1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a one-sided mattress construction.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventional mattresses may employ spring coils to support the sleeping surface. There are two basic types of coils—open coils, which are usually joined together into a spring assembly using hog rings or other fasteners, and pocket coils, which usually present a fabric exterior than can be glued to adjacent coils to form a spring assembly.
In order to facilitate the manufacture of springs and the assembly of springs into a mattress, spring coils are generally made with an approximately cylindrical shape, sometimes with a slight taper at each end to give the spring a barrel-shaped appearance. This permits secure attachment of each spring along its side into a unitary spring assembly construction. This approach works well for two-sided mattresses.
More recently, mattress makers have started manufacturing one-sided mattresses, or more specifically, single-orientation mattresses, that are designed to be placed on a foundation and used in one position over the life of the mattress. The mattress user benefits from a construction that will perform consistently over many years without requiring rotation or flipping, and the manufacturer is able to more precisely design the sleeping surface for its intended orientation.
There are significant disadvantages to the use of convention spring coils with one-sided mattress constructions. Because the tops of each spring are adjacent to, and frequently attached to, one another, vertical motion of one coil may translate into vertical motion of adjacent coils and propagate across the entire sleeping surface. As another disadvantage, springs must be attached at a substantial number of points along abutting edges to prevent shifting of the springs under use.
There remains a need for an improved spring coil assembly for use with contemporary one-sided mattresses.
A one-sided mattress construction includes a spring assembly with asymmetric spring coils. Only the bottom portion of each spring coil is attached, either to adjacent spring coils or to a bottom surface of the mattress. The top portion of each spring may have a narrowing taper that permits the top to move independent of other adjacent springs.
The present disclosure may be better understood and its numerous features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings:
Described herein is a one-sided mattress using asymmetric spring coils. However, it will be appreciated that the principles described herein may be adapted to a wide range of applications where a cushion has a fixed orientation and one top surface for sitting or sleeping. For example, the principles of this disclosure may be applied to couches where a cushion is affixed to a larger assembly. More generally, the systems described herein may be usefully employed in any environment where it is desirable to reduce translation of vertical forces over a large, padded surface.
The mattress 100 may be a mattress of any size, including standard sizes such as a twin, queen, oversized queen, king, or California king sized mattress, as well as custom or non-standard sizes constructed to accommodate a particular user or a particular room.
The bottom 102 may be any rigid surface suitable for forming the bottom of a one-sided mattress construction. Where one or more of the springs 110 is to be attached directly to the bottom 102, the bottom 102 may be a material such as wood or a rigid plastic suitable for affixing the springs 110 with nails, staples, screws, or other hardware. The springs 110 may also, or instead, be adhered with an epoxy or other adhesive. The bottom 102 may include recesses shaped to securely receive each spring 110, or spring 110 and pocket 112 combination.
The upholstery 104 may be a quilted surface or any other exterior surface suitable for use with a mattress.
The one or more foam layers 106 may include any foam or other padding suitable for cushioning the sleeping surface during use. For example, visco-elastic foam toppers are commonly used in mattresses surfaces, and may have various thicknesses, densities, and Indentation Force Deflections (“IFD”). The one or more foam layers 106 may include a single, uniform foam piece, or a number of layers of foam, and may provide for different firmness and/or thickness in different regions of the sleeping surface.
The additional layers 108 may include any materials suitable for a mattress, such as batting, foam, waterproof liners, and so forth. In certain assemblies using asymmetric coils, the one or more additional layers 108 may include a relatively firm layer that distributes the upward force of each narrow spring top to provide a more uniform feel to the sleeping surface.
The plurality of springs 110 may have a generally asymmetric construction, as described in greater detail with reference to
Each spring 110 may be enclosed by a pocket 112 of fabric. It will be appreciated that pocket coils of this type may be manufactured in single pocket coils or strings of pocket coils, either of which may be suitably employed with the mattresses described herein. Although not depicted in
The attachment 114 between coils 110 may be any suitable attachment. For example, pocket coils are commonly attached to one another using hot-melt adhesive applied to abutting surfaces during construction. Other adhesives may be used. Open coils, on the other hand, are commonly attached to one another using hog rings or other metal clips. It will be noted from
The mattress 100 of
An asymmetric spring for use in a one-sided mattress is now described in greater detail.
A cross section of the outer surface 212, as depicted in
In general, the spring coil 200 should have a wide bottom portion 204 to provide secure attachment to the bottom 102 (
It will be appreciated that the narrowing taper provides certain advantages. As noted above, the physical separation of each top end may reduce the affect that compression of one spring has upon its neighbors. This translates into increased independence of vertical motion, and prevents compression in one region of the mattress from propagating across the mattress surface. Further, the physical separation may reduce the snagging that sometimes occurs among adjacent springs over the life of a mattress in which the spring ends become intertwined or hooked together. At the same time, the wider base may ensure a secure point of attachment to adjacent springs in a spring assembly.
The bottom end 208 and the top end 206 may include a turn in where the length of wire is turned into the interior of the outer surface 212. This reduces snagging of each spring on other springs or other materials within the interior of the mattress 100 (FIG. 1), as well as puncturing of mattress materials by the ends 206, 208.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, and therefore, the following claims are to be interpreted in the broadest sense allowable by law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
26954 | Peck, Jr. | Jan 1860 | A |
85938 | Kirkpatrick | Jan 1869 | A |
140975 | Van Wert et al. | Jul 1873 | A |
274715 | Buckley | Mar 1883 | A |
380651 | Fowler et al. | Apr 1888 | A |
485652 | Pfingst | Nov 1892 | A |
569256 | Van Cise | Oct 1896 | A |
1250892 | Johnson | Dec 1917 | A |
1751261 | Wilson | Mar 1930 | A |
2148961 | Pleet | Feb 1939 | A |
2480158 | Owen | Aug 1949 | A |
3751025 | Beery et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4003563 | Taylor | Jan 1977 | A |
4038711 | Golembeck | Aug 1977 | A |
4055337 | Laiche | Oct 1977 | A |
4077619 | Borlinghaus | Mar 1978 | A |
4111407 | Stager | Sep 1978 | A |
4449261 | Magnusson | May 1984 | A |
4548390 | Sasaki | Oct 1985 | A |
4664361 | Sasaki | May 1987 | A |
5652986 | Wells | Aug 1997 | A |
5713088 | Wagner et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5868383 | Codos | Feb 1999 | A |
6143122 | Mossbeck et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170807 | Eto | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173464 | McCune et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6256820 | Moser et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272706 | McCune | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318416 | Grueninger | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339857 | Clayton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6398199 | Barber | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6481701 | Kessen | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6540214 | Barber | Apr 2003 | B2 |
20020125623 | Kessen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
380582 | Sep 1932 | GB |
405261 | Jan 1934 | GB |
511661 | Aug 1939 | GB |
302064 | Jan 1937 | IT |
1733755 | May 1992 | RU |
1770633 | Oct 1992 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050055778 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |