Operational method for an electrographic printer or copier

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6253040
  • Patent Number
    6,253,040
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 8, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 26, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for an electrographic printer or copier provides a first layer of toner particles is deposited on a first toner receiving surface by a force field. The amount of toner actually applied is detected at at least one point in the first layer. The force field is modified according to changes in the actual amount of toner from the predetermined amount of toner.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention is directed to a method for the operation of an electrographic printer or copier, whereby a layer containing toner particles, referred to in brief as toner layer, is deposited on a toner acceptance surface under the influence of a force field. At least a part of the deposited toner particles is transferred onto a second toner acceptance surface under the influence of a second force field, the transferred toner particles forming a second layer thereon.




2. Description of the Related Art




Such a method is implemented in the developer unit that is set forth in European Patent EP 0 494 454 B1. Given this developer unit, the toner particles are electrically charged in a toner reservoir wherein a toner-air mixture is located and are subsequently deposited on the first toner acceptance surface that is grounded or provided with a potential, being deposited thereon as toner layer under the influence of an electrical force field. Due to the rotation of a developer drum whose generated surface forms the toner acceptance surface, the deposited toner particles are conducted past a development gap between the developer drum and a toner image carrier.




The second toner acceptance surface is formed by the generated surface of the developer drum. At the transfer gap, the toner particles are transferred from the transfer drum onto the developer drum, where they form the second layer. Due to the rotation of the drum, the toner particles of the second layer are conducted past a developing gap between the developer drum and a toner image carrier. The toner image carrier carries a latent charge image onto which toner particles are selectively applied at the development gap, whereby a toner image arises. The toner image is then applied onto an ultimate image carrier, for example onto paper, from the toner image carrier with or without employment of an intermediate image carrier.




What is disadvantageous about the known method is that a monitoring of the developing process and, in particle, of the amount of toner output by the developer unit is not possible. When the toner amount per surface on one of the toner acceptance surfaces or the charge of the toner particles during developing as well lies below or above a predetermined rated value or, respectively, rated range, then the error is not recognized until the finished print image. A reaction thus ensues relatively late. The disturbances in the print image are particularly noticeable given picture elements in the print image that are printed large-area.




In the known method, it is also not possible to exactly set the toner mass per surface section on the toner acceptance surface or the toner charge per surface section, to keep it constant during printing mode and to potentially adapt it to specific print jobs.




Both dry toner as well as liquid toner are employed as toner. Given liquid toners, for example, mechanical devices with electrical auxiliary potential are employed for applying the toner. The toners that are employed can still be divided into a single-component and multi-component toner.




What are understood by electrographic printer are, in particular, electrophotographic printers, ionographic printers and magnetographic printers. It is also known to employ bands on which the toner layer is deposited instead of the developer drum or, respectively, the transfer drum.




The Abstract of Japanese Patent Application JP-A-06067527 explains a developer unit wherein the actual toner mass per surface section of the developer drum is regulated dependent on the sensor signal of a sensor with the assistance of a force field between a transfer drum and a developer drum.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,339,140 explains a developer unit wherein the charge of a toner particle layer on the developer drum is acquired with the assistance of a sensor unit. Dependent on the output signal of the sensor unit, a charging device that is arranged along the toner path is controlled such in a control circuit that the actual toner charge reaches a rated toner charge.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,243 explains a developer unit wherein the developing rate is acquired with the assistance of a sensor that acquires the toner mass per surface unit. The charging potential, the illumination, the bias potential or, respectively, the toner concentration is modified dependent on the acquired developing rate.




The Abstract of Japanese Patent Application JP-A-58121050 explains a developer unit with a developer drum. The charge of the toner particles on the developer drum are [sic] acquired with the assistance of a sensor. A charge unit is driven such in a control circuit dependent on the output signal of the sensor that the toner on the developer drum has a predetermined charge or, respectively, a predetermined surface potential.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An object of the invention is to specify a simple method for operating an electrographic printer or copier that enables developing with high quality.




The invention is based on the perception that characteristic quantities that critically define the quality of the developing process and, thus, critically define the quality of the print image as well must already be acquired during developing and not after the developing process has been terminated, in order to be able to react quickly given deviations of these characteristic quantities from rated values.




In the invention, the average actual toner mass per surface section is therefore acquired at at least one location of the first toner layer and/or second toner layer. What per surface section thereby means is that a relatively uniform layer is assumed and the toner mass that is acquired is referred to a defined surface section of the toner layer of, for example, 1 cm


2


. The total area of the respective toner layer is employed as reference quantity. The average toner mass per surface section is also a criterion for the thickness of the layer.




In the invention, at least one of the force fields is modified in a first control circuit dependent on the deviation of the actual toner mass per surface section from a predetermined, average rated toner mass per surface section. When the actual toner mass is higher than the rated toner mass, then the force field is modified such that fewer toner particles are deposited on the toner acceptance surface. When the actual toner mass is smaller than the rated toner mass, then the force field is modified such that more toner particles are deposited on the toner acceptance surface. When actual toner mass per surface section and rated toner mass per surface section coincide, then the force field is not modified. As a result of these measures, the actual toner mass can be exactly set to the value of the rated toner mass and can be kept constant during printing operations. As required, the rated toner mass per surface section can also be modified during printing operations.




Which of the two force fields is modified is dependent on the specific parameters during printing. When, for example, the toner acceptance surfaces are made of an electrically conductive material and when the force fields are generated on the basis of difference in potential in which both toner acceptance surfaces participate or at least one of the toner acceptance surfaces participates, then the potential of the second toner acceptance surface cannot be arbitrarily selected when this toner acceptance surface is arranged on the developer drum. A change of the potential of the second toner acceptance surface would also influence the voltage in the development gap. However, it is not always possible or, respectively, expedient to modify this voltage. In this case, only the potential of the first toner acceptance surface, i.e. of the transfer drum, is modified during regulation.




Further, the average actual toner charge per surface section is acquired in the invention at at least one location of the first toner layer and/or second toner layer. The charge of the toner particles of the appertaining layer is then modified in a second control circuit dependent on the deviation between the actual toner charge per surface section and a predetermined rated toner charge per surface section. As a result of these measures, the toner charge per surface section is acquired as an important characteristic quantity of the developing process and is set to the value of the predetermined actual toner charge. During printing operation, the actual toner charge is kept constant at the value predetermined by the rated toner charge. The result is an improvement of the print images arising during developing.




The toner charge per surface section can be increased on both toner layers in order to in turn compensate charge losses during the transport of the toner particles on these layers. When the installation space in the developer unit is limited, then only the toner charge of the first toner layer or the toner charge of the second toner layer is modified by a single charging device.




For example, the control methods are combined in the fashion of a cascade control or of a relationship control. A control is also applied wherein the toner mass per surface section and the toner charge per surface section are placed in relationship, so that what is referred to as the mass-related toner charge is calculated as controlled quantity. According to a predetermined control strategy, the toner mass per surface section and/or the toner charge per surface section is modified given a deviation of the mass-related toner charge from a predetermined value. The mass-related toner charge is one of the most critical characteristic quantities of the developing process. When the mass-related toner charge is kept constant during the entire development process, then the same quantity of toner particles, whose charge lies in a predetermined range, is always available for developing. During the entire developing process, the toner particles thus deposit uniformly at the locations of the toner image carrier to be developed. The result is a high-quality print image.




When the predetermined rated toner charge per surface section is selected such that it is higher in amount than the toner charge per surface section immediately after the application of the toner particles onto the toner acceptance surface, then charge losses of the toner particle charges during transport on the toner acceptance surface can be compensated in that the toner charge is increased in any case in addition to the control of the toner charge.




In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the voltage in a developing gap is taken into consideration given the prescription of the rated toner mass per surface section and/or of the rated toner charge per surface section. When an operator varies the voltage in the developing gap, for example when setting the contrast of the print image, then rated toner mass and rated toner charge are also to be automatically adapted in order to generate a high-quality print image.




A further aspect of the invention is directed to a developer unit for an electrographic printer or copier that, in particular, is utilized for the implementation of the above-explained methods. The technical effects cited above are thus also valid for the developer unit of the invention and the exemplary embodiments thereof.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained below with reference to the drawings. Shown therein are:





FIG. 1

a schematic illustration of a developer unit with a developer drum and a transfer drum;





FIG. 2

a developer unit with a control means for controlling the mass-related toner charge on the developer drum with the assistance of a scorotron;





FIG. 3

a developer unit with a control means for controlling the mass-related toner charge on the transfer drum with the assistance of a corotron; and





FIG. 4

a developer unit with a control means for controlling the mass-related toner charge taking the potentials on the developer drum and the transfer drum into consideration.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

schematically shows the structure of a developer unit


10


at which a photoconductor band


12


is conducted past in the direction of an arrow


14


. A latent charge image in which the charges are distributed according to the image information of the image to be printed is located on the photoconductor band


12


in the surface region facing toward the developer unit


10


. The conveyor means for the photoconductor band


12


was not entered in

FIG. 1

for the sake of simplicity in the illustration.




The developer unit


10


contains a container


16


in which a toner-air mixture


18


is located. Toner particles and air are mixed in roughly the ratio 1:10 in the mixture


18


, as a result whereof the mixture


18


behaves like a liquid. A boundary surface


20


between the mixture


18


and the air contained in the developer unit


10


is relatively smooth. An ultrasound sensor


22


above the surface


20


acquires a filling level H of the mixture


18


.




The mixture


18


is thereby generated from solid toner particles having an average size of approximately 10 μm that are supplied to the toner-air mixture


18


in defined amounts by a toner metering means


24


. A toner particle supply


26


is located between inclined sidewalls


28


of the toner metering means


24


, so that the toner particles are supplied funnel-like to a metering wheel


30


. The metering wheel


30


has recesses along its circumference into which respectively identical quantities of toner particles are accepted. As a result of a rotational movement of the metering wheel


30


, toner particles from the inside of the toner metering means


24


are supplied to the toner-air mixture


18


as soon as the ultrasound sensor


22


registers a drop of the boundary surface


20


below a predetermined rated height.




An air-permeable plate


32


composed of a porous polyethylene material is arranged in the floor region of the developer unit


10


, air flowing into the toner-air mixture


18


large-area through said plate


32


from a chamber


34


lying below the plate


32


.




Two corona wires


38


and


40


are located in the developer unit


10


, these having a voltage of approximately −8 kV and negatively charging the toner particles of the mixture


18


in their proximity. The corona wires


38


and


40


transversely through the entire developer unit over a length that approximately corresponds to the expanse of the photoconductor band


12


transversely relative to the conveying direction


14


thereof. A transfer drum


42


whose axis


44


proceeds parallel to the corona wires


38


and


40


is arranged above the corona wires


38


and


40


and above the boundary surface


20


. A conductive surface layer


46


has a potential of approximately −0.9 kV, so that the negatively charged toner particles—due to the influence of the electrical field between the corona wires


38


,


40


and the transfer drum


42


—are deposited on the surface layer


46


over the entire length of the corona wires


38


and


40


. Given a rotation of the transfer drum


42


in the direction of an arrow


48


, the deposited toner particles are in the direction of an opening


50


of the developer unit


10


for the delivery of toner particles. For the section shown in

FIG. 1

, the transport path of the charged toner particles proceeds through the developer unit


10


along the outside radius of the transfer drum


42


from a point A up to a point B.




In point B, the toner particles—under the influence of a further electrical field—are transferred onto a conductive surface layer


52


of a developer drum


54


that rotates in the direction of an arrow


56


. The further electrical field lies between the surface layer


46


and the surface layer


52


charged to a potential of approximately −0.5 kV. The axis


58


of the developer drum


54


is arranged essentially parallel to the axis


44


. For the section shown in

FIG. 1

, the toner particles, following the transfer in point B, are transported by the developer drum


54


along the outside radius of the developer drum


54


to a point C in the opening


50


.




Individual toner particles that are not transferred from the transfer drum


42


to the developer drum


54


are removed from the surface layer


46


with the assistance of a stripper


60


before the respective region of the surface layer


46


is covered again with new charged toner particles. The stripper


60


proceeds over the entire length of the transfer drum


42


and is held by a stripper mount


62


.




The latent charge image of the photoconductor band


12


is developed in the region of the opening


50


in that toner particles from the surface layer


52


deposit in charged areas of the photoconductor band


12


. Toner particles remaining on the developer drum


54


are removed from the surface layer


52


by a further stripper


64


before new toner particles are again applied from the transfer drum


42


. The stripper


64


proceeds over the entire length of the developer drum


54


and is held by a further stripper mount


66


that, at the same time, is also a baffle means for the toner particles detaching from the developer drum


54


. The toner particles removed by the strippars


60


and


64


drop back into the mixture


18


.




Toner that replaces the toner particles consumed during developing is supplied to the developer unit by a toner delivery means


68


.





FIG. 2

shows the developer unit


10


, whereby, however, a latent charge image is developed on a photoconductor drum


12


′ that is arranged at the developer unit


10


instead of the photoconductor band


12


(see FIG.


1


). The photoconductor drum


12


[sic] rotates in the direction of an arrow


14


′. A control means


100


to which a rated toner charge that, for example, refers to a specific surface section of a toner layer


104


on the developer drum


54


is prescribed via a line


102


is arranged at the developer unit


10


. A rated toner mass for the surface section of the toner layer


104


is also prescribed for the control means


50


via a line


106


. Via a line


108


, the control means


50


also receives signals from an optical sensor unit


110


. The optical sensor unit


110


contains a light transmitter, a light receiver as well as an evaluation unit. The light beamed out by the light transmitter is re-emitted to the receiver by the toner layer


104


.




With reference to the re-emission behavior of the toner layer


104


dependent on the actual toner mass per surface section, the actual toner mass per surface section in the toner layer


104


is identified in the sensor unit


110


. Via the line


108


, the momentary value of the actual toner mass proceeds to the control means


100


wherein the difference between rated toner mass and actual toner mass is formed in a subtracter


112


, whereby a toner mass error signal pends at the output of the subtractor


112


. Alternatively, the sensor unit


110


can also contain a capacitative sensor with whose assistance the actual toner mass per surface section is determined in that the change of the dielectric properties of the toner layer


104


are [sic] acquired given a change of the toner mass per surface section.




A potential sensor unit


114


that has its output side connected to the control means


100


via a line


116


is also arranged close to the surface


52


of the developer drum


54


covered with the toner layer


104


. The potential sensor unit


114


contains an electrode at which a potential that is determined by the potential of the developer drum


54


and by the totality of the toner charge that is located on the surface of the developer drum


54


in the field region of the electrode is influenced. The potential sensor unit


114


also contains an evaluation unit that determines the actual toner charge from the influenced potential.




The difference between rated toner charge and actual toner charge is formed in a subtractor


118


that is contained in the control means


50


. A toner charge error signal pends at the output of the subtractor


118


.




The two error signals of the subtractors


112


and


118


are supplied to a controller


120


that, for example, contains two PI regulators, whereof one generates a setting voltage USTELL


1


dependent on the toner mass error signal on an output line


122


of the control means


100


, said setting voltage USTELL


1


being adjacent at a controlled power pack part


124


. The controlled power pack part


124


generates a voltage U


3


at its output that determines the potential on the corona wires


38


and


40


. The voltage U


3


is set dependent on the setting voltage USTELL


1


.




The voltage USTELL


1


is prescribed such by the first PI regulator that the error signal of the subtractor


112


is reduced in amount and ultimately has the numerical value of “0”. A first control circuit I thus contains the optical sensor unit


110


, the control means


100


, the power pack part


124


and the corona wires


38


and


40


. The toner mass per surface section of the toner layer


104


is regulated with the assistance of the control circuit I in that, given too low a toner mass per surface section, the potential of the corona wires


38


and


40


is increased, so that more toner particles deposit on the surface


46


of the transfer drum


42


. Since these toner particles are transferred from the transfer drum


42


onto the developer drum


54


in the region of a transfer gap, the toner mass per surface section of the toner layer


104


also ultimately increases. When the actual toner mass lies above the value that is prescribed by the rated toner mass, then the potential of the corona wires


38


and


40


is lowered. The result is that fewer toner particles deposit on the surface


46


of the transfer drum


42


. Correspondingly fewer toner particles are then transferred onto the developer drum


54


at the transfer gap


125


. Ultimately, one succeeds in keeping the actual toner mass per surface section on the surface


52


of the developer drum


54


constant according to the predetermined rated toner mass per surface section with the assistance of the control circuit I.




Dependent on the toner charge error signal of the subtractor


118


, the second PI regulator contained in the controller


120


generates a setting voltage USTELL


2


on a line


126


and generates a setting voltage USTELL


3


on a line


128


, whereby it is essentially the setting voltage USTELL


3


that is modified during regulation. The setting voltage USTELL


2


is adjacent at a controlled power pack part


130


that, dependent on the value of the setting voltage USTELL


2


, generates a voltage U


1


that influences the charge behavior of a scorotron


132


at its output. The setting voltage USTELL


3


is adjacent at the input of a controlled power pack part


134


that, dependent on the value of the setting voltage USTELL


3


, generates a voltage U


2


at its output that is adjacent at a control grid of the scorotron


132


. The charge behavior of the scorotron


132


can be controlled better via the control grid


136


than via the voltage U


1


.




The second PI regulator therefore prescribes the setting voltage USTELL


3


essentially such that the error signal of the subtractor


118


is reduced in amount and ultimately has the numerical value of “0” until noise quantities lead to a new control procedure. A second control circuit II thus contains the potential sensor unit


114


, the control means


100


, the power pack part


130


or, respectively,


134


and the scorotron


132


. When the actual toner charge per surface section on the toner layer


104


decreases, then the voltage U


2


is set such, that the charge behavior of the scorotron


132


is boosted. When the actual toner charge per surface section of the layer


104


exceeds the predetermined rated value, then the voltage U


2


is modified such, that fewer charges are applied onto the toner layer


104


by the scorotron


132


. With the control circuit II, one succeeds in keeping the actual toner charge per surface section constant according to the predetermined rated toner charge per surface section during the developing process.




In a further exemplary embodiment, the control means


100


is given a mass-referred rated toner charge instead of the rated toner charge per surface section and instead of the rated toner mass per surface section. The mass-referred toner charge qT is calculated according to the following equation.







q





T

=


Q





T


M





T












whereby QT is the toner charge per surface section and MT is the toner mass per surface section. The prescribed, mass-referred rated toner charge is compared to a mass-referred actual toner charge that is determined from actual toner charge and actual toner mass with the above-recited equation. The mass-referred toner charge QT on the layer


104


is ultimately kept constant during the developing process on the basis of a predetermined control strategy of the control means


100


.





FIG. 3

shows the developer unit


10


with a control means


100


′ for controlling the mass-referred toner charge qT on the transfer drum


42


with the assistance of a corotron


150


. The control means


100


′ is constructed like the control means


100


(see FIG.


2


), but contains a regulator


120


′ instead of the regulator


120


, this having only the two output lines


122


and


126


. This is to be attributed thereto that the corotron, which is constructed significantly simpler that the scorotron


132


(see FIG.


2


), has no control grid, so that the voltage U


2


generated by the power pack part


134


is eliminated.




By contrast to

FIG. 2

, the optical sensor unit


110


, the potential sensor unit


114


and the corotron


150


are now arranged close to the transfer drum


42


, so that characteristic quantities of a toner layer


152


on the surface


46


of the transfer drum are acquired or, respectively, influenced.




The regulation of the toner mass per surface section in the control circuit I ensues as explained above with reference to FIG.


2


. For regulating the toner charge per surface section, the control means


100


′ only prescribes the setting voltage USTELL


2


. The setting voltage USTELL


2


is selected such that the actual toner charge per surface section of the toner layer


152


adjusts to the value prescribed by the rated toner charge per surface section.





FIG. 4

shows the developer unit


10


with a control device for the regulation of the mass-referred toner charge qT taking the electrical potentials on the developer drum


54


and the transfer drum


42


into consideration. The control ensues with a control means


100


″ that is constructed essentially like the control means


100


(see FIG.


2


). Instead of the regulator


120


, however, the control means


100


″ contains a regulator


120


″ that also takes the momentary potential of the developer drum


54


and of the transfer drum


42


into consideration when regulating. These potentials derive, for example, from the contrast value that an operator of the printer has selected.




The control of the developing process ensues essentially as explained above with reference to FIG.


2


. Additionally, the control means


100


″ is connected via a line


170


to a controlled power pack part


172


and via a line


174


to a controlled power pack


176


. A bias signal BIAS


1


is communicated on the line


170


. Dependent on the value of the bias signal BIAS


1


, a voltage U


4


is generated in the power pack part


172


, this voltage being applied to the conductive surface of the developer drum


54


. The value of the potential on the developer drum


24


[sic] that is respectively selected influences both the control circuit I as well as the control circuit II since it co-determines the value of the rated toner charge and of the rated toner mass.




A further bias signal BIAS


2


that determines what voltage U


5


is generated at the output of the power pack part


176


is communicated on the line


174


. The voltage U


5


determines the potential on the surface


46


of the transfer drum


42


. The potential on the transfer drum


42


also influences both control circuits I and II.




The difference of the voltage U


5


and U


3


determines the toner mass per surface section deposited on the transfer drum


42


and also determines the toner charge per surface section to a certain extent. The difference of the voltages U


4


and U


5


determines the toner mass per surface section transferred from the transfer drum


42


onto the developer drum


54


. The difference between the voltage U


4


and the potential on the surface of the photoconductor drum


12


′ determines the toner mass per surface section that is transferred from the developer drum


54


onto the photoconductor drum


12


′ on regions in which toner particles are deposited during developing. Due to the image-wise charge distribution on the surface of the photoconductor drum


12


′, the inking with toner particles for each picture element of the latent charge image is determined by the respective difference in potential between the voltage U


4


and the local photoconductor potential.




Although other modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.






100


,


100


′,


100


″ control means






102


line






104


tonerlayer






106


,


108


line






110


optical sensor unit






112


subtractor






114


potential sensor unit






116


line






118


subtractor






120


,


120


′,


120


″ regulator






122


output line






124


controlled power pack part






125


transfer gap






126


,


128


line






130


controlled power pack part






132


scorotron






134


controlled power pack part






136


control grid






150


corotron






152


toner layer






170


,


174


line






172


,


176


controlled power pack part




USTELL


1


setting voltage




USTELL


2


setting voltage




USTELL


3


setting voltage




I, II control circuit




qT mass-referred toner charge




QT toner charge per surface section




MT toner mass per surface section




U


1


through U


5


voltage




BIAS


1


, BIAS


2


bias signal



Claims
  • 1. A method for operation of an electrographic printer or copier, comprising the steps of:depositing a first layer containing toner particles on a first toner acceptance surface under influence of a force field, the toner particles being taken from a toner supply; transferring at least a part of the deposited toner particles under influence of a second force field, being transferred from the first toner acceptance surface onto a second toner acceptance surface on which the transferred toner particles form a second layer; sensing an actual toner mass per surface section at at least one location of the first layer and/or of the second layer; and modifying at least one of the force fields by a first control circuit dependent on deviation of the actual toner mass from a predetermined rated toner mass, sensing actual toner charge per surface section at at least one location of the first layer and/or of the second layer; and modifying charge of the toner particles of at least one of the first and second layers in a second control circuit dependent on deviation of the actual toner charge from a predetermined rated toner charge.
  • 2. A method for operation of an electrographic printer or copier according to claim 1, wherein the rated toner charge lies above the value of the toner charge of the first layer and/or of the second layer immediately after the application of the toner particles.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:changing one of rated toner mass and rated toner charge when changes occur in a voltage in at least one of: a development gap in which the toner particles of the second toner acceptance surface are transferred onto a toner image carrier; and a transfer gap in which the toner particles are transferred from the first toner acceptance surface to the second toner acceptance surface.
  • 4. A developer unit for an electrographic printer or copier, comprising:a first toner acceptance surface for acceptance of a first layer containing toner particles; a second toner acceptance surface for acceptance of a second layer containing toner particles; a first field generating means for generating a first force field with which toner particles from a reservoir are deposited onto the first toner acceptance surface; a second field generating means for generating a second force field with which at least a part of the deposited toner particles are transferred from the first toner acceptance surface to the second toner acceptance surface; at least one sensor unit for acquiring the actual toner mass per surface section of at least one of the first layer and of the second layer; and a first control means that modifies strength of at least one of the force fields dependent on the deviation of the actual toner mass per surface section of the layer from a predetermined rated toner mass, at least one charging device arranged close to at least one of the first toner acceptance surface and the second toner acceptance surface for charging the toner particles on the respective toner acceptance surface; at least one sensor unit for acquiring the actual toner charge per surface section of at least one of the first layer and of the second layer; and a second control means that modifies charge behavior of the charging device dependent on deviation of the actual toner charge from a predetermined rated toner charge.
  • 5. A developer unit according to claim 4, wherein the charging device is one of a corotron and a scorotron.
  • 6. A developer unit according to claim 4, wherein at least one of the toner acceptance surfaces is electrically conductive and has a bias potential.
  • 7. In an apparatus for printing or copying, the improvement comprising:a developer unit according to claim 4.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
196 52 843 Dec 1996 DE
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 102e Date 371c Date
PCT/DE97/02959 WO 00 5/8/2000 5/8/2000
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO98/27469 6/25/1998 WO A
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
5006897 Rimai et al. Apr 1991
5235385 Rushing Aug 1993
5285243 Rimai et al. Feb 1994
5339140 Zeman et al. Aug 1994
5463449 Morse et al. Oct 1995
5734955 Gruber et al. Mar 1998
5742885 Wayman Apr 1998
5781827 Shimada et al. Jul 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
29 30 785 C2 Feb 1980 DE
0 494 454 B1 Jul 1992 EP
0494454 A2 Jul 1992 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Japanese Abstract, Publication No. 06067527, Publication Date Mar. 11, 1994.
Japanese Abstract, Publication No. 58121050, Publication Date Jul. 19, 1983.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, 58-121050, Jul. 19, 1983.*
Patent Abstracts of Japan, 06-067527, Mar. 11, 1994.