This invention relates to the prevention of the fraudulent return of purchased goods. More specifically, this invention relates to the prevention of the return of garments which have been purchased, worn, and then returned to the store after having been worn.
Theft of goods in the retail environment is a serious concern. Theft cuts into the margins of a business making it more difficult for a business to compete and succeed. One type of theft is fraudulently returned garments. This type of theft involves purchasing a garment, perhaps a more expensive high end garment, and wearing it at least once. After the garment has been worn, it is fraudulently returned to the retail outlet where it was purchased. This allows the purchaser to get the good of the product without paying for it. This frequently occurs when a person purchases a more expensive article of clothing for a particular occasion, wears the garment, and then returns it.
Embodiments of the current invention entail a highly visible tag that can be attached to the garment at the store, but can easily be removed once the purchaser buys the garment and takes it home. Once the purchaser gets the garment home, they can remove it themselves and wear it. Once the tag is removed, it can not be reattached by the consumer. Depending on the store policy, the garment may not be returned, or there may be an extra fee for returning the garment, or other similar policies. The use of a tag makes it clear that the buyer has removed the tag and provides an indication that the garment has been worn in public.
In at least one embodiment the tag consists of an elongated plastic piece having a head and a lanyard extending from the head. The head has a relatively large flat face and a hub extending from behind the face. The face provides a large surface for a logo or for a statement about removal of the tag, etc. The hub tapers as it extends away from the face and is sized to be pressed through an aperture on garment such as a buttonhole. The hub has an aperture through it generally aligned with the lanyard and sized to accept the insertion of the lanyard.
The lanyard has several cleats along its length. When the free end of the lanyard is passed through the aperture in the hub and pulled, these cleats pass through the aperture as well and prevent the lanyard from being pulled back out of the aperture in the hub. A short distance along its length from the head, the lanyard has a tab and break lines formed along each side of the tab across the width of the lanyard. This tab and the break lines to each side of it facilitate the separation of the lanyard into sections. Pulling the tab separates the lanyard into a stub section still attached to the head and a tail section passing through the aperture. The tab section itself may also become separated from both of the other sections of lanyard. Once the lanyard is separated, the tag may pressed out of the aperture to allow the garment to be worn. If necessary the tail section of the lanyard may be pulled the rest of the way through the aperture in the hub of the head of the tag.
In some embodiments of the tag, the head will enclose an EAS device. The EAS device would interact with a larger EAS system to provide security and tracking functions. Due to size and cost factors, the EAS device would most likely be passive, but active EAS devices would also be possible. In some cases, the EAS device may actually be a dummy device which produces a rattle within the body of the tag to deceive would be thieves that an EAS device is housed in the tag. Of course, in the latter case the dummy device would not interact with the larger EAS system.
Additional utility and features of the invention will become more fully apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the following drawings, which illustrate some of the primary features of preferred embodiments.
In
As previously mentioned in the summary section, tag 10, may also have comprise EAS electronics. Returning to
It is to be understood that the embodiments and arrangements set forth herein are not limited in their application to the details of construction and arrangement of the components set forth in the description and illustrated in the drawings. Rather, the description and the drawings provide examples of the embodiments envisioned, but the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments. The embodiments disclosed herein are further capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways, including various combinations and sub-combinations that may not have been explicitly disclosed. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting the claims.
Accordingly, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which the application and claims are based may be readily utilized as a basis for the design of other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the embodiments and claims presented in this application. It is important, therefore, that the invention be regarded as including such equivalent constructions.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 61/767,147 filed on Feb. 20, 2013. The entirety of U.S. Provisional Application 61/767,147 including both the figures and specification are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708835 | Bienz | Jan 1973 | A |
4196424 | Williamson | Apr 1980 | A |
4263697 | Speedie | Apr 1981 | A |
4441233 | Swift | Apr 1984 | A |
4506415 | Swift | Mar 1985 | A |
4986457 | Faris | Jan 1991 | A |
5337503 | Goby | Aug 1994 | A |
5364141 | King | Nov 1994 | A |
5524463 | Schenkel et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5538289 | Cassis, III | Jul 1996 | A |
5568951 | Morgan | Oct 1996 | A |
5570080 | Inoue | Oct 1996 | A |
5627520 | Grubbs et al. | May 1997 | A |
5717382 | Cooper | Feb 1998 | A |
5856782 | Sasagawa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5945909 | Kolton | Aug 1999 | A |
5949336 | Deschenes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959532 | Fujiuchi | Sep 1999 | A |
5969613 | Yeager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979196 | Vanmoor | Nov 1999 | A |
5995003 | Rogers | Nov 1999 | A |
6025781 | Deschenes | Feb 2000 | A |
6052876 | Hogan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6188320 | Kolton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6326890 | Costa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6535130 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6624753 | Elston | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6724311 | Kolton et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731212 | Hirose | May 2004 | B2 |
D493739 | Copen | Aug 2004 | S |
D494487 | Sayegh | Aug 2004 | S |
D502419 | Copen | Mar 2005 | S |
D503900 | Sayegh | Apr 2005 | S |
D504634 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
D504839 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
D505349 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
6933847 | Feibelman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D509454 | Sayegh | Sep 2005 | S |
7062823 | Copen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7084764 | McHugh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7148805 | Hogan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7183914 | Norman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7227467 | Feibelman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249401 | Copen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286055 | Girvin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7311253 | Garner | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7342495 | Sayegh | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566598 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
D567128 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
D578030 | Yang | Oct 2008 | S |
7518521 | Feibelman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7595733 | Spagna | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626501 | Feibelman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7671741 | Lax et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724146 | Nguyen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7808390 | Sayegh | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7969310 | Sayegh | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8269632 | Hesch, Jr. et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20020154014 | Elston | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20080048030 | Garner | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090045258 | Sabeta | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090115615 | Bleckmann et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100050487 | Weightman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100315237 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120323807 | Sabeta | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140232545 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61767147 | Feb 2013 | US |