The present disclosure relates generally to connectors having remote release, and more specifically to narrow width adapters and connectors, such as narrow pitch distance Lucent Connector (LC) duplex adapters and narrow width multi-fiber connectors.
The prevalence of the Internet has led to unprecedented growth in communication networks. Consumer demand for service and increased competition has caused network providers to continuously find ways to improve quality of service while reducing cost.
Certain solutions have included deployment of high-density interconnect panels. High-density interconnect panels may be designed to consolidate the increasing volume of interconnections necessary to support the fast-growing networks into a compacted form factor, thereby increasing quality of service and decreasing costs such as floor space and support overhead. However, the deployment of high-density interconnect panels has not been fully realized.
In communication networks, such as data centers and switching networks, numerous interconnections between mating connectors may be compacted into high-density panels. Panel and connector producers may optimize for such high densities by shrinking the connector size and/or the spacing between adjacent connectors on the panel. While both approaches may be effective to increase the panel connector density, shrinking the connector size and/or spacing may also increase the support cost and diminish the quality of service.
In a high-density panel configuration, adjacent connectors and cable assemblies may obstruct access to individual release mechanisms. Such physical obstructions may impede the ability of an operator to minimize the stresses applied to the cables and the connectors. For example, these stresses may be applied when a user reaches into a dense group of connectors and pushes aside surrounding optical fibers and connectors to access an individual connector release mechanism with his/her thumb and forefinger. Overstressing the cables and connectors may produce latent defects, compromise the integrity and/or reliability of the terminations, and potentially cause serious disruptions to network performance.
While an operator may attempt to use a tool, such as a screwdriver, to reach into a dense group of connectors and activate a release mechanism, adjacent cables and connectors may obstruct the operator's line of sight, making it difficult to guide the tool to the release mechanism without pushing aside the adjacent cables. Moreover, even when the operator has a clear line of sight, guiding the tool to the release mechanism may be a time-consuming process. Thus, using a tool may not be effective at reducing support time and increasing the quality of service.
Small Form Factor Pluggable Transceivers (SFP) are used presently in telecommunication infrastructures within rack mounted copper-to-fiber media converters, and are also known as Ethernet switches and/or patching hubs. These infrastructure Ethernet and fiber optic connections are evolving quickly to increase connection density due to limited space for such equipment. Although fiber optic connectors have become smaller over the years, they have not been designed to be any smaller than necessary to plug into commonly sized and readily available SFPs. However, as transceiver technologies develop, smaller SFPs will be used to create higher density switches and/or patching hub equipment. Accordingly, there is a need for fiber optic connectors that will meet the needs of future developments in smaller SFPs.
In summary, one aspect provides a connector comprising: a front body comprising: a top and a bottom, a recess running lengthwise on the top of the front body, and a rear body detachably connected to the front body forming a housing, wherein a portion of the rear body fits inside the front body when detachably connected; and a push-pull tab comprising a front portion, a rear portion, and one or more side portions, wherein the push-pull tab is detachably connected to the housing using the one or more side portions, wherein the front portion sits in the recess.
Another aspect provides a receiver device comprising: one or more ports for receiving a connector having a top and a bottom; the one or more ports comprising at least one cutout on the top; and the one or more ports comprising at least one guide rail on the bottom, wherein the at least one cutout is configured to receive an interchangeable anchor device.
A further aspect provides a network system comprising: a connector comprising a housing comprising a groove running widthwise on a surface of the housing; and a push-pull tab comprising a complementary groove, wherein the push-pull tab is detachably connected to the housing; and a receiver device comprising one or more ports for receiving the connector, the one or more ports having an interchangeable anchor device including a first portion and a second portion; wherein the groove is configured to receive the first portion of the interchangeable anchor device when the connector is inserted into the receiving element, and wherein the complimentary groove is configured to receive the second portion of the interchangeable anchor device when the connector is inserted into the receiving element, the push-pull tab being configured to disengage the second portion of the interchangeable anchor device from the complementary groove when the push-pull tab is moved in a direction away from the connector, thereby disengaging the first portion of the interchangeable anchor device from the grove of the connector.
This disclosure is not limited to the particular systems, devices and methods described, as these may vary. The terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope.
As used in this document, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Nothing in this disclosure is to be construed as an admission that the embodiments described in this disclosure are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
The following terms shall have, for the purposes of this application, the respective meanings set forth below.
A connector, as used herein, refers to a device and/or component thereof that connects a first module or cable to a second module or cable. The connector may be configured for fiber optic transmission or electrical signal transmission. The connector may be any suitable type now known or later developed, such as, for example, a ferrule connector (FC), a fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) connector, an LC connector, a mechanical transfer (MT) connector, a square connector (SC) connector, an SC duplex connector, or a straight tip (ST) connector. The connector may generally be defined by a connector housing body. In some embodiments, the housing body may incorporate any or all of the components described herein.
A “fiber optic cable” or an “optical cable” refers to a cable containing one or more optical fibers for conducting optical signals in beams of light. The optical fibers can be constructed from any suitable transparent material, including glass, fiberglass, and plastic. The cable can include a jacket or sheathing material surrounding the optical fibers. In addition, the cable can be connected to a connector on one end or on both ends of the cable.
Various embodiments described herein generally provide a remote release mechanism such that a user can remove cable assembly connectors that are closely spaced together on a high-density panel without damaging surrounding connectors, accidentally disconnecting surrounding connectors, disrupting transmissions through surrounding connectors, and/or the like. Various embodiments also provide narrow pitch LC duplex connectors and narrow width multi-fiber connectors, for use, for example, with future narrow pitch LC SFPs and future narrow width SFPs. The remote release mechanisms allow use of the narrow pitch LC duplex connectors and narrow width multi-fiber connectors in dense arrays of narrow pitch LC SFPs and narrow width multi-fiber SFPs.
Various embodiments disclosed herein are configured for use with a future SFP, such as the narrow pitch LC SFP 300 shown in
According to another aspect, embodiments of narrow pitch duplex LC adapters are disclosed.
In addition to the need for narrow connectors, there is a need for remote unlatching of the narrow connectors used in dense narrow SFP arrays. This is because finger access to connectors is nearly impossible without disruption to the service of adjacent optical fibers. Although there are current designs of remotely unlatching fiber optic connectors, as shown for example in
To make the latching/unlatching of the connectors from the SFP more reliable, various embodiments disclosed herein add a spring force to the remote latching component (pull tab), for example as shown and described in relation to
The connector 500 further includes a housing 506 having a bottom housing 508 and a top housing 510. The bottom housing 508 includes side walls 512. In various embodiments, the housing 506 of the connector 500 may be a switchable housing. The side walls 512 may be configured to open so as to facilitate opening of the housing 506, for example, to change polarity of the connector 500. The side walls 512 may be raised towards the rear of the connector 500, as shown in
The connector 500 further includes a pull tab 514 having a distal end 516 and a proximal end 518. The pull tab 514 further includes a spring 520 configured to provide a force such that the connector latching arms 504 return to the undisplaced position and thereby become fully engaged inside the SFP's recess. The distal end 516 of the pull tab 514 may be pulled to remotely release the connector 500 from an SFP or adapter. The proximal end 518 of the pull tab 514 is uniquely shaped so as to engage with the unique profile of the latching arms 504 of the narrow pitch LC connector 500. The proximal end 518 engages both latching arms 504 of the duplex LC connector 500. That is, the proximal end 518 includes a single prong configured to engage the latching arms of both connectors 502. At the proximal end 518 of the pull tab 514 there are outwardly pointing pins 522 configured to rest directly above and slide along the semi-circular surface of latching arms 504 of the duplex LC connectors 502. The horizontal and rearward path direction of the pins 522 causes the semi-circular profile of the connector latching arms 504 to flex downward. Because the pins 522 are not contained inside ramped grooves of the connector latching arms 504, the pull tab 514 can also be pushed down at a location directly behind the LC connectors 502 rather than pulling the tab in a rearward motion from a remote distance behind the connectors, such as from the distal end 516. The action of pushing down the connectors' integral levers or latching arms 504 unlatches the connector 500. In some cases, the horizontal motion of the pull tab 514 may not be desirable. Thus, the connector latching arms 504 may be pushed down without resulting in a horizontal motion of the pull tab 514.
The connector 1200 further includes a housing 1206 having a bottom housing 1208 and a top housing 1210. The bottom housing 1208 includes side walls 1212. In various embodiments, the housing 1206 of the connector 1200 may be a switchable housing. The side walls 1212 may be configured to open so as to facilitate opening of the housing 1206, for example, to change polarity of the connector 1200. The side walls 1212 may be raised towards the rear of the connector 1200. One advantage of raising the side walls 1212 towards the rear of the connector 1200 is easier access. The side walls 1212 may also be raised at another location.
The connector 1200 further includes a pull tab 1214 having a distal end 1216 and a proximal end 1218. The pull tab 1214 further includes a spring 1220 configured to provide a force such that the connector latching arms 1204 return to the undisplaced position and thereby become fully engaged inside the SFP's recess. The distal end 1216 of the pull tab 1214 may be pulled to remotely release the connector 1200 from an SFP or adapter. The proximal end 1218 of the pull tab 1214 is uniquely shaped so as to engage with the unique profile of the latching arms 1204 of the narrow width multi-fiber connector 1200. The proximal end 1218 engages both latching arms 1204 of the multi-fiber connector 1200. That is, the proximal end 1218 includes a single prong configured to engage the latching arms 1204. At the proximal end 1218 of the pull tab 1214 there are outwardly pointing pins 1222 configured to rest directly above and slide along the semi-circular surface of latching arms 1204. The horizontal and rearward path direction of the pins 1222 causes the semi-circular profile of the connector latching arms 1204 to flex downward. Because the pins 1222 are not contained inside ramped grooves of the connector latching arms 1204, the pull tab 1214 can also be pushed down at a location directly behind the latching arms 1204 rather than pulling the tab in a rearward motion from a remote distance behind the connector, such as from the distal end 1216. The action of pushing down the connector's integral levers or latching arms 1204 unlatches the connector 1200. In some cases, the horizontal motion of the pull tab 1214 may not be desirable. Thus, the connector latching arms 1204 may be pushed down without resulting in a horizontal motion of the pull tab 1214.
In various embodiments described above, the narrow width connectors have latching arms configured to engage with a fixed or immovable recess within a narrow width SFP or a narrow width adapter. In these embodiments, the pull tab of the connector displaces the flexible latching arm of the connector so as to disengage the latching arm from the recess of the SFP or the adapter. For example, the latching arms bend down as the pull tab is pulled back, so as to disengage the connector from the SFP or the adapter.
In other embodiments, as further described for example in relation with
Although
As discussed herein, various types of connectors exist with various methods of implementation. Referring now to
In some embodiments, the CS connector may comprise a front body (i.e., plug frame) 2301, which houses the ferrule(s) and ferrules flange(s) 2302. A rear body (i.e., back post) 2304 may connect to the rear of the front body 2301 and contain the ferrule-flange(s) 2302. The ferrule-flange(s) 2302 may be held in place using one or more springs 2303. The rear body 2304, as shown, may include a crimp ring 2305 attached to the rear of the rear body. In some embodiments, a cable boot 2306 may surround the crimp ring 2305. In some embodiments, and as shown, a dust cap 2307 may be placed over the front body 2301 in order to protect the ferrules housed in the front body from damage and/or debris.
In additional embodiments, a push-pull tab 2310 may attach to the CS connector, as discussed in more detail herein. The push-pull tab 2310 may have a side portion 2312 and a center protrusion (i.e., 2313), which serve various functions discussed further herein. The push-pull tab 2310 may utilize a tab spring 2308 to apply a constant directional force on the push-pull tab to allow for various benefits which are discussed herein. Referring briefly to
In one or more embodiments, and as shown in
As disclosed herein, a connector (e.g., a CS connector) may have a push-pull tab to allow for easy insertion and extraction from an adapter. Referring now to
In a further embodiment, the push-pull tab 2510 may be moved away from the rear body by a distance 2513 of about 1 mm to about 3 mm. The push-pull tab 2510 may have a center protrusion (such as 2314 in
Referring to
As shown in
Referring now to
The connectors (e.g., CS connectors) disclosed herein may be inserted into an adapter (e.g., a fiber optic port), such as for example in a fiber array or server. A non-limiting illustrative example of a typical adapter is shown in
It should be understood, that various portions of a connector system (e.g., CS connector system) may have adjustments made to accommodate various situations. One non-limiting example of these variations is shown in
The embodiments shown in
It should be understood, that the removable modification device (i.e., interchangeable anchor device) may vary in style and design.
In a further embodiment, and as shown in
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring now to
The use of a CS connector allows for a compact fiber implementation, as well as improved flexibility. For example, in some existing systems, as shown in
Alternatively, in some embodiments, and as shown in
A specific example using multi-strand cables is shown in
In the above detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be used, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented herein. It will be readily understood that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in the Figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, separated, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations, all of which are explicitly contemplated herein.
The present disclosure is not to be limited in terms of the particular embodiments described in this application, which are intended as illustrations of various aspects. Many modifications and variations can be made without departing from its spirit and scope, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Functionally equivalent methods and apparatuses within the scope of the disclosure, in addition to those enumerated herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing descriptions. Such modifications and variations are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. The present disclosure is to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to particular methods, reagents, compounds, compositions, or biological systems, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (for example, bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (for example, the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” et cetera). While various compositions, methods, and devices are described in terms of “comprising” various components or steps (interpreted as meaning “including, but not limited to”), the compositions, methods, and devices can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps, and such terminology should be interpreted as defining essentially closed-member groups. It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to embodiments containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (for example, “a” and/or “an” should be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (for example, the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, et cetera” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (for example, “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, et cetera). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, et cetera” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (for example, “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, et cetera). It will be further understood by those within the art that virtually any disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”
In addition, where features or aspects of the disclosure are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group.
As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, such as in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass any and all possible subranges and combinations of subranges thereof. Any listed range can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, et cetera As a non-limiting example, each range discussed herein can be readily broken down into a lower third, middle third and upper third, et cetera As will also be understood by one skilled in the art all language such as “up to,” “at least,” and the like include the number recited and refer to ranges which can be subsequently broken down into subranges as discussed above. Finally, as will be understood by one skilled in the art, a range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells. Similarly, a group having 1-5 cells refers to groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.
Various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art, each of which is also intended to be encompassed by the disclosed embodiments.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/581,949 filed on Jan. 23, 2022, entitled “ADAPTER” Which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/988,581 filed on Aug. 7, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,287,583 entitled “NARROW WIDTH FIBER OPTIC CONNECTOR”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/297,614 filed on Mar. 9, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,739,533 entitled “RECEIVER CONFIGURED TO ACCEPT A REMOVABLE ANCHOR DEVICE FOR SECURING A FIBER OPTIC CONNECTOR WITHIN THE RECEIVER”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/720,980, filed Sep. 29, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,228,521 entitled “Narrow Width Adapters and Connectors with Modular Latching Arm” that claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/546,920 filed on Aug. 17, 2017, entitled “Narrow Width Adapters and Connectors with Modular Latching Arm” and further claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/457,150 filed on Feb. 9, 2017, entitled “Optical Fiber Connector” and further claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/452,147 filed Jan. 30, 2017, entitled “Narrow Width Adapters and Connectors with Modular Latching Arm,” and further claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/430,560, filed Dec. 6, 2016 entitled “Narrow Width Adapters and Connectors with Spring Loaded Remote Release”, and further claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/430,067, filed Dec. 5, 2016 entitled “Narrow Width Adapters and Connectors with Spring Loaded Remote Release” each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3733576 | Cooper | May 1973 | A |
4150790 | Potter | Apr 1979 | A |
4327964 | Haesly | May 1982 | A |
4478473 | Frear | Oct 1984 | A |
4645295 | Pronovost | Feb 1987 | A |
4762388 | Tanaka | Aug 1988 | A |
4764129 | Jones | Aug 1988 | A |
4840451 | Sampson | Jun 1989 | A |
4872736 | Myers | Oct 1989 | A |
4979792 | Weber | Dec 1990 | A |
5041025 | Haitmanek | Aug 1991 | A |
D323143 | Ohkura et al. | Jan 1992 | S |
5181267 | Gerace et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5212752 | Stephenson | May 1993 | A |
5222168 | Saito et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5265181 | Chang | Nov 1993 | A |
5289554 | Cubukciyan | Feb 1994 | A |
5317663 | Beard | May 1994 | A |
5335301 | Newman | Aug 1994 | A |
5348487 | Marazzi | Sep 1994 | A |
5390272 | Repta et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5444806 | de Marchi | Aug 1995 | A |
5481634 | Anderson | Jan 1996 | A |
5506922 | Grois | Apr 1996 | A |
5521997 | Rovenolt | May 1996 | A |
5528712 | Belenkiy et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5570445 | Chou | Oct 1996 | A |
5588079 | Tanabe | Dec 1996 | A |
5615293 | Sayegh | Mar 1997 | A |
5673346 | Iwano et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684903 | Kyomasu | Nov 1997 | A |
5687268 | Stephenson | Nov 1997 | A |
5719977 | Lampert et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5781681 | Manning | Jul 1998 | A |
5845036 | De Marchi | Dec 1998 | A |
5915058 | Clairardin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5937130 | Amberg | Aug 1999 | A |
5956444 | Duda | Sep 1999 | A |
5971626 | Knodell | Oct 1999 | A |
6041155 | Anderson | Mar 2000 | A |
6049040 | Biles | Apr 2000 | A |
6134370 | Childers | Oct 2000 | A |
6146023 | Weigel | Nov 2000 | A |
6149313 | Giebel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178283 | Weigel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
RE37080 | Stephenson | Mar 2001 | E |
6206577 | Hall, III | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206581 | Driscoll | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220762 | Kanai et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224268 | Manning et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227717 | Ott | May 2001 | B1 |
6238104 | Yamakawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6247849 | Liu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276840 | Weiss | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305961 | Szilagyi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331079 | Grois et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357931 | Shirakawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364537 | Maynard | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6364685 | Manning | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371659 | Weigel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386768 | Yoon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419399 | Loder et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450695 | Matsumoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461054 | Iwase | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471412 | Belenkiy | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478472 | Anderson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511230 | Connelly et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6551117 | Poplawski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568861 | Benner et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575640 | Connelly et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579014 | Melton | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6634801 | Waldron | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648520 | McDonald | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668113 | Togami | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682228 | Rathnam | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685362 | Burkholder | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695486 | Falkenberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6715928 | Matasek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6764222 | Szilagyi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6796715 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6848836 | Ueda | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854894 | Yunker | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6872039 | Baus | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6918704 | Marrs et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929406 | Amorim | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935789 | Gross, III | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7001081 | Cox et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7052186 | Bates | May 2006 | B1 |
7090406 | Melton | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090407 | Melton | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091421 | Kukita | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111990 | Melton | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113679 | Melton | Sep 2006 | B2 |
D533504 | Lee | Dec 2006 | S |
7150567 | Luther et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153041 | Mine | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198409 | Smith | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204644 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207724 | Gurreri | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D543124 | Raatikainen | May 2007 | S |
D543146 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | S |
7234879 | Schrodinger | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7258493 | Milette | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7281859 | Mudd | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284912 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297013 | Caveney | Nov 2007 | B2 |
D558675 | Chien et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7315682 | En Lin | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7325976 | Gurreri | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7325980 | Pepe | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7329137 | Martin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331718 | Yazaki | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347634 | Güenther et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354291 | Caveney | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371082 | Zimmel | May 2008 | B2 |
7387447 | Mudd | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390203 | Murano | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D572661 | En Lin et al. | Jul 2008 | S |
7407330 | Smith | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7431604 | Waters | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7463803 | Cody | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465180 | Kusuda | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472124 | Ricchio | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473124 | Briant | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7500790 | Erdman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510335 | Su | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7513695 | Lin | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7561775 | Lin | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7591595 | Lu | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594766 | Sasser | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7628545 | Cody et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641398 | O'Riorden | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7677812 | Castagna et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695199 | Teo | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699533 | Milette | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7824113 | Wong | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837395 | Lin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
D641708 | Yamauchi | Jul 2011 | S |
8061906 | Nehler et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083450 | Smith | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8186890 | Lu | May 2012 | B2 |
8192091 | Hsu | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202009 | Lin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244089 | Chen | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251733 | Wu | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8267595 | Lin | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8270796 | Nhep | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8406597 | Case | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408815 | Lin | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465317 | Gniadek et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8556646 | Kappla et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8636424 | Kuffel et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8641293 | Lin et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8651749 | Dainese | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8662760 | Cline et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8764308 | Irwin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8770863 | Cooke | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8834038 | Limbert et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858089 | Bradley | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9411110 | Barnette, Jr. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9411111 | Banal, Jr. et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9494744 | de Jong | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9548557 | Liu | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9551842 | Theuerkorn | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9557491 | Takano et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9557495 | Raven et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9568686 | Fewkes | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9568689 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9581768 | Baca | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9588305 | Seki | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9599778 | Wong et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9618702 | Takano et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625658 | Lin | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9658409 | Gniadek et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9684130 | Veatch et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9684313 | Chajec | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9709753 | Chang | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9939589 | Takano et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10156683 | Manes et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10156684 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10191230 | Wong et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10228521 | Gniadek et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10444444 | Ma et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10495823 | Good et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10890723 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
11061190 | Takano et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11181701 | Wong et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11307369 | Takano et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11333836 | Wong et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11340405 | Hendrick | May 2022 | B2 |
11385415 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11415760 | Takano et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11428875 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11525965 | Childers et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11719893 | Higley et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11733466 | Higley et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11808994 | Higley et al. | Nov 2023 | B1 |
11846813 | Childers et al. | Dec 2023 | B2 |
11880075 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2024 | B1 |
11906794 | Higley et al. | Feb 2024 | B2 |
20020172467 | Anderson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030053787 | Lee | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063862 | Fillion | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118293 | Canace et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030147230 | Hutermans et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157825 | Kane | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040043654 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052473 | Seo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062487 | Mickievicz | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078961 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136657 | Ngo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141693 | Szilagyi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161958 | Togami | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040234209 | Cox | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247252 | Ehrenreich et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050111796 | Matasek et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135752 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135753 | Eigenmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136722 | Cairns | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141817 | Yazaki | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050281509 | Cox et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060062527 | Schrodinger | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089049 | Sedor | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060127025 | Haberman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140453 | Geng | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140543 | Abendschein | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160429 | Dawiedczyk | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060269194 | Luther | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274411 | Yamauchi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070028409 | Yamada | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070079854 | You | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098329 | Shimoji | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149062 | Long | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070230874 | Lin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232115 | Burke | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243749 | Wu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080008430 | Kewitsch | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037938 | Kiani et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044137 | Luther | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080069501 | Mudd | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101757 | Lin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144303 | Ice | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226237 | O'Riorden | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260333 | Roth | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267566 | En Lin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080310800 | Shibata | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090022457 | de Jong | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028507 | Jones | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090092360 | Lin | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090196555 | Lin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214162 | O'Riorden | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220197 | Gniadek | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090290938 | Asaoka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100034502 | Lu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100239220 | Lin | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100247041 | Szilagyi | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100284656 | Morra et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322561 | Lin | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019962 | Childers et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110044588 | Larson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058773 | Peterhans | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091159 | de Jong et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110131801 | Nelson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177710 | Tobey | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110299814 | Nakagawa | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120057824 | Katoh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057826 | Katoh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082416 | Katoh | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099822 | Kuffel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120141072 | Katagiyama et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155810 | Nakagawa | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177326 | Peng et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189260 | Kowalczyk | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120213484 | Childers et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237177 | Minota | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120269485 | Haley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120301080 | Gniadek | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130071067 | Lin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130089995 | Gniadek | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094816 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130121653 | Shitama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122745 | Soubh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130183012 | Cabanne Lopez | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130259429 | Czosnowski | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130308916 | Buff | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130322825 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130322826 | Henke et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140016901 | Lambourn | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140023322 | Gniadek | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140050446 | Chang | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140133808 | Hill | May 2014 | A1 |
20140219621 | Barnette, Jr. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226946 | Cooke | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241678 | Bringuier | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241688 | Isenhour | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241689 | Bradley et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140331464 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334780 | Nguyen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140348477 | Chang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150111417 | Vanderwoud | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150301294 | Chang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150331201 | Takano | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355417 | Takano | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150378113 | Good | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160116685 | Wong | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160131849 | Takano | May 2016 | A1 |
20160161680 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160172852 | Tamura | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160178850 | Nhep | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160195682 | Takano | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160231512 | Seki | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160238796 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259135 | Gniadek | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160266326 | Gniadek | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291262 | Chang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320572 | Gniadek | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327756 | Raven et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170003458 | Gniadek | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170153879 | George et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170205587 | Chang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170205588 | Lee | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170205590 | Bailey | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170227720 | Lin | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170343740 | Nguyen | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170351037 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170363818 | Suzic | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180011258 | Takano et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180106972 | Liu et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180156988 | Gniadek et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180217339 | Ma et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180217340 | Wong et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180224608 | Liu et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180252872 | Chen | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190018201 | Takano et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190018209 | Takano et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190204513 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190243072 | Takano et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200285005 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210099229 | Cox et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20230213709 | Higley et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230393351 | Childers et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2495693 | Apr 2004 | CA |
2836038 | Nov 2006 | CN |
201383588 | Jan 2010 | CN |
201740886 | Feb 2011 | CN |
202600189 | Dec 2012 | CN |
202006011910 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102006019335 | Oct 2007 | DE |
1074868 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1211537 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1211537 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1245980 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1566674 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2111240 | Jun 1983 | GB |
2573482 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2001305391 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2004-354693 | Dec 2004 | JP |
3886610 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2009229545 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009276493 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2012-53375 | Mar 2012 | JP |
20160134234 | Jul 2016 | JP |
200821653 | May 2008 | TW |
WO2001079904 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO2001079904 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO2004027485 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2008112986 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2009135787 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2010024851 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2012136702 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO2012162385 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2012174227 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO2013100892 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2014028527 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014057264 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014182351 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO2015027033 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO2015191024 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO2016148741 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO2017127208 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO2019126337 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO2002042818 | May 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2017/064643, dated May 3, 2021, 15 pages. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2015 for EP 14187661. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 19, 2015 for EP 14168005. |
“Fiber Optic Connectors and Assemblies Catalog” 2009, Huber & Suhner Fiver Optics, Herisau, Switzerland, www.hubersuhner.com. |
“Fiber Optic Interconnect Solutions, Tactical Fiber Optical Connectors, Cables and Termini” 2006, Glenair, Inc., Glendale, California, www.mps-electronics.de. |
“Fiber Optic Products Catalog” Nov. 2007, Tyco Electronics Corporation, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, www.ampnetconnect.com. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 27, 2012 for PCT/US2011/058799. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2012 for PCT/US2012/039126. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 16, 2014 for PCT/US2013/54784. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 9, 2014 for PCT/US2014/041500. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2014 for PCT/US2014/012137. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2008 for PCT/US2008/057023. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 22, 2016 from related International Application No. PCT/US2015/059458, International Filing Date Nov. 6, 2015. |
International Search Report dated May 19, 2019 for PCT/US2016/028266. |
ISR WO2014028527ISR Feb. 20, 2014. |
ISR WO2015US57610ISR Jan. 21, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2018/015733, dated Aug. 8, 2019, pp. 9. |
International Search Report (ISR) WO2008112986 dated Sep. 15, 2009. |
ISR WO2012162385ISR Nov. 29, 2012. |
ISR WO2014028527ISR Jul. 16, 2015. |
ISR WO2015191024ISR Oct. 9, 2014. |
ISR WO2015US57610ISR Sep. 22, 2016. |
ISR WO2016176083ISR May 19, 2016. |
ISR WO2016148741ISR Sep. 22, 2016. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,340,413, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00118, U.S. Pat. No. 11,340,413, dated Dec. 21, 2023, 131pgs. |
Fibermart, “Fiber Optic Connector Tutorial,” accessed on the internet at https://www.fiber-mart.com/news/fiber-optic-connector-tutorial-a-848.html, retrieved Dec. 21, 2023, 5pgs. |
“Fiber Optic Rack Mount Enclosure, 3-Panel 1 RMS,” accessed on the internet at https://www.computercablestore.com/fiber-optic-rack-mount-enclosure-3-panel-1-rms, retrieved Dec. 21, 2023, 4pgs. |
Liteon, “19-Inch Rack,” accessed on the internet at https://liteon-cips.com/products/racks/19-inch-rack/, retrieved Dec. 21, 2023, 5pgs. |
Wagner et al., “SC-DC/SC-QC fiber optic connector,” Opt. Eng., 37(12) 3129-3133, Dec. 1998. |
Wenke, “Report On Fiber Optic Cables,” Optical Communication ONT, Hochschule Bremen, City University of Applied Sciences, pp. 1-30, Dec. 18, 2015. |
Kant, “Data center evolution A tutorial on state of the art, issues, and challenges,” Computer Networks, 53:2939-2965, 2009. |
Curran et al. “Basics of Fiber Optics,” Amphenol Fiber Systems International, pp. 1-13, dated no later than Jan. 11, 2024. |
Nishimura et al., “High-Density Multi-Fiber Connectors for Optical Interconnection,” Furukawa Review, 34:13-16, Aug. 29, 2008. |
Gurreri et al., “ Multi-Fiber, MT Ferrule Endface Fiber Tip Displacement Model for Physical Contact Interconnects,” 2006, pp. 1-12. |
Declaration of James F. Brennan III, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,340,413, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00118, U.S. Pat. No. 11,340,413, dated Dec. 21, 2023, 294pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,191,230, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00120, U.S. Pat. No. 10,191,230 B2, dated Dec. 22, 2023, 177pgs. |
“HDI-45 connector,” accessed on the internet at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDI-45_connector, retrieved Dec. 22, 2023, 4pgs. |
Google Data Centers gallery, accessed on the internet at https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/gallery/, retrieved Dec. 24, 2023, 83pgs. |
Order Staying Case, Senko Advanced Components, Inc. vs. US Conec Ltd., In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, C.A. No. 23-083 (JPM), Jul. 6, 2023, 2pgs. |
Kordz, “RJ45 CAT6 Field Termination Connector & & Strain Relief,” Technical Data Sheet, kordz.com, 2019, 2pgs. |
“Machine Design—An Integrated Approach,” 3rd Edition, Pearson College Div, Jan. 1, 2005, 93pgs. |
Declaration of William Singhose, PH.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,191,230, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00120, U.S. Pat. No. 10,191,230 B2, dated Dec. 19, 2023, 342pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00805, U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415, dated Apr. 12, 2024, 207pgs. |
Scheduling Order, Senko Advanced Components, Inc. vs. US Conec Ltd., In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 1:23-cv-00083-JPM, Mar. 12, 2024, 9pgs. |
Declaration of Edward Lurie, Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Petitioner v. US Conec Ltd., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00805, U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415, dated Apr. 11, 2024, 386pgs. |
Provisional Application 61-789,499, filed Mar. 15, 2013, 32pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,181,701, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00121, U.S. Pat. No. 11,181,701, dated Dec. 28, 2023, 112pgs. |
“Maelstrom (ride),” Wikipedia, accessed on the internet at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maelstrom_(ride), retrieved Dec. 27, 2023, 3pgs. |
Declaration of William Singhose, PH.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,181,701, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00121, U.S. Pat. No. 11,181,701, dated Dec. 27, 2023, 330pgs. |
“Fiber Optic adapter/Coupler Tutorial,” accessed on the internet at https://community.fs.com/article/fiber-optic-adaptercoupler-tutorial.html, retrieved Dec. 21, 2023, 4pgs. |
“What Is Optical Fiber Technology, and How Does It Work?,” accessed on the internet at https://www.nai-group.com/optical-fiber-technology-how-it-works/, retrieved Dec. 21, 2023, 8pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,333,836, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00117, U.S. Pat. No. 11,333,836, dated Dec. 30, 2023, 131pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/546,920, filed Aug. 17, 2017, 76pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/458,042, filed Feb. 13, 2017, 22pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/463,898, filed Feb. 27, 2017, 87pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/457,150, filed Feb. 9, 2017, 76pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/463,901, filed Feb. 27, 2017, 87pgs. |
Moxel Adaptor, dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 1pg. |
Hendrick, “Interface Specification for MDC Receptacle,” Feb. 6, 2020, 7pgs. |
8961, PH.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00117, U.S. Pat. No. 11,333,836, 225pgs. |
Fiberoad, “ QSFP-DD releases Interface Specification,” accessed on the internet at https://fiberroad.com/400g-qsfpdd-dco-standards/, retrieved Dec. 30, 2023, 3pgs. |
Cabling, “QSFP-DD MSA Group intros new specs, plus white paper,” accessed on the internet at https://www.cablinginstall.com/standards/article/14203903/qsfp-dd-msa-group-intros-new-specs-plus-white-paper, retrieved Dec. 30, 2023, 3pgs. |
Lightwave, “QSFP-DD MSA Group offers rev 6.0 specifications for QSFPDDS00, QSFP112,” accessed on the internet at https://www.lightwaveonline.com/optical- tech/transmission/article/14204021/qsfp-dd-msa-group-offers-rev-60-specifications-for-qsfp-dd800-qsfp112, retrieved Dec. 30, 2023, 4pgs. |
Jenkins et al., “Controlling Human Perception of Haptic Profiles Using Contextual Cues,” 2023 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), WHC 2023, Delft, Netherlands, Jul. 10-13, 2023, pp. 1-7. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,415,760, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00119, U.S. Pat. No. 11,415,760, dated Jan. 3, 2024, 126pgs. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to the Petition for Inter Partes Review, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00119, U.S. Pat. No. 11,415,760, dated Apr. 18, 2024, 42pgs. |
Assignment of U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,414, Takano, Gniadek to Senko Advanced Components, Inc., dated Jan. 15, 2016, 3pgs. |
Assignment of U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,414, Wong, Ruffner to Senko Advanced Components, Inc., dated Apr. 23, 2015, 8pgs. |
Declaration of Eric Pearson, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00119, U.S. Pat. No. 11,415,760, dated Apr. 17, 2024, 35pgs. |
The New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd ed., Cover and Bibliographic pages, p. 1596 “Slickenslide—Slip,” 2005, 4pgs. |
Meriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed., Cover and Bibliographic pages, p. 1172 “sleep—slider,” 2012, 4pgs. |
Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd ed., p. 2364, “Slick-Slight,” 1947, 4pgs. |
Satake, “The History of the MT and its Variations,” accessed on the internet at IEEE Xplore, retrieved Oct. 30, 2023, 2pgs. |
Nissin Kasei USA Corp., “MPO Connector Kit, Product Specifications,” dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 9pgs. |
Furukawa Electric, “MT Ferrules,” accessed on the internet at https://www.furukawa.eo.jp/telecom/en/product/connector/product/mt.html#:- :text=MT ferrules are key components, wealth of technology and experience., retrieved Nov. 1, 2023, 4pgs. |
OCC, “18 Port Rack Mount Fiber Enclosure,” accessed on the internet at https://www.computercablestore.com/18-port-rack-mount-fiber-enclosure, retrieved Dec. 18, 2023, 4pgs. |
“Rack unit,” accessed on the internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rack_unit, retrieved Oct. 24, 2023, 5pgs. |
Declaration of James F. Brennan III, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00119, U.S. Pat. No. 11,415,760, dated Jan. 3, 2024, 281pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00122, U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, dated Jan. 4, 2024, 147pgs. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to the Petition for Inter Partes Review, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00122, U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, dated Mar. 27, 2024, 93pgs. |
International Standard, “Fibre optic interconnecting devices and passive components—Fibre optic connector interfaces—Part 20: Type LC connector family,” Ed. 2.0, Apr. 2012, 30pgs. |
Senko, “The Importance of Proper Crimping in Fiber Optic Assemblies,” Application Note, Rev. 01, pp. 1-9, Feb. 2021. |
Buijs, Marcel, Fiber Optic Center, “Proper Crimping Techniques are Critical When Terminating Fiber Optic Connectors,” FOC Blogs, accessed on the internet https://focenter.com/blog/proper-crimping-techniques-are-critical-when-terminating-fiber-optic-connectors, retrieved Feb. 20, 2024, 7pgs. |
Bulgin, “Terminating and crimping for fiber optics:methods and tips,” Nov. 25, 2019, accessed on the internet https://community.element14.com/products/manufacturers/bulgin/b/blog/posts/terminating-and-crimping-for-fiber-optics-methods-and-tips, retrieved Feb. 20, 2024, 4pgs. |
Cambridge English Dictionary, “Meaning of elongate in English,” accessed on the internet https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/elongate, retrieved Feb. 20, 2024, 8pgs. |
Declaration of Eric Pearson, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00122, U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, dated Mar. 26, 2024, 115pgs. |
Leviton, “Application Note: Understanding Duplex Polarity,” 2020, 3pgs. |
L-com Fiber Coupler, LC Duplex Bronze Sleeve, Low Profile (Sku_ FOA-802), dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 1pg. |
Huber+Suhner LC-XD Connector, dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 2pgs. |
PolyPhaser Fiber Optic Patch Cord Duplex Uniboot LC to LC Single Mode Fiber, OFNR, Yellow 3.0mm Jacket, 5m (Sku_ FPC2LCLC-USMRY30-05), dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 2pgs. |
Universal LC Fiber Cable—Singlemode 9_125—Plenum 4M with Uniboot LC Connectors (SKU_FODULC- SNG-4m), dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024, 10pgs. |
Declaration of James F. Brennan III, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, IPR2024-00122, dated Jan. 4, 2024, 271pgs. |
Petition [1 of 2] for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369 [Claims 1-22], US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00115, U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, dated Jan. 6, 2024, 121pgs. |
Petition [2 of 2] for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369 [Claims 23-40], US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00116, U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, dated Jan. 6, 2024, 126pgs. |
Declaration of James F. Brennan III, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 23-40 of U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00116, U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, dated Jan. 5, 2024, 257pgs. |
Declaration of James F. Brennan III, Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-22 of U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, US Conec Ltd., Petitioner v. Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00115, U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, dated Jan. 5, 2024, 256pgs. |
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, US Conect Ltd.V. Senko Advanced Components Inc, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-00122, U.S. Pat. No. 11,061,190, Jun. 5, 2024, 23 pages. |
White Paper: SC-RJ—Reliability for Every Category, 2008, 14 pages. |
Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466, Senko Advanced Components v. US Conec LTD, Case PGR2024-00032, May 21, 2024, 242 pages. |
Declaration of Edward Lurie, Senko Advanced Components v. US Conec LTD, Case PGR2024-00032, U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466, May 19, 2024, 310 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/532,710, filed Jul. 14, 2017, 79 pages. |
QSFP-DD Hardware Specification, Sep. 19, 2017, 69 pages. |
TIA/EI Standard, FOCIS 10 Fiber Optic Connector Intermateability Standard—Type LC, 2002, 38 pages CS Connector, May 20, 2024, 8 pages. |
CS Connector, May 20, 2024, 8 pages. |
Exhibit I, US Conec EX1007, IPR2024-00116, U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,369, , dated no later than Apr. 22, 2024; 4pgs. |
BSI Standards Publication, Fibre Optic Interconnecting Devices and Components, Part 24, Jan. 2010, 32pgs. |
INTL Standard 61754-4 ed1.2b Connector interfaces SC connector, Mar. 2002, 92pgs. |
Declaration of Edward M. Cady, Jr., Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Petitioner v. US Conec Ltd., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-01074, U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075, dated Jun. 19, 2024, 258pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075, Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Petitioner v. US Conec Ltd., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case IPR2024-01074, U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075, dated Jun. 20, 2024, 159pgs. |
Representative Claim Chart Showing Infringement of U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075, Mar. 22, 2024, 67pgs. |
Declaration of Edward Lurie, Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Petitioner v. US Conec Ltd., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case PGR2024-00037, U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794, dated Jun. 14, 2024, 311pgs. |
Petition for Post-Grant Review of U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794, Senko Advanced Components, Inc., Petitioner v. US Conec Ltd., Patent Owner, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case PGR2024-00037, U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794, dated Jun. 20, 2024, 270pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/649,539, filed Mar. 28, 2018, 209pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/640,914, filed Mar. 9, 2018, 41pgs. |
Senko Advanced Components, “The Importance of Proper Cleaving for Fiber Optic Connectors,” Application Engineering Note, Feb. 2022, 10pgs. |
Thorlabs, Guide to Connectorization and Polishing Optical Fibers, FN96A, Apr. 17, 2013, 36pgs. |
Designerdata Polypropylene, accessed on the internet at https://designerdata.nl/materials/plastics/thermo-plastics/polypropylene-(cop.)?cookie=YES, retrieved Apr. 28, 2024, 2pgs. |
Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene, INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, accessed on the internet at www.ineos-op.com, Apr. 2014, 2pgs. |
The Engineering ToolBox: Polymers, accessed on the internet at https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/polymer-properties-d_1222.html, retrieved Apr. 28, 2024, 9pgs. |
Omnexus Plastics & Elastomers, accessed on the internet at https://omnexus.specialchem.com/polymer-property/young-modulus, retrieved Apr. 28, 2024, 14pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/793,198, filed Jan. 16, 2019, 55pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/653,706, filed Apr. 6, 2018, 19pgs. |
Exhibit A-1—U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 55pgs. |
Exhibit A-2—U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 43pgs. |
Exhibit A-3—U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 49pgs. |
Exhibit A-4—U.S. Pat. No. 11,733,466 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 37pgs. |
Exhibit B-1—U.S. Pat. No. 11,808,994 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 38pgs. |
Exhibit B-2—U.S. Pat. No. 11,808,994 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 64pgs. |
Exhibit B-3—U.S. Pat. No. 11,808,994 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 68pgs. |
Exhibit B-4—U.S. Pat. No. 11,808,994 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 53pgs. |
Exhibit C-1—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 105pgs. |
Exhibit C-2—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 98pgs. |
Exhibit C-3—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 105pgs. |
Exhibit C-4—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 33pgs. |
Exhibit C-5—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 39pgs. |
Exhibit C-6—U.S. Pat. No. 11,906,794 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 22pgs. |
Exhibit D-1—U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 90pgs. |
Exhibit D-2—U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 91pgs. |
Exhibit D-3—U.S. Pat. No. 11,880,075 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 86pgs. |
Exhibit E-1—U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 50pgs. |
Exhibit E-2—U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 25pgs. |
Exhibit E-3—U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 57pgs. |
Exhibit E-4—U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 57pgs. |
Exhibit E-5—U.S. Pat. No. 11,385,415 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 8pgs. |
Exhibit F-1—U.S. Pat. No. 10,495,823 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 29pgs. |
Exhibit F-2—U.S. Pat. No. 10,495,823 Invalidity Claim Chart, Jun. 21, 2024, 26pgs. |
Exhibit G—Other Validity Grounds (Non-Prior Art), Jun. 21, 2024, 54pgs. |
Molex Incorporated, HBMT Motherboard Adapter, Oct. 31, 2005, 2pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230333330 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62546920 | Aug 2017 | US | |
62457150 | Feb 2017 | US | |
62452147 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62430560 | Dec 2016 | US | |
62430067 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17581949 | Jan 2022 | US |
Child | 18212721 | US | |
Parent | 16988581 | Aug 2020 | US |
Child | 17581949 | US | |
Parent | 16297614 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 16988581 | US | |
Parent | 15720980 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16297614 | US |