1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to a gas burner having an open loop geometry that achieves uniform or distributed flame characteristics, uniform or distributed heating conditions and an even pressure distribution throughout the burner.
2. Description of Related Art
Traditional gas burners are used in grill and griddle assemblies to heat a cooking surface. There are two types of gas burners that are commonly used that include an atmospheric burner and a powered burner. The atmospheric burner relies solely on static pressure of the gas from a gas supply to provide an air-gas mixture at various burner ports where the air-gas mixture may be ignited to create a flame. The powered burner utilizes a fan or blower and is connected to a supply of gas prior to an inlet of the burner in order to enhance the mixing of air and gas and to further provide the air-gas mixture to the burner at a pressure that is generally higher than atmospheric pressure.
Traditional gas burners exhibit performance deficiencies due to non-uniform flame characteristics, non-uniform heating conditions and uneven pressure distribution that are inherent with the design of the burner. Non-uniform flame characteristics of traditional gas burners often create the non-uniform heating conditions on the cooking surface. These non-uniform heating conditions manifest themselves as localized hot or cold spots along the cooking surface resulting in unpredictable and inconsistent cooking.
Non-uniform flame characteristics are primarily a result of the geometry of the gas burner. The closed loop geometry has a flue on the back end of the burner that results in all of the flue gas migrating to that particular region. The migration of the flue gas to the back end results in an excess heat build-up in that region and consequently, there are non-uniform flame characteristics and non-uniform heating conditions.
The uneven pressure distribution in traditional gas burners is primarily a result of the positioning of the diffuser directly under the ports of the burner. This configuration does not provide a space for the gas to even out the pressure above the diffuser because of the close proximity of the ports. The uneven pressure distribution created by the positioning of the diffuser can also result in popping, flashback, or excess flame lifting because of the non-uniform distribution of gas throughout the distribution section of the gas burner. Furthermore, the location of the diffuser and the inlet in traditional gas burners gives the burner a front to rear overall dimension that can lead to packaging difficulties. It would be more advantageous to have a final assembly that is shorter from the front to rear of the gas burner.
Accordingly, there is a need for a gas burner that achieves uniform or distributed flame characteristics as needed, uniform or distributed heating conditions and an even pressure distribution throughout the burner. Furthermore, a gas burner is needed that has a geometry that provides stable combustion, eliminates popping and flashback, and has improved overall energy efficiency.
The present disclosure provides a gas burner having an open loop geometry that achieves uniform flame characteristics distributed from a plurality of burner ports. The plurality of burner ports are distributed to obtain an even temperature distribution on the surface being heated by the burner.
The present disclosure further provides a gas burner having an air-gas mixture distribution section with uniform or distributed heating conditions and even pressure distribution throughout the burner. The air-gas mixture distribution section provides fully mixed air and gas that is delivered to the burner ports.
The present disclosure still further provides an inlet to the air-gas mixture distribution section that is coupled to a supply of combustible gas.
The present disclosure also provides a gas burner having a fan coupled to the inlet of the burner that mixes air with a combustible gas and provides it to the gas burner at an increased pressure.
The present disclosure yet further provides that the ports of the burner have several slots formed into a substantially flat upper surface of the air-gas mixture distribution section and arranged to balance the thermal characteristics of the burner. The ports are configured to form a pattern that is designed to provide the desired temperature distribution to the surface being heated. In one embodiment, the ports are arranged in an array that has sequences of port rows interleaved with sequences of port columns.
The present disclosure also provides a gas burner having a distribution diffuser located near the inlet to the air-gas distribution section. The distribution diffuser is located between the inlet to the air-gas mixture distribution section and the top heating surface and extends along the sides of the burner to such a distance so that the pressure of the air-gas mixture within the burner is balanced. This geometry provides a bottom fuel entry instead of the traditional front fuel entry, though the present disclosure also contemplates the use of the traditional front entry.
These and other advantages and benefits of the present disclosure are provided by a gas burner having an air-gas mixture distribution section formed in an open loop geometry. The gas burner can have any number of sides designed to provide an open loop geometry. In one embodiment, the gas burner has a first side, a second side and a third side. The air-gas mixture distribution section has a top heating surface. A plurality of ports are disposed on the top heating surface. The air-gas mixture distribution section has an inlet disposed thereon and a distribution diffuser mounted therein.
The above-described and other features and advantages of the present disclosure will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, drawings, and appended claims.
Referring to the drawings and, in particular,
The gas burner 100 of the present disclosure advantageously utilizes heat more efficiently because there are no burner ports disposed at the back end of the burner and thus, there is an outlet for flue gases to escape. The open loop geometry of gas burner 100 provides a natural heat convection through the back end of the burner because it eliminates heat where it is not needed. The hot flue gases in the back end provide residual heat to that area of the burner. Furthermore, gas burner 100 is more energy efficient because a smaller quantity of gas is necessary to achieve the same thermal characteristics. Flame stability is improved because less input is needed to achieve the desired temperature distribution. In addition, gas burner 100 has improved control and accuracy, and has made packaging the burner easier because of the flexibility of the design.
Distribution diffuser 140 provides an even pressure distribution to air-gas mixture distribution section 105. The even distribution of pressure further helps to provide uniform or distributed flame characteristics to ports 125. In one embodiment, distribution diffuser 140 is located between the inlet 135 and top heating surface 130 in such a way as to balance the pressure of the air-gas mixture within burner 100. Distribution diffuser 140 can also extend along long sides 110, 115 to a distance sufficient to balance the pressure of the air-gas mixture within burner 100.
Referring specifically to
This configuration is also advantageous because it provides for a bottom fuel entry instead of the traditional front fuel entry. Also, this configuration provides additional unexpected results that include uniform or distributed flame characteristics, uniform or distributed heating conditions and an even pressure distribution throughout burner 100. Another advantage of having this configuration of distribution diffuser 140 is that it makes manufacturing easier because there is flexibility in where the fuel can enter air-gas mixture distribution section 105. Furthermore, popping and flashback are eliminated in the aforementioned design of distribution diffuser 140. The present disclosure also contemplates a front fuel entry to air-gas distribution section 105.
Diffuser 140 can have screen 240 that is connected to top surface 220. Screen 240 can extend along short side 120, and at least partially along long sides 110 and 115. Screen 240 thus further assists in the balancing of the air-gas mixture pressure within distribution section 105. Screen 240 can be made from a meshed material, so that the air-gas mixture can pass through it, and out of ports 125.
Referring to
Gas burner 100 is controlled by valving that includes a gas inlet valve 177, a blower 175 and a feed pipe 180. Inlet valve 177 and blower 180 are in fluid communication with feed pipe 180 and provide air and gas to feed pipe 180. Feed pipe 180 extends through front wall 150, and is in fluid communication with distribution section 105, to provide an air-gas mixture to gas burner 100. Blower 175 facilitates the mixing of the air with the gas and further provides the air-gas mixture to gas burner 100 that is at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. An igniter 185 also extends through front wall 150 to ignite the fuel flow that is at top heating surface 130 of gas burner 100. In one embodiment, a controller (not shown) can operate inlet valve 177, blower 175 and igniter 185 automatically. In another embodiment, inlet valve 177, blower 175 and igniter 185 can be operated manually.
Referring now to
In the shown embodiments, long sides 110 and 115, and short side 120, of air-gas distribution section 105 are a series of rectangular or square shapes. The present disclosure, however, also contemplates other shapes for the sides of the air-gas distribution section 105, such as round, obround, triangular, and others suitable for providing flame to the surface to be heated.
Referring to
As shown in
While the present disclosure has been described with reference to one or more embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated, but that the disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/011,520, filed on Jan. 18, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
594251 | Henderson | Nov 1897 | A |
640427 | Stephenson | Jan 1900 | A |
854491 | Haggerty et al. | May 1907 | A |
973498 | Geurink | Oct 1910 | A |
1044131 | Brown | Nov 1912 | A |
1151188 | Kelly | Aug 1915 | A |
1170509 | Burnham | Feb 1916 | A |
1187260 | Child | Jun 1916 | A |
1224157 | Fry | May 1917 | A |
1231391 | Lehman | Jun 1917 | A |
1328589 | Roberts | Jan 1920 | A |
1379701 | Schmilowitz | May 1921 | A |
1416500 | Nicolaus | May 1922 | A |
1556140 | Wolf | Oct 1925 | A |
1589993 | Otto et al. | Jun 1926 | A |
1597116 | Skinner | Aug 1926 | A |
1764719 | Gercich | Jun 1930 | A |
1781386 | Harner et al. | Nov 1930 | A |
1789430 | Dibble | Jan 1931 | A |
1791509 | Morrow | Feb 1931 | A |
1862660 | Clynch | Jun 1932 | A |
1967606 | Brown | Jul 1934 | A |
2025458 | Klein | Dec 1935 | A |
2081560 | Rogers | May 1937 | A |
2257888 | Parsons | Oct 1941 | A |
2300156 | Higley | Oct 1942 | A |
2304140 | Bergholm | Dec 1942 | A |
2438996 | Greene | Apr 1948 | A |
2488388 | Evans | Nov 1949 | A |
2898846 | Del Francia | Aug 1959 | A |
3270967 | Westerman et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3476315 | Biggle | Nov 1969 | A |
3624352 | Deaton et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3626923 | Martin | Dec 1971 | A |
3638635 | Drennan | Feb 1972 | A |
3881858 | Fitzgerald | May 1975 | A |
4039275 | McGettrick | Aug 1977 | A |
4083355 | Schwank | Apr 1978 | A |
4092975 | Grammatopoulos | Jun 1978 | A |
4137905 | Longworth | Feb 1979 | A |
4305372 | Hahn | Dec 1981 | A |
4437833 | Mertz | Mar 1984 | A |
4478205 | Koziol | Oct 1984 | A |
4598691 | Herrelko et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4622946 | Hurley et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4901705 | Takata et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919116 | Pfefferkorn | Apr 1990 | A |
4960101 | Home | Oct 1990 | A |
5062408 | Smith et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5062788 | Best | Nov 1991 | A |
5127824 | Barker | Jul 1992 | A |
5154160 | Burtea et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5295476 | Herbert | Mar 1994 | A |
5711663 | Giebel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6102029 | Stephen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6200131 | Birch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230701 | Schultheis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6553986 | Liu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561795 | Lasagni et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6672302 | Voorhis et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676041 | McLoughlin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6699036 | Schlosser et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705307 | Alden et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6945774 | Shoeb | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7082941 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20040018465 | Voorhis et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050000957 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070221192 | Chung | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100291501 | Smit | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009210553 | Aug 2012 | AU |
189501 | Feb 1937 | CH |
1237962 | Apr 1967 | DE |
19745767 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19941275 | Apr 2001 | DE |
10004159 | Aug 2001 | DE |
1030107 | Aug 2000 | EP |
2050830 | Apr 1971 | FR |
2050830 | May 1971 | FR |
2105026 | Mar 1983 | GB |
58181126 | Dec 1983 | JP |
03013703 | Jan 1991 | JP |
06307611 | Nov 1994 | JP |
07167412 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08312922 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09014611 | Jan 1997 | JP |
11-051327 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11051327 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2001-198016 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2008-008569 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008008569 | Jan 2008 | JP |
WO 2008140301 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rejection issued by Chinese Patent Office on Oct. 15, 2012 for Chinese Patent Application Number, 200980102470.6, pp. 6. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2012 corresponding to European Patent Application No. 09707890.1, 10 pages. |
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 for corresponding Japanese Patent Application 2010-543292 with English translation. |
Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2012 corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 2712227. |
China Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2011, corresponding to the Chinese Patent Application No. 200980102470.6. |
Canadian Patent Office action dated May 8, 2013 from corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,712,227, pp. 3. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 3, 2009 issued in the corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2009/031328. |
Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2014 for corresponding Japanese patent application No. JP2010-543292 with English translation, pp. 11. |
Notification of Reexamination by Chinese Patent Office on Sep. 23, 2012 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980102470.6 with English translation, pp. 12. |
Search Report and Examination dated Dec. 31, 2013 for corresponding Malaysian patent application No. PI2010003340, pp. 3. |
Mexican Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2013 corresponding to Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/007766, 6 pp. |
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2013 for corresponding Mexico patent application No. MX/a/2010/007766 with English translation, pp. 12. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2013 for corresponding Japanese patent application No. JP2010-543292 with English translation, pp. 12. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090188484 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61011520 | Jan 2008 | US |