Open vessel sealing instrument with pivot assembly

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8574230
  • Patent Number
    8,574,230
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 22, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 5, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
An open electrosurgical forceps includes a pair of first and second shaft members each having a jaw member disposed at its distal end. The jaw members are movable about a pivot assembly from an open position in spaced relation relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. Each of the jaw members includes an electrically conductive sealing surface for communicating electrosurgical energy through grasped tissue. One or both of the jaw members includes a knife channel defined along its length. The pivot assembly includes a knife slot and is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the open position and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the closed position. An actuator selectively advances the cutting mechanism from a first position to at least one subsequent position.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present disclosure relates to forceps used for open surgical procedures. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to an open forceps that applies a combination of mechanical clamping pressure and electrosurgical energy to seal tissue and a knife that is selectively advanceable to sever tissue along the tissue seal.


2. Background of Related Art


A forceps is a plier-like instrument that relies on mechanical action between its jaws to grasp, clamp and constrict vessels or tissue. So-called “open forceps” are commonly used in open surgical procedures whereas “endoscopic forceps” or “laparoscopic forceps” are, as the name implies, used for less invasive endoscopic surgical procedures. Electrosurgical forceps (open or endoscopic) utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis by heating tissue and blood vessels to coagulate and/or cauterize tissue.


Certain surgical procedures require more than simply cauterizing tissue and rely on the unique combination of clamping pressure, precise electrosurgical energy control and gap distance (i.e., distance between opposing jaw members when closed about tissue) to “seal” tissue, vessels and certain vascular bundles.


Vessel sealing or tissue sealing is a recently-developed technology that utilizes a unique combination of radiofrequency energy, pressure and gap control to effectively seal or fuse tissue between two opposing jaw members or sealing plates. Vessel or tissue sealing is more than “cauterization” which involves the use of heat to destroy tissue (also called “diathermy” or “electrodiathermy”). Vessel sealing is also more than “coagulation” which is the process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried. “Vessel sealing” is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen, elastin and ground substances in the tissue so that the tissue reforms into a fused mass with significantly-reduced demarcation between the opposing tissue structures.


In order to effectively “seal” tissue or vessels, two predominant mechanical parameters should be accurately controlled: 1) the pressure or closure force applied to the vessel or tissue; and 2) the gap distance between the conductive tissue contacting surfaces (electrodes). As can be appreciated, both of these parameters are affected by the thickness of the tissue being sealed. Accurate application of pressure is important for several reasons: to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue; to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating; and to contribute to the end tissue thickness which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a good seal for certain tissues is optimum between about 0.001 inches and about 0.006 inches.


With respect to smaller vessels or tissue, the pressure applied becomes less relevant and the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as the tissue thickness and the vessels become smaller.


Commonly owned, U.S. Pat. No. 6,511,480, PCT Patent Application Nos. PCT/US01/11420 and PCT/US01/11218, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/116,824, 10/284,562 and 10/299,650 all describe various open surgical forceps that seal tissue and vessels.


Typically, and particularly with respect to open electrosurgical procedures, once a vessel is sealed, the surgeon has to remove the sealing instrument from the operative site, substitute a new instrument and accurately sever the vessel along the newly formed tissue seal. As can be appreciated, this additional step may be both time consuming (particularly when sealing a significant number of vessels) and may contribute to imprecise separation of the tissue along the sealing line due to the misalignment or misplacement of the severing instrument along the center of the tissue sealing line.


Many endoscopic vessel sealing instruments have been designed that incorporate a knife or blade member that effectively severs the tissue after forming a tissue seal. For example, commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/116,944 and 10/179,863 describe one such endoscopic instrument that effectively seals and cuts tissue along the tissue seal. Other instruments include blade members or shearing members that simply cut tissue in a mechanical and/or electromechanical manner and are relatively ineffective for vessel sealing purposes.


There exists a need to develop an open electrosurgical forceps that is simple, reliable and inexpensive to manufacture and that effectively seals tissue and vessels and that allows a surgeon to utilize the same instrument to effectively sever the tissue along the newly formed tissue seal.


SUMMARY

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, an open electrosurgical forceps includes a pair of first and second shaft members each having a jaw member disposed at its distal end. The jaw members are movable about a pivot assembly from an open position in spaced relation relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. Each of the jaw members includes an electrically conductive sealing surface for communicating electrosurgical energy through grasped tissue. One or both of the jaw members includes a knife channel defined along its length. The pivot assembly includes a knife slot and is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the open position and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the closed position. An actuator selectively advances the cutting mechanism from a first position to at least one subsequent position.


According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, an open electrosurgical forceps includes a pair of first and second shaft members each having a jaw member disposed at its distal end. The jaw members are movable about a pivot assembly from an open position in spaced relation relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. The pivot assembly includes a pair of insulative shoulders having a first end defining a cap and a second end operably coupled to opposing sides of an insulative hub. One of the jaw members is configured to rotate about one of the insulative shoulders. Each of the jaw members includes an electrically conductive sealing surface for communicating electrosurgical energy through tissue grasped therebetween to effect a tissue seal. The insulative hub includes a knife slot defined therein. The pivot assembly is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the open position and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism therethrough when the jaw members are disposed in the closed position.


According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a pivot assembly for use with an open electrosurgical forceps for sealing tissue includes a pair of insulative shoulders having a first end defining a cap and a second end operably coupled to opposing sides of an insulative hub. The insulative hub includes a knife slot defined therein. The insulative hub is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a first configuration and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a second configuration. The knife slot is configured to align with a knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a first configuration to permit advancement of the cutting mechanism from a retracted position proximal to the pivot assembly to an advanced position through the pivot assembly and into tissue grasped by the forceps. The knife slot is configured to misalign with the knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a second configuration to prevent advancement of the cutting mechanism from the retracted position to the advanced position.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the subject instrument are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a left, front perspective view of an open forceps with a cutting mechanism according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is an internal, perspective view of the forceps of FIG. 1 showing a rack and pinion actuating mechanism for advancing the cutting mechanism and a series of internally disposed electrical connections for energizing the forceps;



FIG. 3 is an internal, side view of the forceps of FIG. 1 showing the rack and pinion actuating mechanism and the internally disposed electrical connections;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the forceps of FIG. 1 with parts separated;



FIG. 5A is an enlarged, left, perspective view of a pivoting hub of FIG. 4;



FIG. 5B is a left, perspective view of the pivoting hub of FIG. 5A with parts separated;



FIG. 5C is an enlarged, top view of the pivoting hub of FIG. 5A;



FIG. 5D is a front, cross sectional view of the pivoting hub of FIG. 5A;



FIG. 6 is an enlarged, perspective view of a cutting mechanism of FIG. 4;



FIG. 7 is an enlarged, side, cross sectional view showing the forceps of FIG. 1 in a closed position and defining a gap distance “G” between opposing jaw members;



FIG. 8 is an enlarged, side, cross sectional view showing the forceps of FIG. 1 in open configuration for grasping tissue; and



FIG. 9 is an enlarged, side, cross sectional view showing the forceps of FIG. 1 in a closed position and showing the activation and advancement of the cutting mechanism.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to FIG. 1, a forceps 10 for use with open surgical procedures includes elongated shaft portions 12a and 12b each having a proximal end 14a, 14b and a distal end 16a and 16b, respectively. In the drawings and in the descriptions that follow, the term “proximal”, as is traditional, will refer to the end of the forceps 10 that is closer to the user, while the term “distal” will refer to the end that is further from the user.


The forceps 10 includes an end effector assembly 100 that attaches to the distal ends 16a and 16b of shafts 12a and 12b, respectively. As explained in more detail below, the end effector assembly 100 includes pair of opposing jaw members 110 and 120 that are pivotably connected about a pivot assembly 65 (See FIGS. 5A-5D) and that are movable relative to one another to grasp tissue.


Each shaft 12a and 12b includes a handle 15 and 17, respectively, disposed at the proximal end 14a and 14b thereof that each define a finger hole 15a and 17a, respectively, therethrough for receiving a finger of the user. Finger holes 15a and 17a facilitate movement of the shafts 12a and 12b relative to one another that, in turn, pivot the jaw members 110 and 120 from an open position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a clamping or closed position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween. As shown in FIG. 1, a ratchet 30 mechanism is disposed at the proximal ends 14a, 14b of shafts 12a, 12b, respectively, for selectively locking the jaw members 110 and 120 relative to one another in at least one position during pivoting.


As best seen in FIG. 4, shaft 12b is constructed from two components, namely, 12b1 and 12b2, which matingly engage one another about the distal end 16a of shaft 12a to form shaft 12b. In some embodiments, the two component halves 12b1 and 12b2 may be ultrasonically-welded together at a plurality of different weld points or the component halves 12b1 and 12b2 may be mechanically engaged in any other known fashion, snap-fit, glued, screwed, etc. After component halves 12b1 and 12b2 are welded together to form shaft 12b, shaft 12a is secured about pivot assembly 65 and positioned within a cut-out or relief 21 defined within shaft portion 12b2 such that shaft 12a is movable relative to shaft 12b. More particularly, when the user moves the shaft 12a relative to shaft 12b to close or open the jaw members 110 and 120, the distal portion of shaft 12a moves within cutout 21 formed within portion 12b2.


Jaw member 110 includes an electrically conductive sealing surface 112 that conducts electrosurgical energy of a first potential to tissue. Likewise, jaw member 120 includes an electrically conductive sealing surface 122 that conducts electrosurgical energy of a second potential to tissue.


As best illustrated in FIG. 1, one of the shafts, e.g., 12b, includes a proximal shaft connector 77 that is designed to connect the forceps 10 to a source of electrosurgical energy, such as an electrosurgical generator (not shown). The proximal shaft connector 77 electromechanically engages an electrosurgical cable 70 so that a user may selectively apply electrosurgical energy as needed. Alternatively, the cable 70 may be feed directly into shaft 12b (or 12a).


The distal end of the cable 70 may connect to a handswitch 50 to permit the user to selectively apply electrosurgical energy as needed to seal tissue grasped between jaw members 110 and 120. More particularly, the interior of cable 70 houses leads 71a, 71b and 71c that upon activation of the handswitch 50 conduct different electrical potentials from the electrosurgical generator to each of the jaw members 110 and 120 (See FIGS. 2 and 3). The electrosurgical cable 70 is fed into the bottom of shaft 12b and is held securely therein by one or more mechanical interfaces (not shown). Lead 71c extends directly from cable 70 and connects to jaw member 120 at connection 117 to conduct the second electrical potential thereto. Leads 71a and 71b extend from cable 70 and connect to a circuit board 52.


The electrical leads 71a and 71b are electrically connected to the circuit board 52 such that when the switch 50 is depressed, a trigger lead 72 carries the first electrical potential from the circuit board 52 to jaw member 110. The second electrical potential is carried by lead 71c directly from the generator (not shown) to jaw member 120 through a terminal connector 150. As best shown in FIG. 1, a switch cap 53 is positioned in electro-mechanical communication with the circuit board 52 along one side of shaft 12b to facilitate activation of switch 50. The position of the switch cap 53 enables the user to easily and selectively energize the jaw members 110 and 120 with a single hand.


The two opposing jaw members 110 and 120 of the end effector assembly 100 are pivotable about pivot assembly 65 from the open position to the closed position for grasping tissue therebetween. Pivot assembly 65 connects through aperture 125 disposed through shaft 12a and aperture 111 disposed through shaft 12b. In this manner, pivot assembly 65 operates to pivotably secure the shafts 12a and 12b during assembly such that the jaw members 110 and 120 are freely pivotable between the open and closed positions.


As shown in FIGS. 5A-5D, pivot assembly 65 generally includes a hub 60 having a blade slot 61 defined longitudinally therethrough and a pair of shoulders 67a, 67b each having a first end operably coupled to an opposing side of the hub 60. Hub 60 includes a pair of inner protrusions 63a, 63b, that define corresponding inner recesses 72a, 72b, and a pair of outer protrusions 62a, 62b that at least partially surround inner protrusions 63a, 63b, respectively, to define a pair of respective outer recesses 74a, 74b therebetween. Shoulders 67a, 67b include caps 65a, 65b, respectively, defined at a second end thereof. A pair of pivot pins 64a, 64b are configured to be received at one end within recesses 69a, 69b defined in shoulders 67a, 67b, respectively, and at an opposing end within corresponding inner recesses 72a, 72b to matingly engage shoulders 67a, 67b with hub 60. As shown in FIG. 5B, outer recesses 74a, 74b are generally circular in shape and expand a suitable distance between outer protrusions 62a, 62b and inner protrusions 63a, 63b such that upon receiving pivot pins 64a, 64b within inner recesses 72a, 72b, the latitudinal thickness of shoulders 67a, 67b is accommodated within outer recesses 74a, 74b, respectively. In embodiments, pivot pins 64a, 64b are made from steel and hub 60 and caps 65a, 65b are made from an insulative substrate, such as plastic or some other non-conductive material. Alternatively, hub 60 and/or shoulders 67a, 67b may be made from a solid or multi-strand electrically conductive material, e.g., copper/aluminum, which is surrounded by an insulative, non-conductive coating (not shown), e.g., plastic.


Shoulders 67a, 67b and hub 60 may be ultrasonically welded together at one or more weld points. Alternatively, shoulders 67a, 67b and hub 60 may be mechanically engaged in any other suitable fashion, snap-fit, glued, screwed, etc.


As best seen in FIGS. 7-9, the jaw members 110 and 120 include a knife channel 115 disposed therebetween that is configured to allow reciprocation of a cutting mechanism 80 (see FIG. 6) therewithin. One example of a knife channel is disclosed in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,267,677. The complete knife channel 115 is formed when two opposing channel halves 115a and 115b associated with respective jaw members 110 and 120 come together upon grasping of the tissue. The complete knife channel 115 aligns with blade slot 61 to permit reciprocation of cutting mechanism 80 therethrough. The knife channel 115 may be tapered or some other configuration, which facilitates or enhances cutting of the tissue during reciprocation of the cutting mechanism 80 in the distal direction (see FIG. 9). Moreover, the knife channel 115 may be formed with one or more safety features that prevent the cutting mechanism 80 from advancing through the tissue until the jaw members 110 and 120 are closed about the tissue. Examples of lockout mechanisms and safety features are described in commonly-owned U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0154387 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,156,846 and 7,150,097.


The arrangement of shaft 12b is slightly different from shaft 12a. More particularly, shaft 12b is generally hollow to house the handswitch 50 (and the electrical components associated therewith), an actuating mechanism 40 and the cutting mechanism 80. As best seen in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, the actuating mechanism 40 includes a rack and pinion system having first and second gear tracks 42 and 86, respectively, and a pinion 45 to advance the cutting mechanism 80. More particularly, the actuating mechanism 40 includes a trigger or finger tab 43 that is operatively associated with a first gear rack 42 such that movement of the trigger or finger tab 43 moves the first rack 42 in a corresponding direction. The actuating mechanism 40 mechanically cooperates with a second gear rack 86, which is operatively associated with a drive rod 89, and which advances the entire cutting mechanism 80, as will be explained in more detail below. Drive rod 89 includes a distal end 81 that is configured to mechanically support the cutting blade 85.


Interdisposed between the first and second gear racks 42 and 86, respectively, is a pinion gear 45 that mechanically meshes with both gear racks 42 and 86 and converts proximal motion of the trigger 43 into distal translation of the drive rod 89 and vice versa. Distal translation of the drive rod 89 advances the blade 85 of the cutting mechanism 80 through tissue 400 grasped between jaw members 110 and 120, i.e., the cutting mechanism 80, e.g., knife, blade, wire, etc., is advanced through blade slot 61 and, subsequently, through channel 115 upon distal translation of the drive rod 89.


The distal end 81 of the cutting mechanism 80 is dimensioned to reciprocate within a channel 126b defined in the proximal end of jaw member 120 when jaw member 110 and 120 are disposed in a closed position (see FIGS. 7 and 9). The proximal portion of jaw member 120 also includes a guide slot 124 defined therethrough that allows a terminal connector 150 or so called “POGO” pin to ride therein upon movement of the jaw members 110 and 120 from the open to closed positions (See FIGS. 7 and 8). The terminal connector 150 is seated within a recess 113. In addition, the proximal end includes an aperture 125 defined therethrough that houses the pivot assembly 65. Jaw member 110 also includes a channel 126a that aligns with channel 126b when the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in the closed position about tissue.


As best shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, which show the jaw members 110 and 120 in open and closed orientations, respectively, the operation of the pivoting hub 65 in the capacity as a lockout mechanism is easily described. Pivot assembly 65 is operably coupled with jaw member 120 such that pivoting of jaw member 120 causes identical pivoting movement of pivot assembly 65, i.e., pivot assembly 120 pivots with jaw member 120. In this manner, when jaw members 110 and 120 are moved from the closed position to the open position, hub 60 rotates in translation with jaw member 120 such that blade slot 61 moves out of alignment with knife channel 115 to prevent the cutting mechanism 80 from advancing through hub 60 via blade slot 61. When the jaw members 110 and 120 are moved to the closed position as illustrated in FIG. 9, the hub 60 rotates with jaw member 120 to align blade slot 61 with channels 126a and 126b of jaw members 110 and 120, respectively, to allow distal advancement of cutting mechanism 80 through hub 60 and, subsequently, through knife channel 115. As shown in FIG. 9, the distal end 81 advances through channel 126a and 126b forcing the knife blade 85 through knife channel 115 (115a and 115b) to cut tissue. As described above, when the actuating flange 43 is released, drive rod 89 returns or is biased back to the proximal-most position (not shown) which, in turn, allows the jaw members 110 and 120 to be moved to the open position to release the tissue 400.


Referring now to FIG. 6, blade 85 is flexible so it easily advances through the curved knife channel 115. For example, upon distal advancement of the cutting mechanism 80, the cutting blade 85 will simply flex and ride around the knife channel 115 through the tissue 400 held between jaw members 110 and 120. In one particular embodiment, the blade 85 is flexible and is generally hourglass in configuration and includes a mutually aggregating notch 87a disposed about midway along the blade 85. The mutually aggregating notch 87a reduces the side profile of the blade to facilitate the cutting process. More particularly, the hourglass design of the blade allows the blade 85 to move more easily along the curved knife channel 115 during distal translation thereof.


In some embodiments, one of the jaw members, e.g., 120, includes at least one stop member 175 (see FIG. 8) disposed on the inner facing surface of the electrically conductive sealing surface 122 (and/or 112). The stop member(s) is designed to facilitate gripping and manipulation of tissue and to define a gap “G” between opposing jaw members 110 and 120 during sealing (See FIG. 7). In some embodiments, the separation distance during sealing or the gap distance “G” is within the range of about 0.001 inches (.about.0.03 millimeters) to about 0.006 inches (.about.0.016 millimeters). In some embodiments, a stop member 175 is positioned on either side of the knife channel 115 generally midway along the length of the bottom jaw member 120.


A detailed discussion of these and other envisioned stop members 175 as well as various manufacturing and assembling processes for attaching, disposing, depositing and/or affixing the stop members to the electrically conductive sealing surfaces 112, 122 are described in commonly-assigned, co-pending PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US01/11222.


In operation, the surgeon simply utilizes the two opposing handle members 15 and 17 to grasp tissue between jaw members 110 and 120. The surgeon then activates the handswitch 50 to provide electrosurgical energy to each jaw member 110 and 120 to communicate energy through the tissue held therebetween to effect a tissue seal. Once sealed, the surgeon activates the actuating mechanism 40 to advance the cutting blade 85 through the tissue to sever the tissue 400.


While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A pivot assembly for use with an open electrosurgical forceps for sealing tissue, comprising: a pair of insulative shoulders having a first end defining a cap and a second end operably coupled to opposing sides of an insulative hub, the insulative hub including a knife slot defined therein, wherein the insulative hub is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a first configuration and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a second configuration, and wherein the knife slot is configured to: align with a knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a first configuration to permit advancement of the cutting mechanism from a retracted position proximal to the pivot assembly to an advanced position through the pivot assembly and into tissue grasped by the forceps; andmisalign with the knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a second configuration to prevent advancement of the cutting mechanism from the retracted position to the advanced position.
  • 2. A pivot assembly according to claim 1, wherein at least one of a pair of jaw members of the forceps is configured to rotate about one of the shoulders.
  • 3. A pivot assembly according to claim 2, wherein rotation of one of the jaw members translates to rotation of the insulative hub between the first and second configurations.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of claims the benefit to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/553,509, filed Sep. 3, 2009, entitled “OPEN VESSEL SEALING INSTRUMENT WITH PIVOT ASSEMBLY,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (151)
Number Name Date Kind
D249549 Pike Sep 1978 S
D263020 Rau, III Feb 1982 S
D295893 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D295894 Sharkany et al. May 1988 S
D298353 Manno Nov 1988 S
D299413 DeCarolis Jan 1989 S
D343453 Noda Jan 1994 S
D348930 Olson Jul 1994 S
D349341 Lichtman et al. Aug 1994 S
D354564 Medema Jan 1995 S
D358887 Feinberg May 1995 S
D384413 Zlock et al. Sep 1997 S
H1745 Paraschac Aug 1998 H
5810811 Yates et al. Sep 1998 A
D402028 Grimm et al. Dec 1998 S
D408018 McNaughton Apr 1999 S
D416089 Barton et al. Nov 1999 S
D424694 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
D425201 Tetzlaff et al. May 2000 S
H1904 Yates et al. Oct 2000 H
D449886 Tetzlaff et al. Oct 2001 S
D453923 Olson Feb 2002 S
D454951 Bon Mar 2002 S
D457958 Dycus et al. May 2002 S
D457959 Tetzlaff et al. May 2002 S
H2037 Yates et al. Jul 2002 H
D465281 Lang Nov 2002 S
D466209 Bon Nov 2002 S
D493888 Reschke Aug 2004 S
D496997 Dycus et al. Oct 2004 S
D499181 Dycus et al. Nov 2004 S
D502994 Blake, III Mar 2005 S
D509297 Wells Sep 2005 S
D525361 Hushka Jul 2006 S
7101371 Dycus et al. Sep 2006 B2
D531311 Guerra et al. Oct 2006 S
7131970 Moses et al. Nov 2006 B2
D533274 Visconti et al. Dec 2006 S
D533942 Kerr et al. Dec 2006 S
7150097 Sremcich et al. Dec 2006 B2
D535027 James et al. Jan 2007 S
D538932 Malik Mar 2007 S
D541418 Schechter et al. Apr 2007 S
D541611 Aglassinge May 2007 S
D541938 Kerr et al May 2007 S
D545432 Watanabe Jun 2007 S
D547154 Lee Jul 2007 S
7252667 Moses et al. Aug 2007 B2
7255697 Dycus et al. Aug 2007 B2
7267677 Johnson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7329256 Johnson et al. Feb 2008 B2
D564662 Moses et al. Mar 2008 S
D567943 Moses et al. Apr 2008 S
D575395 Hushka Aug 2008 S
D575401 Hixson et al. Aug 2008 S
D582038 Swoyer et al. Dec 2008 S
7491201 Shields et al. Feb 2009 B2
7500975 Cunningham et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513898 Johnson et al. Apr 2009 B2
D617900 Kingsley et al. Jun 2010 S
D617901 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D617902 Twomey et al. Jun 2010 S
D617903 Unger et al. Jun 2010 S
D618798 Olson et al. Jun 2010 S
D621503 Otten et al. Aug 2010 S
D627462 Kingsley Nov 2010 S
D628289 Romero Nov 2010 S
D628290 Romero Nov 2010 S
D630324 Reschke Jan 2011 S
7887536 Johnson et al. Feb 2011 B2
8016827 Chojin Sep 2011 B2
D649249 Guerra Nov 2011 S
D649643 Allen, IV et al. Nov 2011 S
8112871 Brandt et al. Feb 2012 B2
8114122 Nau, Jr. Feb 2012 B2
8133254 Dumbauld et al. Mar 2012 B2
8142473 Cunningham Mar 2012 B2
8162965 Reschke et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162973 Cunningham Apr 2012 B2
D661394 Romero et al. Jun 2012 S
8197479 Olson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8226650 Kerr Jul 2012 B2
8251994 McKenna et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257387 Cunningham Sep 2012 B2
8266783 Brandt et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277446 Heard Oct 2012 B2
8282634 Cunningham et al. Oct 2012 B2
8287536 Mueller et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292886 Kerr et al. Oct 2012 B2
8303582 Cunningham Nov 2012 B2
8317787 Hanna Nov 2012 B2
8323310 Kingsley Dec 2012 B2
8328803 Regadas Dec 2012 B2
8343150 Artale Jan 2013 B2
8343151 Siebrecht et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357159 Romero Jan 2013 B2
8388647 Nau, Jr. et al. Mar 2013 B2
8430876 Kappus et al. Apr 2013 B2
8439911 Mueller May 2013 B2
20020107517 Witt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111624 Witt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030018331 Dycus et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030229344 Dycus et al. Dec 2003 A1
20050107784 Moses et al. May 2005 A1
20050154387 Moses et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060074417 Cunningham et al. Apr 2006 A1
20090149854 Cunningham et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100016857 McKenna et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023009 Moses et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100042143 Cunningham Feb 2010 A1
20100049187 Carlton et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057081 Hanna Mar 2010 A1
20100057082 Hanna Mar 2010 A1
20100057084 Hanna Mar 2010 A1
20100063500 Muszala Mar 2010 A1
20100069903 Allen, IV et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069953 Cunningham et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076427 Heard Mar 2010 A1
20100076430 Romero Mar 2010 A1
20100076431 Allen, IV Mar 2010 A1
20100076432 Horner Mar 2010 A1
20100087816 Roy Apr 2010 A1
20100094287 Cunningham et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100122 Hinton Apr 2010 A1
20100179545 Twomey et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179546 Cunningham Jul 2010 A1
20100249769 Nau, Jr. et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100280511 Rachlin et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110034918 Reschke Feb 2011 A1
20110046623 Reschke Feb 2011 A1
20110054468 Dycus Mar 2011 A1
20110054471 Gerhardt et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110060334 Brandt et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110060335 Harper et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071523 Dickhans Mar 2011 A1
20110077648 Lee et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082494 Kerr et al. Apr 2011 A1
20130103030 Garrison Apr 2013 A1
20130103031 Garrison Apr 2013 A1
20130103035 Horner et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130103041 Regadas Apr 2013 A1
20130116690 Unger May 2013 A1
20130123780 McKenna et al. May 2013 A1
20130123837 Roy et al. May 2013 A1
20130131672 Romero May 2013 A1
20130138101 Kerr May 2013 A1
20130138102 Twomey et al. May 2013 A1
20130138104 Romero May 2013 A1
20130138129 Garrison et al. May 2013 A1
20130144284 Behnke, II et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150842 Nau, Jr. et al. Jun 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (86)
Number Date Country
201299462 Sep 2009 CN
2415263 Oct 1975 DE
02514501 Oct 1976 DE
2627679 Jan 1977 DE
03423356 Jun 1986 DE
03612646 Apr 1987 DE
8712328 Feb 1988 DE
04303882 Feb 1995 DE
04403252 Aug 1995 DE
19515914 Jul 1996 DE
19506363 Aug 1996 DE
29616210 Nov 1996 DE
19608716 Apr 1997 DE
19751106 May 1998 DE
19751108 May 1999 DE
19946527 Jul 2001 DE
20121161 Apr 2002 DE
10045375 Oct 2002 DE
202007009165 Aug 2007 DE
202007009317 Aug 2007 DE
202007009318 Aug 2007 DE
10031773 Nov 2007 DE
202007016233 Jan 2008 DE
19738457 Jan 2009 DE
102004026179 Jan 2009 DE
102008018406 Jul 2009 DE
1 159 926 Dec 2001 EP
1330991 Jul 2003 EP
1486177 Jun 2004 EP
1532932 May 2005 EP
1609430 Dec 2005 EP
1645240 Apr 2006 EP
0875209 May 2006 EP
1707143 Oct 2006 EP
61-501068 Sep 1984 JP
10-24051 Jan 1989 JP
11-47150 Jun 1989 JP
6-502328 Mar 1992 JP
5-5106 Jan 1993 JP
05-40112 Feb 1993 JP
0006030945 Feb 1994 JP
6-285078 Oct 1994 JP
06343644 Dec 1994 JP
07265328 Oct 1995 JP
08056955 Mar 1996 JP
08252263 Oct 1996 JP
8-289895 Nov 1996 JP
8-317934 Dec 1996 JP
8-317936 Dec 1996 JP
09000538 Jan 1997 JP
09010223 Jan 1997 JP
9-122138 May 1997 JP
0010000195 Jan 1998 JP
10-155798 Jun 1998 JP
11-070124 Mar 1999 JP
11-169381 Jun 1999 JP
11-192238 Jul 1999 JP
11244298 Sep 1999 JP
2000-102545 Apr 2000 JP
2000342599 Dec 2000 JP
2000350732 Dec 2000 JP
2001008944 Jan 2001 JP
2001029356 Feb 2001 JP
2001-03400 Apr 2001 JP
2001128990 May 2001 JP
2001-190564 Jul 2001 JP
2002-13652 May 2002 JP
2002-528166 Sep 2002 JP
2003-116871 Apr 2003 JP
2003245285 Sep 2003 JP
2004-517668 Jun 2004 JP
2004-528869 Sep 2004 JP
2005-152663 Jun 2005 JP
2006-015078 Jan 2006 JP
2006-501939 Jan 2006 JP
2006-095316 Apr 2006 JP
2011125195 Jun 2011 JP
401367 Oct 1973 SU
WO-0036986 Jun 2000 WO
WO-0059392 Oct 2000 WO
WO-0115614 Mar 2001 WO
WO-0154604 Aug 2001 WO
WO-02045589 Sep 2002 WO
WO-2005110264 Nov 2005 WO
WO-2006021269 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2008040483 Apr 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (91)
Entry
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003.
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003.
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003.
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001).
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000).
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999.
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878.
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002.
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999.
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801.
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002.
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002.
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999.
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002.
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002.
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831.
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743.
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237.
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001.
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157.
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003.
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001.
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J.Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151.
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001.
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24.
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003.
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004.
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574.
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540.
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000.
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17.
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000.
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999.
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C.
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000.
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C.
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997, James G. Chandler.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998, Randel A. Frazier.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999, Dale F. Schmaltz.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 20, 2000, Thomas P. Ryan.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008, Paul R. Sremeich.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,729, filed Jan. 6, 2012, James D. Allen, IV.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,829, filed Jan. 23, 2012, John R. Twomey.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/357,979, filed Jan. 25, 2012, David M. Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/358,136, filed Jan. 25, 2012, James D. Allen, IV.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/360,925, filed Jan. 30, 2012, James H. Orszulak.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,290, filed Feb. 20, 2012, Eric R. Larson.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,435, filed Feb. 24, 2012, Kim V. Brandt.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,476, filed Feb. 24, 2012, Kim V. Brandt.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,879, filed Mar. 6, 2012, David M. Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,897, filed Mar. 6, 2012, Joanna Ackley.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/421,373, filed Mar. 15, 2012, John R. Twomey.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,325, filed Mar. 26, 2012, William H. Nau, Jr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,924, filed Mar. 29, 2012, Keir Hart.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,577, filed Apr. 17, 2012, David M. Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,455, filed Apr. 30, 2012, Luke Waaler.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,335, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,378, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,397, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Unger.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,410, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Twomey.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/466,274, filed May 8, 2012, Stephen M. Kendrick.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/467,767, filed May 9, 2012, Duane E. Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,775, filed May 14, 2012, James D. Allen, IV.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,589, filed May 29, 2012, Eric R. Larson.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/483,733, filed May 30, 2012, Dennis W. Butcher.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,517, filed Jun. 29, 2012, David N. Heard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,577, filed Jun. 29, 2012, Tony Moua.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,335, filed Dec. 7, 2012, Dumbauld.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, filed Dec. 31, 2012, Siebrecht.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/741,550, filed Jan. 15, 2013, Deborski.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,173, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Larson.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,636, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,762, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,884, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,010, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,823, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,703, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,004, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Twomey.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,945, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Stoddard.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,259, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Garrison.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,273, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Kerr.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,339, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Reschke.
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466.
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties At VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427.
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps” , Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130138104 A1 May 2013 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12553509 Sep 2009 US
Child 13747090 US