This invention relates broadly to the art of truss and joist construction. More particularly the invention relates to trusses which combine the benefits of open web truss construction with closed web joist construction, there by providing construction site variable length adjustment while conserving the factory built structural integrity.
Current truss designs envision a variety of broad design types, but they generally fall into two broad categories, open or closed web design. Both current designs have their problems.
The closed truss is the most common variable length truss. Closed truss designs suffer from several construction problems. First, the design requires a great deal more material, having a closed volume. Second, the design has difficulty with respect to the passage of ducting, plumbing, wiring, etc. within the area defined by the interior of the truss since it is solid and must be cut. This provides for two problems. First, the strength of the truss may be affected by the cutting. Second, a great deal of time and equipment may be necessary in order to manufacture this space for utility passage. Other related problems may exist as a result of these general problems including the need for engineering analysis to determine where holes may be located and where web reinforcements are required.
Two by ten or two by twelve joists made of solid wood are also very common. A major problems associated with these are that they require old growth timber to provide large enough lumber. In addition, when oriented edgewise, they provide an inferior nailing surface compared with that provided by truss chords oriented flatwise. This is particularly important when adding subfloors and ceilings to the joists since only an approximate location of the supporting member can be found. In addition, span lengths are greatly diminished by the load carrying properties of these timbers.
A variety of open web truss designs are known. However, design of most open web trusses requires the use of metal due to structural requirements of the truss. The use of a large number of metal and wood components increases the complexity of truss component alignment and assembly as well as increases costs. Additionally, typical open web truss designs require that the manufactured length of the truss closely match the as-built span of the building because the truss configuration (and metal truss components in particular) makes field length adjustment or trimming nearly impossible.
There are a number of hybrids that combine the features of open web truss center configuration with closed web trimmable end configuration. The products typically exhibit a degree of structural deficiency in completing the transition between solid web joist end and open web truss center. The transitioning problem is caused because the joist end behaves structurally like a beam and resists imposed loads with bending member stresses, whereas the truss center behaves structurally like a truss and resists imposed loads with axial member stresses. The most common limitations of this difficult transition is a requirement that the trusses be installed with a certain designated side up, or trim is limited to a small amount and perhaps requiring that both ends be trimmed equally.
The described structure provides a lightweight, yet strong open web trimmable truss formed from a wood containing material. The truss assembly includes a pair of chord members. The chord members each include a mortise and a trimmable end block groove. A web element extends between the chord members. Tenons disposed on opposite ends of the web element engage with said mortise. The outer most web elements in the truss assembly also include a web element groove. Additionally, the trimmable truss includes a trimmable end block. The trimmable end block has opposed trimmable end block chord edges that engage the chord members via trimmable end block groove. The trimmable end block also has a web element edge that engages the web element groove. Generally, the truss assembly is constructed from a wood containing material.
The trimmable truss assembly also includes a self locking joint. The self locking joint is formed by the interaction of a mortise and a pair of “mated” web element tenons. A first web element includes tenons formed by a first tenon seat cut and a first tenon square cut. Further, a second web element includes a second tenon defined by a second tenon seat cut and a second tenon square cut. When mated, the first tenon is adjacent the second tenon and both are within the mortise. The mortise may be either a single taper mortise or a double taper mortise.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention provides an open web trimmable truss that utilizes a novel, self-centering and locking joint. By way of overview and with reference to
The trimmable truss 20 is constructed from various wood containing materials. A suitable example of the type of wood containing material the chord members 22 and web elements 28 are constructed from laminated strand lumber such as TimberStrand® sold by Weyerhaeuser Company. The trimmable end block 30 may be any known engineered panel, such as, without limitation, plywood or oriented strand board. It will be appreciated however that other materials may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Chord members 22 include two types of cutouts. A mortise 36 is configured to receive an interlocking pair of tenons 40, described in more detail below. The mortise 36 may or may not include a bore 58 extending through the chord member 22. Additionally, the chord member 22 includes a trimmable end block groove 32 configured to receive a trimmable end block chord edge 48 of the trimmable end block 30. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the trimmable end block groove 32 may be a tapered groove if the trimmable end block edge 48 is beveled. Likewise, if the trimmable end block edge 48 is not beveled, the trimmable end block groove 32 may be untapered. With regards to the trimmable truss 20, both chord members 22 contain the same cutouts. As formed, the spacing of one chord member 22 is laterally offset from the other to facilitate formation of the trimmable truss 22.
As best seen in
As best seen in
A transition zone 49 is also present when the truss 20 is under loading. The transition zone 49 is that part of the truss 20 where the truss 20 switches from behaving like a beam to behaving like a truss 20. The transition zone 49, in general terms, refers to interaction between the trimmable end block web element edge 50 and the web element groove 60 of the outermost web element 28a.
Under loading illustrated, the truss 20 places the outer most web element 28a in tension as illustrated by resultant tension load R2 and web member 28 under compression as illustrated by, opposite but equal, resultant tension load R1. This resultant tension load R2 gets transferred to the trimmable end block 30 via a tension shear between the trimmable end block web element edge 50 and the web element groove 60 of the outermost web element 28a.
It will be appreciated that truss 20 may be used with either chord member 22 on top. As such, the outer most web element 28a may be either in tension or compression, depending upon how the truss 20 is utilized. In either configuration, the tension or compression within the outer most web element 28a is transferred to the trimmable end block 30 as described above. Those skilled in the art, will appreciate that without this transfer zone 49, the loading in the outer most web element 28a would be carried into the chord member 22. The result of such an arrangement would lead to either the web element wanting to pull out of engagement with the chord member 22 or wanting to drive further into the chord member 22. Both of which are undesirable conditions in a truss 20.
In this embodiment, mortise 36a also includes a locking taper 37. The direction of this taper is perpendicular to the main axis of the chord member 22a, or along the Y-axis as indicated in the FIGURE. The locking taper 39 is typically cut at about a 5 degree angle relative to a plane passing vertically into the plane of the paper along the X-axis. However, a mortise 36a having a locking taper 37 cut at an angle above or below 5 degrees is also considered within the scope of this invention.
The locking taper 37 is configured to taper inwardly. As best seen in
With respect to all embodiments and as discussed above, the web element 28 includes a tenon 40 at each end. For simplicity reasons only we will limit our description to a single tenon 40 with the understanding that discussion of one tenon 40 applies equally to all tenons 40 for a given embodiment. For all embodiments, one tenon's orientation on the web element 28 relative to the other tenon's orientation is best described as the tenon profile on opposite ends of a web member 28 are identical in profile but with opposing orientation. This orientation can be visualized as rotated 180 degrees in the plane of the trimmable truss 20 about the centroid of the finished web element 28.
The square cut 44 is made at an angle of about 90 degrees relative to the longitudinal axis of the web element 28. The square cut 44 is only formed on a single side of the web element 28 per tenon 40. The square cut 44 may be made to form a substantially right angle tenon edge profile 56a. Conversely, the tenon edge profile 56b may be a rounded, or fillet type cut as depicted best in
The width of the single taper mortise 36b is indicated as M3. With reference to
With specific reference to
When formed, the web elements 28, the trimmable end blocks 30 and the chord members 22 are additionally secured together by the application of an adhesive, such as a resin. The adhesive is typically an alkaline phenolic resin. However, other adhesives may be used, such as, without limitation, water-soluble and non-water-soluble alkaline and acidic phenolic resins, resorcinol-formaldehyde resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, isocyanate resins, melamine, and epoxy resin.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.