The invention pertains to a system for the management and routing of optical fiber cables.
In the telecommunications industry, the use of optical fibers for signal transmissions is accelerating. With the increased utilization of optical fiber systems, optical fiber cable management requires industry attention.
One area where optical fiber management is necessary is the routing of optical fibers from one piece of optical fiber equipment to another. For example, in a telecommunications facility, optical fiber cables may be routed between fiber distribution equipment and optical line terminating equipment. In buildings and other structures which carry such equipment, the cable routing can take place in concealed ceiling areas or in any other manner to route cables from one location to another.
When routing optical fibers, it is desirable that any routing system will be readily modifiable and adaptable to changes in equipment needs. Accordingly, a routing system is not practical which would require a high capital outlay and which could not be readily adapted to changes in a customer's needs. Namely, if routing paths, once established, are forever fixed, the system cannot adapt. Also, and perhaps most important, any routing system must protect optical fibers from damage. In the use of optical fibers, it is recognized that the fibers should not be bent beyond a minimum radius of curvature. For example, it is commonly recognized that optical fibers should not be bent in a radius of less than 1.5 inches.
According to preferred embodiments of the present invention, a cable routing system is disclosed for routing optical fiber cables between optical transmission equipment. The system includes a lateral trough section configured for defining a cable pathway. An exit trough is mountable to the lateral trough section to provide a cable exit pathway from the lateral trough section. The exit trough includes a bracket portion mountable to a top edge of the lateral trough section. Two curved lead-ins on opposite ends of the bracket portion each define a cable pathway leading to an exit trough portion extending from a middle of the bracket portion in a direction away from the lateral trough section. The exit trough portion includes a convexly curved bottom trough surface, and two convexly curved upstanding sides on opposite sides of the bottom trough surface. The exit trough defines a cable pathway leading upwardly and away from the lateral trough section. The exit trough is mountable to the lateral trough section without modification to the lateral trough section. The exit trough can be placed generally at any location along the lateral trough section, and can be placed during initial system setup, or at a later time as the need arises for an exit pathway from the lateral trough section, such as when new optical transmission equipment is added to the system. At least one fastener secures the bracket portion to the lateral trough section. The exit trough may include a downspout portion defining a downwardly directed cable pathway, or a horizontal portion defining a horizontally directed cable pathway, or other directional pathway as desired.
Referring now to
Generally, lateral trough section 20 includes first and second upstanding sides 24, 26, and a bottom 28 extending therebetween and defining cable pathway 22. Side 24 includes a top edge 30. Opposite side 26 also includes similar top edge 32. Lateral trough section 20 includes a plurality of attachment members 34 on an outside portion for use in attaching lateral trough sections 20 together end to end, or adding other system hardware.
As will be described below, exit trough 100 mounts to lateral trough section 20 adjacent to top edge 30 of side 24 through attachment member 34. Exit trough 100 creates a cable exit pathway from lateral trough section 20.
Exit trough 100 includes a bracket portion 102 including an outer projecting member 104, an inner projecting member 106, and a connecting member 108. Bracket portion 102 generally defines a U-shape for receipt of a portion of side 24 such that top edge 30 is positioned adjacent to connecting member 108. Exit trough 100 conveniently and securely mounts to lateral trough section 20 via one or more fasteners 170 positioned through outer projecting member 104 and engaged with attachment member 34 of lateral trough section 20, as shown in
For protection of the optical fiber cables, inner projecting member 106 of bracket portion 102 includes tapered ends 110, 112, and a tapered middle 114. Bracket portion 102 generally extends from a first end 116 to a second end 118. A middle 120 is positioned between the first and second ends 116, 118. At first and second ends 116, 118, two cable lead-ins 124, 134 are provided. First lead-in 124 includes an upper surface portion 126 having an upwardly curved shape. A downwardly depending flange 128 extends toward bottom 28 of lateral trough section 20. Flange 128 is spaced apart from inner projecting member 106 of bracket portion 102 to define a cable pathway 130. Second lead-in 134 at an opposite end of bracket portion 102 faces in an opposite direction to first lead-in 124. Second lead-in 134 includes a similarly configured upwardly curved surface 136, and a downwardly depending flange 138 defining a cable pathway 140 for cables entering exit trough 100 from an opposite end of lateral trough section 20.
Exit trough 100 includes an exit trough portion 144 extending from bracket portion 102 at middle 120 away from lateral trough section 20. Exit trough portion 144 includes a bottom trough surface 146 and upstanding sides 148, 150 on opposite sides of bottom trough surface 146. Generally bottom trough surface 146 extends upwardly and away from top edge 30 of lateral trough section 20, and includes a convex shape. Upstanding sides 148, 150 extend from each respective lead-in 124, 134, and also define convex shapes. Exit trough portion 144 defines a cable pathway 152 linked to cable pathway 22 of lateral trough section 20 via cable pathways 130, 140 of lead-ins 124, 134.
In exit trough 100, exit trough portion 144 links lateral trough section 20 to a downspout 160. Downspout 160 generally provides a cable pathway for cable exiting in a downward direction relative to lateral trough section 20. Downspout 160 is supported by two side ribs 164 and a center rib 166 connected to bracket portion 104b.
With exit trough 100 mounted to lateral trough section 20, cable extending generally horizontally to the ground through lateral trough section 20 is allowed to route upwardly and away from lateral trough section 20, and then to route downwardly through downspout 160 for connection to optical transmission equipment, or other uses. Downspout 160 is connectable via any suitable means to other cable routing components, such as vertical troughs or conduit, as desired. The various curves provided with exit trough 100 help protect the optical fiber cables from being bent beyond a minimum radius of curvature.
Referring now to
A second main difference between the second exit trough 200 and the first exit trough 100, is that lead-ins 224, 234 and exit trough portion 244 are sized to define larger cable pathways 230, 240, and 252. Specifically, upper surface portions 226, 236 and flanges 228, 238 are sized for defining the larger pathways 230, 240 relative to pathways 130, 140 of first exit trough 100. Also upstanding sides 248, 250 are taller and spaced further apart to define larger pathway 252 relative to pathway 152 of first exit trough 100. This illustrates that relative sizes of the features of exit troughs 100, 200 can be varied depending on the cable routing needs in the system.
Each of the disclosed exit troughs 100, 200 allows for exit pathways from the lateral trough section 20 without modification to the lateral trough section 20. This is useful during initial system setup, and also during modifications of the system at later dates. Exit troughs 100, 200 can be added at any time quickly and easily. Cable damage is avoided since any cables in lateral trough section 20 are not disturbed and do not have to be moved when exit troughs 100, 200 are added. Also, simple fasteners are all that is needed to mount the bracket portion 102 of the exit troughs 100, 200 to the lateral trough section 20. In addition to the downspout 160, and the horizontal portion 202, other directional components are possible from exit trough portions 144, 244 of each exit trough 100, 200.
Having described the present invention in a preferred embodiment, modifications and equivalents may occur to one skilled in the art. It is intended that such modifications and equivalents shall be included within the scope of the claims which are appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/148,880, filed Apr. 22, 2008; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/636,373, filed Dec. 7, 2006; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/158,287, filed Jun. 21, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,167,625; which is continuation of application Ser. No. 10/871,641, filed Jun. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,242; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/457,749, filed Jun. 9, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,868,220; which is a continuation application of Ser. No. 09/745,299, filed Dec. 20, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,854; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/354,594, filed Jul. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,181; which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/971,421, filed Nov. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,937,131. The above listed applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3001001 | Bibb | Sep 1961 | A |
4163572 | Benscoter | Aug 1979 | A |
4366341 | van Riet | Dec 1982 | A |
4860168 | Wiljanen et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4926009 | Van Leeuwen | May 1990 | A |
5067678 | Henneberger et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5142606 | Carney et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5271585 | Zetena | Dec 1993 | A |
5316243 | Henneberger | May 1994 | A |
5316244 | Zetena, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5399814 | Staber et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402515 | Vidacovich et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5530787 | Arnett | Jun 1996 | A |
5753855 | Nicoli et al. | May 1998 | A |
5872336 | Long | Feb 1999 | A |
5937131 | Haataja et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6044194 | Meyerhoefer | Mar 2000 | A |
6192181 | Haataja et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6597854 | Haataja et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6868220 | Haataja et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6925242 | Haataja et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7167625 | Haataja et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20070253672 | Haataja et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080199141 | Haataja et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110229103 | Haataja | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 42 448 | Jun 1989 | DE |
1207610 | Jun 1958 | FR |
2488064 | Jul 1980 | FR |
2137025 | Feb 1984 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Examiner's Determination under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(d), in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411, dated Jun. 8, 2012, 24 pages. |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Examiner's Determination under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(d), in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415, dated Jun. 8, 2012, 23 pages. |
Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 37 CFR § 1.302, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412, dated Apr. 23, 2012, 61 pages. |
Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 37 CFR § 1.302, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413, dated Apr. 23, 2012, 43 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373; dated Jun. 19, 2012; 24 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/148,880; dated Oct. 8, 2008; 17 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/148,880; dated Apr. 15, 2009; 14 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/148,880; dated Mar. 27, 2012; 25 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Brief for Appellant, Panduit Corp. in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413, dated Aug. 6, 2012, 90 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Brief for Appellant, Panduit Corp. in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412, dated Aug. 6, 2012, 120 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 41.79, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411, dated Jul. 6, 2012, 10 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 41.79, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415, dated Jul. 6, 2012, 11 pages. |
Patent Owner's Principal and Response Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412 dated Oct. 4, 2012, 96 pages. |
Patent Owner's Principal and Response Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413 dated Oct. 4, 2012, 92 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Comments on Patentees' Response Requesting Reopening of Prosecution with attachments in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411 dated Sep. 22, 2011. |
Office Action in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411 mailed Oct. 7, 2011. |
Third Party Requester's Comments on Patentees' Response Requesting Reopening of Prosecution with attachments in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415 dated Sep. 22, 2011. |
Office Action in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415 mailed Oct. 14, 2011. |
Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. §41.77(e) in Response to Examiner's Determination in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411 dated Nov. 4, 2011. |
Patent Owner's Reply to Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(e) in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411 dated Dec. 5, 2011. |
Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. §41.77(e) in Response to Examiner's Determination in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415 dated Nov. 14, 2011. |
Patent Owner's Reply to Third Party Requester's Comments Under 37 C.F.R. § 41.77(e) in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415 dated Dec. 13, 2011. |
ADC Telecommunications brochure entitled “FiberGuide® Fiber Management Systems,” 33 pages, dated Oct. 1995. |
Warren & Brown & Staff brochure pages entitled “lightpaths,” Issue 2, 11 pages, dated 1995. |
Warren & Brown & Staff Pty Ltd. Brochure pages entitled “Optical Fibre Ductwork,” 2 pages, undated. |
ADC Telecommunications brochure entitled “Fiber Guide™ Fiber Management System,” 6 pages, dated Jun. 1989. |
AT&T Network Systems literature entitled, “Facility Network Management System,” 3 pages, the third page of which is dated Mar. 27, 1991. |
AT&T advertisement literature entitled, “Facility Network Management System” believed to correspond to system shown in Exhibit E, p. 3 of which is dated Mar. 27, 1991. |
“Memorandum Opinion and Order” filed Apr. 24, 2002 by United States District Court Judge Ann Montgomery in the action titled ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil No. 01-477 ADM/AJB, pp. 1-24. |
“Defendant's Prior Art List” dated Oct. 1, 2001 in the action titled ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil Action No. 01-CV-477 ADM/AJB. pp. 1-29. |
“Report No. 02.3-02” by Eric Pearson of Pearson Technologies Incorporated, served Apr. 22, 2002 in the action titled ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil Action No. 01-CV-477 ADM/AJB. pp. 1-37 and Exhibits 1 and 2. |
“Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories” dated Dec. 14, 2001 in the action titled ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Fiber Management Solutions, Inc., Case No. CV 01 3974 ADS, pp. 1-12. |
Exhibit A, Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of 6,192,181; dated Nov. 6, 2008; 18 pages. |
Exhibit B, Ex Parte Communication re 6,192,181; dated Dec. 22, 2008; 9 pages. |
Exhibit C, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,597,854; dated Nov. 6, 2008; 95 pages. |
Exhibit D, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,868,220; dated Nov. 6, 2008; 37 pages. |
Exhibit E, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,925,242; dated Nov. 6, 2008; 40 pages. |
Exhibit F, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of 7,167,625; dated Nov. 6, 2008; 26 pages. |
Exhibit G, Decision Granting Ex Parte Reexamination of 6,192,181; dated Dec. 22, 2008; 10 pages. |
Exhibit H, Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,597,854; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 14 pages. |
Exhibit I, Office Action in 6,597,854 Reexamination; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 18 pages. |
Exhibit J, Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,868,220; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 13 pages. |
Exhibit K, Office Action in 6,868,220 Reexamination; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 15 pages. |
Exhibit L, Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of 6,925,242; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 12 pages. |
Exhibit M, Office Action in 6,925,242 Reexamination; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 15 pages. |
Exhibit N, Decision Granting Inter Partes Reexamination of 7,167,625; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 12 pages. |
Exhibit O, Office Action in 7,167,625 Reexamination; dated Jan. 12, 2009; 15 pages. |
Exhibit P, First Amended Complaint, ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil Action No. 07-CV-04452-DWF-SRN, 6 pages (Aug. 4, 2008). |
Exhibit Q, Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims of Defendant Panduit Corp. to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil Action No. 07-CV-04452-DWF-SRN, 13 pages (Sep. 22, 2008). |
Exhibit R, ADC's Reply to Counterclaims, ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Panduit Corp., Civil Action No. 07-CV-04452-DWF-SRN, 5 pages (Oct. 13, 2008). |
Exhibit S, Third Party Requester's Reply in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Apr. 13, 2009; 23 pages. |
Exhibit T, Third Party Requester's Reply in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Apr. 13, 2009; 28 pages. |
Exhibit U, Third Party Requester's Reply in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Apr. 13, 2009; 21 pages. |
Exhibit V, Third Party Requester's Reply in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Apr. 13, 2009; 33 pages. |
Exhibit W, Office Action in 6,192,181 Reexamination; dated May 1, 2009; 8 pages. |
Exhibit X, Office Action in 6,597,854 Reexamination; dated Jul. 2, 2009; 30 pages. |
Exhibit Y, Office Action in 6,868,220 Reexamination; dated Jul. 13, 2009; 23 pages. |
Exhibit Z, Office Action in 6,925,242 Reexamination; dated Jul. 14, 2009; 19 pages. |
Exhibit AA, Office Action in 7,167,625 Reexamination; dated Jul. 13, 2009; 17 pages. |
Exhibit AB, Office Action in 6,192,181 Reexamination; dated Nov. 20, 2009; 10 pages. |
Exhibit AC, Right of Appeal Notice in 6,597,854 Re-examination; dated Dec. 4, 2009; 19 pages. |
Exhibit AD, Right of Appeal Notice in 6,868,220 Re-examination; dated Dec. 4, 2009; 17 pages. |
Exhibit AE, Right of Appeal Notice in 6,925,242 Re-examination; dated Dec. 14, 2009; 14 pages. |
Exhibit AF, Right of Appeal Notice in 7,167,625 Re-examination; dated Dec. 14, 2009; 13 pages. |
Exhibit AG, Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Dec. 11, 2002; Case No. 01-477 ADM/JGL. |
Exhibit AH, Third Party Requester's Appeal Brief in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Jun. 7, 2010; 77 pages. |
Exhibit AI, Third Party Requester's Appeal Brief in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Mar. 19, 2010; 56 pages. |
Exhibit AJ, Third Party Requester's Appeal Brief in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Jun. 7, 2010; 57 pages. |
Exhibit AK, Third Party Requester's Appeal Brief in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Mar. 22, 2010; 39 pages. |
Exhibit AL, Third Party Requester's Response in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Jun. 7, 2010; 31 pages. |
Exhibit AM, Third Party Requester's Response in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Jun. 7, 2010; 30 pages. |
Exhibit AN, Third Party Requester's Response in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Jun. 7, 2010; 30 pages. |
Exhibit AO, Third Party Requester's Response in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Apr. 22, 2010; 26 pages. |
Exhibit AP, Examiner's Answer in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Sep. 13, 2010; 3 pages. |
Exhibit AQ, Examiner's Answer in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Sep. 13, 2010; 3 pages. |
Exhibit AR, Examiner's Answer in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Sep. 20, 2010; 3 pages. |
Exhibit AS, Examiner's Answer in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Sep. 13, 2010; 3 pages. |
Exhibit AT, Third Party Requester's Rebuttal Brief in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Oct. 13, 2010; 27 pages. |
Exhibit AU, Third Party Requester's Rebuttal Brief in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Oct. 13, 2010; 18 pages. |
Exhibit AV, Third Party Requester's Rebuttal Brief in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Oct. 20, 2010; 21 pages. |
Exhibit AW, Third Party Requester's Rebuttal Brief in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Oct. 13, 2010; 17 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373, dated Feb. 22, 2010; 26 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 09/745,299; dated Dec. 18, 2001; 8 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/457,749; dated Sep. 12, 2003; 4 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/871,641; dated Sep. 29, 2004; 5 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,287; dated Dec. 13, 2005; 5 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373; dated Sep. 11, 2007; 4 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373; dated Apr. 29, 2008; 16 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373; dated Nov. 25, 2008; 3 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373; dated Jul. 21, 2009; 19 pages. |
Record of Oral Hearing, mailed Jun. 7, 2011, for the Oral Hearing held on Mar. 9, 2011 in 6,597,854; 6,868,220; 6,925,242; and 7,167,625 Reexaminations (77 Pages). |
Decision on Appeal in 6,597,854 Reexamination, dated Jun. 22, 2011; (60 pages). |
Decision on Appeal in 6,868,220 Reexamination, dated Jun. 22, 2011; (47 pages). |
Decision on Appeal in 6,925,242 Reexamination, dated Jun. 22, 2011; (61 pages). |
Decision on Appeal in 7,167,625 Reexamination, dated Jun. 22, 2011; (36 pages). |
Haataja et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,557, filed May 31, 2011, titled “Optical Cable Exit Trough,” which claims priority to the present application. |
Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,412; dated Jul. 22, 2011. |
Patentee' Response to Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing in Reexamination; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,412; dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,413; dated Jul. 22, 2011. |
Patentee' Response to Third Party Requester's Request for Rehearing in Reexamination; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,413; dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
Patent Owner's Response Requesting Reopening of Prosecution; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,411; dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
Patent Owner's Response Requesting Reopening of Prosecution; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,415; dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
Declaration of David E. Rapp; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,411; dated Jun. 22, 2011; 5 pgs. |
Declaration of David E. Rapp; U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,415 dated Jun. 22, 2011; 5 pgs. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/148,880; dated Dec. 21, 2012; 27 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 12/148,880; dated May 9, 2013; 17 pages. |
Director of Patent Office Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413 dated Feb. 13, 2013, 49 pages. |
Director of Patent Office Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412 dated Feb. 13, 2013, 64 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Response and Reply Brief for Appellant, Panduit Corp. in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413, dated Feb. 27, 2013, 59 pages. |
Third Party Requester's Response and Reply Brief for Appellant, Panduit Corp. in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412, dated Feb. 27, 2013, 76 pages. |
Patent Owner's Reply Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412 dated Mar. 18, 2013, 35 pages. |
Patent Owner's Reply Brief in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413 dated Mar. 18, 2013, 28 pages. |
Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 37 CFR § 1.302, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411, dated May 21, 2013, 37 pages. |
Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under 37 CFR § 1.302, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415, dated Apr. 26, 2011, 42 pages. |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Rehearing, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,411, dated Mar. 27, 2013, 12 pages. |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Rehearing, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,412, dated Feb. 23, 2012, 12 pages. |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Rehearing, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,413, dated Feb. 24, 2012, 5 pages. |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Decision on Rehearing, in Reexamination Control No. 95/000,415, dated Feb. 27, 2013, 17 pages. |
Office Action from related U.S. Appl. No. 11/636,373, dated Apr. 24, 2013, 27 pages. |
Brief for Appellant for Control No. 95/000,415, Panduit Corporation, Sep. 11, 2013, 165 pages. |
Brief for Appellant for Control No. 95/000,411, Panduit Corporation, Oct. 8, 2013, 155 pages. |
Appellee ADC Telecommunications, Inc.'s Response Brief for Control No. 95/000,415, Oct. 24, 2013, 58 pages. |
Cross Appellant ADC Telecommunications, Inc.'s Principal and Response Brief for Control No. 95/000,411, Nov. 22, 2013, 94 pages. |
Appellant Panduit Corporation's Reply in Further Support of Opposed Motion Requesting Judicial Notice of Dictionary Definitions for Control No. 95/000,415, Dec. 5, 2013, 11 pages. |
Response and Reply Brief for Appellant for Control No. 95/000,411, Panduit Corporation, Jan. 3, 2014, 63 pages. |
Brief for Appellant for Control No. 95/000,411, Panduit Corporation, Jan. 21, 2014, 38 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110225797 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08971421 | Nov 1997 | US |
Child | 09354594 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12148880 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13149590 | US | |
Parent | 11636373 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12148880 | US | |
Parent | 11158287 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11636373 | US | |
Parent | 10871641 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11158287 | US | |
Parent | 10457749 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10871641 | US | |
Parent | 09745299 | Dec 2000 | US |
Child | 10457749 | US | |
Parent | 09354594 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 09745299 | US |