The present invention relates to a new self-service portal that enables publishers to name their own CPM (Cost Per Thousand) AskPrice™ and advertisers to target campaigns to content categories that match their desired audience's interests. Further, techniques are presented for allowing publishers of advertisements to still realize revenue when the exchange cannot sell an impression at an AskPrice™ by sending that impression to a backup tag.
Standard producers of online ad-request inventory are publishers. They own or operate web sites that users visit using web browsers, and they allocate space on those pages where advertisements may be added. Consumers of online ad-request inventory are Advertisers. They offer products or services online, and they create advertisements for those offerings which they desire to show to Internet users. Those advertisements are then added into the publishers' pages so that users see them as they browse. Each time an individual user browses to a publishers' page that contains pre-allocated space for advertising, an Ad Request to deliver an ad to fill that allocated space can be made to an Ad Server either by the user's browser or by the Publisher.
Publishers are able to predict in advance approximately how many times in a given day or month a user will browse (or request to view) one of the pages on their site. By combining this prediction with the knowledge of which page spaces have been set aside for advertisements, Publishers can estimate how many advertisements will be shown to users visiting their site in a given period of time. Because Publishers are paid for allowing parts of their pages to be filled with advertisements, this estimate of future ads to be shown may be considered an asset owned by that Publisher. As with any other asset, this asset can be sold to advertisers or their agents. The asset can be called an Ad Request Inventory or Ad Media. Advertisers and/or their agents who buy this inventory may be called media buyers. Publishers and/or their agents who sell this inventory may be called media sellers.
When the Ad Media is considered in terms of the number of expected ad requests, the inventory is typically quantified as a particular number of Ad Impressions. Ad Impressions are priced as a Cost-Per-Thousand Impressions (“CPM”). Additionally, because a click may or may not result each time an ad is shown to a user, inventory may also be quantified as a particular number of expected Ad Clicks, and could be priced as a Cost-Per-Click (“CPC”).
Prior to buying ad media, media buyers place their advertisements into a specialized system called an Ad Server. An Ad Server selectively delivers one or more of the ads placed by the media buyer in response to requests made to the Ad Server. The Ad Server provides the Media Buyer with a small piece of industry-standard software called an Ad Tag. Upon its execution, the Ad Tag sends a request to the ad server to deliver one or more of the media buyer's ads.
When media buyers buy ad media they often provide the same Ad Tag, or a slightly modified version, to the media seller. The media seller assures that the Ad Tag is executed according to the contracted terms of the sale, i.e., locations, quantity, and other parameters. Among these contracted terms is a categorization of the pages where the ads are to be shown. Categorization allows media buyers to buy media across a group of Publishers on the basis of a number of impressions, or clicks, in particular category or categories. For example, a bank wishing to advertise its mortgage programs can restrict its ads to be shown only on pages categorized as Finance-related, or Home Finance-related. Targeting an ad placement in this manner allows media buyers to spend ad budgets more efficiently. Also media is not wasted showing unrelated ads.
The ability to buy and sell media by category is a feature of the current online advertising market. Categorization adds value, and makes it possible for media sellers to demand higher prices (e.g., CPM or CPC). The demand for well categorized media implies demand for scalable categorization processes. Prior art processes include both manual and automated approaches. A manual approach has human editors reviewing publishers' sites to categorize the whole site, either to a particular category, or to categorize different areas of the site to various different categories. This process can easily become labor intensive requiring a large number of human editors. This approach quickly becomes untenable on pages that contain dynamic content—e.g., online newspapers where stories might be different subjects on different days. For dynamic content, human editors cannot logistically keep up with re-reading these pages' content and changing their categorization decisions.
U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002-0123912-A1, titled “Internet Contextual Communication System” to Subramanian et al., automates approaches for media categorization that are more scalable for both static content and dynamic content situations. However, even with effective automated categorization systems, the burden remains on media sellers to choose among the available automated and manual approaches. This choice results in the presence of a confusing mix of approaches in the advertising market. Therefore, further increasing the burden on media buyers to work with a multitude of approaches and manage quantities of inventory bought from each seller in each model. U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002-0123912-A1 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Another problem present in the prior art models affects the media buyers' experience in monitoring the performance of their media buys. In order to monitor the effectiveness of their media buys, media buyers receive regular reports on the number of ad impressions and/or clicks delivered each day, month, etc. However, for media buys that are not site specific, media sellers rarely if ever report which particular Publishers' sites ran the media buyer's ads. Oftentimes within a media-buy there are some Publishers' sites where the ads are effective, and some sites where the ads are ineffective. Similarly within an uncategorized or run-of-network media-buy there will often be one or more categories that are effective and one or more that are ineffective. Even within a categorized media-buy there will often be one or more sub-categories that are relatively effective, and one or more that are relatively ineffective. However, media buyers have no mechanism to determine which part of their buys are the effective parts. Additionally, even if the effective buy parts are known, media buyers can not act on that knowledge because media often cannot be bought at the next level of granularity (e.g., sub-category level or site-specific).
Missing from the art is a mechanism to create a standardized marketplace where parties can meet to buy and sell media according to free-market prices and a standard categorization approach. The present invention can satisfy one or more of these and other needs.
For as better understanding of the nature, objects, and processes involved in this invention, reference should be made to the detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
By way of overview and introduction, presented and described are embodiments of a method and system that brings Advertisers and Publishers together to buy, sell, and manage ad media; as well as manage categorization and delivery of ad requests according to specifications provided by the owning parties.
A system,
An online media exchange and method comprising:
an exchange system configured to provide a user interface to advertisers and publishers accessing the online media exchange;
a publisher to sell ad spots;
an advertiser with ad campaigns;
receiving from one or more advertisers data defining bids to purchase advertising media; receiving from one or more publishers data defining offers to sell advertising media;
matching bid to purchase of a contracting advertiser with an offer to sell of respective contracting publishers to form respective contracts;
serving advertising content including advertising media defined by the contract to consumers accessing websites of the respective publishers; and
passing back the untargetable or unclassifiable ad media when a match is not able to be made to one or more backup ad networks designated by the publisher.
The online media exchange can be a computer system comprising:
an internet server configured to provide a user interface to advertisers and publishers accessing the online media exchange;
one or more application servers configured to manage data objects associated with respective advertisers and publishers and further configured to manage online negotiations between advertisers and publishers regarding placement of advertiser ads on publisher websites;
a database in communication with the one or more application servers, the database storing data including the data objects;
and one or more ad servers in communication with the database, the one or more ad servers configured to serve data defining advertiser ads to publisher websites.
The online media exchange may optionally include one or more application servers configured to manage data objects associated with respective advertisers and publishers and further configured to manage online negotiations between advertisers and publishers regarding placement of advertiser ads on publisher websites. The online media exchange may also optionally include and one or more ad servers in communication with the database, the one or more ad servers configured to serve data defining advertiser ads to publisher websites.
Another novel aspect of the present invention is the ability to pass back the untargetable or unclassifiable ad media when a match is not able to be made. This ensures that the publisher always receive their asking price, never less than that amount. For instance, if no ads are available at the CPM asking price, then the exchange will send the ad impression to one or more backup ad networks designated by the publisher. Furthermore, there is compatibility with a publisher's existing advertising networks and thus no need for exclusivity. When an advertiser on the exchange cannot deliver the asking price, the exchange will serve ads from the publisher's other designated advertising networks. This always guarantees a better result than ad network alternatives because the publisher sets the asking price and thus set the price of their inventory. They will enjoy a 10-20% higher payout than ad networks are currently paying the publisher because the publisher gets control of their pricing. Furthermore, this feature provides better management of ad trafficking and smart decisions about when to serve the highest paying advertiser.
Beyond being a marketplace for buying and/or selling media and managing owned media, the system 200 also includes a delivery aspect. The exchange technology converts publisher impressions into standardized Contextual Tradable Units™ (CTUs) in real-time. Advertisers can purchase impressions from one or more of the exchange's 344 categories. Thus, the system brokers ad requests generated by media transacted on the marketplace platform by performing real-time categorization of each request. By brokering the request, the system identifies the media buyer who owns the ad request and associates the appropriate Ad Tag (i.e., the Ad Tag registered in the system to that media buyer). This association by the system results in the ad request being routed to the media buyer's desired Ad Server.
Different embodiments interrelate the following elements:
Other embodiments and implementations of the market accesor tool, consistent with the purpose of empowering users (e.g., traders and other actors in the marketplace) to transact business in the marketplace and to carry out other management and analysis activities related to the marketplace, are within the scope and spirit of the invention. Activities related to the herein described online exchange include, but are not limited to:
Thus, while there have been shown, described, and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to several embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the illustrated embodiments, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Substitutions of elements from one embodiment to another are also fully intended and contemplated. The invention is defined solely with regard to the claims appended hereto, and equivalents of the recitations therein.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/627,902, which was filed on Jan. 26, 2007 and claims the benefit of priority, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/762,980, filed Jan. 26, 2006, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60762980 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11627901 | Jan 2007 | US |
| Child | 11933187 | US |