This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/421,535, filed Dec. 9, 2010, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
This invention generally relates to computer network systems, and more particularly, to monitoring and detecting online accounts and online activities of minors by their parents and guardians.
Software solutions to help parents monitor their children's online accounts, participation in social networks, and other online activity can be categorized into two groups: native solutions and cloud-based solutions. Native solutions generally rely on software agents that are downloaded and installed locally on a computer, router, or other local node through which Internet traffic passes, the Internet traffic is monitored as it passes through. Native solutions can monitor this traffic for photos, text, friend requests, visited sites, and any other online activity that parents would be curious about. Cloud-based solutions are not installed locally, but rather monitor a child's activity by accessing the contents of the child's account and activity stream via network-based communication with the relevant sites and services, for example making use of the fact that many online sites expose application programming interfaces (“APIs”) to developers for this very purpose.
There are strengths and weaknesses to each approach. The native solution is very proficient at capturing all traffic that passes through it. However, the native solution is blind to traffic and activity that occurs elsewhere on the Internet. This is especially noticeable as children increasingly have access to the Internet from phones, computers at school, friends' houses, and other non-traditional access points that a parent might not be able to access for the purpose of installing software. In contrast, a cloud-based approach can work consistently no matter where a child is accessing the Internet from. However, a major weakness of cloud-based solutions is that their initial setup usually requires the parent to initially identity the child on any social networking accounts of interest. Services exist which discover a child's accounts based on an identifier like an email address, but these services are imperfect and still require the parent to correctly initiate the system with the child's email address. Furthermore, once an online account is identified, cloud-based solutions often need some form of cooperation from the child such as either their login credentials or permission to access their account via a social networking site's platform. Permission is necessary to access the contents of the child's account and the full extent of his or her online activity.
What is needed is a method for monitoring minors' online activities in a more efficient and less cumbersome manner.
An embodiment according to the within invention comprises a computer implemented method that comprises providing an online-monitoring agent configured for local monitoring of a personal computing device, receiving identifying information associated with at least one of an account, email address, site, and service from the personal computing device via the online-monitoring agent, and monitoring via a network the at least one of the account, email address, site, and service based on the identifying information received via the online-monitoring agent.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the personal computing device includes at least one of a laptop, personal computer, smart-phone, router or other internet enabled device.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the online-monitoring agent includes at least one of native software and cloud-based software.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the native software includes at least one of at least one of a key-logger, peer-to-peer processor, remote redirection agent, and hyper text transfer protocol secure down-grader.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the cloud-based software includes at least one of a collection server, a poller server, a proxy server and obfuscation-system.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the hyper text transfer protocol secure down-grader comprises removing an automatic redirect if a targeted application server executes a HTTP redirect process, accessing the targeted application server website directly such that at least one website page and user information can be intercepted, rewriting the intercepted at least one website page and user information to retain a connection using HTTP.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that rewriting intercepted website pages and user information further includes at least one of rewriting POST uniform resource locators in a form to be HTTP instead of HTTPS, rewriting link uniform resource locators in pages to be HTTP instead of HTTPS, changing a HTTP BASE HREF to be HTTP instead of HTTPS and rewriting rules to circumvent specific website protections for websites having website specific login procedures.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the HTTPS-down-grader further comprises the steps of tracking a uniform resource locator of each element that is down-graded, whether the down-grade occurred via handling redirects or by rewriting website page contents and storing the uniform resource locator into a uniform resource locator list.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that a proxy is configured for accessing a uniform resource locator list to determine if an outgoing connection to a targeted application server website should use HTTP or HTTPS to meet the security requirements of the targeted site such that when the uniform resource locator list indicates a HTTP level of security, the proxy server will access the targeted application server website via HTTP or when the uniform resource locator list indicates a HTTPS level of security, the proxy server will access the targeted application server website via HTTPS.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the HTTPS-down-grader comprises sending intercepted at least one web page and user information from the down-grader to HTTP sessions, to the collection server.
Another embodiment according to the present invention further comprises that the intercepted user information includes at least one of usernames, passwords, e-mail addresses and uniform resource locators.
The above and yet other objects and advantages of the within invention will become apparent from the hereinafter set forth Brief Description of the Drawings, Detailed Description of the Invention, and Claims appended herewith.
The foregoing Summary as well as the following detailed description will be readily understood in conjunction with the appended drawings which illustrate embodiments of the invention. In the drawings:
Another embodiment according to the invention comprises using the online-monitoring agent to obtain a minor's login credentials, so that those credentials can be fed back to a cloud-based system to enable direct access to the minor's online content and activity stream, without requiring direct participation or cooperation from the minor.
Another embodiment according to the present invention comprises an obfuscation-system that can generate alternate Internet protocol (“IP”) addresses. The obfuscation-system can be used when a targeted application server has filters to prevent large numbers of connections for different users from a single IP address. The obfuscation-system will allow a system's hosted servers such as the collection server and poller server to originate connections to the targeted application server using the IP address of the minor's personal computing device. The obfuscation-system can handle connections for that specific minor or any number of other minors whose IP addresses are in a nearby network IP address block that is close to the minor's IP address.
Another embodiment according to the within invention comprises installing a HTTPS-down-grader in a proxy or on a residential gateway. The HTTPS-down-grader can function as a standard HTTP proxy configured by a user or the HTTPS-down-grader can function as a transparent proxy by intercepting traffic as it flows to a target site. A function of the HTTPS-down-grader is to process HTTPS connections to be down-graded to HTTP such that traffic can be monitored for usernames, passwords and other information such as web mail service, email addresses, and other user information that can be useful to have for monitoring the minor. Connections leaving the proxy destined for a targeted application server would still be encrypted via HTTPS if the original connection that was HTTPS-down-graded, was intended to be secure.
The online-monitoring agent 302 or 303 collects and sends data to a collection server 304. The collection server 304 functions as a repository for a minor's electronic information such as usernames, device identifiers, email addresses and passwords. The collection server 304 is periodically polled for new and updated information by a poller server 305. A proxy server 306 including an HTTPS-down-grader interacts with browser access from a home browser 307, enabled for example by the personal computing device 301, or a mobile-browser 308, enabled for example by a smart-phone 320 operated by the minor targeted to a particular application server 309, to render accessible the minor's electronic user information to the collection server 304. The minor's user information can be collected for example during the minor's browser interactions with a social networking application (e.g. Twitter™, Facebook™) via a particular social networking application server 309. Alternatively for example, the minor's user information can be collected during interactions with a third party application (e.g. TweetDeck™, Plume™) which provides an alternate interface to the social networking application for example through an alternate application server configured for communication with the particular social networking application server 309.
The poller server 305 accesses information regarding a monitored minor from the social networking application servers 309, for example using user names, passwords or other user information provided by the collection server 304. The poller server 305 is configured to access information related to or inputted by a monitored minor on an application server 309 regardless of whether the information originates from the personal computing device 301, the home browser 307 executed on the device 301, the user mobile browser 308, or a foreign browser 310. The foreign browser 310, enabled for example by a foreign personal computing device 322, is a browser on an unrecognized system which can include for example a browser accessed by the minor residing on the minor's friend's computer, a public computer or other unrecognized system. The poller server 305 can access a minor's information on an application server 309 for example through connection to a publically accessible web interface, by logging on to the minor's social networking application account, or via an API exposed for the purpose of user monitoring. Alternatively, the online monitoring agent 302 or 303 can perform the functions of the poller server 305, connecting to the social networking application servers 309.
The poller server 305, or alternatively the online monitoring agent 302 or 303, provides status updates to monitoring users such as parents of a monitored minor at predetermined intervals or responsive to predetermined events. A monitoring user client 312, implemented for example on a suitable personal computing device 324, can interface with the poller server 305 and/or the online monitoring agent 302 or 303 to receive status updates regarding the minor's online activities. The status updates can include for example descriptions of postings by the minor or the minor's friends on particular social networking sites, indications of whether particular social networking sites are accessed by a device known by the poller server 305 and/or the online monitoring agent 302 or 303, and the times of such accesses. A status update can include an indication of an IP address from which a posting originated, or alternatively a geographic location from which a posting originated if the device from which the posting originated is location-enabled, for example a GPS-enabled smart phone.
If information extracted by the poller server 305 or the online monitoring agent 302 or 303 from a social networking application server 309 is determined not to correspond to activity of recognized systems recorded by the online monitoring agent 302 or 303 or the collection server 304, the status provided to the monitoring user client 312 can include an indication that a posting originated from an unknown device (i.e. foreign system). Alternatively, such status can be provided responsive to a determination that extracted information includes information corresponding to a system not recognized as associated with the monitored minor. The online monitoring agent 302 or 303 and/or the poller server 305 preferably maintain a listing of known devices corresponding to the minor for making such determination. The status provided to the monitoring user client 312 can include for example a statement such as “your child appears to be accessing Facebook™ from a device other than your home PC or his mobile phone” or “your child accessed Twitter™ from an unknown system at 4:00 pm”.
If it is determined that the posting originated from an unknown device, for example the foreign personal computing device 322, the collection server 304 can query the location of a location-enabled mobile device known to be associated with the monitored minor, for example the smart phone 320. The collection server 304 can query the location of the location-enabled mobile device 320 directly or via a request to a telecommunication carrier location infrastructure 326. The collection server 304, or alternatively the online monitoring agent 302 or 303, provides a status to the monitoring user client 312 indicating that a particular social networking application was accessed by an unknown system at a particular time at a particular location. The status provided to the monitoring user client 312 can include for example a statement such as “your child accessed Twitter™ from an unknown system at 4:00 pm at or near 924 Spruce Street”, or “your child accessed Facebook™ from an unknown system at 12:30 pm at or near Northern Public Library.”
Some application servers have filters to prevent large numbers of connections for different users from a single IP address. An obfuscation-system 311 allows a system's hosted servers such as the collection server 304 and poller server 305 to originate connections to the targeted application server using the IP address of the minor's personal computing device. The obfuscation-system 311 can handle connections for that specific minor or any number of other minors whose IP addresses are in a nearby network IP address block that is associated with the minor's IP address. When necessary the obfuscation-system 311 can generate alternate IP addresses using a peer to peer process or any other system process suitable for generating IP addresses.
The collection server 304, poller server 305, proxy server 306 and obfuscation system 311 can be embodied by one or a plurality of physical systems and enabled by hardware, software or combinations thereof. The social networking application servers 309 can be executed on or enabled by any suitable number of systems or devices.
Having described embodiments for a system and method for range search over distributive storage systems, it is noted that modifications and variations can be made by persons skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that changes may be made in the particular embodiments of the invention disclosed which are within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3778809 | Hawes | Dec 1973 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6690940 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6782266 | Baer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7181229 | Singh et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7366759 | Trevithick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7849502 | Bloch et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869792 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7899438 | Baker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7899704 | Thompson | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7996005 | Lotter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8175642 | Shah | May 2012 | B2 |
8185953 | Rothstein et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8225413 | De et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8270933 | Riemer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279808 | Sing et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280438 | Barbera | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8384555 | Rosen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8412154 | Leemet et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8417268 | Halferty et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8527013 | Guba et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620354 | Beasley | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635708 | Mahan | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8661123 | Nishiyama | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8682995 | Lawler et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8731530 | Breed et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8761821 | Tibbitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8825759 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8935245 | Cionca et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9019068 | Varoglu | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9042872 | Breed et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
20020049806 | Gatz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030126267 | Gutta et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040111479 | Borden et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122681 | Ruvolo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050096009 | Ackley | May 2005 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060276180 | Henry | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070277224 | Osborn et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080005325 | Wynn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080066020 | Boss et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080146211 | Mikan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080201441 | Bodic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080270038 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294589 | Chu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024747 | Moses et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090125499 | Cross et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090203352 | Fordon et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248436 | Takagi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251282 | Fitzgerald et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260064 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271247 | Karelin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090327150 | Flake et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100042684 | Broms et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100077444 | Forristal | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100398 | Auker et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106573 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161369 | Farrell et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211694 | Razmov et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100246797 | Chavez et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100330543 | Black et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110040586 | Murray et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047282 | Denman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110078036 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110092159 | Park et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125844 | Collier et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110218884 | Kothari et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244825 | Ewell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110244837 | Murata et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289161 | Rankin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296014 | Cancel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307434 | Rostampour et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120047448 | Amidon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047560 | Underwood et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120058744 | Felt et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084349 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102008 | Kaariainen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110071 | Zhou et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151045 | Anakata et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151046 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151047 | Hodges et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166285 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120171990 | Williams et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180135 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201362 | Crossan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233256 | Shaham et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130141467 | Han et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130217363 | Myers | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130282889 | Tito | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140095630 | Wohlert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140123043 | Schmidt et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140180438 | Hodges et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140280530 | Fremlin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280553 | Hernandez et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,708. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,360. |
Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,697. |
Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,697. |
Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,360. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/723,119, filed Dec. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,882, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,808. |
Office Action dated May 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,808. |
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,697. |
“Net Nanny Parental Controls User Guide” 2007, ContentWatch, Inc. http:/netnanny.com/assets/documentation/nn/netnanny—56.pdf, pp. 53-60. |
Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,360. |
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,808. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/308,697. |
Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,360. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120151045 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61421535 | Dec 2010 | US |