Patent Grant
8557868
The present invention relates to contact lens care solutions that have improved ability to resist protein deposition and to provide lenses treated with such solutions to stabilize proteins more effectively, and to decrease the degree of other cationic depositions on said lenses, such as cationic preservative deposition of the lenses. The solutions of the present invention employ short chain quaternary amines as an additive to state of the solutions in order to decrease the denaturation of proteins during cleaning cycles and to coat treated lenses to decrease the number of active binding sites on the lenses. The sort chain quaternary amines are of the general chemical formula
where R1-5 generally is a short chain of 1 to 4 carbon atoms with hydroxyl or carboxylic acid functionality or a salt thereof. In particular R1-5 may be chosen to be carnitine, betaine, or choline or salts thereof. These cationic amines also provide increased preservative efficacy, reduce the potential for irritation by decreasing the possibility of cationic preservative binding on lenses, and furthermore act as buffering agents to provide increased pH stability for prepared solutions. Specifically R1, R2, R3 and R4 are —H or from the group of radicals below, or salts thereof, and R5 is chosen from the group of radicals below, or salts thereof:
Specifically compounds that meet the requirements of the present invention as a amine include, but are not limited to Betaine; Bicine (N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-glycline); Bis-Tris (Bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)imino-tns (hydroxymethyl) methane; Choline; Carnitine; Creatine; Creatinine; Diisopropylamine; Diethanolamine; dimethyl Aspartic Acid; Dimethyl glutamate; Methyl Aspartate; Methylethanolamine; Hydroxymethyl Glycinate; Triethylamine; Triethanolamine; Tricine(N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl glycine); and Triisopropanolamine, and the like.
Protein binds to contact lens and form tenacious deposits that must be removed by mechanical rubbing or enzymatic hydrolysis. Physiologic problems associated with antigenic response to the denatured protein. Adversely affects optical clarity. Since denatured proteins are hydrophobic, heavily deposited lenses will feel dry and uncomfortable. Therefore, systems that are able to reduce protein adsorption will result in improved quality of wear for the individual.
It is thought that contact lens have a net negative charge. Cationic protein will preferentially bind to these lenses. The low molecular weight amines will compete for the bind sites and reduce the amount of protein that is deposited. The strength of competition is based on the binding strength of the competing amine. Quaternary amines are recognized as strong binding groups whose charge is independent of pH. Progressive substitution of the quaternary group is acceptable providing the pH is controlled to ensure an cationic charge. Removing more than three of the substituents will result in a primary amine which has the potential for binding to reducing sugars such as glucose and form a colored Schiff Base reaction product. Therefore, the preferred compounds are secondary, tertiary, and quaternary low molecular weight amines with at least one hydrophilic substituent.
Methods of Use
The solution of the present invention are may be used in several modes: preferably, the solutions are used to pre-treat the lens with the low molecular weight (LMW) amines prior to insertion. These LMW amines are added to the isotonic aqueous lens vial solution. The solution may be buffered or the amines may act as their own buffer to control the pH. The solution should be isotonic (150-450 mOsm) in order to ensure the full lens matrix is properly hydrated and the sites are available for binding. The pH should be approximately neutral (4.5 to 8.5). This will ensure the lenses that rely on carboxylic acids for lens hydration are fully ionized at a pH above 4.5. The amines are cationic at a pH below 8.5 and therefore function well to prevent protein deposition at physiological pH ranges.
The solutions may also be used to repetitively treat contact lenses with the LMW amines to replenish any material that may have dissociated from the lens during wear. In this case, since the solution is generally preserved with a cationic preservative, these amines will compete with the cationic preservative for binding to the lens, and provide further advantages in reducing contact lens discomfort.
Lastly the solutions may be applied directly to lenses while on the eye to replenish any material that has dissociated from the lens during wear.
Formulations
The present invention comprises 0.0001 to 5 weight percent of short chain quaternary amines (the LMW amines described above) and a second contact lens solution agent. These agents may include but are not limited to an effective amount of a preservative component, for example, an effective preserving amount of a non-oxidative antimicrobial component. Any suitable preservative component may be employed provided that it functions as a preservative and has no significant detrimental effect on the contact lens being treated or the wearer of the treated contact lens. Examples of useful preservative components include, but are not limited to, poly[dimethylimino-2-butene-1,4-diyl] chloride, alpha [4-tris (2-hydroethyl) ammonium-dichloride (available from Onyx Corporation under the trademark Polyquarternium I Registered™), benzalkonium halides such as benzalkonium chloride, alexidine salts, chlorhexidine salts, hexamethylene biguanides and their polymers, and the like and mixtures thereof.
The amount of preservative component included varies over a relatively wide range depending, for example, on the specific preservative component being employed. Preferably, the amount of preservative component is in the range of about 0.000001% to about 0.001% or more.
The liquid media, e.g., aqueous liquid media, employed preferably include a buffer component which is present in an amount effective to maintain the pH of the liquid medium in the desired range. This buffer component may be present in the liquid medium, e.g., either separately or in combination with one or more of the other presently useful components, e.g., with the hydrogen peroxide. Among the suitable buffer components or buffering agents which may be employed are those which are conventionally used in contact lens care products. Examples of useful buffer components include those with carbonate functionalities, bicarbonate functionalities, phosphate functionalities, borate functionalities, and amine functionalities the like and mixtures thereof. The buffers may be alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts, in particular sodium and potassium.
Further, in order to avoid possible eye irritation, it is preferred that the presently useful combined liquid medium has an osmolality (a measure of tonicity) of at least about 200 mOsmollkg, preferably in the range of about 200 to about 350 or about 400 mOsmollkg. In an especially useful embodiment, the osmolality or tonicity o the combined liquid medium substantially corresponds to the tonicity of the fluids of the eye, in particularly the human eye.
Any suitable ophthalmically acceptable tonicity component or components may be employed, provided that such component or components are compatible with the other ingredients of the combined liquid medium and do not have deleterious or toxic properties which could harm the eye. Examples of useful tonicity components include sodium chloride, potassium chloride, mannitol, dextrose, glycerin, propylene glycol and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the tonicity component is selected from inorganic salts and mixtures thereof.
The amount of ophthalmically acceptable tonicity component utilized can vary widely. In one embodiment, the tonicity component is preferably present in the combined liquid medium in an amount in the range of about 0.5 to about 0.9% of the combined liquid medium.
One or more additional components can be included in one or more of the present useful liquid media. Such additional component or components are chosen to impart or provide at least one beneficial or desired property to the liquid media. Such additional components may be selected from components which are conventionally used in one or more contact lens care compositions and which do not detrimentally interact with the other components present. Examples of such additional components include cleaning agents, wetting agents, nutrient agents, sequestering agents, viscosity builders, contact lens conditioning agents, colorants, and the like. These additional components may each be included in the combined liquid medium in an amount effective to impart or provide the beneficial or desired property to the combined liquid medium. Such additional components may be included in the presently useful liquid media in amounts similar to the amounts of such components used in other, e.g., conventional, contact lens care products.
Examples of useful sequestering agents include disodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate, alkali metal hexametaphosphate, citric acid, sodium citrate and mixtures thereof.
Examples of useful viscosity builders include hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxymethyl cellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol and mixtures thereof.
In a particularly useful embodiment further includes at least one enzyme effective to remove debris or deposit material from a contact lens. Among the types of debris that form on contact lens during normal use are protein-based debris, mucin-based debris, lipid-based debris and carbohydrate-based debris. One or more types of debris may be present on a single contact lens.
The enzyme employed may be selected from peroxide-active enzymes which are conventionally employed in the enzymatic cleaning of contact lenses. For example, many of the enzymes disclosed in Huth et al U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 32,672 and Karageozian et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,296 are useful in the present invention. These patents are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein. Among the useful enzymes are those selected from proteolytic enzymes, lipases and mixtures thereof. Preferred proteolytic enzymes are those which are substantially free of sulfhydryl groups or disulfide bonds, whose presence may react with the active oxygen in the HPLM to the detriment of the activity of the enzyme. Metallo-proteases, those enzymes which contain a divalent metal ion such as calcium, magnesium or zinc bound to the protein, may also be used.
A more preferred group of proteolytic enzymes are the serine proteases, particularly those derived from Bacillus and Streptomyces bacteria and Aspergillus molds. Within this grouping, the still more preferred enzymes are the derived alkaline proteases generically called subtilisin enzymes. Reference is made to Keay, L., Moser, P. W. and Wildi, B. S., “Proteases of the Genus Bacillus”. II. Alkaline Proteases, “Biotechnology & Bioengineering”, Vol. XII, pp. 2 13-249 (1970, March) and Keay, L. and Moser, P. W., “Differentiation of Alkaline Proteases form Bacillus Species” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Comm., Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 600-604, (1969).
The subtilisin enzymes are broken down into two sub-classes, subtilisin A and subtilisin B. In the subtilisin A grouping are enzymes derived from such species are B. subtilis, B. licenifomiis and B. pumilis. Organisms in this sub-class produce little or not neutral protease or amylase. The subtilisin B. sub-class is made up of enzymes from such organisms a B. subtilis, B. subtilis var. amylosacchariticus, B. aniyloliquefaciens and B. subtilis NRRL B341 1. These organisms product neutral proteases and amylases on a level about comparable to their alkaline protease production. One or more enzymes from the subtilisin A sub-class are particularly useful.
In addition other preferred enzymes are, for example, pancreatin, trypsin, collagenase, keratinase, carboxylase, aminopeptidase, elastase, and aspergillopeptidase A and B, pronase E (from S. griseus) and dispase (from Bacillus polymyxa).
An effective amount of enzyme is to be used in the practice of this invention. Such amount will be that amount which effects removal in a reasonable time (for example overnight) of substantially all of at least one type of debris from a lens due to normal wear. This standard is stated with reference to contact lens wearers with a history of normal pattern of lens debris accretion, not the very small group who may at one time or another have a significantly increased rate of debris accretion such that cleaning is recommended every day, or every two or three days.
The amount of enzyme required to make an effective cleaner will depend on several factors, including the inherent activity of the enzyme, and the extent of its interaction with the hydrogen peroxide present.
As a basic yardstick, the working solution should contain sufficient enzyme to provide about 0.001 to about 3 Anson units of activity, preferably about 0.01 to about I Anson units, per single lens treatment. Higher or lower amounts may be used. Enzyme activity is pH dependent so for any given enzyme, there is a particular pH range that is most effective and the solution may be formulated to adjust the pH for optimal enzyme activity.
Contact lenses were soaked and heated in test solutions to which a radio-labeled lysozyme was present in a known amount for a period of 12 hours at 37 degrees Celsius. The lenses were rinsed with distilled water in order to remove residual solution. The lenses were then assayed for protein deposition using a Beckman BioGamma I counter. Results were reported in ug/lens.
Choline chloride was a 1 percent w/v solution. The matrix control was phosphate buffer and sodium chloride. The low molecular weight amine solution had lower protein binding than the control.
Contact lenses were soaked and heated in test solutions to which a radio-labeled C14-PHMB solution in a a known concentration for a period of 12 hours at 37 degrees Celsius. The lenses were rinsed with distilled water in order to remove residual solution. The lenses were then assayed for the radio-labeled protein deposition using a Beckman BioGamma 1 counter. Results were reported in ug/lens.
Each of the additives were at a 1 percent w/v solution in the phosphate buffer. The control was phosphate buffer and sodium chloride. The low molecular weight amines solution had a lower cationic preservative adsorption the control.
Contact lenses were soaked test solutions overnight. Afterwards, lysozyme was added to the tubes and warmed to 37 degrees Celsius for 12 hours. The lenses were rinsed with distilled water in order to remove residual solution. The lenses were assayed for protein deposition by the BCA method and detected on an HP PDA Spectrophotometer. Results were reported in ug/lens.
Choline chloride and Betaine HCl were a 1 percent w/v solution in the phosphate buffer. The control was phosphate buffer and sodium chloride. The low molecular weight amine solution had lower protein binding than the control.
Formulations containing low molecular weight amines were prepared in a 0.1% phosphate buffer. The solutions were made isotonic with sodium chloride and preserved with polyhexamethylene biquanide at 0.0001% and hydrogen peroxide at 0.0060%. Dequest 2060S was added as a stabilizer. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide. The in vitro microbicidal activity of the solutions was determined by exposing C. albicans to 10 ml of each solution at room temperature for 4 hours. Subsequently, an aliquot of each solution was serial diluted onto agar plates and incubated for 48 hours at elevated temperatures. At the conclusion of the incubation period the plates are examined for the development of colonies. The log reduction was determined based on a comparison to the inoculum control. The following table provides the results of the in vitro studies.
C albicans
Each of the low molecular weight amines showed an improvement in the activity against C. albicans as compared to the buffer control.
Formulations containing exemplary low molecular weight amines were prepared in a 0.2% phosphate buffer. The solutions were made isotonic with sodium chloride and preserved with polyhexamethylene biquanide at 0.0001%. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with either 1N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. The in vitro microbicidal activity of the solutions was determined by exposing C. albicans to 10 ml of each solution at room temperature for 4 hours. Subsequently, an aliquot of each solution was serial diluted onto agar plates and incubated for 48 hours at elevated temperatures. At the conclusion of the incubation period the plates are examined for the development of colonies. The log reduction was determined based on a comparison to the inoculum control. The following table provides the results of the in vitro studies.
C albicans
Each of the low molecular weight amines showed an improvement in the activity against C. albicans as compared to the buffer control.
An example of a preferred disinfecting formulation of the subject invention is provided below in Table I. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the tricine, creatine, choline chloride, sodium chloride and edetate disodium into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. Following this, the polyhexamethylene biguanide is added and the solution is brought to final volume with purified water. The final product has the composition shown in the Table below.
This solution may be used to rinse, clean, and store contact lenses on a daily basis.
An example of a preferred formulation for a contact lens vial storage of the subject invention is provided below in Table I. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the tricine, creatine, choline chloride, and sodium chloride into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. Following this, the polyhexamethylene biguanide is added and the solution is brought to final volume with purified water. The final product had the composition shown in Table I below.
An example from another patent: specific representative embodiments of biguanides for use in the contact lens disinfectant methods include free bases and water soluble salts wherein:
An example of a preferred cleaning and disinfecting formulation of the subject invention is provided. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the tricine, creatine, choline chloride, sodium chloride and edetate disodium into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. Following this, the polyhexamethylene biguanide is added and the solution is brought to final volume with purified water. The final product has the composition shown in the following table.
This solution may be used to rinse, clean, and store contact lenses on a daily basis.
An example of a preferred formulation for a contact lens vial storage of the subject invention is provided. This solution is prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of the tricine, creatine, choline chloride, and sodium chloride into a vessel containing approximately 90% of the water volume. After each of the ingredients has dissolved, the pH is adjusted to 7.3 with either 1 N sodium hydroxide or 1 N hydrochloric acid. Following this, the polyhexamethylene biguanide is added and the solution is brought to final volume with purified water. The final product had the composition shown in Table I below.
Formulation was prepared by dissolving Tricine, Carnitine, Betaine HCl, Choline Chloride, Inositol, Disodium edetate, and Cremophor RH40 in 80% of the water volume. The pH of the solution was adjust to 7.3 with 1 N sodium hydroxide. The tonicity of the solution was adjusted with sodium chloride and polyhexamethylene biguanide. The solution was diluted to volume with water.
Formulation was prepared by dissolving Tricine, Carnitine, and Inositol in 80% of the water volume. The pH of the solution was adjust to 7.3 with 1 N sodium hydroxide and Cremophor RH40 was added. The tonicity of the solution was adjusted with sodium chloride. The solution was diluted to volume with water.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/706,317, filed Nov. 4, 2000 now abandoned.
This invention was made with support from a government grant under grant number EY11572 from the National Institute of Health. The government has retained certain rights in this invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1432345 | Lasker | Oct 1922 | A |
| 2975576 | Wichterle et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3428576 | Dickinson et ai. | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3429576 | Ikeda | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3503393 | Manley | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3591329 | Chromecek et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3689673 | Phares, Jr, | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3755561 | Rankin | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3873696 | Randeri et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3876768 | Blank | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3888782 | Boghosian et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3911107 | Krezanoski | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3912450 | Boucher | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3943251 | Medow et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4022834 | Gundersen | May 1977 | A |
| 4029817 | Blanco et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4046706 | Krezanoski | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4136173 | Pramoda et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4136175 | Rideout et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4136534 | Villa | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4209817 | McGinnis | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4354952 | Reidhammer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4361458 | Grajek et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4361548 | Smith et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4361549 | Kung et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4394381 | Sherrill | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4439417 | Matsunaga et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4525346 | Stark | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4599360 | Fukami et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4748189 | Su et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4758595 | Ogunbiyi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4783488 | Ogunbiyi et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4820352 | Reidhammer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4826879 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4836986 | Ogunbiyi et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4863900 | Pollock et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4891423 | Stockel | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4894454 | Paradies | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4988710 | Olney | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4997626 | Dziabo et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5030721 | Kasai et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5078908 | Ripley et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089261 | Nitecki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5122354 | Tsuji et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5174872 | Scott | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175161 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5182258 | Chiou | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192535 | Davis et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5279673 | Dziabo et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5300296 | Holly et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306440 | Ripley et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5361287 | Williamson | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380303 | Holly et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5439572 | Pankow | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5449658 | Unhoch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5494937 | Asgharian et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5547990 | Hall et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5591773 | Grunberger et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5607681 | Galley et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5612375 | Sueoka | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5624958 | Isaacs et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5660862 | Park et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661130 | Meezan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5674450 | Lin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5691379 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5718895 | Asgharian et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719110 | Cook | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5741817 | Chowhan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5770582 | von Borstel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780450 | Shade | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5807585 | Martin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811446 | Thomas | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5854303 | Powell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5869468 | Freeman | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888950 | Potini et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891733 | Inoue | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5925317 | Rogalskyj et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5925371 | Ishiwatari | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942218 | Kirschner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945446 | Laub | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5952320 | Davidsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965736 | Akhavan-Tafti | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968904 | Julian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6001805 | Jaynes et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008195 | Selsted | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6022732 | Bakhit et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6056920 | Lepre | May 2000 | A |
| 6117869 | Picard et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121327 | Tsuzuki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126706 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139646 | Asgharian et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153568 | McCanna et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156563 | Smith et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6191110 | Jaynes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6242491 | Kaddurah-Daouk | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6309596 | Xia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309658 | Xia et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6432893 | Doi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6617291 | Smith | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624203 | Smith | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 20030190258 | Smith | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20050042198 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 812 592 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 0 923 950 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1398058 | Mar 1973 | GB |
| 58010517 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 10-108899 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2000016966 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2127100 | Mar 1999 | RU |
| WO 9101763 | Feb 1991 | WO |
| WO 9204905 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| WO 9211876 | Jul 1992 | WO |
| WO 9221049 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 9400160 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO 9500176 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO 9606603 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO 9734834 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 9741215 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9923887 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9937295 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 0007634 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 0011514 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ballweber et al., “In Vitro Microbicical Activities of Cecropin Peptides D2A21 and D4E1 and Gel Formulations Containing 0.1 to 2% D2A21 against Chlamydia trachomatis”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy, Jan. 2002, pp. 34-41, vol. 46, No. 1. |
| Creighton, Thomas E., “Proteins Structures and Molecular Properties”, W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1984, pp. 179-182. |
| De Lucca et al., “Fungicidal Properties, sterol binding, and proteolytic resistance of the synthetic peptide D4E1”, Canadian Journmal of Microbiology, Jun. 1998, pp. 514-520, vol. 44, No. 6. |
| Keay, L., Moser, P.W. and Wildo, B.S., “Proteases of the Genus Bacillus. II. Alkaline Proteases”, Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Mar. 1970, pp. 213-249, vol. XII. |
| Keay, L. and Moser, P.W., “Differentiation of Alkaline Proteases form Bacillus Species”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Comm, 1969, pp. 600-604, vol. 34, No. 5. |
| Schutte, L., et al., “The Substitution Reaction of Histidine and Some Other Imidazol Derivatives With Iodine”, Tetrahedon, Supp. No. 7, 1965, pp. 295-306. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030190258 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09706317 | Nov 2000 | US |
| Child | 10294509 | US |
