This disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with a subterranean well and, in an example described below, more particularly provides optical push-pull interferometric sensors for electromagnetic sensing.
It can be useful to monitor a subterranean reservoir over time, in order to detect changes in the reservoir. For example, in conventional and enhanced oil recovery, processes such as water flooding, steam flooding and chemical flooding can be implemented. It is useful to monitor injection of water, steam or chemicals into a formation, and/or to monitor progress of the water, steam or chemicals toward or away from one or more wellbores. Monitoring a flood front helps avoid flood breakthroughs, and thereby optimize hydrocarbon production, and can also save costs by reducing an amount of steam, water and/or chemicals used.
Therefore, it will be appreciated that improvements are continually needed in the art of monitoring changes in subterranean reservoirs. Such improvements may be used for monitoring flood front progress, for monitoring other changes in an earth formation, or for other purposes.
Representatively illustrated in
In the
The flood front's 12 progress may be monitored toward or away from the wellbore 16, or another characteristic of the formation 14 could be monitored, etc. Thus, the scope of this disclosure is not limited to the details of the example depicted in
In the
A transmitter 26 can be used to generate electromagnetic energy consisting of electric and magnetic field components. Thus, electromagnetic fields 28 (e.g., primary, secondary, etc., fields) are induced in the formation 14. However, it should be clearly understood that the scope of this disclosure is not limited at all to any particular way of inducing electromagnetic fields in a formation, or to any particular type of electromagnetic fields induced in a formation.
The transmitter 26 could comprise coils external to the casing 24. In other examples, the casing 24 itself could be used to generate the electromagnetic fields 28, such as, by using the casing as a conductor.
In further examples, the transmitter 26 could be positioned in another wellbore, at the earth's surface, or in another location. The scope of this disclosure is not limited to any particular position of a transmitter, to any particular type of transmitter, or to any particular technique for generating an electromagnetic field in the formation 14.
The sensors 20 detect the electromagnetic field 28. Measurements of the electromagnetic field 28 are then inverted to obtain the resistivity of the formation 14.
In some examples, a time-lapse measurement may be performed, in which electric or magnetic fields at each sensor 20 location are measured as a function of time. In a time-lapse measurement system, first a sensor signal is recorded at a time when there is no flood. During reservoir monitoring for waterfront, a differential signal (between the no flood case and with flood case) at each sensor is recorded—which is the field due to flood. As the flood approaches closer to a sensor 20 (e.g., in a production well), the differential signal gets larger. The intensity of the signal indicates a distance to the flood front 12.
The final output of the system could either be resistivity or field due to flood, depending on a post-processing algorithm used. Direct field measurement is comparatively straightforward, while converting the direct measurement to resistivity makes the post-processing more complicated.
Basically, in the sensors 20, a physical perturbation interacts with an optical waveguide to directly modulate light traveling through the waveguide. This modulated signal travels back along the same or another waveguide to a signal interrogation system, where the signal is demodulated, and the corresponding perturbation is determined.
Preferably, an optical fiber (or another optical waveguide, such as an optical ribbon, etc.) is bonded to or jacketed by a ferromagnetic material which is a magnetostrictive material used as a magnetic field receiver. Such materials undergo a change in shape or dimension (e.g., elongation or contraction) in the presence of a magnetic field.
This property is known as magnetostriction. Some widely used magnetostrictive materials are Co, Fe, Ni, and iron-based alloys METGLAS™ and TERFENOL-D™.
The sensors 20 can be used to measure electric fields when the optical waveguide is bonded to or jacketed by a ferroelectric material which is an electrostrictive material. Ferroelectric materials undergo a change in shape or dimension in the presence of an electric field.
This property is known as electrostriction. Some examples of electrostrictive ceramics are lead magnesium niobate (PMN), lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate (PMN-PT) and lead lanthanum zirconate titanate (PLZT).
However, it should be clearly understood that the scope of this disclosure is not limited to use of any particular magnetostrictive or electrostrictive material. Any suitable material which changes shape in response to exposure to a magnetic and/or electric field may be used.
Referring additionally now to
In the
When the material 32 changes shape, the length of the optical waveguide 30 bonded to or jacketed by the material is elongated or contracted. Thus, strain is induced in the waveguide 30 due to the electromagnetic field 28.
In
In
In
In the
The strain (for magnetostrictive material 32) is given by:
ε3=CH2 (1)
where C is an effective magnetostrictive coefficient, and H is a sum of alternating and direct magnetic fields (Hac and Hdc). Expanding the H field term, and extracting only the term that has the same frequency as the original Hac gives:
ε3=2CHacHdc (2)
This indicates that the strain is linearly proportional to the magnetic field.
Similarly, the strain (for an electrostrictive material 32) is given by:
ε3=ME2 (3)
where M is an effective electrostrictive coefficient, and E is a sum of alternating and direct electric fields (Eac and Edc). Expanding the E field term, and extracting only the term that has the same frequency as the original Eac gives:
ε3=2MEacEdc (4)
This indicates that the strain is linearly proportional to the electric field.
The strain (due to magnetostriction or electrostriction of the material 32) can be measured using interferometric methods, such as Mach-Zehnder, Michelson, Sagnac, Fabry-Perot, etc.
Representatively illustrated in
A light source 42 (such as a laser, etc.) transmits light 44 through the sensing arm 37 and the reference arm 38. An optical detector 46 receives the light, which is the interference between the lights 44 from the two arms 37, 38.
If the optical waveguide 30 undergoes strain due to exposure of the material 32 to an electric and/or magnetic field, this changes an optical path length for the light 44 in the sensing arm 37 as compared to the reference arm 38. This change in path length causes an optical phase shift between the light 44 transmitted through the sensing arm 37 and light transmitted through the reference arm 38. The phase change is given by:
Δφ=2πnL/λ*[ε3−[(P11+P12)ε1+P12ε3]n2/2] (5)
where Δφ is a difference in phase, n is the refractive index, L is a length of the waveguide 30 bonded to, jacketed by, or wrapped about the material 32, λ, is the wavelength of light 44, P11 and P12 are Pockels coefficients, and ε1 and ε3 are strains in transverse and longitudinal directions, respectively.
The phase difference Δφ measured using this method is proportional to the magnetic and/or electric field, which in turn is a measure of resistivity. Of course, other methods may be used for detecting the change in length of the waveguide 30, and for relating this length change to the electromagnetic field strength, in keeping with the scope of this disclosure.
In the
At the sensor 20 locations, an optical signal (such as light 44) transmitted through the waveguide 30 is modulated by a change in shape of the material 32 due to the electromagnetic field 28. The modulated signal from each sensor 20 travels along the cable 18 to a signal interrogation device, where each sensor's signal is extracted and demodulated, enabling a determination of the electromagnetic field strength at each sensor location. In this manner, resistivity of the formation 14 can be mapped along the optical cable 18.
Referring additionally now to
A greater length of the waveguide 30 bonded to, jacketed by, or wrapped about the material 32 results in a greater total strain induced in the waveguide. This technique enhances a sensitivity of the sensor 20 to the electromagnetic field 28.
Another technique for enhancing a sensitivity of the sensor 20 is representatively illustrated in
In the
Materials which experience negative magnetostriction include Ni, Co, ferrites, nickel ferrites and Co doped nickel ferrites.
Another arm of the interferometer 36 comprises another optical waveguide 50 which is bonded to, jacketed by, or wrapped about another material 52. Preferably, the material 52 in this example comprises a magnetostrictive material which elongates in response to exposure to a magnetic field (positive magnetostriction). Materials which experience positive magnetostriction include METGLAS™, Fe, PERMALLOY™ and TERFENOL-D™.
Thus, when the sensor 20 of
Since the optical path length change is greater in the
Referring additionally to
As with the Mach Zehnder interferometer 36 in the
Referring additionally now to
For the WDM examples, a light source is preferably a broadband laser, whereas for the TDM examples the light source is preferably pulsed. For hybrid examples, preferably a broadband pulsed source is used.
In
WDM adds or couplers 58 can be used to transmit all of the wavelengths of light 44 to the detector 46 for de-multiplexing and demodulating. The light which passed through each sensor 20 is readily identified by its corresponding wavelength (λ1, λ2, λ3, . . . ). Thus,
In
Since the light 44 from the different sensors 20 will arrive at the detector 46 at respective different times, the detector can easily determine the light that was transmitted through each set of sensors. Although only two sensors 20 are depicted in
In
Since the light 44 from the different sets of WDM multiplexed sensors 20 will arrive at the detector 46 at respective different times, the detector can easily determine the light that was transmitted through each set of sensors. Wavelength differences in the light 44 returned to the detector 46 characterize particular sensors 20 in each set of sensors. Although only two sets of WDM and TDM multiplexed sets of sensors 20 are depicted in
It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides significant advancements to the art of detecting electromagnetic fields in subterranean formations, and thereby measuring resistivities of formations. In examples described above, the sensor 20 includes an interferometer 36 with both negative and positive magnetostrictive materials 32, 52, thereby increasing a sensitivity of the sensor to changes in resistivity of the formation 14, enabling monitoring of the progress of the flood front 12 from a greater distance, and with greater accuracy. However, it is not necessary for a flood front to be monitored in keeping with the scope of this disclosure.
A method of measuring an electromagnetic field 28 in a subterranean earth formation 14 is provided to the art by the above disclosure. In one example, the method can comprise: installing at least one electromagnetic sensor 20 in a well, the sensor 20 comprising multiple optical waveguides 30, 50 and respective multiple materials 32, 52; and in response to exposure to the electromagnetic field 28, the materials 32, 52 changing shape, thereby increasing optical path length or optical phase in a first one of the optical waveguides 30 and decreasing optical path length or optical phase in a second one of the optical waveguides 50.
The changing shape step can include the first optical waveguide 30 elongating and the second optical waveguide 50 contracting. The materials 32, 52 can comprise both positive and negative magnetostrictive materials.
The optical waveguides 30, 50 may comprise legs of an interferometer 36. The materials 32, 52 can be bonded directly to the respective optical waveguides 30, 50.
The method may include permanently installing the sensor 20 in a wellbore 16. The method may include installing the sensor 20 in cement 22 between a casing 24 and a wellbore 16.
The method can include the sensor 20 detecting the electromagnetic field 28 which is related to resistivity in the formation 14.
Also described above is a well system 10. In one example, the well system 10 can include an optical electromagnetic sensor 20 installed in a well, whereby the sensor 20 measures an electromagnetic field 28 in an earth formation 14. Optical phases or path lengths in optical waveguides 30, 50 of the sensor 20 change both positively and negatively in response to exposure to the electromagnetic field 28.
The sensor 20 can include materials 32, 52 which change shape in response to exposure to the electromagnetic field 28. The optical path length/phase in the optical waveguides 30, 50 may change in response to changes in shapes of the respective materials 32, 52.
The materials 32, 52 can comprise magnetostrictive materials. In an example described above, the materials 32, 52 comprise both positive and negative magnetostrictive materials.
A method of monitoring an earth formation 14 is also described above. In one example, the method comprises: installing at least one optical electromagnetic sensor 20 in a wellbore 16 which penetrates the formation 14; and a first optical path length in a first optical waveguide 30 of the sensor 20 increasing in response to exposure to a electromagnetic field 28, and a second optical path length in a second optical waveguide 50 of the sensor 20 decreasing in response to exposure to the electromagnetic field 28.
The sensor 20 can include first and second materials 32, 52 which change shape in response to exposure to the electromagnetic field 28. The first optical path length in the first optical waveguide 30 changes in response to a change in the first material 32 shape, and the second optical path length in the second optical waveguide 50 changes in response to a change in the second material 52 shape.
The first material 32 may comprise a positive magnetostrictive material, and the second material 52 may comprise a negative magnetostrictive material.
The method can include performing a time-lapse measurement of the electromagnetic field 28 at the sensor 20 as a function of time. A differential signal may be recorded in the time-lapse measurement, the differential signal being a difference between an output of the sensor 20 prior to a change in the formation 14, and an output of the sensor 20 after a change in the formation 14.
Although various examples have been described above, with each example having certain features, it should be understood that it is not necessary for a particular feature of one example to be used exclusively with that example. Instead, any of the features described above and/or depicted in the drawings can be combined with any of the examples, in addition to or in substitution for any of the other features of those examples. One example's features are not mutually exclusive to another example's features. Instead, the scope of this disclosure encompasses any combination of any of the features.
Although each example described above includes a certain combination of features, it should be understood that it is not necessary for all features of an example to be used. Instead, any of the features described above can be used, without any other particular feature or features also being used.
It should be understood that the various embodiments described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of this disclosure. The embodiments are described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which is not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
In the above description of the representative examples, directional terms (such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” etc.) are used for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings. However, it should be clearly understood that the scope of this disclosure is not limited to any particular directions described herein.
The terms “including,” “includes,” “comprising,” “comprises,” and similar terms are used in a non-limiting sense in this specification. For example, if a system, method, apparatus, device, etc., is described as “including” a certain feature or element, the system, method, apparatus, device, etc., can include that feature or element, and can also include other features or elements. Similarly, the term “comprises” is considered to mean “comprises, but is not limited to.”
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the disclosure, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to the specific embodiments, and such changes are contemplated by the principles of this disclosure. For example, structures disclosed as being separately formed can, in other examples, be integrally formed and vice versa. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4348587 | Tangonan et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4376248 | Giallorenzi et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4433291 | Yariv et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4622460 | Failes et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4753529 | Layton | Jun 1988 | A |
4868495 | Einzig et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4918371 | Bobb | Apr 1990 | A |
5171981 | Wood | Dec 1992 | A |
5305075 | Bucholtz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5471139 | Zadoff | Nov 1995 | A |
5491335 | Bucholtz et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5706079 | Kersey | Jan 1998 | A |
5754284 | Leblanc et al. | May 1998 | A |
5898517 | Weis | Apr 1999 | A |
6289740 | Posey, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294917 | Nichols | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314056 | Bunn et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6463186 | Li | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480000 | Kong et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6724469 | Leblanc | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747743 | Skinner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6809516 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6957576 | Skinner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7453763 | Johnstad | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8035393 | Tenghamn et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8172007 | Dolman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20010023614 | Tubel et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030057950 | Gao et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030205375 | Wright et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050034863 | Dillenbeck et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060028208 | Strack et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038115 | Maas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060081412 | Wright et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070046289 | Troxler | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080042636 | Koste et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080180681 | Digonnet | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090199630 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100046002 | Perez et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100316328 | Arias Vidal et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110084696 | Tenghamn et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088462 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090496 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110139447 | Ramos et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170112 | Gibler et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110292763 | Coates et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298461 | Bittar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308788 | Ravi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001625 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013893 | Maida et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014211 | Maida, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120061084 | Sweatman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120126993 | Samson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147381 | Leblanc et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179378 | Duncan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120205103 | Ravi et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212229 | Sinclair et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234605 | Donderici et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250017 | Morys et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257475 | Luscombe et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140139225 | Mandviwala | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2166864 | May 1986 | GB |
2433112 | Jun 2007 | GB |
2452609 | Mar 2009 | GB |
2011069700 | Apr 2011 | JP |
WO 2012028846 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jan. 10, 2014 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/064115, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jan. 10, 2014 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/064122, 10 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/736,324, filed Jan. 8, 2013, 21 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/226,578, filed Sep. 7, 2011, 30 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/726,054, filed Dec. 22, 2012, 24 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/418,455, filed Mar. 13, 2012, 27 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,414, filed Mar. 21, 2012, 30 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/655,607, filed Oct. 19, 2012, 32 pages. |
Specification and Drawing for U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,788, filed Oct. 5, 2011, 23 pages. |
Campanella, Humberto et al.; “Comparative performance of static-mode ferrous MEMS gradiometers fabricated by a three-step DRIE process”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 20, No. 4, dated May 21, 2010, 10 pages. |
Specification and drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,897, filed Oct. 10, 2012, 19 pages. |
Specification and drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 13/679,940, filed Nov. 16, 2012, 34 pages. |
Optics Letters; “Fiber-Optic AC Electric-Field Sensor Based on the Electrostrictive Effect”, vol. 17, No. 5, dated Mar. 1, 1992, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued Apr. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/679,926, 31 pages. |
Office Action issued Jul. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/679,926, 23 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140139226 A1 | May 2014 | US |