The present invention relates to a hearing aid system and in particular to a receiver system used in the hearing aid system.
A wide variety of hearing aid units are known in the art. In some units, the receiver is positioned within the ear canal in such a way that it creates an occlusion effect. Further, the receiver is encased within the body of the hearing aid. In most cases whether the hearing aid is fitted in the ear, as a custom made instrument, or as an instrument which is placed behind the ear, an occlusion problem exists. This often is a cause of rejection of the amplification due to patient's discomfort with their own voice. This occlusion effect is associated with the sensation of feeling that the patient's head is “at the bottom of the barrel” with the patient's own voice becoming intolerably loud. Placing an earmold or a shell of a custom made hearing aid can produce an additional low frequency amplification of the patient's own voice up to 20 to 30 dB. This can, therefore, be responsible for a four times perceived loudness increase in the patient's own voice. In order to eliminate the occlusion effect, an open ear canal amplification is applied. However, the acoustics of an open ear fitting increase the risk of acoustic feedback prohibiting in most instances to achieve a peak gain of more than 30 dB.
Thus, there is a need for an improved hearing aid system which avoids the occlusion effect and which also avoids feedback, especially during high frequency amplification.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a receiver, receiver placement, and a receiver casing which avoids the occlusion effect.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a receiver system which helps avoid feedback during high frequency amplification.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a hearing aid system having a receiver, such as the aforementioned receiver, separated from the microphone.
The foregoing objects are attained by the receiver and the hearing aid system of the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a receiver and a receiver casing for use in a system for improving a user's hearing, in a hearing aid system is provided. Also, it is the intention to use same receiver system removed from the body of the instrument to be used in a tinnitus device as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,305. It is essential to have an open ear tinnitus instrument in the tinnitus retraining therapy program. Therefore, this present invention will provide such by having the body of the instrumentation placed behind the ear with the receiver placed in the ear canal without obstructing the external auditory means.
In a first embodiment, the receiver comprises a housing to be positioned within an ear canal and a plurality of arms extending from the housing. The tip portion of each arm contacts a surface of a user's ear canal and suspends the receiver within the ear canal.
In a second embodiment, the receiver is housed in a disc. The disc is formed from a frequency specific filtering material. The disc has an adjustable rim which when placed in the ear canal uses spring like motion to maintain receiver position.
Further, in accordance with the present invention, a hearing aid system is provided. The hearing aid system comprises a microphone located externally of a user's ear canal, an amplifier connected to the microphone to amplify sounds received by the microphone, a receiver positioned within the user's ear canal, and means for transmitting the amplified output to the receiver. As before, the receiver preferably has a housing and a plurality of arms extending from the housing for suspending the receiver within the user's ear canal. Alternatively, the receiver may be housed within a disc structure.
Other details of the hearing aid system of the present invention, as well as other objects and advantages attendant thereto, are set forth in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals depict like elements.
Referring now to the drawings,
The hearing aid system 10 further includes a receiver 18 which is separated from the housing containing the microphone. The receiver is installed and suspended within the ear canal 20 of a user and means 22 for transmitting amplified output from the amplifier 14 to the receiver 18. The sound transmitting means 22, depending upon the particular kind of amplifier 14 being used, may be a wire 24 encased within a plastic coating 26 housing the wire. When used, the wire 24 makes an electrical contact with the amplifier 14 and the receiver 18 over which electrical output can be transmitted. The plastic coating around the wire 24 helps prevent electrical shocks.
An alternative way of connecting the output from the amplifier 14 to the receiver 18 is shown in
The microphone 12, the amplifier 14, and the control means may comprise any suitable microphone, amplifier, and control means known in the art. Similarly, the receiver 18 may comprise any suitable receiver known in the art.
As shown in
The arms 30 are quite advantageous because they allow the receiver 18 to be positioned or suspended in such a way that the receiver 18 does not occlude the ear canal. Further, the arms 30 allow the use of any size of receiver in the hearing aid systems. Still further, the receiver, separated from the microphone, provides a greater flexibility in delivering high frequency amplification without causing or creating feedback. Thus, protection of the ear canal and the separation of the receiver 18 from the microphone 12 allows one to achieve greater high frequency gain without feedback.
Further, a suspended receiver away from the ear canal walls will also provide a better protection from impacting the receiver with cerumen.
While it has been stated that the microphone 12 and the amplifier 14 are in the same housing, it should be noted that they could be in separate housings depending upon the type of hearing aid system 10. For example, if the system 10 is incorporated in an eyeglass frame, the microphone could be in one part of the frame and the amplifier could be in another part of the frame.
While it is preferred to form the arms 30 from a flexible plastic material, each of the arms 30 could also be formed from a bendable wire. When formed from a bendable wire, as shown in
If desired, the length of the insertion of the receiver 18 in the ear canal 20 can be adjusted using a retractable wire 24 from the sound transmitting means 22 or by replacing the ear hook on a behind the ear hearing aid unit.
Referring now to
While the receiver 18 of the present invention has been described in the context of hearing aid systems, the receiver could also be used in tinnitus treatment systems. For example, as shown in
While the receiver 18, when used in either the context of a hearing aid system or a tinnitus treatment system, has been described as being connected to an amplifier 14 or a noise generator 90 by a wire, it should be recognized that the receiver 18 could be disconnectable so that it can be separated from the body of the instrument to which it is connected. Any suitable means known in the art may be used to render the receiver 18 disconnectable.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention as shown in
The hearing aid system shown in
It is apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention a hearing aid system which fully satisfies the objects, means, and advantages set forth hereinbefore. While the present invention has been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other alternatives, modifications, and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/325,529, filed Dec. 18, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,751,580, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/241,279, filed Sep. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,076,076, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/445,034, filed Feb. 5, 2003, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/514,994, filed Oct. 27, 2003, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/773,731, filed Feb. 5, 2004 now abandoned, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/535,569, filed Jan. 9, 2004, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/331,842, filed Jan. 13, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,421,086, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/170,574 filed Jul. 10, 2008, the entire contents of each of which are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
789876 | Pape | May 1905 | A |
1830198 | French | Nov 1931 | A |
2363175 | Grossman | Nov 1944 | A |
2930856 | Toht | Mar 1960 | A |
3068954 | Strzalkowski | Dec 1962 | A |
3123678 | Prentiss et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3209082 | McCarrell | Sep 1965 | A |
3581570 | Wortz | Jun 1971 | A |
3688863 | Johnson | Sep 1972 | A |
3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3787643 | Nielsen | Jan 1974 | A |
3890474 | Glicksberg | Jun 1975 | A |
3934100 | Harada | Jan 1976 | A |
4089332 | Rose | May 1978 | A |
4222393 | Hocks et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226248 | Manoli | Oct 1980 | A |
4539440 | Sciarra | Sep 1985 | A |
4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4680798 | Neumann | Jul 1987 | A |
4727582 | de Vries et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4735968 | Guth | Apr 1988 | A |
4759070 | Voroba et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4830139 | Cirillo | May 1989 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4954486 | Guth | Sep 1990 | A |
4956391 | Sapse | Sep 1990 | A |
4984579 | Burgert et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5008058 | Henneberger et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024612 | van den Honert et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031219 | Ward et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5064858 | Sapse | Nov 1991 | A |
5167236 | Junker | Dec 1992 | A |
5201007 | Ward et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5279292 | Baumann et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5325782 | Strauss et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5328330 | Monroe | Jul 1994 | A |
5381484 | Claes et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403262 | Gooch | Apr 1995 | A |
5420930 | Shugart, III | May 1995 | A |
5430801 | Hill | Jul 1995 | A |
5563140 | Ehrenberger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572594 | Devoe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589183 | Jannetta | Dec 1996 | A |
5606621 | Reiter et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628330 | Upham | May 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721783 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
5757935 | Kang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5920636 | Oliveira et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960093 | Miller | Sep 1999 | A |
5979589 | Aceti | Nov 1999 | A |
5987146 | Pluvinage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009183 | Taenzer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021207 | Puthuff et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039685 | Bushek | Mar 2000 | A |
6048305 | Bauman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6094492 | Boesen | Jul 2000 | A |
6094493 | Borowsky et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101259 | Rapps | Aug 2000 | A |
6160895 | Dupont | Dec 2000 | A |
6181801 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253871 | Aceti | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275596 | Fretz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320969 | Killion | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6367578 | Shoemaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6445799 | Taenzer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453051 | Killion | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493453 | Glendon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560468 | Boesen | May 2003 | B1 |
6600825 | Leysieffer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631196 | Taenzer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704423 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748094 | Tziviskos et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6804368 | Tsuda | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6914994 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7027608 | Fretz et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7068803 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7362875 | Saxton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020027996 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020172386 | Bayer | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196958 | Halteren et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002700 | Fretz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030112992 | Rapps | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040010181 | Feeley et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047483 | Bauman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040258263 | Saxton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050123146 | Voix et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3502178 | Aug 1985 | DE |
3508830 | Sep 1986 | DE |
87001632 | Apr 1987 | DE |
3638747 | Oct 1987 | DE |
3625891 | Feb 1988 | DE |
29718483 | Oct 1997 | DE |
29801567 | May 1998 | DE |
0064042 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0158391 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0158391 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0288822 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0695108 | Jan 1996 | EP |
1054573 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2058156 | May 1971 | FR |
792742 | Apr 1958 | GB |
62151100 | Jul 1987 | JP |
WO9213430 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO9907182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO0001196 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO001199 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0042817 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO03015463 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO2004025990 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
China Application No. 200480005563.4, Notification of Granting a Patent for Invention dated Dec. 29, 2011, with translated claims, 5 pages. |
European Search Report—European Application 04708638.4-2002 (5 pg.). |
Horakustik Publication Dec. 2002, Bruckhoff & Partner GmbH, Hannover, 4 pages. |
English Translation of Portions of the Horakustik Publication, 1 page Dec. 2002. |
Court Docket for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 31 pages, date filed Apr. 16, 2007. |
Complaint for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 8 pages, date filed Apr. 16, 2007. |
Answer and Counterclaim for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 11 pages, date filed Jul. 30, 2007. |
Corporate Disclosure Statement for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 5 pages, date filed Jul. 30, 2007. |
Answer with Jury Demand for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 3 pages, date filed Aug. 9, 2007. |
Markman Expert Designation for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 3 pages, date filed Jan. 15, 2008. |
Rebuttal Markman Expert Designation for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 3 pages, date filed Feb. 15, 2008. |
Joint Claim Construction Statement for Civil Docket Case No. 4:07-cv-00212-CVE-SAJ, Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. Oticon, Inc., et al., 15 pages, date filed Apr. 1, 2008. |
Phonak Hearing Systems, EduLink—The Direct Link Between Teacher and Student; p. 1-12, Apr. 2003. |
Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC f/k/a Hear-Wear, LLC v. Dr. Natan Bayman, Nova Hearing Systems, LLC; and Hearing, Balance and Speech Center, Inc.; Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief; Summonses, Civil Cover Sheet; Appearance of L. Page Heslin for Plaintiff; Order on Pretrial Deadlines, dated Sep. 18, 2003; Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice; In the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Civil Action No. 303cv01599 AWT, dated Nov. 12, 2003. |
Knowles Electronics Product Catalog—Standard Receivers [online] Dec. 2006, [retrieved on Dec. 5, 2006] Retrieved from the Knowles Electronics website <URL:http//www.knowleselectronics.com/products/technology.asp?CATEGORY—ID=2&TECHNOLOGY—ID=5>. |
Office Action issued by the Patent Office of the Russian Federation; Application No. 2005127574/28(030952); Filing Date: Oct. 17, 2006; Applicant(s): Vaivatone Hearing Systems, LLC, Dated Feb. 8, 2008. |
Hearing Aid Sales Up a Little in '99, The Hearing Journal Mar. 2000 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006], Retrieved from Find Articles website<URL:http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—hb3496/is—200003/ai—n289085>. |
Kirkwood, David H., Hearing aid sales slip back to norm, but leaders see growth potential, The Hearing Journal Dec. 2005 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006], Retrieved from the Hearing Journal website <URL:http://www.audiologyonline.com/theHearingJournal/pdfs/HJ2005—12pg11-20.pdf. |
Phonak Hearing Systems Media Release UHA 2003, “Phonak know-how address Auditory Processing Disorders,” Switzerland, p. 1-2. |
Phonak Hearing Systems; Field Study News; “EduLink: Improves Speech Understanding in Noisy Classrooms;” May 2004, p. 1-2. |
Phonak Hearing Systems; The Hearing Journal, Jul. 2004, vol. 57, No. 7, p. 45. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US04/03449 filed Feb. 5, 2004. |
Re-exam Application No. 95/001,104; filed Nov. 6, 2008. |
Shepherd, N.L., Heading to the Beginning, Hearing Products Report Jul. 2006 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 5, 2006] Retrieved from Hearing Products Report website <URL:http://www.hearingproductsreport.com/article.php?s=HPR/2006/07&p=3>. |
GN Magazine Jan. 2005 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 7, 2006] Retrieved from GN websiite <URL:http://www.gn.com/var/gn.storage/original/application/ea22f38e4dbfc9fcb0e3cc77e0d7088d.pdf.>. |
ReSoundAiR presentation notes/pamphlet (in Danish) Sep. 8, 2003 [pnline], [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006], Retrieved from GN website <URL:http//www.gn.com/vari/gn/storage/original/application/phpG5vgnN.pdf>. |
An Innovative Non-Occluding DSP Device, GN ReSound article created Apr. 2003 [online], [retrieved on Dec. 6, 2006], Retrieved from GN ReSound website <URL:http://www.openfitting.com/2903-gb-03.02.pdf>. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/39960 filed Dec. 16, 2003. |
“Lend An Ear,” Interview with Natan Bauman by Abram Katz, New Haven Register, Oct. 5, 2003, cited during reexamination serial No. 95/001,104. |
Sandlin, Robert E., Ph.D., “Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification,” Second Edition, Singular Publishing Group, Thompson Learing, copyright 2000, cited during reexamination serial No. 95/001,104. |
Bruckhoff-apparatebau.com; web page downloaded from Internet Archives, Feb. 6, 2003, cited during reexamination serial No. 95/001,104. |
Knowles Receivers Internet published Web pages, circa Jun. 2002, cited during reexamination serial No. 95/001,104. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,529 Decision on Appeal dated Feb. 27, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,104 Order Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,421,086 dated Jan. 27, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,104 Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
Markku Toivonen, et al., Noise Attenuation and Proper Insertion of Earplugs into Ear Canals, Ann. occup. Hyg., vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 527-530, 2002, 4 pages. |
Morgan, N.B., et al., “Taking the art out of smart—Forming processes and durability issues for the application of NiTi shape memory alloys in medical devices,” Proceedings from the Materials and Processes for Medical Devices Conference, Sep. 8-10, 2003, Anaheim, CA, 6 pages. |
Nova hearing aid, Interview by Medical Reporter Jocelyn Maminta with Natan Bauman, appeared on WTNH-TV Channel 8 on Jun. 30, 2003 (retrieved from “http://www.hearingbalance.com/uploads/Nova.WMV” on Jul. 29, 2009. |
“Introducing the Nova” Dr. Natan Bauman, The Hearing Balance & Speech Center (www.hearingbalance.com), Jul. 1, 2003 (retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20030701041351/http://www.hearingbalance.com on Aug. 7, 2009). |
Wikipedia, “Nickel Titanium” Jun. 10, 2009, [cited Jul. 29, 2009] available from: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel—titanium]. |
Wikipedia, “Shape memory alloy” Jun. 28, 2009, [cited Jul. 29, 2009] available from: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—memory—alloy]. |
Carsten, Daugaard, Delta “Insertion loss and occlusion effect measured on open fit hearing aid” Technical Note, Oct. 21, 2008. |
Affidavit of Henning Bruckhoff dated Nov. 27, 2008. |
Affidavit and Declaration of Doug Erickson dated Sep. 29, 2008 and Jul. 25, 2008. |
Notice of Opposition Documents—047086384/1590988, filed Aug. 2009. |
Partial Translation of Appeal Brief filed on Jan. 13, 2009, JP4006470B. |
Notification of First Office Action dated May 8, 2009, 2004800055634 China. |
Reexam 95001104—Requester Comments and Thompson Declaration filed Jan. 6, 2010. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200480005563.4 Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2011, 4 pages. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200480005563.4 Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2011, 4 pages. |
95000596—Reexam Opposition filed in Response to Petition dated Mar. 21, 2011, 14 pages. |
95000596—Reexam—NonFinal Action dated May 23, 2011, 63 pages. |
95000612—Reexam—NonFinal Action dated Jun. 15, 2011, 46 pages. |
95000596—Reexam—Owner Response after NonFinal Action dated Jul. 25, 2011, 45 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Owner Appeal Brief dated Jul. 25, 2011, 73 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Third Party Requester Appeal Brief dated Aug. 5, 2011, 23 pages. |
95000612—Reexam—Owner Response after NonFinal Action dated Aug. 15, 2011, 43 pages. |
95000596—Reexam—Third Party Requester Comments after NonFinal Action dated Aug. 23, 2011, 30 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Owner Respondent Brief dated Sep. 1, 2011, 15 pages. |
95000612—Reexam—Third Party Requester Comments after NonFinal Action dated Sep. 14, 2011, 34 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Sep. 30, 2011, 6 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Requester Respondent Brief dated Sep. 30, 2011, 21 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Owner Rebuttal Brief dated Oct. 31, 2011, 48 pages. |
95001104—Reexam—Requester Rebuttal Brief dated Oct. 31, 2011, 7 pages. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Patent Owner: Auditory Licensing Company, LLC vs. GN Resound A/S, et al., filed by Patent Owner on Jul. 6, 2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-1054. |
Declaratory Judgement action: GN Resound A/S, et al. vs. Auditory Licensing Co., LLC, filed on Jul. 6, 2010 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-1052. |
English Translation of Trial Examiner's Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2010—JP4006470, 12 pages. |
Reexam—95001104—PTO Action Closing Prosecution dated Oct. 1, 2010. |
Reexam—95001104—Amendment filed Nov. 1, 2010. |
Reexam—95001104—Requester's Comments filed Dec. 1, 2010. |
Reexam Application No. 95000596 filed Nov. 19, 2010. |
Reexam Application No. 95000612 filed Jan. 10, 2011. |
Reexam—95000596—Order Granting Request for Inter Parties Reexam dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Reexam—95000596—Petition to Vacate an Ultra Vires Reexam Order Under 37 CFR 1.181 filed Mar. 7, 2011. |
Reexamination Control No. 95/001,104, Mar. 14, 2013 Transcript of Oral Hearing, 43 pages. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Patent Owner: Vivatone Hearing Systems, LLC vs. GN Resound A/S, et al., filed by the Patent Owner on Sep. 2, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,529, filed Dec. 18, 2002, including submitted evidence of secondary consideration, such as the submitted evidence of Vivatone commercial sales success from 2004-2006, evidence of copying by competitors, and long felt need, as well as the related expert declarations. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/773,731, filed Feb. 5, 2004, including submitted evidence of secondary consideration, such as the submitted evidence of Vivatone commercial sales success from 2004-2006, evidence of copying by competitors, and long felt need, as well as the related expert declarations. |
Effect of Ear Canal Occlusion on Pure-Tone Threshold Sensitivity, J. Am Acac Audio 16:740-746 (2005). |
Hearing Aid Handbook, pp. 186-195, TAB Books (1978). |
A Comprehensive Dictionary, definition of “Non-Occluding Mold” The Hearing Aid Journal (1973). |
Ballachanda, Bopanna B., The Human Ear Canal, 1995, Dingular Publishing Group, Inc. 1st Ed., p. 126. |
First Amended Complaint dated Mar. 3, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Phonak Answer dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Sonas et al. Answer dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Unitron Hearing Answer to First Amended Complaint dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Oticon Bernafon Answer Affirmative Defs dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Answer to Amended Complaint by GN Resound dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Answer to Amended Complaint by Siemens Hearing Instruments dated Mar. 23, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Defendant Sebotek Hearings Answer to First Amended Complaint dated Mar. 30, 2008, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Response to GN Defs Answer dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Oction and Bernafons Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Unitron Hearing Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Phonak Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Siemens Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Sebotek Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Sonus and Amplifon Counterclaims dated Apr. 13, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Answer of Widex to First Amended Complaint dated Oct. 1, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
Vivatone's Answer to Widex Counterclaims dated Oct. 5, 2009, Civil Action No. 2-08CV-334. |
95001104 Reexam—Requester Comments filed Apr. 26, 2010. |
EP04708638.4—Response to Opposition filed Apr. 6, 2010. |
95001104 Reexam—Amendment filed May 4, 2010. |
95001104 Reexam—Requester Comments filed Jun. 3, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60445034 | Feb 2003 | US | |
60514994 | Oct 2003 | US | |
60535569 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12170574 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12829494 | US | |
Parent | 11331842 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 12170574 | US | |
Parent | 10773731 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 11331842 | US | |
Parent | 10325529 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10773731 | US | |
Parent | 10241279 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10325529 | US |