This invention relates generally to head positioning suspensions in modern disc drives. More particularly this invention relates to a suspension's bend section which must be compliant in rotation about a certain axis while maintaining relative stiffness in all other directions.
Head positioning suspensions in modern disc drives are designed to be relatively compliant in the normal direction to the disc surface while remaining relatively stiff in all other directions. Compliance in the normal direction (the Z-axis; direction perpendicular to or away from the disc surface) allows the slider to lift off the disc surface and “fly” above the disc while the disc is rotating. Suspension stiffness in all other directions prevents yaw rotation of the head as well as lateral (Y-axis) and linear (X-axis) translation motion while pitch and roll in the head is allowed by the head gimbal assembly.
The head positioning suspension includes a bend section that connects the suspension's base region to the suspension's load beam. The bend section incurs the predominance of the necessary compliance in the form of rotational motion about a transverse or Y-axis that is perpendicular to the suspension's longitudinal or X-axis (the direction of the suspension's extension from the base plate to the slider) and perpendicular to the suspension's out-of-plane or Z-axis. Although rotational compliance about the Y-axis at the bend section is desired, translational motion at the bend section in the Z-axis direction is not advantageous for lowering resonance frequency.
Conventional bend sections are comprised of one or more flat strips of metal spanning the base region to the load beam. Such bend sections have a trade-off between minimizing the Y-axis rotational stiffness and maximizing the Z-axis translational stiffness. Simple beam stiffness relations govern this trade-off. Thus, for a given low Y-rotational stiffness necessary to keep the spring rate low, thus allowing free motion of the slider over the disc surface, there is a limit to how high the Z-axis translation stiffness can be. This trade-off limits other important considerations such as achievable resonant frequencies. In fact, in the case of modem ultra-stiff load beam suspensions, the out-of-plane compliance at the bend section can dominate the resonant response.
Therefore, there is a need for a bend section design that will circumvent the trade-off between low rotational compliance and high translational stiffness inherent in conventional bend section designs.
According to the present invention there is provided a head positioning suspension for a modern disc drive. The suspension has a base, a load beam, and a bend section. The load beam extends in a first plane and has a longitudinal axis extending between its first and second ends. The load beam also has a transverse axis extending perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is also within the first plane. The bend section connects the base to one end of the load beam and includes a longitudinal axis and transverse axis parallel to each of the respective longitudinal and transverse axis of the load beam. The bend section includes a plate with a given width extending substantially within the first plane and a rail that extends across a portion of that width in a direction that is parallel to the transverse axis of the bend section. The bend section rail further extends in a direction out of the first plane.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, as well as the preferred mode of use, reference should be made to the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. In the following drawings, like reference numerals designate like or similar parts throughout the drawings.
The following is a detailed description of the preferred embodiments presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention. The present invention is believed to be applicable to bend sections in a suspension system with particular bending and torsion characteristics. In particular, the present invention is directed to bend sections in disc drive head positioning suspensions that are compliant in torsion and stiff in out-of-plane bending. While the present invention may not be so limited by the following detailed description, an appreciation of various aspects of the invention will be gained through a discussion of the examples provided below.
At least one slider 16 is positioned on the disc 12. As the disc rotates, slider 16 is moved radially in and out as shown by arrow 18 over the disc surface so that the heads located on the slider 16 may access different portions of the disc where desired data is recorded or read from. Each slider 16 is attached to an actuator arm 20 by a suspension 10. The suspension 10 provides a slight spring force which biases the slider 16 against the disc surface. Each actuator arm 20 is attached to an actuator 22.
During operation of the disc storage system, the rotation of disc 12 generates an air bearing between an air bearing surface (ABS) on the slider 16 and the disc 12. The ABS is the surface of slider 16 that includes a reading head and faces the surface of the disc 12. The air bearing exerts an upward force or lift on the slider 16. The air bearing thus counter-balances the slight spring force of suspension 10 and supports the slider 16 slightly above the disc 12 surface by a small, substantially constant spacing during normal operation. Due to irregularities of the disc surface, suspension 10 must be relatively compliant to allow the slider to move up and down, in a direction normal to the disc surface, in order to allow slider 16 to adjust to variations in the disc surface.
The above description of a typical magnetic disc storage system, and the accompanying illustration of
One example of a suspension 110 common in the prior art is shown in
Typically, bend section 100 connects base 112 and load beam 114. Bend section 100 typically has a design and properties different from base 112 and load beam 114 that provide specific results under bending and torsion forces. A further purpose of bend section 100 is to provide a predetermined load to a slider attached to gimbal 115. The bend section 100 typically includes a particular configuration, such as a radius or bend, to provide this load. The function of bend section 100 and its relationship to other components of the suspension 110 are further illustrated in
The suspension 210 includes a base 212, load beam 214, gimbal 215 and a bend section 200. The gimbal 215 has a read head 216 mounted thereto that floats above a disc's surface 12. Suspension 210 further includes a longitudinal or load beam axis 218, a transverse axis 220 extending into and out of the page (shown as a cross circle 220) and an out-of-plane or Z-axis 222. Given the relative positioning of the suspension, slider and disc surface, it is advantageous for the suspension 210 to allow Y-axis 220 rotation motion at the bend section, as illustrated by arrow 224. This type of wide rotation allows Z-translation at the end of load beam 214 to which slider 216 is attached.
Conventional bend sections, such as bend section 200 illustrated in
The present invention is able to circumvent this trade off by utilizing the properties of open channels, which can be very stiff in bending while relatively compliant in torsion. Compliance in torsion of an open channel provides low spring rates and maximum resonant frequencies, while stiffness in bending of the open channel is advantageous for preventing motion in out-of-plane directions Cross-sectional views of a closed channel beam 250 and an open channel beam 260 are illustrated in
In essence, the stiffness of beam 250 in torsion is directly related to the cross-sectional area of the entire cross-section of the beam (X1 multiplied by X2) whereas the stiffness in torsion of beam 260 is directly related to the cross sectional area of walls of the channel. As related to beam 260, this would equal the width of the material (X3) multiplied by the total length of material around the channel (L1+L2+L3+L4+L5). Given the disparity in cross-sectional area used for each beam, the stiffness in torsion of beams 250 and 260 are significantly different. Furthermore, when comparing the stiffness of beams 250 and 260 to the stiffness of a flat plate, both beams 250 and 260 are significantly stiffer in bending while beam 260 has comparable stiffness in torsion compared to a flat plate.
One example of a bend section 300 of the present invention including an open channel, with the advantages described above, is shown in
The components of bend section 300 can be formed from one continuous piece or, in the alternative, may be composed of independent elements coupled or fastened together. As illustrated in
In one preferred embodiment, the angle at which rails 350 extend from plate 330 is substantially perpendicular. Alternatively, the angle at which the rails 350 extend from plate 330 may vary greatly so long as the rails do not extend in the same plane as plate 330. As shown in
The rails 350 of bend section 300 may be formed out of the same material as plate 330 or may be made of a different material and later attached or coupled to plate 330 using any of a variety of attachment methods such as welding, adhesives, or fasteners.
Bend section 300, as illustrated in
One example of a bend section 500, as illustrated in
Another example of a bend section 600 of the present invention, as illustrated in
Another preferred embodiment of a bend section 700 of the present invention is illustrated in
A final example of a bend section 800 of the present invention is illustrated in
Thus, significant advantages are obtained by having the rails extend out of the plane of the load beam, by having a bend section that is an open channel and orienting the open channel transversely to the load beam axis.
Although specific examples of bend sections for a head positioning suspension are described above, it will be understood that any of these bend sections may be applied in different applications in different relations to other suspension components. For example, the design of the bend section may be altered in such a way as to produce out-of-plane compliance in specific directions and amounts for a given application. Moreover, the number of rails, their width, thickness, and positioning with respect to a longitudinal axis of the bend section may be specified for any number of compliance requirements.
The present invention should not be considered limited to the particular examples described above, but rather should be understood to cover all aspects of the invention as fairly set out in the attached claims. Various modifications, equivalent processes, as well as numerous structures to which the present invention may be applicable will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art to which the present invention is directed upon review of the instant specification.
This application claims the benefit of and is a continuation-in-part of the provisional application Ser. No. 60/217,348, entitled “Open-Channel Torsion Bend Section,” filed Jul. 11, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4884154 | Onodera et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5126904 | Sakurai | Jun 1992 | A |
5313353 | Kohso et al. | May 1994 | A |
5452158 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5734525 | Girard | Mar 1998 | A |
5844752 | Bozorgi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850319 | Tangren | Dec 1998 | A |
5870252 | Hanrahan | Feb 1999 | A |
5894381 | Allen et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936803 | Berding | Aug 1999 | A |
6043956 | Hanya et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6141187 | Wong et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6212044 | Murakami et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6307715 | Berding et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307719 | Mallary | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6532135 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020044385 A1 | Apr 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60217348 | Jul 2000 | US |