This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/815,246, titled “Robotic Navigation Utilizing Semantic Mapping”, filed concurrently with this application, incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to operator identification and performance tracking in connection with robot-assisted warehouse storage and retrieval systems, in particular, to robot-assisted product order-fulfillment systems.
Ordering products over the Internet for home delivery is an extremely popular way of shopping. Fulfilling such orders in a timely, accurate and efficient manner is logistically challenging to say the least. Clicking the “check out” button in a virtual shopping cart creates an “order.” The order includes a listing of items that are to be shipped to a particular address. The process of “fulfillment” involves physically taking or “picking” these items from a large warehouse, packing them, and shipping them to the designated address. An important goal of the order-fulfillment process is thus to ship as many items in as short a time as possible.
The order-fulfillment process typically takes place in a large warehouse that contains many products, including those listed in the order. Among the tasks of order fulfillment is therefore that of traversing the warehouse to find and collect the various items listed in an order. In addition, the products that will ultimately be shipped first need to be received in the warehouse and stored or “placed” in storage bins in an orderly fashion throughout the warehouse so they can be readily retrieved for shipping.
In a large warehouse, the goods that are being delivered and ordered can be stored in the warehouse very far apart from each other and dispersed among a great number of other goods. With an order-fulfillment process using only human operators to place and pick the goods requires the operators to do a great deal of walking and can be inefficient and time consuming. Since the efficiency of the fulfillment process is a function of the number of items shipped per unit time, increasing time reduces efficiency.
Robot assisted order-fulfillment systems have been used to increase efficiency and productivity. However, there is still a need to further increase efficiency in such systems.
In one aspect, the invention features a system for identifying and tracking performance of operators in a warehouse. The system includes at least one robot configured to interact with the operators in the warehouse, and the robot includes a first transceiver a proximity detector and a memory. The first transceiver defines a zone surrounding the robot and the proximity detector is coupled to said first transceiver. The proximity detector is configured to detect entry, into the zone, of an operator and to detect exit of the operator from the zone. The memory contains information identifying the operators who have entered and exited said zone.
In other aspects of the invention, one or more of the following features may be included. The system may further include a second transceiver associated with each operator that carries information identifying the operators and the second transceivers may be with the operators. The second transceiver may comprise an RFID transceiver. The at least one robot may further comprise a contactless identification system, wherein the contactless identification system identifies the local operator without physically contacting said local operator. The identification system may comprise a camera, and a facial-recognition system coupled to the camera, wherein the facial-recognition system identifies the local operator. The identification system may comprise a retinal scanner and a retinal-identification system coupled to the retinal scanner, wherein the retinal-identification system may identify the local operator. The at least one robot may further include a tablet, wherein the tablet may comprise a tablet processor and a network interface. Using the network interface, the tablet may provide information to a management server; the information may comprise information indicative of local operator activity. The information indicative of local operator activity may include information regarding one or more of the amount of time for an operator to enter the zone after the robot arrives at a destination proximate the user, the amount of time the operator takes to exit the zone after the operator enters the zone, or the amount of time the operator takes to perform a defined function.
In further aspects of the invention, one or more of the following features may be included. The management server may be configured to track local-operator efficiency based at least in part on the information indicative of local operator activity. The management server may be configured to provide to the local operator an incentive that is based at least in part on the information indicative of local operator activity. The management server may be configured to maintain warehouse statistics based at least in part on the information. The tablet may provide operator identification information to the management server. The operator identification information may be used by the management server to determine if the operator is an authorized operator. The operator identification information may be used by said management server to set operator preferences for interaction with said tablet; wherein said operator preferences include language.
In another aspect of the invention, there is method for identifying and tracking performance of operators in a warehouse. The method includes causing a robot to proceed to a location and at the location, defining a zone around the robot. The method includes detecting entry of a local operator into the zone and without physical contact with said local operator, identifying the local operator.
In yet other aspects of the invention, the following features may be included. The method may include detecting exit of the local operator from the zone. The method may include receiving, from a transceiver carried by the local operator, information identifying the local operator. The step of identifying the local operator may comprise receiving, from an RFID tag carried by the local operator, information identifying the local operator. The step of identifying the local operator may comprise performing identification based on data indicative of a face of the local operator. Identifying the local operator may comprise performing identification based on data indicative of a retina of said local operator. The method may further comprise providing information indicative of local operator activity to a management server. The information indicative of local operator activity may include information regarding one or more of the amount of time for an operator to enter the zone after the robot arrives at the location, the amount of time the operator takes to exit the zone after the operator enters the zone, or the amount of time the operator takes to perform a defined function. The method further comprises tracking local-operator efficiency based at least in part on the information indicative of local operator activity and providing, to a local operator, an incentive based at least in part on the information indicative of local operator activity. The method may further comprise maintaining warehouse statistics based at least in part on said information indicative of local operator activity. The method may also comprise providing operator identification information to the management server. The operator identification information may be used to determine if the operator is an authorized operator or it may be used to set operator preferences for interaction with the operator. The operator preferences may include language.
These and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying figures, in which:
Referring to
A typical robot 18, shown in
While the description provided herein is focused on picking items from bin locations in the warehouse to fulfill an order for shipment to a customer, the system is equally applicable to the storage or placing of items received into the warehouse in bin locations throughout the warehouse for later retrieval and shipment to a customer. The invention could also be utilized with other standard tasks associated with such a warehouse system, such as, consolidation of items, counting of items, verification, and inspection.
An upper surface 36 of the base 20 features a coupling 38 that engages any one of a plurality of interchangeable armatures 40, one of which is shown in
Although a robot 18 excels at moving around the warehouse 10, with current robot technology, it is not very good at quickly and efficiently picking items from a shelf and placing them on the tote 44 due to the technical difficulties associated with robotic manipulation of objects. A more efficient way of picking items is to use a local operator 50, which is typically human, to carry out the task of physically removing an ordered item from a shelf 12 and placing it on robot 18, for example, in tote 44. The robot 18 communicates the order to the local operator 50 via the tablet 48, which the local operator 50 can read, or by transmitting the order to a handheld device used by the local operator 50.
Upon receiving an order 16 from the order server 14, the robot 18 proceeds to a first warehouse location, e.g. shown in
Upon reaching the correct location, the robot 18 parks itself in front of a shelf 12 on which the item is stored and waits for a local operator 50 to retrieve the item from the shelf 12 and place it in tote 44. If robot 18 has other items to retrieve it proceeds to those locations. The item(s) retrieved by robot 18 are then delivered to a packing station 100,
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that each robot may be fulfilling one or more orders and each order may consist of one or more items. Typically, some form of route optimization software would be included to increase efficiency, but this is beyond the scope of this invention and is therefore not described herein.
In order to simplify the description of the invention, a single robot 18 and operator 50 are described. However, as is evident from
Referring to
The local operator 50 sees the robot 18 and walks towards it. The local operator 50 then inspects the tablet 48 to determine what item should be retrieved, retrieves the item from the shelf 12, and places it on robot 18, for example, into the tote 44.
In one embodiment, the tablet 18 has a proximity sensor 62 and the local operator 50 wears a tag 64 that can be sensed by the proximity sensor 62. As the local operator 50 walks into a zone 66,
The proximity sensor 62 detects the departure from the zone 66 (step 78) and updates the record 56 to reflect the time of departure (step 80). After the local operator 50 leaves the zone 66, the robot 18 then moves on to its next destination (step 82), which could be another shelf 12 or a packing station 82 for check-out.
The data collected by the tablet 48 is eventually transmitted to warehouse management server 15,
In addition to evaluating performance, data collected by tablet 48, in particular, operator identification data, can be used by warehouse management system 15 for security purposes to determine if operator 50 is an authorized operator, is authorized to operate in a particular region of the warehouse or for a particular customer. Moreover, the identification data can be used to set preferences for operator 50, such as language used by tablet 48.
All of the other robots 18, as depicted in
The data collected by robot 18 and transmitted to warehouse management server 15 indicative of local operator activity includes information regarding one or more of the following: the amount of time for an operator to enter the zone 66 after the robot 18 arrives at a destination proximate the local operator 50, the amount of time operator 50 takes to exit zone 66 after the operator enters the zone, and the amount of time the operator 50 takes to perform a defined function, such as picking an item from shelf 12 and placing on the robot 18 or picking an item from robot 18 and placing it on shelf 12.
Warehouse management server 15 may be configured to track local operator efficiency based at least in part on the information collected indicative of local operator activity. The management 15 server may be configured to maintain warehouse statistics based at least in part on this information. Operator efficiency and other statistics collected/computed may be may be used as an incentive to increase operator performance or in other ways by management.
In other embodiments, shown in
Once the robot 18 has made its rounds through the warehouse 10 and collected all items needed to fulfill an order 16, it proceeds to a packing station 100 carrying the various items. At the packing station 100, the various items are prepared for shipment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5956465 | Takagi | Sep 1999 | A |
6778092 | Braune | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7031801 | Hodge et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031802 | Bash et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7243001 | Janert et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7607440 | Coste-Maniere | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623031 | Haberer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7652238 | Haberer | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7778732 | Adachi | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8055377 | Yair et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8315735 | Nihei | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8571915 | Wong et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8839132 | Reichert | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9043025 | Brooks | May 2015 | B2 |
9126334 | Nakamura | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9333652 | Hu | May 2016 | B2 |
9393695 | Scott | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9452531 | Kikkeri | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9463927 | Theobald | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9475200 | Schlaich | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9489730 | Doettling | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9498885 | Scott | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20020186299 | Cofer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030109780 | Coste-Maniere | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040148039 | Farchmin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050207618 | Wohler | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060049939 | Haberer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080021597 | Merte | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090015663 | Doettling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090177323 | Ziegler | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222134 | Franke | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237499 | Kressel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090271036 | Kock | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100179690 | Matthias | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198365 | Kawabata | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100296908 | Ko | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110200420 | Driskill | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264266 | Kock | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276396 | Rathod | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120022689 | Kapoor | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120041593 | Ichinose | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120146789 | De Luca | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120303160 | Ziegler | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330458 | Weiss | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130317642 | Asaria et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140067121 | Brooks | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140107833 | Segawa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140254896 | Zhou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140263227 | Daniel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277691 | Jacobus | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309782 | Sharpe | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150025549 | Kilroy | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150049911 | Doettling | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150275551 | Rink | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150338917 | Steiner | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160311115 | Hill | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170032306 | Johnson | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170049517 | Felder | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012048531 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2006076283 | Jul 2006 | WO |
20080013846 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008074008 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 1, 2016, received in international patent application No. PCT/US2016/044988, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170032306 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |