The invention relates to optical devices and more particularly to devices for providing coupling between optoelectronic elements and optical fiber.
Several patent documents may be related to optical coupling between optoelectronic elements and optical media. They include U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,263 by Selli et al., issued Jul. 11, 2000, entitled “Active Device Receptacle” and owned by the assignee of the present application; U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,596 B1 by Cohen et al., issued Oct. 16, 2001, and entitled “Small Form Factor Optoelectronic Receivers”; U.S. Pat. No. 5,692,083 by Bennet, issued Nov. 25, 1997, and entitled “In-Line Unitary Optical Device Mount and Package therefore”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,536,959 B2, by Kuhn et al., issued Mar. 25, 2003, and entitled “Coupling Configuration for Connecting an Optical Fiber to an Optoelectronic Component”; which are herein incorporated by reference.
In the context of the invention, the optoelectronic element may be understood as being a transmitter or a receiver. When electrically driven, the optoelectronic element in the form of a transmitter converts the electrical signals into optical signals that are transmitted in the form of light signals. On receiving optical signals, the optoelectronic element in the form of a receiver converts these signals into corresponding electrical signals that can be tapped off at the output. In addition, an optical fiber is understood to be any apparatus for forwarding an optical signal with spatial limitation, in particular preformed optical fibers and so-called waveguides.
Fiber optic receptacle designs of the related art having sleeves use a fiber optic stub or other precision diameter devices or inserts to mechanically hold a sleeve in position. This method of mechanically mounting the sleeve prevents certain types of optical designs from being implemented.
In the related art, the standard single mode optical receptacle design may use various implementations of structure in conjunction with a fiber stub/pig-tail. However, since the stub/pig-tail is expensive and fragile and/or difficult to handle, a stub-less approach would be desirable.
The present invention may fulfill the desire for a stubless receptacle design. An instance of the invention optical coupling system may include a support structure, a holding structure attached to said support structure and an optical medium holder held by the holding structure. The holding structure may have a sheet or layer of material shaped so as to semi-enclose the optical medium holder. The sheet or layer of material may apply a pressure of contact at least partially around on the optical medium holder. There may be an optoelectronic element holder attached to the support structure. The optical medium holder and optoelectronic element holder may need a certain alignment relative to each other. The holding structure may maintain the certain alignment of the optical medium holder with the optoelectronic element holder with virtually no wiggle. The sheet of material may be a sleeve having a slit. The optical medium holder may have an outside diameter slightly larger than an inside diameter of the sleeve with the optical medium holder not in the sleeve. The inside diameter of the sleeve may be expanded against a spring-like tension to a size of the outside diameter of the optical medium holder with the optical medium holder in the sleeve. The optical medium holder may hold an optical fiber and the optoelectronic element holder may hold a light source. The light source may be a laser, and more specifically may be a vertical cavity surface emitting laser. The optical fiber may be a single mode fiber. The holding structure may maintain a certain alignment between an end of the single mode fiber and the vertical cavity surface emitting laser. In other words, the sleeve expands with flex-like resistance upon an insertion of the optical fiber ferrule and holds the ferrule in position relative to the barrel in a consistent and essentially centered position within the sleeve so as to maintain the established optical alignment of the mated elements. Instead of a light source, the optoelectronic element holder may hold a detector.
An instance of the present system may involve a split sleeve available from certain vendors. Such item may be inexpensive (less than one U.S. dollar in year 2003). In the split sleeve approach, a strip of metallization may be applied to the outside surface along a length of a zirconia split sleeve opposite of the slit. The metallization may be fired on the sleeve using one of several available metallization techniques. The sleeve may be secured at the area of metallization in position relative to metal receptacle housings or coupler barrels with standard metal-to-metal joining techniques such as solder or brazing or alternatively, a non-migrating adhesive. Many other techniques and materials may be used for assuring secure attachment of the sleeve to the housing or barrel. An advantage of the metallization technique may be that the metallization patch defines the surface area of the sleeve to be bonded so that only the desired area is attached. Moreover, since this patch area may be reasonably accurately defined and controlled by standard masking/patterning techniques, this may result in consistent mechanical joint characteristics. In contrast, a downside with using an adhesive is that some adhesives might migrate resulting in variable joint contact area or even a slight shift of the sleeve relative to the housing or the barrel to which it would be attached. This shift may degrade the alignment of the fiber of the ferrule with the laser source, photo detector, or other optoelectronic element. A true non-movement of the sleeve after attachment at the bonding path to the receptacle or barrel is important so that the zirconia split sleeve does not affect overall alignment. The split sleeve may need to flex in order to hold a fiber optic ferrule firmly in the appropriate position. With this approach, precise alignment of the ferrule held by the zirconia split sleeve in the fiber optic receptacle may be achievable. This manner for attaining a fixed location of the fiber or medium in the receptacle or barrel may prevent wiggle of the ferrule and maintain precise alignment of the ferrule with the optoelectronic element in the optical assembly.
a is a detail view disclosing further information concerning aspects of the device disclosed in
a and 3b are perspective views illustrating the split sleeve of
Split sleeve 18 is a significant part of assembly 10 as it may provide for maintaining an x and a y alignment of fiber end 19 with device 21 of element 12. It may be the structure of split sleeve 18, the manner of mounting the split sleeve 18 and the way it holds ferrule 20 which may provide a virtually wiggle-free securing of ferrule 20 for maintaining the alignment of fiber core end 19 with optoelectronic element 21 of housing or package 12. Split sleeve 18 may bias ferrule 20 to one side of the sleeve with a spring-like force on ferrule 20 to that side. Thus, if the ferrules 20 used in sleeve 18 vary somewhat in size or diameter, they may all be hold-able by sleeve 18 in a firm position or location relative to sleeve 18. This tension of holding ferrule 20 in place may prevent wiggle of ferrule 20 in the optical coupler assembly 10 so long as sleeve 18 is firmly attached to portion 22 of barrel 15. The latter may be made of a metal. The inside diameter of split sleeve 18 may be slightly smaller than the outside diameter of ferrule 20. Thus, the stretching of sleeve 18 needed to allow the insertion of ferrule 20 in sleeve 18 may result in a spring tension on ferrule 20 by split sleeve 18. During the insertion of ferrule 20 into sleeve 18, slit 25 of sleeve 18 may become wider to accommodate a slightly larger ferrule inside of sleeve 18. Split sleeve 18 may be made from a zirconia ceramic material. This material may be exceptionally hard. It also may be dimensionally stable over temperature changes. The zirconia ceramic may be springy and may be precisely machined. Ferrule 20 may be made of the same material as that of sleeve 18. Thus the coefficients of thermal expansion of sleeve 18 and ferrule 20 may be approximately the same.
a is a perspective view of sleeve 18 showing slit 25.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4317085 | Brunham et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4466694 | MacDonald | Aug 1984 | A |
4660207 | Svilans | Apr 1987 | A |
4675058 | Plaster | Jun 1987 | A |
4784722 | Liau et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4885592 | Kofol et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4901327 | Bradley | Feb 1990 | A |
4943970 | Bradley | Jul 1990 | A |
4956844 | Goodhue et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5031187 | Orenstein et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052016 | Mahbobzadeh | Sep 1991 | A |
5056098 | Anthony et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062115 | Thornton | Oct 1991 | A |
5068869 | Wang et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5079774 | Mendez et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5115442 | Lee et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117469 | Cheung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121454 | Iwanot et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5140605 | Paoli et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157537 | Rosenblatt et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158908 | Blonder et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5212706 | Jain | May 1993 | A |
5216263 | Paoli | Jun 1993 | A |
5216680 | Magnusson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231686 | Rabinovich | Jul 1993 | A |
5237581 | Asada et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245622 | Jewell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258990 | Olbright et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262360 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5285466 | Tabatabaie | Feb 1994 | A |
5293392 | Shieh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317170 | Paoli | May 1994 | A |
5317587 | Ackley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331654 | Jewell et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337074 | Thornton | Aug 1994 | A |
5337183 | Rosenblatt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349599 | Larkins | Sep 1994 | A |
5351256 | Schneider et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359447 | Hahn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359618 | Lebby et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363397 | Collins et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373520 | Shoji et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373522 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376580 | Kish et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386426 | Stephens | Jan 1995 | A |
5390209 | Vakhshoori | Feb 1995 | A |
5396508 | Bour et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404373 | Cheng | Apr 1995 | A |
5404416 | Iwano et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412678 | Treat et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412680 | Swirhum et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416044 | Chino et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428634 | Bryan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438584 | Paoli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446754 | Jewell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465263 | Bour et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475701 | Hibbs-Brenner | Dec 1995 | A |
5493577 | Choquette et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497390 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513202 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5528711 | Iwano et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530715 | Shieh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537501 | Iwano et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555255 | Kock et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557626 | Grodinski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561683 | Kwon | Oct 1996 | A |
5567980 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568498 | Nilsson | Oct 1996 | A |
5568499 | Lear | Oct 1996 | A |
5574738 | Morgan | Nov 1996 | A |
5581571 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586131 | Ono et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590145 | Nitta | Dec 1996 | A |
5598300 | Magnusson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606572 | Swirhun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5625729 | Brown | Apr 1997 | A |
5642376 | Olbright et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645462 | Banno et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646978 | Kem et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648978 | Sakata | Jul 1997 | A |
5661834 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673346 | Iwano et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679963 | Klem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692083 | Bennett | Nov 1997 | A |
5696023 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699373 | Uchida et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712188 | Chu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726805 | Kaushik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727013 | Botez et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727014 | Wang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751874 | Chudoba et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774487 | Morgan | Jun 1998 | A |
5778018 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781575 | Nilsson | Jul 1998 | A |
5784399 | Sun | Jul 1998 | A |
5790733 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796894 | Csipkes et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805624 | Yang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818066 | Duboz | Oct 1998 | A |
5828684 | Van de Walle | Oct 1998 | A |
5838705 | Shieh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838715 | Corzine et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855503 | Csipkes et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5892784 | Tan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892787 | Tan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896408 | Corzine et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901166 | Nitta et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903588 | Guenter et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903589 | Jewell | May 1999 | A |
5903590 | Hadley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908408 | McGary et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936266 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940422 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5953362 | Pamulapati et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978401 | Morgan | Nov 1999 | A |
5978408 | Thornton | Nov 1999 | A |
5995531 | Gaw et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002705 | Thornton | Dec 1999 | A |
6008675 | Handa | Dec 1999 | A |
6014395 | Jewell | Jan 2000 | A |
6043104 | Uchida et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046065 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052398 | Brillouet et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055262 | Cox et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060743 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078601 | Smith | Jun 2000 | A |
6086263 | Selli et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6133590 | Ashley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144682 | Sun | Nov 2000 | A |
6154480 | Magnusson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6185241 | Sun | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191890 | Baets et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208681 | Thorton | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212312 | Grann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238944 | Floyd | May 2001 | B1 |
6269109 | Jewell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275643 | Bandy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283644 | Gilliland et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297068 | Thornton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302596 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309113 | Naito | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339496 | Koley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6369403 | Holonyak, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372533 | Jayaraman et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6392257 | Ramdani et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411638 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427066 | Grube | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455879 | Ashley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459709 | Lo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459713 | Jewell | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6462360 | Higgins, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472694 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477285 | Shanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487230 | Boucart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487231 | Boucart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490311 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493371 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493372 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493373 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496621 | Kathman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501973 | Foley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515308 | Kneissl et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535541 | Boucart et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536959 | Kuhn et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542531 | Sirbu et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567435 | Scott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
20010004414 | Kuhn et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020150356 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154675 | Deng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172471 | Slater et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030072526 | Kathman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030169978 | Sato et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040247255 | Rosenburg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050036740 | Itabashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036745 | Nakanishi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4240706 | Jun 1994 | DE |
0288184 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0776076 | May 1997 | EP |
60123084 | Jan 1985 | JP |
02054981 | Feb 1990 | JP |
5299779 | Nov 1993 | JP |
WO 9857402 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050013553 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |