The disclosure pertains to beam shaping in optical fibers.
The use of high-power fiber-coupled lasers continues to gain popularity for a variety of applications, such as materials processing, cutting, welding, and/or additive manufacturing. These lasers include, for example, fiber lasers, disk lasers, diode lasers, diode-pumped solid state lasers, and lamp-pumped solid state lasers. In these systems, optical power is delivered from the laser to a work piece via an optical fiber.
Various fiber-coupled laser materials processing tasks require different beam characteristics (e.g., spatial profiles and/or divergence profiles). For example, cutting thick metal and welding generally require a larger spot size than cutting thin metal. Ideally, the laser beam properties would be adjustable to enable optimized processing for these different tasks. Conventionally, users have two choices: (1) Employ a laser system with fixed beam characteristics that can be used for different tasks but is not optimal for most of them (i.e., a compromise between performance and flexibility); or (2) Purchase a laser system or accessories that offer variable beam characteristics but that add significant cost, size, weight, complexity, and perhaps performance degradation (e.g., optical loss) or reliability degradation (e.g., reduced robustness or up-time). Currently available laser systems capable of varying beam characteristics require the use of free-space optics or other complex and expensive add-on mechanisms (e.g., zoom lenses, mirrors, translatable or motorized lenses, combiners, etc.) in order to vary beam characteristics. No solution exists that provides the desired adjustability in beam characteristics that minimizes or eliminates reliance on the use of free-space optics or other extra components that add significant penalties in terms of cost, complexity, performance, and/or reliability. What is needed is an in-fiber apparatus for providing varying beam characteristics that does not require or minimizes the use of free-space optics and that can avoid significant cost, complexity, performance tradeoffs, and/or reliability degradation.
Apparatus comprise a first fiber situated to receive an input optical beam, the first fiber having a first refractive index profile. A fiber shaping surface is situated so that a section of at least the first fiber is urged to conform a fiber shaping surface. A bend controller is situated to select a length of the section of the first fiber urged to conform to the fiber shaping surface or to select a curvature of the fiber shaping surface to perturb the input optical beam and produce a modified optical beam. A second fiber is coupled to the first fiber and situated to receive the modified optical beam, the second fiber having a second refractive index profile selected to maintain at least one beam characteristic of the modified optical beam. In some examples, the fiber shaping surface is a major surface of a flexible plate, and the flexible plate includes an ionic-polymer composite. In other alternatives, a piezo-bending actuator is used that can include one or more piezoelectric plates bonded together. Typically, a first electrode and a second electrode are situated so that at least a portion of the ionic polymer is situated between the first electrode and the second electrode. In some examples, the first electrode and the second electrode are conductive layers that substantially cover the first major surface and the second major surface, and the bend controller is an electrical voltage source. In further examples, a second set of electrodes is situated about the ionic polymer and a sensor is coupled to the second set of electrodes to detect deformation of the flexible plate. The bend controller is coupled to the sensor and establishes a voltage applied to the ionic polymer based on a voltage detected by the second set of electrodes.
According to some examples, the first fiber is situated to as to extend along a direction of the curvature of the fiber shaping surface. In other examples, the first fiber comprises one or more elongated loops and the section of the fiber conforming to the fiber shaping surface includes elongated portions of the loops situated to extend in the direction of the curvature of the fiber shaping surface. In other embodiments, a displacement member is coupled to the flexible plate to vary the curvature of the fiber shaping surface by pushing against the flexible plate or pulling the flexible plate. In typical examples, the flexible plate is secured at two locations and the displacement member is coupled to the flexible plate between the two locations. In representative embodiments, the flexible plate is secured at respective ends along a direction of the curvature of the fiber shaping surface. According to some examples, the fiber shaping surface has a fixed curvature, and is a surface of a ring, a surface of a section of a ring, or an outer surface of a cylinder such as a right circular cylinder.
In some examples, the bend controller is situated to vary the length of the section of the first fiber that conforms to the fiber shaping surface. In additional examples, a guide is slidably secured with respect to the flexible surface and situated to engage the fiber so that the length of the section of the first fiber that is urged to conform to the fiber shaping surface is variable in response to movement of the guide along the fiber shaping surface. In some examples, the guide includes a groove that engages the first fiber. In still further embodiments, a connecting member is rotatably secured at an axis of rotation and secured to the guide so that rotation of the guide about the axis urges the guide along the fiber shaping surface. According to additional examples, the fiber shaping surface has a compound curvature that includes a plurality of circular curvatures, and the axis of rotation corresponds to a center of curvature of one of the plurality of the circular curvatures.
According to some examples, the fiber shaping surface is defined by a portion of a mandrel surface and the bend controller comprises a jaw situated to urge the first length of fiber toward the portion of the mandrel surface and the first fiber forms at least a portion of a loop situated about the mandrel. In some cases, the bend controller includes a stage situated to urge the mandrel towards the first length of fiber. In additional examples, the first fiber and the second fiber form at least the portion of the loop. A splice couples the first fiber and the second fiber and the jaw is situated to urge the first length of fiber, a portion of the second fiber, and the splice toward the portion of the mandrel surface. In still further examples, the jaw comprises a first jaw and a second jaw oppositely situated with respect to a displacement axis of the stage. The first jaw and the second jaw are coupled to a first elastic member and a second elastic member each situated to urge a respective jaw surface toward the mandrel surface. In other examples, the bend controller is configured to urge the mandrel toward the first jaw surface and the second jaw surface so as to select the section of the first fiber that is urged to conform to the fiber shaping surface, a section of the second fiber that is urged to conform to the fiber shaping surface, and a curvature of at least a portion of the loop that does not contact either the fiber bending surface, the first, jaw, or the second jaw.
In some examples, fiber sections are secured at one or two end points, or formed in curved, looped, or straight sections, and one or more surfaces such as surfaces of pins, rods, or spheres contact the fiber sections, and a fiber is bent in response. In some examples, the fiber sections are urged toward such a surface, or the surface is urged toward the fiber section, or both are movable toward each other.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed technology will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like elements, are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification and, together with the description, explain the advantages and principles of the presently disclosed technology. In the drawings,
As used herein throughout this disclosure and in the claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Additionally, the term “includes” means “comprises.” Further, the term “coupled” does not exclude the presence of intermediate elements between the coupled items. Also, the terms “modify” and “adjust” are used interchangeably to mean “alter.”
The systems, apparatus, and methods described herein should not be construed as limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and non-obvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combinations thereof, nor do the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved. Any theories of operation are to facilitate explanation, but the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus are not limited to such theories of operation.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed methods are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth below. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed systems, methods, and apparatus can be used in conjunction with other systems, methods, and apparatus. Additionally, the description sometimes uses terms like “produce” and “provide” to describe the disclosed methods. These terms are high-level abstractions of the actual operations that are performed. The actual operations that correspond to these terms will vary depending on the particular implementation and are readily discernible by one of ordinary skill in the art.
In some examples, values, procedures, or apparatus are referred to as “lowest”, “best”, “minimum,” or the like. It will be appreciated that such descriptions are intended to indicate that a selection among many used functional alternatives can be made, and such selections need not be better, smaller, or otherwise preferable to other selections. Examples are described with reference to directions indicated as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” and the like. These terms are used for convenient description, but do not imply any particular spatial orientation.
Definitions of words and terms as used herein:
Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and apparatus configured to provide a fiber operable to provide a laser beam having variable beam characteristics (VBC) that may reduce cost, complexity, optical loss, or other drawbacks of the conventional methods described above. This VBC fiber is configured to vary a wide variety of optical beam characteristics. Such beam characteristics can be controlled using the VBC fiber thus allowing users to tune various beam characteristics to suit the particular requirements of an extensive variety of laser processing applications. For example, a VBC fiber may be used to tune: beam diameter, beam divergence distribution, BPP, intensity distribution, M2 factor, NA, optical intensity, power density, radial beam position, radiance, spot size, or the like, or any combination thereof.
In general, the disclosed technology entails coupling a laser beam into a fiber in which the characteristics of the laser beam in the fiber can be adjusted by perturbing the laser beam and/or perturbing a first length of fiber by any of a variety of methods (e.g., bending the fiber or introducing one or more other perturbations) and fully or partially maintaining adjusted beam characteristics in a second length of fiber. The second length of fiber is specially configured to maintain and/or further modify the adjusted beam characteristics. In some cases, the second length of fiber preserves the adjusted beam characteristics through delivery of the laser beam to its ultimate use (e.g., materials processing). The first and second lengths of fiber may comprise the same or different fibers.
The disclosed technology is compatible with fiber lasers and fiber-coupled lasers. Fiber-coupled lasers typically deliver an output via a delivery fiber having a step-index refractive index profile (RIP), i.e., a flat or constant refractive index within the fiber core. In reality, the RIP of the delivery fiber may not be perfectly flat, depending on the design of the fiber. Important parameters are the fiber core diameter (dcore) and NA. The core diameter is typically in the range of 10-1000 micron (although other values are possible), and the NA is typically in the range of 0.06-0.22 (although other values are possible). A delivery fiber from the laser may be routed directly to the process head or work piece, or it may be routed to a fiber-to-fiber coupler (FFC) or fiber-to-fiber switch (FFS), which couples the light from the delivery fiber into a process fiber that transmits the beam to the process head or the work piece.
Most materials processing tools, especially those at high power (>1 kW), employ multimode (MM) fiber, but some employ single-mode (SM) fiber, which is at the lower end of the dcore and NA ranges. The beam characteristics from a SM fiber are uniquely determined by the fiber parameters. The beam characteristics from a MM fiber, however, can vary (unit-to-unit and/or as a function of laser power and time), depending on the beam characteristics from the laser source(s) coupled into the fiber, the launching or splicing conditions into the fiber, the fiber RIP, and the static and dynamic geometry of the fiber (bending, coiling, motion, micro-bending, etc.). For both SM and MM delivery fibers, the beam characteristics may not be optimum for a given materials processing task, and it is unlikely to be optimum for a range of tasks, motivating the desire to be able to systematically vary the beam characteristics in order to customize or optimize them for a particular processing task.
In one example, the VBC fiber may have a first length and a second length and may be configured to be interposed as an in-fiber device between the delivery fiber and the process head to provide the desired adjustability of the beam characteristics. To enable adjustment of the beam, a perturbation device and/or assembly is disposed in close proximity to and/or coupled with the VBC fiber and is responsible for perturbing the beam in a first length such that the beam's characteristics are altered in the first length of fiber, and the altered characteristics are preserved or further altered as the beam propagates in the second length of fiber. The perturbed beam is launched into a second length of the VBC fiber configured to conserve adjusted beam characteristics. The first and second lengths of fiber may be the same or different fibers and/or the second length of fiber may comprise a confinement fiber. The beam characteristics that are conserved by the second length of VBC fiber may include any of: beam diameter, beam divergence distribution, BPP, intensity distribution, luminance, M2 factor, NA, optical intensity, power density, radial beam position, radiance, spot size, or the like, or any combination thereof.
In some disclosed embodiments, a fiber is referred to a being urged to conform to a surface. Unless otherwise indicated, such a fiber need not contact such a surface nor acquire a curvature corresponding to the surface.
A perturbation device 110 is disposed proximal to and/or envelops perturbation region 106. Perturbation device 110 may be a device, assembly, in-fiber structure, and/or other feature. Perturbation device 110 at least perturbs optical beam 102 in first length of fiber 104 or second length of fiber 108 or a combination thereof in order to adjust one or more beam characteristics of optical beam 102. Adjustment of beam 102 responsive to perturbation by perturbation device 110 may occur in first length of fiber 104 or second length of fiber 108 or a combination thereof. Perturbation region 106 may extend over various widths and may or may not extend into a portion of second length of fiber 108. As beam 102 propagates in VBC fiber 100, perturbation device 110 may physically act on VBC fiber 100 to perturb the fiber and adjust the characteristics of beam 102. Alternatively, perturbation device 110 may act directly on beam 102 to alter its beam characteristics. Subsequent to being adjusted, perturbed beam 112 has different beam characteristics than beam 102, which will be fully or partially conserved in second length of fiber 108. In another example, perturbation device 110 need not be disposed near a splice. Moreover, a splice may not be needed at all, for example VBC fiber 100 may be a single fiber, first length of fiber and second length of fiber could be spaced apart, or secured with a small gap (air-spaced or filled with an optical material, such as optical cement or an index-matching material).
Perturbed beam 112 is launched into second length of fiber 108, where perturbed beam 112 characteristics are largely maintained or continue to evolve as perturbed beam 112 propagates yielding the adjusted beam characteristics at the output of second length of fiber 108. In one example, the new beam characteristics may include an adjusted intensity distribution. In an example, an altered beam intensity distribution will be conserved in various structurally bounded confinement regions of second length of fiber 108. Thus, the beam intensity distribution may be tuned to a desired beam intensity distribution optimized for a particular laser processing task. In general, the intensity distribution of perturbed beam 112 will evolve as it propagates in the second length of fiber 108 to fill the confinement region(s) into which perturbed beam 112 is launched responsive to conditions in first length of fiber 104 and perturbation caused by perturbation device 110. In addition, the angular distribution may evolve as the beam propagates in the second fiber, depending on launch conditions and fiber characteristics. In general, fibers largely preserve the input divergence distribution, but the distribution can be broadened if the input divergence distribution is narrow and/or if the fiber has irregularities or deliberate features that perturb the divergence distribution. The various confinement regions, perturbations, and fiber features of second length of fiber 108 are described in greater detail below. Beams 102 and 112 are conceptual abstractions intended to illustrate how a beam may propagate through a VBC fiber 100 for providing variable beam characteristics and are not intended to closely model the behavior of a particular optical beam.
VBC fiber 100 may be manufactured by a variety of methods including PCVD (Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition), OVD (Outside Vapor Deposition), VAD (Vapor Axial Deposition), MOCVD (Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition.) and/or DND (Direct Nanoparticle Deposition). VBC fiber 100 may comprise a variety of materials. For example, VBC fiber 100 may comprise SiO2, SiO2 doped with GeO2, germanosilicate, phosphorus pentoxide, phosphosilicate, Al2O3, aluminosilicate, or the like or any combinations thereof. Confinement regions may be bounded by cladding doped with fluorine, boron, or the like or any combinations thereof. Other dopants may be added to active fibers, including rare-earth ions such as Er3+ (erbium), Yb3+ (ytterbium), Nd3+ (neodymium), Tm3+ (thulium), Ho3+ (holmium), or the like or any combination thereof. Confinement regions may be bounded by cladding having a lower index than the confinement region with fluorine or boron doping. Alternatively, VBC fiber 100 may comprise photonic crystal fibers or micro-structured fibers.
VBC fiber 100 is suitable for use in any of a variety of fiber, fiber optic, or fiber laser devices, including continuous wave and pulsed fiber lasers, disk lasers, solid state lasers, or diode lasers (pulse rate unlimited except by physical constraints). Furthermore, implementations in a planar waveguide or other types of waveguides and not just fibers are within the scope of the claimed technology.
In an example, first length of fiber 204 has a parabolic-index RIP 212 as indicated by the left RIP graph. Most of the intensity distribution of beam 202 is concentrated in the center of fiber 204 when fiber 204 is straight or nearly straight. Second length of fiber 208 is a confinement fiber having RIP 214 as shown in the right RIP graph. Second length of fiber 208 includes confinement regions 216, 218 and 220. Confinement region 216 is a central core surrounded by two annular (or ring-shaped) confinement regions 218 and 220. Layers 222 and 224 are structural barriers of lower index material between confinement regions (216, 218 and 220), commonly referred to as “cladding” regions. In one example, layers 222 and 224 may comprise rings of fluorosilicate; in some embodiments, the fluorosilicate cladding layers are relatively thin. Other materials may be used as well and claimed subject matter is not limited in this regard.
In an example, as beam 202 propagates along VBC fiber 200, perturbation assembly 210 may physically act on fiber 208 and/or beam 202 to adjust its beam characteristics and generate adjusted beam 226. In the current example, the intensity distribution of beam 202 is modified by perturbation assembly 210. Subsequent to adjustment of beam 202 the intensity distribution of adjusted beam 226 may be concentrated in outer confinement regions 218 and 220 with relatively little intensity in the central confinement region 216. Because each of confinement regions 216, 218, and/or 220 is isolated by the thin layers of lower index material in barrier layers 222 and 224, second length of fiber 208 can substantially maintain the adjusted intensity distribution of adjusted beam 226. The beam will typically become distributed azimuthally within a given confinement region but will not transition (significantly) between the confinement regions as it propagates along the second length of fiber 208. Thus, the adjusted beam characteristics of adjusted beam 226 are largely conserved within the isolated confinement regions 216, 218, and/or 220. In some cases, it be may desirable to have the beam 226 power divided among the confinement regions 216, 218, and/or 220 rather than concentrated in a single region, and this condition may be achieved by generating an appropriately adjusted beam 226.
In one example, core confinement region 216 and annular confinement regions 218 and 220 may be composed of fused silica glass, and cladding 222 and 224 defining the confinement regions may be composed of fluorosilicate glass. Other materials may be used to form the various confinement regions (216, 218 and 220), including germanosilicate, phosphosilicate, aluminosilicate, or the like, or a combination thereof and claimed subject matter is not so limited. Other materials may be used to form the barrier rings (222 and 224), including fused silica, borosilicate, or the like or a combination thereof, and claimed subject matter is not so limited. In other embodiments, the optical fibers or waveguides include or are composed of various polymers or plastics or crystalline materials. Generally, the core confinement regions have refractive indices that are greater than the refractive indices of adjacent barrier/cladding regions.
In some examples, it may be desirable to increase a number of confinement regions in a second length of fiber to increase granularity of beam control over beam displacements for fine-tuning a beam profile. For example, confinement regions may be configured to provide stepwise beam displacement.
Maintaining the bend radius of the fibers across junction 206 ensures that the adjusted beam characteristics such as radial beam position and radiance profile of optical beam 202 will not return to beam 202's unperturbed state before being launched into second length of fiber 208. Moreover, the adjusted radial beam characteristics, including position, divergence angle, and/or intensity distribution, of adjusted beam 226 can be varied based on an extent of decrease in the bend radius and/or the extent of the bent length of VBC fiber 200. Thus, specific beam characteristics may be obtained using this method.
In the current example, first length of fiber 204 having first RIP 212 is spliced at junction 206 to a second length of fiber 208 having a second RIP 214. However, it is possible to use a single fiber having a single RIP formed to enable perturbation (e.g., by micro-bending) of the beam characteristics of beam 202 and also to enable conservation of the adjusted beam. Such a RIP may be similar to the RIPs shown in fibers illustrated in
In an example, if VBC fiber 200 is straightened, LP01 mode will shift back toward the center of the fiber. Thus, the purpose of second length of fiber 208 is to “trap” or confine the adjusted intensity distribution of the beam in a confinement region that is displaced from the center of the VBC fiber 200. The splice between fibers 204 and 208 is included in the bent region, thus the shifted mode profile will be preferentially launched into one of the ring-shaped confinement regions 218 and 220 or be distributed among the confinement regions.
In an example, second length of fiber 208 confinement region 216 has a 100 micron diameter, confinement region 218 is between 120 micron and 200 micron in diameter, and confinement region 220 is between 220 micron and 300 micron diameter. Confinement regions 216, 218, and 220 are separated by 10 um thick rings of fluorosilicate, providing an NA of 0.22 for the confinement regions. Other inner and outer diameters for the confinement regions, thicknesses of the rings separating the confinement regions, NA values for the confinement regions, and numbers of confinement regions may be employed.
Referring again to
It is clear from
In a typical materials processing system (e.g., a cutting or welding tool), the output of the process fiber is imaged at or near the work piece by the process head. Varying the intensity distribution as shown in
In
Despite excitation of the confinement regions from one side at the splice junction 206, the intensity distributions are nearly symmetric azimuthally because of scrambling within confinement regions as the beam propagates within the VBC fiber 200. Although the beam will typically scramble azimuthally as it propagates, various structures or perturbations (e.g., coils) could be included to facilitate this process.
For the fiber parameters used in the experiment shown in
The results shown in
Different fiber parameters than those shown in
In
Similarly,
As noted previously, the divergence angle of a beam may be conserved or adjusted and then conserved in the second length of fiber. There are a variety of methods to change the divergence angle of a beam. The following are examples of fibers configured to enable adjustment of the divergence angle of a beam propagating from a first length of fiber to a second length of fiber in a fiber assembly for varying beam characteristics. However, these are merely examples and not an exhaustive recitation of the variety of methods that may be used to enable adjustment of divergence of a beam. Thus, claimed subject matter is not limited to the examples provided herein.
In laser system 2200, one or more of the free-space optics of assembly 2208 may be disposed in an FFC or other beam coupler 2216 to perform a variety of optical manipulations of an adjusted beam 2214 (represented in
FFCs can include one, two, or more lenses, but in typical examples, two lenses having the same nominal focal length are used, producing unit magnification. In most practical examples, magnification produced with an FFC is between 0.8 and 1.2, which corresponds to a ratio of focal lengths.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
In an example, beam switch 2332 includes one or more sets of free-space optics 2308, 2316, and 2318 configured to perform a variety of optical manipulations of adjusted beam 2314. Free-space optics 2308, 2316, and 2318 may preserve or vary adjusted beam characteristics of beam 2314. Thus, adjusted beam 2314 may be maintained by the free-space optics or adjusted further. Process fibers 2304, 2320, and 2322 may have the same or a different RIP as VBC delivery fiber 2340, depending on whether it is desirable to preserve or further modify a beam passing from the free-space optics assemblies 2308, 2316, and 2318 to respective process fibers 2304, 2320, and 2322. In other examples, one or more beam portions of beam 2310 are coupled to a workpiece without adjustment, or different beam portions are coupled to respective VBC fiber assemblies so that beam portions associated with a plurality of beam characteristics can be provided for simultaneous workpiece processing. Alternatively, beam 2310 can be switched to one or more of a set of VBC fiber assemblies.
Routing adjusted beam 2314 through any of free-space optics assemblies 2308, 2316, and 2318 enables delivery of a variety of additionally adjusted beams to process heads 2206, 2324, and 2326. Therefore, laser system 2300 provides additional degrees of freedom for varying the characteristics of a beam, as well as switching the beam between process heads (“time sharing”) and/or delivering the beam to multiple process heads simultaneously (“power sharing”).
For example, free-space optics in beam switch 2332 may direct adjusted beam 2314 to free-space optics assembly 2316 configured to preserve the adjusted characteristics of beam 2314. Process fiber 2304 may have the same RIP as VBC delivery fiber 2340. Thus, the beam delivered to process head 2306 will be a preserved adjusted beam 2314.
In another example, beam switch 2332 may direct adjusted beam 2314 to free-space optics assembly 2318 configured to preserve the adjusted characteristics of adjusted beam 2314. Process fiber 2320 may have a different RIP than VBC delivery fiber 2340 and may be configured with divergence altering structures as described with respect to
Process fibers 2304, 2320, and/or 2322 may comprise a RIP similar to any of the second lengths of fiber described above, including confinement regions or a wide variety of other RIPs, and claimed subject matter is not limited in this regard.
In yet another example, free-space optics switch 2332 may direct adjusted beam 2314 to free-space optics assembly 2308 configured to change the beam characteristics of adjusted beam 2314. Process fiber 2322 may have a different RIP than VBC delivery fiber 2340 and may be configured to preserve (or alternatively further modify) the new further adjusted characteristics of beam 2314. Thus, the beam delivered to process head 2326 will be a twice adjusted beam 2330 having different beam characteristics (due to the adjusted divergence profile and/or intensity profile) than adjusted beam 2314.
In
Mandrel 2402 may be used to perturb VBC fiber 200 by providing a form about which VBC fiber 200 may be bent. As discussed above, reducing the bend radius of VBC fiber 200 moves the intensity distribution of the beam radially outward. In some examples, mandrel 2402 may be stepped or conically shaped to provide discrete bend radii levels. Alternatively, mandrel 2402 may comprise a cone shape without steps to provide continuous bend radii for more granular control of the bend radius. The radius of curvature of mandrel 2402 may be constant (e.g., a cylindrical form) or non-constant (e.g., an oval-shaped form). Similarly, flexible tubing 2406, clamps 2416 (or other varieties of fasteners), or rollers 250 may be used to guide and control the bending of VBC fiber 200 about mandrel 2402. Furthermore, changing the length over which the fiber is bent at a particular bend radius also may modify the intensity distribution of the beam. VBC fiber 200 and mandrel 2402 may be configured to change the intensity distribution within the first fiber predictably (e.g., in proportion to the length over which the fiber is bent and/or the bend radius). Rollers 250 may move up and down along a track 2442 on platform 2434 to change the bend radius of VBC fiber 200.
Clamps 2416 (or other fasteners) may be used to guide and control the bending of VBC fiber 200 with or without a mandrel 2402. Clamps 2416 may move up and down along a track 2442 or platform 2446. Clamps 2416 may also swivel to change bend radius, tension, or direction of VBC fiber 200. Controller 2448 may control the movement of clamps 2416.
In another example, perturbation device 110 may be flexible tubing 2406 and may guide bending of VBC fiber 200 with or without a mandrel 2402. Flexible tubing 2406 may encase VBC fiber 200. Tubing 2406 may be made of a variety of materials and may be manipulated using piezoelectric transducers controlled by controller 2444. In another example, clamps or other fasteners may be used to move flexible tubing 2406.
Micro-bend 2404 in VBC fiber is a local perturbation caused by lateral mechanical stress on the fiber. Micro-bending can cause mode coupling and/or transitions from one confinement region to another confinement region within a fiber, resulting in varied beam characteristics of the beam propagating in a VBC fiber 200. Mechanical stress may be applied by an actuator 2436 that is controlled by controller 2440. However, this is merely an example of a method for inducing mechanical stress in fiber 200 and claimed subject matter is not limited in this regard.
Acousto-optic transducer (AOT) 2408 may be used to induce perturbation of a beam propagating in the VBC fiber using an acoustic wave. The perturbation is caused by the modification of the refractive index of the fiber by the oscillating mechanical pressure of an acoustic wave. The period and strength of the acoustic wave are related to the acoustic wave frequency and amplitude, allowing dynamic control of the acoustic perturbation. Thus, a perturbation assembly 110 including AOT 2408 may be configured to vary the beam characteristics of a beam propagating in the fiber. In an example, piezo-electric transducer 2418 may create the acoustic wave and may be controlled by controller or driver 2420. The acoustic wave induced in AOT 2408 may be modulated to change and/or control the beam characteristics of the optical beam in VBC 200 in real-time. However, this is merely an example of a method for creating and controlling an AOT 2408 and claimed subject matter is not limited in this regard.
Thermal device 2410 may be used to induce perturbation of a beam propagating in VBC fiber using heat. The perturbation is caused by the modification of the RIP of the fiber induced by heat. Perturbation may be dynamically controlled by controlling an amount of heat transferred to the fiber and the length over which the heat is applied. Thus, a perturbation assembly 110 including thermal device 2410 may be configured to vary a range of beam characteristics. Thermal device 2410 may be controlled by controller 2450.
Piezo-electric transducer 2412 may be used to induce perturbation of a beam propagating in a VBC fiber using piezoelectric action. The perturbation is caused by the modification of the RIP of the fiber induced by a piezoelectric material attached to the fiber. The piezoelectric material in the form of a jacket around the bare fiber may apply tension or compression to the fiber, modifying its refractive index via the resulting changes in density. Perturbation may be dynamically controlled by controlling a voltage to the piezo-electric device 2412. Thus, a perturbation assembly 110 including piezo-electric transducer 2412 may be configured to vary the beam characteristics over a particular range.
In an example, piezo-electric transducer 2412 may be configured to displace VBC fiber 200 in a variety of directions (e.g., axially, radially, and/or laterally) depending on a variety of factors, including how the piezo-electric transducer 2412 is attached to VBC fiber 200, the direction of the polarization of the piezo-electric materials, the applied voltage, etc. Additionally, bending of VBC fiber 200 is possible using the piezo-electric transducer 2412. For example, driving a length of piezo-electric material having multiple segments comprising opposing electrodes can cause a piezoelectric transducer 2412 to bend in a lateral direction. Voltage applied to piezoelectric transducer 2412 by electrode 2424 may be controlled by controller 2422 to control displacement of VBC fiber 200. Displacement may be modulated to change and/or control the beam characteristics of the optical beam in VBC 200 in real-time. However, this is merely an example of a method of controlling displacement of a VBC fiber 200 using a piezo-electric transducer 2412 and claimed subject matter is not limited in this regard.
Gratings 2414 may be used to induce perturbation of a beam propagating in a VBC fiber 200. A grating 2414 can be written into a fiber by inscribing a periodic variation of the refractive index into the core. Gratings 2414 such as fiber Bragg gratings can operate as optical filters or as reflectors. A long-period grating can induce transitions among co-propagating fiber modes. The radiance, intensity profile, and/or divergence profile of a beam comprised of one or more modes can thus be adjusted using a long-period grating to couple one or more of the original modes to one or more different modes having different radiance and/or divergence profiles. Adjustment is achieved by varying the periodicity or amplitude of the refractive index grating. Methods such as varying the temperature, bend radius, and/or length (e.g., stretching) of the fiber Bragg grating can be used for such adjustment. VBC fiber 200 having gratings 2414 may be coupled to stage 2426. Stage 2426 may be configured to execute any of a variety of functions and may be controlled by controller 2428. For example, stage 2426 may be coupled to VBC fiber 200 with fasteners 2430 and may be configured to stretch and/or bend VBC fiber 200 using fasteners 2430 for leverage. Stage 2426 may have an embedded thermal device and may change the temperature of VBC fiber 200.
With reference to
The guides 2906, 2908 can include surfaces that press fibers toward the fiber bending surface. For example, the guides 2906, 2908 can be made of or include an elastic portion of rubber, foam, cloth, fibers, or other material than can be urged against a fiber without compromising fiber integrity and to accommodate sharp surface irregularities that could damage fibers. The fiber bending surface such as the perimeter surface 2904 can be provided with a similar material along the entire surface or only at portions expected to be used in conforming fibers. Alternatively, the guides 2906, 2908 can include grooves such as a groove 2916 that retains a fiber and may or may not press the fiber against the fiber bending surface. For guides that are rotatable, grooves may extend around the entire perimeter so that a fiber is retained in the groove as the guide rotates and travels along the fiber bending surface.
The first fiber 2910 is typically connected to a second fiber 2920 with a splice 2918 such as a fusion splice (shown in possible two locations in
Locations of the guides 2906, 2908 can be controlled using motor 2930 that is coupled to the spokes 2907, 2909 to rotate to establish the angle θ. A controller 2932 is coupled to the motor 2930 so that the guides 2906, 2908 can be computer or processor controlled, or controlled manually. In some examples, the controller 2932 includes a non-transitory computer readable medium that includes a calibration table in which the angle θ and associated beam characteristics are stored. In systems having multiple guides, each can be arranged to be independently moved, and sections of one or more fibers can be selected.
In the example of
In the disclosed examples, an optical fiber that includes a length of a first optical fiber and a second optical fiber that are fusion spliced is bent at or near the fusion splice so as to vary a spatial beam profile or other beam characteristic produced in the first fiber or the second fiber. More efficient adjustment of spatial beam profile is typically achieved if the fusion splice is included in the bent portion of the fiber. However, the fusion splice can be located sufficiently close to the bent portion. Typically, the fusion splice should be situated within a length of less than about 2, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, or 1000 times a core diameter of either fiber. Sufficient fiber lengths can also depend on fiber numerical aperture as well. One possible explanation for the utility of bending either the first fiber or the second fiber is that bending of a fiber near a launch point, which is at the spliced junction 2918, can produce a variable spatial beam profile that propagates some distance before collapsing to an original beam shape. In a receiving (second) fiber, bending near a splice can perturb a spatial power distribution from the launching (first) fiber, and thus variably couple the received power into a selected spatial power distribution. The disclosure is not limited to operation in accordance with operation in this way, and this explanation is only provided as one potential explanation for convenience.
In
In some examples, the bend radius of a fiber is changed from a first bend radius R1 to a second bend radius R2 by using a stepped mandrel or a cone in a perturbation assembly. Fiber portions having different bend radii can be independently selected. Changing a bend radius of a fiber may change the radial beam position, divergence angle, and/or radiance profile, or other beam characteristics of a beam within the fiber.
In an example shown in a sectional view in
With reference to
Referring to
With reference to
As shown in
With reference to
A plurality of fiber shaping surfaces can be defined on a single substrate, if convenient, as shown in
In a further example shown in
In another example illustrated in
In some examples, a sensor 4610 is situated to determine beam perturbation or a condition of the beam perturbation device. The sensor 4610 is coupled to the control system 4608 to correct errors and drifts in beam perturbations, and/or to verify that the beam perturbation device is operating as intended. For example, VBC apparatus that include an ionic polymer layer can be provided with one or more additional electrodes that are coupled to an amplifier or other circuit to produce a signal indicative of layer deformation. This signal can be used to stabilize ionic polymer deformation. In other VBC apparatus, position, rotation, distance or other sensors can be included so that perturbations produced by a perturbation device can be detected and controlled to maintain a selected perturbation.
In another example shown in
In another example shown in
The VBC apparatus 4700, 4720, 4750 do not include a fiber bending surface. Such a surface is convenient is some embodiments as shown above, but is not required. In the examples of
Having described and illustrated the principles of the disclosed technology with reference to the illustrated embodiments, it will be recognized that the illustrated embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. The particular arrangements above are provided for convenient illustration, and other arrangements can be used.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/938,959, filed Mar. 28, 2018, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/607,399, filed May 26, 2017, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,423,015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/607,410, filed May 26, 2017, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/607,411, filed May 26, 2017, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,295,845, and Patent Cooperation Treat Application No. PCT/US2017/034848, filed May 26, 2017, all of which claim the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/401,650, filed Sep. 29, 2016. These applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4252403 | Salisbury | Feb 1981 | A |
4266851 | Salisbury | May 1981 | A |
4315666 | Hicks, Jr. | Feb 1982 | A |
4614868 | Alster | Sep 1986 | A |
4698480 | Klingel | Oct 1987 | A |
4725124 | Taylor | Feb 1988 | A |
4770492 | Levin et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4822135 | Seaver | Apr 1989 | A |
4915468 | Kim | Apr 1990 | A |
4953947 | Bhagavatula | Sep 1990 | A |
5427733 | Benda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5530221 | Benda et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5566196 | Scifres | Oct 1996 | A |
5732178 | Terasawa | Mar 1998 | A |
5837962 | Overbeck | Nov 1998 | A |
5915050 | Russell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6180912 | Tatah | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192171 | Goodman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6304704 | Kalish et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6360042 | Long | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6477301 | Anthon et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483973 | Mazzarese | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487338 | Asawa | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6564442 | Kilian | May 2003 | B2 |
6600149 | Schulz et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621044 | Jain | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6694079 | Matsuo | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6895154 | Johnson | May 2005 | B2 |
6947802 | Picard | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7174078 | Libori | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7215858 | Po | May 2007 | B2 |
7242834 | Lee | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260292 | Sahlgren | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260299 | Di Teodoro | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7426410 | Zuluaga | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437041 | Po | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7519251 | Aalto | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7592568 | Varnham | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7783149 | Fini | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7876495 | Minelly | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7907810 | Messerly | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916762 | Messerly | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7996069 | Zuluaga | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8218928 | Jasapara | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8270787 | Sumetsky | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8488925 | Sumetsky | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8546717 | Stecker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8628227 | Olschowsky | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660396 | Tanigawa | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8731010 | Messerly | May 2014 | B2 |
8755660 | Minelly | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8781269 | Huber | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798422 | Messerly | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8811787 | Feuer | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8903211 | Fini et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8909017 | Jasapara | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8923678 | Fini | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8934742 | Voss | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8958144 | Rataj et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8983260 | Sillard | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9046654 | Salokatve | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9140873 | Minelly | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9170367 | Messerly | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9250390 | Muendel | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9310560 | Chann | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9339890 | Woods | May 2016 | B2 |
9366887 | Tayebati | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9399264 | Stecker | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431786 | Savage-Leuchs | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9482821 | Huber | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9636775 | Huang | May 2017 | B2 |
9709676 | Eno | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9823422 | Muendel | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9839977 | Liebl | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10112262 | Cheverton | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10189114 | Stecker | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10201875 | Liebl | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10214833 | Kaehr et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10281656 | Huber | May 2019 | B2 |
10337335 | Pavlov | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10576581 | Liebl | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10646963 | Victor | May 2020 | B2 |
10656427 | Rivera | May 2020 | B2 |
10656440 | Kliner | May 2020 | B2 |
10663767 | Kliner | May 2020 | B2 |
10670872 | Karlsen | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10705348 | Martinsen | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10730785 | Brown | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10751834 | Koponen | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10971885 | Kliner et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11215761 | Huber | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11344967 | Stecker | May 2022 | B2 |
20010005439 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010045149 | Dunsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020126954 | Aswawa | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130279 | Jain | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020176676 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030204283 | Picard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040247222 | Park | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249289 | Zuluaga | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050069269 | Libori | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105854 | Dong et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111802 | Lee | May 2005 | A1 |
20060013532 | Wan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060215976 | Singh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219673 | Varnham | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070041083 | Di Teodoro | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070104431 | Di Teodoro | May 2007 | A1 |
20070164005 | Matsuda | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206900 | Po | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070280597 | Nakai et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297738 | Aalto | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080251504 | Lu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260338 | Messerly | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285927 | Khan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012407 | Zuluaga | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032394 | Wu | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059352 | Fini | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059353 | Fini | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090202191 | Ramachandran | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090296747 | Messerly | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100150201 | Shin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195194 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209044 | Sumetsky | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100271689 | Jasapara | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100326969 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110061591 | Stecker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110129190 | Fini | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110134512 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110188826 | Sillard | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110243164 | Messerly | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249940 | Sasaoka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253668 | Winoto et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110305251 | Tanigawa | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120128294 | Voss | May 2012 | A1 |
20120237164 | Jasapara | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120301077 | Sumetsky | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120321260 | Messerly | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130044768 | Ter-Mikirtychev | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130114285 | Olschowsky | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136404 | Feuer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146569 | Woods | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130148925 | Muendel | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130202264 | Messerly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223792 | Huber | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130294728 | Rockwell | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343947 | Satzger | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140014629 | Stecker | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021178 | Brockmann | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150060422 | Liebl | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150086159 | Salokatve et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150104139 | Brunet | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150198052 | Pavlov | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150241632 | Chann | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150246481 | Schlick | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150293306 | Huber | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150331205 | Tayebati | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150378184 | Tayebati | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160016369 | Tarbutton | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036193 | Eno | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160097903 | Li | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104995 | Savage-Leuchs | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160114431 | Cheverton | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160116679 | Muendel | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160175935 | Ladewig et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160184925 | Huang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160202285 | Wang | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160288244 | Stecker | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320685 | Tayebati | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170003461 | Tayebati | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170036299 | Goya et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170090462 | Dave et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170336580 | Tayebati | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180104770 | Liebl | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190047085 | Liebl | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190084082 | Ito | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190143445 | Stecker | May 2019 | A1 |
20190217422 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190262949 | Malinowski et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190270161 | Allenberg-Rabe et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200251237 | Gross | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200263978 | Pieger et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200333640 | Kliner et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20220258276 | Stecker | Aug 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2242139 | Dec 1999 | CA |
2292974 | Jun 2000 | CA |
101071926 | Nov 2007 | CN |
103293594 | Jun 2013 | CN |
104136952 | Nov 2014 | CN |
0048855 | May 1982 | EP |
0798067 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1340583 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2596901 | May 2013 | EP |
2732890 | May 2014 | EP |
60046892 | Mar 1985 | JP |
H07113922 | Dec 1995 | JP |
10282450 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H11-231138 | Aug 1999 | JP |
H11-344636 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001166172 | Jun 2001 | JP |
200455366 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-203430 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006-285234 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-518566 | Jul 2007 | JP |
4112355 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009-193070 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2010115686 | May 2010 | JP |
2011134736 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011221191 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2014509263 | Apr 2014 | JP |
2015-500571 | Jan 2015 | JP |
504425 | Oct 2002 | TW |
200174529 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2002084350 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2003044914 | May 2003 | WO |
2004056524 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005053895 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2020050774 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012088361 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013086227 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2015146591 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015151865 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2016031895 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2016031895 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016059938 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016156824 | Oct 2016 | WO |
2016198724 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017036695 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Salceda-Delgado et al., Compact fiber-optic curvature sensor based on super-mode interference in a seven-core fiber, Optics Letters, V. 40, N. 7, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
Schermer, Ross, Mode scalability in bent optical fibers, Optics Express, V. 15, N. 24, 2007 (Year: 2007). |
Villatoro et al, Photonic crystal fiber interferometric vector bending sensor, Optics Letters, V. 40, N. 13, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
Yoda et al., Beam Quality Factor of Higher Order Modes in a Step-Index Fiber, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 24, No. 3, 2006 (Year: 2006). |
Birks et al., RR 2015, ‘The photonic lantern’, Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 107-167. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.7.000107. (Year: 2015). |
Leon-Saval et al., Photonic Lanterns, Nanophotonics 2013; 2(5-6): 429-440 (Year: 2013). |
Eilzer et al., “Industrial fiber beam delivery system for ultrafast lasers: applications and recent advances,” Proc. SPIE 9741, High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Lasers, Beam Delivery, Diagnostics, and Applications V, 974103 (Mar. 18, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2214290 (Year: 2016). |
Williams et al., “Measuring laser power as a force: a new paradigm to accurately monitor optical power during laser-based machining operations,” Proc. SPIE 9741, High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Lasers, Beam Delivery, Diagnostics, and Applications V, 97410L (Year: 2016). |
Thombansen et al., “Observation of melting conditions in selective laser melting of metals (SLM),” Proc. SPIE 9741, High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Lasers, Beam Delivery, Diagnostics, and Applications V, 97410S (Mar. 18, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2213952 (Year: 2016). |
Stritt et al., “Comprehensive process monitoring for laser welding process optimization,” Proc. SPIE 9741, High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Lasers, Beam Delivery, Diagnostics, and Applications V, 97410Q (Mar. 18, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2212814 (Year: 2016). |
Simmons et al., “Development of a non-contact diagnostic tool for high power lasers,” Proc. SPIE 9741, High-Power Laser Materials Processing: Lasers, Beam Delivery, Diagnostics, and Applications V, 97410N (Mar. 18, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2213605 (Year: 2016). |
Lempe et al., “Analysis of weld seam uniformity through temperature distribution by spatially resolved detector elements in the wavelength range of 0.3μm to 5μm for the detection of structural changing heating and cooling processes,” Proc. SPIE 9741 (Year: 2016). |
Joel Villatoro, Vladimir P. Minkovich, and Joseba Zubia, “Photonic crystal fiber interferometric vector bending sensor,” Opt. Lett. 40, 3113-3116 (2015) (Year: 2016). |
Michael J. Messerly, Paul H. Pax, Jay W. Dawson, Raymond J. Beach, and John E. Heebner, “Field-flattened, ring-like propagation modes,” Opt. Express 21, 12683-12698 (2013) (Year: 2013). |
Ross T. Schermer, “Mode scalability in bent optical fibers,” Opt. Express 15, 15674-15701 (2007) (Year: 2017). |
G. Salceda-Delgado, A. Van Newkirk, J. E. Antonio-Lopez, A. Martinez-Rios, A. Schülzgen, and R. Amezcua Correa, “Compact fiber-optic curvature sensor based on super-mode interference in a seven-core fiber,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1468-1471 (2015) (Year: 2015). |
Victor, Brian M., Custom Beam Shaping for High-Power Fiber Laser Welding, Thesis, The Ohio State University, 2009. (Year: 2009). |
Hidehiko Yoda, Pavel Polynkin, and Masud Mansuripur, “Beam Quality Factor of Higher Order Modes in a Step-Index Fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24, 1350—(2006) (Year: 2006). |
P. Vaity, C. Brunet, Y. Messaddeq, S. LaRochelle and L. A. Rusch, “Exciting OAM modes in annular-core fibers via perfect OAM beams,” 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Cannes, France, 2014, pp. 1-3, doi: 10.1109/ECOC.2014.6964195. (Year: 2014). |
Van Newkirk et al., Bending sensor combining multicore fiber with a mode-selective photonic lantern, Optics Letters, V. 40, N. 22, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
Uden et al., Ultra-high-density spatial division multiplexing with a few-mode multicore fibre. Nature Photonics, 8(11), 865-870, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
Kuang et al., Plastic Optical Fiber Displacement Sensor Based on Dual Cycling Bending, Sensors 2010, 10, 10198-10210; doi: 10.3390/s101110198 (Year: 2010). |
Donlagic et al., Propagation of the Fundamental Mode in Curved Graded Index Multimode Fiber and Its Application in Sensor Systems, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 18, No. 3, Mar. 2000 (Year: 2000). |
Anderson DZ, Bolshtyansky MA, Zel'dovich BY. Stabilization of the speckle pattern of a multimode fiber undergoing bending. Opt Lett. Jun. 1, 1996;21(11):785-7. doi: 10.1364/ol.21.000785. PMID: 19876158. (Year: 1996). |
R. Wang et al., “Highly Sensitive Curvature Sensor Using an In-Fiber Mach-Zehnder Interferometer,” in IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 1766-1770, May 2013, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2243834. (Year: 2013). |
Blecher, J. & Palmer, Todd & Kelly, Shawn & Martukanitz, Richard. (2012). Identifying Performance Differences in Transmissive and Reflective Laser Optics Using Beam Diagnostic Tools. Welding Journal. 91. 204S-214S. (Year: 2012). |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805726.9, dated Nov. 3, 2020, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805628.7, dated Nov. 6, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805019.9, dated Nov. 9, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805369.8, dated Nov. 9, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18806895.1, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805491.0, dated Nov. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18804952.2, dated Nov. 24, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805725.1, dated Nov. 24, 2020, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18805152.8, dated Nov. 30, 2020, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18703678.5, dated Dec. 18, 2020, 14 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 18806084.2, dated Jan. 25, 2021, 40 pages. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report from European Application No. 18806154.3, dated Feb. 5, 2021, 16 pages. |
Villatoro et al., “Photonic Crystal Fiber Interferometric Vector Bending Sensor,” Optics Letters, 40(13):3113-3116 (Jul. 1, 2015). |
Yoda et al., “Beam Quality Factor of Higher Order Modes in a Step-Index Fiber,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, 24(3):1350-1355 (Mar. 2006). |
Schermer, Ross: “Mode Scalability in bent Optical Fibers”; optics Express, V 15, N. Nov. 24, 2007. |
Cindy Fernandes et al.; Curvature and Vibration Sensing Based on Core Diameter Mismatch Structures; IEEE transaction on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 65. No. 9; Sep. 2016; pp. 2120-2128. |
Anderson et al, “On the Use of Microbend Fiber Optic Mode Strippers and Scramblers: Cautionary Note,” Appl. Opt. 34, 8082-8083 (1995). |
Jin et al., “Numerical investigation for Microbending Loss in Optical Fibres”, J. Lightwave Technol. 34, 1247-1253 (2016). |
Ploschner et al., “Compact Multimode Fiber Beam-shaping System Based on GPU Accelerated Digital Holography”, Opt. Lett. 40, 197-200 (2015). |
Ramachandran et al., “Optical Vortices in Fiber”, Nanophotonics, vol. 2, No. 5-6, (2013) pp. 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2013-0047. |
Weber et al., “Effects of Radial and Tangential Polarization in Laser Material Processing”, Physicas Procedia, vol. 12, Part A, pp. 21-30, ISSN 1875-3892 (2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200354261 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62401650 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15938959 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16879533 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15607410 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15938959 | US | |
Parent | 15607399 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15607410 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2017/034848 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15607399 | US | |
Parent | 15607411 | May 2017 | US |
Child | PCT/US2017/034848 | US |