After a wellbore has been drilled, the wellbore typically is cased by inserting lengths of steel pipe (“casing sections”) connected end-to-end into the wellbore. Threaded exterior rings called couplings or collars are typically used to connect adjacent ends of the casing sections at casing joints. The result is a “casing string” including casing sections and connecting collars that extends from the surface to a bottom of the wellbore. The casing string is then cemented in place to complete the casing operation.
After a wellbore is cased, the casing is often perforated to provide access to a desired formation, e.g., to enable formation fluids to enter the well bore. Such perforating operations require the ability to position a tool at a particular and known position in the well. One method for determining the position of the perforating tool is to count the number of collars that the tool passes as it is lowered into the wellbore. As the length of each of the steel casing sections of the casing string is known, correctly counting a number of collars or joints traversed by a device as the device is lowered into a well enables an accurate determination of a depth or location of the tool in the well. Such counting can be accomplished with a casing collar locator (“CCL”), an instrument that may be attached to the perforating tool and suspended in the wellbore with a wireline.
A wireline is an armored cable having one or more electrical conductors to facilitate the transfer of power and communications signals between the surface electronics and the downhole tools. Such cables can be tens of thousands of feet long and subject to extraneous electrical noise interference and crosstalk. In certain applications, the detection of signals from conventional casing collar locators may not be reliably communicated via the wireline.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the detailed description is considered in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various alternative forms, equivalents, and modifications, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto do not limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, they provide the foundation for alternative forms, equivalents, and modifications falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The problems outlined above are at least in part addressed by casing collar locator (CCL) systems and methods that provide optical detection signals. In at least some embodiments, the casing collar locator system includes a sonde configured to be conveyed through a casing string by a fiber optic cable. The sonde includes at least one permanent magnet producing a magnetic field that changes in response to passing a collar in the casing string, a coil that receives at least a portion of the magnetic field and provides an electrical signal in response to the changes in the magnetic field, and a light source that responds to the electrical signal to communicate light along an optical fiber to indicate passing collars. Methods for using the sonde to locate casing collars in the casing string are also described.
Turning now to the figures,
In the embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiment, the winch 24 includes an optical slip ring 28 that enables the drum of the winch 24 to rotate while making an optical connection between the optical fiber 19 and a fixed port of the slip ring 28. A surface unit 30 is connected to the port of the slip ring 28 to send and/or receive optical signals via the optical fiber 19. In other embodiments, the winch 24 includes an electrical slip ring 28 to send and/or receive electrical signals from the surface unit 30 and a drum-mounted electro-optical interface that translates the signals from the optical fiber for communication via the slip ring and vice versa.
The sonde 12 includes an optical fiber 26 coupled to the optical fiber 19 of the fiber optic cable 18. The surface unit 30 receives signals from the sonde 12 via the optical fibers 19 and 26, and in at least some embodiments transmits signals to the sonde via the optical fibers 19 and 26. When the sonde 12 passes a collar in the casing string 16 (e.g. the collar 22), the sonde communicates this event to the surface unit 30 via the optical fibers 19 and 26.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
The magnets 32A and 32B both produce magnetic fields that pass or “cut” through the windings of the coil 36. The magnet 32A and the adjacent walls of the casing string 16 form a first magnetic circuit through which most of the magnetic field produced by the magnet 32A passes. Similarly, the magnetic field produced by the magnet 32B passes through a second magnetic circuit including the magnet 32B and the adjacent walls of the casing string 16. The intensities of the magnetic fields produced by the magnets 32A and 32B depend on the sums of the magnetic reluctances of the elements in each of the magnetic circuits. Any change in the intensities of the magnetic field produced by the magnet 32A and/or the magnetic field produced by the magnet 32B cutting through the coil 36 causes an electrical voltage to be induced between the two ends of the coil 36 (in accordance with Faraday's Law of Induction).
As the sonde 12 of
Other configurations of the sonde 12 exist and may be employed. Any arrangement of magnet(s) and/or coil(s) that offers the desired sensitivity to passing casing collars can be used.
Signal transformer 38 can take a variety of forms.
Where an LED is employed, it may be operated in the very low-power regime (20-100 microamps) to keep the diode near ambient temperature. Due to quantum effects, the LED will generally still radiate sufficient photons for reliable communication with the surface electronics.
The voltage source 240 produces a DC bias voltage that improves the responsiveness of the light source 244. The voltage source 240 may be or include, for example, a chemical battery, a fuel cell, a nuclear battery, an ultra-capacitor, or a photovoltaic cell (driven by light received from the surface via an optical fiber). In some embodiments, the voltage source 240 produces a DC bias voltage that causes an electrical current to flow through the series circuit including the voltage source 240, the resistor 242, the LED 248, and the coil 36 (see
As the sonde 12 (see
The Zener diodes 246 is connected between the two terminals of the LED 248 to protect the LED 248 from excessive forward voltages. Other circuit elements for protecting the light source against large voltage excursions are known and may also be suitable. In some embodiments, the light source 244 may be or include, for example, an incandescent lamp, an arc lamp, a semiconductor laser, or a superluminescent diode. The DC bias voltage produced by the voltage source 240 may match a forward voltage threshold of one or more diodes in series with the light source 244.
In some embodiments, the switch 260 may be opened and closed at a relatively high rate, for example between 50 and 5,000 times (cycles) per second. The ratio of the amount of time that the switch 260 is closed during each cycle to the total cycle time (i.e., the duty cycle) of the switch 260 may also be selected to conserve electrical energy stored in the voltage source 240.
In the embodiment of
As the sonde 12 (see
In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, the voltage source 240 produces a DC bias voltage that causes a current to flow through the resistor 242, the diode 280 of the diode bridge 270, the LED 248, the diode 286 of the diode bridge 270, and the coil 36 (see
In other embodiments, the ends of the coil 36 (see
In some embodiments, the light 252 produced by the signal transformer 38 has an intensity that is (approximately) proportional to a magnitude of an electrical signal produced between the ends of the coil 36. For example, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that the LED 248 produces a first amount of light (i.e., light with a first intensity) when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is substantially zero, a second amount of light (i.e., light with a second intensity) that is greater than the first amount/intensity when a positive voltage pulse is produced between the ends of the coil 36, and a third amount of light (i.e., light with a third intensity) that is less than the first amount/intensity when a negative voltage pulse is produced between the ends of the coil 36.
In some embodiments, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 dependent upon one or more stored threshold voltage values. For example, a first threshold voltage value may be a positive voltage value that is less than an expected positive peak value, and a second threshold value may be a negative voltage value that is less than an expected negative peak value. The digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that the LED 248 produces the first amount of light (i.e., the first light intensity) when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is between the first threshold voltage value and the second threshold voltage value, the second amount of light (i.e., the second light intensity) when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than the first threshold voltage value, and the third amount of light (i.e., the third light intensity) when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than (more negative than) the second threshold voltage.
In other embodiments, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that a pulse rate of light produced by the LED 248 is dependent the electrical signal from the coil 36. For example, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that the LED 248 produces light: (i) at a first pulse rate when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is between the first threshold voltage value and the second threshold voltage value, (ii) at a second pulse rate when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than the first threshold voltage value, and (iii) at a third pulse rate when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than (more negative than) the second threshold voltage.
In other embodiments, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that durations of light pulses produced by the LED 248 are dependent on the electrical signal from the coil 36. For example, the digital control logic 300 may control the LED 248 such that the LED 248 produces light pulses having: (i) a first duration when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is between the first threshold voltage value and the second threshold voltage value, (ii) a second duration when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than the first threshold voltage value, and (iii) a third duration when the voltage between the ends of the coil 36 is greater than (more negative than) the second threshold voltage.
The method 340 further includes sensing changes in the magnetic field with a coil (e.g., the coil 36 of
In some embodiments, the electrical signal produced by the coil is biased with a voltage source to improve a responsiveness of the light source. In some embodiments, the biasing causes the light source to adjust the communicated light in proportion to a change in the electrical signal. The biasing may, for example, match a forward voltage threshold of one or more diodes in series with the light source.
The method 340 may also include detecting changes in light at the surface to determine positions of the collars. For example, the changes in the light, such as changes in intensity or pulse rate or pulse duration, may be monitored (e.g., by the surface unit 30 of
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the components of a series circuit can be re-ordered. As another example, the foregoing description discloses a wireline embodiment for explanatory purposes, but the principles are equally applicable to, e.g., a tubing-conveyed sonde with an optical fiber providing communications between the sonde and the surface. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This application is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/226,578, titled “Optical casing collar locator systems and methods” and filed Sep. 7, 2011 by inventors John Maida and Etienne Samson. The parent application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3019841 | Ternow et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
| 3603923 | Nelligan | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3773120 | Stroud et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3789292 | Bottoms | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3893021 | Meador et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3980881 | Veach et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4450406 | Bobb | May 1984 | A |
| 4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4794336 | Marlow et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4904940 | Rempt | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4933640 | Kuckes | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4986121 | Luscombe | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5037172 | Hekman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5095514 | Curtis | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5204619 | Beigbeder et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5208652 | Sonobe et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5429190 | Kilgore et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5626192 | Connell et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5675674 | Weis | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5712828 | Luscombe et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5754284 | Leblanc et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5808779 | Weis | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898517 | Weis | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5943293 | Luscombe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6128251 | Erath et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137621 | Wu | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6160762 | Luscombe et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6188645 | Maida et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188646 | Luscombe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195162 | Varnham et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6211964 | Luscombe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6256588 | Maida et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6268911 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6307809 | Luscombe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6408943 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6422084 | Fernald et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6522797 | Siems et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6591025 | Siems et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6731389 | Luscombe et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6789621 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6834233 | Economides et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6847034 | Shah et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6853604 | Spackman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6896056 | Mendez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6907170 | Maida | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6913083 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6931188 | Kersey et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6957574 | Ogle | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7006918 | Economides et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7077200 | Adnan et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104324 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7133582 | Moslehi et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7140435 | Defretin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7159468 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163055 | Coon et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7182134 | Wetzel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7195033 | Mayeu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7216710 | Welton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219729 | Bostick, III et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7219730 | Tilton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7245791 | Rambow et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7408645 | DiFoggio | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7409858 | Dria et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7413011 | Chee et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7458273 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7461547 | Terabayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7529434 | Taverner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7617873 | Lovell et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7641395 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7665543 | Bostick, III et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7669440 | Kersey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7854267 | Smith et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7864321 | Caron et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7900699 | Ramos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7938178 | Maida et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8035393 | Tenghamn et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8074713 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8135541 | Davis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8274400 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20030127232 | Bussear et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030205375 | Wright et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210403 | Luscombe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040165809 | Kersey et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050072678 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169794 | Welton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207279 | Chemali et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247082 | Kersey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271107 | Murakami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060081412 | Wright et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060157239 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010404 | Welton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107573 | Weusthof et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070126594 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070187648 | Welton et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070194948 | Hall et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080227668 | Welton et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227669 | Welton | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280789 | Welton et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090058422 | Tenghamn et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120640 | Kulakofsky et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143258 | Welton et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271115 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100158435 | Kersey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100309750 | Brady | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110084696 | Tenghamn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090496 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110100629 | Welton et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110105368 | Welton et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110109912 | Spross et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110116099 | Spross et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110139447 | Ramos et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308788 | Ravi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120013482 | Patel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120013893 | Maida et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120250017 | Morys et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130056202 | Maida et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130249705 | Sharp et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-20110193401 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO-2013141971 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013147996 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Angelidis, Diogenes et al., “Optical Micromachined Pressure Sensor for Aerospace Applications”, Optical Engineering, vol. 31, No. 8, (Aug. 1992), pp. 1636-1642. |
| Aratani, K. “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon”, IEEE Xplore, IEEE, 1993., pp. 230-235. |
| Hebb, Malcolm H., et al., “Tunnel Diodes”, General Electric Research Laboratory, Nov. 1959, 27 pgs., Research Information Services, Schenectady, NY, USA., 27 pgs. |
| Johnson, R. L., et al., “Miniature Instrument for the Measurement of Gap Thickness Using Poly-Chromatic Interferometry”, Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics, Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, (Unknown), 9 pgs. |
| MacDougall, Trevor W., et al., “Large Diameter Waveguide Bragg Grating Components and Their Application in Downhole Oil & Gas Sensing”, Weatherford International, Wallingford, CT, (Unknown), 12 pgs. |
| Maida, John L., et al., “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/226,578, filed Sep. 7, 2011, 26 pgs. |
| Putty, Michael W., et al., “Process Integration for Active Polysilicon Resonant Microstructures”, Sensors and Actuators, 20, (1989), pp. 143-151. |
| Tseng, Fan-Gang et al., “Polymer MEMS-Based Fabry-Perot Shear Stress Sensor”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 3, No. 6, (Dec. 2003), pp. 812-817. |
| Tudor, M.J. et al., “Silicon Resonator Sensors: Interrogation Techniques and Characteristics”, IEE Proceedings, vol. 135, Pt. D, No. 5, (Sep. 1988), pp. 364-368. |
| Unknown, “Optical Activation of a Silicon Vibrating Sensor”, Electronic Letters, vol. 22, No. 21, (Oct. 9, 1986), pp. 1097-1099. |
| Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/03655, filed May 24, 2011, 12 pgs. |
| “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Nov. 27, 2012, Appl No. PCT/US2012/054284, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods”, filed Sep. 7, 2012, 21 pgs. |
| “PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Jun. 27, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US2012/054284, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods”, filed Sep. 7, 2012, 5 pgs. |
| “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Dated Nov. 18, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US2013/024852, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods,” filed Feb. 6, 2013, 9 pgs. |
| “PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Dated Nov. 18, 2013 Appl No. PCT/US2013/024849, “Casing Collar Locator with Wireless Telemetry Support,” filed Feb. 6, 2013, 9 pgs. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,414, “Casing Collar Locator with Wireless Telemetry Support”, filed Mar. 21, 2012, 23 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Oct. 7, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/226,578, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods”, filed Sep. 7, 2011, 10 pgs. |
| “US Non-Final Office Action”, dated Sep. 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,414, “Casing Collar Locator with Wireless Telemetry Support,” filed Mar. 21, 2012, 17 pgs. |
| “IPRP”, Dated Apr. 15, 2014, Appl No. PCT/US2013/024849, “Casing Collar Locator with Wireless Telemetry Support,” Filed Feb. 6, 2013, 7 pgs. |
| “IPRP”, Dated Apr. 15, 2014, Appl No. PCT/US2013/024852, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods,” Filed Feb. 6, 2013, 17 pgs. |
| “US Final Office Action”, Dated Jun. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/226,578, “Optical Casing Collar Locator Systems and Methods,” filed Sep. 7, 2011, 11 pgs. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130056202 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13226578 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Child | 13432206 | US |