A resonator-fiber-optic gyroscope (RFOG) is a rotation rate measurement apparatus that uses a fiber ring resonant cavity to enhance the signal to noise ratio in the measurement of rotation-induced Sagnac effect within the resonant cavity. The basic principle of RFOG operation is that the effective resonator path length in a clockwise (CW) and counter-clockwise (CCW) direction is different when the rotation of the fiber ring resonant cavity has a nonzero component in a resonator axis. By measuring the CW and CCW resonance frequency difference, which is proportional to Sagnac phase shift due to rotation, the RFOG can accurately measure the rotation rate.
Lasers provide coherent light to the fiber resonator to identify its resonance frequencies. Semiconductor lasers are a low cost option for source lasers. However, semiconductor lasers typically have significant phase noise that can lead to degradation of the RFOG performance.
The present application relates to an optical-fiber filter. The optical-fiber filter includes an optical fiber having a first end-face and an opposing second end-face. The first end-face and the second end-face set a fiber length. The first end-face and the second end-face are coated with reflective coatings. When an optical beam emitted from a laser is coupled into one of the first end-face or the second end-face, an optical beam output from the opposing end-face has a narrow linewidth and low frequency noise fluctuations.
The details of various embodiments of the claimed invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
In order for laser diodes to be used in a resonator-fiber-optic gyroscope (RFOG) without degrading performance, the phase noise of lasers must be reduced. Embodiments of the resonator-fiber-optic gyroscopes described herein include a frequency stabilized reference laser to provide a reference optical beam with low phase noise for the RFOG system. The lasers (slaves) that are used for measuring the resonance frequency of the sensing resonator are phase locked with a servo to the reference (master) laser so that the low phase noise of the master laser within the servo bandwidth is transferred to the slave lasers. The master laser is frequency stabilized by using a frequency discriminator in a negative feedback loop that controls out the phase/frequency fluctuations of the master laser. Thus, the slave lasers have low noise within the bandwidth of the electro-optic servo.
The embodiments of the resonator-fiber-optic gyroscopes described herein include optical-fiber filters coupled to receive output from each slave laser. The optical-fiber filters reduce the remaining phase noise of each laser; namely phase fluctuations at higher frequencies than the servo bandwidth. Outputs from the optical-fiber filters are used to probe the resonances of the fiber resonator coil (gyro sensing coil). The optical-fiber filters have the desired features needed for high performance rotation measurement by the RFOG. These desired features include very narrow bandwidth, small size, high power handling capability, low spurious back reflections, manufacturability, tunability, and potential for low cost. The optical-fiber filter described herein is a very high finesse, narrow linewidth, and low cost filter.
As shown in
The optical beam 310 that is output from the opposing second end-face 114 through the reflective coating 136 has a narrow linewidth and low frequency noise fluctuations. In one implementation of this embodiment, the finesse of the resonator cavity formed by the reflective coating 135 and reflective coating 136 is 1000 and the length of the fiber is approximately 5 meters and the linewidth of the optical beam 310 is 20 KHz. In another implementation of this embodiment, the finesse of the resonator cavity formed by the reflective coating 135 and reflective coating 136 is 200 and the length of the fiber is approximately 5 meters and the linewidth of the optical beam 310 is 100 KHz. In one implementation of this embodiment, the reflective coating 135 and reflective coating 136 are Bragg gratings written within the fiber to produce the desired reflectivity.
The optical-fiber filter 100 is bidirectional, so when an optical beam 300 emitted from a laser 201 is coupled into either the first end-face 112 or the second end-face 114, an optical beam output 310 from the opposing end-face has a narrow linewidth and low frequency noise fluctuations.
In the optical-fiber filter 100, the angle of the end-face cleave must be specified to promote the multiple reflections within the fiber 110 (typically, 90 degrees with respect to the core of the fiber), and the length L of the fiber, the reflectivities R1 and R2 of the coatings, and the mode field size and numerical aperture (NA) of the fiber must be selected to: 1) reduce the possibility of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering and other non-linear effects; 2) allow the desired power throughput; 3) achieve the desired filter linewidth; and 4) allow for the desired packaging bend diameter. The divergence angle θ of the optical beam 310 and the index of refraction n of the optical fiber 110 are used to calculate the numerical aperture NA, which is NA=n sin θ, where n is the refractive index of the medium outside the optical filter. The reflectivities R1 and R2 each represent the ratio of the light intensity reflected (from the surfaces) to the intensity of light incident on that surface.
As shown in
The coatings 131 and 132 are typically a dielectric stack designed for the desired transmission and reflection with low loss. The desired coatings 131 and 131 are low loss, highly reflective mirrors with a small amount of transmission, so that light incident on the input end-face 171 and the output end-face 172 is mostly reflected back into the fiber to produce a resonator. The small coefficient of transmission allows some light to be coupled into and out of the fiber resonator 100 or 101. As shown in
The resonator round-trip path length 2L is uniquely defined as the path length from the first fiber end-face 112, through the fiber 110 or 111 to the second coated fiber end-face 114, and back through the fiber 110 or 111 to the first fiber end-face 112. This provides for maximum stability of the optical-fiber filter 100 or 101. The longer the optical-fiber filter is, the narrower (smaller) the linewidth of the output optical beam. High finesse and narrow linewidth are desirable conditions to provide an optical-fiber filter (low pass filter) with a low cutoff frequency. The lower the cutoff frequency of the filter is, the lower the laser frequency noise. In summary, the higher the finesse and the narrower the linewidth, the lower the corner frequency and the more effective the optical-fiber filter is at reducing laser frequency noise. The transfer function for passing frequency noise fluctuations looks like that of a low pass electrical filter, where the filter does not reduce frequencies below its corner frequency, but rolls off, or progressively attenuates frequencies further and further beyond its corner frequency. The corner frequency is proportional to its linewidth.
The optical fibers 110 (
The limits of an exemplary optical-fiber filter 101 designed to prevent generation of non-linear effects are now described. The exemplary fiber 111 in the optical-fiber filter 101 is a polarization maintaining (PM) fiber with a loss of 60 ppm/meter and a mode field diameter of 10.6μ. The power threshold at which the SBS begins (Pcrit Brill) is related to the physical area of the fiber core, A, in m2; the fiber loss, α, in m−1; and the gain coefficient of the guiding medium, GB, in m/Watt; and the length L of the fiber in meters. Specifically, Pcrit Brill is calculated based on the following equation, where “*” is representative of the multiplicative sign: Pcrit Brill=21*[(α*Aeff)/(ρ*gB*(1−e−(αL))]. For a nominal 10 meter polarization maintaining fiber 111 in which the loss α is 0.25 dB/km (˜60 ppm/m), the fraction ρ of power in glass is 1 (i.e., for a solid core), the SBS gain GB is 5×10−11 meters/Watt (for silica), and a fiber mode field area is 8.8×10−11 meters2, the power threshold for SBS, Pcrit Brill, is 3.7 Watts.
Table 1 shows the finesse, output power, and circulating power as a function of length L of the PM fiber 111 for a 200 KHz optical-fiber filter 101 with 200 kHz full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) peaks in the Airy function. Table 1 also shows the transmission (T) of the reflective coating. The circulating power column lists power circulating in the resonant filter in terms of unity input; the circulating power (W) column gives the circulating power in Watts, which is useful in estimating Brillouin threshold, based on an input of 60 mW.
When a 60 mW laser beam is coupled into the exemplary optical-fiber filter 101 described above, the circulating power does not exceed the Brillouin threshold for the lengths of fiber shown in Table 1 (e.g., less than 5 meters). The output and circulating powers shown in Table 1 are normalized to unity input power. The circulating power in watts assumes 60 mW input power.
The frequency stabilized master laser 200 emits a reference optical beam 308. The reference optical beam 308 has low phase noise (e.g., less than 1 Hz/√Hz). The beam 308 is used to generate radio frequency (RF) beat signals between the master and slave lasers, which are used by phase locked loop (PLL) 250 (also referred to herein as “multi-laser frequency control 250”) to lock the slave lasers 121, 122, and 123 to the master laser 200 with frequency separations determined by the resonance tracking servos 251. These beat signals are used by multi-laser frequency control 250, which receives feedback from resonance tracking servos 251, to precisely control the frequency of the optical beams of the respective slave lasers 121, 122, and 123.
The slave lasers 121, 122, and 123 have similar structure and function to the slave laser 120 shown in
The optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103 are arranged so that the respective output optical beams 307-1, 307-2, and 307-3 emitted from the slave lasers 121, 122, and 123 are coupled to the respective optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103. The optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103 output low-noise, coherent optical beams 310-1, 310-2, and 310-3, respectively. The low-noise, coherent optical beams 310-1, 310-2, and 310-3 are coupled into respective intensity modulators 320-1, 320-2, and 320-3. As is known in the art, as the frequency noise of an optical beam is reduced, the coherence of the optical beam is increased.
The fiber resonator coil 240 is an optical fiber that has a first coil end-face represented generally at 241 and a second coil end-face represented generally at 242. The low-noise, coherent optical beams 310-1 and 310-3 output from the optical-fiber filters 101 and 103 are coupled to the first coil end-face 241 of the fiber resonator coil 240 via the respective intensity modulators 320-1 and 320-3. The low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-2 output from the optical-fiber filter 102 is coupled to the second coil end-face 242 of the fiber resonator coil 240 via the intensity modulator 320-2.
The optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103 each comprises an optical fiber 111 having a first end-face 112 and an opposing second end-face 114. The first end-face 112 and the second end-face 114 are coated with reflective coatings 131 and 132, respectively. In one implementation of this embodiment, the optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103 are similar in structure and function to the optical-fiber filter 100 shown in
The optical beam 307-1 emitted from the first slave laser 121 is coupled to the first end-face 112 of the first optical-fiber filter 101. A first low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-1 is output from the second end-face 114 of the first optical-fiber filter 101 and is coupled (via the intensity modulator 320-1 and optical elements including beam splitters 271, 272(1-2) and lens 270-1) to the first coil end-face 241 of the fiber resonator coil 240. Other coupling configurations of optical elements are possible as is understandable to one skilled in the art. The portion of the optical beam 310-1 coupled into the fiber resonator coil 240 at the first coil end-face 241 propagates through the fiber resonator coil 240 in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction.
The optical beam 307-2 emitted from the second slave laser 122 is coupled to the first end-face 112 of the second optical-fiber filter 102. A second low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-2 is output from the second end-face 114 of the second optical-fiber filter 102 and is coupled (via the intensity modulator 320-2 and optical elements including beam splitters 272(3-4) and lens 270-2) to the second coil end-face 242 of the fiber resonator coil 240. The portion of the optical beam 310-2 coupled into the fiber resonator coil 240 at the second coil end-face 242 propagates through the fiber resonator coil 240 in a clockwise (CW) direction.
The optical beam 307-3 emitted from the third slave laser 131 is coupled to the first end-face 112 of the third optical-fiber filter 103. A third low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-3 is output from the second end-face 114 of the third optical-fiber filter 103 and is coupled (via the intensity modulator 320-3 and optical elements including the beam splitters 272(1-2) and lens 270-1) to the first coil end-face 241 of the fiber resonator coil 240. The portion of the optical beam 310-3 coupled into the fiber resonator coil 240 at the first coil end-face 241 propagates through the fiber resonator coil 240 in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction. In one implementation of this embodiment, the lenses 270(1-2) are ball lenses.
The light coupled into the fiber resonator coil 240 circulates multiple times within the fiber resonator coil 240 by transit through the lenses 270-1 and 270-2 and the beam splitters 272-2, 272-5, and 272-4. A portion (e.g., 1 to 20%) of the light propagating in the clockwise (CW) direction is reflected by beam splitter 272-5 into the detector (PD1CW) 261. A portion (e.g., 1 to 20%) of the light propagating in the counter-clockwise (CCW) direction is reflected by beam splitter 272-5 into the detector (PD2CCW) 262. Information indicative of the amount of optical power detected at the detectors 261 and 262 is sent as signals to the resonance tracking servos 251 and to the DC power servo 254. The resonance tracking servos 251 send signals to the multi-laser frequency control 250, which adjust the frequency of the optical beams of the slave lasers 121, 122, and 123, as needed, to resonance peaks of the sensing resonator 240. The DC power servo 254 sends signals to the summation circuit (Σ) 281 to adjust the power of the optical beam 310-2 output from the optical-fiber filter 102 through the intensity modulator (IM) 320-2. This adjustment is done in order to balance the power in CW and CCW direction so that optical Kerr effect induced cavity length difference is minimized.
The exemplary RFOG 10 shown in
The exemplary RFOG 10 shown in
The exemplary RFOG 10 shown in
The exemplary RFOG 10 shown in
As shown in
A similar arrangement is possible to couple the optical beams 310-2 and 310-3 output from the optical-fiber filters 102 and 103, respectively, to fiber pigtails of the intensity modulators 320-2 and 320-3, respectively, via silicon substrates (not shown). For example, a third ball lens (not shown) and a fourth ball lens (not shown) can be configured to collimate the low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-2 propagating there between.
In another implementation of this embodiment, the second end-face 114 of the first optical-fiber filter 101 is positioned in a third groove 297 in the silicon optical bench 150; the second end-face 114 of the second optical-fiber filter 102 is positioned in a fourth groove 298 in the silicon optical bench 150; and the second end-face 114 of the third optical-fiber filter 103 is positioned in a fifth groove 299 in the silicon optical bench 150. In one implementation of this embodiment, an integrated silicon optical bench is used to align optical beam outputs from the optical-fiber filters 101, 102, and 103 to the intensity modulators 320-1, 320-2, and 320-3, respectively, and to align the output of the intensity modulators 320-1, 320-2, and 320-3 to the fiber resonator coil 240.
In yet another implementation of this embodiment, only one optically transparent ball lens 161 is positioned in an etched region in the silicon optical bench 150. In another implementation of this embodiment, the first ball lens 161 and the second ball lens 162 are positioned in two separate etched regions of the silicon optical bench 150 and/or 151. In this manner, at least one optically transparent ball lens 161 couples the optical beams 310-1, 310-2, and/or 310-3 output from a second end-face 114 of at least one of the optical-fiber filters 101, 102 and/or 103, respectively, to at least one respective coil end-face 241, 242, or 241, respectively, of the fiber resonator coil 240.
Thus, silicon optical benches 151 and/or 150 include grooves (e.g., grooves 297-299, 152, 152, and/or etched regions 155) to position optical elements (e.g., first ball lens 161, second ball lens 162, beam splitters 271, 272(1-5), and/or lens 270(1-2)), which align and direct at least two low-noise, coherent optical beams (e.g., 310(1-3)) output from the at least two optical-fiber filters (e.g., 101-103) to the first coil end-face 241 and the second coil end-face 242 and between the first coil end-face 241 and the second coil end-face 242. Housing the fiber resonator coil 240 on a silicon optical bench 150 provides a low cost implementation of the RFOG 10.
At block 502, an optical beam 308 emitted from a master laser 200 is used to control at least one slave laser 121. The at least one slave laser 121 is locked to the master laser 200. The three slave lasers 121, 122, and 123 are locked to the master laser 200 with frequency separations determined by the resonance tracking servos 251. As shown in
At block 504, an optical beam 307 emitted from the at least one slave laser 121 is coupled to a respective at least one optical-fiber filter 101. Specifically, the optical beam 307 output from the at least one slave laser 120 is coupled to the first end-face 112 of the respective at least one optical-fiber filter 101.
As shown in
At block 506, at least one low-noise, coherent optical beam 310 is output from the respective at least one optical-fiber filter 101. As shown in
At block 508, the at least one low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-1 output from the second end-face 114 of the at least one optical-fiber filter 101 is coupled to at least one of two coil end-faces (such as, first coil end-face 241 and second coil end-face 242) of a fiber resonator coil 240 that has resonance frequencies that are sensitive to rotation rate.
As shown in
Likewise,
Likewise,
In one implementation of this embodiment, the first coil end-face 241 is positioned in a first groove 295 in a silicon optical bench 150 and a second coil end-face 242 is positioned in a second groove 296 in the silicon optical bench 150.
In another implementation of this embodiment, the first low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-1 is coupled to the first coil end-face 241 positioned in a first groove 295 in the silicon optical bench 150 via at least one ball lens 161 positioned in a first etched region 155 of the silicon optical bench 150; the second low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-2 is coupled to the second coil end-face 242 positioned in the second groove 296 in the silicon optical bench 150 via at least one ball lens 161 positioned in a second etched region 155 of the silicon optical bench 155; and the third low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-3 is coupled to the first coil end-face 241 positioned in the first groove 295 in the silicon optical bench 150 via at least one ball lens 161 positioned in a third etched region 299 of the silicon optical bench 155. In some embodiments of this latter configuration, there is no third low-noise, coherent optical beam 310-3 and no ball lens 161 positioned in a third etched region 299.
In yet another implementation of this embodiment, the intensity modulation function is done directly on the optical-fiber filter 101, 102 and 103. In embodiments of this latter case, the second end-face 114 of the first optical-fiber filter 101 is positioned in a third groove 297 in the silicon optical bench 150, the second end-face 114 of the second optical-fiber filter 102 is positioned in a fourth groove 298 in the silicon optical bench 150, and the second end-face 114 of the third optical-fiber filter 103 is positioned in a fifth groove 299 in the silicon optical bench 150. In some embodiments of this latter configuration, there is no third optical-fiber filter 103 is positioned in a fifth groove 299.
In this manner, an inexpensive RFOG system uses low cost laser diodes and improves optical filtering (by use of the optical-fiber filters) to reduce the phase noise of the laser diodes, so the low cost RFOG system has an improved performance. In one implementation of this embodiment, the optical-fiber filter 100 or 101 is used in a system that includes a single laser and a frequency shifter.
A number of embodiments of the invention defined by the following claims have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This invention was made with Government support under N00014-08-C-0665 awarded by Office of Naval Research. The Government has certain rights in the invention.