This application claims priority to French patent application no. 1856919, filed Jul. 25, 2018, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates to a combustion chamber for a gas turbomachine, such as an aircraft turbojet or turboprop, wherein fluids (such as air and at least one fuel) generally flow from upstream to downstream to operate it.
In this field combustion chambers are known with:
FR 2 998 038 discloses such a combustion chamber wherein there is a double-walled chamber bottom: upstream and downstream, with a space (or enclosure) between them, this space being supplied with air via multi-perforation holes, in order to ensure impact cooling of the downstream wall, which is directly exposed to the flame radiation. Air is then ejected through slots or holes towards the inner and outer walls to initiate an air film which is then relayed through the multi-perforation holes in these walls.
The chamber bottom which is directly exposed to radiation in this annular configuration is thus subjected to strong thermal stresses which will, over the course of the operating cycles, deform it and no longer allow it to satisfactorily perform its main function with regard to the upstream wall, especially since it is frequent to protect the chamber bottom thermally (with regard to the flame in the furnace) by a heat shield (or a ring of heat shields) mounted in the chamber, directly downstream of the bottom wall. Applied to previous solutions as in those in
Without a heat shield or sufficient thermal resistance over time of the downstream wall, the bottom of the chamber is normally likely to (too) quickly see its integrity altered. Clearance may appear, which generates problems of pollution, fuel consumption, and re-ignition of the chamber in case of extinction. The addition of a fail-safe safety system is also an inappropriate solution, which adds to the weight of the combustion chamber.
The purpose of the invention is therefore in particular to provide an effective and economic solution to at least some of these problems and disadvantages, by aiming to achieve at least some of the following objectives in relation to the prior art, for example FR 2 998 038:
It is therefore proposed that the inner and outer walls and the heat shield should form a one-piece unit.
And, it is also proposed that, towards the upstream end of the combustion chamber, it should be provided:
The structural aspect of the CDF is thus used/valued. It is the “reference” fastening element. An appropriate stiffness is obtained.
In addition, it must also be possible to achieve effective control of the geometric tolerances of the furnace: elimination of welding operations, plasma metallization, etc. Thanks in particular to the one-piece aspect, it must be possible to ensure, for example in relation to the combustion chamber of FR 2 998 038, that the volume of the chamber is maintained in order to respect favourable re-ignition ceilings in the event of extinction in flight.
With this solution, the outer wall, a typical set of 20 baffles and the inner wall are replaced by a single part; the combustion chamber furnace becomes (essentially) closed at 360°, with a downstream opening opposite the DHP (high pressure nozzle). There may no longer be a distinct heat shield, separate from the bottom of the chamber. Leaks can be virtually eliminated between the inner/outer walls and the bottom of the chamber, and between sectorized baffles in relation to the situation of FR 2 998 038: The installation of a furnace more closed in its upstream part as compared to this situation of FR 2 998 038 eliminates inter-heat shield leakage by sector.
The term “chamber bottom” (FDC) has been used above and is also used to refer to the element 20″ below:
In this solution, this “bottom” of the furnace (marked 21″ below) continues to act as a heat shield, protecting the “bottom of the chamber” (FDC), which is not directly exposed to thermal radiation. The term “heat shield” is therefore appropriate. The expression “bottom 21′” of the one-piece assembly” has also been used below to avoid any confusion with the above-mentioned “bottom of chamber” (FDC), while noting its conformation as the bottom.
Favourably, the above one-piece assembly will be made of (i. e. based on) a refractory material, which may be (may include) a ceramic matrix composite (CMC).
The wall thickness could be between 0.9 mm and 1.6 mm.
In terms of mass, a reduction by approximately 15-25% of the overall mass of the combustion chamber is then targeted as compared to that of FR 2 998 038.
This one-piece assembly does not need to be coated with a thermal protection barrier (especially in ytrium zirconate).
In this respect, the proposed solution must allow the “bottom” of the one-piece assembly to define a thermal protection for the FDC, which can remain structuring for the combustion chamber, i.e. as the bottom wall through which the forces to be passed mainly between the bottom zone of the chamber and said inner and outer walls surrounding the area where the flames develop in the combustion chamber.
In terms of the advantages of the above-mentioned one-piece assembly, we can still note:
To further enhance the above advantages related to stress absorption, it is proposed that the heat shield part of said one-piece assembly be completely solid, thus not having cooling air passage openings to the inner and/or outer walls.
This allows the removal of the thermal barrier in the furnace, on the equivalent of the inner and outer walls and baffles in FR 2 998 038.
To further aim to eliminate leaks in the space between the FDC itself and the “bottom” of the one-piece assembly defined by the part forming the heat shield, the chamber bottom will be positively completely solid, thus being deprived of cooling air passage openings towards the part forming said heat shield of the one-piece assembly.
In this way, in particular, no welding or brazing; no resuming machining to make the previous holes in the FDC.
With a one-piece assembly, and especially one based on a refractory material, there is however a difficulty in the connection between the one-piece furnace (this assembly) and the metal parts around the turbomachine. In this respect, it is common to assemble two metal flanges with a bolted connection on which a tightening torque is applied. The approach did not seem appropriate for the present one-piece assembly. When a refractory material is used, in particular CMC, it was preferred to propose a bond where the refractory material is supported to be maintained in position in its environment, and thus avoid delamination of the material.
It is also recommended that, towards the downstream end of said chamber, second metallic (intermediate) walls are provided for inner and outer connection respectively, having inner and outer flanges, respectively, for connection between:
On these metal intermediate walls, it will be possible in particular to:
In a connection with the DHP, the welded pin and washer solution may be used to hold the outer flange and the inner flange only to provide a sealing connection with the DHP lamellae.
Between the bottom (said heat shield) of the one-piece assembly and the metal elements for mounting the fuel injection devices that pass through the FDC, which is itself metallic, there have been consequential problems of thermal stress, wear and brittleness, especially if the one-piece assembly is made of a refractory material.
A solution provided consists
With this clearance between the sheath of the equipped FDC and a furnace that can be made of CMC, any contact between the refractory material and the metal will be avoided, thus limiting mechanical risks on a large, fragile one-piece element.
According to another characteristic, it is proposed:
On this subject and as already mentioned, to produce the above-mentioned assembly in one-piece, and this a priori based on refractory material (s) must allow, compared to the current combustion chambers with metal (inner, outer and “ring of heat shields”) walls, a maintenance of the chamber volume to respect the re-ignition ceilings; deformations on walls and flanges are limited (ovalization), in particular due to the higher temperature resistance of refractory materials (with CMC, T>2000° C.) and the advantages in terms of thermal transfer due to the one-piece characteristic. The upstream face of the furnace made of a refractory material no longer needs to be cooled as was the case with metal heat shields in the past, thus possibly eliminating the usual multi-perforation on metal chamber bottoms. It should be noted that the possible removal of primary holes and dilution holes is also due to the presence of a multipoint injection system: on metal combustion chambers, all primary or dilution hole openings generate crack initiation; removing these holes will improve the service life of the part.
In general, further advantages are also expected:
In addition to the combustion chamber just presented, the invention also relates to a gas turbomachine for an aircraft equipped with this combustion chamber.
The term having been used, it is specified that the fuel injectors called “multipoint” are new generation injectors that allow adaptation to the various speeds of the turbomachine. Each injector has two fuel systems: the one called “pilot” which has a permanent flow optimized for low rpm and the one called “multipoint” which has an intermittent flow optimized for high rpm. The multipoint system is used when additional engine thrust is required, particularly in the cruise and aircraft take-off phases.
The invention also relates to a combustion chamber for a gas turbomachine, the combustion chamber comprising:
The realization in a succession of sectors is useful for stress management, taking into account the one-piece design of said inner and outer wall/heat shield assembly, and all the more so (as already mentioned above):
This is why another aspect of the invention relates to a combustion chamber for a gas turbomachine, the combustion chamber comprising:
The invention will be better understood, if need be, and other details, characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear upon reading the following description given by way of a non restrictive example while referring to the appended drawings wherein:
In the embodiment shown in
The compressor 3 is centrifugal and includes a rotary impeller 11 designed to accelerate the air flowing through it and thereby increase the kinetic energy of the air. The compressed air introduced into the combustion chamber 10 is mixed with fuel from injectors, such as the injectors 4 in
The diffuser 7 annularly surrounds the impeller. The diffuser 7 is used to reduce the speed of the air leaving the impeller and thereby increase its static pressure.
The chamber 10 consists of a metal outer revolution wall 16 and a metal inner revolution wall 18, connected upstream to an annular transverse wall 20, or a chamber bottom wall. Thanks to (radially) outer 22 and inner 24 annular flanges respectively, and at the downstream end, the chamber 10 is in axial support against outer and inner annular shrouds respectively, of a nozzle, here the high pressure nozzle 23, via sealing lamellae 220, 240 connected to said (radially) outer 22 and inner 24 annular flanges, respectively. These flanges axially bear against axial pins 221, 241, respectively, which are fitted to the outer and inner ring shrouds 247 and 249 and can be centred by springs 223, 243. As the outer annular flange could do externally, the radially inner annular flange 24 extends radially inwardly with respect to the sealing lamellae 240 by a pin-shaped annular support member 245 opening in the downstream direction which bears against a casing 25, called the HP nozzle support casing. Between the outer and inner annular shrouds of the nozzle 23, which is also attached, there are substantially radial blades 251.
It can be considered that the inner casing 14 along the chamber 10 is defined by, or includes, a diffuser shroud 26 and an inner intermediate web 28 attached upstream to the shroud 26 and downstream to the casing 25.
In the example in
The radial aspect will, in this application, be assessed in relation to axes X and I-I′, the axial aspect being therefore assessed in reference to one or other of said axes, the axis of revolution of the combustion chamber being itself parallel to (combined with) the longitudinal axis of the turbomachine. As regards this point, the expressions external/outer internal/inner should be understood as with regard to the radial direction.
The pins 42 are fastened to the outer casing 12 and at least to the walls 16, 20 fastened together. Preferably, there are four such pins 42 distributed uniformly around the X axis.
While the cross-section in
An injector 4 is mounted in each of the plurality of injection systems 2. A combustion chamber of revolution usually includes a large number of injectors 4 circumferentially distributed around the X axis.
Each injection system 2 includes a bowl 6 diverging towards the furnace 11′ of the chamber 10′ (downstream/AV) to burst the outgoing jet of the mixture of air and fuel, a floating ring 8 for sliding the bowl 6 into the anchoring sheath 13, one or more spins 15 allowing to introduce air with a turning movement. Each multipoint injector 4 essentially comprises a fuel supply arm 30, one or more spin stage(s) 31 allowing, like the spins 15 of the injection system, to introduce air with a turning movement, a fuel nozzle 32 placed on the I-I′ axis of the injector 4 and a network 33 of n fuel injection ports 330 drilled at the periphery of the injector 4. Each injector 4 is fastened to the walls 16′, 18′ and is mounted in an injection system 2 described above. More precisely, the supply arm 30 is fixed to the casing 12′ in such a way that the network 33 of injection ports 330 is mounted in the upstream part of the spin body 15. The assembly is thus mounted in such a way that there is a precise centering (and therefore concentricity) between the injector 4 and its associated injection system 2. If necessary, a multipoint injector 4 has one or more purge hole(s) t for introducing air axially into the injection system 2.
A multipoint injector 4 is therefore designed to include, on the one hand, a fuel nozzle 32 arranged along its axis that injects fuel at a permanent flow rate, and on the other hand, multipoint orifices 330 drilled at the periphery of the injector that inject fuel at an intermittent rate for high engine speeds. The fuel “pilot system” designed to supply the nozzle 32 is also used to cool the fuel system designed to supply the multipoint orifices 330.
The air diffuser 7′ opens into a space 9′ along the axis of the I-I′ axis of the injector 4.
Like the cover 40, the cover 40′ is crossed by openings 41′ for mounting the injectors 4, which receive a mixture of air and fuel. Coaxially, first and second openings 43, 45 respectively pass through the chamber bottom 20′ and the heat shield 21′, which can be a ring in one or more parts, circumferentially. Each opening is coaxial with the axis of the injector concerned, the axis I-I′
With metal outer 16′ and inner 18′ walls, these walls are traversed by primary holes and dilution holes 44′, 46′ (which were already present in
In both the solution in
In the solution in
To overcome the disadvantages mentioned at the beginning of the text, and in particular to improve the service life of the combustion chamber and/or reduce parasitic gas leaks in the area of the equipped FDC and/or better control the overall mass of the combustion chamber, it is first proposed, rather than locally adapting one aspect or another, for example, of one of the combustion chambers 10, 10′, to make said inner and outer walls and said at least one heat shield—arranged downstream of the bottom wall to protect it thermally—so that they jointly form a one-piece assembly, as shown in
It can thus be seen in
The one-piece assembly 100 is made of a refractory material including CMC.
The bottom, consisting of the heat shield part 21″, of the one-piece assembly defines a thermal protection for the FDC 20″, which, as it is metallic and has a thickness greater than or equal to that of the one-piece assembly 100, is mechanically structuring for the combustion chamber.
The shape, parallel to each I-I″ axis of the injector 4″ of the injection system, 2″ of the one-piece assembly 100 is substantially frustoconical in the downstream direction.
(In particular) to eliminate air leaks in the space 56″ between the FDC 20″ and the bottom 21″ of the one-piece assembly, this bottom 21″ is here entirely solid, except for the second openings 45″. The heat shield 21″ thus has no through holes (see points 49, 51
In addition, the refractory material-based construction of the one-piece assembly 100 may allow that, with the exception of said first mounting openings 43″ of the fuel injection devices 2″/4″ (see
For a connection—with controlled (mechanical/thermal) stresses and manufacturing—between the one-piece assembly 100 and the metal parts around the turbomachine (if they exist: pins 42, lamellae 220, 240, edges of the arms 26″ and/or the outer casing 12″ for fixing via the screws 54′, 52″ . . . ), it is proposed that, towards the upstream end of the combustion chamber 100, first metal inner connecting walls 60 and outer connecting walls 58, respectively, will be provided, connecting the metal cover 40′″ (which extends upstream of the chamber bottom 20″) and the inner walls 18″ and outer walls 16″, respectively, together; see
In addition, towards the downstream end of said chamber, second metal inner connecting walls 64 and outer connecting walls 62 are provided respectively (see
The metal connecting walls 58, 60, 62, 64 will therefore be flexible sheets, more deformable than the refractory material of the assembly 100, when the turbomachine is in operation.
The downstream positioning of these metal connecting walls will therefore be favourable, or even necessary, to ensure water-tightness with the DHP sectors 23 (
In any case, it could be planned to combine fasteners together; for example, extend the outer flange 22″ to attach it to the outer casing 12 (
Again for the issues of connection with controlled mechanical/thermal stresses and simplified manufacture (due to the dissociation of the parts: assembly 100 on the one hand and metal connecting walls, 58 to 64, on the other hand, pins 66 and washers 68 welded together can in particular be used for the connections between said inner walls 18″ and outer walls 16″ of the one-piece assembly 100 and the metal inner 60, 64 and outer 58. 62 connecting walls respectively; see
On the other hand, the (metal) connections between the FDC 20″, the (metal) cover 40″ and respectively the first metal inner connecting walls 60 and the first metal outer connecting walls 58, will preferably be provided a priori by screw-nuts 70, 72 that will pass through them.
On the downstream side, the solution with pins 66 and washers 68 welded together will make it possible to maintain the downstream metal inner connecting walls 64 and outer connecting wall 62 only to ensure a watertight connection with the lamellae 220, 240 of the DHP 23, if such a connection is provided (cf.
To limit thermal stresses, wear and tear and fragility between the bottom 21″ of said one-piece assembly 100 and the metal elements (15 . . . ) for mounting the fuel injection devices that pass through the FDC 20″, and even more so with a one-piece assembly based on a refractory material, it is proposed:
Any contact between the fragile refractory material and the metal will thus be avoided.
In the example shown in
The part(s) forming the inner 18″ and/or outer 16″ walls, respectively, of the one-piece assembly 100 is/are traversed by primary holes 44″ and dilution holes 46″ that open into the furnace 11″. Some multi-perforation holes 47″, to inject cooling air into the furnace, were also shown locally. If they exist, they extend over a much larger area, as known.
However, fuel injection devices 2″ can be multipoint (with injectors 4″) (see
If the fuel injection devices 2″ are multipoint (with injectors 4″), then said part forming the inner 18″ and/or outer 16″ walls, respectively, of the one-piece assembly 100 may be completely solid, thus with no primary and dilution holes.
Thus, due to the one-piece nature of the assembly 100, its construction (preferably a refractory material) and a multipoint fuel injection, such holes 44″ and/or 46″ in the walls 18″ and/or 16″ could be avoided. Moreover, this is the case in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1856919 | Jul 2018 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070186558 | De Sousa | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20120234013 | Overman | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140318138 | Bunel | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160215980 | Chang | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170370584 | Boardman et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 107 308 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2 998 038 | May 2014 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200033004 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |