The present invention relates to a hearing aid system and in particular to a receiver system used in the hearing aid system.
A wide variety of hearing aid units are known in the art. In some units, the receiver is positioned within the ear canal in such a way that it creates an occlusion effect. Further, the receiver is encased within the body of the hearing aid. In most cases whether the hearing aid is fitted in the ear, as a custom made instrument, or as an instrument which is placed behind the ear, an occlusion problem exists. This often is a cause of rejection of the amplification due to patient's discomfort with their own voice. This occlusion effect is associated with the sensation of feeling that the patient's head is “at the bottom of the barrel” with the patient's own voice becoming intolerably loud. Placing an earmold or a shell of a custom made hearing aid can produce an additional low frequency amplification of the patient's own voice up to20 to 30 dB. This can, therefore, be responsible for a four times perceived loudness increase in the patient's own voice. In order to eliminate the occlusion effect, an open ear canal amplification is applied. However, the acoustics of an open ear fitting increase the risk of acoustic feedback prohibiting in most instances to achieve a peak gain of more than 30 dB.
Thus, there is a need for an improved hearing aid system which avoids the occlusion effect and which also avoids feedback, especially during high frequency amplification.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a receiver, receiver placement, and a receiver casing which avoids the occlusion effect.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a receiver system which helps avoid feedback during high frequency amplification.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a hearing aid system having a receiver, such as the aforementioned receiver, separated from the microphone.
The foregoing objects are attained by the receiver and the hearing aid system of the present invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a receiver and a receiver casing for use in a system for improving a user's hearing, in a hearing aid system is provided. Also, it is the intention to use same receiver system removed from the body of the instrument to be used in a tinnitus device as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,305. It is essential to have an open ear tinnitus instrument in the tinnitus retraining therapy program. Therefore, this present invention will provide such by having the body of the instrumentation placed behind the ear with the receiver placed in the ear canal without obstructing the external auditory means.
In a first embodiment, the receiver comprises a housing to be positioned within an ear canal and a plurality of arms extending from the housing. The tip portion of each arm contacts a surface of a user's ear canal and suspends the receiver within the ear canal.
In a second embodiment, the receiver is housed in a disc. The disc is formed from a frequency specific filtering material. The disc has an adjustable rim which when placed in the ear canal uses spring like motion to maintain receiver position.
Further, in accordance with the present invention, a hearing aid system is provided. The hearing aid system comprises a microphone located externally of a user's ear canal, an amplifier connected to the microphone to amplify sounds received by the microphone, a receiver positioned within the user's ear canal, and means for transmitting the amplified output to the receiver. As before, the receiver preferably has a housing and a plurality of arms extending from the housing for suspending the receiver within the user's ear canal. Alternatively, the receiver may be housed within a disc structure.
Other details of the hearing aid system of the present invention, as well as other objects and advantages attendant thereto, are set forth in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals depict like elements.
Referring now to the drawings,
The hearing aid system 10 further includes a receiver 18 which is separated from the housing containing the microphone. The receiver is installed and suspended within the ear canal 20 of a user and means 22 for transmitting amplified output from the amplifier 14 to the receiver 18. As has been noted, and with reference to the various exemplary embodiments described below (see
An alternative way of connecting the output from the amplifier 14 to the receiver 18 is shown in
The microphone 12, the amplifier 14, and the control means may comprise any suitable microphone, amplifier, and control means known in the art. Similarly, the receiver 18 may comprise any suitable receiver known in the art.
As shown in
The arms 30 are quite advantageous because they allow the receiver 18 to be positioned or suspended in such a way that the receiver 18 does not occlude the ear canal. Further, the arms 30 allow the use of any size of receiver in the hearing aid systems. Still further, the receiver, separated from the microphone, provides a greater flexibility in delivering high frequency amplification without causing or creating feedback. Thus, protection of the ear canal and the separation of the receiver 18 from the microphone 12 allows one to achieve greater high frequency gain without feedback.
Further, a suspended receiver away from the ear canal walls will also provide a better protection from impacting the receiver with cerumen.
While it has been stated that the microphone 12 and the amplifier 14 are in the same housing, it should be noted that they could be in separate housings depending upon the type of hearing aid system 10. For example, if the system 10 is incorporated in an eyeglass frame, the microphone could be in one part of the frame and the amplifier could be in another part of the frame.
While it is preferred to form the arms 30 from a flexible plastic material, each of the arms 30 could also be formed from a bendable wire. When formed from a bendable wire, as shown in
If desired, the length of the insertion of the receiver 18 in the ear canal 20 can be adjusted using a retractable wire 24 from the sound transmitting means 22 or by replacing the ear hook on a behind the ear hearing aid unit.
Referring now to
While the receiver 18 of the present invention has been described in the context of hearing aid systems, the receiver could also be used in tinnitus treatment systems. For example, as shown in
While the receiver 18, when used in either the context of a hearing aid system or a tinnitus treatment system, has been described as being connected to an amplifier 14 or a noise generator 90 by a wire, it should be recognized that the receiver 18 could be disconnectable so that it can be separated from the body of the instrument to which it is connected. Any suitable means known in the art may be used to render the receiver 18 disconnectable.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention as shown in
The hearing aid system shown in
It is apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention a hearing aid system which fully satisfies the objects, means, and advantages set forth hereinbefore. While the present invention has been described in the context of specific embodiments thereof, other alternatives, modifications, and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art having read the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace those alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the broad scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/293,706, filed Nov. 12, 2002 now abandoned, to Bauman, entitled HEARING AID SYSTEM, which is in turn a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/241,279, filed Sep. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,076,076, to Bauman, entitled HEARING AID SYSTEM.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
789876 | Pape | May 1905 | A |
1830198 | French | Nov 1931 | A |
2363175 | Grossman | Nov 1944 | A |
2930856 | Toht | Mar 1960 | A |
3068954 | Strzalkowski | Dec 1962 | A |
3123678 | Prentiss et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3581570 | Wortz | Jun 1971 | A |
3688863 | Johnson | Sep 1972 | A |
3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3787643 | Nielsen | Jan 1974 | A |
3890474 | Glicksberg et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4089332 | Rose | May 1978 | A |
4222393 | Hocks et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226248 | Manoli | Oct 1980 | A |
4539440 | Sciarra | Sep 1985 | A |
4606329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4680798 | Neumann | Jul 1987 | A |
4727583 | de Vries et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4759070 | Voroba et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4830139 | Cirillo | May 1989 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4984579 | Burgert et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5008058 | Henneberger et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5024612 | van den Hinert et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031219 | Ward et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5167236 | Junker | Dec 1992 | A |
5201007 | Ward et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5279292 | Baumann et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5328330 | Monroe | Jul 1994 | A |
5381484 | Claes et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5403262 | Gooch | Apr 1995 | A |
5420930 | Shugart, III | May 1995 | A |
5430801 | Hill | Jul 1995 | A |
5572594 | Devoe et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5606621 | Reiter et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628330 | Upham | May 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721783 | Anderson | Feb 1998 | A |
5757935 | Kang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5920636 | Oliveira et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960093 | Miller | Sep 1999 | A |
5979589 | Aceti | Nov 1999 | A |
5987146 | Pluvinage et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6009183 | Taenzer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021207 | Puthuff et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039685 | Bushek | Mar 2000 | A |
6048305 | Bauman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6094492 | Boesen | Jul 2000 | A |
6094493 | Borowsky et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101259 | Rapps | Aug 2000 | A |
6160895 | Dupont | Dec 2000 | A |
6181801 | Puthuff et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6253871 | Aceti | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275596 | Fretz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320969 | Killion | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6367578 | Shoemaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6445799 | Taenzer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453051 | Killion | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493453 | Glendon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6560468 | Boesen | May 2003 | B1 |
6600825 | Leysieffer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631196 | Taenzer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704423 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748094 | Tziviskos et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6804368 | Tsuda | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6914944 | Nokkonen et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7068803 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7362875 | Saxton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020027996 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020172386 | Bayer | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196958 | Halteren et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002700 | Fretz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030112992 | Rapps | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040010181 | Feeley et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040047483 | Bauman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040258263 | Saxton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050123146 | Voix et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
35 02 178 | Aug 1985 | DE |
35 08 830 | Sep 1986 | DE |
87001632 | Apr 1987 | DE |
36 38 747 | Oct 1987 | DE |
36 25 891 | Feb 1988 | DE |
29718483 | Oct 1997 | DE |
29801567 | May 1998 | DE |
0064042 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0 158 391 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 158 391 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 288 822 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 695 108 | Jan 1996 | EP |
1054573 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2058156 | May 1971 | FR |
792742 | Apr 1958 | GB |
62-151100 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62151100 | Jul 1987 | JP |
WO 92 13430 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 99 07182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0001196 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0001199 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 00 42817 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 03 015463 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004 025990 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040047483 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10293706 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10325529 | US | |
Parent | 10241279 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10293706 | US |