1. Field of Invention
This invention relates specifically to a hydraulic rock drill designed for small mounted applications, incorporating characteristics that contribute to improved performance and easier maintenance.
2. Description of Prior Art
A percussive rock drill is a device that, in conjunction with a drill bit, uses rotation and percussive energy to drill a hole in rock for purposes of blasting, etc. Every fluid operated percussive rock drill includes certain basic features. A striking piston imparts impact energy to a drill steel and bit, and a valving mechanism directs the working fluid so as to cause reciprocating motion of the piston. A rotation mechanism causes the drill steel to rotate to give the bit a fresh rock surface to strike with each blow, and a drill steel retention mechanism allows retraction of the drill steel and bit when the hole is completed. Flushing fluid (typically air or water) travels through holes in the drill steel and bit to blow rock cuttings out of the drilled hole.
In a typical operation of a hydraulic rock drill, the striking piston is caused to reciprocate by variable hydraulic forces. The drill steel is constrained and located by a chuck mechanism and a steel retainer, and is caused to rotate by a mechanism such as a hydraulic motor driving through a gear reduction. A drill bit is attached to the end of the drill steel, and the combination of impact and rotation causes the drill bit to penetrate the rock. Finally, some type of fluid energy storage mechanism is used to provide relatively constant pressure sources of working fluid for the piston and rotation.
Manufacturers of small drilling rigs, designed to drill holes in the range of 1¼ to 2 inch diameter, typically use hand-held drills that are modified for mounted use. Modifications may be as simple as removing handles and locking control valves in the “on” position. The advantage of using hand-held tools in these applications is the simplicity of fluid connections; one supply and one exhaust hose serve both impact and rotation, as opposed to larger drills in which separate hoses are required for each function. One disadvantage of using hand-held tools is that rotation torque is typically low. Since the rotation robs power from the impact, rotation power is deliberately limited in order to maximize impact power. Another disadvantage is that if the rotation stalls, the impact power continues unabated or even increases, which can cause jamming of the drill bit into the drilled hole.
An object of the present invention is to preserve the simplified hose connection of a hand-held tool while providing adequate rotation torque for mounted applications. A second object is to provide a means for automatically reducing or stopping the impact if the rotation stalls. A third object is to provide a means for automatically adjusting the available rotation torque in response to drilling requirements.
Conventional hand-held hydraulic drills use a parallel fluid system in which the available fluid flow is divided internally. Most of the flow goes to the impact mechanism but a small portion is diverted to a hydraulic rotation motor. Higher rotation speed requires more flow and hence reduces the available flow to the impact mechanism, whereas lower rotation speed sends more flow to the impact mechanism. In the worst case scenario, the rotation can stall and send all flow to the impact mechanism. In the absence of rotation, the bit no longer has a fresh rock surface on which to impact, and further penetration into the rock is nearly impossible. If operation continues, the usual result is a broken or stuck bit. In a hand-held operation, the operator can compensate for a weak rotation by not pushing the drill bit into the rock with as much force whenever there is a tendency to stall. In a mounted application feed force is fixed, and the only solution to repeated rotation stalling is to reduce the fixed feed force. However, inadequate feed force results in a loss of drilling efficiency.
The operating system as described will not work properly if a conventional impact device is simply connected in series with an existing rotation motor. The impact device must be specifically designed to use the operating system, as explained below.
Referring to
In
In
The maximum benefit of this operating system can be realized by operating on a fixed flow hydraulic system wherein normal operation occurs at about 80% of maximum system pressure. For example, suppose the subject hydraulic drill operates normally at 10 gpm (gallons per minute) at 1750 psi (pounds per square inch). Then the appropriate hydraulic system would be a fixed displacement pump delivering ten gpm with a maximum permissible system pressure of about 2200 psi. When a higher torque requirement is encountered, the inlet pressure to the rotation motor automatically increases in an attempt to maintain the same motor flow rate against greater resistance. Since the operating pressure drop across the impact mechanism is nearly constant, an increase in the motor inlet pressure (and hence the impact mechanism exhaust pressure) is answered by an increase in the impact inlet pressure. By this method a higher torque is automatically achieved while maintaining a substantially constant impact power. If the rotation pressure increases too far and the required impact inlet pressure exceeds the maximum system pressure, the impact mechanism and rotation motor will both slow down or stall, alerting the machine operator to take appropriate action. Operation is restored by reducing or removing the feed force, without the necessity of trying to free a stuck bit.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,822,752 (Roger Montabert, Jul. 5, 1974) describes a series fluid system for a hydraulic drill. However, this prior art is more complicated than the present invention and differs in significant other ways. Montabert '752 reverses the order of the current invention by passing the fluid first through the rotation motor and then through the impact mechanism. The invention is shown in two embodiments. The first embodiment uses the same amount of total flow for both rotation and impact functions, and a separate pressure regulator valve is required for proper operation. The second embodiment provides additional flow to the impact mechanism via an additional hose feeding through a pressure compensated flow control valve. In both embodiments, some of the simplicity of the series fluid system is lost because of the requirement for an external control valve. Furthermore, additional rotation torque is achieved only at the expense of rotation speed and impact power. A higher torque requirement increases the resistance to flow, and in a fixed pressure hydraulic system, the flow is automatically reduced when flow resistance increases. The rotation motor is a fixed displacement device with a direct relationship between flow and rotation speed, so lower flow causes the rotation motor to slow down. Pressure drop across the impact mechanism is directly related to flow, so the reduced flow passing through the rotation motor and impact mechanism lowers the impact mechanism inlet pressure and hence the rotation motor exhaust pressure. It is the increased pressure drop across the rotation motor that creates more torque, but the immediate and corresponding effect is a loss of impact power unless additional flow is supplied to the impact mechanism. While reduced impact power with higher torque may be advantageous in some situations, as when encountering varying rock conditions as described in the Montabert patent, it is detrimental in others. Varying rock conditions are not the only situation in which higher rotation torque is required. For example, when drilling larger diameter holes both high rotation torque and high impact power are necessary. The present invention automatically achieves a higher rotation torque when required, without sacrificing impact power.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,039,033 (Pekka M. Salmi, Aug. 2, 1977) describes another variation of a direct connection bet ween the impact mechanism and the rotation motor. In Salmi '033, a portion of the total hydraulic fluid flow is used to activate the valve mechanism tat alternately connects one shoulder of the piston to high or low pressure. After activating the valve mechanism, this portion of the flow is directed into a gas charged accumulator and thence to a rotation motor. The only similarity between Salmi '033 and the present invention is the fact that fluid passes first through the impact mechanism and subsequently to the rotation motor. There are significant differences, leading to the conclusion that Salmi '033 offers none of the advantages offered by the present invention. The operating system in Salmi '033 would most properly be considered a parallel system. i.e. part of the flow goes tote impact piston and part of the flow goes to the rotation motor (by way of the valve mechanism). Consequently, not all of the supplied flow is available to operate the impact piston. In a small hydraulic system with limited flow, this is a serious drawback. Further, an increase in rotation torque requirement causes an increase in rotation motor inlet pressure, which slows the valve mechanism to the detriment of impact power. While this may be an advantage if it is desirable to limit impact power, it is a disadvantage if it is desirable to keep impact power constant while increasing rotation torque. A further disadvantage of Salmi '033 is complication; not only is it necessary to provide a separate rotation motor exhaust connection, but a third fluid accumulator is required. Unlike Salmi '033, the present invention preserves the simplicity of having only two hydraulic connections while automatically achieving a higher rotation torque when required without sacrificing impact power.
The reader will see that the hydraulic drill operating system described herein achieves the following desired advantages
Although the description above contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing an illustration of the preferred embodiment of this invention. For example, in the preferred embodiment the valve is shown as being concentric with the piston. In an alternative embodiment the valve might be a spool valve or other valve means. Likewise in the preferred embodiment the valve and piston are connected to fluid reservoirs. In an alternative embodiment the valve and piston might be connected to nitrogen-charged accumulators. In the example of a typical hydraulic system, a specific pressure and flow mentioned. The subject operating system is not limited to any particular pressure or flow.
Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather then by the examples given.
This invention is used on the hydraulic rock drill of co-pending applications entitled “Steel Retainer for Rock Drill” and “Valve for Hydraulic Rock Drill”, both filed 2002 Jun. 25. This application is entitled to the benefit of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/300,891, filed 2001 Jun. 25.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3701386 | Feucht | Oct 1972 | A |
3822752 | Montabert | Jul 1974 | A |
4039033 | Salmi | Aug 1977 | A |
4103746 | Reynolds | Aug 1978 | A |
4126192 | Wallace | Nov 1978 | A |
4289209 | Salmi | Sep 1981 | A |
4846288 | Hunt | Jul 1989 | A |
5117921 | Bartels et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5415240 | Mundjar | May 1995 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030006053 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60300891 | Jun 2001 | US |