1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an opposed impeller arrangement; and more particularly relates to a pump having such an opposed impeller arrangement.
2. Brief Description of Related Art
By way of example,
In the prior art, and consistent with that shown in
Some of the shortcomings of the above mentioned devices include the following: Having 2 identical impellers helps to reduce the axial forces generated but typically there is still an imbalance due to the higher pressure located at the inlet of the second stage. When the impellers have a different size inlet, this allows for an even greater imbalance in axial forces, but can also lead to a difference in design of the second stage wear ring, additional components, and complexity. If the same wear ring is not used, a second wear ring will need to be used which now increases the axial imbalance and may make the machining of the pump casing more complex.
There is a need in the industry for a better way to configure these known impellers presently used in multi-stage opposed impeller pumps.
According to some embodiments, and by way of example, the present invention may include, or take the form of, an opposing impeller arrangement, e.g., for using in an opposed impeller pump, featuring a combination of a stage 1 impeller arrangement and a stage 2 impeller arrangement having opposing impellers and different impeller and wear ring arrangements.
The stage 1 impeller arrangement may include a stage 1 impeller and a stage 1 wear ring, and be configured to receive an input fluid flow and a pump stage 1 fluid flow.
In contrast, the stage 2 impeller arrangement may include a stage 2 impeller and a stage 2 wear ring configured to receive the pump stage 1 fluid flow and provide a pump stage 2 fluid flow, and may also include a stage 2 wear ring undercut configured between the stage 2 impeller and the stage 2 wear ring to offset generated axial thrust, e.g., in an opposing impeller pump, based upon the different impeller and wear ring arrangements.
According to some embodiments, the present invention may also include one or more of the following features:
The stage 2 wear ring may include a stage 2 outer circumferential wear ring surface arranged between opposing stage 2 planar wear ring surfaces, one opposing stage 2 planar wear ring surface facing towards the stage 2 impeller; and the stage 2 impeller may be configured with a stage 2 curved impeller surface that slopes towards and meets the stage 2 wear ring on the one opposing stage 2 planar wear ring surface facing the stage 2 impeller so as to form the stage 2 wear ring undercut.
The outer circumferential wear ring surface may have an outer diameter; and the stage 2 wear ring undercut may have a corresponding outer diameter that is less than the outer diameter of the outer circumferential wear ring surface.
By way of further example, the present invention may take the form of an opposed impeller pump featuring an opposing impeller arrangement, e.g., consistent with that set forth herein. The opposed impeller pump may include, or take the form of, a multistage pump.
The drawing, which is not necessarily drawn to scale, includes the following Figures:
The following is a list of Figure labels used in the drawing:
Some pressures are labeled:
P1: Suction Pressure into Stage 1 inlet;
P2: Stage 1 Discharge Pressure and
P3: Stage 2 Discharge Pressure (Also total pump pressure).
Some parts/diameters are labeled:
Similar parts in Figures are labeled with similar reference numerals and labels for consistency.
Every lead line and associated reference label for every element is not included in every Figure of the drawing to reduce clutter in the drawing as a whole.
As one skilled in the art would appreciate, the total axial thrust produced by a two stage opposed impeller pump is generated because of a difference of the pressures exposed in the areas between the first and second stage impellers and the increase in head as you go from one stage to the next. By keeping the same wear ring diameter and introducing an undercut to the second stage, a step is created that will help to balance some of the pressures generated from the second stage, e.g., consistent with that shown in
The Stage 2 impeller (aka “impeller stage 2”) also has a higher pressure and flow delivered since it receives pressure and flow from Stage 1, therefore this second stage generates a pressure rise approximately equal to that of the first stage. In the conventional 2 stage design, e.g., like that shown in
In the present invention, the wear ring undercut shown in
By way of example, the present invention may be implemented an opposed impeller arrangement, e.g., for using in an opposed impeller pump, featuring a combination of a stage 1 impeller arrangement and a stage 2 impeller arrangement having opposing impellers and different impeller and wear ring arrangements, e.g., like that shown in
The stage 1 impeller arrangement may include the stage 1 impeller and the stage 1 wear ring, and be configured to receive an input fluid flow and a pump stage 1 fluid flow, e.g., like that shown in
The stage 2 impeller arrangement may include the stage 2 impeller and the stage 2 wear ring configured to receive the pump stage 1 fluid flow and provide a pump stage 2 fluid flow, and may also include the stage 2 wear ring undercut configured between the stage 2 impeller and the stage 2 wear ring to offset generated axial thrust in the opposing impeller pump, based upon the different impeller and wear ring arrangements, e.g., like that shown in
Consistent with that best shown in the exploded view in
The stage 2 outer circumferential wear ring surface S1 may have an outer diameter; and the stage 2 wear ring undercut may have a corresponding outer diameter that is less than the outer diameter of the outer circumferential wear ring surface S1, e.g., so as to form an undercut as shown.
In contrast to the stage 2 impeller arrangement, and consistent with that shown in
By way of example,
The Interchangeable Terminology
It is noted for the sake of completeness that the terms “stage 1 wear ring” and “wear ring stage 1”, the terms “stage 2 wear ring” and “wear ring stage 2”, the terms “stage 1 impeller” and “impeller stage 1”, and the terms “stage 2 impeller” and “impeller stage 2”, may be and/or are all used interchangeably herein. Similar, the term “stage 2 wear ring undercut” and “wear ring undercut” also may be and/or are also used interchangeably herein.
Applications
By way of example, possible applications of the present invention may include its use in relation to one or more of the following:
Pumps,
Fans,
Blowers and
Compressors.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a branch of fluid mechanics that uses numerical analysis and algorithms to solve and analyze problems that involve fluid flows. Computers are used to perform the calculations required to simulate the interaction of liquids and gases with surfaces defined by boundary conditions.
Further still, the embodiments shown and described in detail herein are provided by way of example only; and the scope of the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular configurations, dimensionalities, and/or design details of these parts or elements included herein. In other words, a person skilled in the art would appreciate that design changes to these embodiments may be made and such that the resulting embodiments would be different than the embodiments disclosed herein, but would still be within the overall spirit of the present invention.
It should be understood that, unless stated otherwise herein, any of the features, characteristics, alternatives or modifications described regarding a particular embodiment herein may also be applied, used, or incorporated with any other embodiment described herein.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with respect to exemplary embodiments thereof, the foregoing and various other additions and omissions may be made therein and thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application claims benefit to provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/263,982, filed 7 Dec. 2015, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2440947 | Hart | May 1948 | A |
3105632 | Tanzberger | Oct 1963 | A |
3225692 | Oakes | Dec 1965 | A |
3589827 | Gerasimenko | Jun 1971 | A |
3918831 | Grennan | Nov 1975 | A |
4037985 | Karassik et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4063846 | Eagle | Dec 1977 | A |
4208166 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4421456 | Huffman | Dec 1983 | A |
4439982 | Weiler et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4527948 | Addie | Jul 1985 | A |
4793777 | Hauenstein | Dec 1988 | A |
5248245 | Behnke et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5873697 | Gully | Feb 1999 | A |
5915921 | Sabini | Jun 1999 | A |
6234748 | Brown et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6264440 | Klein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6997686 | Agrawal | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7429160 | Roudnev et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7544041 | Mayleben et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7785082 | Mitsuda et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7988411 | Lienau et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8398361 | Sagoo et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8419347 | Pomfret | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8870521 | Brecht et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9188134 | Ure | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20010007632 | Pesek et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030180142 | Onoda et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20070160465 | Roudnev et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070280823 | Kanemori | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20120156012 | Ure Villoria | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130209225 | Eslinger | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140037440 | Frater et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150156012 | Alahmadi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150260190 | Bergamini | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2599092 | Nov 1987 | FR |
2921445 | Mar 2009 | FR |
2014214714 | Nov 2014 | JP |
101537714 | Jul 2015 | KR |
9804837 | Feb 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“MSD Multi-Stage Dual Volute Pumps,” Sulzer, sulzer.com, Dec. 10, 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20151210155710/http://www.sulzer.com/en/-/media/Documents/ProductsAndServices/Pumps_and_Systems/Axially_Split_Pumps/Presentations/MSD_presentation.pdf. |
“DMX Between Bearings, Axially Split, Multistage Pump,” Flowserve, eee.flowserve.com, May 2014. http://www.flowserve.com/files/Files/Literature/ProductLiterature/Pumps/ps-30-3-e.pdf. |
“Radial & Axial Thrust in Centrifugal Pumps,” KelairPumps, kelairpumps.com.au, Dec. 9, 2006. http://www.kelairpumps.com.au/images/stories/PDF/PumpClinic/PumpClinic12.pdf. |
Marscher, William D., “Avoiding Failures in Centrifugal Pumps,” Proceedings of the International Pump Users Symposium. 2002. http://www.turbolab.tamu.edu/proc/pumpproc/P19/15.pdf. |
English Language Abstract of KR101537714B1. |
English Language Abstract of JP2014214714(A). |
English Language Abstract of FR2599092(A1). |
English language Abstract of FR2921445. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170184115 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62263982 | Dec 2015 | US |