Test plates for chemical or biochemical analyses, or sample preparation and purification, which contain a plurality of individual wells or reaction chambers, are well-known laboratory tools. Such devices have been employed for a broad variety of purposes and assays, and are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,734,192 and 5,009,780, 5,141,719 for example. Microporous membrane filters and filtration devices containing the same have become particularly useful with many of the recently developed cell and tissue culture techniques and assays, especially in the fields of virology and immunology. Multiwell plates, used in assays, often utilize a vacuum applied to the underside of the membrane as the driving force to generate fluid flow through the membrane. Centrifugation also can be used. The microplate format has been used as a convenient format for plate processing such as pipetting, washing, shaking, detecting, storing, etc.
Typically, a 96-well filtration plate is used to conduct multiple assays or purifications simultaneously. In the case of multiwell products, a membrane is placed on the bottom of each of the wells. The membrane has specific properties selected to separate different molecules by filtration or to support biological or chemical reactions. High throughput applications, such as DNA sequencing, PCR product cleanup, plasmid preparation, drug screening and sample binding and elution require products that perform consistently and effectively.
One such filtration device commercially available from Millipore Corporation under the name “Multiscreen” is a 96-well filter plate that can be loaded with adsorptive materials, filter materials or particles. The Multiscreen underdrain has a phobic spray applied in order to facilitate the release of droplets. More specifically, the MultiScreen includes an underdrain system that includes a spout for filtrate collection. This spout not only directs the droplets but also controls the size of the droplets. Without the underdrain system, very large drops form across the entire underside of the membrane and can cause contamination of individual wells. Access to the membrane can be had by removing the underdrain. However, the device is not compatible with automated robotics equipment such as liquid handlers, stackers, grippers and bar code readers.
The Society for Biomolecular Screening (SBS) has published certain dimensional standards for microplates in response to non-uniform commercial products. Specifically, the dimensions of microplates produced by different vendors varied, causing numerous problems when microplates were to be used in automated laboratory instrumentation. The SBS standards address these variances by providing dimensional limits for microplates intended for automation.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a multiplate format that is in compliance with the SBS standards, yet maximizes well volume and is compatible with both vacuum and high speed centrifugation.
It also would be desirable to provide a multiplate format that is a one-piece design having high rigidity capable of withstanding high centrifugal load.
The problems of the prior art have been overcome by the present invention, which provides a laboratory device designed particularly for a multiplate format that includes a plate or tray having a plurality of wells, and a drain in fluid communication with each of the plurality of wells. The plate is a one-piece design having a honeycomb structure that brings high rigidity to the plate in order to accept very high centrifugal load. The design also maximizes the well volume and active filtration area while remaining in compliance with SBS format.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a multiwell device including a multiwell plate or tray having a support such as a membrane for filtration, each respective well of the device terminating in a spout which can direct fluid draining therefrom to a collection plate or the like without the need for a spacer. The plate is configured to maximize the volume of each well while conforming to SBS standards, and to minimize the distance between the exit orifice of the plate and a collection plate in order to minimize or avoid cross contamination. When positioned over a collection plate with corresponding wells, vents are provided to vent gases from the wells out of the device.
Turning first to
Suitable materials of construction for the device of the present invention include polymers such as polycarbonates, polyesters, nylons, PTFE resins and other fluoropolymers, acrylic and methacrylic resins and copolymers, polysulphones, polyethersulphones, polyarylsulphones, polystyrenes, polyvinyl chlorides, chlorinated polyvinyl chlorides, ABS and its alloys and blends, polyolefins, preferably polyethylenes such as linear low density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene and copolymers thereof, polypropylene and copolymers thereof and metallocene generated polyolefins. Preferred polymers are polyolefins, in particular polyethylenes and their copolymers, polystyrenes and polycarbonates.
In the embodiment shown, the plate 10 includes a plurality of wells 12 having an open top and a bottom having a surface to which is sealed a substrate or support 111, such as a membrane. In view of the configuration of the well bottoms, the substrate 111 is preferably inserted into the well from the top, such as by a vacuum transfer operation. A disk of a size sufficient to cover the bottom of the well and be sealed to the well walls is formed such as by cutting, and transferred by vacuum inside each well 12. The disk is sealed to the well walls preferably by heat sealing, by contacting the periphery of the disk with a hot probe or the like. Care must be taken to avoid contacting the well walls with the hot probe to avoid melting. A suitable sealing technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,605 the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. With reference to
The type of membrane suitable is not particularly limited, and can include nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, polycarbonate, polypropylene and PVDF microporous membranes, PES or ultrafiltration membranes such as those made from polysulfone, PVDF , cellulose or the like. Each well contains or is associated with its own support 111 that can be the same or different from the support associated with one or more of the other wells. Each such individual support is preferably coextensive with the bottom of its respective well.
Turning now to
The well design of the present invention is such that the well walls 11 shared by adjacent wells are thinner than in conventional plates. Stated differently, the distance between wells is decreased, so that the volume of each well is greater than in conventional plates of the same overall size. The honeycomb structure allows this configuration without sacrificing rigidity or strength. In a 96 well plate, for example, conventional well volume is 480 microliters per well. In the plate of the present invention, the well volume of an individual well in a 96 well format is 600 microliters. In addition, the resulting bottom well diameter is 8 mm compared to 7.2 mm in conventional designs, resulting in an active filtration area increase of 23%.
As shown in
In addition, this configuration provides vents for the passage of air in order to vent the collection plate curing vacuum or centrifugation. Specifically, the outer perimeter of the bottom 18 of the well is carefully chosen to be slightly less than inner perimeter of the collection plate well, so that a small gap 19 exists between the bottom 18 of the filtration plate well 12 and the top of the collection plate well, as seen in
A gap 21 is also formed between the perimeter of the filtration plate 10 and the collection plate 110 to further vent gas vented from the wells 112, as depicted by the arrows in
The configuration of the filtration plate 10 in accordance with the present invention allows for multiple filtration plates to be stacked one over the other, as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3471019 | Trasen et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3806424 | Rolinson | Apr 1974 | A |
4167875 | Meakin | Sep 1979 | A |
RE30562 | Park | Mar 1981 | E |
4299920 | Peters | Nov 1981 | A |
4304865 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4317726 | Shepel | Mar 1982 | A |
4404006 | Williams et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4493815 | Fernwood et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4526690 | Kiovsky et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4734192 | Champion et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4797259 | Matkovich et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4902481 | Clark et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4948442 | Manns | Aug 1990 | A |
5047215 | Manns | Sep 1991 | A |
5108704 | Bowers et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5141718 | Clark | Aug 1992 | A |
5223133 | Clark et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5326533 | Lee et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5650323 | Root | Jul 1997 | A |
5679310 | Manns | Oct 1997 | A |
5846493 | Bankier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5885499 | Aksberg | Mar 1999 | A |
5906796 | Blevins et al. | May 1999 | A |
5972694 | Mathus | Oct 1999 | A |
6086827 | Horner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6309605 | Zermani | Oct 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4143419 | Dec 1993 | DE |
0 328 038 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 359 249 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 131 934 | Dec 1991 | EP |
1 110 610 | Jun 2001 | EP |
8203690 | Oct 1982 | WO |
8607606 | Dec 1986 | WO |
9715394 | May 1997 | WO |
9855233 | Dec 1998 | WO |
0066268 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0176717 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0178896 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0226364 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02096563 | Dec 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030219360 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |