1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to forceps used for open surgical procedures. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to an open forceps that applies a combination of mechanical clamping pressure and electrosurgical energy to seal tissue and a knife that is selectively advanceable to sever tissue along the tissue seal.
2. Background of Related Art
A forceps is a plier-like instrument that relies on mechanical action between its jaws to grasp, clamp and constrict vessels or tissue. So-called “open forceps” are commonly used in open surgical procedures whereas “endoscopic forceps” or “laparoscopic forceps” are, as the name implies, used for less invasive endoscopic surgical procedures. Electrosurgical forceps (open or endoscopic) utilize both mechanical clamping action and electrical energy to effect hemostasis by heating tissue and blood vessels to coagulate and/or cauterize tissue.
Certain surgical procedures require more than simply cauterizing tissue and rely on the unique combination of clamping pressure, precise electrosurgical energy control and gap distance (i.e., distance between opposing jaw members when closed about tissue) to “seal” tissue, vessels and certain vascular bundles.
Vessel sealing or tissue sealing is a recently-developed technology that utilizes a unique combination of radiofrequency energy, pressure and gap control to effectively seal or fuse tissue between two opposing jaw members or sealing plates. Vessel or tissue sealing is more than “cauterization” which involves the use of heat to destroy tissue (also called “diathermy” or “electrodiathermy”). Vessel sealing is also more than “coagulation” which is the process of desiccating tissue wherein the tissue cells are ruptured and dried. “Vessel sealing” is defined as the process of liquefying the collagen, elastin and ground substances in the tissue so that the tissue reforms into a fused mass with significantly-reduced demarcation between the opposing tissue structures.
In order to effectively “seal” tissue or vessels, two predominant mechanical parameters should be accurately controlled: 1) the pressure or closure force applied to the vessel or tissue; and 2) the gap distance between the conductive tissue contacting surfaces (electrodes). As can be appreciated, both of these parameters are affected by the thickness of the tissue being sealed. Accurate application of pressure is important for several reasons: to reduce the tissue impedance to a low enough value that allows enough electrosurgical energy through the tissue; to overcome the forces of expansion during tissue heating; and to contribute to the end tissue thickness which is an indication of a good seal. It has been determined that a good seal for certain tissues is optimum between about 0.001 inches and about 0.006 inches.
With respect to smaller vessels or tissue, the pressure applied becomes less relevant and the gap distance between the electrically conductive surfaces becomes more significant for effective sealing. In other words, the chances of the two electrically conductive surfaces touching during activation increases as the tissue thickness and the vessels become smaller.
Commonly owned, U.S. Pat. No. 6,511,480, PCT Patent Application Nos. PCT/US01/11420 and PCT/US01/11218, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/116,824, 10/284,562 and 10/299,650 all describe various open surgical forceps that seal tissue and vessels.
Typically, and particularly with respect to open electrosurgical procedures, once a vessel is sealed, the surgeon has to remove the sealing instrument from the operative site, substitute a new instrument and accurately sever the vessel along the newly formed tissue seal. As can be appreciated, this additional step may be both time consuming (particularly when sealing a significant number of vessels) and may contribute to imprecise separation of the tissue along the sealing line due to the misalignment or misplacement of the severing instrument along the center of the tissue sealing line.
Many endoscopic vessel sealing instruments have been designed that incorporate a knife or blade member that effectively severs the tissue after forming a tissue seal. For example, commonly-owned U.S. application Ser. Nos. 10/116,944 and 10/179,863 describe one such endoscopic instrument that effectively seals and cuts tissue along the tissue seal. Other instruments include blade members or shearing members that simply cut tissue in a mechanical and/or electromechanical manner and are relatively ineffective for vessel sealing purposes.
There exists a need to develop an open electrosurgical forceps that is simple, reliable and inexpensive to manufacture and that effectively seals tissue and vessels and that allows a surgeon to utilize the same instrument to effectively sever the tissue along the newly formed tissue seal.
According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, an open electrosurgical forceps includes a pair of first and second shaft members each having a jaw member disposed at its distal end. The jaw members are movable about a pivot assembly from an open position in spaced relation relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. Each of the jaw members includes an electrically conductive sealing surface for communicating electrosurgical energy through grasped tissue. One or both of the jaw members includes a knife channel defined along its length. The pivot assembly includes a knife slot and is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the open position and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the closed position. An actuator selectively advances the cutting mechanism from a first position to at least one subsequent position.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, an open electrosurgical forceps includes a pair of first and second shaft members each having a jaw member disposed at its distal end. The jaw members are movable about a pivot assembly from an open position in spaced relation relative to one another to a closed position wherein the jaw members cooperate to grasp tissue. The pivot assembly includes a pair of insulative shoulders having a first end defining a cap and a second end operably coupled to opposing sides of an insulative hub. One of the jaw members is configured to rotate about one of the insulative shoulders. Each of the jaw members includes an electrically conductive sealing surface for communicating electrosurgical energy through tissue grasped therebetween to effect a tissue seal. The insulative hub includes a knife slot defined therein. The pivot assembly is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism when the jaw members are disposed in the open position and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism therethrough when the jaw members are disposed in the closed position.
According to another embodiment of the present disclosure, a pivot assembly for use with an open electrosurgical forceps for sealing tissue includes a pair of insulative shoulders having a first end defining a cap and a second end operably coupled to opposing sides of an insulative hub. The insulative hub includes a knife slot defined therein. The insulative hub is configured to prevent reciprocation of a cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a first configuration and to permit reciprocation of the cutting mechanism through the knife slot in a second configuration. The knife slot is configured to align with a knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a first configuration to permit advancement of the cutting mechanism from a retracted position proximal to the pivot assembly to an advanced position through the pivot assembly and into tissue grasped by the forceps. The knife slot is configured to misalign with the knife channel when the forceps is disposed in a second configuration to prevent advancement of the cutting mechanism from the retracted position to the advanced position.
Various embodiments of the subject instrument are described herein with reference to the drawings wherein:
Referring now to
The forceps 10 includes an end effector assembly 100 that attaches to the distal ends 16a and 16b of shafts 12a and 12b, respectively. As explained in more detail below, the end effector assembly 100 includes pair of opposing jaw members 110 and 120 that are pivotably connected about a pivot assembly 65 (See
Each shaft 12a and 12b includes a handle 15 and 17, respectively, disposed at the proximal end 14a and 14b thereof that each define a finger hole 15a and 17a, respectively, therethrough for receiving a finger of the user. Finger holes 15a and 17a facilitate movement of the shafts 12a and 12b relative to one another that, in turn, pivot the jaw members 110 and 120 from an open position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 are disposed in spaced relation relative to one another to a clamping or closed position wherein the jaw members 110 and 120 cooperate to grasp tissue therebetween. As shown in
As best seen in
Jaw member 110 includes an electrically conductive sealing surface 112 that conducts electrosurgical energy of a first potential to tissue. Likewise, jaw member 120 includes an electrically conductive sealing surface 122 that conducts electrosurgical energy of a second potential to tissue.
As best illustrated in
The distal end of the cable 70 may connect to a handswitch 50 to permit the user to selectively apply electrosurgical energy as needed to seal tissue grasped between jaw members 110 and 120. More particularly, the interior of cable 70 houses leads 71a, 71b and 71c that upon activation of the handswitch 50 conduct different electrical potentials from the electrosurgical generator to each of the jaw members 110 and 120 (See
The electrical leads 71a and 71b are electrically connected to the circuit board 52 such that when the switch 50 is depressed, a trigger lead 72 carries the first electrical potential from the circuit board 52 to jaw member 110. The second electrical potential is carried by lead 71c directly from the generator (not shown) to jaw member 120 through a terminal connector 150. As best shown in
The two opposing jaw members 110 and 120 of the end effector assembly 100 are pivotable about pivot assembly 65 from the open position to the closed position for grasping tissue therebetween. Pivot assembly 65 connects through aperture 125 disposed through shaft 12a and aperture 111 disposed through shaft 12b. In this manner, pivot assembly 65 operates to pivotably secure the shafts 12a and 12b during assembly such that the jaw members 110 and 120 are freely pivotable between the open and closed positions.
As shown in
Shoulders 67a, 67b and hub 60 may be ultrasonically welded together at one or more weld points. Alternatively, shoulders 67a, 67b and hub 60 may be mechanically engaged in any other suitable fashion, snap-fit, glued, screwed, etc.
As best seen in
The arrangement of shaft 12b is slightly different from shaft 12a. More particularly, shaft 12b is generally hollow to house the handswitch 50 (and the electrical components associated therewith), an actuating mechanism 40 and the cutting mechanism 80. As best seen in
Interdisposed between the first and second gear racks 42 and 86, respectively, is a pinion gear 45 that mechanically meshes with both gear racks 42 and 86 and converts proximal motion of the trigger 43 into distal translation of the drive rod 89 and vice versa. Distal translation of the drive rod 89 advances the blade 85 of the cutting mechanism 80 through tissue 400 grasped between jaw members 110 and 120, i.e., the cutting mechanism 80, e.g., knife, blade, wire, etc., is advanced through blade slot 61 and, subsequently, through channel 115 upon distal translation of the drive rod 89.
The distal end 81 of the cutting mechanism 80 is dimensioned to reciprocate within a channel 126b defined in the proximal end of jaw member 120 when jaw member 110 and 120 are disposed in a closed position (see
As best shown in
Referring now to
In some embodiments, one of the jaw members, e.g., 120, includes at least one stop member 175 (see
A detailed discussion of these and other envisioned stop members 175 as well as various manufacturing and assembling processes for attaching, disposing, depositing and/or affixing the stop members to the electrically conductive sealing surfaces 112, 122 are described in commonly-assigned, co-pending PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US01/11222.
In operation, the surgeon simply utilizes the two opposing handle members 15 and 17 to grasp tissue between jaw members 110 and 120. The surgeon then activates the handswitch 50 to provide electrosurgical energy to each jaw member 110 and 120 to communicate energy through the tissue held therebetween to effect a tissue seal. Once sealed, the surgeon activates the actuating mechanism 40 to advance the cutting blade 85 through the tissue to sever the tissue 400.
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of particular embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a divisional of claims the benefit to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/553,509, filed Sep. 3, 2009, entitled “OPEN VESSEL SEALING INSTRUMENT WITH PIVOT ASSEMBLY,” the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D249549 | Pike | Sep 1978 | S |
D263020 | Rau, III | Feb 1982 | S |
D295893 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D295894 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D298353 | Manno | Nov 1988 | S |
D299413 | DeCarolis | Jan 1989 | S |
D343453 | Noda | Jan 1994 | S |
D348930 | Olson | Jul 1994 | S |
D349341 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
D354564 | Medema | Jan 1995 | S |
D358887 | Feinberg | May 1995 | S |
D384413 | Zlock et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
H1745 | Paraschac | Aug 1998 | H |
5810811 | Yates et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
D402028 | Grimm et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D408018 | McNaughton | Apr 1999 | S |
D416089 | Barton et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
D424694 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
D425201 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
H1904 | Yates et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
D449886 | Tetzlaff et al. | Oct 2001 | S |
D453923 | Olson | Feb 2002 | S |
D454951 | Bon | Mar 2002 | S |
D457958 | Dycus et al. | May 2002 | S |
D457959 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2002 | S |
H2037 | Yates et al. | Jul 2002 | H |
D465281 | Lang | Nov 2002 | S |
D466209 | Bon | Nov 2002 | S |
D493888 | Reschke | Aug 2004 | S |
D496997 | Dycus et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
D499181 | Dycus et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D502994 | Blake, III | Mar 2005 | S |
D509297 | Wells | Sep 2005 | S |
D525361 | Hushka | Jul 2006 | S |
7101371 | Dycus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
D531311 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
7131970 | Moses et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
D533274 | Visconti et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D533942 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
7150097 | Sremcich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D538932 | Malik | Mar 2007 | S |
D541418 | Schechter et al. | Apr 2007 | S |
D541611 | Aglassinge | May 2007 | S |
D541938 | Kerr et al | May 2007 | S |
D545432 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | S |
D547154 | Lee | Jul 2007 | S |
7252667 | Moses et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255697 | Dycus et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267677 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7329256 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
D564662 | Moses et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D567943 | Moses et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D575395 | Hushka | Aug 2008 | S |
D575401 | Hixson et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D582038 | Swoyer et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
7491201 | Shields et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500975 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513898 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D617900 | Kingsley et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617901 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617902 | Twomey et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617903 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618798 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D621503 | Otten et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
D627462 | Kingsley | Nov 2010 | S |
D628289 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D628290 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D630324 | Reschke | Jan 2011 | S |
7887536 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8016827 | Chojin | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D649249 | Guerra | Nov 2011 | S |
D649643 | Allen, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
8112871 | Brandt et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8114122 | Nau, Jr. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133254 | Dumbauld et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142473 | Cunningham | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162965 | Reschke et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162973 | Cunningham | Apr 2012 | B2 |
D661394 | Romero et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
8197479 | Olson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226650 | Kerr | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251994 | McKenna et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8257387 | Cunningham | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266783 | Brandt et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277446 | Heard | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282634 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8287536 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292886 | Kerr et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303582 | Cunningham | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317787 | Hanna | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323310 | Kingsley | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8328803 | Regadas | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343150 | Artale | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8343151 | Siebrecht et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357159 | Romero | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388647 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8430876 | Kappus et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8439911 | Mueller | May 2013 | B2 |
20020107517 | Witt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111624 | Witt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030018331 | Dycus et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030229344 | Dycus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050107784 | Moses et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050154387 | Moses et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060074417 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090149854 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100016857 | McKenna et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023009 | Moses et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042143 | Cunningham | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049187 | Carlton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057081 | Hanna | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057082 | Hanna | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057084 | Hanna | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063500 | Muszala | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069903 | Allen, IV et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069953 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076427 | Heard | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076430 | Romero | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076431 | Allen, IV | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076432 | Horner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087816 | Roy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094287 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100122 | Hinton | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100179545 | Twomey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179546 | Cunningham | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249769 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280511 | Rachlin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110034918 | Reschke | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046623 | Reschke | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054468 | Dycus | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054471 | Gerhardt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060334 | Brandt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060335 | Harper et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071523 | Dickhans | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077648 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082494 | Kerr et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130103030 | Garrison | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103031 | Garrison | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103035 | Horner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103041 | Regadas | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116690 | Unger | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123780 | McKenna et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123837 | Roy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131672 | Romero | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138101 | Kerr | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138102 | Twomey et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138104 | Romero | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138129 | Garrison et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144284 | Behnke, II et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150842 | Nau, Jr. et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201299462 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2415263 | Oct 1975 | DE |
02514501 | Oct 1976 | DE |
2627679 | Jan 1977 | DE |
03423356 | Jun 1986 | DE |
03612646 | Apr 1987 | DE |
8712328 | Feb 1988 | DE |
04303882 | Feb 1995 | DE |
04403252 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19515914 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
29616210 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19608716 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19751106 | May 1998 | DE |
19751108 | May 1999 | DE |
19946527 | Jul 2001 | DE |
20121161 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10045375 | Oct 2002 | DE |
202007009165 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009317 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009318 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10031773 | Nov 2007 | DE |
202007016233 | Jan 2008 | DE |
19738457 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102004026179 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102008018406 | Jul 2009 | DE |
1 159 926 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1330991 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1486177 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1532932 | May 2005 | EP |
1609430 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1645240 | Apr 2006 | EP |
0875209 | May 2006 | EP |
1707143 | Oct 2006 | EP |
61-501068 | Sep 1984 | JP |
10-24051 | Jan 1989 | JP |
11-47150 | Jun 1989 | JP |
6-502328 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5-5106 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05-40112 | Feb 1993 | JP |
0006030945 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6-285078 | Oct 1994 | JP |
06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07265328 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08056955 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08252263 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-289895 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8-317934 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8-317936 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09000538 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09010223 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9-122138 | May 1997 | JP |
0010000195 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-155798 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-070124 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-169381 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-192238 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11244298 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-102545 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000342599 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000350732 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001008944 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001029356 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-03400 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001128990 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-190564 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-13652 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-528166 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-116871 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003245285 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-517668 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-528869 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-152663 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-015078 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-501939 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-095316 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2011125195 | Jun 2011 | JP |
401367 | Oct 1973 | SU |
WO-0036986 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0059392 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0115614 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0154604 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-02045589 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-2005110264 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006021269 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2008040483 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003. |
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003. |
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003. |
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001). |
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000). |
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999. |
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878. |
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801. |
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002. |
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. |
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002. |
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002. |
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831. |
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743. |
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237. |
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001. |
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157. |
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003. |
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001. |
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J.Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151. |
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001. |
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24. |
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003. |
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574. |
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540. |
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000. |
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17. |
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000. |
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999. |
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C. |
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997, James G. Chandler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998, Randel A. Frazier. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999, Dale F. Schmaltz. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 20, 2000, Thomas P. Ryan. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008, Paul R. Sremeich. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,729, filed Jan. 6, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/355,829, filed Jan. 23, 2012, John R. Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/357,979, filed Jan. 25, 2012, David M. Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/358,136, filed Jan. 25, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/360,925, filed Jan. 30, 2012, James H. Orszulak. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/400,290, filed Feb. 20, 2012, Eric R. Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,435, filed Feb. 24, 2012, Kim V. Brandt. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,476, filed Feb. 24, 2012, Kim V. Brandt. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,879, filed Mar. 6, 2012, David M. Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,897, filed Mar. 6, 2012, Joanna Ackley. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/421,373, filed Mar. 15, 2012, John R. Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,325, filed Mar. 26, 2012, William H. Nau, Jr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,924, filed Mar. 29, 2012, Keir Hart. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,577, filed Apr. 17, 2012, David M. Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,455, filed Apr. 30, 2012, Luke Waaler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,335, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,378, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,397, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Unger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,410, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/466,274, filed May 8, 2012, Stephen M. Kendrick. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/467,767, filed May 9, 2012, Duane E. Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,775, filed May 14, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,589, filed May 29, 2012, Eric R. Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/483,733, filed May 30, 2012, Dennis W. Butcher. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,517, filed Jun. 29, 2012, David N. Heard. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,577, filed Jun. 29, 2012, Tony Moua. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,335, filed Dec. 7, 2012, Dumbauld. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, filed Dec. 31, 2012, Siebrecht. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/741,550, filed Jan. 15, 2013, Deborski. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,173, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,636, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,762, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,884, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,010, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,823, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,703, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,004, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,945, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Stoddard. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,259, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,273, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/853,339, filed Mar. 29, 2013, Reschke. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties At VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps” , Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130138104 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12553509 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 13747090 | US |