Currently, users may open network-enabled electronic documents by selecting links. Some links cause a specific software application associated with the electronic document to load the electronic document. Some other links cause a network browser to render the electronic document.
Assume, for example, that a sales manager wants to enable his or her salesmen to be able to open an electronic document to record their sales. The sales manager may send an email to the salesmen with two links to the electronic document: one for opening the electronic document using a specific software application associated with the electronic document; and one for opening the electronic document with a network browser.
System(s), method(s), and/or technique(s) (“tools”) are described that enable a user to open a network-enabled electronic document in either a specific software application associated with the electronic document or a network browser. In some cases the tools do so using a single link. On selection of the link, if the user's computing device has access to the specific software application, the tools may load the electronic document using that application. Or, if the user's computing device does not have access to the specific software application, the tools may render the electronic document with a network browser. In so doing, the tools may make the document available to a larger set of potential users through their browsers, allow users the convenience of accessing the document within a browser, optimize users' experience in working with the document through a specific software application, or provide a simpler opening procedure.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The same numbers are used throughout the disclosure and figures to reference like components and features.
The following document describes tools capable of enabling a user to open a network-enabled electronic document in either a specific software application associated with the electronic document or a network browser. The tools may decide between these options based on: whether the user's computing device has access to the specific software application or a version of that application capable of fully implementing the electronic document's functions; a pre-selected setting or default; or the user's selection, among others.
An environment in which the tools may enable these and other actions is set forth below in a section entitled Exemplary Operating Environment. This section is followed by another section describing exemplary ways in which the tools open a network-enabled electronic document responsive to the electronic document being selected with a link in a document library, entitled Selecting an Electronic Document with a Link in a Document Library. Another section follows and describes exemplary ways in which the tools open a network-enabled electronic document responsive to the electronic document being selected with other types of links, entitled Selecting an Electronic Document with a Link in a Webpage, Email, or Document. A final section, entitled Determining Where to Open Electronic Documents, sets forth an exemplary process by which the tools may determine whether to open an electronic document in a network browser or a specific software application. These section titles are provided for the reader's convenience and do not alter or limit the scope of the entitled sections.
Before describing the tools in detail, the following discussion of an exemplary operating environment is provided to assist the reader in understanding one way in which various inventive aspects of the tools may be employed. The environment described below constitutes but one example and is not intended to limit application of the tools to any one particular operating environment. Other environments may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
The detection module is capable of detecting whether or not the client computing device has access to the specific software application and, in some cases, the specific software application's version and capabilities. It may be part of or separate from the network browser and comprise script and/or an ActiveX module. The specific software application is capable of opening a specific type of electronic document, such as an Excel™ application that is capable of editing Excel™-type spreadsheet electronic documents or an Infopath™ application that is capable of editing Infopath™-form types of electronic documents. The specific software application may also comprise or be affected by a document loading module 114, which is capable of causing an electronic document to be loaded and opened within the specific software application.
The operating environment also comprises a network 116 and server(s) 118 (“servers”). The network enables communication between the client and the servers, and may comprise a global or local wired or wireless network, such as the Internet or a company's intranet.
The servers comprise a single server or multiple servers, such as a server farm, though the servers may also comprise additional server or non-server entities capable of communicating with other entities or of governing the individual servers. The servers are shown with three separate servers 118a, 118b, and 118c operating serially or in parallel to service requests.
The servers comprise servers' processors 120 and server computer-readable media 122. The server processors are capable of accessing and/or executing the server computer-readable media. The server computer-readable media comprises or has access to a request handler 124, and a network electronic document application 126. The request handler is capable of receiving or intercepting requests, such as requests generated responsive to a user selecting to open an electronic document. The network electronic document application is capable of servicing an electronic document, such as by creating and providing HTML (“HyperText Markup Language”) enabling the network browser to render the electronic document and receiving and saving edits to the electronic document.
The following discussion describes exemplary ways in which the tools open a network-enabled electronic document in either a specific software application associated with the electronic document or a network browser responsive to the electronic document being selected with a link in a document library. A document library may comprise, for example, a web page containing a collection of electronic documents and a way in which to select a link to each of these documents. This discussion refers to particular elements, such as elements of operating environment 100 of
When a user selects a link, such as a hyperlink in a document library to open an electronic document, the tools determine whether or not a specific software application associated with the electronic document is available on or accessible by the user's computing device (e.g., it is installed). The tools also determine whether or not the specific software application is of a version compatible with the electronic document. If both of these are true, the tools may load the electronic document on the user's computing device with the specific software application. In some cases there is an indication (e.g., a previously selected setting) indicating that the electronic document should only be opened in the network browser. In these cases the tools may forgo these actions and immediately open the electronic document in the network browser.
If the specific software application associated with the electronic document is not accessible or is accessible but of an incompatible version, the tools may also open the electronic document with the user's network browser. To do so, the tools may, in some cases, cause the network browser to navigate to a page with appropriate query parameters sufficient to cause the browser to open the electronic document on that page.
The tools may behave in either of these manners regardless of whether the user is selecting to create a new electronic document or is selecting an existing electronic document. Also, when the user is done with the electronic document, the tools may return the user to the page that was used to open the document (e.g., the document library page or other page through which the link was selected). An exemplary process performing some of the above actions is set forth immediately below.
Block 202 receives a selection through a link to a document library for a network-enabled electronic document. A user, for instance, may click on an icon (e.g., a button graphic) associated with, or text for, a universal resource locator (URL) to select the electronic document in the document library.
Block 204 determines whether the electronic document is accessible through the document library, such as by being on a shared enterprise server (e.g., a SharePoint™ server). If yes, the tools proceed to block 206. If no, the tools proceed to block 212.
Block 206 determines whether the document library has a previously selected or default setting indicating that the electronic document should be opened in the network browser regardless of whether or not the specific software application associated with the electronic document is accessible and of a compatible version. If yes (it does have a setting), the tools proceed to block 208. If no, the tools proceed to block 210.
Block 208 redirects the network browser to a page on which the electronic document may be opened. Here the tools redirect the network browser to a dynamic server-generated browser page that is capable of opening the electronic document. This dynamic server-generated browser page may be generated using asp, aspx, jsp, php, and cgi technologies, for example, which permit the document to be displayed as part of the dynamic server-generated browser page. Here the tools use a URL having the URL for the electronic document along with query parameters. These query parameters indicate whether the document library is set for the electronic document to be opened in the browser even if the specific software application is accessible. These query parameters may contain an encoded server-relative path to the electronic document's file and an encoded absolute path to the page that was used to open the file. The absolute path parameter may later be used by the network browser to navigate back to that page when the electronic document is closed.
Block 210 determines whether the user has a right to open the electronic document in the specific software application. The tools may determine this based on a security setting in the file for the electronic document, which may be referenced in the path of the request. If no, the tools proceed to block 208 and redirect the network browser. If yes, the tools proceed to block 212.
Block 212 determines if the specific software application associated with the network-enable electronic document is accessible and, in some cases, whether it is of a compatible version. Here block 212 determines whether or not a document loading module associated with the specific software application is installed (e.g., an ActiveX module) on the user's computing device. If yes, the tools proceed to block 214. If no, the tools proceed to block 208.
Block 214 opens the electronic document with the specific software application. Here the tools use the document loading module to open the electronic document in the specific software application. The document loading module may receive, as a parameter, the URL for the electronic document. With this parameter, the specific software application requests the file for the electronic document in such a way that the server can distinguish the request from a network browsers request. In one particular embodiment, the server distinguishes the request with a translate F HTTP header, receives the file, and opens the electronic document.
The following discussion describes exemplary ways in which the tools open a network-enabled electronic document in either a specific software application associated with the electronic document or a network browser responsive to the electronic document being selected with a link in a webpage, email, or document. This discussion refers to particular elements, such as elements of operating environment 100 of
When a user selects a link to open an electronic document through a webpage, email, document (e.g., a word-processing document), or the like, the tools determine whether or not a specific software application associated with the electronic document is accessible by the user's computing device (e.g., it is installed) and is of a version compatible with the electronic document.
If these are both true, the tools cause the specific software application to open the electronic document. If these are not both true, the tools cause the network browser to open the electronic document. To open the electronic document using the network browser, the tools cause the network browser to navigate to a page with appropriate query parameters sufficient to cause the browser to open the electronic document on that page.
The tools may behave in either of these manners regardless of whether the user is selecting a new or existing electronic document. When the user is done with the electronic document, the tools may return the user to the document library page or other page through which the user selected the link. An exemplary process performing some of the above actions is set forth immediately below.
Block 302 receives a selection through a link in a webpage, email, or other document and for a network-enabled electronic document. A user, for instance, may click on a universal resource locator (URL) link in an email to select the electronic document.
Block 304 determines whether or not the user has a right to open the electronic document at least in the network browser. The tools may do so through information in the file for the electronic document, such as security settings and the identity of the user or machine through which the user selected the link. If block 304 determines that the user does not have this right, the tools may end the process and/or provide an error message (not shown).
Block 306 determines whether or not the electronic document should only be opened in the network browser. The tools may determine that the electronic document should be loaded in the network browser even if the user's computing device has access to the specific software application based on a default setting or a previously selected setting. If yes (it should be opened in the network browser), the tools proceed to block 308. If no, the tools proceed to block 310.
Block 308 renders the electronic document through the network browser. The tools may do so using a server having software tailored to the electronic document, such as an electronic-form-ready server for an electronic-form type of electronic document or a spreadsheet-ready server for an electronic document comprising spreadsheets.
Block 310 determines whether the user has a right to open the electronic document in the specific software application. The tools may determine this based on a security setting in the file for the electronic document, which may be referenced in the path of the request. If yes, the tools proceed to block 312. If no, the tools proceed to block 308 and render the electronic document.
Block 312 determines whether an identifier for the specific software application is present and, if so, whether it indicates a version equal to or greater than the electronic document's version. The tools may do so based on query parameters in the header. These query parameters may include those noted as part of process 200 above. If no, the tools proceed to block 308 and render the electronic document. If yes, the tools proceed to block 314.
Block 314 opens the electronic document with the specific software application. The tools may receive, as a parameter, the URL for the electronic document. The tools may then return the electronic document's content such that it will be opened by the specific software application. Or it may then compute a URL for a redirect to the specific software application or append query parameters to the URL for the selected link. These parameters may include those noted as part of process 200. This URL or appended URL is used by the tools to launch the specific software application either with a 302 redirect to the appended URL or by passing the URL to the document loading module.
The following discussion describes these and alternative ways in which the tools determine where to open a network-enabled electronic document. By way of example, this discussion refers to particular elements, such as elements of operating environment 100 of
Block 402 intercepts a request generated by a user selecting a link to open an electronic document. The link may be to open an electronic document in a document library as set forth in process 200 or a link in a webpage, email, or other document as set forth in process 300. In some cases selection of this link, if it were not intercepted, would cause the specific software application to open the electronic document. In some others, if it were not intercepted, this selection would cause the network browser to open the electronic document.
This link may include information indicating what version or capabilities are needed in a specific software application associated with the requested electronic document to enable the functionality of the electronic document. Alternatively or conjunctively, the detection module may inspect the contents of the electronic document to determine the document's version or capabilities.
Block 404 determines whether or not the user's computing device has access to a specific software application associated with the requested electronic document or whether the electronic document was previously selected to be opened only in a network browser. Block 404 may also determine the capabilities of the specific software application and/or its version.
Here the request handler asks detection module 110 whether the user's computing device has access to the specific software application and for its version. The detection module receives this query for information from the request handler, shown at arrow 2. The detection module determines whether the user's client computing device has access to the specific software application (e.g., it is installed) and, if it does, the application's version. The detection module then provides this information, shown at arrow 3, which is received by the request handler. This communication between the request handler and the detection module may be indirect, such as through the network browser.
Block 404 may decide whether or not to make this determination based on the request having information indicating that the requested electronic document may possibly be opened using remote resources (e.g., network electronic document application 126) or local resources (e.g., specific software application 112). In some cases this information is a particular extension in a URL for the request, such as an “.xls” extension for a spreadsheet type of electronic document or an “.xml” extension for an electronic-form type of electronic document. In some other cases, this information is or is derived from meta-information promoted from the document to a filing system or document library.
Block 404 may also determine that the electronic document was previously selected to be opened only in the network browser based on having information indicating that the requested electronic document's URL comprises a particular parameter. This permits designers or other users of an electronic document to ensure that the electronic document is only opened in the network browser even if the user's client computing device has access to the specific software application associated with that electronic document.
Process 400 proceeds to block 406 if the user's client computing device does not have access (and/or an appropriate version or capabilities) to the specific software application or is previously set to be opened by the network browsers. Alternatively, an additional selection may be requested from the user, such as a dialog box asking whether or not the user wishes to open the electronic document in either the network browser or the specific software application (not shown). A user's selection to open the electronic document in the network browser may be determinative. Otherwise, the process proceeds to block 408.
Block 406 causes the electronic document to be opened in a network browser. If the request would have caused the electronic document to be opened in the specific software application—if it were not intercepted—the request handler alters the request effective to enable the network browser to handle the request. This dynamic alteration to the request causes data to be sent to the user's client computing device using a different format than were it not altered. Here the request handler alters the request and submits it to the network electronic document application effective to cause the network electronic document application to send data in a format acceptable for direct rendering in the network browser (e.g., HTML), rather than in the format used by the specific software application (e.g., the format corresponding to the physical file for the electronic document). This is shown in
Block 408 causes a specific software application associated with the selected electronic document to open the electronic document. The request handler may instruct the detection module or document loading module 114 to request a physical file (e.g., a non-rendering file) for the electronic document in a format usable by the specific software application. This is shown at arrow 4b. The request handler may do so by dynamically altering the request from the user's selection and sending this altered request to the detection module or document loading module and telling it to make a request using this altered request. The request handler alters the user's request by appending query parameters to it (such as those noted in process 200 or 300 above).
Here the detection module receives these instructions and makes a request for a physical file. The detection module makes the request of the network electronic document application, though it may make the request of any source (local or remote) capable of supplying the physical file (arrow 5b). This physical file is effective to enable the specific software application to open the electronic document on the user's client computing device. In response, the network electronic document application provides the physical file to the detection module at arrow 6b.
The detection module receives the physical file and causes the document loading module to load the physical file and the specific software application effective to cause the specific software application to open the electronic document. This is shown at arrows 7b and 8b. The document loading module may know to cause the specific software application to load the physical file based on information provided in the physical file, such as its format being compatible with the specific software application but not with the network browser.
In cases where the link is selected by the user through the network browser, such as in a webpage, the tools may remain or return to that webpage. For instance, if a user selects a link in a webpage opened in the network browser, the tools may open the electronic document with the specific software application or within the webpage.
Each of the above acts, includes blocks of process 200, 300, and 400, may all be performed without user interaction other than the user's selection of a link to open an electronic document. This enables a user, with as little as one selection of one link, to open an electronic document in either a network browser or a specific software application, as appropriate. A user may not need, for example, to know whether his or her client computing device has access to the specific software application, that the specific software application is of an appropriate version or capabilities, or that the electronic document should be opened in the network browser even if the user's device has an appropriate specific software application installed.
The above-described systems, methods, and/or techniques enable a user to open a network-enabled electronic document in either a specific software application associated with the electronic document or a network browser. In some cases the user may do so through selection of a single link. Although the systems and methods have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the systems and methods defined in the appended claims are not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed systems and methods.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4514800 | Gruner et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4641274 | Swank | Feb 1987 | A |
4674040 | Barker et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4723211 | Barker et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4739477 | Barker et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4815029 | Barker et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4847749 | Collins et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4910663 | Bailey | Mar 1990 | A |
4933880 | Borgendale et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4962475 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5072412 | Henderson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5179703 | Evans | Jan 1993 | A |
5182709 | Makus | Jan 1993 | A |
5187786 | Densmore et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191645 | Carlucci et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195183 | Miller et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204947 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5206951 | Khoyi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5218672 | Morgan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5237680 | Adams et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249275 | Srivastava | Sep 1993 | A |
5274803 | Dubin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5297249 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297283 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5313631 | Kao | May 1994 | A |
5313646 | Hendricks et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317686 | Salas et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333317 | Dann | Jul 1994 | A |
5339423 | Beitel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339424 | Fushimi | Aug 1994 | A |
5341478 | Travis, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5369766 | Nakano et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369778 | San Soucie et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371675 | Greif et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377323 | Vasudevan | Dec 1994 | A |
5381547 | Flug et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390325 | Miller | Feb 1995 | A |
5396623 | McCall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5408665 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1995 | A |
5410688 | Williams et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412772 | Monson | May 1995 | A |
5434975 | Allen | Jul 1995 | A |
5436637 | Gayraud et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440744 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446842 | Schaeffer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5459865 | Heninger et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5481722 | Skinner | Jan 1996 | A |
5504898 | Klein | Apr 1996 | A |
5517655 | Collins et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535389 | Elder et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542070 | LeBlanc et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550976 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551035 | Arnold et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572643 | Judson | Nov 1996 | A |
5572648 | Bibayan | Nov 1996 | A |
5577252 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581686 | Koppolu et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581760 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602996 | Powers, III et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608720 | Biegel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627979 | Chang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630126 | Redpath | May 1997 | A |
5634121 | Tracz et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640544 | Onodera et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659729 | Nielsen | Aug 1997 | A |
5664178 | Sinofsky | Sep 1997 | A |
5669005 | Curbow et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682536 | Atkinson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689703 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5706501 | Horikiri et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717939 | Bricklin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721824 | Taylor | Feb 1998 | A |
5740439 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742504 | Meyer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745683 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751956 | Kirsch | May 1998 | A |
5758184 | Lucovsky et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758358 | Ebbo | May 1998 | A |
5761408 | Kolawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761683 | Logan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764984 | Loucks | Jun 1998 | A |
5764985 | Smale | Jun 1998 | A |
5778372 | Cordell et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784555 | Stone | Jul 1998 | A |
5798757 | Smith | Aug 1998 | A |
5801701 | Koppolu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802304 | Stone | Sep 1998 | A |
5806079 | Rivette et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815830 | Anthony | Sep 1998 | A |
5826265 | Van Huben et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835777 | Staelin | Nov 1998 | A |
5838906 | Doyle et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842018 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845077 | Fawcett | Dec 1998 | A |
5845090 | Collins, III et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854630 | Nielsen | Dec 1998 | A |
5859973 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862372 | Morris et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864819 | De Armas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890171 | Blumer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907704 | Gudmundson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911776 | Guck | Jun 1999 | A |
5915112 | Boutcher | Jun 1999 | A |
5922072 | Hutchinson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929858 | Shibata et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940075 | Mutschler, III et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950010 | Hesse et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956481 | Walsh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960199 | Brodsky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963964 | Nielsen | Oct 1999 | A |
5982370 | Kamper | Nov 1999 | A |
5987480 | Donohue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991710 | Papineni | Nov 1999 | A |
5995103 | Ashe | Nov 1999 | A |
5999740 | Rowley | Dec 1999 | A |
6014135 | Fernandes | Jan 2000 | A |
6016520 | Facq et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018743 | Xu | Jan 2000 | A |
6026379 | Haller et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026416 | Kanerva et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031989 | Cordell | Feb 2000 | A |
6035297 | Van Huben et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035309 | Dauerer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044205 | Reed et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052710 | Saliba et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054987 | Richardson | Apr 2000 | A |
6067558 | Wendt et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072870 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078326 | Kilmer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078327 | Liman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078924 | Ainsbury et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081610 | Dwork et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084585 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088708 | Burch et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091417 | Lefkowitz | Jul 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098081 | Heidorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108637 | Blumenau | Aug 2000 | A |
6108783 | Krawczyk et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122647 | Horowitz | Sep 2000 | A |
6144969 | Inokuchi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151624 | Teare et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154128 | Wookey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163772 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167521 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167523 | Strong | Dec 2000 | A |
6192367 | Hawley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195661 | Filepp et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199204 | Donohue | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209128 | Gerard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216152 | Wong et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219698 | Iannucci et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225996 | Gibb et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235027 | Herzon | May 2001 | B1 |
6253366 | Mutschler, III | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253374 | Dresevic et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263313 | Milsted et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266810 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275227 | DeStefano | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275599 | Adler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281896 | Alimpich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282711 | Halpern et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286033 | Kishinsky et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292897 | Gennaro et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297819 | Furst | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308179 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311271 | Gennaro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314565 | Kenner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321259 | Ouellette et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321334 | Jerger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327628 | Anuff et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331864 | Coco et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342907 | Petty et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343302 | Graham | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345256 | Milsted et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345361 | Jerger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347323 | Garber et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349408 | Smith | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353926 | Parthesarathy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356906 | Lippert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357038 | Scouten | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366907 | Fanning et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366912 | Wallent et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369840 | Barnett et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369841 | Salomon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374402 | Schmeidler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381742 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381743 | Mutschler, III | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389434 | Rivette | May 2002 | B1 |
6393456 | Ambler et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396488 | Simmons et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408311 | Baisley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415335 | Lowery et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421070 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421656 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425125 | Fries et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429885 | Saib et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434563 | Pasquali et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434564 | Ebert | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6442563 | Bacon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442755 | Lemmons et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446110 | Lection et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449617 | Quinn et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460058 | Koppulu | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6470349 | Heninger | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473800 | Jerger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476828 | Burkett et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476833 | Moshfeghi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477544 | Bolosky | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480860 | Monday | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487566 | Sundaresan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493702 | Adar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502101 | Verprauskus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502103 | Frey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505230 | Mohan et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505300 | Chan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6507856 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516322 | Meredith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519617 | Wanderski et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
RE38070 | Spies et al. | Apr 2003 | E |
6546546 | Van Doorn | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549221 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549878 | Lowry et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549922 | Srivastava et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553402 | Makarios et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560620 | Ching | May 2003 | B1 |
6560640 | Smethers | May 2003 | B2 |
6563514 | Samar | May 2003 | B1 |
6571253 | Thompson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578144 | Gennaro et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581061 | Graham | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584548 | Bourne et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585778 | Hind et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598219 | Lau | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604099 | Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606606 | Starr | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609200 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611822 | Beams et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611840 | Baer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613098 | Sorge et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615276 | Mastrianni et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629109 | Koshisaka | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631357 | Perkowski | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631379 | Cox | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6631497 | Jamshidi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631519 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635089 | Burkett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636845 | Chau et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643633 | Chau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643684 | Malkin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654737 | Nunez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658417 | Stakutis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658622 | Aiken et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668369 | Krebs et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678717 | Schneider | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691230 | Bardon | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691281 | Sorge et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701434 | Rohatgi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711679 | Guski et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725426 | Pavlov | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735721 | Morrow et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6748385 | Rodkin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751777 | Bates | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760723 | Oshinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763496 | Hennings et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772139 | Smith, III | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6772165 | O'Carroll | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774926 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779154 | Nussbaum et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799299 | Li et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816849 | Halt, Jr. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845380 | Su et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845499 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848078 | Birsan et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6871220 | Rajan et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874130 | Baweja, et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876996 | Czajkowski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889359 | Conner et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901403 | Bata et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6931532 | Davis et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941510 | Ozzie et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948133 | Haley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963875 | Moore et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968503 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968505 | Stoll et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993714 | Kaler et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996776 | Makely et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996781 | Myers et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003719 | Rosenoff et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003722 | Rothchiller et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028268 | Conley, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036072 | Sulistio et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039875 | Khalfay et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062764 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086009 | Resnick et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107282 | Yalamanchi | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114128 | Koppolu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7203937 | Kyle et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7346703 | Cope | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20010022592 | Alimpich et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010024195 | Hayakawa | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037345 | Kiernan et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054004 | Powers | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056429 | Moore et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056460 | Sahota et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010746 | Jilk, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026441 | Kutay et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026461 | Kutay et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032768 | Voskuil | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035581 | Reynar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040469 | Pramberger | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057297 | Grimes et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020100027 | Binding et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103824 | Koppolu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112224 | Cox | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133484 | Chau et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152244 | Dean et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156772 | Chau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156929 | Hekmatpour | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169789 | Kutay et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174401 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184219 | Preisig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188597 | Kern et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188613 | Chakraborty et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196288 | Emrani | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198891 | Li et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198935 | Crandall, Sr. et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004951 | Chokshi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007000 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014397 | Chau et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018668 | Britton et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025732 | Prichard | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037303 | Bodlaender et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043986 | Creamer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046665 | Ilin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051243 | Lemmons et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055828 | Koch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056198 | Al-Azzawe et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061386 | Brown et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030120578 | Newman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120659 | Sridhar | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120671 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120686 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140132 | Champagne et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158897 | Ben-Natan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167277 | Hejlsberg et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182268 | Lal | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187930 | Ghaffar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189593 | Yarvin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204511 | Brundage et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204814 | Elo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205615 | Marappan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212664 | Breining et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225768 | Chaudhuri et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225829 | Pena et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226132 | Tondreau et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233374 | Spinola et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030237046 | Parker et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030237047 | Borson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002939 | Arora et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003031 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010752 | Chan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024842 | Witt | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044961 | Pesenson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059754 | Barghout et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073565 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093596 | Koyano | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117769 | Lauzon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123277 | Schrader et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146199 | Berkner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040163041 | Engel | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186762 | Beaven et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187076 | Ki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205473 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205571 | Adler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205592 | Huang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205605 | Adler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205653 | Hadfield et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221245 | Chickles et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004893 | Sangroniz | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005248 | Rockey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015732 | Vedula et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027757 | Kiessig et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076049 | Qubti et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102370 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171746 | Thalhammer-Reyero | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198086 | Moore et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223320 | Brintzenhofe et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060020586 | Prompt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026534 | Ruthfield et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031757 | Vincent, III | Feb 2006 | A9 |
20060036995 | Chickles et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041838 | Khan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085409 | Rys et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0841615 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0961197 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1076290 | Feb 2001 | EP |
63085960 | Apr 1988 | JP |
401173140 | Jul 1989 | JP |
4225466 | Aug 1992 | JP |
5314152 | Nov 1993 | JP |
406014105 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6139241 | May 1994 | JP |
6180697 | Jun 1994 | JP |
6180698 | Jun 1994 | JP |
3191429 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000132436 | May 2000 | JP |
2002183652 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003173288 | Jun 2003 | JP |
WO9924945 | May 1999 | WO |
WO9956207 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0144934 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0157720 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070180354 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |