The present invention relates to an operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems.
To produce urea, in general, ammonia (NH3) obtained by using natural gas and the like as a raw material by an ammonia synthesis facility and carbon dioxide (CO2) separated at the time of ammonia synthesis are used to synthesize urea (CH4N2O) by a urea synthesis unit (Patent Literature 1).
Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2000-159519
Meanwhile, in a urea production plant that synthesizes ammonia and urea from natural gas and the like, if an ammonia synthesis facility is shut down, one week or more is normally necessary to resume operations of the facility.
As a result, if it happens, the urea production amount of the facility in the year decreases. If shutdown of the ammonia synthesis facility occurs many times throughout the year, a considerable decrease in the urea production amount occurs throughout the year. Therefore, there has been desired a method of increasing the urea production amount.
The present invention has been achieved to solve the above problem, and an object of the present invention is to provide an operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems that can prevent a considerable decrease in urea production even when a ammonia synthesis facility is shut down.
According to an aspect of the present invention, an operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems, at a time of producing urea by using a urea synthesis plant that includes: an ammonia synthesis facility including a reforming device having a reforming furnace that reforms natural gas to hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO) by using water vapor, a CO-shift converter that converts carbon monoxide (CO) in reformed gas to carbon dioxide, a carbon-dioxide removal device that removes obtained carbon dioxide (CO2) in the reformed gas, a synthesis gas compressor that compresses synthesis material gas containing hydrogen and nitrogen, from which carbon dioxide has been removed by the carbon-dioxide removal device, and an ammonia synthesis reactor that synthesizes ammonia from compressed synthesis material gas; a liquefied ammonia storage facility that branches ammonia obtained by the ammonia synthesis reactor from an ammonia supply line for supplying ammonia to a urea synthesis unit and stores a part of synthesized ammonia in a liquefied state; a carbon-dioxide recovery facility that recovers carbon dioxide in fuel flue gas from the reforming furnace; and a carbon-dioxide supply line for supplying the removed carbon dioxide (removed CO2) and the recovered carbon dioxide (recovered CO2) to a urea synthesis unit, comprising: providing at least two systems of the urea synthesis plants; storing a predetermined amount of obtained ammonia in a liquefied state in the liquefied ammonia storage facility; when a trouble occurs in the ammonia synthesis facility of one of the systems and production of ammonia is stopped, temporarily supplying carbon dioxide (recovered CO2) recovered by the other system to a CO2 supply line of the shut down system via an emergency CO2 supply line in order to supply the temporarily supplied CO2 to the urea synthesis unit; supplying a predetermined amount of liquefied ammonium stored in the shut down system from an ammonia supply line to the urea synthesis unit; producing urea by using the temporarily supplied CO2 and stored liquefied ammonia even in the shut down system, thereby enabling to perform a continuous operation when the ammonia synthesis facility is shut down. Advantageously, in the operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems, the carbon dioxide recovery facility recovers recovered CO2 to a maximum extent.
According to the present invention, at the time of producing urea from CO2 and ammonia, in a case where urea production plants including at least two systems are arranged in parallel, when an ammonia production facility of one of the systems is shut down, liquefied ammonia stored in the shut down system is used, and a CO2 recovery amount in a CO2 recovery facility in the ammonia synthesis facility of the other system is increased. Synthesis of urea can be continued even in the shut down system by using the increased recovered CO2 and the liquefied ammonia.
As a result, operations of the remaining one of the two systems are normally performed to synthesize urea, and urea synthesis can be continued until restart even in the urea production plant of the one system, which has been conventionally shut down, thereby enabling to avoid a considerable decrease in a production amount throughout the year.
The present invention will be explained below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The present invention is not limited the following embodiments, and configurations achieved by combining these embodiments are also included in the present invention. In addition, constituent elements in the following embodiments include those that can be easily anticipated by persons skilled in the art or that are substantially equivalent.
An operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems according to an embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to the drawings.
An example of the ammonia synthesis facility that produces a raw material for urea production is explained first with reference to
As shown in
The reforming device 14 produces hydrogen by reforming the natural gas 11, and includes a primary reformer 14A and a secondary reformer 14B. In primary reforming, the water vapor 12 is added to the natural gas 11, to reform the most part of methane. Air is added thereto by an amount of nitrogen corresponding to the generated hydrogen amount to perform secondary reforming.
The CO-shift converter 16 first converts CO to CO2 in order to remove carbon, thereby obtaining the reformed gas 15.
The carbon-dioxide removal device 17 removes carbon dioxide (CO2), which is then regenerated as CO2 having a high purity for a raw material of urea.
In the synthesis material gas 18 in which CO2 has been removed, a hydrogen to nitrogen ratio is 3:1, and the pressure of the synthesis material gas 18 is raised to a high pressure required for synthesis by the synthesis gas compressor 19.
The ammonia synthesis reactor 20 synthesizes ammonia (NH3) from hydrogen and nitrogen.
Fuel F is supplied to the reforming furnace 13 in the primary reformer 14A of the reforming device 14, so that combustion flue gas 22 generated thereby is discharged to outside. CO2 contained in the combustion flue gas 22 is recovered by a CO2 recovery facility 23 as described below.
The urea production plant of one system (an A system) in
A urea production plant of the other system (a B system) in
A CO2 recovery facility 23 that recovers CO2 in the combustion flue gas 22 discharged from the primary reformer 14A in the ammonia synthesis facility 10B is installed in the urea production plant of the B system (a lower stage).
In
Further, liquefied NH3 storage facilities 21A and 21B that can store a predetermined amount of ammonia obtained from the respective systems (the A system and the B system) in a liquefied state are installed.
In such facilities, at the time of a normal operation, ammonia is synthesized by the ammonia synthesis facilities 10A and 10B of the A system and the B system, and urea is synthesized from ammonia and CO2, respectively, by the urea synthesis units 30A1, 30A2, 30B1, and 30B2, by using removed CO2 removed from the ammonia synthesis facilities 10A and 10B.
In the B system, because recovered CO2 recovered by the CO2 recovery facility 23 can be supplied for urea synthesis, a total amount of urea synthesis in the urea synthesis unit of the B system can be increased than that of the urea synthesis unit of the A system.
In the urea production facility, such a plurality of systems are operated in parallel, so that urea is produced continuously throughout the year to ensure a predetermined annual production amount.
Meanwhile, in the ammonia synthesis facility, when a failure (such as trip of ancillary facilities) occurs in the facility or power supply is stopped, one week or more is normally necessary to resume operations. This is because the ammonia synthesis facility is formed by a combination of devices in a plurality of processes and the reforming furnace 13 is operated in a high temperature condition, therefore, if the ammonia synthesis facility is shut down once, a certain period of time (at least one week) is required for raising the temperature and pressure and for stabilization.
Therefore, in the present invention, even in the period until restart (at least one week), urea can be produced stably.
As shown in
Liquefied ammonium stored in the liquefied NH3 storage facility 21A in the ammonia synthesis facility 10A of the shut down system (the A system) is supplied from the ammonia supply line L1 by switching the NH3 supply valve V3A to the urea synthesis unit 30A1 side.
As a result, even in the shut down system (the A system), urea can be produced in the urea synthesis unit 30A1 by using the temporarily supplied CO2 and the stored liquefied ammonia.
Accordingly, in the ammonia synthesis facility 10A of the A system, even if supply of removed CO2 is stopped due to shutdown of the ammonia synthesis facility, recovered CO2 is supplied from the B system via the emergency CO2 supply line (the thick line in
As an amount to be stored in the liquefied NH3 storage facility 21A, an amount for at least one week, which is required for resuming operations in the shut down ammonia synthesis facility 10A, needs only to be stored in a liquefied state.
Further, it is desired that the CO2 recovery facility 23 in the B system has a size more sufficient than a CO2 recovery amount of a general CO2 recovery facility (four to five times the size of a general size).
Furthermore, the recovered CO2 can be supplied to the A system side by recovering CO2 to a maximum extent (recovery efficiency: 90%) at the time of shutdown of one plant.
As a result, a decrease in the urea production amount throughout the year can be prevented, and a problem of considerable decrease in the urea production amount occurring throughout the year can be resolved, thereby enabling to stabilize urea production.
This is advantageous because urea is an important material as a fertilizer; stable production thereof throughout the year is desired.
Furthermore, as shown in
In
As shown in
Consequently, in this plant, urea production of up to 7,500 T/D is possible.
A continuous urea production amount when the ammonia synthesis facility of the A system is shut down is shown in
Even if the A system is shut down, the B system can continue normal production, thereby enabling to produce urea in an amount of 3,970 T/D.
Further, recovered CO2 is supplied to the A system along with the supply of liquefied ammonium, thereby enabling to produce urea in an amount of 1,114 T/D.
As a result, conventionally, when the A system is shut down, the urea production amount is only 3,970 T/D by the B system. However, because urea in an amount of 1,114 T/D can be produced continuously in the A system, a total amount of production becomes 5,084 T/D, and thus a considerable increase in the production amount can be achieved with respect to a case where the A system is shut down (3,970 T/D).
In this manner, according to the present embodiment, when urea is produced from CO2 and ammonia, in a case where at least two systems of the urea production plants are arranged in parallel, when the ammonia synthesis facility 10A of one of the systems is shut down, liquefied ammonia stored in the shut down system is used, the CO2 recovery amount in the CO2 recovery facility 23 in the ammonia synthesis facility 10B of the other system is increased, and the increased recovered CO2 and the liquefied ammonia can be used to continue urea synthesis in the urea synthesis unit 30A1 even in the shut down system.
As a result, the remaining one of the two systems is normally operated to perform urea synthesis, and urea synthesis can be also continued until restart even in the urea production plant of the one system, which has been conventionally shut down, thereby enabling to avoid a considerable decrease in the production amount throughout the year.
At the time of resuming operations of one of the systems after being shut down, because the primary reformer 14A in the ammonia synthesis facility of the A system first starts to operate, even if a device on a downstream side thereof has not yet been operated, CO2 can be recovered from the combustion flue gas 22 of the reforming device 14.
An operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems according to a second embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to the drawings.
In the first embodiment, the CO2 recovery facility 23 is provided only in the B system; however, in the present embodiment, a CO2 recovery facility 23A is provided in the A system, and a CO2 recovery facility 23B is provided in the B system.
According to the present embodiment, in both the A system and the B system, when the ammonia synthesis facility 10A or 10B is shut down, the both systems can complement each other.
In
On the other hand, in an opposite case where the B system is shut down, recovered CO2 can be temporarily supplied to the removed CO2 supply line L3 of the B system from the A system via the emergency CO2 supply line L5 for supplying recovered CO2 (the dotted line L5 in
As a result, the both systems can complement each other.
An operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems according to a third embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to the drawings.
In the first embodiment, the CO2 recovery facility 23 is provided only in the B system; however, in the present embodiment, three systems (A to C systems) are arranged, and a CO2 recovery facility 23 that recovers CO2 in the combustion flue gas 22 from the B system and the C system is provided.
In the present embodiment, because recovered CO2 recovered by the CO2 recovery facility 23 is supplied to each of the urea synthesis units 30A1, 30A2, 30B1, 30B2, 30C1, and 30C2, even if any of the ammonia synthesis facilities 10A to 10C is shut down in the A to C systems, these systems can complement each other.
An operation method of a urea production plant including multiple systems according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention is explained with reference to the drawings.
In the first embodiment, a case where the ammonia synthesis facility is shut down in multiple systems has been explained. However, in the present embodiment, even when the ammonia synthesis facility in one system is shut down, urea production can be performed.
As shown in
As a result, even when the ammonia synthesis facility 10 is shut down, the stored CO2 from the liquefied CO2 storage facility 31 can be used to continue urea production in the urea synthesis units 301 and 302.
Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the recovered CO2 liquefied and stored is used. However, CO2 in combustion flue gas discharged from an external plant other than the ammonia production facility can be recovered separately by a CO2 recovery device, and the recovered CO2 can be supplied from outside to the urea synthesis unit.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2011/079098 | 12/15/2011 | WO | 00 | 4/16/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/088564 | 6/20/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4320103 | Pagani | Mar 1982 | A |
6342632 | Pagani et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6632846 | Sheppard et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20060270872 | Kojima | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101659633 | Mar 2010 | CN |
51-118725 | Oct 1976 | JP |
10-503526 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2000-159519 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2006-335653 | Dec 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Feb. 7, 2012, issued in corresponding application No. PCT/JP2011/079098. |
A Final Brochure, “The 2nd Annual GPCA Ferilizer Convention”, Growth in Volatile Markets, Sep. 19-21, 2011, Organised by GPCA. |
Iijima, Masaki, “Keeping your Urea Plant Operational when the Ammonia Plant is Down”, 2nd Annual GPCA Fertilizer Convention, Sep. 20, 2011, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. |
English Translation of Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 7, 2012, issued in corresponding Application No. PCT/JP2011/079098. (5 pages). |
Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2014, issued in Corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-549033; w/English Translation. (5 pages). |
Notice of Acceptance dated Jan. 23, 2015, issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2011383480. (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140275626 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |