This application claims the priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119, of German application DE 10 2011 104 023.8, filed Jun. 11, 2011; the prior application is herewith incorporated by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the invention
The invention relates to an optical device for guiding radiation from an object scene to a detector containing an alignment device for pivoting the field of view of the detector relative to a predetermined direction, a detector optical unit and an optical articulation for guiding the beam path from the pivoted field of view into the detector optical unit.
Guided missiles are usually equipped with an optical target tracking device containing a homing head at the front tip of the guided missile. By virtue of the, in some instances, extremely high flying velocity for which such a guided missile has to be designed, the front tip constitutes an aerodynamically exposed position in respect of which stringent requirements are made of the design and the structural volume. These stipulations are usually at odds with requirements from missile guidance, which demand, for example, a large optical squint angle, a high optical range of target identification and target tracking and a precise outputting of the target offset.
Published, non-prosecuted German patent application DE 10 2009 029 895 A1, corresponding to U.S. patent publication No. 2010/0327105, discloses a homing head of a guided missile, wherein a prism arrangement forms an optical articulation. When the field of view of the detector of the homing head is pivoted, the prism right at the front of this arrangement together with an input optical unit is concomitantly pivoted with the field of view, whereas the subsequent prisms are stationary in a structurally fixed manner or are concomitantly moved with a rolling frame. This optical articulation is relatively voluminous, however, as a result of the prism construction.
Published, non-prosecuted German patent application DE 10 2008 026 990 A1 discloses an optical articulation which dispenses with the voluminous prisms and achieves a squint angle of 90 to −90 degrees by use of mirrors. However, this arrangement, too, has a relatively large structural size.
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide an optical device for guiding radiation from an object scene to a detector and a method for guiding radiation from the object scene to the detector which overcome the above-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art methods and devices of this general type, which specifies an optical system having a large optical squint angle, which optical system can be embodied particularly compactly.
The object is achieved by an optical device of the type mentioned in the introduction, wherein the optical articulation has, according to the invention, a reversing prism, in which beams running in the optical axis of the articulation are refracted towards a reflection surface of the reversing prism and are reflected by the reflection surface.
With a reversing prism, the optical properties of a mirror and of a prism can be combined with one another. It makes it possible for a beam arriving from the front to be passed on optically towards the rear, which would not be possible with a simple mirror, and it makes it possible to realize a squint angle or pivoting of the field of view of ±90 degrees or more. A serial arrangement of a plurality of mirrors or prisms is not necessary, for which reason a very compact design of the optical articulation can be achieved.
The optical device can be part of a camera for imaging the object scene onto the detector. In this respect, the optical device can be a pivoting attachment for a camera lens. The field of view can be the input-related field of view of the detector, that is to say that visual range with which the detector “looks” into the object scene or which is imaged onto the detector.
The optical device can also contain an active device for emitting radiation which is directed to a specific position of the object scene by the pivoting of the field of view or of the optical articulation. If appropriate, a detector can be dispensed with. If a detector is absent, the field of view can relate to the emission field of a radiation source, wherein the detector optical unit can be a beam shaping optical unit. The detector can therefore be replaced or supplemented by a radiation source. The radiation source can be a laser source, such that the optical device serves as a laser aligning device.
The optical device can contain an input optical unit, which contains the first optical element on which radiation coming from the object scene impinges. The alignment device can be a mechanical device for pivoting an optical component, such that the field of view is pivoted, for example a device for pivoting the input optical unit, such that the latter can be directed onto an object of the object scene. The pivoting can be effected—very generally—relative to the detector or—even more generally—relative to a positionally fixed element, that is to say an element that is connected for example rigidly to a housing of the optical device, for example a missile outer shell.
The pivoting of the field of view is effected in a relative fashion, that is to say with respect to a predetermined direction. The latter can be a rolling axis, e.g. of the optical device, of a homing head or of a guided missile, an axis of symmetry or some other direction determined in advance. The pivoting of the field of view can be effected with the aid of a rolling-pitching device by which the field of view, with or without an input optical unit, can be pivoted about a pitch axis within a pivoting angle range, for example +/−90 degrees. In addition, it is advantageous if the field of view, and/or an input optical unit, can be rotated about a rolling axis that is expediently an axis of symmetry of the optical device. In the case of a guided missile or a homing head therefor, the rolling axis is expediently the rolling axis of the guided missile. Advantageously, the rolling axis and the pitch axis intersect at the center of a partly spherical entrance window of the device, for example of a dome of a homing head, at right angles.
As detector, an image sensor is advantageously for example a multi-element matrix detector. It is preferably arranged centrally and with its reception plane at least virtually at right angles with respect to the rolling axis. The detector optical unit is installed upstream of the detector. The detector and the detector optical unit are preferably mounted in a structurally fixed manner or in a manner fixed to the housing. However, it is also possible to mount the detector optical unit and, in particular, also the detector in rolling fashion, that is to say in a manner movable about the rolling axis with respect to a housing, for example in a rolling frame. The field of view can preferably be directed at all points of a half-space, for example the front half-space of a missile. For this purpose, it is preferably pivotable by +/−90 degrees about a pitch axis and preferably rotatable by 360° about a rolling axis, wherein rolling about a rolling axis given the presence of pitching pivoting can also be designated as pivoting. The field of view of the detector is expediently between ±2 degrees and ±10 degrees about a central direction.
The optical articulation contains one reversing prism, although a plurality of reversing prisms, in particular two reversing prisms, are also advantageous, which are expediently stacked one on top of another. In this case, the reflection surfaces are expediently arranged parallel to one another. Advantageously, all the optical properties of the optical articulation are achieved just by the at least one reversing prism, such that additional components can be dispensed with. Furthermore, it is advantageous if the reversing prisms of the optical articulation are arranged rigidly with respect to one another, such that the optical pivoting properties occur as a result of the prisms which are rigid with respect to one another. In this way, the mechanics of the optical articulation can be kept simple. The optical axis of the optical articulation can be parallel to the central axis of the beam bundle incident from the field of view or aligned by the articulation.
The reversing prism is a prism having at least one reflection surface at which the beam path is at least partly specularly reflected. It is preferably a single prism having an entrance surface, at least one reflection surface different from the latter, and expediently having an exit surface different from the two first-mentioned surfaces. A roof edge prism is particularly suitable, in particular a dove prism. The reversing prism is expediently arranged in the optical device such that the beam path is specularly reflected only once at only one reflection surface. The mirror surface is preferably a hypotenuse surface of the prism; it is expediently reflectively coated, but the reflective coating is not necessary. It is particularly advantageous if the ridge line of the reversing prism runs parallel to the pitch axis. It is additionally beneficial for compactness if the pivoting axis or the pitch axis runs parallel to the hypotenuse surface, in particular lies in the hypotenuse surface.
In the reversing prism, a parallel beam bundle incident in a front roof surface is expediently refracted towards the hypotenuse surface, reflected there and refracted again at the rear roof surface and thus output as a mirrored beam bundle. Expediently, the other optical beam properties remain unchanged. In this way, the rear beam bundles thus obtained can be introduced into a customary detector optical unit without further optical measures. If the reversing prism is pivoted by rotation of the pivoting axis or pitch axis perpendicular to the rolling axis, then, from the point of view of the detector, the beam bundles at the input of the prisms are rotated by twice the angle on account of the mirroring in the prism. A mechanical prism tilting by 45 degrees thus generates the required or advantageous optical squint angle tilting by 90 degrees.
The material of the reversing prism is dependent on the radiation frequency used. Expediently, the detector is an infrared detector and the material of the reversing prism is a material transparent to infrared radiation, in particular silicon. The form of the reversing prism, in particular the angle of two roof surfaces and a hypotenuse surface of the reversing prism with respect to one another, can be made dependent on the refractive index and thus on the radiation frequency and the material. In particular, the diameter of the field of view is taken into account in the choice of geometry of the prism, since a large field of view is associated with a large beam divergence, including in the prism. Thus, advantageously, all beams incident in the reversing prism—including at different angles of incidence in accordance with the extent of the field of view—should be led out from the reversing prism again in the direction of the detector objective.
One advantageous embodiment of the invention provides for the reversing prism to have a hypotenuse surface aligned parallel to the optical axis. In this case, the alignment of the optical axis can relate to the beam path upstream of the reversing prism, that is to say between the object scene and the reversing prism. The parallelism expediently occurs with the field of view not having been pivoted. In this way, it is possible—using the hypotenuse surface as a mirror surface—for a beam entering into the reversing prism from the front to be led out from the reversing prism in the same direction towards the rear, thereby enabling a deflection—unchanged in the beam direction—of the beam from the reversing prism, in association with an image mirroring which, however, is of no significance for the beam direction.
A pivoting of the field of view by ±90 degrees can be made possible in a particularly simple manner if the optical articulation has two reversing prisms which act identically in the beam path and which are expediently arranged alongside one another, one above the other or generally: adjacent, in the beam path. Radiation from the object scene can simultaneously be directed onto the two reversing prisms, which are advantageously arranged in parallel fashion in the sense of not serially. The two prisms can be arranged in a plurality of ways with respect to one another, and can expediently be stacked one on top of another. However, if the two reversing prisms adjoin one another at their hypotenuse surfaces, then it is possible to create a particularly compact optical articulation with a high radiation efficiency. A particularly compact arrangement can be achieved if the two reversing prisms lie with their reflection surfaces one on top of the other. In this case, they can form an optical cube.
Furthermore, it is advantageous if both reversing prisms—in conjunction with the detector optical unit—in each case image an overall image of the object scene onto the detector. These overall images lie one above another, such that a point on the object scene is imaged by both reversing prisms onto the same point at the detector.
A further advantageous embodiment of the invention provides for the pivoting axis of the pivoting of the field of view to run through a center of symmetry of the optical articulation. The center of symmetry can be a geometrical midpoint, a geometrical center of a mirror plane, a center of gravity, a midpoint of a line of intersection of two planes of symmetry or the like. By virtue of this arrangement, the optical articulation can be kept particularly compact.
The number of reversing prisms used for the optical articulation is arbitrary, in principle. Thus, it is also possible to use more than two deflection prisms which are arranged in the beam path one above another, that is to say in parallel fashion in the sense of not serially. Expediently, each of the reversing prisms images the entire field of view on the detector. Possible shadings do not impair such an operative principle. The deflection prisms can be stacked one on top of another. For this purpose, they are expediently equipped with a surface embodied parallel to the hypotenuse surface, such that the parallel planes of the reversing prisms can be placed onto one another. The use of microprisms is also advantageous, the dimensioning of which is expediently less than 1 mm perpendicular to the hypotenuse surface.
In principle, the advantage of a large entrance aperture of the device is at odds with the desire for a compact design. Nevertheless, in order to achieve an entrance aperture of the device which is larger than the entrance aperture of the optical articulation, it is advantageous to provide an input optical unit upstream of the optical articulation. The input optical unit is expediently embodied such that it compacts the beam path incident from the object scene, with the result that the beam path passing through the entrance aperture of the input optical unit is therefore compacted in the exit aperture, and the exit aperture is, for example, smaller than the entrance aperture. As a result, the compacted beam path can be directed directly onto the optical articulation, which can be kept small as a result. In this way, a large entrance aperture of the optical device can be combined with a compact design of the optical articulation.
The compaction of the input optical unit is expediently effected by a factor of 1.2 to 10, in particular. The factor expediently relates to the diameter ratio of the entrance aperture to the exit aperture of the input optical unit. Expediently, the input optical unit is the first optical means of the device into which the beam path coming from the object scene in an unchanged manner impinges first, if appropriate apart from an entrance window, for example a homing head dome.
An input optical unit upstream of the optical articulation, that is to say between the optical articulation and the object scene, is expediently afocal, such that a parallel beam incidence from the object scene is directed onto the optical articulation in parallel fashion. As a result, image aberrations caused by the pivoting can be kept small or even avoided.
Furthermore, it is proposed that the input optical unit compensates for optical properties of an entrance window that effects mechanical shielding from the surroundings, for example of a homing head dome. The compensation expediently takes place such that an afocal nature with respect to the optical articulation is maintained. Within the meaning of such an afocal input optical unit, the entrance window can also be understood as part of the input optical unit.
In order to avoid image disturbances caused by a pivoting, it is furthermore advantageous if the optical articulation is afocal. This can make it possible for the beam path to be parallel both upstream and downstream of the optical articulation.
The optical articulation tracks a beam path to a pivoting of the field of view such that the field of view remains imaged onto the detector. The size of the imaging, for example a planar image or else just a point, is unimportant in this case. For the purpose of optical tracking, the optical articulation is expediently provided with a rotation device for rotating at least one part of the optical articulation, in particular the entire optical articulation. Advantageously, the latter is embodied such that the optical articulation is concomitantly pivoted with always half the pivoting angle of the field of view. In this case, all optical elements of the optical articulation are expediently rotated synchronously. The axis of rotation of the rotating process is expediently the pivoting axis during the pivoting of the field of view. The rotation device can be a rotation drive. However, it already suffices if it has a bearing that serves for rotating the articulation.
The alignment device and the rotation device can be moved in a manner driven separately from one another, a synchronization of the movement being expedient for the positional constancy of the imaging of the field of view onto the detector. A particularly simple synchronization can be achieved if the alignment device and the rotation device are mechanically forcibly coupled. Such a forcible coupling can be effected by a gear mechanism for example.
Mechanical loads during such a forcible coupling can be kept small if a force flux for rotating the articulation is led via the alignment device into the rotation device. Since the alignment device rotates with twice the angle with respect to the rotation device, the rotation is thereby stepped down, which is mechanically protective.
Furthermore, it is advantageous if an input optical unit and the optical articulation are in each case mounted independently of one another in terms of their movement for the pivoting of the field of view. The mounting can be effected in a rolling frame, such that both elements are rollable.
The invention is additionally directed to an optical device for guiding radiation from an object scene to a detector comprising an alignment device for pivoting the field of view of the detector relative to a predetermined direction and an optical articulation for guiding the beam path from the pivoted field of view to the detector, e.g. into a detector optical unit. It is proposed that the device has, according to the invention, a shielding which is led around the optical articulation and which shields the optical articulation against incident radiation that is not incident through the entrance or exit aperture of the optical articulation. Expediently, the shielding shields against all externally incident radiation that is not incident through the entrance or exit aperture. It goes without saying that the shielding does not have to relate to the radiation emitted by the shielding itself, in particular infrared radiation, but rather only to externally incident radiation, in particular from outside the shielding. Disturbing stray light can thus be reduced or even completely avoided. This is particularly advantageous since an optical articulation embodied with a deflection prism has particularly large entrance surfaces into which spurious radiation can penetrate and pass to the detector without a shielding.
It goes without saying that this invention directed to the shielding can also be combined with the abovementioned invention of the reversing prism for the optical articulation and with all details described with this invention.
In order to be able to adapt well to a movement of the optical articulation in the case of a pivoting, it is advantageous if the shielding has at least one shielding element that is variable in terms of the surface area. Such a shielding element can be, for example, bellows or an elastic element or some other suitable element which can be enlarged and reduced in size. The surface variation relates to the shielding surface.
One particularly advantageous further development provides for a mechanical coupling to an input optical unit to be present, which brings about a surface variation coupled to a pivoting of the field of view. A dedicated drive for surface variation can be dispensed with in this way.
The shielding is movable with particularly low friction and thus rapidly and with low expenditure of force if it has at least one unwinding system and the shielding element can be unwound. The shielding element is expediently wound up on the unwinding device and can be at least partly unwound during the operation of the optical device, in particular in accordance with a surface variation or a pivoting of the field of view.
It is additionally proposed that the shielding element is mechanically forcibly coupled with a movement of an input optical unit in terms of its movement. In this case, expediently a force flux for the movement is led via an element that acts on the input optical unit. In this way, the input optical unit or the element acting thereon can bring about the movement of the shielding element and, in particular its surface variation. A force flux can run from a housing via the element to the shielding element.
As a result of the use of a reversing prism, an image rotation takes place on the detector when the field of view is pivoted. It goes without saying that it is possible and advantageous to correct this image rotation with an optical element. However, a particularly compact solution consists in providing a process device which is prepared for determining an image displacement, that is to say image rotation or the like—designated in a generalized manner as image shift. On the basis of the data determined, the image shift can be corrected or calculated back using image processing device. The determination is expediently effected with the image clock timing. The image shift can be caused by the pivoting of the field of view and/or an entrance window alignment with respect to the object scene, that is to say for example by a change in the flight direction of a guided missile. Expediently, the process device makes image correction data available to an image processing. The image shift can thereby be corrected or eliminated computationally.
A parallel beam path can be produced between the optical articulation and the detector optical unit in a particularly simple manner. Such a location is particularly suitable for accommodating a functional module for the damping influencing of the beam path, for the spectral optical influencing of the beam path and/or for coupling radiation into or out of the beam path. Other influencings are also possible. The functional module can be a passive or active module that only receives or only or also emits radiation, such as a laser beam. The parallelism relates to beams incident in the entrance aperture of the optical device in parallel fashion. Owing to a planar field of view, not only parallel beams are present, of course, but this non-parallelism is not at odds with the term parallel beam path as used here.
The invention is additionally directed to a homing head for a guided missile containing an optical device as described above. Expediently, the homing head contains a partly spherical entrance window in the form of a dome having a sphere center. The homing head can be embodied particularly compactly or with high luminous intensity if the pivoting axis of the pivoting of the field of view runs through the sphere center. In particular, the center of symmetry of the optical articulation is also arranged in the sphere center.
The invention is additionally directed to a guided missile containing a homing head as described above.
Furthermore, the invention is directed to a method for guiding radiation from an object scene to a detector or from a radiation source in the direction of an object scene. For the purpose of simplification, mention is made hereinafter only of guiding the radiation to the detector, but the embodiment of the active emission by the optical articulation into the object scene is intended to be included here. In the method, a field of view of the detector is pivoted relative to a predetermined direction and radiation is guided from the region of the field of view from the object scene through an optical articulation and a detector optical unit to the detector.
It is proposed that the optical articulation has, according to the invention, a reversing prism, which, in the case where the field of view is pivoted by a pivoting angle, is concomitantly pivoted by half of the pivoting angle. In this way, the mode of action of a mirror can be used and radiation incident from the front can be passed on 180 degrees towards the rear. The object scene can thereby be scanned or illuminated particularly compactly.
Further advantages will become apparent from the following description of the drawing. Exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawing. The invention is not restricted to these exemplary embodiments—including with regard to functional features—nor should the exemplary embodiments be considered as separate from one another. Thus, features of any exemplary embodiment that are suitable in any way for this can also be considered explicitly in isolation, removed from one exemplary embodiment and/or introduced into another exemplary embodiment in order to supplement the latter.
Other features which are considered as characteristic for the invention are set forth in the appended claims.
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodied in an optical device for guiding radiation from an object scene to a detector, it is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.
The construction and method of operation of the invention, however, together with additional objects and advantages thereof will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the figures of the drawing in detail and first, particularly, to
A schematic sectional drawing in a plan view of the homing head 4 is illustrated in
The optical articulation 10 contains two reversing prisms 44, 46, which are placed onto one another in each case at their hypotenuse surface. The two reversing prisms 44, 46 together form an optical cube, which likewise can be pivoted about the pitch axis 40 and can be rotated about the rolling axis 42.
The detector optical unit 10 illustrated schematically by a lens 48 is arranged between the optical articulation 10 and the detector 14, and images the excerpt from the field of view 30 of the object scene 18 onto the detector 14. The detector 14 is an infrared detector that is sensitive in the medium infrared. However, any other spectral sensitivities are also possible and advantageous. A cooler 50 is present for cooling the detector 14, the cooler window 52 of the cooler being arranged between the detector optical unit 12 and the detector 14. An inertial measurement unit 54 and the control unit 16, which are in each case only indicated schematically are arranged in the rear region of the homing head 4.
The detector 14 is embodied as an image sensor in the form of a matrix detector having a multiplicity of detector elements arranged in matrix form, the surface center of which lies on the rolling axis 42 and thus at any pitching angle always on the optical axis, that is to say in the center of the field of view 30.
The optical elements and beam path are now described.
With reference to the sectional view from
The entrance aperture of the input optical unit 8 pivotable about the pitch axis 40 and rolling axis 42 is determined by the opening of the entrance lens 36 but also by the shading of the dome edge at large squint angles, as is illustrated in
The input optical unit 8 is embodied as a thermally stable afocal unit, that is to say that it is an afocal optical unit. A parallel beam path, illustrated by solid lines in
The beam bundle is deflected by the prism block arranged symmetrically in the dome center and rotatably about the pitch axis 40 and rolling axis 42, the prism block forming the optical articulation 10 with regard to the optical elements. Its two identical and isosceles reversing prisms, dove prisms in this exemplary embodiment, are placed onto one another congruently in each case at their hypotenuse surface 56. The transverse axes of the hypotenuse surface 56 thus lie on the pitch axis 40 and the surface center of the hypotenuse surface 56 lies in the dome center, in which the pitch axis 40 and the rolling axis 42 also intersect. The center of symmetry of the optical articulation 10 lies in the pivoting axis or pitch axis 40.
Incident beams are refracted at the entrance surface 58 of the two reversing prisms 44, 46 towards the hypotenuse surface 56 and reflected there to the exit surface 60, in which the beams leave the reversing prism 44 and respectively 48 again. In this case, the hypotenuse surfaces 56 of the prisms 44, 46 can be reflectively coated in order to increase a reflection proportion. The reflective coating can be advantageous for use in specific spectra. With the field of view not having been pivoted, the hypotenuse surfaces 56 are aligned parallel to the optical axis of the beam path upstream of the optical device 6 and parallel to the optical axis of the beam path upstream of the optical articulation 10.
On account of the known optical operative function of a dove prism, the beam bundle is directed from the input optical unit 8 via both reversing prisms 44, 46 exactly with twice the angle with respect to the incident beam direction about the pitch axis 40 and in a direction longitudinally with respect to the rolling axis 42. In this case, the incident pupil bundle falls onto both prisms 44, 46 and is thereby split, mirrored and output in an optically offset fashion. The imaging optical properties are maintained in both resulting beam bundles, however, such that two congruent imagings of the field of view scenario are ultimately generated on the detector 14. If the field of view 30 is aligned parallel to the rolling axis 42 and thus to the axis of symmetry of the optical device 6, then the incident pupil bundle is split between the two reversing prisms 44, 46 exactly half each. This is represented in
The two reversing prisms 44, 46 are formed from silicon and are thus distinguished by a refractive index that is very favorable in the infrared, and by thermal stability. What is furthermore advantageous is the low weight, which is advantageous for application in missiles.
The detector optical unit 12 is an imaging optical unit which could also be used without the input optical unit 8 and the optical articulation 10 for the imaging of the object scene 18. In this respect, the three optical units input optical unit 8, optical articulation 10 and detector optical unit 12 can be used independently of one another. They are also thermally passivated independently of one another.
The mechanical construction of the guided missle is now described.
The angle doubling of the optical articulation 10 requires that the prism block may only ever be rotated by half the pitching angle relative to the entrance optical unit 8—proceeding from the zero position of the frame system parallel to the rolling axis 42, that is to say in the case of a squint angle of 0°, up to the maximum pitching deflection. For this purpose, the input optical unit 8 is mounted rotatably in a mechanically separated fashion relative to the optical articulation 10 on the pitch axis 40. In this case, a 2:1 coupling of the angles of rotation can be effected by means of a separate rotational driving of the two elements. In the exemplary embodiments shown, however, the mechanical coupling is effected by a gear mechanism 62, in particular a gearwheel mechanism (see
In this exemplary embodiment, the pitch movement drive both of the input optical unit 8 and of the optical articulation 10 is effected by an electromagnetic direct drive 72, which is supported on the rolling frame 70. The drive 72 is illustrated opposite the gear mechanism 62 in
The drive 72 can be regarded as an alignment device for the pivoting of the field of view 18. The mounting of the supporting structure about the pitch axis 42 can also be understood as the alignment device.
The rolling frame 70 is mounted rotatably about the rolling axis 42 with respect to a housing structure 78, which is connected fixedly and rigidly to the outer shell 34 of the homing head 4 or of the guided missile 2. In this case, the rolling drive is effected by a direct drive 80 between the rolling frame 70 and the housing structure 78. Since the input optical unit 8 and the optical articulation 10 are mounted in the rolling frame 70, they are also rotatable about the rolling axis 42.
The rolling frame 70 or the structure plate thereof is illustrated perspectively in
By virtue of the open prism structure of the optical articulation, the optical articulation 10 and also the entrance lens 48 of the detector optical unit 12 are protected only inadequately against external radiation and internal stray radiation. Therefore the optical device 6 is shielded by a shielding 84, led around the optical articulation 10, against external radiation and internal stray radiation.
The shielding 84 contains a shielding element 86 in the form of a metal film. In the exemplary embodiment shown, this metallic and flexible shielding strip is illustrated in a partly sectional fashion in
The shielding element 86 is wound up in the case of integral embodiment around the optical articulation 10 on both sides or in the case of bipartite embodiment on at least one side on rolls 88 or a roll 88 and is rolled up or unrolled in the case of a pitching movement of the input optical unit 8. As a result, a movement of the shielding element 86 which is displacement-free with respect to the pitching movement can be achieved, as a result of which the shielding element is always carried along with the pitching movement with low forces and low wear. The roll 88 or both rolls 88 is or are coupled by a mechanical coupling with a pitching movement, such that they are automatically concomitantly wound up or unwound in the case of a pitching movement. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated, the mechanical coupling is effected by a gearwheel coupling 90, which can be seen in
As a result of the rolling-up or unrolling, the shielding element 86 is an element that is variable in terms of surface area, a mechanical coupling to the input optical unit 8 bringing about a surface variation of the shielding surface that is coupled to a pivoting about the pitch axis. In this case, the shielding element 86 is mechanically forcibly coupled in terms of its movement with the movement of the input optical unit 8, a force flux for the movement of the shielding element being led via the input optical unit 8 or an element 92 acting thereon. As a result of the shielding 84, the optical articulation 10 is shielded against all incident radiation that is not incident through the entrance or exit aperture of the optical articulation 10.
As mentioned, the optical device 4 is characterized by three units 8, 10, 12 that are substantially independent of one another. In this respect, the distances between the units 8, 10, 12 in the longitudinal axis or rolling axis 42, or the axis of symmetry of the optical device 4 can be varied in terms of their distances with respect to one another. As a result of the parallel beam path, the optical mode of action of the elements 8, 10, 12 with respect to one another is not influenced in this case, but the beam divergence, caused by the extent of the field of view 30 should be taken into consideration. In this respect, the optical device 4 is particularly suitable for accommodating one or a plurality of functional modules which can be arranged between the individual elements 8, 10, 12.
One such arrangement example is outlined schematically in
In the parallel beam path between the elements 8 and 10 and in particular between the elements 10 and 12 it is possible, with relatively little structural outlay, to input and output optical signals containing distance information, identification information or measurement information, for example in the optically active field of view 30. As a result of the parallelism of the beam path, therefore, a functional module 94 can be integrated there in a particularly simple manner and with minor requirements made of the functional module 94 and the adaptation of the optical device to the functional module 94.
A functional module 94 increases the structural length of the optical device 4 by at least the structural length of the functional module 94 and, on account of the extension of the field of view, at least as a further consequence the entrance aperture of the detector optical unit 12 has to be adapted, that is to say expanded.
The image processing is now described.
With the aid of the optical device 4, it is possible to image the excerpt of the field of view 30 from the object scene 18 onto the detector 14. If image comparisons over one or a plurality of successive images are to be carried out, unambiguous position information must be present with respect to each image. Falsifying effects arising from the embodiment as a result of the dove prisms in the prism block should be taken into account for this purpose. The effect of the doubled pitch angle is at least in part already mechanically compensated for by the gear mechanism coupling of the gear mechanism 62 between the input optical unit 8 and the prism block of the optical articulation 10. The compensation of the doubling of the image rotation in the reversing prism is significantly more complex. For this purpose, the control unit 16 is equipped with a specific computation module, in which all relevant image data, for example measured or calculated with respect to the last image position, can be converted to the image shift effected in the meantime and in particular to the effected image rotation of the next image. This is possible on the basis of the measured differences of roll and pitch angles and the inertial measurement angle difference detected by the inertial measurement unit 54.
Such an image compensation can proceed, for example, by the detection of a rotational movement—effected from a first to a second point in time—of the prism block or optical articulation 10 about its longitudinal axis or pitch axis 40. The relevant image data, for example of the last image, are then converted with twice the rotation angle into the new rotation position. A rotation of the rolling frame 70 that is possibly effected can be added with a corresponding sign. The rotation-compensated image thus generated can then be shifted on the basis of the measured angle differences—caused by a flight movement of the guided missile about pitch and yaw axes—correspondingly to form the compensated image. The compensated image can firstly form the basis for image comparisons and secondly be used for compensation calculation with respect to the following image.
In order to enable image comparisons in the image processing, it is necessary to determine the optical double rotation of the reversing prisms using the instantaneous pitch angle and, in particular, also the instantaneous rolling angle by a specific computation module with respect to each image. It is also possible to include the inertial movement data of the guided missile 2 in the image correction. Thus, features from temporally successive images, even in the case of a mechanically moved structure, are then comparable in the image processing.
The process device 16 is prepared for determining, with the image clock timing, an image displacement on the detector 14, which is brought about by the pivoting of the field of view and/or by a pivoting of an entrance window alignment with respect to the object scene 18 and for making available image correction data to an image processing. The image displacement can be defined with respect to a defined reference, e.g. with respect to a non-pivoted position of the field of view.
In the exemplary embodiment from
As shown in
As shown by the exemplary embodiments, the form of the roof edge prism used is diversely variable. A flattened roof form, as shown in
In the examples from
In the case where a plurality of reversing prisms are used, they also need not be of the same size. The combination of a larger with a smaller reversing prism is entirely possible and advantageous.
The modes of action of the optical articulations 96-104 are identical to the above-described mode of action of the optical articulation 10, if appropriate more than two images of the object scene 18 being generated. It is particularly advantageous if the deflection prisms 106-114 are jointly pivoted about the pitch axis 40 and that they are afocal in order to avoid image disturbances during pivoting.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 104 023 | Jun 2011 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2593904 | Ludewig | Apr 1952 | A |
3994557 | Hopkins | Nov 1976 | A |
4087061 | Burt | May 1978 | A |
4404592 | Pepin et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4773754 | Eisele | Sep 1988 | A |
4984892 | Hofmann | Jan 1991 | A |
5512741 | Levaillant et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5592331 | Eastcott | Jan 1997 | A |
8466407 | Martin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20090027750 | Kempas | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040634 | Baumann | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100327105 | Eckhardt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110043904 | Lücke et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
15278 | Oct 1962 | DE |
80814 | Nov 1975 | DE |
3805642 | Jun 1989 | DE |
10135222 | Feb 2003 | DE |
102007035574 | Feb 2009 | DE |
10 2008 026 990 | Dec 2009 | DE |
10 2009 029 895 | Jan 2011 | DE |
102009037921 | Mar 2011 | DE |
1203978 | May 2002 | EP |
1201402 | Dec 1959 | FR |
2690997 | Nov 1993 | FR |
769444 | Mar 1957 | GB |
2005114987 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120312968 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |