Open-loop method and system for controlling the storage and release cycles of an emission control device

Abstract
A method and system for controlling the operation of an internal combustion engine, wherein exhaust gas generated by the engine is directed through an emission control device, includes determining instantaneous rates of storage for a constituent of the exhaust gas, such as NOx, as well as the capacity reduction of the device to store the exhaust gas constituent as a function of a calculated value representing an amount of SOx which has accumulated in the device since a prior device-regeneration (desulfation) event. The calculated accumulated SOx value is also preferably used to schedule a device-regeneration event, as when the calculated accumulated SOx value exceeds a predetermined threshold value.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




The invention relates to methods and systems for controlling the nominal storage and release times used in connection with an emission control device to facilitate “lean-burn” operation of an internal combustion engine.




2. Background Art




Generally, the operation of a vehicle's internal combustion engine produces engine exhaust gas that includes a variety of constituents, including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NO


x


). The rates at which the engine generates these constituents are dependent upon a variety of factors, such as engine operating speed and load, engine temperature, spark timing, and EGR. Moreover, such engines often generate increased levels of one or more exhaust gas constituents, such as No


x


, when the engine is operated in a lean-burn cycle, i.e., when engine operation includes engine operating conditions characterized by a ratio of intake air to injected fuel that is greater than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (a “lean” engine operating condition), for example, to achieve greater vehicle fuel economy.




In order to control these vehicle tailpipe emissions, the prior art teaches vehicle exhaust treatment systems that employ one or more three-way catalysts, also referred to as emission control devices, in an exhaust passage to store and release select exhaust gas constituents, such as NO


x


, depending upon engine operating conditions. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches an emission control device which stores exhaust gas NO


x


when the exhaust gas is lean, and releases previously-stored NO


x


when the exhaust gas is either stoichiometric or “rich” of stoichiometric, i.e., when the ratio of intake air to injected fuel is at or below the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Such systems often employ open-loop control of device storage and release times (also respectively known as device “fill” and “purge” times) so as to maximize the benefits of increased fuel efficiency obtained through lean engine operation without concomitantly increasing tailpipe emissions as the device becomes “filled.” The timing of each purge event must be controlled so that the device does not otherwise exceed its NO, storage capacity, because NO


x


would then pass through the device and effect an increase in tailpipe NO


x


emissions. The frequency of the purge is preferably controlled to avoid the purging of only partially filled devices, due to the fuel penalty associated with the purge event's enriched air-fuel mixture.




The prior art has recognized that the storage capacity of a given emission control device for a selected exhaust gas constituent is itself a function of many variables, including device temperature, device history, sulfation level, and the presence of any thermal damage to the device. Moreover, as the device approaches its maximum capacity, the prior art teaches that the incremental rate at which the device continues to store the selected exhaust gas constituent may begin to fall. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches use of a nominal NO


x


-storage capacity for its disclosed device which is significantly less than the actual NO


x


-storage capacity of the device, to thereby provide the device with a perfect instantaneous NO


x


-retaining efficiency, that is, so that the device is able to store all engine-generated NO


x


as long as the cumulative stored NO


x


remains below this nominal capacity. A purge event is scheduled to rejuvenate the device whenever accumulated estimates of engine-generated NO


x


reach the device's nominal capacity.




The amount of the selected constituent gas that is actually stored in a given emission control device during vehicle operation depends on the concentration of the selected constituent gas in the engine feedgas, the exhaust flow rate, the ambient humidity, the device temperature, and other variables including the “poisoning” of the device with certain other constituents of the exhaust gas. For example, when an internal combustion engine is operated using a fuel containing sulfur, the prior art teaches that sulfur may be stored in the device and may correlatively cause a decrease in both the device's absolute capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the device's instantaneous constituent-storing efficiency. When such device sulfation exceeds a critical level, the stored SO


x


must be “burned off” or released during a desulfation event, during which device temperatures are raised above perhaps about 650° C. in the presence of excess HC and CO. By way of example only, U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,049 teaches a device desulfation method which includes raising the device temperature to at least 650° C. by introducing a source of secondary air into the exhaust upstream of the device when operating the engine with an enriched air-fuel mixture and relying on the resulting exothermic reaction to raise the device temperature to the desired level to purge the device of SO


x


.




Thus, it will be appreciated that both the device capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the actual quantity of the selected constituent stored in the device, are complex functions of many variables that prior art accumulation-model-based systems do not take into account. The inventors herein have recognized a need for a method and system for controlling an internal combustion engine whose exhaust gas is received by an emission control device which can more accurately determine the amount of the selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NO


x


, stored in an emission control device during lean engine operation and which, in response, can more closely regulate device fill and purge times to optimize tailpipe emissions.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Under the invention, a method is provided for controlling the fill and purge cycle of an emission control device disposed in an exhaust treatment system for an internal combustion engine. Under the invention, values representing an instantaneous rate at which a selected constituent of the engine-generated exhaust gas, such as NO


x


, is stored in the device, and the instantaneous capacity of the device to store the selected constituent, are determined as a function of a calculated value representing an amount of SO


x


which has been accumulated in the device since an immediately prior desulfation event. More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the calculated value representing the amount of accumulated SO


x


is determined as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during lean and stoichiometric engine operating conditions, preferably further adjusted to reflect the effects of instantaneous air-fuel ratio and instantaneous device temperature on the accumulation of SO


x


in the device.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, in a preferred embodiment, the calculated value representing the amount of accumulated SO


x


is used to schedule a device-regeneration or “desulfation” event. Specifically, the value is preferably compared with a predetermined threshold value, with a desulfating engine operating condition being selected when the calculated accumulated SO


x


value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, the values representing the instantaneous storage rate for the selected constituent in the device, and the instantaneous storage capacity, are further determined as a function of a determined value representing a permanent reduction in the constituent storage capacity of the device due to thermal effects and “penetrated” or diffused sulfur which cannot otherwise be purged during a nominal device-desulfation event.




The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The Drawing is a schematic of an exemplary system for practicing the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




Referring to the Drawing, an exemplary control system


10


for a four-cylinder gasoline-powered engine


12


for a motor vehicle includes an electronic engine controller


14


having ROM, RAM and a processor (“CPU”) as indicated, as well as an engine-off timer that provides a value for the elapsed time since the engine


12


was last turned off as a variable, “soak time.” The controller


14


controls the operation of each of a set of fuel injectors


16


. The fuel injectors


16


, which are of conventional design, are each positioned to inject fuel into a respective cylinder


18


of the engine


12


in precise quantities as determined by the controller


14


. The controller


14


similarly controls the individual operation, i.e., timing, of the current directed through each of a set of spark plugs


20


in a known manner.




The controller


14


also controls an electronic throttle


22


that regulates the mass flow of air into the engine


12


. An air mass flow sensor


24


, positioned at the air intake of engine's intake manifold


26


, provides a signal regarding the air mass flow resulting from positioning of the engine's throttle


22


. The air flow signal from the air mass flow sensor


24


is utilized by the controller


14


to calculate an air mass value AM which is indicative of a mass of air flowing per unit time into the engine's induction system.




A first oxygen sensor


28


coupled to the engine's exhaust manifold detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine


12


and transmits a representative output signal to the controller


14


. The first oxygen sensor


28


provides feedback to the controller


14


for improved control of the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine


12


, particularly during operation of the engine


12


at or about the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (λ=1.00). A plurality of other sensors, including an engine speed sensor and an engine load sensor, indicated generally at


30


, also generate additional signals in a known manner for use by the controller


14


.




An exhaust system


32


transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air-fuel mixture in each cylinder


18


through a pair of emission control devices


34


,


36


. A second oxygen sensor


40


, which may also be a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned in the exhaust system


32


between the first and second devices


34


,


36


. A third oxygen sensor


42


, which likewise is a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned downstream of the second device


36


. In accordance with another feature of the invention, a temperature sensor generates a signal representing the instantaneous temperature T of the second device


36


, also useful in optimizing device performance as described more fully below.




Upon commencing lean engine operation, the controller


14


adjusts the output of the fuel injectors


16


to thereby achieve a lean air-fuel mixture for combustion within each cylinder


18


having an air-fuel ratio greater than about 1.3 times the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. In accordance with the invention, for each subsequent background loop of the controller


14


during lean engine operation, the controller


14


determines a value representing the instantaneous rate FG_NOX_RATE at which NO


x


is being generated by the engine


12


as a function of instantaneous engine operating conditions, which may include, without limitation, engine speed, engine load, air-fuel ratio, EGR, and spark.




By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the controller


14


retrieves a stored estimate FG_NOX_RATE for the instantaneous NO


x


-generation rate from a lookup table stored in ROM based upon sensed values for engine speed N and engine load LOAD, wherein the stored estimates FG_NOX_RATE are originally obtained from engine mapping data.




During a first engine operating condition, characterized by combustion in the engine


12


of a lean air-fuel mixture, the controller


14


determines a value FG_NOX_RATE representing the instantaneous rate, in grams-per-hour, at which NO


x


is being generated by the engine


12


, preferably expressed by the following relationship:






FG_NOX_RATE=FNXXX


1


(N,LOAD)*FNXXA(λ)*FNXXB(EGRACT)*FNXXC(SPK_DELTA)*FMXXD(ECT-200)






where:




FNXXX


1


(N,LOAD) is a lookup table containing NO


x


emission rate values, in grams-per-hour, for current engine speed N and engine load LOAD;




FNXXA(A) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for air-fuel ratio which inherently adjusts the FG_NOX_RATE value for barometric pressure;




FNXXB(EGRACT) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for actual exhaust gas recirculation percentage;




FNXXC(SPK_DELTA) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of knock sensor or hot open-loop induced spark retard, with NO


x


production being reduced with greater spark retard; and




FMXXD(ECT-200) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of engine coolant temperature above 200° F.




Preferably, the determined feedgas NO


x


rate FG_NOX_RATE is further modified to reflect any reduction in feedgas NO


x


concentration upon passage of the exhaust gas through the first device


34


, as through use of a ROM-based lookup table of three-way catalyst efficiency in reducing NO


x


as a function of the current air-fuel ratio λ, to obtain an adjusted instantaneous feedgas NO


x


rate ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE.




The controller


14


also calculates an instantaneous value INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE representing the incremental rate at which NO


x


is stored in the second device


36


during each background loop (e.g., t


i,j


) executed by the controller


14


during a given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:






INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE=ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE*FNNXRT_EFF(T,TOTAL_NOX)*FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS),






where:




FNNXRT_EFF(T,TOTAL_NOX) represents a lookup table for instantaneous device efficiency based on instantaneous device temperature T and a current value representing a cumulative amount TOTAL_NOX of NO


x


which has previously been stored in the second device


36


during a given lean engine operating condition, as described more fully below; and




FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of a current value SOX_GRAMS representing an amount of SO


x


which has accumulated within the second device


36


since a prior desulfating event, the value SOX_GRAMS being itself determined based on fuel flow, as described more fully below.




The controller


14


thereafter updates a stored value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NO


x


which has been stored in the second device


36


during the given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:




 TOTAL_NOX←TOTAL_NOX+INCREMENTAL_NOX_RATE*t


i,j


.




The controller


14


then determines a suitable value NOX_CAP representing the instantaneous NO


x


-storage capacity of the second device


36


. By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the value NOX_CAP varies as a function of second device temperature T, a determined value FNSX_CAP representing the amount of accumulated SO


x


, and a determined value PERMANENT_AGING representing an adjustment of NO


x


storing capacity due to thermal aging and penetrated sulfur (which cannot otherwise be purged from the second device


36


during a desulfation event). More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the instantaneous NO


x


-storage capacity value NOX_CAP is calculated in accordance with the following formula:






NOX_CAP=NOX_PURGE*FNNX_CAP(T)*FNSX_CAP(SOX_GRAMS)*PERMANENT_AGING






where:




NOX_PURGE is a predetermined threshold value for second device NO


x


-storage capacity;




FNNX_CAP(T) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of second device temperature T;




FNSX_EFF(SOX_GRAMS) represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of the current value SOX_GRAMS representing an amount of SO


x


which has accumulated within the second device


36


since a prior desulfating event; and




PERMANENT_AGING represents an empirically established capacity modifier which varies as a function of thermal aging and permanent sulfation of the second device


36


.




The controller


14


then compares the updated value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NO


x


stored in the second device


36


with the determined value NOX_CAP representing the second device's instantaneous NO


x


-storage capacity. The controller


14


discontinues the given lean operating condition and schedules a purge event when the updated value TOTAL_NOX exceeds the determined value NOX_CAP.




As noted above, the controller


14


determines values for FNSX_EFF and FNSX_CAP based upon the current value SOX_GRAMS representing the amount of SO


x


which has accumulated in the second device


36


since the last desulfation event, during both lean and stoichiometric engine operating conditions. In accordance with another feature of the invention, the controller


14


determines the current value SOX_GRAMS by determining a value DELTA_SOX representing an instantaneous amount of SO


x


which is being added to the second device


36


during a given background loop time t


i,j


, using the following formula:






DELTA_SOX=FNSOXFUEL(FUELFLOW_MFA AM,λ,t


i,j


)*FNSOXADJ(λ,T)*t


i,j


,






where:




FUELFLOW_MFA represents a calculated value for current fuel flow rate based on current air mass flow AM, the current air-fuel ratio λ, and the background loop time t


i,j


;




FNSOXFUEL(FUELFLOW_MFA) represents an empirically established generated-SO


x


modifier which varies as a function of the current fuel flow rate FUELFLOW_MFA; and




FNSOXADJ(λ,T) represents an empirically established generated-SO


x


modifier which varies as a function of both the current air-fuel ratio λ and the instantaneous second device temperature T.




The controller


14


thereafter updates a stored value SOX_GRAMS representing the cumulative amount of SO


x


which has accumulated in the second device


36


since the last desulfation event, in accordance with the following formula:






SOX_GRAMS←SOX_GRAMS+DELTA_SOX.






In accordance with a further benefit of the invention, the current value SOX_GRAMS is also used to schedule a desulfation event. Specifically, the controller


14


compares the current value SOX_GRAMS to a predetermined threshold value SOX_MAX_GRAMS. The controller


14


schedules a desulfation event when the current value SOX_GRAMS exceeds the predetermined threshold value SOX_MAX_GRAMS.




While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:determining a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device; determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein determining the first value includes accumulating an instantaneous value representative of an incremental amount of accumulated SOx during an engine operating condition characterized by an air-fuel mixture that is not richer than a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the instantaneous value is adjusted based on at least one of an instantaneous air-fuel ratio and an instantaneous device temperature.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, including resetting the first value to zero when selecting the desulfating engine operating condition.
  • 4. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:determining a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device; determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the first value is determined as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during engine operating conditions no richer than a stoichiometric engine operating condition.
  • 5. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:determining a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device; determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, further including determining a third value representing a current capacity of the device to store the selected constituent as a function of the first value; and wherein selecting includes comparing the second value to the third value.
  • 6. In a method for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the method comprising:determining a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device; determining a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein selecting further includes comparing the first value with a predetermined threshold value.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the desulfating engine operating condition is selected when the first value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.
  • 8. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value, the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to accumulate an instantaneous value representative of an incremental amount of accumulated SOx during an engine operating condition characterized by an air-fuel mixture that is not richer than a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to adjust the instantaneous value based on at least one of an instantaneous air-fuel ratio and an instantaneous device temperature.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to reset the first value to zero when selecting the desulfating engine operating condition.
  • 11. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value, the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine the first value as a function of the instantaneous fuel flow rate during engine operating conditions no richer than a stoichiometric engine operating condition.
  • 12. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value, the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine a third value representing a current capacity of the device to store the selected constituent as a function of the first value, and wherein the controller is further arranged to compare the second value to the third value.
  • 13. A system for controlling an engine, wherein the engine is operative at a plurality of engine operating conditions, including a desulfating engine operating condition, characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures lean and rich of a stoichiometric air-fuel mixture, and wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is received by an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representing an amount of SOx accumulated in the device, and to determine a second value representing an amount of the selected constituent currently stored in the device as a function of the first value, the controller being further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the second value, wherein the controller is further arranged to compare the first value with a predetermined threshold value.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the controller is further arranged to select the desulfating engine operating condition when the first value exceeds the predetermined threshold value.
US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
3696618 Boyd et al. Oct 1972 A
3969932 Rieger et al. Jul 1976 A
4033122 Masaki et al. Jul 1977 A
4036014 Ariga Jul 1977 A
4167924 Carlson et al. Sep 1979 A
4178883 Herth Dec 1979 A
4186296 Crump, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4251989 Norimatsu et al. Feb 1981 A
4533900 Muhlberger et al. Aug 1985 A
4622809 Abthoff et al. Nov 1986 A
4677955 Takao Jul 1987 A
4854123 Inoue et al. Aug 1989 A
4884066 Miyata et al. Nov 1989 A
4913122 Uchida et al. Apr 1990 A
4964272 Kayanuma Oct 1990 A
5009210 Nakagawa et al. Apr 1991 A
5088281 Izutani et al. Feb 1992 A
5097700 Nakane Mar 1992 A
5165230 Kayanuma et al. Nov 1992 A
5174111 Nomura et al. Dec 1992 A
5189876 Hirota et al. Mar 1993 A
5201802 Hirota et al. Apr 1993 A
5209061 Takeshima May 1993 A
5222471 Stueven Jun 1993 A
5233830 Takeshima et al. Aug 1993 A
5267439 Raff et al. Dec 1993 A
5270024 Kasahara et al. Dec 1993 A
5272871 Oshima et al. Dec 1993 A
5325664 Seki et al. Jul 1994 A
5331809 Takeshima et al. Jul 1994 A
5335538 Blischke et al. Aug 1994 A
5357750 Ito et al. Oct 1994 A
5359852 Curran et al. Nov 1994 A
5377484 Shimizu Jan 1995 A
5402641 Katoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5410873 Tashiro May 1995 A
5412945 Katoh et al. May 1995 A
5412946 Oshima et al. May 1995 A
5414994 Cullen et al. May 1995 A
5419122 Tabe et al. May 1995 A
5423181 Katoh et al. Jun 1995 A
5426934 Hunt et al. Jun 1995 A
5433074 Seto et al. Jul 1995 A
5437153 Takeshima et al. Aug 1995 A
5448886 Toyoda Sep 1995 A
5448887 Takeshima Sep 1995 A
5450722 Takeshima et al. Sep 1995 A
5452576 Hamburg et al. Sep 1995 A
5472673 Goto et al. Dec 1995 A
5473887 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5473890 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5483795 Katoh et al. Jan 1996 A
5531972 Rudy Jul 1996 A
5544482 Matsumoto et al. Aug 1996 A
5551231 Tanaka et al. Sep 1996 A
5554269 Joseph et al. Sep 1996 A
5569848 Sharp Oct 1996 A
5577382 Kihara et al. Nov 1996 A
5595060 Togai et al. Jan 1997 A
5598703 Hamburg et al. Feb 1997 A
5617722 Takaku Apr 1997 A
5622047 Yamashita et al. Apr 1997 A
5626014 Hepburn et al. May 1997 A
5626117 Wright et al. May 1997 A
5655363 Ito et al. Aug 1997 A
5657625 Koga et al. Aug 1997 A
5693877 Ohsuga et al. Dec 1997 A
5713199 Takeshima et al. Feb 1998 A
5715679 Asanuma et al. Feb 1998 A
5722236 Cullen et al. Mar 1998 A
5724808 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5729971 Matsuno et al. Mar 1998 A
5732554 Sasaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5735119 Asanuma et al. Apr 1998 A
5737917 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5740669 Kinugasa et al. Apr 1998 A
5743084 Hepburn Apr 1998 A
5743086 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5746049 Cullen et al. May 1998 A
5746052 Kinugasa et al. May 1998 A
5752492 Kato et al. May 1998 A
5771685 Hepburn Jun 1998 A
5771686 Pischinger et al. Jun 1998 A
5778666 Cullen et al. Jul 1998 A
5792436 Feeley et al. Aug 1998 A
5802843 Kurihara et al. Sep 1998 A
5803048 Yano et al. Sep 1998 A
5806306 Okamoto et al. Sep 1998 A
5813387 Minowa et al. Sep 1998 A
5831267 Jack et al. Nov 1998 A
5832722 Cullen et al. Nov 1998 A
5842339 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5842340 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5862661 Zhang et al. Jan 1999 A
5865027 Hanafusa et al. Feb 1999 A
5867983 Otani Feb 1999 A
5877413 Hamburg et al. Mar 1999 A
5910096 Hepburn et al. Jun 1999 A
5929320 Yoo Jul 1999 A
5934072 Hirota et al. Aug 1999 A
5938715 Zhang et al. Aug 1999 A
5953907 Kato et al. Sep 1999 A
5966930 Hatano et al. Oct 1999 A
5970707 Sawada et al. Oct 1999 A
5974788 Hepburn et al. Nov 1999 A
5974791 Hirota et al. Nov 1999 A
5974793 Kinugasa et al. Nov 1999 A
5974794 Gotoh et al. Nov 1999 A
5979161 Hanafusa et al. Nov 1999 A
5979404 Minowa et al. Nov 1999 A
5983627 Asik Nov 1999 A
5992142 Pott Nov 1999 A
5996338 Hirota Dec 1999 A
6003308 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 1999 A
6012282 Kato et al. Jan 2000 A
6012428 Yano et al. Jan 2000 A
6014859 Yoshizaki et al. Jan 2000 A
6023929 Ma Feb 2000 A
6026640 Kato et al. Feb 2000 A
6058700 Yamashita et al. May 2000 A
6073440 Douta et al. Jun 2000 A
6079204 Sun et al. Jun 2000 A
6092021 Ehlbeck et al. Jul 2000 A
6092369 Hosogai et al. Jul 2000 A
6101809 Ishuzuka et al. Aug 2000 A
6102019 Brooks Aug 2000 A
6105365 Deeba et al. Aug 2000 A
6119449 Köhler Sep 2000 A
6128899 Oono et al. Oct 2000 A
6134883 Kato et al. Oct 2000 A
6138453 Sawada et al. Oct 2000 A
6145302 Zhang et al. Nov 2000 A
6145305 Itou et al. Nov 2000 A
6148611 Sato Nov 2000 A
6148612 Yamashita et al. Nov 2000 A
6161378 Hanaoka et al. Dec 2000 A
6161428 Esteghlal et al. Dec 2000 A
6164064 Pott Dec 2000 A
6173571 Kaneko et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189523 Weisbrod et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199372 Wakamoto Mar 2001 B1
6199373 Hepburn et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202406 Griffin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205773 Suzuki Mar 2001 B1
6214207 Miyata et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216448 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216451 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233923 Itou et al. May 2001 B1
6233925 Hirota et al. May 2001 B1
6237330 Takahashi et al. May 2001 B1
6244046 Yamashita et al. Jun 2001 B1
6276130 Ito et al. Aug 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
196 07 151 Jul 1997 DE
0 351 197 Jan 1990 EP
0 444 783 Sep 1991 EP
0 503 882 Sep 1992 EP
0 508 389 Jan 1994 EP
62-97630 May 1987 JP
62-117620 May 1987 JP
64-53042 Mar 1989 JP
2-30915 Feb 1990 JP
2-33408 Feb 1990 JP
2-207159 Aug 1990 JP
3-135147 Jun 1991 JP
5-26080 Feb 1993 JP
5-106493 Apr 1993 JP
5-106494 Apr 1993 JP
6-58139 Mar 1994 JP
6-264787 Sep 1994 JP
7-97941 Apr 1995 JP
WO 9827322 Jun 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
C. D. De Boer et al., “Engineered Control Strategies for Improved Catalytic Control of NOx in Lean Burn Applications,” SAE Technical Paper No. 881595, Oct. 10-13, 1988.
Y. Kaneko et al., “Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio Modulation on Conversion Efficiency of Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780607, Jun. 5-9, 1978, pp. 119-127.
W. H. Holl, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions I. Engine-Emissions Relationships,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800051, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
A. H. Meitzler, “Application of Exhaust-Gas-Oxygen Sensors to the Study of Storage Effects in Automotive Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800019, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
J. Theis et al., “An Air/Fuel Algorithm to Improve the NOx Conversion of Copper-Based Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 922251, Oct. 19-22, 1992.
W. Wang, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions, II. Engine-Catalyst Characterization Under Cyclic Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800052, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
T. Yamamoto et al., “Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Three Way Catalytic Reaction,” JSAE 882072—882166.