Ophthalmic and contact lens solution

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8247461
  • Patent Number
    8,247,461
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 26, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2012
    11 years ago
Abstract
An ophthalmic solution comprising a polyethoxylated glyceride in the range of 0.001 to about 10 percent by weight and a buffer agent. These solutions impart surprising comfort and wearability to contact lenses. At the same time the solutions provide good preservative capacity and do not increase protein deposit.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to novel ophthalmic solutions that contain a ethoxylated glyceride as an additive to improve the wettability and to decrease the degree of protein and polymeric preservative binding to contact lens surfaces. These compositions may also comprise other agents in contact lens and ophthalmic solutions such as buffers, tonicity agents, wetting agents, enzymes, hydrogen peroxide, demulcents, thickeners, sequestering agents (chelating agents), surface active agents and preservative agents. The ethoxylated glycerides are particularly useful in contact lens treatment solutions, contact lens wetting solutions, solutions used to store contact lenses and solutions used to clean or rinse contact lenses. It has been found that surprisingly the addition of ethoxylated glycerides improve the comfort of lenses treated with such solution and that this increased comfort is surprisingly long-lasting in its effect. The ethoxylated glycerides maybe mono-, di- or triglycerides;







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The solutions of the present invention are made by one of two methods. First the ethoxylated glyceride may be melted and added to an aqueous solution which includes the other agents to be used in the desired formulation, or the additional agents may be added prior to the addition of the melted ethoxylated glyceride. Second, the ethoxylated glyceride may be dissolved in an alcohol base and this liquid mixture, added to the aqueous base. Ethoxylated glycerides are commercially available from numerous commercial sources and include Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40), polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 60), PEG-30 Castor Oil (Incrocas 30), PEG-35 Castor Oil (Cremophor EL, Incrocas 35), or PEG-40 Castor Oil (Cremophor EL, Incrocas), Cremophor EL®, Emulphor EL®, glycerol polyethyleneglycol riciinoleate, gycerol polyethyleneglycol oxystearate, polyethoxylated hydrogenated castor oil, or polyethoxylated vegetable oil. The ethoxylated glycerides useful in the present invention may include surfactants sold as PEG-6 Caprylic/Capric Glycerides PEG-8 Caprylic/Capric Glycerides; PEG-2 Castor Oil; PEG-3 Castor Oil; PEG-4 Castor Oil; PEG-5 Castor Oil; PEG-8 Castor Oil; PEG-9 Castor Oil; PEG-10 Castor Oil; PEG-11 Castor Oil; PEG-15 Castor Oil; PEG-20 Castor Oil; PEG-25 Castor Oil; PEG-30 Castor Oil; PEG-33 Castor Oil; PEG-35 Castor Oil; PEG-36 Castor Oil; PEG-40 Castor Oil; PEG-50 Castor Oil; PEG-54 Castor Oil; PEG-55 Castor Oil; PEG-60 Castor Oil; PEG-100 Castor Oil; PEG-200 Castor Oil; PEG-18 Castor Oil Dioleate; PEG-60 Corn Glycerides; PEG-20 Evening Primrose Glycerides;


PEG-60 Evening Primrose Glycerides; PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate; PEG-30 Glyceryl Cocoate; PEG-78 Glyceryl Cocoate; PEG-80 Glyceryl Cocoate; PEG-12 Glyceryl Dioleate; PEG-15 Glyceryl Isostearate; PEG-20 Glyceryl Isostearate; PEG-30 Glyceryl Isostearate; PEG-60 Glyceryl Isostearate; PEG-12 Glyceryl Laurate; PEG-20 Glyceryl Laurate; PEG-23 Glyceryl Laurate; PEG-30 Glyceryl Laurate; PEG-10 Glyceryl Oleate; PEG-15 Glyceryl Oleate; PEG-30 Glyceryl Oleate; PEG-20 Glyceryl Ricinoleate; PEG-5 Glyceryl Sesquioleate; PEG-S Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-10 Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-25 Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-30 Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-120 Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-200 Glyceryl Stearate; PEG-28 Glyceryl Tallowate; PEG-80 Glyceryl Tallowate; PEG-200 Glyceryl Tallowate; PEG-S Glyceryl Triisostearate; PEG-5 Hydrogenated Castor Oil; PEG-7 Hydrogenated Castor Oil; PEG-16 Hydrogenated Castor Oil; PEG-20 Hydrogenated Castor Oil; PEG-25 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-30 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-35 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-40 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-45 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-50 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-54 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-55 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-60 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-80 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-100 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-200 Hydrogenate Castor Oil; PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil PCA Isosterate; PEG-5 Hydrogenated Corn Glycerides; and PEG-8 Hydrogenated Fish Glycerides; which are all available from known commercial sources


The solutions of the present invention may contain other additives including but not limited to buffers, tonicity agents, demulcents, wetting agents, preservatives, sequestering agents (chelating agents), surface active agents, and enzymes.


Other aspects of the claimed solutions include adding to the solution from 0.001 to 1 weight percent chelating agent (preferably disodium EDTA) and/or additional microbicide, (preferably 0.00001 to 0.1 or 0.00001 to 0.01) weight percent polyhexamethylene biquanide (PHMBO, N-alkyl-2-pyrrolidone, chlorhexidine, polyquatemium-1, hexetidine, bronopol, alexidine, low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide, and ophthalmologically acceptable salts thereof


Ophthalmologically acceptable chelating agents useful in the present invention include amino carboxylic acid compounds or water-soluble salts thereof, including ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, hydroxyethylethylenediaminetriacetic acid, 1,2-diaminocyclohexanetetraacetic acid, ethylene glycol bis(beta-aminoethyi ether) in N,N,N′,N′ tetraacetic acid (EGTA), aminodiacetic acid and hydroxyethylamino diacetic acid. These acids can be used in the form of their water soluble salts, particularly their alkali metal salts. Especially preferred chelating agents are the di-, tri- and tetra-sodium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), most preferably disodium EDTA (Disodium Edetate).


Other chelating agents such as citrates and polyphosphates can also be used in the present invention. The citrates which can be used in the present invention include citric acid and its mono-, di-, and tri-alkaline metal salts. The polyphosphates which can be used include pyrophosphates, triphosphates, tetraphosphates, trimetaphosphates, tetrametaphosphates, as well as more highly condensed phosphates in the form of the neutral or acidic alkali metal salts such as the sodium and potassium salts as well as the ammonium salt.


The pH of the solutions should be adjusted to be compatible with the eye and the contact lens, such as between 6.0 to 8.0, preferably between 6.8 to 7.8 or between 7.0 to 7.6. Significant deviations from neutral (pH 7.3) will cause changes in the physical parameters (i.e. diameter) in some contact lenses. Low pH (pH less than 5.5) can cause burning and stinging of the eyes, while very low or very high pH (less than 3.0 or greater than 10) can cause ocular damage.


The additional preservatives employed in the present invention are known, such as polyhexamethylene biguanide, N-alkyl-2-pyrrolidone, chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylenebiguanide, alexidine, polyquatemium-1, hexetidine, bronopol and a very low concentration of hydrogen peroxide, e.g., 30 to 200 rpm.


The solutions of the invention are compatible with both rigid gas permeable and hydrophilic contact lenses during storage, cleaning, wetting, soaking, rinsing and disinfection.


A typical aqueous solution of the present invention may contain additional ingredients which would not affect the basic and novel characteristics of the active ingredients described earlier, such as tonicity agents, surfactants and viscosity inducing agents, which may aid in either the lens cleaning or in providing lubrication to the eye. Suitable tonicity agents include sodium chloride, potassium chloride, glycerol or mixtures thereof. The tonicity of the solution is typically adjusted to approximately 240-310 milliosmoles per kilogram solution (mOsm/kg) to render the solution compatible with ocular tissue and with hydrophilic contact lenses. In one embodiment, the solution contains 0.01 to 0.5 weight percent sodium chloride.


Suitable viscosity inducing agents can include lecithin or the cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyrnethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose and methylcellulose in amounts similar to those for surfactants, above.


EXAMPLE 1

Hydrophilic contact lenses were placed flat onto glass slides and rinsed with water to remove any debris. These slides were placed in a petri dish and covered with a few drops of each of the test solutions previously prepared in either water, an aqueous isotonic sodium chloride solution, or an aqueous phosphate buffered solution made isotonic with sodium chloride and adjusted to pH 7.3. Each petri plate was covered and placed in a refrigerator overnight. The following day, the slides were removed and allowed to equilibrate to room temperature. The lenses were rinsed with water and the excess water was removed. One 5 uL drop of mineral oil stained with Oil Red O was placed onto one lens for each solution. After ten minutes, the lenses were observed for the ability of the oil drop to spread.
















Solution
Oil
Water


Additive
Matrix
Dispersibility
Dispersibility







1% polyoxyl 40
water
4
5


hydrogenated castor oil





(Cremophor RH 40)





1% polyoxyl 40
buffer
5
5


hydrogenated castor oil
water




(Cremophor RH 40)





1% polyoxyl 40
sodium
2
5


hydrogenated castor oil
choride




(Cremophor RH 40)
water




1% polyoxyl 40
buffer
3
5


hydrogenated castor oil
sodium




(Cremophor RH 40)
chloride





water




1% Polysorbate 80
sodium
4
5


(Tween 80)
choride





water




1% Poloxamine 1107
sodium
2
5


(Tetronic 1107)
choride





water




1% Poloxamer 407
sodium
2
5


(Pluronic F127)
choride





water




1% Polysorbate 80
buffer
3
5


(Tween 80)
sodium





chloride





water




1% Poloxamine 1107
buffer
1
5


(Tetronic 1107)
sodium





chloride





water




1% Poloxamer 407
buffer
1
5


(Pluronic F127)
sodium





chloride





water




Water
water
1
5





Key


1 non-spreading drop


2 poor spreading drop


3 moderate spreading drop


4 increased spreading drop


5 thin spreading film






The results demonstrates that exposure of the contact lens to the ethoxylated glyceride will generate a durable modified surface capable of allow the formation of a thin oil and aqueous film. This characteristic mimics mucin and is essential for the proper tear layer formation of over the lens. A score of 3 or better is considered acceptable. This experiment also illustrates the synergistic improvement when the ethoxylated glyceride is exposed in the presence of a buffer. The inability of the Poloxamer and Poloxamine to allow the oil film to spread across the lens demonstrates that not all surface active agents will promote the spreading of a properly formed tear film over the contact lens, surface.


EXAMPLE 2

Example of Protein Deposition Inhibition


Contact lenses were soaked and heated in test solutions to which a radio-labeled lysozyme was present in a known amount for a period of 12 hours at 37 degrees Celsius. The lenses were rinsed with distilled water in order to remove residual solution. The lenses were then assayed for protein deposition using a Beckman BioGamma 1 counter. Results were reported in ug/lens.
















Lens A
Lens B
Average



ug/lens
ug/lens
ug/lens




















Phosphate buffer control
1,043
865
954



Cremophor RH40 (1%)
15
23
19



In Phosphate Buffer









Ethoxylated Castor Oil was a 1 percent w/v solution. The matrix control was phosphate buffer and sodium chloride. The polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil solution had lower protein binding than the control.


EXAMPLE 3

Example of Protein Deposition Inhibition


Isotonic aqueous phosphate buffered solutions were prepared and adjusted to pH 7.4. Contact lenses were soaked in 25 mL of the test solutions overnight. Afterwards, lysozyme was added to the tubes and warmed to 37 degrees Celsius for 12 hours. The lenses were rinsed with distilled water in order to remove residual solution. The lenses were assayed for protein deposition by the RCA method and detected on an HP PDA Spectrophotometer. Results were reported in ug/lens.















Solution
ug lysozyme per lens


















Marketed Product Control
>18.3



(phosphate buffer, Poloxamer)




Phosphate buffer control
>26.16



Cremophor RH40 (1%)
9.78



In Phosphate Buffer









Ethoxylated Castor Oil was a 1 percent w/v solution. The matrix control was phosphate buffer and sodium chloride. The polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil solution had lower protein binding than the control.


EXAMPLE 4

An example of a preferred disinfecting formulation of the subject invention is provided below in Table 1. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the tricine, creatine, choline chloride, sodium chloride and edetate disodium into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. Following this, the polyhexamethylene biguanide is added and the solution is brought to final volume with purified water. The final product has the composition shown in the Table below.













Constituent
Weight/Volume

















Polyhexamethylene-
20% w/w solution
0.0001%


biguanide HC1
available under the




mark Cosmocil CQ,




from Avecia



Tricine
Spectrum
  1.0%


Creatine
Spectrum
 0.25%


Choline Chloride
Amersco
  0.5%


Edetate Disodium
Spectrum
 0.055%


Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated
Cremophor RH 40
  0.1%


Castor Oil
from BASF Co.



Sodium Chloride
Fisher Scientific
As required for




tonicity adjustment




300 mOsm


Hydrochloride Acid, IN
VWR
as required for pH




adjustment to 7.3


Sodium Hydroxide, 1N
Mallinckrodt
as required for pH




adjustment to 7.3


Purified Water

Balance to 100%









This solution may be used to rinse, clean, and store contact lenses on a daily basis.


EXAMPLE 5

An example of a preferred formulation for a contact lens vial storage of the subject invention is provided below in Table I. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the sodium borate, boric acid, and sodium chloride into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. The final product had the composition shown in Table I below.














Constituent

Weight/Volume







Sodium Borate
Spectrum
 1.0%


Boric Acid
Spectrum
0.25%


Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated
Ccremophor RH40
 0.1%


Castor Oil
from BASF



Sodium Chloride
Fisher Scientific
As required for




tonicity adjustment




300 mOsm


Hydrochloride Acid, 1N
VWR
as required for pH




adjustment to 7.3


Sodium Hydroxide, IN
Mallinckrodt
as required for pH




adjustment to 7.3


Purified Water

Balance to 100%









EXAMPLE 6

The following are useful disinfecting solutions within the scope of the present invention that may be used for all purpose disinfecting solutions. They are made according to generally acceptable procedures except that the ethoxylated glycerides must be first be dissolved in warm water prior to the addition of the other components.















Constituent
Supplier
% Weight/Volume
Amount







Purified Water

to 80%
40 mL


Tricine
Spectrum
  1.0%
0.500 g


Carnitine
Spectrum
  .25%
0.125 g


Betaine HCl
Spectrum
  0.1%
0.050 g


Choline Chloride
Amresco
  0.5%
0.250 g


Inositol
Spectrum
  0.1%
0.050 g


Edetate Disodium
Spectrum
 0.055%
0.0275 g


Polyoxyl 40
Cremophor RH 40
  0.1%
0.5 mL of 10%


Hyrdogenated
from BASF Co.




Castor Oil





Hydrochloride

As required for pH
As required for pH


Acid, 1N

adjustment to 7.3
adjustment to 7.3


Sodium

As required for pH
As required for pH


Hydroxide, 1N

adjustment to 7.3
adjustment to 7.3


Purified Water

To 98%
Dilute to 49 mL


Sodium Chloride
Fisher
As required for
As required for




tonicity adjustment
tonicity adjustment




300 mOsm
300 mOsm


Polyhexamethylene-
20% w/w solution
0.0001%
50 uL of 0.1%


biguanide HCl
available under the





mark Cosmocil CQ





from Avecia




Purified Water

Balance to 100%
Dilute to 50 mL









EXAMPLE 7

The following are formulations within the scope of the invention of formulations intended to be used as lens-vial solutions that are used to store lenses prior to their use. These solutions have the effect of treating the contact lens in the solution and rendering the lens more comfortable in use.















Constituent
Supplier
% Weight/Volume
Amount







Purified Water

To 80%
40 mL


Tricine
Spectrum
 1.0%
0.500 g


Carnitine
Spectrum
0.25%
0.125 g


Inositol
Spectrum
 0.1%
0.050 g


Hydrochloride Acid,

As required for pH
As required for pH


1N

adjustment to 7.3%
adjustment to 7.3%


Sodium Hydroxide,

As required for pH
As required for pH


1N

adjustment to 7.3%
adjustment to 7.3%


Polyoxyl 40
Cremophor RH 40
 0.1%
0.5 mL of 10%


Hydrogenated Castor
from BASF Co.




Oil





Purified Water

To 98%
Dilute to 49 mL


Sodium Chloride
Fisher
As required for
As required for




tonicity adjustment
tonicity adjustment




300 mOsm
300 mOsm


Purified Water

Too 100%
Dilute to 50 mL








Claims
  • 1. An ophthalmic contact lens solution comprising: 0.001 to 10 percent by weight ethoxylated glyceride; 0.001 to 2 weight percent of a physiologically acceptable buffer adjusted so the pH of solution is between 6.5 and 7.8, 0.00001 to 0.1 weight percent of a polymeric preservative and the balance water.
  • 2. The solution of claim 1 which further comprises 0.01 to 2 weight percent of a physiologically acceptable tonicity agent adjusted so the solution is isotonic between 240 and 310 mOsm/kg.
  • 3. The solution of claim 1 wherein the ethoxylated glyceride is chosen from the group of compounds consisting of Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil, PEG-30 Castor Oil, PEG-35 Castor Oil, or PEG-40 Castor Oil, glycerol polyethyleneglycol riciinoleate, gycerol polyethyleneglycol oxystearate, polyethoxylated hydrogenated castor oil, or polyethoxylated vegetable oil.
  • 4. The solution of claim 1 wherein the buffer is selected from the group consisting of organic amines, organic carboxylic acids, amphoterics, phosphates, or borates.
  • 5. An ophthalmic contact lens solution comprising: 0.001 to 10 percent by weight ethoxylated glyceride; 0.001 to 2 weight percent of a physiologically acceptable tonicity agent adjusted so the solution is isotonic between 240 and 310 mOsm/kg and 0.00001 to 0.1 weight percent of a polymeric preservative.
  • 6. An ophthalmic solution comprising; 0.001 to 10 percent by weight ethoxylated glyceride; 0.00001 to 0.1 weight percent of a polymeric preservative agent.
  • 7. A contact lens product comprising: a contact lens: a sealable container; and an ophthalmic lens solution comprising: 0.001 to 10 percent by weight ethoxylated glyceride; 0.01 to 2 weight percent of a physiologically acceptable buffer adjusted so the pH of solution is between 6.5 and 7.8, 0.00001 to 0.1 weight percent of a polymeric preservative and the balance water.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/842,162, filed May 10, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,678,836 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/706,338 filed Nov. 4, 2000 now abandoned which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/163,455 filed Nov. 4, 1999. The contents of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference.

US Referenced Citations (103)
Number Name Date Kind
1432345 Lasker Oct 1922 A
2976576 Wichterle et al. Mar 1961 A
3428576 Dickinson et al. Feb 1969 A
3429576 Yoshiaki Ikeda Feb 1969 A
3503393 Manley Mar 1970 A
3591329 Chromecek et al. Jul 1971 A
3689673 Phares, Jr. Sep 1972 A
3755561 Rankin Aug 1973 A
3873696 Randeri et al. Mar 1975 A
3876768 Blank Apr 1975 A
3888782 Boghosian et al. Jun 1975 A
3910296 Karageozian et al. Oct 1975 A
3911107 Krezanoski Oct 1975 A
3912450 Boucher Oct 1975 A
3943251 Medow et al. Mar 1976 A
4022834 Gundersen May 1977 A
4029817 Blanco et al. Jun 1977 A
4046706 Krezanoski Sep 1977 A
4136173 Pramoda et al. Jan 1979 A
4136175 Rideout et al. Jan 1979 A
4136534 Villa Jan 1979 A
4209817 McGinnis Jun 1980 A
4354952 Riedhammer et al. Oct 1982 A
4361458 Grajek et al. Nov 1982 A
4361548 Smith et al. Nov 1982 A
4361549 Kung et al. Nov 1982 A
4394381 Sherrill Jul 1983 A
4439417 Matsunaga et al. Mar 1984 A
4525346 Stark Jun 1985 A
4599360 Fukami et al. Jul 1986 A
RE32672 Huth et al. May 1988 E
4748189 Su et al. May 1988 A
4758595 Ogunbiyi et al. Jul 1988 A
4783488 Ogunbiyi et al. Nov 1988 A
4820352 Riedhammer et al. Apr 1989 A
4826879 Yamamoto et al. May 1989 A
4836986 Ogunbiyi et al. Jun 1989 A
4863900 Pollock et al. Sep 1989 A
4891423 Stockel Jan 1990 A
4894454 Paradies Jan 1990 A
4988710 Olney Jan 1991 A
4997626 Dziabo et al. Mar 1991 A
5030721 Kasai et al. Jul 1991 A
5089261 Nitecki et al. Feb 1992 A
5122354 Tsuji et al. Jun 1992 A
5174872 Scott Dec 1992 A
5175161 Yokoyama et al. Dec 1992 A
5182258 Chiou Jan 1993 A
5192535 Davis et al. Mar 1993 A
5279673 Dziabo et al. Jan 1994 A
5300296 Holly et al. Apr 1994 A
5306440 Ripley et al. Apr 1994 A
5380303 Holly et al. Jan 1995 A
5401327 Ellis et al. Mar 1995 A
5422073 Mowrey-McKee et al. Jun 1995 A
5439572 Pankow Aug 1995 A
5449658 Unhoch et al. Sep 1995 A
5494937 Asgharian et al. Feb 1996 A
5547990 Hall et al. Aug 1996 A
5591773 Gronberger et al. Jan 1997 A
5607681 Galley et al. Mar 1997 A
5624958 Isaacs et al. Apr 1997 A
5631287 Schneider May 1997 A
5660862 Park et al. Aug 1997 A
5661130 Meezan et al. Aug 1997 A
5674450 Lin et al. Oct 1997 A
5691379 Ulrich et al. Nov 1997 A
5718895 Asgharian et al. Feb 1998 A
5719110 Cook Feb 1998 A
5741817 Chowhan et al. Apr 1998 A
5770582 von Borstel et al. Jun 1998 A
5780450 Shade Jul 1998 A
5807585 Martin et al. Sep 1998 A
5811446 Thomas Sep 1998 A
5854303 Powell et al. Dec 1998 A
5869468 Freeman Feb 1999 A
5888950 Potini et al. Mar 1999 A
5891733 Inove Apr 1999 A
5925317 Rogalskyj et al. Jul 1999 A
5925371 Ishiwatari Jul 1999 A
5942218 Kirschner et al. Aug 1999 A
5945446 Laub Aug 1999 A
5952320 Davidsen et al. Sep 1999 A
5965736 Akhavan-Tafti Oct 1999 A
5968904 Julian et al. Oct 1999 A
6001805 Jaynes et al. Dec 1999 A
6008195 Selsted Dec 1999 A
6022732 Bakhit et al. Feb 2000 A
6056920 Lepre May 2000 A
6117869 Picard et al. Sep 2000 A
6121327 Tsuzuki et al. Sep 2000 A
6126706 Matsumoto et al. Oct 2000 A
6139646 Asgharian et al. Oct 2000 A
6153568 McCanna et al. Nov 2000 A
6162398 Shuler Dec 2000 A
6191110 Jaynes et al. Feb 2001 B1
6309596 Xia et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309658 Xia et al. Oct 2001 B1
6432893 Doi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6617291 Smith Sep 2003 B1
6624203 Smith Sep 2003 B1
20030190258 Smith Oct 2003 A1
20050042198 Smith et al. Feb 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
0812592 Dec 1997 EP
0923950 Dec 2000 EP
1398058 Mar 1973 GB
58040517 Jan 1983 JP
10108899 Apr 1998 JP
2000016965 Jan 2000 JP
2127100 Mar 1999 RU
2127106 Mar 1999 RU
WO9101763 Feb 1991 WO
WO 9204905 Apr 1992 WO
WO9211876 Apr 1992 WO
WO9221049 Nov 1992 WO
WO9400160 Jan 1994 WO
WO9415649 Jul 1994 WO
WO 9415649 Jul 1994 WO
WO9500176 Jan 1995 WO
WO9606603 Mar 1996 WO
WO9730834 Sep 1997 WO
WO9741215 Nov 1997 WO
WO9923887 May 1999 WO
WO9937295 Jul 1999 WO
WO0007634 Feb 2000 WO
WO0012514 Mar 2000 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100122918 A1 May 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60163455 Nov 1999 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10842162 May 2004 US
Child 12693878 US
Parent 09706338 Nov 2000 US
Child 10842162 US