The present invention relates generally to data communication systems, and specifically to systems and methods for computer security.
In a computer network handling highly confidential data, such as data in military or financial environments, portions of the network may be connected by one-way data links. For example, confidential data that must not be accessed from external sites may be stored on a computer that is configured to receive data over a one-way link and has no physical outgoing link over which data might be transmitted to the external site.
One-way links may be implemented, for example, using Waterfall™ systems, which were manufactured by GITA Technologies, Ltd. (Rosh HaAyin, Israel) and are now manufactured by Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd. When a transmitting computer is connected by a Waterfall system or other one-way link to a receiving computer, the receiving computer can receive data from the transmitting computer but has no means of sending any return communications to the transmitting computer.
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods and devices for filtering data delivered to a computer over a one-way link.
In embodiments of the present invention, a physical path between a transmitting computer and a receiving computer is divided into portions comprising two or more one-way links. A device serving as a data security engine is placed between the one-way links.
The transmitting computer is configured to transmit data to the data security engine over a first one-way link. The data security engine may be configured to validate data by performing various security tests, such as testing that the data does not include viruses or other malicious software. The security tests may also include content filtering, which blocks certain types of content, as well as tests associated with content encapsulation, such as tests to authenticate the data source.
The data security engine typically buffers the data while performing the security tests. Once a set of data is validated, it is transmitted over a second one-way link to the receiving computer. Invalid data is rejected. Transmissions over the one-way links may be set to occur at designated times, such that transmissions do not occur over both the first and second one-way links at the same time.
For added security, switches, such as relays, may optionally be used to physically connect and disconnect each one-way link, thereby ensuring that at least one portion of the physical path is always disconnected. A switch controller may be configured to control the physical switches. The designated times for transmission over each of the one-way links may be established by predefined settings or, in further embodiments, by the transmission of special control signals to the switch controller from the data security engine, or, alternatively or additionally, from the transmitting computer, the receiving computer, or an external source. Physically switching each one-way link further impedes attacks against the receiving computer by hackers and by malicious software.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for secure communications between a transmitting computer and a receiving computer, the method including:
transmitting data from the transmitting computer over a first one-way link to a data security engine;
receiving and validating the data within the data security engine; and
after validating the data, transmitting the data from the data security engine to the receiving computer over a second one-way link.
Typically, transmitting the data over the first one-way link is performed during a first time period and transmitting the data over the second one-way link is performed during a second time period subsequent to and not overlapping the first time period. The first time period may be one of a sequence of time intervals that are defined in the transmitting computer and the data security engine prior to transmitting the data from the transmitting computer. Before the first time period, a first switch may be operated to connect the first one-way link and a second switch may be operated to disconnect the second one-way link; following the first time period, the first switch may be operated to disconnect the first one-way link; and before the second time period, the second switch may be operated to connect the second one-way link. Operating the first and second switches may include controlling the switches automatically using a switch controller. Automatic control may include sending a control signal from the data security engine to the switch controller. Alternatively or additionally, automatic control may include defining the first and second time periods in the switch controller prior to transmitting the data from the transmitting computer.
Validating the data may include determining that the data includes invalid content and rejecting the invalid content. In such an event, an alarm may also be issued.
Means of validating the data may include testing the data for malicious software, testing the data for inappropriate content, and authenticating a source of the data.
There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for secure communications between a transmitting computer and a receiving computer, the apparatus including:
a data security engine having a transmit port and a receive port and operative to receive data at the receive port, to validate the data, and to output the data after being validated at the transmit port;
a first one-way link operative to transmit the data from the transmitting computer to the receive port of the data security engine; and
a second one-way link operative to transmit the data from the transmit port of the data security engine to the receiving computer.
The transmitting computer may be operative to transmit the data over the first one-way link during a first time period, and the intermediate computer may be operative to transmit the data over the second one-way link during a second time period subsequent to and not overlapping the first time period. The first time period may be one of a sequence of time intervals, which are defined by settings in the transmitting computer and in the data security engine. A first switch may be operative to connect the first one-way link before the first time period and to disconnect the first one-way link following the first time period, and a second switch may be operative to disconnect the second one-way link before the first time period and to connect the second one-way link before the second time period. A switch controller may be configured to operate the first and second switches automatically. The switch controller may be coupled to receive a control signal from the data security engine defining the first and second time periods. Alternatively or additionally, the switch controller may be configured with predefined settings defining the first and second time periods.
The data security engine may be operative to determine that the data includes invalid content and to reject the invalid content. The data security engine may also be operative to issue an alarm responsively to determining that the data includes invalid content.
The data security engine may be operative to validate the data by means that include testing the data for malicious software, testing the data for inappropriate content and authenticating a source of the data.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
Transmitting computer 24 does not transmit this data directly to receiving computer 22 but instead transmits to an intermediate computer 26, which comprises a data security engine. Intermediate computer 26 may be a general-purpose or application-specific computer and is typically configured to run data security software described further hereinbelow. This software may be downloaded to the intermediate computer in electronic form, over a suitable communication link, or it may alternatively be provided on tangible media, such as optical, magnetic or electronic memory media. Intermediate computer 26 may buffer data received from transmitting computer 24 and subsequently may process the data using the security software to determine the data's validity.
Processing by the data security software may include determining that the received content does not comprise malicious software, such as a computer virus. Processing may also include verifying that the data conforms to pre-set protocols, which may refer to the form of encapsulation and/or the form of encryption. The security software may also authenticate the source of the data by testing, for example, a digital signature. The security software may also perform content filtering, wherein certain types of content, such as pornography, are flagged as invalid.
Following processing by the security software, intermediate computer 26 transmits validated data to the receiving computer.
The transmission of data from transmitting computer 24 to intermediate computer 26 is made over a leading-side one-way link 28. Similarly, the transmission of the validated data from intermediate computer 26 to receiving computer 22 is made over a rear-side one-way link 30. One-way links 28 and 30 may comprise any unidirectional transmission medium. For example, the unidirectional medium may be a cut RS-232 serial connection. The cut RS-232 serial connection provides only a ground wire and a wire from a transmit pin on the transmitting side of the connection to a receive pin on the receiving side, with no reverse path.
In an alternative configuration, the unidirectional medium for either or both of the one-way links may be a transmitter-receiver communications pair, such as the proprietary Waterfall system, described in the Background.
In one exemplary embodiment, a transmitter-receiver communications pair may comprise a transmitting device 32 and a receiving device 34. A connection between transmitting computer 24 and transmitting device 32 may be a standard Ethernet connection. Similarly, a connection between receiving device 34 and intermediate computer 26 may also be a standard Ethernet connection. Data to be transmitted from transmitting device 32 to receiving device 34 may be transmitted over a cut RS-232 connection, as described hereinabove, or may be communicated from an optical transmitter in the transmitting device to an optical sensor in the receiving device, thereby ensuring that there is no path of communications in the return direction.
Devices 32 and 34 are typically powered by a power source independent of the transmitted signal, such as lines power or battery power.
Processor 40 transmits data over leading-side one-way link 28 from a transmit port 46 to a receive port 54 on intermediate computer 26 (
Designated time periods are generally determined by specifying the interval of time, such as a period of seconds or minutes, during which data may be transmitted, and by specifying the subsequent interval during which data should not be transmitted. Alternatively, the designated time periods may be specified in other forms, such as by providing specific times on a daily or weekly basis, i.e., 10:00-11:00 a.m. daily, or by providing specific times and dates. Further alternatively, transmitting computer 24 and intermediate computer 26 may transmit asynchronously, at any desired times.
Intermediate computer 26, as indicated in
Intermediate computer 26 may be configured with a control port 58, through which processor 50 may send signals over a control line 60, as described further hereinbelow (
Receiving computer 22, as indicated in
Alternatively, for one-way links comprising optical connections, switches 90 and 92 may be implemented as optical switches. Optical switches known in the art include opto-mechanical, thermo-optic, and electro-optic switches.
Switch controller 82 uses control lines 84 and 86 to control the opening and closing of respective switches 90 and 92. Opening a switch disconnects the respective link; closing the switch connects the link.
Switch controller 82 may be implemented as a programmable logic controller (PLC), as a general purpose computer, or as any similarly configured computing device.
In some embodiments, switch controller 82 is programmed with the designated time settings used by transmitting computer 24 and by intermediate computer 26, as described above. During the time period designated for transmission over leading-side one-way link 28, switch controller 82 closes switch 90 and opens switch 92. During the time period designated for transmission over rear-side one-way link 30, switch controller 82 closes switch 92 and opens switch 90. Consequently, transmission is physically prevented from occurring simultaneously over both one-way links.
In a further embodiment, switch controller 82 may receive switch control signals from an external source, such as intermediate computer 26, which transmits such signals over control line 60. The switch control signals may alternatively be received from transmitting computer 24, or from receiving computer 22, or from another, independent device.
When switch controller 82 is configured to receive switch control signals, three signals are generally defined: a first signal to connect link 28 and disconnect link 30, a second signal to connect link 30 and disconnect link 28, and a third signal to disconnect both links. The timing of these signals may be determined by a switching mode message originating from transmitting computer 24 and defining the transmission time period of a given transmission. Typically this message is delivered to intermediate computer 26. The intermediate computer may then send switch control messages to switch controller 82 based on the transmission time periods set in the switching mode message. The intermediate computer may also send a version of the switch control message to receiving computer 22, thereby notifying receiving computer 22 of the intended time period for a given transmission.
Thus, switch controller 82 may operate in two modes: a timed mode, in which switch control is determined by preset time settings; and an external control mode, in which switch control is determined by control signals received from an external source, such as the intermediate computer. The switch controller may also be configured to operate in a timed mode with an external control mode override. Operation according to these modes is described further hereinbelow.
Methods for implementing the functions of relay board 94 in software on a general-purpose computer will also be apparent to one skilled in the art.
Transmitting computer 24 is typically configured to begin transmission at a time that is synchronized with the closure of switch 90. This transmission occurs as indicated at a step 106. During the transmission, transmitting computer 24 may also send a switching mode message to intermediate computer 26 establishing the time duration of the transmission.
In parallel or subsequent to the transmission of step 106, intermediate computer 26 performs, at a step 108, operations to validate the content of the transferred data. These operations, described above with reference to
If the data content is validated, then, at a step 114, switch controller 82 connects the rear-side one-way link by closing switch 92 at a step 114. To ensure that transmission does not occur simultaneously on both one-way links, the switch controller also opens switch 90.
If switch controller 82 operates in a timed mode, then step 114 is initiated when a designated time is reached. Alternatively, when switch controller operates in an external control mode, step 114 is initiated when a control signal is received by switch controller 82 from intermediate computer 26.
Subsequently, at a step 116, intermediate computer 26 transmits the validated data to receiving computer 22. When the designated time period for the transmission has elapsed (either according to the timed mode or external control mode), switch controller opens switch 92 at a step 118. In external control mode, the control signal to open both switch 90 and switch 92 is sent at step 118. Alternatively, step 118 may be skipped, and process 100 may continue at step 104, with the closure of switch 90 and the simultaneous opening of switch 92.
Although the embodiments described above use two one-way links with a single intermediate computer, in alternative embodiments (not shown in the figures), three or more one-way links may be connected in series with multiple intermediate computers.
Furthermore, although the embodiments described above relate specifically to certain types of security functions that are applied to content transmitted over a one-way link, additional types of data processing may be performed at an intermediate point on a one-way link, according to the principles of the present invention. The principles of the present invention may likewise be applied in the context of other environments and other communications technologies.
It will thus be appreciated that embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/816,924, filed on Jun. 26, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2006/001499 | 12/28/2006 | WO | 00 | 12/25/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/001344 | 1/3/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3377541 | Farkas | Apr 1968 | A |
4163289 | Schmidt | Jul 1979 | A |
4213177 | Schmidt | Jul 1980 | A |
4214302 | Schmidt | Jul 1980 | A |
4375665 | Schmidt | Mar 1983 | A |
4964046 | Mehrgardt et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985919 | Naruse et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987595 | Marino, Jr. et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5140681 | Uchiyama et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163138 | Thirumalai | Nov 1992 | A |
5185877 | Bissett et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5289478 | Barlow et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5530758 | Marino, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548646 | Aziz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5677952 | Blakley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696822 | Nachenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5732278 | Furber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748871 | DuLac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5829046 | Tzelnic et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835726 | Shwed et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5940507 | Cane et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946399 | Kitaj et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995628 | Kitaj et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6023570 | Tang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026502 | Wakayama | Feb 2000 | A |
6049611 | Tatebayashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6167459 | Beardsley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170023 | Beardsley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185638 | Beardsley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202095 | Beardsley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240514 | Inoue et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289377 | Lalwaney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317831 | King | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356546 | Beshai | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6467009 | Winegarden et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470449 | Blandford | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6574640 | Stahl | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601126 | Zaidi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615244 | Singhal | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640308 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643701 | Aziz et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6738388 | Stevenson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754185 | Banerjee et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6820110 | Engel et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6862663 | Bateman | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6915369 | Dao et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6915435 | Merriam | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6931549 | Ananda | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957330 | Hughes | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963817 | Ito et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966001 | Obara et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6986061 | Kunzinger | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7031322 | Matsuo | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7062587 | Zaidi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7143289 | Denning et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7171566 | Durrant | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7200693 | Jeddeloh | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7254663 | Bartley et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260833 | Schaeffer | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7324515 | Chapman | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7366894 | Kallimuthu et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7469311 | Tsu et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7509141 | Koenck et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7631189 | Ichinose et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660959 | Asher et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675867 | Mraz et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7685436 | Davis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685636 | Leake et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698470 | Ruckerbauer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716467 | Deffet et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7757074 | Sundarrajan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761529 | Choubal et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761704 | Ho et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792300 | Caronni | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7814316 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7815548 | Barre et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845011 | Hirai | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849330 | Osaki | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7992209 | Menoher et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8041832 | Hughes et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046443 | Parker et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010033332 | Kato et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020065775 | Monaghan | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066018 | Linnartz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083120 | Soltis | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020114453 | Bartholet et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178370 | Gurevich et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186839 | Parker | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191866 | Tanabe | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199181 | Allen | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030037247 | Obara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039354 | Kimble et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055792 | Kinoshita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061505 | Sperry et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030114204 | Allen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140090 | Rezvani et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140239 | Kuroiwa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159029 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030188102 | Nagasoe et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200460 | Morota et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212845 | Court et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217262 | Kawai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040022107 | Zaidi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070620 | Fujisawa | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040071311 | Choi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080615 | Klein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040175123 | Lim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217890 | Woodward et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247308 | Kawade | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015624 | Ginter et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033990 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060693 | Robison et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085964 | Knapp et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091173 | Alve | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119967 | Ishiguro et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120251 | Fukumori et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122930 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138369 | Lebovitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165939 | Nikunen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050216648 | Jeddeloh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264415 | Katz | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270840 | Kudelski | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060026292 | Namioka et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047887 | Jeddeloh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064550 | Katsuragi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085354 | Hirai | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085534 | Ralston et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095629 | Gower et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136724 | Takeshima et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165108 | Uysal | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165347 | Mita | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179208 | Jeddeloh | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195704 | Cochran et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060220903 | Zigdon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224848 | Matulik et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248582 | Panjwani et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259431 | Poisner | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271617 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288010 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294295 | Fukuzo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070028027 | Janzen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070028134 | Gammel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043769 | Kasahara et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055814 | Jeddeloh | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063866 | Webb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112863 | Niwata et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070174362 | Pham et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192608 | De Arruda Villela | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203970 | Nguyen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204140 | Shade | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070283297 | Hein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005325 | Wynn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008207 | Kellum | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080066192 | Greco et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082835 | Asher et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080155273 | Conti | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080244743 | Largman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090002150 | Zilberstein et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019325 | Miyamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110107023 | McCallister et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110213990 | Poisner | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130024700 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130152206 | Staubly | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130297935 | Oswalt | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140007194 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020109 | Mraz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040679 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140122965 | Zeng et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1632833 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2371125 | Jul 2002 | GB |
0163879 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2008001344 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008026212 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008087640 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009004611 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009053990 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Einey, D., “Waterfall IP Surveillance Enalber”, Jul. 2007. |
Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd., “Waterfall One Way Link Technology”, 2008 http://www.waterfall-solutions.com/home/Waterfall—Technology.aspx. |
Multi-State Information Sharing Analysis Center (MSISAC), “Cyber Security Procurement Language for Control Systems”, version 1.8, revision 3, Feb. 2008 http://www.msisac.org/scada/documents/4march08scadaprocure.pdf. |
International Application PCT/IL2008/000886 Search Report dated Nov. 13, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IL2008/000070 Search Report dated Jun. 16, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IL2007/001070 Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2008. |
Axis Communications., “Axis Network Cameras”, 2008 http://www.axis.com/products/video/camera/index.htm. |
International Application PCT/IL2006/001499 Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2008. |
International Application PCT/IL2006/001499 Patentability Report dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
International Application PCT/IL2007/001070 Patentability Report dated Mar. 16, 2009. |
International Application PCT/IL2008/001513 Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2009. |
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., “Extended Unified Threat Management capabilities with new multi-layer messaging security deliver best all-inclusive security solution”, USA, Nov. 18, 2008 http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2008/utm-1-edge-upgrade-111808.html. |
Innominate Security Technologies, “Press Release: Innominate joins Industrial Defender Enabled Partner Program”, Germany, Apr. 14, 2008 http://www.innominate.com/content/view/288/120/lang,en/. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/823,950 Official Action dated Jun. 22, 2009. |
IL Patent Application # 177,756 Official Action dated Aug. 17, 2010. |
IL Patent Application # 180,748 Official Action dated Oct. 25, 2010. |
Israel Patent Application # 201473 Official Action dated May 8, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/977,391 Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2011. |
Frenkel, L., “Unidirectional Information Transfer”, Web issue, Jun. 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/447,470 Official Action dated Mar. 25, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/447,470 Official Action dated Sep. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/447,470 Official Action dated Feb. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2012. |
European Patent Application # 07805530.8 Search report dated Mar. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/438,548 Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2013. |
Schneier, B., “Applied Cryptography”, Chapter 15, pp. 357-358, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc, year 1996. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,265, filed Jun. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/447,470 Official Action dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
EP Patent Application # 08702651.4 Search report dated May 11, 2012. |
Israel Patent Application # 196088 Official Action dated May 13, 2012. |
Amrami, D., “Transfer of mail and files between networks with different security classification”, Security Outlook 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,265 Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
EP Patent Application # 13182696.8 Search Report dated Apr. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/487,265 Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2013. |
EP Patent Application No. 06832267.6 Search Report dated Jun. 3, 2014. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Separate Write/Read Logical Paths to Optimize Library Network File System Data Rates, vol. 37, No. 09, pp. 1-3, Sep. 1994 |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/248,419 Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,677 Office Action Dated Aug. 13, 2014. |
EP Patent Application # 14162141.7 Search Report dated Jun. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,677 Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/867,145 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016. |
IEEE Standards Information Network, “The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Terms”, IEEE Press, 7th Edition, p. 1154, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,708 Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/867,145 Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,677 Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090328183 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60816924 | Jun 2006 | US |