The present invention relates to online profiles. More particularly, the present invention relates to an online professional profile.
A job posting site allows job seekers to post resumes and search for jobs. The job posting site also allows employers to post the jobs and browse through the resumes to search for qualified job seekers. However, prior art job posting sites suffer from a number of shortcomings. For example, the job posting site allows the job seekers to post only static information about themselves. As such, the job seekers are not able to actively market themselves to the employers. In addition, the employers are not able to make an instant, informed hiring decision based on the static information.
The present invention addresses at least these limitations in the prior art.
An object of the present invention is to provide an online professional profile within a services exchange medium. In the services exchange medium, buyers find and hire service providers “on demand” to get projects done quickly and cost effectively. Specifically, buyers post projects and service providers search for projects to work on.
In one aspect, a professional profile accessible on a computing device comprising static data commonly found in a print resume. The static data includes skills and credentials. Typically, proficiency of each skill is self-assessed or determined by a test. Each of the credentials is verifiable by using a verification service. The professional profile also comprises dynamic information, wherein a first portion of the dynamic information is provided by the service provider, a second portion of the dynamic information is automatically generated, and a third portion of the dynamic information is provided by an at least one buyer. In some embodiments, the first portion includes a portfolio of completed work products uploaded by the service provider. The first portion also includes at least one interactive window configured to display an image, a video clip, and/or an audio clip. The second portion includes experience which automatically expands as projects are completed. The third portion includes feedback statistics based on feedback provided by the at least one buyer. In some embodiments, the professional profile also includes a Contact Me button configured to provide communication with the service provider. Typically, the communication is a chat, a call, or an invitation to bid. In other embodiments, the professional profile is configured as a team account to allow people in a company to organize as a team and work together.
In another aspect, an online profile accessible on a computing device comprises data commonly found in a print resume. In some embodiments, the data is grouped into sections including an experience section, a skills section, and a credentials section. The experience section is automatically generated and expands as projects are completed. The skills section is configured to allow the service provider to self-assess or to take tests to assess proficiency of skills listed therein. The credentials section lists credentials. The credentials are verifiable by using a verification service. The online profile also comprises a portfolio including work products completed by a service provider and at least one interactive window. The at least one interactive window displays an image, a video clip, or an audio clip. In some embodiments, the online profile also comprises an at least one keyword. Typically, the at least one keyword is associated with a professional ability of the service provider. In other embodiments, the online profile also comprises a Contact Me button configured to provide communication with the service provider. Typically, the communication is a chat, a call, or an invitation to bid. Yet, in other embodiments, the online profile also comprises feedback provided by a buyer. Typically, the feedback is associated with a project completed by the service provider. Yet, in other embodiments, the online profile is configured a team account to allow people in a company to organize as a team and work together.
Yet, in another aspect, a system for actively marketing professional services includes a service provider looking for a project and a profile created by the service provider. Typically, the profile includes professional information. In some embodiments, the professional information includes skills. The proficiency of each skill is typically self-assessed or determined by a test. In some embodiments, the professional information includes data commonly found in a print resume. In some embodiments, the professional information also includes feedback from an at least one past buyer. In other embodiments, the professional information also includes a portfolio of work products completed by the service provider. Yet, in other embodiments, the professional information includes experience which expands as projects are completed. The profile also includes at least one interactive display configured to present an image, a video clip, or an audio clip. In some embodiments, the profile further includes a Contact Me button configured to provide communication with the service provider. Typically, the communication is a chat, a call, or an invitation to bid. The system also includes a potential buyer. Typically, the profile enables the potential buyer to make an instant, informed hiring decision. In other embodiments, the profile is configured as a team account to allow people in a company to organize as a team and work together.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth for purposes of explanation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the invention may be practiced without the use of these specific details. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein or with equivalent alternatives.
In a preferred embodiment, the steps of the present invention are embodied in machine-executable instructions. These instructions can be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor that is programmed with the instructions to perform the steps of the present invention. Alternatively, the steps of the present invention can be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.
Reference will now be made in detail to implementations of the present invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference indicators will be used throughout the drawings and the following detailed description to refer to the same or like parts.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to an online professional profile within a services exchange medium. Preferably, in the services exchange medium, buyers search and hire service providers “on demand” to get projects done quickly and cost effectively. In the services exchange medium, a service provider is able to create an online professional profile in order to be immediately connected to a buyer looking for the service provider's expertise. Typically, the service provider's online professional profile describes the service provider's professional abilities. The buyer is able to review the service provider's online professional profile to make an instant, informed hiring decision. In some embodiments, the online professional profile is organized into different sections, pages, or both for clarity. In other embodiments, the buyer is able to view the service provider's online professional profile on a web browser of a computing device. Preferably, the computing device is an Internet-ready device. The computing device is a personal computer, laptop computer, computer workstation, a server, mainframe computer, handheld computer, personal digital assistant, cellular/mobile telephone, smart appliance, gaming console or any other Internet-ready device.
Within the services exchange medium, the service provider can be an individual or a business. Similarly, within the services exchange medium, the buyer can be an individual or a business.
Instead of self-assessing a skill, the service provider in some embodiments is able to certify the skill by taking an online test, although this is required. Alternatively, certification is required for each skill listed. The online test is typically generated and hosted by the services exchange medium. Alternatively, the online test is generated and/or hosted by a third party site. The online test is typically timed. Each online test varies in length and time.
In some embodiments, the service provider is able to retake a test a unlimited number of times. However, there is a waiting period before the service provider can retake the test. The waiting period is typically two weeks. Alternatively, the service provider is able to retake a test only a predetermined number of times set by the services exchange medium.
In other embodiments, each test will cost the service provider a predetermined amount set by the services exchange medium. Since tests are not free to take and there is a waiting period to take a re-examination, service providers are encouraged to take the tests seriously and diligently, while buyers will be able to reliably depend on and trust the scores that are reflective of the service providers' knowledge. Once the service provider clicks on a “Take Test” button for a skill, the service provider is charged immediately and the test fee is not refundable. If the service provider has test credits, the service provider is able to use these credits each time the service provider takes a test. Alternatively, one or more tests are free to take. For example, an admissions test and/or an English proficiency test are free to take. The admissions test is to ensure that all service providers understand how the services exchange medium works prior to engaging with other users.
In some embodiments, a test syllabus for each skill is provided and indicates the duration of the test as well as other important details surrounding each test (e.g., content, prerequisite knowledge, etc.). In order to pass the test and display the results, the service provider needs to answer, for example, at least 60% of the questions correctly. The service provider is able to revert back to the self-assessment score or delete the skill if the service provider is dissatisfied with the tested score. In other embodiments, the test is considered failed if the service provider does not complete the test and/or runs out of time to complete the test.
Referring back to
Other static data such as an introduction, payment terms, a summary, and a detailed service description are provided as part of the service provider's online professional profile 100. The introduction, which is typically under an About Us section 120, describes and introduces the service provider to the buyers within the services exchange medium. In some embodiments, the introduction includes a profile type, an establishment year, a number of employees, and/or a description. The profile type is an individual or a business. As part of the description, the service provider is able to describe the service provider's professional vision, mission, strengths, approach, infrastructure, growth, and/or future plans.
The payment terms, which is typically under a Payment Terms section 125, specify the terms of payment acceptable to and/or preferred by the service provider. For example, the payment terms specify that the service provider requires a deposit of 50% of a quoted cost before a project startup and a remaining 50% due upon a final completion which follows a review by a buyer. Alternatively, the payment terms specify a payment schedule linked to project milestones specified during negotiations. The payment terms specify a payment using a credit card. Alternatively, the payment terms specify the payment using an escrow service.
The summary, which is typically under a Summary section 130, briefly highlights services, specializations, facts and figures, and/or other information about the service provider. The summary is preferably displayed in an easy-to-read layout such as in a bullet point format.
The detailed service description, which is typically under a Detailed Service Description section 135, expands on the summary provided in the Summary section. In some embodiments, the detailed service description also specifies ownership of a work product, warranty for the work product, maintenance of the work product, buyer responsibilities, and/or third party integrations.
In some embodiments, the online professional profile 100 includes a Keyword Tags section 140 which displays a plurality of keywords carefully chosen by the service provider. The services exchange medium in some embodiments is able to automatically generate keywords based on the service provider's chosen keywords and/or parts of the service provider's online professional profile. The plurality of keywords are descriptors associated with the service provider's professional abilities. As such, the plurality of keywords enable the service provider's online professional profile 100 to be returned as part of a search result when the buyer performs a search for the service provider's expertise within the services exchange medium.
In some embodiments, the online professional profile 100 has a “Profile for” pull-down menu 145 of different experience categories within the services exchange medium. The experience categories include “Software & Technology,” “Sales & Marketing,” “Administrative Support,” “Audio, Video & Multimedia,” “Website Development,” “Writing & Translation,” “Management & Finance,” “Architecture & Engineering,” “Training & Development,” “Legal,” “Graphic Design & Art,” and “All Categories.” Other experience categories are possible. In some embodiments, only those experience categories that the service provider has experience in are part of the “Profile for” pull-down menu 145. In other embodiments, the “Profile for” pull-down menu 145 is set at a default experience category or an experience category that the service provider has the most experience in.
As mentioned above, the service provider's online professional profile includes dynamically generated data. Typically, the dynamically generated data include feedback statistics and experience. A Feedback section 150 automatically generates and displays feedback statistics in a table for a selected experience category. For example, if the “Website Development” category is selected via the “Profile for” pull-down menu 145, then the Feedback section 150 displays statistics regarding “Website Development.” In some embodiments, the statistics include, but are not limited to, a percentage of positive feedback, a number of total reviews, a number of completed projects, and earnings for, such as, “Website Development” within a last six months or a time period set by the buyer and/or the service provider. In some embodiments, a lifetime earnings for “Website Development” is also displayed. In other embodiments, the Feedback section 150 also displays a percentage of positive feedback, a number of total reviews, a number of completed projects, and earnings for “All Categories” within the last six months or the time period set by the buyer and/or the service provider. Yet, in other embodiments, a lifetime earnings for “All Categories” is also displayed. If another experience category is selected via the “Profile for” pull-down menu 145, then the Feedback section 150 dynamically generates and displays feedback statistics reflecting the another experience category.
Similarly, an Experience section 155 automatically generates and displays the service provider's experience for the selected experience category. For example, if the “Website Development” is selected via the “Profile For” pull-down menu 145, then the Experience section 155 lists subcategories of “Website Development” in which the service provider has experience in. Each subcategory in some embodiments has an associated number representing a number projects the service provider has completed for that subcategory within the services exchange medium. In some embodiments, each subcategory also has an associated date that the service provider had last completed a project for that subcategory. In other embodiments, each subcategory also has an associated link to a feedback page listing all completed projects for that subcategory. The feedback page is discussed in detail below.
In some embodiments, the service provider's online professional profile 100 includes a minimum hourly rate, a location, a membership date, a date of last sign-in, and/or a date of last feedback received. In other embodiments, a portion of the data provided for the service provider's professional online profile 100 is hidden indefinitely from the buyer. For example, if the service provider has hidden the location from view, then the location is not displayed as part of the service provider's online professional profile 100. Similarly, if the service provider has not entered the minimum hourly rate as part of service provider's online professional profile 100, then the minimum hourly rate is also not displayed as part of the service provider's online professional profile 100.
As mentioned above, the buyer is able to select and view the service provider's online professional profile 100 within the services exchange medium. Data entered but not hidden by the service provider are typically presented on one page for convenience. For example, the minimum hourly rate, the location, the membership date, the date of last sign-in, the date of last feedback, the Summary section 130, the Feedback section 150, the Keyword Tags section 140, the Experience section 155, the Skills section 105, the About Us section 120, the Payment Terms section 125, the Detailed Service Description section 135, and the Credentials section 110 are displayed and organized on the one page, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the one page also has a link to a weblog (not illustrated). Typically, the weblog is updated and maintained by the service provider. In other embodiments, the one page also has an interactive window 160. Preferably, the interactive window 160 displays an image, a video clip, and/or an audio clip uploaded by the service provider as part as the service provider's online professional profile 100. Typically, the image is a picture of the service provider or is a logo representing the service provider. The image is of jpeg, tiff, gif, bmp, or png format. Other image formats are possible. Typically, the video clip is a visual and personal introduction of the service provider. The video clip is of mpeg-4 format. However, other video formats are possible. Typically, the audio clip is a sound recording of the service provider. The audio clip is of wav, aiff, or wma format. Likewise, other audio formats are possible. The image, the video clip, and/or the audio clip allow the service provider to actively market the service provider as a professional to the buyer within the services exchange medium. The image, the video clip, and/or the audio clip also help the buyer associate the data presented in the online professional profile 100 with human features or characteristics of the service provider. In other embodiments, the one page has more than one interactive window 160 that allows the service provider to upload at least one of the image, the video clip, and the audio clip.
In some embodiments, the one page also has a Contact Me button 165 which allows the buyer to either invite the service provider to bid on a project, to chat with the buyer, or to call the service provider. The Contact Me button 165 provides a direct communication between the service provider and the buyer. Other communication methods are possible. In other embodiments, a current status of the service provider is displayed beneath the Contact Me button 165. The current status of the service provider is offline, online, busy or any other suitable status designations. The current status, in some embodiments, is custom-tailored by the service provider.
In some embodiments, the online professional profile 100 includes a portfolio of the service provider's past work products. Typically, the one page includes a portfolio link 170 to a portfolio page.
In some embodiments, the portfolio page 200 also has an interactive window 160′ and a Contact Me button 165′. The interactive window 160′ is similarly configured as the interactive window 160. The Contact Me button 165′ is similarly configured as the Contact Me button 165. A profile link 250, when activated, displays profile information described above and as illustrated in
As mentioned above, the online professional profile 100 also includes the feedback page. Typically, the one page also has a feedback link 175 to the feedback page.
The first section 305 automatically generates and displays feedback statistics in a table for the selected experience category. For example, if the “Website Development” category is selected via the “Feedback for” pull-down menu 320, then the first section 305 displays a percentage of positive feedback, a number of total reviews, a number of positive review, a number of neutral reviews, a number of negative reviews, a number of completed projects, and earnings for “Website Development” within the last six months or the time period set by the buyer and/or the service provider. In some embodiments, a lifetime earnings for “Website Development” is also displayed. In other embodiments, the first section 305 also displays a percentage of positive feedback, a number of total reviews, a number of positive review, a number of neutral reviews, a number of negative reviews, a number of completed projects, and earnings for “All Categories” within the last six months or the time period set by the buyer and/or the service provider. Yet, in other embodiments, a lifetime earnings for “All Categories” is also displayed. If another experience category is selected via the “Feedback for” pull-down menu 320, then the first section 305 dynamically generates and displays feedback statistics reflecting the another experience category.
The second section 310 displays a project history for the selected experience category. The project history lists all completed projects for the selected experience category within the services exchange medium. Each completed project listed is associated with a title 325, a project buyer 330, a comment by the project buyer 335, a corresponding response 340 to the project buyer's comment, a cost amount for the completed project 345, a date associated with the completed project 350, and/or a feedback received 355. The feedback received 355 includes a quantitative score for each feedback factor 360. Feedback factors 360 include but are not limited to quality, expertise, cost, schedule, response, and professionalism. Typically, the quantitative score is based on a scale of five. In some embodiments, each project buyer listed has an associated link to that project buyer's profile within the services exchange medium. In other embodiments, the buyer is able to contact a project buyer regarding a corresponding completed project.
In some embodiments, the online professional profile 100 allows the buyer to refine the project history for the selected experience category displayed in the second section 310. For example, the buyer is able to view projects for a particular subcategory via a “Subcategories” pull-down menu 365. The buyer is also able to view a list of all projects completed during a lifetime, projects completed within a last six months, or projects completed within a time period set by the buyer and/or the service provider via a “Period” pull-down menu 370. In addition, the buyer is able to view all completed projects, all completed projects with feedback received, all completed projects with positive feedback, all completed projects with neutral feedback, or all completed projects with negative feedback via “Projects” pull-down menu 375. In other embodiments, the online professional profile 100 allows the buyer to sort the project history for the selected experience category by subcategories, cost amounts, dates, and feedback received. Other sorts are possible.
The third section 315 displays information about the service provider's overall activity within the services exchange medium. In some embodiments, a date of membership, a date of last feedback, and a number of repeat customers are displayed. Other information regarding the service provider's overall activity within the services exchange medium are possible.
In some embodiments, the feedback page 300 has an interactive window 160″ and a Contact Me button 165″. The interactive window 160″ is similarly configured as the interactive window 160. The Contact Me button 165″ is similarly configured as the Contact Me button 165.
Accordingly, the online professional profile 100 is a combination of data describing the service provider as a professional. A unique combination of data of automatically generated data, the weblog, the portfolio, the feedback, the image, the video clip, and/or the sound clip, allows the buyer to make an informed hiring decision instantly.
The online professional profile 100 in some embodiments displays when the service provider became a member, when the service provider last signed into the service provider's online professional profile 100, and when the service provider received a last feedback from a buyer. The online professional profile 100 in other embodiments allows a viewer to save and/or share the online professional profile 100, and even to report a violation.
In some embodiments, the online professional profile 100 encompasses profile information described above and as illustrated in
As stated above, the service provider within the services exchange medium can be an individual or a business. A business provider in some embodiments is able to add additional team members by signing up for a Team account. A Team account is typically available to those providers with a small or large business membership. A business provider with a small business membership is able to add up to, for example, five additional team members. A business provider with a large business membership is able to add a unlimited number of additional team members. Each team member has a unique username and password. Team members can access workrooms to chat with the buyers, send private messages, upload files, track time and progress, and update status.
The original person who signed up for the Team account is the account Owner. Any additional team members are assigned the role of an Administrator, Manager or Consultant. Such designation allows ownership of jobs to be assigned to a team member. The Owner has complete control of the account and cannot be deleted. An Administrator also has the same access as the Owner, except their accounts can be deleted by the Owner or another Administrator. A Manager has access to jobs and is responsible for submitting proposals, negotiating terms, managing projects, delivering work and billing. However, the Manager does not have access to the company profile, account and membership related activities such as team administration, withdrawing money, reviewing account transaction history, or changing membership plan. A Consultant works with project leaders to submit the job deliverables to the buyers; this role typically can only access the job workroom, shared files, private messages, tracker and submit time via the status reports.
To establish job ownership and enable accountability, team members should be assigned as project leaders to the jobs that the business or company has been hired for. Only team members with a Owner, Administrator or Manager role can be assigned project leaders to a job. The project leaders of a job manages communication with the buyer, submit statuses and delivers work. The Owner and Administrator are able to easily track status of jobs managed by specific project leaders and re-assign if needed. Project leaders receive private message and other email notifications related to jobs they manage. After the business provider is hired for a job, the person who submitted the proposal automatically becomes the project leader. Project leaders can re-assign their jobs to other team members if needed.
The Team account feature allows the business provider to control access to cash withdraw and other sensitive information by role, to control job ownership to a project leader ensuring accountability, and to create more visibility to team members with multiple user profiles. The Team account feature makes it easier for people in the same company to organize as a team and work together.
The present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments incorporating details to facilitate the understanding of principles of construction and operation of the invention. Such reference herein to specific embodiments and details thereof is not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto. A person skilled in the art would appreciate that various modifications and revisions to the online professional profile will occur. Consequently, the claims should be broadly construed, consistent with the spirit and scope of the invention, and should not be limited to their exact, literal meaning.
The application claims priority of U.S. provisional application, Ser. No. 61/131,920, filed Jun. 12, 2008, and entitled “Online Professional Profile,” by the same inventors. This application incorporates U.S. provisional application, Ser. No. 61/131,920, in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4703325 | Chamberlin et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5008853 | Bly et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5220657 | Bly et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5548506 | Srinivasan | Aug 1996 | A |
5557515 | Abbruzzese et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592620 | Chen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5862223 | Walker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949976 | Chappelle | Sep 1999 | A |
5956715 | Glasser et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966130 | Benman, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987498 | Athing et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009154 | Rieken et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041307 | Ahuja et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049777 | Sheena et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061665 | Bahreman | May 2000 | A |
6064980 | Jacobi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078906 | Huberman | Jun 2000 | A |
6092049 | Chislenko et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101482 | DiAngelo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6119149 | Notani | Sep 2000 | A |
6128624 | Papierniak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154731 | Monks et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161099 | Harrington et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208659 | Covindarajan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223177 | Tatham et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226031 | Barraclough et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233600 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6311178 | Bi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336105 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374292 | Srivastava et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385620 | Kurzius et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415284 | D'Souza et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442528 | Notani et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484153 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6557035 | McKnight | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564246 | Varma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567784 | Bukow | May 2003 | B2 |
6591011 | Nielsen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618734 | Williams | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6662194 | Joao | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6735570 | Lacy | May 2004 | B1 |
6832176 | Hartigan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859523 | Jilk | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871181 | Kansai | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6931385 | Halstead et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938048 | Jilk et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7069242 | Sheth et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7096193 | Beaudoin | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7155400 | Jilk et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7310415 | Short | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7346535 | Younger | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7406443 | Fink et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7437327 | Lam et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444374 | Baker | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7466810 | Quon | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7505919 | Richardson | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7587336 | Wallgren et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7778938 | Stimac | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814085 | Pfleger et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7966265 | Schalk et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8024670 | Rahmatian | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8156051 | Shah | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8224755 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8380709 | Diller et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8504403 | Deich | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8517742 | Johnson | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8682683 | Ananian | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8700694 | Archbold | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8843388 | Westfall | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856670 | Thakur et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9020271 | Deolalikar et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9454576 | Kapoor | Sep 2016 | B1 |
20010011222 | McLauchlin et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032170 | Sheth | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034630 | Mayer | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034688 | Annunziata | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041988 | Lin | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007300 | Slatter | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010685 | Ashby | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023046 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026398 | Sheth | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052773 | Kraemer | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054138 | Hennum | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069031 | Lehman | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078432 | Charisius et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103687 | Kipling | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120522 | Yang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120554 | Vega | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129139 | Ramesh | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133365 | Grey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020194077 | Dutta | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194112 | dePinto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004738 | Chandar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014294 | Yoneyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046155 | Himmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050811 | Freeman, Jr. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055780 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061266 | Ouchi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086608 | Frost | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097305 | Ogino et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101126 | Cheung et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120603 | Kojima et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030182171 | Vianello | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191684 | Lumsden | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212246 | Eleveld | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212627 | Burns et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220843 | Lam et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233372 | Warner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040063463 | Boivin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064436 | Breslin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103167 | Grooters et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122926 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128224 | Dabney et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215560 | Amalraj et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230466 | Davis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230511 | Kannan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230521 | Broadbent et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040241627 | Delfing | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243428 | Black | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033633 | LaPasta | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043998 | Bross et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097613 | Ulate et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131830 | Juarez et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177380 | Pritchard et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222907 | Pupo | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060031177 | Rule | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074708 | Woods | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080116 | Maguire | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095366 | Sheth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106846 | Schulz | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122850 | Ward et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143228 | Odio-Paez | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177041 | Warner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195428 | Peckover | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212359 | Hudgeon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060284838 | Tsatalos | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005536 | Caswell et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022040 | Gordon | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027746 | Grabowich | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061144 | Grichnik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067196 | Usui | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073610 | Marugabandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078699 | Scott et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088601 | Money et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070162379 | Skinner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174180 | Shin | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174394 | Jayaweera | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185723 | Shellnutt | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192130 | Sandhu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233510 | Howes | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080010598 | Smilowitz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046834 | Yu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059267 | Hamilton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059523 | Schmidt | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065444 | Stroman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091774 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104495 | Craig | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134292 | Ariel et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154783 | Rule et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184135 | Washburn et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192130 | Noh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209417 | Jakobson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080244582 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294505 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294688 | Brousard | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080313005 | Nessland et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090011395 | Schmidt | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017788 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055404 | Heiden | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055476 | Marcus et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090112728 | Evers et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116403 | Callanan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132345 | Meyssami et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150386 | Lichtblau | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177691 | Manfredi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199185 | Slawson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210282 | Elenbaas et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090241035 | Tseng et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241172 | Sennett et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249340 | Akiyama et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265205 | Stinchcombe et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288021 | Ioffe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090327081 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017253 | Butler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100088749 | Steeples | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100144318 | Cable | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161503 | Foster | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162167 | Stallings et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100250322 | Norwood | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287525 | Wagner | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324948 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110106762 | Dane et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107088 | Eng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131146 | Skutnik | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208665 | Hirsch | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238768 | Habets et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110302053 | Rigole | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120041832 | Sheth et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120110087 | Culver et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143952 | Von Graf | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150761 | Ananian | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130246294 | Pendyala et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130325734 | Bixler et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074738 | Thankappan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108078 | Davis | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164271 | Forman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140222493 | Mohan et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140358646 | Said et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140377723 | Strong | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150032654 | Huff | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150134600 | Eisner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150206080 | Izaguirre | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160012135 | Wang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 952 536 | Oct 1999 | EP |
WO 0115050 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0173645 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0261531 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Davenport, Thomas H. and Keri Pearlson, “Two Cheers for the Virtual Office”, summer 1998, abstract, retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.pubservice.com/MSStore?ProductDetails.aspx?CPC=3944>. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US06/22734, dated Jun. 3, 2008, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/644,665, filed Aug. 24, 2000, Sheth et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,994, filed Oct. 14, 2008, Diller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,997, filed Oct. 14, 2008, Diller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/206,203, filed May 22, 2000, Anumolu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/999,147, filed Oct. 15, 2007, Diller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/131,920, filed Jun. 11, 2008, Diller et al. |
ants.com web pages [online]. Ants.com [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2008]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.ants.com/ants/>. |
bizbuyer.com web pages [online]. BizBuyer.com, Inc. [retrieved Aug. 18-21, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.bizbuyer.com/>. |
BullhornPro web pages [online]. Bullhorn, Inc. [retrieved on Jan. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.bullhornpro.com/>. |
Cassidy, M., “Going for Broke,” San Jose Mercury News, Monday, Aug. 16, 1999, pp. 1E and 4E, published in San Jose, CA. |
efrenzy.com web pages [online]. eFrenzy, Inc. [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.efrenzy.com/index.isp>. |
Eisenberg, D. “We're for Hire, Just Click,” Time Magazine, Aug. 16, 1999, vol. 154, No. 7 [online] [retrieved on Aug. 19, 1999]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.pathfinder.com/time/magazine/articles/0,3266,29393,00.html>. |
eworkexchange.com web pages [online]. eWork Exchange, Inc. [retrieved on Aug. 18-22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.eworks.com/>. |
EWork Exchange web pages [online]. eWork Exchange, Inc. [retrieved on Jan. 5, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.eworks.com/>. |
EWork ProSource web pages [online]. eWork Exchange, Inc. [retrieved on Jan. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.ework.com.>. |
FeeBid.com web pages [online]. FeeBid.com [retrieved on Dec. 18, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.feebid.com>. |
freeagent.com web pages [online]. FreeAgent.com [retrieved Aug. 18-22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.freeagent.com/>. |
guru.com web pages [online]. Guru.com, Inc. [retrieved Aug. 18, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.guru.com/>. |
Herhold, S., “Expert Advice is Collectible for Start-up,” San Jose Mercury News, Monday, Aug. 16, 1999, pp. 1E and 6E, San Jose, CA. |
hotdispatch.com web pages [online]. HotDispatch, Inc. [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.hotdtspatch.com/>. |
Humphreys, Paul et al., “A Just-in-Time Evaluation Strategy for International Procurement,” MCB UP Limited, 1998, pp. 1-11. |
“IBNL Forges Into the Future of Buying and Selling with Source Interactive Software,” PR Newswire, Jan. 10, 1996. [replacement copy retrieved on May 4, 2009]. Retrieved from Internet: <URL: http://www.highbeam.com>. |
imandi.com web pages [online]. Imandi Corporation [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.imandi.com/>. |
Malone, Thomas W. et al., “The Dawn of the E-Lance Economy,” Harvard Business Review, Sep.-Oct. 1998, pp. 145-152. |
“Netscape Selects Netopia as the Exclusive ‘Virtual Office’ Offering on the New Netscape Small Business Source Service,” PR Newswire, May 11, 1998, Mountain View and Alameda, California. |
onvia.com web pages [online]. Onvia.com [retrieved Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.onvia.com/usehome/index.cfm>. |
Opus360 web pages [online]. Opus360 Corporation [retrieved on Jan. 3, 2001] Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.opus360.com/>. |
smarterwork.com web pges [online]. smarterwork.com, Inc. [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.smarterwork.com/>. |
workexchange.com web pages [online]. WorkExchange, Inc. [retrieved Aug. 22, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.workexchange.com/unique/workexchange/index1.cfm>. |
Shalil Majithia et al, “Reputation-based Semantic Service Discovery”, IEEE Computer Society, 13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies:Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2004, pp. 1-6. |
Ziqiang Xu et al, “Reputation-Enhanced QoS-based Web Services Discovery”, School of Computing, Queen's University, Canada, 2007, pp. 1-8. |
Massimo Paolucci et al. “Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities” Carnegie Mellon University, 2002, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 333-347. |
morebusiness.com, “How to Write Winning Business Proposals: Writing Strategies,” cited in Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2011, <http://www.morebusiness.com/running_your_business/management/v1n11.brc>, published Aug. 1, 1998. |
University of Wisconsin—Eau Claire LTS Online Help Documentation, Microsoft Excel 2003/2004, using the Sort Command, https://web.archive.org/web/20080311184836/http://www.uwec.edu/Help/Excel03/srtcom.htm,Mar. 11, 2008,retrieved Oct. 1, 2014. |
Paolucci et al., “Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities”, 2002, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. |
Muhl, Charles J. “What Is an Employee—The Answer Depends on the Federal Law.” Monthly Lab. Rev. 125(2002): 9 pages. |
Barton, Lisa Horwedel “Reconciling the independent contractor versus employee dilemma: a discussion of current developments as they relate to employee benefit plans.” Cap. UL Rev 29 (2001): 63 pages. |
Moran, Jenna Amato “Independent Contractor or Employee-Misclassification of Workers and Its Effect of the State.” Buff. Pub. Int. LJ 28 (2009): 28 pages. |
Webb, Teresa J., et al. “An empirical assist in resolving the classification dilemma of workers as either employees or independent contractors.” Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 24. (2011): 22 pages. |
Wood, Robert W. “Defining Employees and Independent Contractors.” Bus. L. Today 17 (2007): 6 pages. |
D'Aurizio, Patricia. “Human Resource Solutions Onboarding: Delivering the Promise”. Nursing Economics 25.4 (2007): 228, year 2007. |
Graybill, Jolie O., et al., “Employee Onboarding: Identification of Best Practices in ACRL Libraries”, Library Management 34.3, (2013), 200-218. (Year: 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61131920 | Jun 2008 | US |