The technology discussed herein relates generally to rubber compositions. In particular, it relates to methods for synthesizing nanoparticle and liquid polymer blends in a single batch.
As depicted in the example shown in
Nanoparticles and liquid polymers for use in rubber compositions are known from commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/305,279, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The combination of nanoparticle and liquid polymer improves important properties of rubber articles, such as vehicle tires, and in particular, the tread portion of vehicle tires. For example, wet/dry traction and rolling resistance of tire tread can be improved with the addition of nanoparticles and liquid polymers while maintaining good reinforcement for tread durability. A reduction or elimination of the amount of processing oils needed in a composition used for vehicle tires, and this is made possible by the liquid polymer and nanoparticle rubber composition.
However, there are difficulties in synthesizing and processing the previously disclosed nanoparticles and liquid polymers. Previously known methods involve synthesizing nanoparticles and liquid polymer separately, drying them separately, and then separately adding each component into a rubber composition. The nanoparticles suffer from poor dispersion in the rubber compound and the liquid polymer is difficult to process. Processing problems stem from the fact that the liquid polymer is a highly viscous substance that is very difficult to separate from solvent and dry. The two separate components also have to be stored separately, thereby consuming valuable inventory space.
The technology disclosed herein allows the nanoparticles and liquid polymer to be synthesized together in the same batch. The resulting blend is easier to process and dry than a separately synthesized liquid polymer. The blend also facilitates dispersion of the nanoparticles. It also saves inventory space since only one product in one container needs to be stored, instead of two products in two containers.
A method for performing a one-batch synthesis of a blend of nanoparticles and liquid polymer includes polymerizing a first monomer and optionally a second monomer in a hydrocarbon solvent to form the liquid polymer. The polymerization is partially terminated with a quenching agent. Then a charge of polymerization initiator, and a mixture of multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer and mono-vinyl aromatic monomer are added. This causes further polymerization whereby nanoparticles are formed in situ having a core including the multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer, and a shell including the first monomer or the first monomer and the second monomer.
A composition of matter consists essentially of a blend of core-shell type micellar nanoparticles and a liquid polymer. The nanoparticles are dispersed and blended with the liquid polymer.
The blends of nanoparticle and liquid polymer made by the methods disclosed herein may be added to a rubber composition to produce a nanoparticle/liquid polymer rubber composition. As an example, a tire that incorporates the nanoparticle/liquid polymer rubber composition can be formed by a tire tread comprising the rubber composition, and constructing a tire using the tire tread.
Methods for performing a one-batch synthesis for making a blend of nanoparticles and liquid polymer are disclosed herein. An illustrative method involves a liquid polymer polymerization process wherein a first monomer and a second monomer are polymerized in a hydrocarbon solvent in a pot (reaction vessel). The copolymerization process is allowed to proceed to completion and is partially terminated with a quenching agent. These monomers copolymerize to form a liquid polymer. The ratio of terminated polymers to unterminated, living polymers can vary according to the application. A broad range is 1-99 wt % terminated, liquid polymer to 99-1 wt % unterminated, living polymer. A preferable range for at least some applications is 25-75 wt % terminated, liquid polymer to 75-25 wt % unterminated, living polymer.
As part of this example method, a charge of polymerization initiator and a mixture of multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer and a mono-vinyl aromatic monomer are added to the same pot that contains the liquid polymer. This charge initiates a second polymerization process wherein unterminated monomer chains left over from the liquid polymer polymerization process copolymerize with the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer. The resulting copolymers self-assemble into core-shell type micelle structures in the hydrocarbon solvent. The multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer functions to cross-link the micelles holding them together as nanoparticles.
As used herein, unless otherwise stated, a charge or addition to the reaction vessel may be simultaneous or stepwise. Stepwise means that either the addition of one ingredient is completed before the addition of another ingredient is begun, or the addition of one ingredient is begun (but not necessarily completed) before the addition of another ingredient has begun.
Alternatively, another illustrative method involves a liquid polymerization step as described above. However, in this method the nanoparticle polymerization process differs in that there is a step-wise addition of a charge of mono-vinyl aromatic monomer (first), and then (secondly) a charge of multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer and initiator to the pot. The resulting copolymers self-assemble into core-shell type micelles in the hydrocarbon solvent, and the multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer functions to cross-link the micelles holding them together as nanoparticles.
The blends that result from the first method and the second method are typically not the same. Under similar conditions, the first method produces polymer nanoparticles with a core densely crosslinked at the center of the core; while the second method gives polymer nanoparticles with a core relatively less densely crosslinked, but crosslinked throughout the entire core.
The crosslinking density can be defined as number of crosslinks per monomer (Xd). In an example where the nanoparticle comprises monomers of styrene and divinyl benzene as the crosslinking agent, the Xd is determined by the ratio of moles of DVB to moles of DVB and styrene. This number may range from 0.01 to 1, for example 0.1 to 0.8, such as 0.2 to 0.4. In the example first method described above the cross-linking density may be 0.2-0.4, for example 0.3, and in the example second method described above the cross-linking density may be 0.8-1.0, for example 0.9.
Preferably a crosslinking agent is selected which has an affinity to the vinyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon monomer blocks and migrates to the center of the micelles due to its compatibility with the monomer units and initiator residues present in the center of the micelle and its relative incompatibility with the solvent and monomer units present in the outer layer of the micelle.
The one-batch processes described herein yields a blend that is easier to process and dry than when the liquid polymer is synthesized separately. Dispersion of the nanoparticles is also facilitated. The resulting blends also save inventory space since only one product in one container needs to be stored, instead of two products in two containers.
The first step of the illustrative methods described above results in the polymerization of the liquid polymer. A first monomer is added to a reaction vessel along with an anionic initiator to start the polymerization of the monomers and form a liquid polymer. The liquid polymer may comprise a homopolymer, such as polybutadiene, when only a single type of monomer is polymerized. The liquid polymer may also comprise a copolymer, such as styrene-butadiene copolymer when a first and second monomer are polymerized.
The anionic initiator is preferably selected from any known organolithium compounds. Suitable organolithium compounds are represented by the formula as shown below:
R(Li)X
wherein R is a hydrocarbyl group having 1 to x valence(s). R generally contains 1 to 20, preferably 2-8, carbon atoms per R group, and x is an integer of 1-4. Typically, x is 1, and the R group includes aliphatic radicals and cycloaliphatic radicals, such as alkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, alkylcycloalkyl, alkenyl, as well as aryl and alkylaryl radicals. Other known initiators can also be employed. As specific examples, n-butyllithium, sec-butyl lithium, tert-butyllithium, or a mixture thereof can be used as initiators.
The polymerization is partially terminated by adding a quenching agent. This partial termination leaves unterminated polymers for forming the shell of the nanoparticle in the subsequent nanoparticle polymerization process. The partial termination step is relatively fast. For example, the partial termination may be run for about 15 minutes. As used herein, partial means less than complete.
The liquid polymer can be made by a batch process or continuously. Typically, a hydrocarbon solvent is used, although it may be possible to use other solvents. According to the process disclosed herein there are some advantages to synthesizing the liquid polymer in a batch process. However, it is also possible to perform the method described herein by a continuous process in a single batch. By “single batch” or “one-batch” it is meant that there is no isolation and drying between polymerization steps. In a continuous process the monomers and an initiator are continuously fed into the reaction vessel with solvent.
The pressure in the reaction vessel should be sufficient to maintain a substantially liquid phase under the conditions of the polymerization reaction. The reaction medium may generally be maintained at a temperature that is within the range of about 20° C. to about 140° C. throughout the copolymerization.
After the reaction has had time to proceed to for a relatively low molecular weight polymer, the reaction is quenched by adding a terminating agent (also called a quenching agent as used herein). The amount of terminating agent added determines how much of the polymer becomes terminated liquid polymer, and how much of the polymer remains unterminated with a living end. Since the polymers with living ends are later used to form the shell layer of the nanoparticles, the amount of terminating agent also determines the ratio of liquid polymer to nanoparticles in the nanoparticle/liquid polymer blend.
The formation of the liquid polymer is complete after the reaction is partially terminated with the quenching agent. In the illustrative methods described herein a charge is then added that begins the nanoparticle polymerization process.
In an illustrative nanoparticle polymerization process, an anionic initiator is first added (i.e. before adding the mono- and multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers) to aid in forming and stabilizing of micelles before cross-linking occurs. The initiator can also be added at the same time as the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer and multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers although preferably not through the same port. Initiators may be those described above.
After addition of the initiator or concurrently with the addition of the initiator the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer and multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer are added to the same reaction vessel that the liquid polymer was formed in. The initiator encourages the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer to copolymerize with the unterminated polymer chains left over from the liquid polymer process to form a copolymer. This occurs through an anionic, living polymerization. The copolymer chains then self-assemble in the hydrocarbon solvent into micelles. The multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer serves to cross-link the micelles holding them together as nanoparticles.
In one example, the copolymers are di-block copolymers comprising a polyconjugated diene block and a mono-vinyl aromatic block, such as block styrene-butadiene. The mono-vinyl aromatic blocks are typically crosslinked by the multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer. The polymer nanoparticles preferably retain their discrete nature with little or no polymerization between each other. In some embodiments, the nanoparticles are substantially monodisperse and uniform in shape, in others the nanoparticles have a polymodal size distribution.
The copolymerization of the nanoparticle chains may last as long as necessary until the desired monomer conversion, degree of polymerization (DP), and block polymer molecular weight are obtained. The polymerization reaction of this step may last typically from about 0.5 hours to about 20 hours, preferably from about 0.5 hours to about 10 hours, more preferably from about 0.5 hours to about 5 hours. The polymerization reaction of this step may be conducted at a temperature of from about 30° F. to about 300° F., preferably from about 100° F. to about 250° F., and more preferably from about 150° F. to about 210° F.
The polymerization reactions used to prepare the polymer nanoparticles may be terminated with a terminating agent. Suitable terminating agents include, but are not limited to, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, and isopropanol. In exemplified embodiments, the polymerization reaction mixture was cooled and dropped in an isopropanol/acetone solution containing an antioxidant such as butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The isopropanol/acetone solution may be prepared, for example, by mixing 1 part by volume of isopropanol and 4 parts by volume of acetone.
To terminate the polymerization of the nanoparticle chains, and thus control polymer molecular weight, a functional terminating agent may be employed to provide terminal functionality. Exemplary functional terminating agents include, but are not limited to, SnCl4, R3SnCl, R2SnCl2, RSnCl3, carbodiimides, N-methylpyrrolidine, cyclic amides, cyclic ureas, isocyanates, Schiff bases, 4,4′-bis(diethylamino)benzophenone, N,N′-dimethylethyleneurea, and mixtures thereof, wherein R is selected from the group consisting of alkyls having from about 1 to about 20 carbon atoms, cycloalkyls having from about 3 to about 20 carbon atoms, aryls having from about 6 to about 20 carbon atoms, aralkyls having from about 7 to about 20 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof.
In an example, a liquid hydrocarbon medium serves as a dispersion solvent and facilitates the formation of the micelle-like nanoparticles. This hydrocarbon solvent is added in the liquid polymer polymerization step and if necessary more may be added with the nanoparticle polymerization charge. The liquid hydrocarbon may be selected from any suitable aliphatic hydrocarbons, alicyclic hydrocarbons, or mixture thereof, with a proviso that it exists in liquid state during the nanoparticles' formation procedure. Exemplary aliphatic hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, pentane, isopentane, 2,2 dimethyl-butane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, decane, and the like. Exemplary alicyclic hydrocarbons include, but are not limited to, cyclopentane, methyl cyclopentane, cyclohexane, methyl cyclohexane, cycloheptane, cyclooctane, cyclononane, cyclodecane, and the like. In one embodiment, the liquid hydrocarbon medium comprises hexane.
The liquid polymer that is present in the batch can also be considered a solvent. The liquid polymer also aids in dispersion by intercalating itself between the living polymer chains when they are in the micelle formation. This helps to isolate the inside of the nanoparticle from the solvent. Consequently, this causes the micelle to be more stable and decreases the chances of two or more micelles meeting each other and potentially linking, which would result in the creation of much larger particles. The liquid polymer causes the nanoparticle to swell, and the resulting mixture is softer and more easily mixed into rubber compounds.
Without being bound to any particular theory, it is believed that the poly(conjugated diene) block is more soluble or miscible in a selected liquid solvent, such as hexane, than the mono-vinyl aromatic block. This facilitates the subsequent micelle-like assembling and nanoparticle formation from the block copolymer chains.
Depending on their miscibility, polymer chains in solution or suspension system can be self-assembled into domains of various structures. Without being bound to any theory, it is believed that a micelle-like structure may be formed by aggregating the block copolymer chains comprising the poly(conjugated diene) block and the aromatic block. The mono-vinyl aromatic blocks are typically directed toward the center of the micelle and the poly(conjugated diene) blocks are typically extended away from the center.
The polymer nanoparticles are formed from the cross-linked micelle-like structures with a core made from the mono-vinyl aromatic blocks, and a shell made from the poly(conjugated diene) blocks. It is believed that the multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers crosslink the center core of the micelle to stabilize and hold together the polymer nanoparticles.
In an alternative example, the nanoparticle polymerization step may be conducted in the presence of a modifier or a 1,2-microstructure controlling agent, so as to, for example, increase the reaction rate, equalize the reactivity ratio of monomers, and/or control the 1,2-microstructure in the conjugated diene monomers. Suitable modifiers include, but are not limited to, triethylamine, tri-n-butylamine, hexamethylphosphoric acid triamide, N,N, N′,N′-tetramethylethylene diamine, ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, diethyl ether, tri-n-butylphosphine, p-dioxane, 1,2 dimethoxy ethane, dimethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, ethyl propyl ether, di-n-propyl ether, di-n-octyl ether, anisole, dibenzyl ether, diphenyl ether, dimethylethylamine, bix-oxolanyl propane, tri-n-propyl amine, trimethyl amine, triethyl amine, N,N-dimethyl aniline, N-ethylpiperidine, N-methyl-N-ethyl aniline, N-methylmorpholine, tetramethylenediamine, oligomeric oxolanyl propanes (OOPs), 2,2-bis-(4-methyl dioxane), bistetrahydrofuryl propane, and the like.
Other modifiers or 1,2-microstructure controlling agents used in the present invention may be linear oxolanyl oligomers represented by the structural formula (IV) and cyclic oligomers represented by the structural formula (V), as shown below:
wherein R14 and R15 are independently hydrogen or a C1-C8 alkyl group; R16, R17, R18, and R19 are independently hydrogen or a C1-C6 alkyl group; y is an integer of 1 to 5 inclusive, and z is an integer of 3 to 5 inclusive.
Specific examples of modifiers or 1,2-microstructure controlling agents include, but are not limited to, oligomeric oxolanyl propanes (OOPs); 2,2-bis-(4-methyl dioxane); bis(2-oxolanyl)methane; 1,1-bis(2-oxolanyl)ethane; bistetrahydrofuryl propane; 2,2-bis(2-oxolanyl) propane; 2,2-bis(5-methyl-2-oxolanyl)propane; 2,2-bis-(3,4,5-trimethyl-2-oxolanyl)propane; 2,5-bis(2-oxolanyl-2-propyl)oxolane; octamethyl perhydrocyclotetrafurfurylene (cyclic tetramer); 2,2-bis(2-oxolanyl)butane; and the like. A mixture of two or more modifiers or 1,2-microstructure controlling agents also can be used.
The synthesized liquid polymer that results from the liquid polymerization process comprises a homopolymer of conjugated diene monomers or a copolymer of conjugated diene monomers with, for example, vinyl aromatic monomers and/or trienes such as myrcene, among others. As used herein, liquid polymers of conjugated diene monomers include not only polymers of the same conjugated diene monomers such as a liquid poly(butadiene), but also include copolymers of one or more conjugated diene monomers with other monomers; for example, isoprene-butadiene rubber or styrene-butadiene rubber.
The conjugated diene monomer may be one or more of conjugated diene monomers. C4-C8 conjugated diene monomers of formula (I) are the most preferred. Specific examples of the conjugated diene monomers include, but are not limited to, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene), cis- and trans-piperylene (1,3-pentadiene), 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, cis- and trans-1,3hexadiene, cis- and trans-2-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, cis- and trans-3-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 4-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 2,4-dimethyl-1,3-pentadiene, and the like, and the mixture thereof. In preferred embodiments, isoprene or 1,3-butadiene or mixtures thereof is used as the conjugated diene monomer(s).
The number average molecular weight (Mn) of the liquid polymer is preferably controlled (e.g. by controlling the ratio of monomers to initiator) within the range of from about 10,000 to about 120,000, within the range of from about 20,000 to about 110,000, or within the range of from about 25,000 to about 100,000. The weight average molecular weight of the liquid polymer can range from about 20,000 to 100,000, for example 70,000 to 90,000.
The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the liquid polymer is, for example, within the range of from about −90° C. to about −20° C., such as within the range of from about −90° C. to about −40° C., or from about −90° C. to about −50° C. The liquid polymer may exhibit only one glass transition temperature.
When the synthesized liquid polymer is a copolymer of conjugated diene monomer(s), the comonomer may be vinyl aromatic monomer selected from the group consisting of styrene, ethylvinylbenzene, a-methyl-styrene, 1-vinyl naphthalene, 2-vinyl naphthalene, vinyl toluene, methoxystyrene, t-butoxystyrene, and the like; as well as alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkaryl, and aralkyl derivatives thereof, in which the total number of carbon atoms in the monomer is generally not greater than about 20; and mixtures thereof. In exemplary embodiments, the conjugated diene monomer and vinyl aromatic monomer are normally used at the weight ratios of about 99:1 to about 1:99, or about 30:70 to about 90:10, or preferably about 85:15 to about 60:40.
The liquid polymer may comprise polyisoprene, polybutadiene, styrene-butadiene copolymer, styrene-isoprene-butadiene copolymer, styrene-isoprene copolymer, butadiene-isoprene copolymer, liquid butyl rubber, liquid neoprene, ethylene-propylene copolymer, ethylene-propylene-diene copolymer, acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer, liquid silicone, ethylene acrylic copolymer, ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, liquid epichlorohydrin, liquid chlorinated polyethylene, liquid chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubbers, liquid hydrogenated nitrile rubber, liquid tetrafluoroethylene-propylene rubber, liquid hydrogenated polybutadiene and styrene-butadiene copolymer, and the like, and the mixture thereof.
In one example the liquid polymer is a styrene-butadiene copolymer. The styrene-butadiene has an Mw of about 80,000 to 120,000 and is comprised of repeat units that are derived from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent styrene and correspondingly from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent 1,3-butadiene, wherein the repeat units derived from styrene and 1,3-butadiene are in essentially random order. In this example, in the liquid polymerization process of the illustrative methods, the first monomer is styrene and the second monomer is butadiene. Vinyl percentages of 50-60% are preferred for some applications because this range is easy to achieve synthetically with styrene as the monomer. However, lower vinyl levels are also possible.
In another example, the liquid polymer comprises a liquid isoprene-butadiene rubber (IBR) with Mw of about 35,000 to 70,000, which is comprised of repeat units that are derived from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent isoprene and correspondingly from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent 1,3-butadiene, wherein the repeat units derived from isoprene and 1,3-butadiene are in essentially random order. In this example, the first monomer is isoprene and the second monomer is butadiene according to the illustrative methods described above.
The polymer nanoparticles synthesized in the one-batch methods described herein include a vulcanizable shell and a crosslinked core. The monomers that comprise the shell may be curable by vulcanization by sulfur or peroxide. Examples of suitable sulfur vulcanizing agents include “rubber maker's” soluble sulfur; elemental sulfur (free sulfur); sulfur donating vulcanizing agents such as organosilane polysulfides, amine disulfides, polymeric polysulfides or sulfur olefin adducts; and insoluble polymeric sulfur. Related prior patents and publications U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,050 (Bridgestone Corp.) and Macromol. Symp. 118, 143-148 (1997) disclose some suitable sulfur vulcanizing agents.
The monomers that make up the shell comprise the unterminated polymer chains left over from the polymerization of the liquid polymer.
In a variety of exemplary embodiments, the shell may be made up of any suitable conjugated diene or mixture thereof. C4-C8 1,3-conjugated diene monomers are the most preferred.
In a variety of exemplary embodiments, specific examples of the shell monomers include, but are not limited to, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene), cis- and trans-piperylene(1,3-pentadiene), 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, cis- and trans-1,3-hexadiene, cis- and trans-2-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, cis- and trans-3-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 4-methyl-1,3-pentadiene, 2,4-dimethyl-1,3-pentadiene, and the like, and the mixture thereof. In preferred embodiments, isoprene or 1,3-butadiene or mixture thereof is used as the shell monomer.
The crosslinked core of the nanoparticles is typically produced from mono-vinyl aromatic monomers cross-linked with multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers. The weight ratio between the mono-vinyl aromatic monomers and multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers may broadly range from about 95:5 to about 0:100, from about 90:10 to about 25:75, or from about 85:15 to about 60:40.
Compounds that comprise a conjugated vinyl group and a conjugated aromatic group may be used as the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer. Suitable mono-vinyl aromatic monomers include, but are not limited to styrene, ethylvinylbenzene, (X-methyl-styrene, 1-vinyl naphthalene, 2-vinyl naphthalene, vinyl toluene, methoxystyrene, t-butoxystyrene, and the like; as well as alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkaryl, and aralkyl derivatives thereof in which the total number of carbon atoms in the monomer is generally not greater than about 18; and mixtures thereof. In exemplified embodiments, the mono-vinyl aromatic monomer comprises styrene.
Any compound that comprises two or more conjugated vinyl groups and a conjugated aromatic group may be used as the multiple-vinyl aromatic monomer. Suitable multiple-vinyl aromatic monomers include, but are not limited to compounds with a general formula as shown below:
in which p is an integer and 2≦p≦6, preferably, p is 2 or 3, more preferably p is 2, i.e. di-vinyl-benzene (DVB).
The DVB may be selected from any one of the following isomers or any combination thereof:
The polymer nanoparticle synthesized in the one-batch methods described herein may take the shape of nano-spheres. The mean diameter of the spheres may be broadly within the range of from about 1 to about 200 nm, within the range of from about 5 nm to about 100 nm, within the range of from about 10 nm to about 80 nm, or within the range of from about 15 nm to about 70 nm.
The average molecular weight Mn of the poly(conjugated diene) block of the shell portion may be controlled within the range of from about 5,000 to about 500,000, or within the range of from about 5,000 to about 200,000, and most preferably within the range of from about 10,000 to about 100,000. The average molecular weight Mn of the uncrosslinked aromatic block may be controlled within the range of from about 5,000 to about 500,000, within the range of from about 5,000 to about 200,000, or within the range of from about 10,000 to about 100,000.
The number average molecular weight (Mn) of the entire polymer nano-particle may be controlled within the range of from about 10,000 to about 10,000,000, within the range of from about 50,000 to about 1,000,000, or within the range of from about 100,000 to about 500,000. The polydispersity (the ratio of the weight average molecular weight to the number average molecular weight) of the polymer nano-particle may be controlled within the range of from about 1 to about 1.5, within the range of from about 1 to about 1.3, or within the range of from about 1 to about 1.2.
The Mn may be determined by GPC with a polystyrene standard. The Mn values used in the examples below were measured by GPC methods calibrated with linear polymers.
In one example, the core of the synthesized nanoparticles is relatively hard. That is, the core has a Tg of about 60° C. or higher. In another example, the nanoparticles have a core that is relatively harder than the shell, for example, at least about 60° C. higher than the Tg of the shell layer. In one example, the shell layer is soft. That is, the shell layer has a Tg lower than about 0° C. Preferably, the Tg of the shell layer is between about 0° C. and about −70° C. Nanoparticles with hard cores and soft shells are particularly useful for reinforcing rubber compounds used for tire treads.
As known by those of skill in the art, the Tg of the polymers can be controlled by the selection of monomers and their molecular weight, styrene content, and vinyl content.
An illustrative composition comprising a liquid polymer/nanoparticle blend also includes (a) a rubber matrix, (b) an optional oil, and (c) one or more components selected from the group consisting of carbon black, silica, vulcanizing agent, vulcanization accelerator, tackifier resin, antioxidant, fatty acids, zinc oxide, wax, peptizer, vulcanization retarder, activator, processing additive, plasticizer, pigments, and antiozonant. Various rubber products such as tires and power belts may be manufactured based on this composition.
The nanoparticle and liquid polymer blend may be compounded with rubber by methods generally known in the rubber compounding art, such as mixing the rubbery matrix polymer and the nanoparticle/liquid polymer blend with conventional amounts of various commonly used additive materials, using standard rubber mixing equipment and procedures.
A vulcanized rubber product may be produced from the composition of the present invention by thermomechanically mixing the liquid polymer nanoparticle blend, a rubbery matrix polymer, and conventional amounts of various commonly used additive materials in a sequentially step-wise manner in a rubber mixer, followed by shaping and curing the composition. Rubber articles such as tires may be manufactured from the composition made with the liquid polymer/nanoparticle blend described supra. Reference for this purpose may be made to, for example, U.S. Publication No. 2004/0143064 A1, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
A rubbery matrix that the nanoparticle liquid polymer blend is used in may comprise any solution polymerizable or emulsion polymerizable elastomer, for example, diene homopolymers, and copolymers and terpolymers of conjugated diene monomers with vinyl aromatic monomers and trienes such as myrcene. Exemplary diene homopolymers are those prepared from diolefin monomers having from 4 to about 12 carbon atoms. Exemplary vinyl aromatic polymers are those prepared from monomers having from 8 to about 20 carbon atoms. Examples of such monomers may be referred to the monomers for the polymer nanoparticle formation as described supra. In certain exemplary embodiments, the conjugated diene monomer and vinyl aromatic monomer are normally used at the weight ratios of about 1:99 to about 99:1, or about 15:85 to about 85:15. The rubbery matrix can have 1,2-microstructure contents ranging from about 1 percent to about 99 percent, or polymers, copolymers or terpolymers having 1,2-microstructure content of from about 1 to 99 percent, based upon the diene content of the rubbery matrix. The copolymers are preferably random copolymers which result from simultaneous copolymerization of the monomers with randomizing agents, as is known in the art.
The rubber matrix may comprise any conventionally employed treadstock rubber such as natural rubber, synthetic rubber and blends thereof. Such rubbers are well known to those skilled in the art and include synthetic polyisoprene rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), styrene-isoprene-butadiene rubber, styrene-isoprene rubber, butadiene-isoprene rubber, polybutadiene, butyl rubber, neoprene, ethylene-propylene rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR), silicone rubber, the fluoroelastomers, ethylene acrylic rubber, ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), epichlorohydrin rubbers, chlorinated polyethylene rubbers, chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubbers, hydrogenated nitrile rubber, tetrafluoroethylene-propylene rubber, and the like, and the mixture thereof.
The amount of initiator employed will vary with the desired molecular weight of the rubbery matrix polymer being synthesized. Higher molecular weights are achieved by utilizing smaller quantities of the initiator and lower molecular weights are attained by employing larger quantities of the initiator. The molecular weight of the rubbery polymer produced is, of course, also dependent upon the amount of chain transfer agent, such as t-dodecyl mercaptan, present during the polymerization. For instance, low molecular weight rubbery polymers can be synthesized by simply increasing the level of chain transfer agent.
Oil has been conventionally used as a compounding aid in rubber compositions. Examples of oil include, but are not limited to, aromatic, naphthenic, and/or paraffinic processing oils. In some examples, it may be preferable to use low-polycyclic-aromatic (PCA) oils, particularly oils that have a PCA content of less than 3%. In a variety of exemplary embodiments, the liquid polymer portion of the blend described above is used along with the oil, is used to replace a portion of the oil, or is used to replace the entirety of the oil in a rubber compound. As such, a typical amount of oil may broadly range from about 0 phr to about 100 phr, from about 0 phr to about 70 phr, or from about greater than 0 phr to about 50 phr, based on 100 phr rubbery matrix in the rubber composition.
As a skilled artisan can appreciate, reinforcement of a rubber product may be reflected by a low strain dynamic modulus G′, as can be measured according to ASTM-D 412 at 22° C. In a variety of exemplary embodiments, reinforcement of rubber products such as tires made from the composition of the present invention may be achieved by (i) incorporation of the liquid polymer/nanoparticle blend; (ii) partially replacing the oil with the liquid polymer/nanoparticle blend; or (iii) entirely replacing the oil with the liquid polymer/nanoparticle blend.
The nanoparticle/liquid polymer blend provides various rubber products with improved reinforcement and controllable hysteresis. By controllable hysteresis, it is meant that the hysteresis is increased or decreased, or remains roughly unchanged, comparing to the situation where oil is present in the composition, but no liquid polymer and no polymer nanoparticles are included in the composition. For example, G′(MPa) may be increased at least about 0.3, preferably at least about 1.5, and more preferably at least 3.0.
The energy loss of an elastomer is termed hysteresis, which refers to the difference between the energy applied to deform an article made from the elastomer and the energy released as the elastomer returns to its initial and undeformed state. Hysteresis is characterized by a loss tangent, tangent delta (tan δ), which is a ratio of the loss modulus to the storage modulus (i.e., the viscous modulus to the elastic modulus) as measured under an imposed sinusoidal deformation. The tan δ value can be measured, for example, with a TA Instrument AIRES Rheometer.
Rubber products with improved reinforcement and suitable hysteresis may be manufactured with the nanoparticle/liquid polymer blend, in which the phr ratio between the component (a) liquid polymer and component (b) polymer nanoparticles is within the range of from about 1:99 to about 99:1, preferably within the range of from about 20:80 to about 80:20, more preferably within the range of from about 25:75 to about 40:60.
The illustrative rubber compositions described herein can be used for various purposes. For example, they can be used for various rubber compounds, such as a tire treadstock, sidewall stock or other tire component stock compounds. Such tires can be built, shaped, molded and cured by various methods that are known and will be readily apparent to those having skill in the art. In an embodiment, a molded unvulcanized tire is charged into a vulcanizing mold and then vulcanized to produce a tire, based on the composition and the procedure as described above.
The following examples are included to provide additional guidance to those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention. The examples provided are merely representative of the work that contributes to the teaching of the present application. Accordingly, these examples are not intended to limit the invention, as defined in the appended claims, in any manner.
A two-gallon jacketed reactor was used as the reaction vessel. The following ingredients were used: 19.3% butadiene in hexane, 33% styrene in hexane, hexane, n-butyl lithium (1.6 M), oligomeric oxalanyl propane (1.6 M) (OOPs), isopropanol, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and 80% divinylbenzene (DVB) purchased from Aldrich.
The reactor was sequentially charged with 4.96 lbs of hexane, 0.59 lbs of 33% styrene, and 3.58 lbs of 19.3% butadiene. This batch was heated to 120° F. over about 15 minutes. When the batch reached 117° F., 2.3 mL of n-butyl lithium (1.6 M) and 0.76 mL of OOPs (1.6 M), diluted with about 20 mL of hexane were added. The polymerization exothermed at 126.7° F. after three minutes of reaction. After one hour, the jacket of the reactor was set to 100° F. and 0.14 mL of isopropanol was added. After dropping a sample for analysis, some additional n-butyl lithium (2.3 mL) was added to the reactor. A mixture of 140.2 g styrene blend and 28.5 mL of DVB was prepared in a bottle and added to the reactor. The jacket temperature of the reactor was increased to 180° F. After three hours of reaction, the temperature was brought down to 90° F. and the mixture was dropped in isopropanol containing BHT. The resulting solid was then filtered through cheesecloth and drum dried.
The liquid polymer portion was determined to have an Mw of 73000 to 80000. The nanoparticle portion was determined to have a Mw of 83,700. The synthesized blend contained 55 wt % the liquid polymer and 45 wt % the nanoparticles, as determined by GPC.
The nanoparticle/liquid polymer blend was much easier to isolate from solvent and dry than previously known methods of separately synthesizing the liquid polymer. Coagulated liquid polymer is very difficult to separate from the solvent, the solvent must be carefully dropped out and it cannot easily be drum-dried. It may even be necessary to use a vacuum-oven to dry it, while being careful not to let the liquid polymer flow over. However, with a sufficent amount of nanoparticles in the liquid polymer blend, it produces a chunk of polymer after coagulation, which can be drum-dried very easily.
Three rubber compositions were prepared according to the formulation shown in Tables 1 and 2. The first example was a control that contained no nanoparticles or liquid polymer to serve as a comparison with the test compounds. The second example was made using synthesized nanoparticles to replace 10 phr of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) in the compound formulation. The third example was made using nanoparticles and liquid polymer to replace 10 phr of SBR and about 15 phr of aromatic oil. Because the synthesized MNP/LP blend contained 55 wt % of the liquid polymer and 45 wt % of the nanoparticles, 22.2 phr of the MNP/LP blend and 2.8 phr of additional LP were used in the formulation in order to correctly match the desired composition.
To illustrate that the additional amount of LP is not a necessary component of the examples described herein, a fourth prophetic example is also presented. In the prophetic example 4, 25 phr of 40:60 MNP/LP blend is used. This prophetic example replaces the 10 phr of SBR with 10 phr of blended MNP and replaces the 15 phr of LP with 15 phr of blended LP without using additional LP by itself.
1Trade Name HX263 from Firestone Polymers (Mw of 261 kg/mol, Mw/Mn of 2.30, 23.8% styrene by weight, 35% cis 1,4, 52% trans 1,4, and 13% 1,2 vinyl)
245% nanoparticles and 55% liquid polymer
340% nanoparticles and 60% liquid polymer
In each example, a blend of the ingredients was kneaded by the method listed in Table 3. The final stock was sheeted and molded at 165° C. for 15 minutes.
Measurement of the tensile strength and hysteresis loss were taken of the example vulcanized rubber compositions. The results are shown in Table 4. Measurement of tensile strength was performed according ASTM-D 412 at 22° C. The test specimen geometry was in the form of a ring of a width of 0.05 inches and of a thickness of 0.075 inches. The specimen was tested at a specific gauge length of 1.0 inch. Hysteresis loss was measured with a Dynastat Viscoelastic Analyzer set at a frequency of 1 Hz and 1% strain. The geometry of the specimen for this test was a cylinder of a length of 15 mm and a diameter of 10 mm.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in typical embodiments, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and substitutions can be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention. As such, further modifications and equivalents of the invention herein disclosed may occur to persons skilled in the art using no more than routine experimentation, and all such modifications and equivalents are believed to be within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2531396 | Carter et al. | Nov 1950 | A |
3598884 | Wei et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3793402 | Owens | Feb 1974 | A |
3840620 | Gallagher | Oct 1974 | A |
3972963 | Schwab et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4075186 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4233409 | Bulkley | Nov 1980 | A |
4247434 | Vanderhoff et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4248986 | Lal et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4326008 | Rembaum | Apr 1982 | A |
4386125 | Shiraki et al. | May 1983 | A |
4463129 | Shinada et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4471093 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4543403 | Isayama et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4598105 | Weber et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4602052 | Weber et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4659790 | Shimozato et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4717655 | Fulwyler | Jan 1988 | A |
4725522 | Breton et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4764572 | Bean, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4773521 | Chen | Sep 1988 | A |
4774189 | Schwartz | Sep 1988 | A |
4788254 | Kawakubo et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4829130 | Licchelli et al. | May 1989 | A |
4829135 | Gunesin et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837274 | Kawakubo et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837401 | Hirose et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4861131 | Bois et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870144 | Noda et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871814 | Gunesin et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4904730 | Moore et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4904732 | Iwahara et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906695 | Blizzard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4920160 | Chip et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4942209 | Gunesin | Jul 1990 | A |
4987202 | Zeigler | Jan 1991 | A |
5036138 | Stamhuis et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5066729 | Stayer, Jr. et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073498 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5075377 | Kawakubo et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5120379 | Noda et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130377 | Trepka et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5169914 | Kaszas et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5194300 | Cheung | Mar 1993 | A |
5219945 | Dicker et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227419 | Moczygemba et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237015 | Urban | Aug 1993 | A |
5241008 | Hall | Aug 1993 | A |
5247021 | Fujisawa et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5256736 | Trepka et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5262502 | Fujisawa et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290873 | Noda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290875 | Moczygemba et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290878 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296547 | Nestegard et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5329005 | Lawson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5331035 | Hall | Jul 1994 | A |
5336712 | Austgen, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5362794 | Inui et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5395891 | Obrecht et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5395902 | Hall | Mar 1995 | A |
5399628 | Moczygemba et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399629 | Coolbaugh et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405903 | Van Westrenen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5421866 | Stark-Kasley et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5436298 | Moczygemba et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438103 | DePorter et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447990 | Noda et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5462994 | Lo et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5514734 | Maxfield et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514753 | Ozawa et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521309 | Antkowiak et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525639 | Keneko et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527870 | Maeda et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530052 | Takekoshi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5580925 | Iwahara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587423 | Brandstetter et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594072 | Handlin, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5614579 | Roggeman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627252 | De La Croi Habimana | May 1997 | A |
5674592 | Clark et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5686528 | Wills et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688856 | Austgen, Jr. et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707439 | Takekoshi et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5728791 | Tamai et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733975 | Aoyama et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739267 | Fujisawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742118 | Endo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747152 | Oka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763551 | Wunsch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773521 | Hoxmeier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777037 | Yamanaka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5811501 | Chiba et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834563 | Kimura et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847054 | McKee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849847 | Quirk | Dec 1998 | A |
5855972 | Kaeding | Jan 1999 | A |
5883173 | Elspass et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891947 | Hall et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905116 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910530 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5955537 | Steininger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5986010 | Clites et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994468 | Wang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011116 | Aoyama et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020446 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025416 | Proebster et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025445 | Chiba et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6060549 | Li et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060559 | Feng et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087016 | Feeney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087456 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106953 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117932 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121379 | Yamanaka et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127488 | Obrecht et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147151 | Fukumoto et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166855 | Ikeyama et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180693 | Tang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191217 | Wang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197849 | Zilg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204354 | Wang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207263 | Takematsu et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225394 | Lan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252014 | Knauss | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255372 | Lin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268451 | Faust et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277304 | Wei et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6348546 | Hiiro et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6359075 | Wollum et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379791 | Cernohous et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383500 | Wooley et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395829 | Miyamoto et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6420486 | DePorter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437050 | Krom et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441090 | Demirors et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448353 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489378 | Sosa et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6524595 | Perrier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6550508 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6573313 | Li et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6573330 | Fujikake et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598645 | Larson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6649702 | Rapoport et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6663960 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689469 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693746 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706813 | Chiba et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706823 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727311 | Ajbani et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737486 | Wang | May 2004 | B2 |
6750297 | Yeu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759464 | Ajbani et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774185 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777500 | Lean et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780937 | Castner | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6835781 | Kondou et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858665 | Larson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861462 | Parker et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872785 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875818 | Wang | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908958 | Maruyama et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6956084 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7056840 | Miller et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071246 | Xie et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7112369 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7179864 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7193004 | Weydert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205370 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217775 | Castner | May 2007 | B2 |
7238751 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244783 | Lean et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7291394 | Winkler et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7347237 | Xie et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7408005 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20010053813 | Konno et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007011 | Konno et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045714 | Tomalia et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020095008 | Hemrich et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020144401 | Nogueroles Vines et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004250 | Ajbani et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032710 | Larson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030124353 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130401 | Lin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149185 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030198810 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225190 | Borbely et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040033345 | Dubertret et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059057 | Swisher et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091546 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127603 | Lean et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143064 | Wang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040198917 | Castner | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050101743 | Stacy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050182158 | Ziser et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192408 | Lin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197462 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203248 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215693 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228072 | Winkler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228074 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282956 | Bohm et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060084722 | Lin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173115 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173130 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235128 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070027264 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070135579 | Obrecht et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142550 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142559 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149649 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161754 | Bohm et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185273 | Hall et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196653 | Hall et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080145660 | Wang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149238 | Kleckner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160305 | Warren et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188579 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080286374 | Wang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080305336 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090048390 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054554 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090270558 | Gandon-pain et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100004398 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016472 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016512 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2127919 | Mar 1995 | CA |
3434983 | Apr 1986 | DE |
4241538 | Jun 1994 | DE |
0143500 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0255170 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0265142 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0265145 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0322905 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0352042 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0472344 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0540942 | May 1993 | EP |
0590491 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0742268 | Nov 1996 | EP |
1031605 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1099728 | May 2001 | EP |
1134251 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1273616 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1321489 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1783168 | May 2007 | EP |
2099645 | Mar 1972 | FR |
01279943 | Nov 1989 | JP |
2191619 | Jul 1990 | JP |
2196893 | Aug 1990 | JP |
05132605 | May 1993 | JP |
06248017 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7011043 | Jan 1995 | JP |
08199062 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2000-514791 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003-095640 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006-072283 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-106596 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-304409 | Nov 2007 | JP |
9104992 | Apr 1991 | WO |
9704029 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9704029 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9853000 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9853000 | Nov 1998 | WO |
0075226 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0187999 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0231002 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0241987 | May 2002 | WO |
02081233 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02100936 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03032061 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03085040 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2004058874 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006069793 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2008014464 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008079276 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008079807 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009006434 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090005491 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |