The present invention relates generally to hydraulic lash adjusters, and more particularly, to a hydraulic lash adjuster (HLA) of the type in which there is both a high pressure chamber and a low pressure (reservoir) chamber.
Hydraulic lash adjusters (also sometimes referred to as “lifters” or “lash compensation devices”) for internal combustion engines have been in use for many years, and serve to eliminate the clearance (or lash) between engine valve train components under varying operating conditions, in order to maintain efficiency and to reduce noise and wear in the valve train. An HLA operates on the principal of transmitting the energy of the valve actuating cam through hydraulic fluid, trapped in a high pressure chamber under a plunger. During each operating cycle of the cam, as the length of the valve actuating components varies, as a result of temperature changes and wear, small quantities of hydraulic fluid are permitted to enter the pressure chamber, or escape therefrom, thus effecting an adjustment of the position of the plunger, and consequently adjusting the effective total length of the valve train.
The typical, prior art HLA comprises a generally cylindrical, cup-shaped body member which is disposed within a cylindrical bore defined by the engine cylinder head. Disposed within the body is a plunger assembly which is slidingly received within a blind bore defined by the body member. The lower end of the plunger assembly cooperates with the blind bore to define the high pressure chamber. In the conventional HLA, when a load is applied to the plunger assembly (from the cam profile, by means of a rocker arm), the load increases the pressure of the hydraulic fluid within the high pressure chamber, and fluid escapes the high pressure chamber through a cylindrical clearance defined between the blind bore and the outer cylindrical surface of the plunger. An HLA of the type described is referred to as a “conventional leakdown” lash adjuster. Although the present invention could be utilized in conjunction with various other types of HLA, it is especially adapted for use in an HLA of the conventional leak-down type, and will be described in connection therewith.
In a conventional leakdown HLA, in which the leakdown clearance is defined between the body bore and the plunger outer surface, it is understood by those skilled in the art that the diameter of the blind bore defined by the body must be maintained within a very tight tolerance range. Typically, the final step in machining/sizing the body bore is a grinding operation which, as is well known to those skilled in the art, tends to be a fairly expensive operation, in part because of the cup-shape of the body. Even after such an expensive grinding operation on the body bore, it is typical in the HLA art that the bodies and plungers are “sized and sorted” with regard to the body bore inner diameter and the plunger outer diameter, in order that, after assembly, each body-and-plunger pair has a leakdown clearance within the desire tolerance range. Even after the size and sort operation, and the match fitting of the plunger and body, it is fairly common to have leakdown performance outside of the tolerance range. When such unacceptable performance is identified, subsequent to assembly, it is then necessary to dis-assemble the HLA, and re-assemble the body and plunger from that HLA with other components, in an attempt to achieve HLA performance within the tolerance range. All of that type of “re-work” is time consuming and expensive, and should be avoided to the extent possible.
Those skilled in the art of hydraulic lash adjusters understand that, even though the rocker arm imposes a generally axial load on the plunger of an HLA, there is typically also a side load component applied to the plunger. As is also now well known, any such side load imposed on the plunger will effectively change the leakdown clearance between the body and the plunger, thus resulting in undesirable variations in the leakdown performance of the HLA.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved hydraulic lash adjuster which makes it possible to substantially reduce the cost of machining and sizing the body bore, and substantially eliminates, or at least reduces, the need for the above-described size-and-sort operation.
It is a more specific object of the present invention to provide an improved hydraulic lash adjuster which accomplishes the above-stated objects, and which makes it possible, if desirable, to separate the leakdown function of the HLA from the side load imposed on the plunger assembly.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved hydraulic lash adjuster which accomplishes the above-stated objects, and also makes it feasible to provide a leakdown rate which varies, such as with changes in the temperature of the engine oil.
The above and other objects of the invention are accomplished by the provision of an improved hydraulic lash adjuster adapted to be disposed within a bore defined in an internal combustion engine, the lash adjuster comprising a body disposed within the bore defined in the engine, the body defining a generally cylindrical body bore, and a fluid port in communication with a source of fluid pressure. A plunger assembly includes a plunger member slidingly received within the body bore, and cooperating therewith to define a pressure chamber, the plunger assembly including a reservoir chamber in fluid communication with the fluid port. A biasing means normally urges the plunger assembly outward of the body bore, the plunger assembly including a portion adapted for engagement with an adjacent surface of a valve train component. A generally cylindrical member is disposed within a lower end of the body bore, the biasing means having a lower end thereof seated relative to the cylindrical member. The plunger assembly includes check valve means operable to control fluid communication between the reservoir chamber and the pressure chamber in response to the pressure difference therebetween.
The improved hydraulic lash adjuster is characterized by the body bore extending over the entire axial length of the body. The body bore and one of the plunger member and the cylindrical member cooperate to define a leakdown clearance, permitting fluid communication from the pressure chamber to the reservoir chamber, in response to movement of the plunger assembly inward of the body bore.
In accordance with a more limited aspect of the present invention, the body bore and the generally cylindrical member cooperate to define the leakdown clearance, the plunger member defining a radial fluid passage permitting fluid flow from between the bore defined in the engine and the body, through the fluid port, then through the radial fluid passage into the reservoir chamber.
Referring now to the drawings, which are not intended to limit the present invention,
Disposed within the bore 13 defined within the engine is a hydraulic lash adjuster, generally designated 17, which comprises a body 19 and a plunger assembly, generally designated 21. It should be noted that, for ease of illustration, there appears to be a radial gap between the cylindrical bore 13 and an outer cylindrical surface of the body 19, whereas, in reality, there would be a fairly close, sliding fit between the bore 13 and the body 19, as is already well known to those skilled in the HLA art.
The plunger assembly 21 includes a generally cylindrical plunger member 23, which is slidingly received within the body 19, as was mentioned previously. The plunger member 23 includes, at its upper end in
Disposed within a lower end of the plunger member 23, and comprising part of the plunger assembly 21, is a check valve assembly, generally designated 29, which includes a seat member 31, against which is seated a check ball 33. Beneath the check ball 33 is a retainer member 35, against which is seated a compression spring 37, biasing the check ball 33 toward engagement with the seat member 31. Although it is conventional for an HLA to include a check valve assembly, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to any particular type or configuration of check valve assembly. For example, although the check valve assembly 29 shown in
Referring still primarily to
It is one important advantage of the present invention that, because the body 19 is not cup-shaped as in the prior art, but instead, is tubular and open from both ends, it is possible to finish machining and sizing the body bore 39 by means of a honing operation. As was mentioned in the BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE, in the case of the typical, prior art, cup-shaped HLA body, it was necessary to perform a relatively more expensive grinding operation in order to finish machine the body bore. The ability to utilize a finishing process such as honing, in accordance with the present invention, provides a substantial improvement in the overall manufacturing process for making high quality, cost-effective (closer tolerance) hydraulic lash adjusters.
In a manner which is now well known to those skilled in the HLA art, but is not essential to the invention, the body 19 defines, about its outer periphery, a cylindrical recess 45 which is positioned to be in continuous, open fluid communication with the fluid passage 15. The body 19 also defines a radial fluid port 47, in communication with the recess 45, and similarly, the plunger member 23 defines a radial fluid port 49, such that the reservoir chamber 27 is in continuous fluid communication with the source of the fluid pressure, i.e., the fluid passage 15.
Disposed within a lower axial end of the body bore 39 of the body 19 is a generally cylindrical member 51 which, in the subject embodiment, is somewhat cup-shaped and has disposed therein a stamped retainer member 53, which serves several purposes. One purpose for the retainer 53 is to maintain a seal member 55 in engagement with the axially upper portion of the cylindrical member 51, and in sealing engagement with the body bore 39. In addition, the retainer 53 serves as a seat, against which is disposed the lower axial end of a compression spring 57 (also referred to as a “plunger spring”), the upper end of which is seated against the retainer member 35. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the primary function of the compression spring 57 is to normally bias the plunger assembly 21 “outward” of the body bore 39, i.e., in an upward direction in
As was mentioned previously, the seal member 55 engages, and seals against, the body bore 39, thus preventing any substantial flow or leakage of fluid from the pressure chamber 59, past the cylindrical member 51 into the cylindrical bore 13 surrounding the HLA 17. Instead, in the embodiment of
Referring now primarily to
Referring still primarily to
Disposed within the lower end of the body bore 39 is a generally cylindrical member 71 which includes, toward its upper end, a generally cup-shaped portion in which is disposed the lower end of the compression spring 57, in the same general manner as in the
Therefore, in accordance with another important aspect of the
Referring now primarily to
In the
However, in accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, in the
Specifically, in the
Thus, it may be seen that the present invention provides a series of benefits, and a hydraulic lash adjuster may, in accordance with the present invention, be designed to take advantage of only some of the benefits, such as more accurate finishing of the body bore 39 and less re-work (
The invention has been described in great detail in the foregoing specification, and it is believed that various alterations and modifications of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading and understanding of the specification. It is intended that all such alterations and modifications are included in the invention, insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04253904.9 | Jun 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB05/02143 | 6/24/2005 | WO | 12/14/2006 |