1. The Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to semiconductor laser diodes used in optical fiber communication systems, and more particularly to the frequency modulation of such laser diodes for coding data being transmitted within such fiber optic communication systems, including chirp-managed directly modulated lasers.
2. The Relevant Technology
Optical communication systems based on frequency shift keying require lasers that can generate optical frequency modulation (FM) with high efficiency and a flat response from low frequencies up to the frequency comparable to the bit rate of the transmission systems, e.g., 1 MHz to 10 GHz for a 10 Gb/s digital signal.
Direct gain modulation of a semiconductor laser is a known, simple scheme to generate FM. It generally comprises the steps of biasing the laser with a DC bias so as to provide gain to the laser, and modulating this injected current about the DC bias so as to generate the desired FM. However, this method of FM generation is very inefficient. More particularly, a measure of FM efficiency is the ratio of the peak-peak frequency modulation (also sometimes referred to as adiabatic chirp) generated to the applied modulation current or the applied modulation voltage (as the case may be). For example, for a directly modulated laser in which the laser impedance is matched to 50 Ohms, the FM efficiency is typically about 3 GHz/V. Direct gain modulation generates frequency modulation (adiabatic chirp) through the physical mechanism sometimes called gain compression, spatial hole burning, and linewidth enhancement, which generates an index change for any associated gain change in the material. All of these processes are known in the art. Furthermore, FM modulation by gain modulation through current injection leads to the heating of laser cavity, which in turn causes the lasing frequency to red shift to lower frequencies on a slow time scale. This effect is sometimes called thermal chirp and typically has a frequency response of <20 MHz associated with the thermal diffusion and dissipation time constants. Thermal chirp, which is red shifted for an increase in drive signal, counteracts the desired adiabatic chirp, which generates a blue shift for the same signal. Thermal chirp can generate pattern dependence and can increase the bit error rate (BER) of a digital transmission system such as a chirp managed laser (CML) transmitter.
The quality and performance of a digital fiber optic transmitter is determined by the distance over which the transmitted digital signal can propagate without severe distortions. The bit error rate (BER) of the signal is measured at a receiver after propagation through dispersive fiber, and the optical power required to obtain a certain BER (typically 10.sup.-12), which is sometimes called the sensitivity, is determined. The difference in sensitivity at the output of the transmitter vis-à-vis the sensitivity after propagation is sometimes called the dispersion penalty. This is typically characterized by the distance over which a dispersion penalty reaches a level of about 1 dB. A standard 10 Gb/s optical digital transmitter, such as an externally modulated source, can transmit up to a distance of about 50 km in standard single mode fiber at 1550 nm before the dispersion penalty reaches a level of about 1 dB, which is sometimes called the dispersion limit. The dispersion limit is determined by the fundamental assumption that the digital signal is transform-limited, i.e., the signal has no time-varying phase across its bits and has a bit period of 100 ps, or 1/(bit rate), for the standard 10 Gb/s transmission. Another measure of the quality of a transmitter is the absolute sensitivity after fiber propagation.
Three types of optical transmitters are presently in use in prior art fiber optic systems: (i) directly modulated lasers (DML); (ii) Electroabsorption Modulated Lasers (EML); and (iii) Externally Modulated Mach Zhender modulators (Mz). For transmission in standard single mode fiber at 10 Gb/s, and 1550 nm, it has generally been assumed that MZ modulators and EMLs can have the longest reach, typically reaching approximately 80 km. Using a special coding scheme, sometimes referred to as the phase-shaped duobinary approach, MZ transmitters can reach approximately 200 km. On the other hand, directly modulated lasers (DML) typically reach <5 km because their inherent time-dependent chirp causes severe distortion of the signal after this distance.
Recently, various systems have been developed which provide long-reach lightwave data transmission (e.g., >80 km at 10 Gb/s) using DMLs. By way of example but not limitation, systems which increase the reach of DMLs to >80 km at 10 Gb/s in single mode fiber are disclosed in (i) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/272,100, filed Nov. 8, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for POWER SOURCE FOR A DISPERSION COMPENSATION FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM; (ii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/441,944, filed May 26, 2006 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for FLAT DISPERSION FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATOR (FDFD); and (iii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,522, filed Dec. 3, 2002 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for HIGH-SPEED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM COMPRISING A COUPLED MULTI-CAVITY OPTICAL DISCRIMINATOR; which patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The transmitters associated with these novel systems are sometimes referred to as Chirp Managed Laser (CML™) transmitters by Azna LLC of Wilmington, Mass. In these new CML systems, a Frequency Modulated (FM) source is followed by an Optical Spectrum Reshaper (OSR) which uses the frequency modulation to increase the amplitude modulated signal and partially compensate for dispersion in the transmission fiber. See
The present invention is intended to enhance the performance of the aforementioned CML systems, among other things.
The present invention provides a laser having a gain section and a phase section. The phase section adapted to receive a binary base signal having a bit period T. The phase section is modulated by the binary base signal to generate a first signal having frequency modulation encoding the binary base signal. An optical spectrum reshaper (OSR) receives the first signal and reshapes it into a second signal, wherein the second signal is amplitude modulated and frequency modulated.
In another aspect of the invention a driving circuit is coupled to the phase section and gain section and configured to simultaneously modulate both the phase and gain sections such that the first signal is both frequency and amplitude modulated.
In another aspect of the invention the gain and phase sections are monolithically coupled to one another.
In another aspect of the invention, the phase and gain sections are coupled to an external reflector cavity. The external cavity may include parallel resonator rings, a multi-path ring resonator, a triple coupler ring resonator a grating waveguide structure.
In another aspect of the invention the laser is a distributed feedback laser having a modulated phase section embedded in the laser cavity, such as between first and second gain sections.
In another aspect of the invention, the laser comprises a tunable twin guide sampled grating or a Y-branch distributed Bragg reflector laser.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:
The large FM efficiency by loss modulation can be understood by considering
A modification of the “standard rate equations model” for a semiconductor laser can demonstrate how loss modulation generates FM in the case of high speed modulation.
In order to elucidate the difference between conventional gain modulation and the loss modulation approach of the present invention, we can compare the small signal frequency response solutions of the rate equations for the two cases (i.e., conventional gain modulation and the loss modulation approach of the present invention).
In contrast,
In another embodiment of the present invention, the FM response is enhanced by the addition of intra-cavity phase modulation.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the loss modulated FM source is used as the source in a chirp managed laser (CML), together with an optical spectrum reshaper (OSR) filter, as described in (i) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/037,718, filed Jan. 18, 2005 by Yasuhiro Matsui et al. for CHIRP MANAGED DIRECTLY MODULATED LASER WITH BANDWIDTH LIMITING OPTICAL SPECTRUM RESHAPER; (ii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/068,032, filed Feb. 28, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for OPTICAL SYSTEM COMPRISING AN FM SOURCE AND A SPECTRAL RESHAPING ELEMENT; and (iii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/084,630, filed Mar. 18, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for FLAT-TOPPED CHIRP INDUCED BY OPTICAL FILTER EDGE; which patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment of the present invention, and looking now at
A variety of mechanisms can be used to induce modulation of loss in the cavity of a laser. These include, but are not limited to, (i) the quantum confined stark effect (QCSE); (ii) the Pockels effect; and (iii) the Franz-Keldysh effect. These are all different manifestations of a change in the absorption or index characteristics of a semiconductor material by the application of a voltage to the material, and are known in the art.
Intra-cavity loss modulation can be applied to a variety of monolithic laser designs. By way of example but not limitation, these include (i) distributed feedback (DFB) lasers; (ii) distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) lasers; (iii) sampled grating distributed Bragg reflector (SG-DBR) lasers; and (iv) Y branch DBR lasers. In each case, a new loss section of the laser needs to be added (e.g., an EA section or a saturable absorber section) in order to induce loss in the cavity. Alternatively, the mirror loss can be modulated in each case.
Other lasers can also be loss modulated so as to generate the desired FM. These include, but are not limited to, (i) external cavity lasers such as external cavity lasers with fiber Bragg gratings, ring resonators, planar lightwave circuit (PLC) Bragg gratings, arrayed waveguide gratings (AWG), and grating filters as external cavities; (ii) vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSEL); and (iii) Fabry Perot lasers. All of the foregoing lasers, as well as other lasers, can also be loss modulated so as to generate the desired FM.
Referring to
An FM modulation scheme in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is based on the incorporation of an electro-optic (EO) phase modulator in the cavity. In the proposed FM modulation scheme, the EO effect in reverse biased phase modulator can create refractive index modulation of typically 0.1%. Assuming a typical optical confinement factor of 0.15 in the vertical direction and 0.2 in the longitudinal direction, the estimated FM modulation efficiency is 2 GHz/V. Further increase in the FM efficiency is achievable by increasing the length of the phase modulator. The limitation on modulation bandwidth is set by the RC cut-off frequency where C is the parasitic capacitance and R is the 50 ohm matching resistivity. The limitation by the parasitic capacitance can be removed by the design of a high-speed traveling wave electrode having effective 50 ohm impedance for the given C.
The advantage of high FM modulation bandwidth for the EO modulation in phase section of laser provides a path for wide bandwidth high FM modulation efficiency for the external cavity laser for tunable applications based on various filter types, such as a ring resonator, Bragg grating on PLC or fiber, DBR, SG-DBR, MG-Y. For the counterpart of direct modulation of gain region, on the other hand, the effective differential gain is reduced by a fraction of gain section with respect to the total cavity a length, and thus reduced the modulation bandwidth as well as FM modulation efficiency.
The bandwidth of modulation for the reverse bias scheme to a passive laser section based on Pockels/Franz Keldysh/Wannier-Stark/QCSE effects is not limited by the differential gain, which is effectively reduced for the extended cavity laser by a factor defined for the fraction of active section to the total cavity length. In embodiments of the present invention, high speed modulation is achievable for long cavity DBR lasers and external cavity lasers with external ring resonator filters or Bragg gratings on a fiber or planar lightwave circuit (PLC).
Referring specifically to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring to
The free spectral range (FSR) of the multi-path resonator ring reflector of
Referring to
The chip 38 includes a first path 54 and a second path 56. The second path 56 is circular and is coupled to the first path 54 at points K1 and K2. A first end 58 of the first path 54 receives light from the gain section 34 and phase modulated section 36. A second end 60 of the first path 54 emits light into the chip 38. An output waveguide 62 is coupled to the second path 56 and has one end coupled to a highly reflective surface 64.
Referring to
Polymer based material can be used for the waveguides in the chip 38 to enable high index change by temperature (4×10−4/° C.) for tuning by heating. The diameter of the ring resonator 66 may be chosen to minimize the radiation loss for the propagation of light in the ring, which is determined by the refractive index difference between the waveguide material and the chip 38. As an example, the minimum diameter for low loss ring for Polymide (Δn˜22%) will be 10 μm (FSR˜20 nm). In this case, the limited spectral bandwidth of the gain media can be used for selecting the single mode from the multiple reflection peaks for the ring resonator 66 separated by 20 nm.
Referring to
Referring to
In the above described embodiments of
The lasers 10 of
In another embodiment, the frequency modulation of the phase section results in frequency excursions between a base frequency and a peak frequency, with the frequency excursions encoding a data signal. In some embodiments the difference between the base and peak frequency is between 0.25 and 0.75 times 1/T as explained in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/068,032, filed Feb. 28, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for OPTICAL SYSTEM COMPRISING AN FM SOURCE AND A SPECTRAL RESHAPING ELEMENT.
The modulation of the phase section in the lasers 10 of
It will be understood that many changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principles and scope of the present invention.
This patent application: (i) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/272,100, filed Nov. 8, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for POWER SOURCE FOR A DISPERSION COMPENSATION FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM; (ii) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,522, filed Dec. 3, 2002 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for HIGH-SPEED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM COMPRISING A COUPLED MULTI-CAVITY OPTICAL DISCRIMINATOR; (iii) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/441,944, filed May 26, 2006 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for FLAT DISPERSION FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATOR (FDFD); (iv) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/037,718, filed Jan. 18, 2005 by Yasuhiro Matsui et al. for CHIRP MANAGED DIRECTLY MODULATED LASER WITH BANDWIDTH LIMITING OPTICAL SPECTRUM RESHAPER; (v) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/068,032, filed Feb. 28, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for OPTICAL SYSTEM COMPRISING AN FM SOURCE AND A SPECTRAL RESHAPING ELEMENT; (vi) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/084,630, filed Mar. 18, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for FLAT-TOPPED CHIRP INDUCED BY OPTICAL FILTER EDGE; (vii) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/787,163, filed Apr. 13, 2007 by Yasuhiro Matsui et al. for OPTICAL FM SOURCE BASED ON INTRA-CAVITY PHASE AND AMPLITUDE MODULATION IN LASERS; (viii) claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/906,333, filed Mar. 12, 2007 by Yasuhiro Matsui et al. for OPTICAL FM SOURCE BASED ON INTRA-CAVITY PHASE AND AMPLITUDE MODULATION IN LASERS. The eight (8) above-identified patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324295 | Harris | Jun 1967 | A |
3999105 | Archey et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4038600 | Thomas | Jul 1977 | A |
4561119 | Epworth | Dec 1985 | A |
4805235 | Henmi | Feb 1989 | A |
4841519 | Nishio | Jun 1989 | A |
5293545 | Huber | Mar 1994 | A |
5325378 | Zorabedian | Jun 1994 | A |
5371625 | Wedding et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5412474 | Reasenberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416629 | Huber | May 1995 | A |
5465264 | Buhler et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477368 | Eskildsen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5550667 | Krimmel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5592327 | Gabl et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5737104 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5777773 | Epworth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805235 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5856980 | Doyle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5920416 | Beylat et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953139 | Nemecek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974209 | Cho et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6081361 | Adams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096496 | Frankel | Aug 2000 | A |
6104851 | Mahgerefteh | Aug 2000 | A |
6115403 | Brenner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6222861 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271959 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298186 | He | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331991 | Mahgerefteh | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359716 | Taylor | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6473214 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506342 | Frankel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563623 | Penninckx et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577013 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618513 | Evankow, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654564 | Colbourne et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665351 | Hedberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687278 | Mason et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6748133 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778307 | Clark | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810047 | Oh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834134 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836487 | Farmer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847758 | Watanabe | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6947206 | Tsadka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963685 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013090 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7054538 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7076170 | Choa | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123846 | Tateyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7263291 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280721 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7406267 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7555225 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020154372 | Chung et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159490 | Karwacki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176659 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002120 | Choa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067952 | Tsukiji et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099018 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030147114 | Kang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193974 | Frankel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040008933 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008937 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036943 | Freund et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076199 | Wipiejewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096221 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040218890 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050100345 | Welch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111852 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050175356 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206989 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050271394 | Whiteaway et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286829 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002718 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018666 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029358 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029396 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029397 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060228120 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2006 | A9 |
20060233556 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274993 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 107 147 | Apr 1983 | GB |
9905804 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0104999 | Jan 2001 | WO |
03005512 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090060526 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60906333 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11787163 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12047017 | US | |
Parent | 11441944 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 11787163 | US | |
Parent | 11272100 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11441944 | US | |
Parent | 11037718 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11272100 | US | |
Parent | 11084630 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 11037718 | US | |
Parent | 11068032 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11084630 | US | |
Parent | 10308522 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11068032 | US |