The present invention relates to an operating system for an architectural covering. More in particular it relates to an operating system for rotatably controlling retraction and deployment of an architectural covering having at least one windable element.
In such operating systems it is often useful to have an end stop to limit the extent of maximum deployment, the full retracted position, or both. To this end EP1672164 proposes a stopper that can be attached to a portion of the length of a looped drive cord, such as a ball chain. The stopper when it engages a cover surrounding a portion of a drive pulley—with which it is operatively engaged—will block further rotation of the pulley wheel. If one stopper is used the looped drive cord should at least have a length that is at least a sufficient multiple of the pulley circumference to accord with the number of turns required to move the architectural covering between its fully retracted and fully deployed positions. The required length of looped drive cord is usually not a problem when the pulley wheel drives the architectural covering directly, but it can become problematic when the drive uses a reduction gearing. Reduction gearings, such as disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,592, have become popular for heavier roller blinds and the required number of rotations of the pulley wheel is usually 1.75 to 2.00 times the rotation of a winding means for retracting and deploying of the architectural covering. This can, in some situation, give rise to impractically long drive loops that can present a safety hazard.
Hence the present invention seeks to solve the problem of excessively long drive cord loops, especially in combination with the use of reduction gearing. It is also an object of the present invention to provide alternative structures which are less cumbersome in assembly and operation and which moreover can be made relatively inexpensively. Alternatively it is an object of the invention to at least provide the public with a useful choice.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided an operating system for rotatably controlling retraction and deployment of an architectural covering, the operating system including:
Further objectives, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent in view of the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
As shown in
To calculate the appropriate length of chain for use with a chain pulley wheel with a single enlarged pocket in combination with a roller blind, the following formula can be used:
Wherein:
Z=ratio between chain length and chain pulley wheel circumference [ ]
N=natural whole number (1, 2, 3, . . . )
Xchain=length of the chain [mm]
pc=pitch of the chain [mm]
lf=length of the fabric [mm]
tf=thickness of the fabric [mm]
dt=outside diameter of the blind fabric winding tube [mm]
nsa=number of additional safety windings of the fabric around the tube (360°=1) [ ]
i=gear transmission ratio from chain wheel to tube [1.75, 2.00, . . . ]
pcw=number of pockets or teeth of the chain wheel [ ]
xstop=number of non-engaged pockets or teeth of the chain wheel between the two stop positions along the outlet side [ ]
The enlarged pocket 17, as shown in
Furthermore the boss 11, may be shaped to be quickly engaged and disengaged with and from a winding device of an architectural covering. This enables an installer of a window covering to determine the end positions of the operating system and the architectural covering—such as a roller blind—separately and independently of one another. Once these end positions have been determined the architectural covering and the operating system may be simply connected by the boss 11, to correctly synchronise the end positions in respect of one another.
It is thus believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description. The term comprising when used in this description or the appended claims should not be construed in an exclusive or exhaustive sense but rather in an inclusive sense. Expressions such as: “means for . . . ”. should be read as: “component configured for . . . ” or “member constructed to . . . ” and should be construed to include equivalents for the structures disclosed. The use of expressions like: “critical”, “preferred”, “especially preferred” etc., is not intended to limit the invention. Features which are not specifically or explicitly described or claimed may be additionally included in the structure according to the present invention without deviating from its scope. The invention is further not limited to any embodiment herein described and, within the purview of the skilled person, modifications are possible which should be considered within the scope of the appended claims. Equally all kinematic inversions are to be considered within the scope of the present invention.
Directional references (e.g., upper, lower, upward, downward, left, right, leftward, rightward, top, bottom, above, below, vertical, horizontal, clockwise, or anti-clockwise) are only used for identification purposes to assist in the understanding of the present invention, and should not be construed to create limitations, as to position orientation, or use of the invention. Reference to either axially, radially or tangentially if used in the above is generally in relation to rotatable or cylindrical bodies of elements described. Where in the above reference is made to longitudinal or lateral this is in reference to the length or width directions respectively of elements which have an oblong or elongate appearance in the accompanying drawings.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07004875 | Mar 2007 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/001711 | 3/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/18/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/110286 | 9/18/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2564831 | Butkus | Aug 1951 | A |
2577046 | Bennett | Dec 1951 | A |
4884618 | Steeves | Dec 1989 | A |
6164428 | Berman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6250359 | Lorio et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6685592 | Fraczek et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7353847 | Early | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20060243402 | Chang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20100101741 | Koop | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110168339 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 672 164 | Jun 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100101741 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |