This invention generally relates to building block systems, and more specifically to building blocks with open-core units useful for construction of walls, screens, fences, floors, roofs, and other construction elements requiring structural panels.
Current building block design and construction practices generally adhere to a closed-core/closed cavity model. This mode of construction has been dutifully adopted without regard to material efficiency or to the widely known shortfalls of continuous panel walls in building construction.
Inherent to continuous panel walls constructed with continuous flange building blocks is material inefficiency. Classic block construction consists of the familiar, rectangular, concrete masonry units CMU with two closed cores that are readily available at construction supply wholesalers and retailers. The blocks are mortared and leveled by masonry crews who reinforce the walls by placing grout with embedded reinforcing bars, rods, or cables within one or both of the two cores. Strength design calculations for these units are based on the compressive strength capacity of the wall section—the concrete face subject to loading, and on the tensile strength of the reinforcing rods, bars, or cables. Other than the area of the block face subject to loading, the compression face, generally less than the total thickness of the face, and the tension reinforcing; no other components factor into the strength design calculations. Thus, neither the parallel face opposite the loading source i.e. side opposite the wind direction nor the interior cores figure into the strength design. Thus, an entire side of structurally superfluous material is created by following the typical closed core, closed cavity block system.
In contrast, corrugated panels have long been recognized and used as a means for optimizing panel materials and strength. Easily recognized examples include cardboard boxes and corrugated sheet metal used for roof decking, floor decking, wall siding, and drainage pipes. Formed and cast-in-place concrete construction including tilt-up concrete walls for industrial and commercial buildings operations have approached this optimization by utilizing the T-beam shapes seen on highway bridges and parking garage floor decks as well as the industrial and commercial buildings previously mentioned. The structural optimization derived in these widely known applications has not been successfully transferred to building block construction. A quick site visit to almost any new construction project in any area of the country reveals that in spite of the multitude of patented block designs, the shape of choice remains the standard, rectangular, concrete masonry unit CMU with two cores.
In accordance with the present invention, a single open-core building block includes an exterior face connected to a pair of flange assemblies and at least one reinforcing strut. Each of the flange assemblies includes an intermittent flange and a web strut, which connects the intermittent flange to the exterior face. The reinforcing strut is connected to each of the flange assemblies, and can also connect to the exterior face of the building block. The present invention further provides for a double open-core building block, largely the same as the single-core building block that may include the same elements found in the single open-core building block with the addition of an closed-core assembly attached centrally to the exterior face of the double open-core building block. In another aspect, the present invention also provides a method for utilizing open-core building blocks to construct a corrugated structural wall that includes continuous longitudinal cores suitable for reinforcement by a variety of reinforcing materials.
Referring to
An open cavity 40 is defined as the unenclosed recess bounded by the reinforcing strut 31 and the web struts 25 and accessible from a direction generally perpendicular to the primary face 15. In construction applications, the open cavity 40 can be used to route electrical wiring, plumbing or other service conduits. Open cores 45 are defined as the space between the primary face 15, each of the connecting flanges 20 and each of the web struts 25. The open cores 45 become enclosed upon juxtaposition with other building block units of the present invention and provide a housing for installation of continuous longitudinal reinforcement. Open cores 45 can be used to route structural supports and concrete during construction. A structural wall section 119, as shown in
Longer spans and off-set vertical joints may be obtained by incorporating the double open-core block units 50 depicted in
Directional changes in the block alignment may be accomplished by inserting a corner block unit 60 as shown in
Turning now to
Construction of a typical wall section is outlined in
With a natural, off-set joint pattern, imprinting and coloring the blocks to mimic brick or stone construction provides a means to complete the structure and external finish in a single operation. Blocks may be fabricated from almost any material including industry standard concrete block materials and coloring admixtures to produce the desired appearance. Typical brick patterns 140 for use with corner block units 60, single open-core block units 10, and double open-core block units 50 are exhibited in
As shown in
Several alternative embodiments of the present invention may also be derived, primarily through utilizing modified shapes for the basic block types previously described. For example, several such alternative embodiments are depicted in
Wall corners may also be constructed with alternative embodiments to those discussed above.
Modifying double open-core block units will also produce effective corner units.
These alternative embodiments can be utilized to produce new brick and stone patterns for wall construction.
As is typical in block construction, horizontal reinforcing may be provided for the wall section by using special auxiliary units. Horizontal reinforcing is accommodated by the use of bond beam blocks 80 as shown in
Other special cases involving specific use blocks occur at wall openings such as doors and windows or at locations that require additional vertical reinforcing for pilasters or columns. For door and window openings, jamb blocks 95 as illustrated in
The specialty blocks, bond beam units 80, jamb blocks 95, and pilaster/column units 96, may be utilized as in typical block construction. Bond beam blocks 80 may be used to provide a housing for the horizontal reinforcement system. Jamb blocks 95 may be used to terminate a wall section at window and door openings. The closed-core 46 of the jamb block 80 provides a chamber for independent vertical reinforcement around the opening while the open-core 45 provides a positive mechanical connection to the rest of the wall section via the vertical reinforcement chamber defined between the jamb block 80 and the adjacent unit. At locations requiring pilasters or columns, pilaster/column blocks 96 may be used to incorporate these features as an integral part of the continuously connected wall system.
Besides structural walls, fences and screens may be formed using any of the methods or block combinations previously described. Roof and wall panels may be constructed using single and double blocks in association with property distributed beam blocks to provide the required transverse reinforcement and connection. Besides concrete, the blocks may be constructed of any material which exhibits sufficient compressive strength to match the capacity of the tensile reinforcement system employed, including various concrete mixtures, resins, wood, clay, plastic, and other composites.
It is clear that the present invention is well adapted to carry out its objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in varying detail for purposes of disclosure, it will be understood that numerous changes may be made which will readily suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention disclosed herein, in the associated drawings and the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/808,302, filed May 24, 2006, entitled Open Core Building Blocks System, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
228052 | Frost | May 1880 | A |
468838 | Steiger | Feb 1892 | A |
474285 | Borgner | May 1892 | A |
566924 | Morrin | Sep 1896 | A |
811534 | Akers | Feb 1906 | A |
829711 | Gaylor | Aug 1906 | A |
847476 | Hodges | Mar 1907 | A |
916687 | Everett | Mar 1909 | A |
916756 | Mosstman | Mar 1909 | A |
1002161 | Lambert | Aug 1911 | A |
1092621 | Worner | Apr 1914 | A |
1219127 | Marshall | Mar 1917 | A |
1287055 | Lehman | Dec 1918 | A |
1330884 | McDermott | Feb 1920 | A |
1388181 | Guimonneau | Aug 1921 | A |
1456498 | Binns | May 1923 | A |
1468892 | Mehr | Sep 1923 | A |
1516473 | Davis | Nov 1924 | A |
1727363 | Bone | Sep 1929 | A |
2141397 | Locke | Dec 1938 | A |
2157992 | Smith | May 1939 | A |
3036407 | Dixon | May 1962 | A |
3557505 | Kaul | Jan 1971 | A |
3936987 | Calvin | Feb 1976 | A |
3995434 | Kato | Dec 1976 | A |
4001988 | Riefler | Jan 1977 | A |
4098040 | Riefler | Jul 1978 | A |
4107894 | Mullins | Aug 1978 | A |
4123881 | Muse | Nov 1978 | A |
4148166 | Toone | Apr 1979 | A |
4175888 | Ijima | Nov 1979 | A |
4186540 | Mullins | Feb 1980 | A |
4190384 | Neumann | Feb 1980 | A |
4262463 | Hapel | Apr 1981 | A |
4301637 | Anderson | Nov 1981 | A |
4312606 | Sarikelle | Jan 1982 | A |
4372091 | Brown | Feb 1983 | A |
4380409 | O'Neill | Apr 1983 | A |
4640071 | Haener | Feb 1987 | A |
4651485 | Osborne | Mar 1987 | A |
D296365 | Forsberg | Jun 1988 | S |
D297464 | Forsberg | Aug 1988 | S |
D297574 | Forsberg | Sep 1988 | S |
D297767 | Forsberg | Sep 1988 | S |
D298463 | Forsberg | Nov 1988 | S |
4802320 | Forsberg | Feb 1989 | A |
D300253 | Forsberg | Mar 1989 | S |
D300254 | Forsberg | Mar 1989 | S |
D301064 | Forsberg | May 1989 | S |
4825619 | Forsberg | May 1989 | A |
4896999 | Ruckstuhl | Jan 1990 | A |
D316904 | Forsberg | May 1991 | S |
D317048 | Forsberg | May 1991 | S |
D317209 | Forsberg | May 1991 | S |
5044834 | Janopaul, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5400563 | House | Mar 1995 | A |
5490363 | Woolford | Feb 1996 | A |
5551198 | Schaaf | Sep 1996 | A |
5588786 | House | Dec 1996 | A |
5623797 | Gravier | Apr 1997 | A |
5653558 | Price | Aug 1997 | A |
5685119 | Zschoppe | Nov 1997 | A |
5704183 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5709062 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5711129 | Woolford | Jan 1998 | A |
5729943 | Cambiuzzi | Mar 1998 | A |
D397230 | Forsberg | Aug 1998 | S |
5788423 | Perkins | Aug 1998 | A |
5795105 | Guth | Aug 1998 | A |
5894702 | Stenekes | Apr 1999 | A |
5951210 | Maguire et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
D417506 | Harding | Dec 1999 | S |
6035599 | Sonnentag | Mar 2000 | A |
6113318 | Guth | Sep 2000 | A |
6168353 | Price | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205735 | Witcher | Mar 2001 | B1 |
RE37278 | Forsberg | Jul 2001 | E |
6253519 | Daniel | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6490837 | Dueck | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508041 | Boot | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539684 | Graham | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6641334 | Woolford | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7185470 | Link | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7384215 | Woolford | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20020187010 | MacDonald et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012609 | Woolford | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040028484 | Woolford | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60808302 | May 2006 | US |