses. For example, if to enable a compute environment to have workload run on (or consume) resources, a job takes an hour to provision a resources, then the module 108 may make a static reservation of resources for the provisioning process. The module 108 will locally create a static reservation for the provisioning component of running the job. The module 108 will report on these constraints associated with the created static reservation within the on-demand compute environment.
Then, the module 108 will communicate with the slave module 106 if on-demand resources are needed to run a job. The module 108 communicates with the slave module 106 and identifies what resources are needed (20 processors and 512 MB of memory, for example) and inquires when can those resources be available. Assume that module 106 responds that the processors and memory will be available in one hour and that the module 108 can have those resources for 36 hours. Once all the appropriate information has been communicated between the modules 106 and 108, then module 108 creates a static reservation to block the first part of the resources which requires the one hour of provisioning. The module 108 may also block out the resources with a static reservation from hour 36 to infinity until the resources go away. Therefore, from zero to one hour is blocked out by a static reservation and from the end of the 36 hours to infinity is blocked out. In this way, the scheduler 108 can optimize the on-demand resources and insure that they are available for local workloads. The communication between the modules 106 and 108 is performed preferably via tunneling.
Another aspect relates to receiving requests or information associated with resources in an on-demand center. An example will illustrate. Assume that a company has a reservation of resources within an on-demand center but then finds out that their budget is cut for the year. There is a mechanism for an administrator to enter information such as a request for a cancellation of a reservation so that they do not have to pay for the consumption of those resources. Any type of modification of the on-demand resources may be contemplated here. This process involves translating a current or future state of the environment for a requirement of the modification of usable resources. Another example includes where a group determines that they will run a large job over the weekend that will knowingly need more than the local environment. An administrator can submit in the local resource broker 108 a submission of information associated with a parameter such as a request for resources and the local broker 108 will communicate with the hosting center 106 and the necessary resources can be reserved in the on-demand center even before the job is submitted to the local environment.
The modification of resources within the on-demand center may be an increase, decrease, or cancellation of resources or reservations for resources. The parameters may be a direct request for resources or a modification of resources or may be a change in an SLA which then may trigger other modifications. For example, if an SLA prevented a user from obtaining more than 500 nodes in an on-demand center and a current reservation has maximized this request, a change in the SLA agreement that extended this parameter may automatically cause the module 106 to increase the reservation of nodes according to the modified SLA. Changing policies in this manner may or may not affect the resources in the on-demand center.
Receiving resource requirement information may be based on user specification, current or predicted workload. The specification of resources may be fully explicit, or may be partially or fully implicit based on workload or based on virtual private cluster (VPC) package concept where VPC package can include aspects of allocated or provisioning support environment and adjustments to resource request timeframes including pre-allocation, allocation duration, and post-allocation time-frame adjustments. The Application incorporated above provides information associated with the VPC that may be utilized in many respects in this invention. The reserved resources may be associated with provisioning or customizing the delivered compute environment. A reservation may involve the co-allocation of resources including any combination of compute, network, storage, license, or service resources (i.e., parallel database services, security services, provisioning services) as part of a reservation across multiple different resource types. Also, the co-allocation of resources over disjoint timeframes to improve availability and utilization of resources may be part of a reservation or a modification of resources. Resources may also be reserved with automated failure handling and resource recovery.
Another feature associated with reservations of resources within the on-demand environment is the use of provisioning padding. This is an alternate approach to the static reservation discussed above. For example, if a reservation of resources would require 2 hours of processing time for 5 nodes, then that reservation may be created in the on-demand center as directed by the client resource broker 108. As part of that same reservation or as part of a separate process, the reservation may be modified or adjusted to increase its duration to accommodate for provisioning overhead and clean up processes. Therefore, there may need to be ½ hour of time in advance of the beginning of the two hour block wherein data transmission, operating system set up, or any other provisioning step needs to occur. Similarly, at the end of the two hours, there may need to be 15 minutes to clean up the nodes and transmit processed data to storage or back to the local compute environment. Thus, an adjustment of the reservation may occur to account for this provisioning in the on-demand environment. This may or may not occur automatically, for example, the user may request resources for 2 hours and the system may automatically analyze the job submitted or utilize other information to automatically, adjust the reservation for the provisioning needs. The administrator may also understand the provisioning needs and specifically request a reservation with provisioning pads on one or both ends of the reservation.
A job may also be broken into component parts and only one aspect of the job transferred to an on-demand center for processing. In that case, the modules will work together to enable co-allocation of resources across local resources and on-demand resources. For example, memory and processors may be allocated in the local environment while disk space is allocated in the on-demand center. In this regard, the local management module could request the particular resources needed for the co-allocation from the on-demand center and when the job is submitted for processing that portion of the job would consume on-demand center resources while the remaining portion of the job consumes local resources. This also may be a manual or automated process to handle the co-allocation of resources.
Another aspect relates to interaction between the master management module 106 and the slave management module 106. Assume a scenario where the local compute environment requests immediate resources from the on-demand center. Via the communication between the local and the on-demand environments, the on-demand environment notifies the local environment that resources are not available for eight hours but provides the information about those resources in the eight hours. At the local environment, the management module 108 may instruct the on-demand management module 106 to establish a reservation for those resources as soon as possible (in eight hours) including, perhaps, provisioning padding for overhead. Thus, although the local environment requested immediate resources from the on-demand center, the best that could be done in this case is a reservation of resources in eight hours given the provisioning needs and other workload and jobs running on the on-demand center. Thus, jobs running or in the queue at the local environment will have an opportunity to tap into the reservation and given a variety of parameters, say job number 12 has priority or an opportunity to get a first choice of those reserved resources.
With reference to
Although the exemplary environment described herein employs the hard disk, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, memory cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) read only memory (ROM), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment. The system above provides an example server or computing device that may be utilized and networked with a cluster, clusters or a grid to manage the resources according to the principles set forth herein. It is also recognized that other hardware configurations may be developed in the future upon which the method may be operable.
Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure can also include transitory or non-transitory computer-readable media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can include RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or combination thereof) to a computer, the computer properly views the connection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of the computer-readable media. Non-transitory computer readable media excludes energy and signals per se.
Computer-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Computer-executable instructions also include program modules that are executed by computers in stand-alone or network environments. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of the program code means for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that other embodiments of the disclosure can be practiced in network computing environments with many types of computer system configurations, including personal computers, hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by local and remote processing devices that are linked (either by hardwired links, wireless links, or by a combination thereof) through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Although the above description can contain specific details, they should not be construed as limiting the claims in any way. Other configurations of the described embodiments of the disclosure are part of the scope of this disclosure. Accordingly, the appended claims and their legal equivalents should only define the disclosure, rather than any specific examples given.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/722,062, filed Apr. 15, 2022, which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 17/201,245, filed. Mar. 15, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/398,025, filed Apr. 29, 2019 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,986,037), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/791,873, filed Jul. 6, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,277,531), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/279,007, filed. Apr. 7, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,075,657), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/669,278 filed. Apr. 7, 2005, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4215406 | Gomola et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4412288 | Herman | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4525780 | Bratt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4532893 | Day et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4542458 | Kitajima | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4553202 | Trufyn | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4677614 | Circo | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4850891 | Walkup et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4852001 | Tsushima et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4943932 | Lark et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4992958 | Kageyama | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5132625 | Shaland | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5146561 | Carey et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5168441 | Onarheim | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175800 | Galis et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5257374 | Hammer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5276877 | Friedrich | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5299115 | Fields et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5307496 | Ichinose et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5325526 | Cameron et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5349682 | Rosenberry | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355508 | Kan | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5377332 | Entwistle et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5408663 | Miller | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5451936 | Yang et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5473773 | Aman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5477546 | Shibata | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5495533 | Linehan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5504894 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5542000 | Semba | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550970 | Cline et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5594901 | Andoh | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594908 | Hyatt | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598536 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600844 | Shaw et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5623641 | Kadoyashiki | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623672 | Popat | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5651006 | Fujino et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652841 | Nemirovsky et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5666293 | Metz | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5675739 | Eilert et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5701451 | Rogers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5729754 | Estes | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5732077 | Whitehead | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734818 | Kern et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737009 | Payton | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5752030 | Konno et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757771 | Li | May 1998 | A |
| 5761433 | Billings | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761475 | Yung | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761484 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765146 | Wolf | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774668 | Choquier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781187 | Gephardt et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781624 | Mitra et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787459 | Stallmo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5799174 | Muntz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801985 | Roohparvar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5826080 | Dworzecki | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826082 | Bishop et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826236 | Narimatsu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826239 | Du et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828888 | Kozaki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832517 | Knutsen, II | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5854887 | Kindell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5862478 | Cutler, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5867382 | McLaughlin | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874789 | Su | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5881238 | Aman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5901048 | Hu | May 1999 | A |
| 5908468 | Hartmann | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911143 | Deinhart et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913921 | Tosey | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918017 | Attanasio et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920545 | Raesaenen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5920863 | McKeehan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926798 | Carter | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930167 | Lee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933417 | Rottoo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935293 | Detering et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950190 | Yeager | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958003 | Preining et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961599 | Kalavade et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968176 | Nessett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971804 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978356 | Elwalid et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6003061 | Jones et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006192 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6012052 | Altschuler et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021425 | Waldron, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032224 | Blumenau | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6052707 | D'Souza | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055618 | Thorson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058416 | Mukherjee | May 2000 | A |
| 6067545 | Wolff | May 2000 | A |
| 6076174 | Freund | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078953 | Vaid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6079863 | Furukawa | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085238 | Yuasa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088718 | Altschuler et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6092178 | Jindal et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094712 | Follett | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097882 | Mogul | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6098090 | Burns | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101508 | Wolff | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105117 | Ripley | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108662 | Hoskins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6122664 | Boukobza | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6141214 | Ahn | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151598 | Shaw et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154778 | Koistinen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6161170 | Burger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167445 | Gai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6175869 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181699 | Crinion et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182139 | Brendel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182142 | Win et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185272 | Hiraoglu | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6185575 | Orcutt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6185601 | Wolff | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6189111 | Alexander | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192414 | Horn | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195678 | Komuro | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198741 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6201611 | Carter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202080 | Lu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6205465 | Schoening et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212542 | Kahle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223202 | Bayeh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226677 | Slemmer | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6226788 | Schoening | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6247056 | Chou et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252878 | Locklear | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253230 | Couland et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256704 | Hlava | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6259675 | Honda | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263359 | Fong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266667 | Olsson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269398 | Leong | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278712 | Takihiro et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282561 | Jones et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298352 | Kannan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304549 | Srinivasan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314114 | Coyle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314487 | Hahn et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314501 | Gulick et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314555 | Ndumu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317787 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324279 | Kalmanek, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327364 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330008 | Razdow et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330583 | Reiffin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330605 | Christensen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6333936 | Johansson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334114 | Jacobs | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6338085 | Ramaswamy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338112 | Wipfel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339717 | Baumgartl et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343311 | Nishida et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343488 | Hackfort | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6345287 | Fong et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6345294 | O'Toole et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349295 | Tedesco | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351775 | Yu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6353844 | Bitar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363434 | Eytchison | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363488 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366945 | Fong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370154 | Wickham | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370584 | Bestavros et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373841 | Goh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374254 | Cochran et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374297 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384842 | DeKoning | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6385302 | Antonucci et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392989 | Jardetzky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393569 | Orenshteyn | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393581 | Friedman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6400996 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6401133 | York | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6404768 | Basak et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405212 | Samu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405234 | Ventrone | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6418459 | Gulick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434568 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438125 | Brothers | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438134 | Chow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438553 | Yamada | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438652 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442137 | Yu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446192 | Narasimhan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452809 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452924 | Golden et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453349 | Kano et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453383 | Stoddard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460082 | Lumelsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463454 | Lumelsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464261 | Dybevik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466935 | Stuart | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466965 | Chessell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466980 | Lumelsky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477575 | Koeppel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6477580 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487390 | Virine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490432 | Wegener et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496566 | Posthuma | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496866 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6496872 | Katz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6502135 | Munger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505228 | Schoening et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507586 | Satran et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520591 | Jun et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526442 | Stupek, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529499 | Doshi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6529932 | Dadiomov et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538994 | Horspool | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6549940 | Allen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556952 | Magro | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571215 | Mahapatro | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571391 | Acharya et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574238 | Thrysoe | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574632 | Fox et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6578068 | Bowman-Amuah | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584489 | Jones et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584499 | Jantz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587469 | Bragg | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6587938 | Eilert et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6590587 | Wichelman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6600898 | Bonet et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6606660 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6618820 | Krum | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622168 | Datta | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626077 | Gilbert | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628649 | Raj et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629081 | Cornelius et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629148 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633544 | Rexford et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6636853 | Stephens, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6640145 | Hoffberg et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6640238 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6651098 | Carroll et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6651125 | Maergner | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6661671 | Franke et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6661787 | O'Connell et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662202 | Krusche et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662219 | Nishanov et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6668304 | Satran et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6687257 | Balasubramanian | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690400 | Moayyad et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690647 | Tang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701318 | Fox et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6704489 | Kurauchi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711691 | Howard et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6714778 | Nykanen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6724733 | Schuba et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6725456 | Bruno et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6735188 | Becker et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6735630 | Gelvin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6735716 | Podanoffsky | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6738736 | Bond | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6738974 | Nageswaran | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745246 | Erimli et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6748559 | Pfister | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757723 | O'Toole et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757897 | Shi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6760306 | Pan et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6763519 | McColl et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6766389 | Hayter et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6771661 | Chawla et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6772211 | Lu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6775701 | Pan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6779016 | Aziz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6781990 | Puri et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785724 | Drainville et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785794 | Chase et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6813676 | Henry et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6816750 | Klaas | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6816903 | Rakoshitz et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6816905 | Sheets et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6823377 | Wu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6826607 | Gelvin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829206 | Watanabe | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6829762 | Arimilli et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6832251 | Gelvin et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6836806 | Raciborski et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6842430 | Melnik | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6850966 | Matsuura et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6857020 | Chaar et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6857026 | Cain | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6857938 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6859831 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6859927 | Moody et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6862606 | Major et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6868097 | Soda et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6874031 | Corbeil | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6882718 | Smith | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6894792 | Abe | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6904460 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6912533 | Hornick | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6922664 | Fernandez et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6925431 | Papaefstathiou | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6928471 | Pabari et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931640 | Asano et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6934702 | Faybishenko et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6938256 | Deng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6947982 | McGann et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6948171 | Dan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950821 | Faybishenko et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950833 | Costello et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952828 | Greene | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6954784 | Aiken et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6963917 | Callis et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6963926 | Robinson | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6963948 | Gulick | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6965930 | Arrowood et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6966033 | Gasser et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6968323 | Bansal et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6971098 | Khare et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6975609 | Khaleghi et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6977939 | Joy et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978310 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6978447 | Okmianski | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6985461 | Singh | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6985937 | Keshav et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6988170 | Barroso et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990063 | Lenoski et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6990677 | Pietraszak et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6996821 | Butterworth | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 6996822 | Willen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7003414 | Wichelman et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7006881 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7013303 | Faybishenko et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013322 | Lahr | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7017186 | Day | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020695 | Kundu et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020719 | Grove et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7032119 | Fung | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034686 | Matsumura | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035230 | Shaffer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7035240 | Balakrishnan et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7035854 | Hsiao et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7035911 | Lowery et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7043605 | Suzuki | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058070 | Tran et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7058716 | Sundaresan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7058951 | Bril et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065579 | Traversal et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065764 | Prael et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072807 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076717 | Grossman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080078 | Slaughter et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7080283 | Songer et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7080285 | Kosugi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080378 | Noland et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7082606 | Wood et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7085825 | Pishevar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7085837 | Kimbrel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7085893 | Krissell et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7089294 | Baskey et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7093256 | Bloks | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7095738 | Desanti | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7099933 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7100192 | Igawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7102996 | Amdahl et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7103625 | Hipp et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7103664 | Novaes et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107578 | Alpem | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107589 | Tal | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7117208 | Tamayo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7117273 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7119591 | Lin | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124289 | Suorsa | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124410 | Berg et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126913 | Patel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7127613 | Pabla et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7127633 | Olson et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7136927 | Traversal et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7140020 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143088 | Green et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143153 | Black et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143168 | DiBiasio et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7145995 | Oltmanns et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146233 | Aziz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146353 | Garg et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146416 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7150044 | Hoefelmeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7154621 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155478 | Ims et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155502 | Galloway et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165107 | Pouyoul et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7165120 | Giles et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7167920 | Traversal et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168049 | Day | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7170315 | Bakker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171415 | Kan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171476 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171491 | O'Toole et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7171593 | Whittaker | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7177823 | Lam et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7180866 | Chartre et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7185046 | Ferstl et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185073 | Gai et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7185077 | O'Toole et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7188145 | Lowery et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7188174 | Rolia et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191244 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197071 | Weigand | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197549 | Salama et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197559 | Goldstein et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197561 | Lovy et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7197565 | Abdelaziz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200716 | Aiello | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7203063 | Bash et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7203746 | Harrop | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7203753 | Yeager et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206819 | Schmidt | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206841 | Traversal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206934 | Pabla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7213047 | Yeager et et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7213050 | Shaffer et et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7213062 | Raciborski et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7213065 | Watt | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7216173 | Clayton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222187 | Yeager et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222343 | Heyrman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225249 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7225442 | Dutta et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228350 | Hong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231445 | Aweya et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7233569 | Swallow | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7233669 | Swallow | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236915 | Algieri et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7237243 | Sutton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7242501 | Ishimoto | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7243351 | Kundu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249179 | Romero et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7251222 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7251688 | Leighton et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7254608 | Yeager et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257655 | Burney et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7260846 | Day | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263288 | Islam | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263560 | Abdelaziz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263596 | Wideman | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7274705 | Chang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275018 | Abu-El-Zeet et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275102 | Yeager et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275249 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7278008 | Case et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7278142 | Bandhole et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7278582 | Siegel et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7281045 | Aggarwal et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283838 | Lu | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7284109 | Paxie et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7289619 | Vivadelli et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289985 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7293092 | Sukegawa | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7296268 | Darling et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7299294 | Bruck et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7305464 | Phillipi et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308496 | Yeager et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7308687 | Trossman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310319 | Awsienko et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7313793 | Traut et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315887 | Liang et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7320025 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7324555 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7325050 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328243 | Yeager et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7328264 | Babka | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7328406 | Kalinoski et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7334108 | Case et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7334230 | Chung et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337333 | O'Conner et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337446 | Sankaranarayan et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340500 | Traversal et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7340578 | Khanzode | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7340777 | Szor | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7343467 | Brown et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349348 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7350186 | Coleman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353276 | Bain et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7353362 | Georgiou et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7353495 | Somogyi | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356655 | Allen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356770 | Jackson | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7363346 | Groner et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366101 | Varier et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7366719 | Shaw | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7370092 | Aderton et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373391 | Iinuma | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7373524 | Motsinger et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7376693 | Neiman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7380039 | Miloushev et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7382154 | Ramos et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7383433 | Yeager et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386586 | Headley et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7386611 | Dias et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386850 | Mullen | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386888 | Liang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7389310 | Bhagwan et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7392325 | Grove et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7392360 | Aharoni | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7395536 | Verbeke et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7395537 | Brown | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7398216 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7398471 | Rambacher | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7398525 | Leymann | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7401114 | Block et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7401152 | Traversal et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7401153 | Traversal et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7401355 | Supnik et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403994 | Vogl et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7409433 | Lowery et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7412492 | Waldspurger | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7412703 | Cleary et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7415709 | Hipp et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7418518 | Grove et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7418534 | Hayter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421402 | Chang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7421500 | Talwar et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7423971 | Mohaban et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7426489 | Van Soestbergen et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7426546 | Breiter et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7428540 | Coates et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7433304 | Galloway et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7437460 | Chidambaran et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7437540 | Paolucci et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7437730 | Goyal | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441261 | Slater et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7447147 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7447197 | Terrell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7451197 | Davis | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7451199 | Kandefer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7451201 | Alex et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7454467 | Girouard et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7461134 | Ambrose | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7463587 | Rajsic et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464159 | Luoffo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464160 | Iszlai et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466712 | Makishima et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7466810 | Quon et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7467225 | Anerousis et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467306 | Cartes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467358 | Kang et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7475419 | Basu et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7483945 | Blumofe | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7484008 | Gelvin et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7484225 | Hugly et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487254 | Walsh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7487509 | Hugly et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492720 | Pruthi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7496494 | Altman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7502747 | Pardo et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7502884 | Shah et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7503045 | Aziz et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7505463 | Schuba | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512649 | Faybishenko et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7512894 | Hintermeister | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7516221 | Souder et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7516455 | Matheson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7519677 | Lowery et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7519843 | Buterbaugh et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7526479 | Zenz | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7529835 | Agronow et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7533141 | Nadgir et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7533161 | Hugly et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7533172 | Traversal et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7533385 | Barnes | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7536541 | Isaacson | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7543052 | Klein | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7546553 | Bozak et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7551614 | Teisberg et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7554930 | Gaddis et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7555666 | Brundridge et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7562143 | Fellenstein et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568199 | Bozak et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7570943 | Sorvari et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7571438 | Jones et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7574523 | Traversal et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577722 | Khandekar et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7577834 | Traversat et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7577959 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580382 | Amis et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7580919 | Hannel | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7583607 | Steele et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7583661 | Chaudhuri | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7584274 | Bond et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7586841 | Vasseur | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590746 | Slater et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590747 | Coates et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594011 | Chandra | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594015 | Bozak et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596144 | Pong | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596784 | Abrams et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599360 | Edsall et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606225 | Xie et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606245 | Ma et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610266 | Cascaval | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610289 | Muret et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7613796 | Harvey et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7616646 | Ma et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7620057 | Aloni et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7620635 | Hornick | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620706 | Jackson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7624118 | Schipunov et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7624194 | Kakivaya et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627691 | Buchsbaum et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7631066 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7631307 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640353 | Shen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640547 | Neiman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7644215 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7657535 | Moyaux et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657597 | Arora et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657626 | Zwicky | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7657677 | Huang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657756 | Hall | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657779 | Kaminsky | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7660887 | Reedy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7660922 | Harriman | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7664110 | Lovett et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7665090 | Tormasov et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7668809 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7673164 | Agarwal | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7680933 | Fatula, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685281 | Saraiya et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7685599 | Kanai et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685602 | Tran et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689661 | Lowery et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693976 | Perry et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7693993 | Sheets et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7694076 | Lowery et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7694305 | Karlsson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698386 | Amidon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698398 | Lai | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698430 | Jackson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7701948 | Rabie et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702779 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7707088 | Schmelzer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7707185 | Czezatke | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7710936 | Morales Barroso | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7711652 | Schmelzer | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7716193 | Krishnamoorthy | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7716334 | Rao et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7719834 | Miyamoto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7721125 | Fung | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7725583 | Jackson | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7730220 | Hasha et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7730262 | Lowery et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7730488 | Ilzuka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739308 | Baffler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739541 | Rao et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7742425 | El-Damhougy | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742476 | Branda et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7743147 | Suorsa et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747451 | Keohane et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| RE41440 | Briscoe et al. | Jul 2010 | E |
| 7751433 | Dollo et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752258 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752624 | Crawford, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756658 | Kulkarni et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7757236 | Singh | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7760720 | Pullela et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7761557 | Fellenstein et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7761687 | Blumrich et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765288 | Bainbridge et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765299 | Romero | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7769620 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7769803 | Birdwell et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7770120 | Baudisch | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7774331 | Barth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7774495 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7778234 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7782813 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7783777 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7783786 | Lauterbach | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7783910 | Felter et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788403 | Darugar et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788477 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7791894 | Bechtolsheim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7792113 | Foschiano et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7793288 | Sameske | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7796399 | Clayton et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7796619 | Feldmann et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7797367 | Gelvin et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7797393 | Qiu et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801132 | Ofek et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7802017 | Uemura et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7805448 | Andrzejak et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7805575 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7810090 | Gebhart | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7813822 | Hoffberg | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7827361 | Karlsson et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7830820 | Duke et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831839 | Hatakeyama | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840353 | Ouksel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840703 | Arimilli et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7840810 | Eastham | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7844687 | Gelvin et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7844787 | Ranganathan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7848262 | El-Damhougy | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849139 | Wolfson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849140 | Abdel-Aziz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853880 | Porter | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860999 | Subramanian et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7865614 | Lu et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7886023 | Johnson | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7889675 | Mack-Crane et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890571 | Kriegsman | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7890701 | Lowery et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7891004 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| RE42262 | Stephens, Jr. | Mar 2011 | E |
| 7899047 | Cabrera et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7899864 | Margulis | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7900206 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7904569 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7925795 | Tamir et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7930397 | Midgley | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7934005 | Fascenda | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7958262 | Hasha et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970830 | Staggs | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7970929 | Mahalingaiah | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7971204 | Jackson | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7975032 | Lowery et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7975035 | Popescu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7975110 | Spaur et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7984137 | O'Toole, Jr. et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7984183 | Andersen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991817 | Dehon et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7991922 | Hayter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7992151 | Warrier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7992983 | Nanjo | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7995501 | Jetcheva et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7996510 | Vicente | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8000288 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8014408 | Habetha et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8018860 | Cook | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8019832 | De Sousa et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032634 | Eppstein | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8037202 | Yeager et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8037475 | Jackson | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8041773 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8055788 | Chan et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8060552 | Hinni et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060760 | Shetty et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8060775 | Sharma et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
| 8073978 | Sengupta et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8078708 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8079118 | Gelvin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8082400 | Chang et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
| 8090880 | Hasha et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8095600 | Hasha et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8095601 | Hasha et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103543 | Zwicky | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8108455 | Yeager et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8108508 | Goh et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8108512 | Howard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8108930 | Hoefelmeyer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8122269 | Houlihan et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8132034 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8135812 | Lowery et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8140658 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8151103 | Jackson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8155113 | Agarwal | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8156362 | Branover et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8160077 | Traversat et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8161391 | McCleiland et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8165120 | Maruccia et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166063 | Andersen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8166204 | Basu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170040 | Konda | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8171136 | Petite | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8176189 | Traversat et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8176490 | Jackson | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8180996 | Fullerton et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8185776 | Gentes et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8189612 | Lemaire et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8194659 | Ban | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8196133 | Kakumani et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8199636 | Rouyer et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8204992 | Arora et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8205044 | Lowery et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8205103 | Kazama et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8205210 | Cleary et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8244671 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8260893 | Bandhole et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8261349 | Peng | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266321 | Johnston-Watt et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271628 | Lowery et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271980 | Jackson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8275881 | Fellenslein et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8302100 | Deng et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8321048 | Coss et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8346591 | Fellenslein et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8346908 | Vanyukhin et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8359397 | Traversal et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8370898 | Jackson | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8379425 | Fukuoka et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8380846 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8386622 | Jacobson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8392515 | Kakivaya et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396757 | Fellenslein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8397092 | Karnowski | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8402540 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8407428 | Cheriton et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8413155 | Jackson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8417715 | Bruckhaus et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8417813 | Kakivaya et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8458333 | Stoica et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8463867 | Robertson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8464250 | Ansel | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8484382 | Das et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8495201 | Klincewicz | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8504663 | Lowery et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8504791 | Cheriton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8516470 | van Rietschote | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8544017 | Prael et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8554920 | Chen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8560639 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8572326 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| RE44610 | Krakirian et al. | Nov 2013 | E |
| 8578130 | DeSota et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8584129 | Czajkowski | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8589517 | Hoefelmeyer et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8599863 | Davis | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8601595 | Gelvin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8606800 | Lagad et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8615602 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8626820 | Levy | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8631130 | Jackson | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8684802 | Gross et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8701121 | Saffre | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8726278 | Shawver et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8737410 | Davis | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8738860 | Griffin et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8745275 | Ikeya et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8745302 | Davis et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8782120 | Jackson | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8782231 | Jackson | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8782321 | Harriman et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8782654 | Jackson | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8812400 | Faraboschi et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8824485 | Biswas et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8826270 | Lewis | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8854831 | Arnouse | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8863143 | Jackson | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8903964 | Breslin | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8924560 | Pang | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8930536 | Jackson | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8954584 | Subbarayan et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 9008079 | Davis et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9038078 | Jackson | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9054990 | Davis | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9060060 | Lobig | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9069611 | Jackson | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9069929 | Borland | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9075655 | Davis et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9075657 | Jackson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9077654 | Davis | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9092594 | Borland | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9112813 | Jackson | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9116755 | Jackson | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9128767 | Jackson | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9152455 | Jackson | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9176785 | Jackson | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9231886 | Jackson | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9258276 | Dalal et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9262225 | Davis | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9268607 | Jackson | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9288147 | Kern | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9304896 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9311269 | Davis | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9367802 | Arndt et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9405584 | Davis | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9413687 | Jackson | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9450875 | Tong | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9454403 | Davis | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9465771 | Davis et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9479463 | Davis | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9491064 | Jackson | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9509552 | Davis | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9575805 | Jackson | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9585281 | Schnell | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9602573 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9619296 | Jackson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9648102 | Davis et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9680770 | Davis | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9749326 | Davis | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9778959 | Jackson | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9785479 | Jackson | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9792249 | Borland | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9825860 | Hu | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9866477 | Davis | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9876735 | Davis | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9886322 | Jackson | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9929976 | Davis | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9959140 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9959141 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9961013 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9965442 | Borland | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9977763 | Davis | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9979672 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10021806 | Schnell | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10050970 | Davis | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10135731 | Davis | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10140245 | Davis et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10212092 | Dalal et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10277531 | Jackson | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10311014 | Dalton | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10333862 | Jackson | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10379909 | Jackson | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10445146 | Jackson | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10445148 | Jackson | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10585704 | Jackson | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10608949 | Jackson | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10733028 | Jackson | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10735505 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10871999 | Jackson | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10951487 | Jackson | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10977090 | Jackson | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11132277 | Dalton | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11134022 | Jackson | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11144355 | Jackson | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 11356385 | Jackson | Jun 2022 | B2 |
| 11467883 | Jackson | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 11494235 | Jackson | Nov 2022 | B2 |
| 11496415 | Jackson | Nov 2022 | B2 |
| 11522811 | Jackson | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11522952 | Abu-Ghazaleh | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11526304 | Davis et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11533274 | Jackson | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11537434 | Jackson | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11537435 | Jackson | Dec 2022 | B2 |
| 11630704 | Jackson | Apr 2023 | B2 |
| 11650857 | Jackson | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11652706 | Jackson | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11656907 | Jackson | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11658916 | Jackson | May 2023 | B2 |
| 11709709 | Jackson | Jul 2023 | B2 |
| 20010015733 | Sklar | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010023431 | Horiguchi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034752 | Kremien | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037311 | McCoy et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044667 | Nakano | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044759 | Kutsumi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010046227 | Matsuhira et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051929 | Suzuki | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052016 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010052108 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002578 | Yamashita | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020002636 | Vange et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004833 | Tonouchi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004912 | Fung | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007389 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010783 | Primak et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016809 | Foulger | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018481 | Mor et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020031364 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032716 | Nagato | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035605 | Kenton | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040391 | Chaiken et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049608 | Hartsell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052909 | Seeds | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052961 | Yoshimine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059094 | Hosea et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059274 | Hartsell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062377 | Hillman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062451 | Scheidt et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062465 | Goto | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065864 | Hartsell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083299 | Van Huben et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083352 | Fujimoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087611 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087699 | Karagiannis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090075 | Gabriel | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091786 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020093915 | Larson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020097732 | Worster et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099842 | Jennings et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103886 | Rawson, III | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107903 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107962 | Richter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116234 | Nagasawa | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116721 | Dobes et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120741 | Webb et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124128 | Qiu | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129160 | Habelha | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129274 | Baskey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133537 | Lau et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133821 | Shteyn | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137565 | Blanco | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138459 | Mandal | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138635 | Redlich et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143855 | Traversat | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143944 | Traversal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147663 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147771 | Traversal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147810 | Traversal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151271 | Tatsuji | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152299 | Traversal et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152305 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156699 | Gray et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156891 | Ulrich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156893 | Pouyoul et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156904 | Gullotta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156984 | Padovano | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159452 | Foster et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161869 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161917 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166110 | Powell | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166117 | Abrams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172205 | Tagore-Brage et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173984 | Robertson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174165 | Kawaguchi | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174227 | Hartsell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184129 | Arena | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184310 | Traversal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184311 | Traversal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184357 | Traversal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184358 | Traversal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186656 | Vu | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188657 | Traversal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194384 | Habelha | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194412 | Bottom | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196611 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196734 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198734 | Greene et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198923 | Hayes | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004772 | Dutta et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005130 | Cheng | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005162 | Habelha | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030007493 | Oi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009506 | Bril et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014503 | Legout et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014524 | Tormasov | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014539 | Reznick | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014613 | Soni | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018573 | Comas | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018766 | Duvvuru | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018803 | El Batt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028585 | Yeager et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028642 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028645 | Romagnoli | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028656 | Babka | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033547 | Larson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036820 | Yellepeddy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039246 | Guo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041141 | Abdelaziz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041266 | Ke et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041308 | Ganesan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046330 | Hayes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050924 | Faybishenko et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050959 | Faybishenko et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050989 | Marinescu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051127 | Miwa | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055894 | Yeager et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055898 | Yeager et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058277 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061260 | Rajkumar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061261 | Greene | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061262 | Hahn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065703 | Aborn | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065784 | Herrod | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069828 | Blazey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069918 | Lu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069949 | Chan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072263 | Peterson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074090 | Becka | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076832 | Ni | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084435 | Messer | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088457 | Keil et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093255 | Freyensee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093624 | Arimilli et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097284 | Shinozaki | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097429 | Wu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030101084 | Perez | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030103413 | Jacobi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105655 | Kimbrel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105721 | Ginter et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110262 | Hasan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112792 | Cranor et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115562 | Martin | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120472 | Lind | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120701 | Pulsipher et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120704 | Tran et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120710 | Pulsipher et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120780 | Zhu | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126013 | Shand | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126200 | Wolff | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126202 | Watt | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126265 | Aziz et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126283 | Prakash et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131043 | Berg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131209 | Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135509 | Davis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135615 | Wyatt | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135621 | Romagnoli | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140190 | Mahony et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144894 | Robertson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149685 | Trossman et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154112 | Neiman et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158884 | Alford | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158940 | Leigh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030159083 | Fukuhara et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030169269 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172191 | Williams | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177050 | Crampton | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177121 | Moona et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030177334 | King et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182421 | Faybishenko et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182425 | Kurakake | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182429 | Jagels | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182496 | Yoo | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185229 | Shachar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187907 | Ito | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188083 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191795 | Bernardin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191857 | Terrell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193402 | Post et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195931 | Dauger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200109 | Honda et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200258 | Hayashi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202520 | Witkowski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202709 | Simard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204709 | Rich | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204773 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204786 | Dinker | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210694 | Jayaraman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212738 | Wookey et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212792 | Raymond | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216927 | Sridhar | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216951 | Ginis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217129 | Knittel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030227934 | White | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231624 | Alappat et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231647 | Petrovykh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233378 | Butler et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233446 | Earl | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236745 | Hartsell et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003077 | Bantz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003086 | Parham et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040009751 | Michaelis | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010544 | Slater et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010550 | Gopinath | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010592 | Carver et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040011761 | Dewa | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040013113 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015579 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015973 | Skovira | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040017806 | Yazdy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040017808 | Forbes et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024853 | Cates | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030741 | Wolton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030743 | Hugly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030794 | Hugly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030938 | Barr et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034873 | Zenoni | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039815 | Evans et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042487 | Ossman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043755 | Shimooka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044718 | Ferstl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044727 | Abdelaziz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054630 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054777 | Ackaouy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054780 | Romero | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054807 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064511 | Abdel-Aziz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064512 | Arora et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064568 | Arora et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064817 | Shibayama et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066782 | Nassar | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068676 | Larson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068730 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071147 | Roadknight et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073650 | Nakamura | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073854 | Windl | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073908 | Benejam et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040081148 | Yamada | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083287 | Gao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088347 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088348 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088369 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098391 | Robertson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098424 | Seidenberg | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098447 | Verbeke et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103078 | Smedberg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103305 | Ginter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103339 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103413 | Mandava et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107123 | Haffner | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107273 | Biran et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107281 | Bose et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109428 | Krishnamurthy | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111307 | Demsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111612 | Choi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117610 | Hensley | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117768 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121777 | Schwarz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122970 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128495 | Hensley | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128670 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133620 | Habelha | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133640 | Yeager et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133665 | Deboer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133703 | Habelha | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135780 | Nims | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139202 | Talwar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139464 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141521 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143664 | Usa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148326 | Nadgir | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148390 | Cleary et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150664 | Baudish | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040151181 | Chu | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153563 | Shay et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158637 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162871 | Pabla et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165588 | Pandya | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172464 | Nag | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040179528 | Powers et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181370 | Froehlich et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181476 | Smith et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040189677 | Amann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193674 | Kurosawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194061 | Fujino | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040194098 | Chung et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196308 | Blomquist | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199566 | Carlson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199621 | Lau | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199646 | Susai et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199918 | Skovira | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040203670 | King et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204978 | Rayrole | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205101 | Radhakrishnan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205206 | Naik et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210624 | Andrzejak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210632 | Carlson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210663 | Phillips | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210693 | Zeitler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213395 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215780 | Kawato | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215858 | Armstrong | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215864 | Arimilli et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215991 | McAfee et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216121 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218615 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221038 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236852 | Birkestrand et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243378 | Schnatterly et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243466 | Trzybinski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244006 | Kaufman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246900 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260701 | Lehikoinen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260746 | Brown et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267486 | Percer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267897 | Hill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267901 | Gomez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268035 | Ueno | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268315 | Gouriou | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005200 | Matena | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010465 | Drew et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050010608 | Horikawa | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015378 | Gammel et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015621 | Ashley et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050018604 | Dropps et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050018606 | Dropps et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050018663 | Dropps et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021291 | Retlich | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021371 | Basone et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021606 | Davies et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021728 | Sugimoto | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021759 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021862 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022188 | Tameshige et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027863 | Talwar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027864 | Bozak et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027865 | Bozak et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027870 | Trebes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030954 | Dropps et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033742 | Kamvar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033890 | Lee | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034070 | Meir et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038808 | Kutch | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038835 | Chidambaran et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044195 | Westfall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044205 | Sankaranarayan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044226 | McDermott et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044228 | Birkestrand et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049884 | Hunt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050057 | Mital et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050200 | Mizoguchi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050050270 | Horn et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054354 | Roman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055322 | Masters et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055694 | Lee | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055697 | Buco | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055698 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060360 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060608 | Marchand | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065826 | Baker et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066302 | Kanade | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066358 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071843 | Guo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076145 | Ben-Zvi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077921 | Percer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080845 | Gopinath | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080891 | Cauthron | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080930 | Joseph | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086300 | Yeager et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086356 | Shah | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091505 | Riley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097560 | Rolia et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102396 | Hipp | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102400 | Nakahara | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102683 | Branson | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105538 | Perera et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108407 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108703 | Hellier | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113203 | Mueller et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114478 | Popescu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114551 | Basu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114862 | Bisdikian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120160 | Plouffe et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125213 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125537 | Martins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125538 | Tawil | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131898 | Fatula, Jr. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132378 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132379 | Sankaran et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138618 | Gebhart | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141424 | Lim et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144315 | George et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149940 | Calinescu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154861 | Arimilli et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155033 | Luoffo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156732 | Matsumura | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160137 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160413 | Broussard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160424 | Broussard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163143 | Kalantar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165925 | Dan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169179 | Antal | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172291 | Das et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177600 | Eilam et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187866 | Lee | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188088 | Fellenstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188089 | Lichtenstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188091 | Szabo et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190236 | Ishimoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192771 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193103 | Drabik | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193225 | Macbeth | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193231 | Scheuren | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195075 | McGraw | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197877 | Kaiinoski | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198200 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050202922 | Thomas | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203761 | Barr | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204040 | Ferri et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050206917 | Ferlitsch | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209892 | Miller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210470 | Chung et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213507 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213560 | Duvvury | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222885 | Chen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228852 | Santos et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228856 | Swildens | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228892 | Riley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234846 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235137 | Barr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235150 | Kaler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240688 | Moerman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243867 | Petite | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246705 | Etelson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249341 | Mahone et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256942 | McCardle et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256946 | Childress et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259397 | Bash et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259683 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262495 | Fung et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262508 | Asano et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267948 | Mckinley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268063 | Diao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278392 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278760 | Dewar et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283534 | Bigagli et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283782 | Lu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283822 | Appleby et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288961 | Tabrizi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289540 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002311 | Iwanaga et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060008256 | Khedouri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010445 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060013132 | Garnett et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060013218 | Shore et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015555 | Douglass et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015637 | Chung | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015651 | Freimuth | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015773 | Singh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023245 | Sato et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028991 | Tan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029053 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031379 | Kasriel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031547 | Tsui et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031813 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036743 | Deng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060037016 | Saha et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060039246 | King et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041444 | Flores et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047920 | Moore et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048157 | Dawson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053215 | Sharma | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053216 | Deokar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056291 | Baker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059253 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063690 | Billiauw et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069261 | Chang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069671 | Conley et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069774 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069926 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074925 | Bixby | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074940 | Craft et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088015 | Kakivaya et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089894 | Balk et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090003 | Kakivaya et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090025 | Tufford et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090136 | Miller et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060092942 | Newson | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095917 | Black-Ziegelbein et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060097863 | Horowitz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112184 | Kuo | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060112308 | Crawford | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117208 | Davidson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117317 | Crawford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120322 | Lindskog | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120411 | Basu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060126619 | Teisberg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060126667 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129667 | Anderson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129687 | Goldszmidt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136235 | Keohane et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136570 | Pandya | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136908 | Gebhart et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136928 | Crawford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136929 | Miller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060140211 | Huang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143350 | Miloushev et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149695 | Bossman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153191 | Rajsic et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155740 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155912 | Singh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060156273 | Narayan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159088 | Aghvami et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161466 | Trinon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161585 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165040 | Rathod | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168107 | Balan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168224 | Midgley | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173730 | Birkestrand | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174342 | Zaheer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179241 | Clark et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184939 | Sahoo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189349 | Montulli et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190775 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190975 | Gonzalez | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200773 | Nocera et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206621 | Toebes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208870 | Dousson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212332 | Jackson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212333 | Jackson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212334 | Jackson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212740 | Jackson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218301 | O'Toole et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224725 | Bali et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224740 | Sievers-Tostes | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224741 | Jackson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060227810 | Childress et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229920 | Favorel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230140 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230149 | Jackson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236368 | Raja et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236371 | Fish | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248141 | Mukherjee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248197 | Evans et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248359 | Fung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250971 | Gammenthaler et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251419 | Zadikian et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253570 | Biswas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259734 | Sheu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265508 | Angel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265609 | Fung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268742 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271552 | McChesney et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271928 | Gao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277278 | Hegde | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282505 | Hasha et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282547 | Hasha et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294238 | Naik et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003051 | Kiss et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070006001 | Isobe et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011224 | Mena et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070011302 | Groner et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022425 | Jackson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028244 | Landis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033292 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033533 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070041335 | Znamova et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043591 | Meretei | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044010 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047195 | Merkin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050777 | Hutchinson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061441 | Landis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067366 | Landis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067435 | Landis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067766 | Tal | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076653 | Park et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070081315 | Mondor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083899 | Compton et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088822 | Coile et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094486 | Moore et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094665 | Jackson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094691 | Gazdzinski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109968 | Hussain et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118496 | Bornhoevd | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124344 | Rajakannimariyan et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130397 | Tsu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143824 | Shahbazi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150426 | Asher et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150444 | Chesnais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070155406 | Dowling et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174390 | Silvain et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180310 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180380 | Khavari et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204036 | Mohaban et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209072 | Chen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220520 | Tajima | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226313 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226795 | Conti et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233828 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237115 | Bae | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240162 | Coleman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253017 | Czyszczewski et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260716 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264986 | Warrillow et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266136 | Esfahany et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070268909 | Chen | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271375 | Hwang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280230 | Park | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286009 | Norman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288585 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297350 | Eilam et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299946 | El-Damhougy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299947 | El-Damhougy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299950 | Kulkarni et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080013453 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016198 | Johnston-Watt et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080034082 | McKinney | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040463 | Brown et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052437 | Loffink et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059782 | Kruse et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065835 | Lacobovici | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080075089 | Evans et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082663 | Mouli et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089358 | Basso et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104231 | Dey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080104264 | Duerk et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126523 | Tantrum | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140771 | Vass et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140930 | Hotchkiss | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155070 | El-Damhougy et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155100 | Ahmed et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080159745 | Segal | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162691 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168451 | Challenger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183865 | Appleby et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183882 | Flynn et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080184248 | Barua et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080186965 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080196043 | Feinleib | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199133 | Takizawa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212273 | Bechtolsheim | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212276 | Bottom et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215730 | Sundaram et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216082 | Eilam et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217021 | Lembcke et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222434 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232378 | Moorthy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235443 | Chow et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235702 | Eilam et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080239649 | Bradicich | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243634 | Dworkin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250181 | Li et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255953 | Chang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259555 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259788 | Wang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263131 | Hinni et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263558 | Lin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266793 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270599 | Tamir et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270731 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279167 | Cardei et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288646 | Hasha et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288659 | Hasha et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288660 | Balasubramanian et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288664 | Pettey et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288683 | Ramey | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288873 | McCardle et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080289029 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301226 | Cleary et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301379 | Pong | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301794 | Lee | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080304481 | Gurney | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310848 | Yasuda et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313369 | Verdoorn et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313482 | Karlapalem et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320121 | Altaf et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320161 | Maruccia et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090010153 | Filsfils et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090021907 | Mann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043809 | Fakhouri et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090043888 | Jackson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044036 | Merkin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049443 | Powers et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055542 | Zhoa et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090055691 | Ouksel et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063443 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063690 | Verthein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064287 | Bagepalli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090070771 | Yuyitung et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090080428 | Witkowski et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083390 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089410 | Vicente et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094380 | Qiu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090097200 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100133 | Giulio et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103501 | Farrag et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105059 | Dorry et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113056 | Tameshige et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113130 | He et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090133129 | Jeong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135751 | Hodges et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090135835 | Gallatin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138594 | Fellenstein et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158070 | Gruendler | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172423 | Song et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178132 | Hudis et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182836 | Aviles | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187425 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198958 | Arimilli et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204834 | Hendin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204837 | Raval et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210356 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210495 | Wolfson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216881 | Lovy et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216910 | Duchesneau | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216920 | Lauterbach et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090217329 | Riedl et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090219827 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222884 | Shaji et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225360 | Shirai | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225751 | Koenck et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234917 | Despotovic et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234962 | Strong et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234974 | Arndt et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235104 | Fung | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090238349 | Pezzutti | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240547 | Fellenstein et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248943 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090251867 | Sharma | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090257440 | Yan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259606 | Seah et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259863 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259864 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090265045 | Coxe, III | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271656 | Yokota et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276666 | Haley et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090279518 | Falk et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282274 | Langgood et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282419 | Mejdrich et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285136 | Sun et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287835 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292824 | Marashi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090300608 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313390 | Ahuja et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090316687 | Kruppa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319684 | Kakivaya et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090323691 | Johnson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327079 | Parker et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327489 | Swildens et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100005331 | Somasundaram et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008038 | Coglitore | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008365 | Porat | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026408 | Shau | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036945 | Allibhoy et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100040053 | Gottumukkula et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049822 | Davies et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049931 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051391 | Jahkonen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070675 | Pong | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082788 | Mundy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088205 | Robertson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088490 | Chakradhar | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100091676 | Moran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103837 | Jungck et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106987 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114531 | Korn et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118880 | Kunz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121932 | Joshi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100121947 | Pirzada et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122251 | Karc | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125742 | Ohtani | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125915 | Hall et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131324 | Ferris et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131624 | Ferris | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138481 | Behrens | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100153546 | Clubb et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158005 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161909 | Nation et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100165983 | Aybay et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169477 | Stienhans et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169479 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169888 | Hare et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174604 | Mattingly et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174813 | Hildreth et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198972 | Umbehocker | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198985 | Kanevsky | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217801 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100218194 | Dallman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220732 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100223332 | Maxemchuk et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228848 | Kis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235234 | Shuster | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250914 | Abdul et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262650 | Chauhan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265650 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281166 | Buyya et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281246 | Bristow et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299548 | Chadirchi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100302129 | Kastrup et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100308897 | Evoy et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312910 | Lin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312969 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318665 | Demmer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318812 | Auradkar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325371 | Jagadish et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332262 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333116 | Prahlad | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110023104 | Franklin | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110026397 | Saltsidis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029644 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029652 | Chhuor et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035491 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110055627 | Zawacki et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110058573 | Balakavi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110075369 | Sun et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110082928 | Hasha et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090633 | Rabinovitz | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103391 | Davis | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113083 | Shahar | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110113115 | Chang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119344 | Eustis | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110123014 | Smith | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138046 | Bonnier et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145393 | Ben-Zvi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153953 | Khemani et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154318 | Oshins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154371 | Beale | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167110 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173295 | Bakke et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173612 | El Zur et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179134 | Mayo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185370 | Tamir et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191514 | Wu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191610 | Agarwal et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197012 | Liao et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110210975 | Wong et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213869 | Korsunsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231510 | Korsunsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231564 | Korsunsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238841 | Kakivaya et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238855 | Korsunsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239014 | Karnowski | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110271159 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110273840 | Chen | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274108 | Fan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295991 | Aida | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110296141 | Daffron | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307887 | Huang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110314465 | Smith et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320540 | Oostlander et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320690 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120011500 | Faraboschi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120020207 | Corti et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036237 | Hasha et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120050981 | Xu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054469 | Ikeya et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054511 | Brinks et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120072997 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120081850 | Regimbal et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096211 | Davis et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120099265 | Reber | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120102457 | Tal | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110055 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110180 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110188 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110651 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120117229 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120131201 | Matthews et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120137004 | Smith | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120151476 | Vincent | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120155168 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159116 | Lim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120167083 | Suit | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120167084 | Suit | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120167094 | Suit | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185334 | Sarkar et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191860 | Traversat et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198075 | Crowe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198252 | Kirschtein et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120207165 | Davis | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209989 | Stewart | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120218901 | Jungck et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120222033 | Byrum | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226788 | Jackson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239479 | Amaro et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278378 | Lehane et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278430 | Lehane et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278464 | Lehane et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296974 | Tabe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297042 | Davis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120324005 | Nalawade | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130010639 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130024645 | Cheriton et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031331 | Cheriton et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130036236 | Morales et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130058250 | Casado et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130060839 | Van Biljon et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066940 | Shao | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073602 | Meadway et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073724 | Parashar et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086298 | Alanis | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094499 | Davis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097351 | Davis | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097448 | Davis et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107444 | Schnell | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130111107 | Chang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130124417 | Spears et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130145375 | Kang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130148667 | Hama et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130163605 | Chandra et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130191612 | Li | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130247064 | Jackson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268653 | Deng et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130275703 | Schenfeld et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130286840 | Fan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290643 | Lim | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130290650 | Chang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130298134 | Jackson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130305093 | Jayachandran et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130312006 | Hardman | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318255 | Karino | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130318269 | Dalal et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140052866 | Jackson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082614 | Klein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140104778 | Schnell | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122833 | Davis et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135105 | Quan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143773 | Ciano et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143781 | Yao | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140189039 | Dalton | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201761 | Dalal et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140317292 | Odom | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348182 | Chandra | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359044 | Davis et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140359323 | Fullerton et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140365596 | Kanevsky | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379836 | Zilberboim | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150012679 | Davis et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039840 | Chandra et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150103826 | Davis | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150229586 | Jackson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150293789 | Jackson | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150301880 | Allu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150381521 | Jackson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160154539 | Buddhiraja | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160161909 | Wada | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160306586 | Dornemann | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160378570 | Ljubuncic | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170111274 | Bays | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170115712 | Davis | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170127577 | Rodriguez et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20180018149 | Cook | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180054364 | Jackson | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20190260689 | Jackson | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190286610 | Dalton | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20200073722 | Jackson | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200159449 | Davis et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200379819 | Jackson | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200382585 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210117130 | Davis | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210141671 | Jackson | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210250249 | Jackson | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20210306284 | Jackson | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210311804 | Jackson | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20220121545 | Dalton | Apr 2022 | A1 |
| 20220206859 | Jackson | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220206861 | Jackson | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220214920 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220214921 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220214922 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220222119 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220222120 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220239606 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220239607 | Jackson | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| 20220247694 | Jackson | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| 20220300334 | Jackson | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220317692 | Guim Bernat | Oct 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2496783 | Mar 2004 | CA |
| 60216001 | Jul 2007 | DE |
| 112008001875 | Aug 2013 | DE |
| 0268435 | May 1988 | EP |
| 0605106 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 0859314 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 1331564 | Jul 2003 | EP |
| 1365545 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1492309 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1865684 | Dec 2007 | EP |
| 2391744 | Feb 2004 | GB |
| 2392265 | Feb 2004 | GB |
| 8-212084 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 2002-207712 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2005-165568 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005-223753 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005-536960 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006-309439 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 20040107934 | Dec 2004 | KR |
| M377621 | Apr 2010 | TW |
| 201017430 | May 2010 | TW |
| WO1998011702 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO1998058518 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO1999015999 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO1999057660 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO2000014938 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO2000025485 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO2000060825 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO2001009791 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO2001014987 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO2001015397 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO2001039470 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO2001044271 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO2003046751 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO2003060798 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO2004021109 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004021641 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004046919 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO2004070547 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004092884 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO2005013143 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005017763 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005017783 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005089245 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005091136 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2006036277 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO2006107531 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO2006108187 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO2006112981 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO2008000193 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO2011044271 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO2012037494 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 7,774,482 B1, 08/2010, Szeto et al. (withdrawn) |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,256 dated Jan. 12, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/171,152 dated Dec. 21, 2022. |
| Advisory Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,368 dated Jan. 13, 2023. |
| Advisory Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,403 dated Jan. 13, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,159 dated Jan. 13, 2023. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/279,007, filed Apr. 2006, Jackson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, filed Apr. 2012, Davis et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/899,751, filed May 2013, Chandra. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/935,108, filed Jul. 2013, Davis. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,428, filed Aug. 2013, Chandra. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/662,240, filed Mar. 2005, Jackson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/552,653, filed Apr. 2005, Jackson. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,577, dated Oct. 15, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 10/530,577, dated May 29, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,438 dated Jan. 3, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,438 dated Aug. 31, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,438 dated Mar. 15, 2010. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852 dated Nov. 26, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Feb. 10, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Jan. 16, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Jun. 26, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Mar. 4, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Mar. 5, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Oct. 4, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Oct. 5, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,852, dated Oct. 16, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Apr. 4, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Aug. 7, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Dec. 28, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Dec. 8, 2008. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Jul. 12, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated May 26, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Nov. 23, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,853, dated Oct. 16, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Apr. 18, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Aug. 1, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Jun. 10, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Jun. 5, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Jun. 8, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Nov. 26, 2008. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,854, dated Oct. 27, 2010. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
| Office Action issued on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Jul. 22, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Aug. 13, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Dec. 30, 2008. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Dec. 31, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Dec. 7, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Jan. 26, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Jul. 22, 2010. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,855, dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,156, dated Mar. 25, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,156, dated Jan. 18, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,156, dated Oct. 13, 2011. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/616,156, dated Sep. 17, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 11/718,867 dated May 25, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/718,867 dated Dec. 29, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/718,867 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/718,867 dated Jul. 11, 2008. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 11/718,867 dated Jun. 15, 2009. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Jul. 20, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Aug. 13, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Mar. 1, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Nov. 21, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,967, dated Oct. 10, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,996, dated Jun. 19, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/794,996, dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721 dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated Apr. 17, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated Feb. 24, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated Jul. 2, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated May 22, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated Oct. 11, 2012. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,721, dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054, dated Sep. 19, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054 dated May 31, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054 dated Oct. 20, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054, dated Apr. 16, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054, dated Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054, dated Jan. 26, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,054, dated Oct. 23, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,855, dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,855, dated Dec. 19, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,086, dated Jul. 18, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,086, dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,713, dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,713, dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,713, dated Oct. 17, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,722, dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,722, dated Jan. 17, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/475,722, dated Oct. 20, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,498, dated Feb. 23, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,498, dated May 8, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,498, dated Nov. 17, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,505, dated Mar. 6, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,505, dated Dec. 5, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/527,505, dated May 8, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,987 dated Jun. 4, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,987 dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,987 dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725, dated Mar. 30, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725 dated Mar. 10, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725, dated Apr. 23, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725, dated Jan. 10, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725, dated Nov. 4, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,725, dated Nov. 13, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,731, dated Mar. 5, 2015. |
| Office action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,731 dated Jan. 29, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,731, dated Jul. 25, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/624,731, dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,759 dated May 10, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,759, dated Feb. 22, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,759, dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,741 dated Dec. 4, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,741, dated Jul. 1, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,741, dated Mar. 11, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,741, dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,286 dated Feb. 24, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,286, dated May 13, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, dated Dec. 3, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, dated Mar. 16, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, dated Aug. 2, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, dated Mar. 12, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,340, dated Mar. 29, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,386, dated Jan. 24, 2014. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,386, dated May 13, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,414, dated Nov. 4, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,414, dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,414, dated Aug. 9, 2013. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,428, dated Jul. 10, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,308 dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,308, dated May 14, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,362, dated Feb. 21, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,428 dated Jul. 18, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,428 dated May 6, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/728,428, dated Jun. 12, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/758,164, dated Apr. 15, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Feb. 26, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Jan. 9, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Aug. 30, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Jan. 23, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Jun. 15, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Mar. 15, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600 dated Oct. 19, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/760,600, dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Oct. 27, 2020. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Sep. 14, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Jan. 13, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Jul. 6, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Jun. 27, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Mar. 30, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 13/855,241, dated Sep. 15, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,723 dated Feb. 8, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,723, dated Dec. 3, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,723, dated May 1, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,254 dated May 25, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,254 dated Aug. 12, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,254 dated Feb. 15, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,254, dated May 2, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,697 dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,697 dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,697, dated Aug. 17, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,698, dated Aug. 19, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,698, dated Feb. 12, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated Aug. 12, 2021 and Jul. 16, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated Feb. 4, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated Jun. 25, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated May 31, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated May 6, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated Oct. 6, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,921 dated Oct. 8, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Jan. 30, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Aug. 10, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Jan. 25, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Jun. 3, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Jun. 9, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/137,940 dated Nov. 3, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912 dated Apr. 25, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated Apr. 3, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated Feb. 7, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated Dec. 7, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated Jul. 20, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated May 8, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,912, dated Oct. 11, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/331,718 dated Jun. 7, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/331,718 dated Feb. 28, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/331,772, dated Jan. 10, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/331,772, dated Aug. 11, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,178 dated Aug. 19, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,178 dated Jun. 8, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,178 dated Dec. 18, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,931 dated May 20, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,931 dated Dec. 11, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,931, dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,931, dated Jul. 9, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/454,049, dated Jan. 20, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,102, dated Jan. 22, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/590,102, dated Aug. 15, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120 dated Mar. 10, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120 dated Mar. 30, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120 dated Oct. 3, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120 dated Oct. 20, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120 dated Sep. 29, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Aug. 27, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Feb. 12, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Mar. 2, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Mar. 22, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Sep. 13, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Sep. 8, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Nov. 18, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/412,832, dated Oct. 14, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/704,231, dated Sep. 2, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642 dated Mar. 19, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642, dated May 9, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642 dated Feb. 7, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642 dated Feb. 17, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642 dated Jul. 12, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,642 dated Sep. 12, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,543 dated Jul. 21, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,543 dated Apr. 7, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,529 dated Aug. 9, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,529 dated Oct. 3, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,529, dated Jun. 6, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,529, dated Nov. 14, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,948 dated Jun. 14, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,948 dated Nov. 4, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/791,873 dated Dec. 20, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/791,873 dated May 14, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/809,723 dated Jan. 11, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/809,723 dated Aug. 25, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/809,723 dated Dec. 30, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated Apr. 25, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated Jan. 21, 2022 and Dec. 9, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated Jan. 19, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated Jan. 31, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated May 16, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated May 16, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927 dated Sep. 9, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927, dated Aug. 28, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,927, dated Jan. 31, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/833,673, dated Dec. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/833,673, dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/833,673, dated Jun. 10, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/833,673, dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/842,916 dated Oct. 2, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/842,916 dated May 5, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,645 dated Oct. 13, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,645 dated Feb. 16, 2016. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,645 dated Jun. 29, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated Feb. 14, 2020. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated Jul. 8, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated Nov. 7, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated Jan. 31, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated May 11, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,059, dated Oct. 11, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/042,489 dated Jul. 16, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/042,489 dated Jan. 9, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,542 dated Feb. 28, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,542 dated Jan. 4, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/078,115 dated Jan. 8, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/078,115 dated Sep. 5, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,111 dated Nov. 13, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,111 dated Sep. 1, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/254,111 dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/270,418 dated Nov. 2, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/270,418 dated Apr. 21, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,462 dated Apr. 6, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,462 dated Dec. 15, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,462 dated Feb. 10, 2017. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,462 dated Jun. 13, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Feb. 2, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Aug. 24, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Aug. 9, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Jan. 31, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Jul. 11, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Mar. 20, 2020. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/345,017 dated Nov. 29, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/357,332 dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/357,332 dated May 9, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/357,332 dated Nov. 9, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/360,668, dated May 5, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/430,959 dated Mar. 15, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,467 dated May 30, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,467, dated Jan. 11, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,467, dated Jul. 13, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/672,418 dated Apr. 4, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,392 dated Mar. 22, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,392 dated Dec. 3, 2018. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,392 dated Jul. 5, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 15/726,509, dated Sep. 25, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/726,509, dated Jun. 3, 2019. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,256 dated Dec. 23, 2021. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,256 dated Jul. 7, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,708 dated Aug. 24, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,708 dated Jun. 7, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,745, dated Jun. 9, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,745 dated Jan. 13, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,745, dated Sep. 27, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/088,954, dated Sep. 13, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/089,207, dated Jul. 7, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/089,207 dated Jan. 28, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/089,207, dated Oct. 31, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/171,152 dated Aug. 16, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,231 dated Oct. 5, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,245 dated Mar. 18, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,245 dated Sep. 14, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,245, dated Sep. 22, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,235 dated May 25, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,235 dated Sep. 20, 2022. |
| Advisory Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,235 dated Dec. 5, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,368 dated Jun. 7, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,368 dated Oct. 18, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,403 dated Jun. 7, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,403 dated Oct. 18, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,767 dated Jun. 27, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,767 dated Jul. 11 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,767 dated Oct. 14 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,808, dated May 26, 2022 and Jun. 6, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,808, dated Sep. 14, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,808, dated Sep. 26, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,847, dated Jul. 7, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/700,847, dated Oct. 26, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,214, dated Jul. 8, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,214, dated Nov. 16, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,242, dated Jul. 28, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,242, dated Dec. 12, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,037, dated Jul. 18, 2022. |
| Office Acton on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,037 dated Jun. 13, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,037, dated Oct. 27, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,062 dated Jun. 15, 2022. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,062 dated Oct. 7, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,076 dated Jun. 22, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No.17/722,076, dated Nov. 28, 2022. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,159 dated Aug. 31, 2022. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/552,653, filed Apr. 19, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/662,240, filed Mar. 16, 2005, Jackson. |
| Extended European Search Report for EP 10827330.1, dated Jun. 5, 2013. |
| Search Report on EP Application 10827330.1, dated Feb. 12, 2015. |
| Reexamination Report on Japanese Application 2012-536877, dated Jan. 22, 2015, including English Translation. |
| PCT/US2005/008296—International Search Report dated Aug. 3, 2005 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/008296, 1 page. |
| PCT/US2005/008297—International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2005/008297, dated Sep. 29, 2005. |
| PCT/US2005/040669—International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US2005/040669, dated Apr. 29, 2008. |
| PCT/US2005/040669—Written Opinion for PCT/US2005/040669, dated Sep. 13, 2006. |
| PCT/US2009/044200—International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2009/044200, dated Nov. 17, 2010. |
| PCT/US2009/044200—International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2009/044200, dated Jul. 1, 2009. |
| PCT/US2010/053227—International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2010/053227, dated May 10, 2012. |
| PCT/US2010/053227—International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/053227, dated Dec. 16, 2010. |
| PCT/US2011/051996—International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/051996, dated Jan. 19, 2012. |
| PCT/US2012/038986—International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/038986 dated Nov. 26, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/038986—International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2012/038986, dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/038987—International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/038987, dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
| PCT/US2012/061747—International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/061747, dated Apr. 29, 2014. |
| PCT/US2012/061747—International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/061747, dated Mar. 1, 2013. |
| PCT/US2012/062608—International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on PCT/US2012/062608, dated May 6, 2014. |
| PCT/US2012/062608—International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/062608, dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
| Office Action on Taiwan Application 101139729, dated May 25, 2015 (English translation not available). |
| “Microsoft Computer Dictionary, 5th Ed.”; Microsoft Press; 3 pages; 2002. |
| “Random House Concise Dictionary of Science & Computers”; 3 pages; Helicon Publishing; 2004. |
| A Language Modeling Framework for Resource Selection and Results Merging Si et al. CIKM 2002, Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Iformation and Knowledge Management. |
| Abdelwahed, Sherif et al., “A Control-Based Framework for Self-Managing Distributed Computing Systems”, WOSS'04 Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2004 Newport Beach, CA, USA. Copyright 2004 ACM 1-58113-989-6/04/0010. |
| Abdelzaher, Tarek, et al., “Performance Guarantees for Web Server End-Systems: A Control-Theoretical Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 2002. |
| Advanced Switching Technology Tech Brief, published 2005, 2 pages. |
| Alhusaini et al. “A framework for mapping with resource co-allocation in heterogeneous computing systems,” Proceedings 9th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW 2000) (Cat. No. PR00556), Cancun, Mexico, 2000, pp. 273-286. (Year: 2000). |
| Ali et al., “Task Execution Time Modeling for Heterogeneous Computing System”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 1-15. |
| Amini, A. Shaikh, and H. Schulzrinne, “Effective Peering for Multi-provider Content Delivery Services”, In Proceedings of 23.sup.rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM'04), pp. 850-861, 2004. |
| Amir and D. Shaw, “WALRUS—A Low Latency, High Throughput Web Service Using Internet-wide Replication”, In Proceedings of the 19.sup.th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshop, 1998. |
| Amiri et al., “Dynamic Function Placement for Data-Intensive Cluster Computing,” Jun. 2000. |
| Appleby, K., et al., “Oceano-SLA Based Management of a Computing Utility”, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O.Box 704, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA. Proc. 7th IFIP/IEEE Int'l Symp. Integrated Network Management, IEEE Press 2001. |
| Aweya, James et al., “An adaptive load balancing scheme for web servers”, International Journal of Network Management 2002; 12: 3-39 (DOI: 10.1002/nem.421), Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| Azuma, T. Okamoto, G. Hasegawa, and M. Murata, “Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Resource Management System for Internet Servers”, IOS Press, Journal of High Speed Networks, vol. 14 Issue 4, pp. 301-316, Oct. 2005. |
| Bader et al.; “Applications”; The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 15, No. ; pp. 181-185; Summer 2001. |
| Baentsch, Michael et al., “World Wide Web Caching: The Application-Level View of the Internet”, Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 170-178, Jun. 1997. |
| Banga, Gaurav et al., “Resource Containers: A New Facility for Resource Management in Server Systems”, Rice University, originally published in the Proceedings of the 3.sup.rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, New Orleans, Louisiana, Feb. 1999. |
| Banicescu et al., “Competitive Resource management in Distributed Computing Environments with Hectiling”, 1999, High Performance Computing Symposium, p. 1-7 (Year: 1999). |
| Banicescu et al., “Efficient Resource Management for Scientific Applications in Distributed Computing Environment” 1998, Mississippi State Univ. Dept. of Comp. Science, p. 45-54. (Year: 1998). |
| Belloum, A. et al., “A Scalable Web Server Architecture”, World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems, 5, 5-23, 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in the Netherlands. 2000. |
| Benkner, Siegfried, et al., “VGE—A Service-Oriented Grid Environment for On-Demand Supercomputing”, Institute for Software Science, University of Vienna, Nordbergstrasse 15/C/3, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing. pp. 11-18. 2004. |
| Bent, Leeann et al., “Characterization of a Large Web Site Population with Implications for Content Delivery”, WWW2004, May 17-22, 2004, New York, New York, USA ACM 1-58113-844-X/04/0005, pp. 522-533. |
| Bian, Qiyong, et al., “Dynamic Flow Switching, A New Communication Service for ATM Networks”, 1997. |
| Bradford, S. Milliner, and M. Dumas, “Experience Using a Coordination-based Architecture for Adaptive Web Content Provision”, In Coordination, pp. 140-156. Springer, 2005. |
| Braumandl, R. et al., “ObjectGlobe: Ubiquitous query processing on the Internet”, Universitat Passau, Lehrstuhl fur Informatik, 94030 Passau, Germany. Technische Universitaat Muunchen, Institut fur Informatik, 81667 Munchen, Germany. Edited by F. Casati, M.-C. Shan, D. Georgakopoulos. Published online Jun. 7, 2001—.sub.—cSpringer-Verlag 2001. |
| Buyya et al., “An Evaluation of Economy-based Resource Trading and Scheduling on Computational Power Grids for Parameter Sweep Applications,” Active Middleware Services, 2000, 10 pages. |
| Caesar et al., “Design and Implementation of a Routing Control Platform,” Usenix, NSDI '05 Paper, Technical Program , obtained from the Internet, on Apr. 13, 2021, at URL <https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/nsdi05/tech/full_papers/caesar/ca-esar_html/>, 23 pages. |
| Cardellini, Valeria et al., “Geographic Load Balancing for Scalable Distributed Web Systems”, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, pp. 20-27. 2000. |
| Cardellini, Valeria et al., “The State of the Art in Locally Distributed Web-Server Systems”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, No. 2, Jun. 2002, pp. 263-311. |
| Casalicchio, Emiliano, et al., “Static and Dynamic Scheduling Algorithms for Scalable Web Server Farm”, University of Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy, 00133.2001. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9.sup.th Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing, pp. 369-376, 2001. |
| Chandra, Abhishek et al., “Dynamic Resource Allocation for Shared Data Centers Using Online Measurements” Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Quality of service, Berkeley, CA, USA pp. 381-398. 2003. |
| Chandra, Abhishek et al., “Quantifying the Benefits of Resource Multiplexing in On-Demand Data Centers”, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2003. |
| Chapter 1 Overview of the Origin Family Architecture from Origin and Onyx2 Theory of Operations Manual, published 1997, 18 pages. |
| Chase et al., “Dynamic Virtual Clusters in a Grid Site Manager”, Proceedings of the 12.sup.th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC'03), 2003. |
| Chawla, Hamesh et al., “HydraNet: Network Support for Scaling of Large-Scale Services”,Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 1998. Oct. 1998. |
| Chellappa, Ramnath et al., “Managing Computing Resources in Active Intranets”, International Journal of Network Management, 2002, 12:117-128 (D0I:10.1002/nem.427). |
| Chen and G. Agrawal, “Resource Allocation in a Middleware for Streaming Data”, in Proceedings of the 2.sup.nd Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing (MGC '04), pp. 5-10, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 2004. |
| Chen et al., “A flexible service model for advance reservation”, Computer Networks, Elsevier science publishers, vol. 37, No. 3-4, pp. 251-262. Nov. 5, 2001. |
| Chen, et al., “Replicated Servers Allocation for Multiple Information Sources in a Distributed Environment”, Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Sep. 2000. |
| Chen, Thomas, “Increasing the Observability of Internet Behavior”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 93-98, Jan. 2001. |
| Chen, Xiangping et al., “Performance Evaluation of Service Differentiating Internet Servers”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 51, No. 11, pp. 1368-1375, Nov. 2002. |
| Cisco MDS 9000 Family Multiprotocol Services Module, published 2006, 13 pages. |
| Clark, et al., “Providing Scalable Web Service Using Multicast Delivery”, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0280, 1995. |
| Clarke and G. Coulson, “An Architecture for Dynamically Extensible Operating Systems”, In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems (ICCDS'98), Annapolis, MD, May 1998. |
| Colajanni, Michele et al., “Analysis of Task Assignment Policies in Scalable Distributed Web-server Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systes, vol. 9, No. 6, Jun. 1998. |
| Colajanni, P. Yu, V. Cardellini, M. Papazoglou, M. Takizawa, B. Cramer and S. Chanson, “Dynamic Load Balancing in Geographically Distributed Heterogeneous Web Servers”, In Proceedings of the 18.sup.th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 295-302, May 1998. |
| Comparing the I2C Bus to the SMBUS, Maxim Integrated, Dec. 1, 2000, p. 1. |
| Conti, Marco et al., “Quality of Service Issues in Internet Web Services”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 593-594, Jun. 2002. |
| Conti, Marco, et al., “Client-side content delivery policies in replicated web services: parallel access versus single server approach”, Istituto di Informatica e Telematica (IIT), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via G. Moruzzi, I. 56124 Pisa, Italy, Performance Evaluation 59 (2005) 137-157, Available online Sep. 11, 2004. |
| Coomer et al.; “Introduction to the Cluster Grid—Part 1”; Sun Microsystems White Paper; 19 pages; Aug. 2002. |
| Das et al., “Unifying Packet and Circuit Switched Networks,” IEEE Globecom Workshops 2009, Nov. 30, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
| Deering, “IP Multicast Extensions for 4.3BSD UNIX and related Systems,” Jun. 1999, 5 pages. |
| Devarakonda, V.K. Naik, N. Rajamanim, “Policy-based multi-datacenter resource management”, In 6.sup.th IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, pp. 247-250, Jun. 2005. |
| Dilley, John, et al., “Globally Distributed Content Delivery”, IEEE Internet Computing, 1089-7801/02/$17.00 .COPYRGT. 2002 IEEE, pp. 50-58, Sep.-Oct. 2002. |
| Doyle, J. Chase, O. Asad, W. Jin, and A. Vahdat, “Model-Based Resource Provisioning in a Web Service Utility”, In Proceedings of the Fourth USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), Mar. 2003. |
| Edited by William Gropp, Ewing Lusk and Thomas Sterling, “Beowulf Cluster Computing with Linux,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003. |
| Elghany et al., “High Throughput High Performance NoC Switch,” NORCHIP 2008, Nov. 2008, pp. 237-240. |
| Ercetin, Ozgur et al., “Market-Based Resource Allocation for Content Delivery in the Internet”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 52, No. 12, pp. 1573-1585, Dec. 2003. |
| Exhibit 1002, Declaration of Dr. Andrew Wolfe, Ph.D., document filed on behalf of Unified Patents, LLC, in Case No. IPR2022-00136, 110 pages, Declaration dated Nov. 29, 2021. |
| Exhibit 1008, Declaration of Kevin Jakel, document filed on behalf of Unified Patents, LLC, in Case No. IPR2022-00136, 7 pages, Declaration dated Nov. 4, 2021. |
| Fan, Li, et al., “Summary Cache: A Scalable Wide-Area Web Cache Sharing Protoccl”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking, vol. 8, No. 3, Jun. 2000. |
| Feldmann, Anja, et al., “Efficient Policies for Carrying Web Traffic Over Flow-Switched Networks”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 6, No. 6, Dec. 1998. |
| Feldmann, Anja, et al., “Reducing Overhead in Flow-Switched Networks: An Empirical Study of Web Traffic”, AT&T Labs—Research, Florham Park, NJ, 1998. |
| Fong, L.L. et al., “Dynamic Resource Management in an eUtiIity”, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 0-7803-7382-0/02/$17.00 .COPYRGT. 2002 IEEE. |
| Foster et al., “A Distributed Resource Management Architecture that Supports Advance Reservations and Co-Allocation,” Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS '99), 1999, pp. 27-36. |
| Foster, Ian et al., “The Anatomy of the Grid-Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations”, To appear: Intl J. Supercomputer Applications, 2001. |
| Fox, Armando et al., “Cluster-Based Scalable Network Services”, University of California at Berkeley, SOSP—Oct. 16, 1997 Saint-Malo, France, ACM 1997. |
| fpga4fun.com,“What is JTAG?”, 2 pages, Jan. 31, 2010. |
| From AT to BTX: Motherboard Form Factor, Webopedia, Apr. 29, 2005, p. 1. |
| Furmento et al. “An Integrated Grid Environment for Component Applications”, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Grid Computing table of contents, 2001, pp. 26-37. |
| Furmento et al., “Building computational communities from federated resources.” European Conference on Parallel, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 855-863. (Year: 2001). |
| Garg, Rahul, et al., “A SLA Framework for QoS Provisioning and Dynamic Capacity Allocation”, 2002. |
| Gayek, P., et al., “A Web Content Serving Utility”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 43-63. 2004. |
| Genova, Zornitza et al., “Challenges in URL Switching for Implementing Globally Distributed Web Sites”, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. 0/7695-077 I-9/00 $10.00—IEEE. 2000. |
| Grajcar, Martin, “Genetic List Scheduling Algorithm for Scheduling and Allocation on a Loosely Coupled Heterogeneous Multiprocessor System”, Proceedings of the 36.sup.th annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 280-285. 1999. |
| Grecu et al., “A Scalable Communication-Centric SoC Interconnect Architecture” Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, 2005, pp. 343, 348 (full article included). |
| Grimm, Robert et al., “System Support for Pervasive Applications”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 22, No. 4, Nov. 2004, pp. 421-486. |
| Guo, L. Bhuyan, R. Kumar and S. Basu, “QoS Aware Job Scheduling in a Cluster-Based Web Server for Multimedia Applications”, In Proceedings of the 19.sup.th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'05), Apr. 2005. |
| Gupta, A., Kleinberg, J., Kumar, A., Rastogi, R. & Yener, B. “Provisioning a virtual private network: a network design problem for multicommodity flow,” Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing [online], Jul. 2001, pp. 389-398, abstract [retrieved on Jun. 14, 2007].Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=380830&dl=ACM&col—=Guide>. |
| Haddad and E. Paquin, “MOSIX: A Cluster Load-Balancing Solution for Linux”, In Linux Journal, vol. 2001 Issue 85es, Article No. 6, May 2001. |
| Hadjiefthymiades, Stathes et al., “Using Proxy Cache Relocation to Accelerate Web Browsing in Wireless/Mobile Communications”, University of Athens, Dept. of Informatics and Telecommunications, Panepistimioupolis, Ilisia, Athens, 15784, Greece. WWW10, May 1-5, 2001, Hong Kong. |
| He XiaoShan; QoS Guided Min-Min Heuristic for Grid Task Scheduling; Jul. 2003, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 442-451 J. Comput. Sci. & Technol. |
| He XiaoShan; QoS Guided Min-Min Heuristic for Grud Task Scheduling; Jul. 2003, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 442-451 J. Comput. Sci. & Technol. |
| Hossain et al., “Extended Butterfly Fat Tree Interconnection (EFTI) Architecture for Network on CHIP,” 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communicatinos, Computers and Signal Processing, Aug. 2005, pp. 613-616. |
| HP “OpenView OS Manager using Radia software”, 5982-7478EN, Rev 1, Nov. 2005; (HP_Nov_2005.pdf; pp. 1-4). |
| HP ProLiant SL6500 Scalable System, Family data sheet, HP Technical sheet, Sep. 2010 4 pages. |
| HP Virtual Connect Traffic Flow—Technology brief, Jan. 2012, 22 pages. |
| Hu, E.C. et al., “Adaptive Fast Path Architecture”, Copyright 2001 by International Business Machines Corporation, pp. 191-206, IBM J. Res. & Dev. vol. 45 No. 2 Mar. 2001. |
| Huang, S. Sebastine and T. Abdelzaher, “An Architecture for Real-Time Active Content Distribution”, In Proceedings of the 16.sup.th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 04), pp. 271-280, 2004. |
| Huy Tuong Le, “The Data-AWare Resource Broker” Research Project Thesis, University of Adelaide, Nov. 2003, pp. 1-63. |
| IBM Tivoli “IBM Directory Integrator and Tivoli Identity Manager Integration” Apr. 2, 2003, pp. 1-13 online link “http:publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/ITIM/SC32-1683-00/en_US/HTML/idi_integration/index.html” (Year: 2003). |
| IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler job Scheduling Console User's Guide Feature Level 1.2 (Maintenance Release Oct. 2003). Oct. 2003, IBM Corporation, http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TWS/SH19-4552-01/en.sub.—US/PDF/-jsc.sub.—user.pdf. |
| Intel, Architecture Guide: Intel® Active Management Technology, Intel.com, Oct. 10, 2008, pp. 1-23, (Year 2008). |
| IQSearchText-202206090108.txt, publication dated Apr. 6, 2005, 2 pages. |
| J. Chase, D. Irwin, L. Grit, J. Moore and S. Sprenkle, “Dynamic Virtual Clusters in a Grid Site Manager”, In Proceedings of the 12.sup.th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 90-100, 2003. |
| Jackson et al., “Grid Computing: Beyond Enablement”,; Cluster Resource, Inc., Jan. 21, 2005. |
| Jann, Joefon et al., “Web Applications and Dynamic Reconfiguration in UNIX Servers”, IBM, Thomos J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown' Heights, New York 10598, 0-7803-7756-7/03/$17.00. 2003 IEEE. pp. 186-194. |
| Jansen et al., “SATA-IO to Develop Specification for Mini Interface Connector” Press Release Sep. 21, 2009, Serial ATA3 pages. |
| Jarek Nabrzyski, Jennifer M. Schopf and Jan Weglarz, “Grid Resources Management, State of the Art and Future Trends,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. |
| Jiang, Xuxian et al., “SODA: a Service-On-Demand Architecture for Application Service Hosting Utility Platforms”, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC'03) 1082-8907/03 $17.00 .COPYRGT. 2003 IEEE. |
| Joseph et al.; “Evolution of grid computing architecture and grid adoption models”; IBM Systems Journal, vol. 43, No. 4; 22 pages; 2004. |
| Kafil et al., “Optimal Task Assignment in Herterogenous Computing Systems,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 135-146. |
| Kant, Krishna et al., “Server Capacity Planning for Web Traffic Workload”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1999, pp. 731-474. |
| Kapitza, F. J. Hauck, and H. P. Reiser, “Decentralized, Adaptive Services: The AspectIX Approach for a Flexible and Secure Grid Environment”, In Proceedings of the Grid Services Engineering and Management Conferences (GSEM, Erfurt, Germany, Nov. 2004), pp. 107-118, LNCS 3270, Springer, 2004. |
| Kavas et al., “Comparing Windows NT, Linux, and QNX as the Basis for Cluster Systems”, Concurrency and Computation Practice & Experience Wiley UK, vol. 13, No. 15, pp. 1303-1332, Dec. 25, 2001. |
| Koulopoulos, D. et al., “PLEIADES: An Internet-based parallel/distributed system”, Software—Practice and Experience 2002; 32:1035-1049 (DOI: 10.1002/spe.468). |
| Kuan-Wei Cheng, Chao-Tung Yang, Chuan-Lin Lai and Shun-Chyi Change, “A parallel loop self-scheduling on grid computing environments,” 7th International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Networks, 2004. Proceedings. 2004, pp. 409-414 (Year: 2004). |
| Kuz, Ihor et al., “A Distributed-Object Infrastructure for Corporate Websites”, Delft University of Technology Vrije Universiteit Vrije Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands, 0-7695-0819-7/00 $10.00 0 2000 IEEE. |
| Lars C. Wolf et al. “Concepts for Resource Reservation in Advance” Multimedia Tools and Applications. [Online] 1997, pp. 255-278, XP009102070 The Netherlands Retreived from the Internet: URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h25481221mu22451/fulltext.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 23, 2008]. |
| Leinberger, W. et al., “Gang Scheduling for Distributed Memory Systems”, University of Minnesota—Computer Science and Engineering—Technical Report, Feb. 16, 2000, vol. TR 00-014. |
| Liao, Raymond, et al., “Dynamic Core Provisioning for Quantitative Differentiated Services”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 429-442, Jun. 2004. |
| Liu et al. “Design and Evaluation of a Resouce Selection Framework for Grid Applicaitons” High Performance Distributed Computing. 2002. HPDC-11 2002. Proceeding S. 11.sup.th IEEE International Symposium on Jul. 23-26, 2002, Piscataway, NJ, USA IEEE, Jul. 23, 2002, pp. 63-72, XP010601162 ISBN: 978-0-7695-1686-8. |
| Liu, Simon: “Securing the Clouds: Methodologies and Practices.” Encyclopedia of Cloud Comguting (2016): 220. (Year: 2016). |
| Lowell, David et al., “Devirtualizable Virtual Machines Enabling General, Single-Node, Online Maintenance”, ASPLOS'04, Oct. 9-13, 2004, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. pp. 211-223, Cogxright 2004 ACM. |
| Lu, Chenyang et al., “A Feedback Control Approach for Guaranteeing Relative Delays in Web Servers”, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, 0-7695-1134-1/01 $10.00.2001 IEEE. |
| Luo Si et al. “A Language Modeling Framework for Resource Selection and Results Merging”, Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2002 ACM pp. 391-397. |
| Maheswaran et al., “Dynamic Matching and Scheduling of a Class of Independent Tasks onto Heterogeneous Computing Systems,” IEEE, 2000, pp. 1-15. |
| Mahon, Rob et al., “Cooperative Design in Grid Services”, The 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design Proceedings. pp. 406-412. IEEE 2003. |
| Mateescu et al., “Quality of service on the grid via metascheduling with resource co-scheduling and co-reservation,” The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 2003, 10 pages. |
| McCann, Julie, et al., “Patia: Adaptive Distributed Webserver (A Position Paper)”, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, SW1 2BZ, UK. 2003. |
| Montez, Carlos et al., “Implementing Quality of Service in Web Servers”, LCMI—Depto de Automacao e Sistemas—Univ. Fed. de Santa Catarina, Caixa Postal 476-88040-900—Florianopolis—SC—Brasil, 1060-9857/02 $17.00. 2002 IEEE. |
| Naik, S. Sivasubramanian and S. Krishnan, “Adaptive Resource Sharing in a Web Services Environment”, In Proceedings of the 5.sup.th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware (Middleware '04), pp. 311-330, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. New York, NY, USA, 2004. |
| Nakrani and C. Tovey, “On Honey Bees and Dynamic Server Allocation in Internet Hosting Centers”, Adaptive Behavior, vol. 12, No. 3-4, pp. 223-240, Dec. 2004. |
| Nawathe et al., “Implementation of an 8-Core, 64-Thread, Power Efficient SPARC Server on a Chip”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 6-20. |
| Pacifici, Giovanni et al., “Performance Management for Cluster Based Web Services”, IBM TJ Watson Research Center, May 13, 2003. |
| Pande et al., “Design of a Switch for Network on Chip Applications,” May 25-28, 2003 Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 5, pp. V217-V220. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,271,980, Challenging Claims 1-5 and 14-15, document filed on behalf of Unified Patents, LLC, in Case No. IPR2022-00136, 92 pages, Petition document dated Nov. 29, 2021. |
| Ranjan, J. Rolia, H. Fu, and E. Knightly, “QoS-driven Server Migration for Internet Data Centers”, In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS 2002), May 2002. |
| Rashid, Mohammad, et al., “An Analytical Approach to Providing Controllable Differentiated Quality of Service in Web Servers”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1022-1033, Nov. 2005. |
| Raunak, Mohammad et al., “Implications of Proxy Caching for Provisioning Networks and Servers”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 1276-1289, Sep. 2002. |
| Reed, Daniel et al., “The Next Frontier: Interactive and Closed Loop Performance Steering”, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshop, 1996. |
| Reumann, John et al., “Virtual Services: A New Abstraction for Server Consolidation”, Proceedings of 2000 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, San Diego, California, Jun. 18-23, 2000. |
| Roblitz et al., “Resource Reservations with Fuzzy Requests”, Con-currency and computation: Practice and Experience, 2005. |
| Rolia, S. Singhal, and R. Friedrich, “Adaptive Internet data centers”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for Electronic Business, Science, and Education on the Internet (SSGRR '00), Jul. 2000. |
| Rolia, X. Zhu, and M. Arlitt, “Resource Access Management for a Utility Hosting Enterprise Applications”, In Proceedings of the 8th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), pp. 549-562, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA, Mar. 2003. |
| Roy, Alain, “Advance Reservation API”, University of Wisconsin-Madison, GFD-E.5, Scheduling Working Group, May 23, 2002. |
| Ryu, Kyung Dong et al., “Resource Policing to Support Fine-Grain Cycle Stealing in Networks of Workstations”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 878-892, Oct. 2004. |
| Sacks, Lionel et al., “Active Robust Resource Management in Cluster Computing Using Policies”, Journal of Network and Systems Management, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 329-350, Sep. 2003. |
| Shaikh, Anees et al., “Implementation of a Service Platform for Online Games”, Network Software and Services, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY 10532, SIGCOMM'04 Workshops, Aug. 30 & Sep. 3, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA. Copyright 2004 ACM. |
| Shen, H. Tang, T. Yang, and L. Chu, “Integrated Resource Management for Cluster-based Internet Services”, In Proceedings of the 5.sup.th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '02), pp. 225-238, Dec. 2002. |
| Shen, L. Chu, and T. Yang, “Supporting Cluster-based Network Services on Functionally Symmetric Software Architecture”, In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2004 Conference, Nov. 2004. |
| Si et al., “Language Modeling Framework for Resource Selection and Results Merging”, SIKM 2002, Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and Knowledge Management. |
| Sit, Yiu-Fai et al., “Cyclone: A High-Performance Cluster-Based Web Server with Socket Cloning”, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, The University of Hong Kong, Cluster Computing vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 21-37, Jul. 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
| Sit, Yiu-Fai et al., “Socket Cloning for Cluster-BasedWeb Servers”, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, The University of Hong Kong, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, IEEE 2002. |
| Smith et al.; “Grid computing”; MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 46, Iss. 1.; 5 pages; Fall 2004. |
| Snell et al., “The Performance Impact of Advance Reservation Meta-Scheduling”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000, pp. 137-153. |
| Snell, Quinn et al., “An Enterprise-Based Grid Resource Management System”, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, 2002. |
| Soldatos, John, et al., “On the Building Blocks of Quality of Service in Heterogeneous IP Networks”, IEEE Communications Surveys, The Electronic Magazine of Original Peer-Reviewed Survey Articles, vol. 7, No. 1. First Quarter 2005. |
| Stankovic et al., “The Case for Feedback Control Real-Time Scheduling” 1999, IEEE pp. 1-13. |
| Stone et al., UNIX Fault Management: A Guide for System Administration, Dec. 1, 1999, ISBN 0-13-026525-X, http://www.informit.com/content/images/013026525X/samplechapter/013026525-.pdf. |
| Supercluster Research and Development Group, “Maui Administrator's Guide”, Internet citation, 2002. |
| Takahashi et al. “A Programming Interface for Network Resource Management,” 1999 IEEE, pp. 34-44. |
| Tanaka et al. “Resource Manager for Globus-Based Wide-Area Cluster Computing,” 1999 IEEE, 8 pages. |
| Tang, Wenting et al., “Load Distribution via Static Scheduling and Client Redirection for Replicated Web Servers”, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, 3115 Engineering Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1226, Proceedings of the 2000 International Workshop on Parallel Processing, pp. 127-133, IEEE 2000. |
| Taylor, M. Surridge, and D. Marvin, “Grid Resources for Industrial Applications”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 04), pp. 402-409, San Diego, California, Jul. 2004. |
| Urgaonkar, Bhuvan, et al., “Sharc: Managing CPU and Network Bandwidth in Shared Clusters”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 2-17, Jan. 2004. |
| Venaas, “IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry,” 2013, http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses/multicast-addresses.x-html. |
| Vidyarthi, A. K. Tripathi, B. K. Sarker, A. Dhawan, and L. T. Yang, “Cluster-Based Multiple Task Allocation in Distributed Computing System”, In Proceedings of the 18.sup.th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'04), p. 239, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Apr. 2004. |
| Villela, P. Pradhan, and D. Rubenstein, “Provisioning Servers in the Application Tier for E-commerce Systems”, In Proceedings of the 12.sup.th IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS '04), pp. 57-66, Jun. 2004. |
| Wang, Z., et al., “Resource Allocation for Elastic Traffic: Architecture and Mechanisms”, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2000. 2000 IEEE/IFIP, pp. 157-170. Apr. 2000. |
| Wesley et al., “Taks Allocation and Precedence Relations for Distributed Real-Time Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-36, No. 6, pp. 667-679. Jun. 1987. |
| Wolf et al. “Concepts for Resource Reservation in Advance” Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1997. |
| Workshop on Performance and Architecture of Web Servers (PAWS-2000) Jun. 17-18, 2000, Santa Clara, CA (Held in conjunction with SIGMETRICS-2000). |
| Xu, Jun, et al., “Sustaining Availability of Web Services under Distributed Denial of Service Attacks”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 195-208, Feb. 2003. |
| Xu, Zhiwei et al., “Cluster and Grid Superservers: The Dawning Experiences in China”, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2704, Beijing 100080, China. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing. IEEE 2002. |
| Yang, Chu-Sing, et al., “Building an Adaptable, Fault Tolerant, and Highly Manageable Web Server on Clusters of Non-dedicated Workstations”, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.. 2000. |
| Zeng, Daniel et al., “Efficient Web Content Delivery Using Proxy Caching Techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 270-280, Aug. 2004. |
| Zhang, Qian et al., “Resource Allocation for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 339-355, Sep. 2001. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/980,844, dated Jul. 5, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/411,616, dated Mar. 29, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/985,241, dated Apr. 3, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/088,954, dated Mar. 15, 2023. |
| Office Action, Advisory Action, on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,242, dated Mar. 3, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/171,152 dated Feb. 27, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/508,661 dated Feb. 27, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,235 dated Feb. 28, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,403 dated Feb. 28, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/697,368 dated Mar. 29, 2023. |
| Office Action, Advisory Action, on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,214, dated Feb. 14, 2023. |
| Office Action, Advisory Action, on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,076, dated Feb. 17, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 17/532,667, dated Apr. 26, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance, Corrected NOA, in U.S. Appl. No. 17/532,667, dated May 9, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,242, dated Jun. 7, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance (Corrected NOA) in U.S. Appl. No. 17/411,616, dated Apr. 6, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/412,832, dated Apr. 20, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 14/691,120, dated Feb. 9, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/171,152 dated Feb. 6, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,231 dated Feb. 6, 2023. |
| Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 17/470,209, dated Mar. 21, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/722,076, dated Mar. 21, 2023. |
| Office Action, Advisory Action, on U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,159 dated Mar. 22, 2023. |
| Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 17/711,214, dated Apr. 25, 2023. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230147352 A1 | May 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60669278 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17722062 | Apr 2022 | US |
| Child | 17980865 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17201245 | Mar 2021 | US |
| Child | 17722062 | US | |
| Parent | 16398025 | Apr 2019 | US |
| Child | 17201245 | US | |
| Parent | 14791873 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Child | 16398025 | US | |
| Parent | 11279007 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Child | 14791873 | US |
