A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.
1. Field
This disclosure relates to waveguide devices used to combine or separate two orthogonal modes, also known as ortho-mode transducers (OMTs).
2. Description of the Related Art
Satellite broadcasting and communications systems may use a first signal having a first polarization state for the uplink to the satellite and a second signal having a second polarization state, orthogonal to the first polarization state, for the downlink from the satellite. Note that two circularly polarized signals are orthogonal if the e-field vectors rotate in the opposite directions. The polarization directions for the uplink and downlink signals may be determined by the antenna and feed network on the satellite.
A common form of antenna for transmitting and receiving signals from satellites consists of a parabolic dish reflector and a feed network where orthogonally polarized modes travel in a common waveguide. The common waveguide may typically be cylindrical or square, but may be elliptical or rectangular. In this patent, the term “cylindrical waveguide” means a waveguide segment shaped as a right circular cylinder, which is to say the cross-sectional shape of the waveguide segment is circular. Similarly, the terms “elliptical waveguide”, “rectangular waveguide”, and “square waveguide” mean a waveguide segment having an elliptical, rectangular, or square cross-sectional shape, respectively. An ortho-mode transducer may be used to launch or extract the orthogonal linearly polarized modes into or from the cylindrical waveguide.
An ortho-mode transducer (OMT) is a three-port waveguide device having a common waveguide coupled to two branching waveguides. Within this description, the term “port” refers generally to an interface between devices or between a device and free space. A port of a waveguide device may be formed by an aperture in an interfacial surface to allow microwave radiation to enter or exit a waveguide within the device.
The common waveguide of an OMT typically supports two orthogonal linearly polarized modes. Within this document, the terms “support” and “supporting” mean that a waveguide will allow propagation of a mode with little or no loss. In a feed system for a satellite antenna, the common waveguide may be a cylindrical waveguide. The two orthogonal linearly polarized modes may be TE11 modes which have an electric field component orthogonal to the axis of the common waveguide. When the cylindrical waveguide is partially filled with a dielectric material, the two orthogonal linearly polarized modes may be hybrid HE11 modes which have at least some electric field component along the propagation axis. Two precisely orthogonal TE11 or HE11 modes do not interact or cross-couple, and can therefore be used to communicate different information.
The common waveguide terminates at a common port, which is to say that a common port aperture is defined by the intersection of the common waveguide and an exterior surface of the OMT.
Each of the two branching waveguides of an OMT typically supports only a single linearly polarized TE10 mode. The mode supported by the first branching waveguide is orthogonal to the mode supported by the second branching waveguide. Within this document, the term “orthogonal” will be used to describe the polarization direction of modes, and “normal” will be used to describe geometrically perpendicular structures.
A traditional OMT, for example as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,908, has one branch waveguide axially aligned with the common waveguide, and one branch waveguide normal to the common waveguide. The branch waveguide that is axially aligned with the common waveguide terminates at what is commonly called the vertical port. The linearly polarized mode supported by the vertical port is commonly called the vertical mode. The branch waveguide which is normal to the common waveguide is terminated at what is commonly called the horizontal port. The branch waveguide that terminates at the horizontal port also supports only a single polarized mode commonly called the horizontal mode.
The terms “horizontal” and “vertical” will be used in this document to denote the two orthogonal modes and the waveguides and ports supporting those modes. Note, however, that these terms do not connote any particular orientation of the modes or waveguides with respect to the physical horizontal and vertical directions.
Elements in the drawings are assigned reference numbers which remain constant among the figures. An element not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to be the same as a previously-described element having the same reference number.
Description of Apparatus
The OMT 100 may include a vertical port and a vertical branch waveguide not visible in
The vertical port may be opposed to the horizontal port 140, which is to say that the vertical port and the horizontal port may be disposed on parallel surfaces facing in opposite directions. The vertical port may be disposed on a bottom surface (not visible) of the OMT 100 that faces downward as in
The horizontal branch waveguide 130 may include a first segment 132 and a second segment 134. The first segment 132 and the second segment 134 may be configured to couple a first TE11 mode from the horizontal branch waveguide 130 to the cylindrical common waveguide 110. The first segment 132 and the second segment 134 may be ridged waveguides. Dividing a horizontal branch waveguide into two segments is exemplary. A branch waveguide within an OMT may have more or fewer than two segments. At least one of the segments may be a ridged waveguide.
Referring back to
The first vertical waveguide segment 152 and the third vertical waveguide segment 156 of the vertical branch waveguide 150 may have generally rectangular cross-sections. A cross sectional area of the third vertical waveguide segment 156 may be smaller than a cross-sectional area of the first vertical waveguide segment 152. The second vertical waveguide segment 154 may provide a transition between the first vertical waveguide segment 152 and the smaller area of the third vertical waveguide segment 156. The first vertical waveguide segment 152, the second vertical waveguide segment 154, and the third vertical waveguide segment 156 may, in combination, provide impedance matching from a standard rectangular waveguide (see 164 in
The cross-sectional shapes of the first, second, and third vertical waveguide segments 152, 154, 156 are exemplary and specific to the embodiment shown in the figures. Other embodiments of the OMT may include a vertical branch waveguide including one or more ridged waveguide segments.
The internal structure of the OMT may be understood through consideration of
An OMT, such as the OMT 100, may be designed such that the segments of the common waveguide and the vertical and horizontal branch waveguides having the largest cross-sectional areas are adjacent to the corresponding common, vertical or horizontal port. Additionally, an OMT may be designed such that the cross-sectional area of each succeeding waveguide segment is smaller than, and contained within, the cross-sectional area of the preceding waveguide segment. “Contained within” means that the entire perimeter of each succeeding waveguide section is visible through the aperture formed by the preceding waveguide section. With such a design, each waveguide section may be formed by machining through the aperture of the preceding waveguide section. Thus each waveguide section may be formed by a numerically controlled machining operation with an end mill or other machine tool, and the number of machining operation steps may be equal to the total number of waveguide segments.
The OMT 100 and other OMT devices designed according to the same principles may be formed in a series of machining operations without assembly or joining operations such as soldering, brazing, bonding, or welding. An OMT designed according to these principles may be formed from a single piece of material. The single piece may be initially a solid block of material. The OMT may be formed from a solid block of a conductive metal material such as aluminum or copper. The OMT may be also formed from a solid block of dielectric material, such as a plastic, which would then be coated with a conductive material, such as a film of a metal such as aluminum or copper, after the machining operations were completed. If justified by the production quantity, a blank approximating the shape of the OMT could be formed prior the machining operations. The blank could be either metal or dielectric material and could be formed by a process such as casting or injection molding.
An OMT, such as the OMT 100, may be designed using a commercial software package such as CST Microwave Studio. An initial model of the OMT may be generated with estimated dimensions for the common waveguide, horizontal branch waveguide, and vertical branch waveguide. The structure may then be analyzed, and the reflection coefficients and cross coupling may be determined for two orthogonal linearly polarized modes introduced respectively at the two branch ports. The dimensions of the model may then be iterated manually or automatically to minimize the reflection coefficients across an operating frequency band.
The solid line 710 is a graph of the return S2(1),2(1) at the receive port (horizontal port) of the OMT, and the dashed line 720 is a graph of the return S3(1),3(1) at the transmit port (vertical port) of the OMT. The returns S2(1),2(1) and S3(1),3(1) are less than −24 dB over the operating bandwidth of the OMT.
Referring now to
With the exception of the shape of a flange 825 that joins the OMT 810 to the cylindrical waveguide device 830, the OMT 810 may be similar to the OMT shown in
The OMT 810 may include a vertical port, not visible in
A common waveguide (not shown) within the OMT 810 may have a shape other than cylindrical. In this case, the OMT may include a converter between its internal common waveguide and the cylindrical waveguide device 830.
The flange 825 of OMT 810 may be coupled to the flange 840 of the cylindrical waveguide device 830 using bolts, rivets, or other fasteners (not shown). The flanges 825, 840, and 845 are representative of typical feed network structures. However, the OMT 810 and the cylindrical waveguide device 830 may be fabricated as a single piece, or may be coupled by soldering, bonding, welding, or other method not requiring the use of the flanges 825, 840, and 845 and/or fasteners.
A rotatable polarizer element may be disposed within the OMT 810 and the cylindrical waveguide device 830. The rotatable polarizer element may be a hollow tube polarizer as described in U.S. Pat. No, 7,772,940. The rotatable polarizer element may be a filter-polarizer element as described in copending patent application Ser. No. 13/045,808. The term “filter-polarizer” is used to describe this element because it functions both as a phase shifting element to change the polarization state of signals propagating in the cylindrical waveguide, and as a filter to inhibit propagation of one or more undesired modes. The only portions of the rotatable polarizer element visible in
Closing Comments
Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of apparatus elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. Elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.
For means-plus-function limitations recited in the claims, the means are not intended to be limited to the means disclosed herein for performing the recited function, but are intended to cover in scope any means, known now or later developed, for performing the recited function.
As used herein, “plurality” means two or more.
As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items.
As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of ”and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2716221 | Allen | Aug 1955 | A |
2783439 | Whitehorn | Feb 1957 | A |
3164789 | Grosbois et al. | Jan 1965 | A |
3201717 | Grosbois et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3758882 | Morz | Sep 1973 | A |
3932822 | Salzberg | Jan 1976 | A |
4523160 | Ploussios | Jun 1985 | A |
4613836 | Evans | Sep 1986 | A |
4725795 | Ajioka et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4806945 | Cormier et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4849720 | Call | Jul 1989 | A |
4951010 | Grim | Aug 1990 | A |
4982171 | Figlia et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5376905 | Kich | Dec 1994 | A |
5392008 | Wong | Feb 1995 | A |
6087908 | Haller et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6166610 | Ramanujam et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6225875 | Kich | May 2001 | B1 |
6297710 | Cook et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6417742 | Enokuma | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6496084 | Monte et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6677911 | Moheb | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6842085 | Chen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6904394 | Jaffrey | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7019603 | Yoneda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7236681 | Moheb et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7330088 | Aramaki et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7656246 | Mahon et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7772940 | Mahon et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20040032305 | Bohnet | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040160292 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070210882 | Mahon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Rong et al . Characteritics of Generalized Rectangular and Ciruclar Ridge Waveguide, Feb. 200, IEEE Transactuins on Microwave Theory and Technigues, vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 258-265. |
Eric S. Key, General Cylinder (C), Dec. 30, 1999, article, https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/ericskey/www/TANOTES/Geomentry/node19.html9/30/2010, accessed on Sep. 30, 2010. |
Perov, A.O., et al., Orthomode Transducers with a Common Circular Waveguide, Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 2007, vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 626-632. |
Anton M. Boifot, Classification of Ortho-Mode Transducers, European Transactions on Telecommunications, Sep. 1991, vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 503-510. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120306592 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |