The invention relates to a method and an arrangement for controlling an optical IQ modulator.
This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/054021, filed on Mar. 3, 2014. The contents of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
In optical transmission systems optical signals are transmitted over an optical fiber. Different kinds of modulation and associated types of modulators are used to generate appropriate transmission signals. A common modulator is the QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) or IQ modulator (I—in-phase, Q—quadrature). A common structure of such an IQ modulator is a nested MZM (Mach-Zehnder Modulator), which consist of two combined parallel working Mach-Zehnder modulators. Optical IQ modulators, independent of their respective realization, have to be adjusted internally in order to deliver the wanted optical waveform. Misaligned modulators insert unwanted spurious by-signals into the optical waveform which distort the optical transmission. The adjustment has to be online, i.e. during operation of the device in order to avoid traffic interruption. The adjustment is either continuously or it takes place every few seconds to minutes. Other problems which have to be solved in case of very high requirements on signal quality is to minimize the effects of the non perfect transfer functions of the analog modulator drivers and a not perfect balance, optical power and electro-optic transfer function within the IQ modulator.
The basic arrangement of an IQ modulator is shown in
State of the art to adjust the bias of MZM1 and MZM2 is to apply a pilot tone with a frequency f3 on the phase shifters P1, P2 and to apply a further pilot tone with a frequency of f4 on P3, P4, and with help of a monitor diode to minimize the output signals at the modulation frequencies f3 and f4 respectively (and/or maximize the output signals at double modulation frequencies 2*f3 and 2*f4; the pilot tones with frequencies f3 and f4 are shown later in the embodiments of the invention).
The more sophisticated task is to set the 90° point between output components IOS and QOS of the main MZM to achieve e.g. ideal quadrature phase-shift modulation or single sideband modulation.
An IQ modulator and a simple biasing method is e.g. described by Kaoru Higuma et al. in IEICE 2006, Electronics Express Vo. 3; No. 11, pages 234-242, DOI: 10.1587/elex. 3.238. The IQ modulator comprises only one phase shifter electrode per MZM to control the transfer function and to control the phase difference between the signals output from the parallel MZMs This multifunctional modulator can work as a single sideband modulator, a QPSK modulator and so on. It is necessary to control the modulator automatically to avoid unstable operation.
The patent US 2007/0133918 A1, which is included by reference, describes also an IQ modulator with two parallel MZMs wherein only one phase shifter electrode per MZM is necessary to control the transfer function and another phase shifter electrode is necessary to control the phase difference between the output signals from the parallel MZMs.
The patent also discloses a method and system for automatic feedback control of the optical IQ modulator for generating of a quaternary phase-shift-keyed signal without pilot tones. The method comprises the steps of detecting a part of an output signal from the QPSK modulator and processing the signal in the frequency domain to optimise the output data quality by automatic feedback control. The method comprises minimizing (or maximizing) output signals with the help of a gradient algorithm by applying a dithering voltage to an allocated phase shifter. A phase shift of ΔΦ=π/2 is controlled by adjusting a minimum RF output power.
The method described above for use with IQ modulation like (D)-QPSK is easy to implement but has some severe disadvantages with respect to single sideband modulation. If the IQ modulator is used for single side-band generation with many carriers which may be individually switched on or off, this prevents an algorithm who adjusts the 90° setting in the main MZM with help of minimizing the RF output power.
Another disadvantage of the method is the need for partial derivatives this implies low noise monitor signals and the absence of electrical disturbances by imperfect electrical analog and digital circuitry. Additionally a broadband monitor diode is needed for power detection within a several GHz wide band.
It is an object of the invention to control an IQ modulator.
The present disclosure provides a method for controlling an optical IQ modulator, including a first Mach-Zehnder modulator and a second Mach-Zehnder modulator, which output signals are added with a phase difference of 90°, comprising the steps of
The invention solves the problem of adjusting the 90° phase difference of the main MZM by generating a control signal which power depends on the quality of the single sideband generation and whose frequency can be far below 1 MHz. The detection of the minimum power is a preferred solution.
An equivalent solution is the detection of a maximum power at a second inverse output of the IQ modulator. The adjustment of the 90° phase is realized independent of any data signals.
According to one example, the first pilot signal and the second single sideband pilot signal are constant wave signals having different frequencies, and the phase control signal corresponds to a signal with a beat frequency of these pilot signals.
The use of two pilot signals having different frequencies leads to a basic solution of a control method. Depending on the implementation of the IQM (additional output ports for MZM1 and MZM2) these pilot signals may be used for further adjustments.
According to one example, the first single sideband pilot signal is additional modulated by a first carrier modulation signal having a first carrier modulation frequency and the second single sideband pilot signal is additional modulated by a second carrier modulation signal having a second carrier modulation frequency; and the phase control signal is selected from the monitoring signals corresponding to a signal with a beat frequency of the carrier modulation signals.
Further in one example, the first single sideband pilot signal and the second single sideband pilot signal have a same basic modulation frequency.
Both optical single sideband pilot signals of both sidebands are generated by modulating the optical carrier. The basic modulation signals (electric carrier) have an identical frequency. Each basic modulation signal is itself modulated by a low frequency carrier modulation signal, e.g. generating amplitude modulated (ASK) optical pilot signals. The phase control signal corresponding to a signal with a beat frequency of the carrier modulation signals is derived from the monitoring signals and evaluated to adjust the IQM phase angle.
According to one example, the method comprises further the steps of
An alternative embodiment comprises the steps of
The monitoring of the further pilot signals or the primary pilot signals (generated by MZM1 and MZM2) of the single sideband pilot signals output from MZM1 and MZM2 solves the problems of adjusting the parallel MZM1 and MZM2 including the automatic compensation of an imperfect modulator and modulator driver (especially imbalances in the transfer function for I and Q signal) properties and including power adjustment. Advantageously is the power minimum (bias point 0° in
The first Mach-Zehnder modulator, the second first Mach-Zehnder modulator, and the IQ modulator are controlled by bias (control) signals.
The pilot modulation signals may be combined with data modulation signals or with the bias signals which determine the power transfer functions of the first and the second Mach-Zehnder modulator.
The invention may be advantageously used if single sidebands data signals are generated in an upper and a lower optical sideband by the data modulation signals (RI(t); RQ(t)).
An optimized single sideband generation of the pilot tones leads to generation of optimized single sideband data signals.
A system for controlling an IQ modulator, including a first Mach-Zehnder modulator and a second parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator, comprises a control unit arranged for
The optical single sideband pilot signals may be constant wave signals with different frequencies and the phase control signal corresponds to a signal with a beat frequency of the single sideband pilot signals.
In another embodiment
The control unit is arranged for generating further control signals and for detecting and evaluating corresponding power control signals for controlling power transfer functions of the first Mach-Zehnder modulator and the second Mach-Zehnder modulator.
The control unit and the IQ modulator are arranged
The system comprises means for
More details of the invention and their advantages are described in the description.
Examples of the invention including a presently preferred embodiment are described below with reference to accompanying drawings, where
In the MZM2 the constant wave signal may be—depending on the purpose—modulated by sin ωt and by −sin ωt or phase shifted modulation signals.
An ideal standardized transfer function PTF of
Preferably a minimum power output value (or maximum value at a not shown second IQM output) is used to bias (adjust) the MZM1 and MZM2. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention a unique pilot signal is fed to each MZM and the phase shifters P1-P4 are varied till the transfer function reaches a minimum as depicted in the standardized power transfer function PTF of
Further, the phase shifters P5 and P6 have to be adjusted that the phase difference ΔΦ between the output signals IOS and QOS of MZM1 and MZM2 is 90°. Regarding the IQM as a single modulator the same standardized power transfer function can be regarded.
Before details of the invention are described a second possible implementation of the IQM, shown in
The phase shifters P1 and P2 are substituted by a single bias electrode with (PTF) power bias port 6, the phase shifters P3 and P4 are implemented as a second single bias electrode with (PTF) power bias port 7, and the phase shifters P5 and P6 are implemented as a single bias electrode controlled via phase shift bias port 8. The modulation (signal input) ports are 4 and 5.
The IQM shown in
The control arrangement includes a control unit 18 implemented as digital signal processor (DSP) which calculates pilot modulation signals S1, S2 for ΔΦ (phase difference) control and further pilot modulation signals S3 and S4 for MZM1 and MZM2 power transfer function control.
I (in-phase/real) and Q (quadrature/imaginary) components of the pilot modulation signals S1 and S2 are combined with further pilot modulation signals S3 and S4 and converted by digital-analog converters 22, 23. The resulting combined modulation signals MI, MQ are added to the appropriate RF (data) modulation signals RI(t) and RQ(t) by adders 24 and 25 and then fed to the IQM modulation ports 4 and 5.
The control unit 18 also calculates DC (direct current) control signals which are also converted into analog bias signals bias_I, bias_Q, bias_ΔΦ by digital-analog converters 19-21.
The combined pilot modulation signals MI, MQ generate an optical IQM output signal MOS comprising beside optical single sideband data signals optical single sideband pilot signals PS1, PS2, and further optical pilot signals PS3, PS4 (
The sophisticated task of setting the phase difference ΔΦ=90° is considered first regarding the control unit depicted in
The single sideband generation of the first pilot signal is achieved by modulating the carrier signal of the first MZM1 with the first pilot modulation signal S1 having a frequency f1 generating a first primary pilot signal and modulating the carrier signal of the second MZM2 with a 90° shifted first pilot modulation signal S1_90° generating a phase shifted first primary pilot signal. The second pilot signal PS2 is generated by “driving” the MZM2 with a second pilot modulation signal S2 having a second frequency f2 and the MZM1 with a 90° shifted pilot modulation signal S2_90° generating associated second primary pilot signals. A primary pilot signal output by the first MZM1 is combined with a phase shifted primary pilot signal output by the second MZM2 to produce the single sideband pilot signal (single sideband data signals are generated accordingly). The output signals IOS and QOS (
Regarded is now the use of the generated single sideband pilot signals PS1, PS2 for ΔΦ adjustment. For better understanding the control method it is assumed (anticipating the result of the IQM control) that the IQM is perfectly balanced and hence ideal optical single sideband pilot signals PS1 and PS2 are generated at different frequencies fcw+f1 and fcw−f2 (e.g. f1=1.41 kHz, f2=1 kHz). This is achieved when the I and Q components of the single sideband pilot signals are ideally combined (without data signals and further pilot signals PS3, PS4 the components of both single sideband pilot signals are identical with IOS and QOS respectively). The monitoring signals MS are derived from the IQM output signal MOS and the pilot signals are converted into the electrical domain and depicted in
If the angle difference ΔΦ between the MZM1 and MZM2 output signals is unequal to 90° both optical pilot signals PS1, PS2 (f1=1.41 kHz, f2=1 kHz) are not generated as pure single sideband signals but components of these signals are also generated in the opposite lower or higher sideband depicted as pilot signals (PS1), (PS2) in an optical power spectrum
One (or more) of the unique monitoring signals, a phase control signal CS12 (
The target of the “ΔΦ bias control” is to optimize the single bandwidth modulation by minimizing the monitored phase control signal CS12. A phase optimizing algorithm can be based on a gradient method or very simply be varying the bias signal “bias_ΔΦ” by a small amount with a rate according to the integration time and depending on the magnitude (f1−f2) at the sampling times t(k), t(k+1), . . . increase or decrease the bias in small steps. A dither signal may be used in another well known control method.
The second embodiment depicted in
Corresponding to the embodiment of
In addition to the ΔΦ=90° bias control—and before a ΔΦ set-up adjustment—the power transfer function of MZM1 and MZM2 has to be optimized and their output powers have to be adjusted. To be independent of data signals further pilot signals PS3, PS4 (shown in
Hence, the standardized combined modulation signals MI and MQ (neglecting the amplitudes) for the first embodiment according
MI(t)=sin(2πf1*t)+cos(2πf2*t)+sin(2πf3*t)=S1+S2_90+S3;
MQ(t)=cos(2πf1*t)+sin(2πf2*t)+sin(2πf4*t)=S1_90+S2+S4.
The standardized combined modulation signals MI and MQ for the second embodiment using modulated pilot signals PM1, PM2 according
M1=sin(2πf1*t) and M2=sin(2πf2*t):
MI(t)=sin(2πfc*t)*sin(2πf1*t)+cos(2πfc*t)*sin(2πf2*t)+sin(2πf3*t)=SM1+SM2_90+S3;
MQ(t)=cos(2πfc*t)*sin(2πf1*t)+sin(2πfc*t)*sin(2πf2*t)+sin(2πf4*t)=SM1_90+SM2+S4;
Power control signals CS3, CS4 (shown before adjustment as dashed lines in
If in a further embodiment (not shown) appropriate output ports of the IQM are available, then MZM1 and MZM2 output signals IOS, QOS (
It is clear for those skilled in the art that the frequencies of the pilot signals are chosen to avoid that the monitoring signals do neither interfere with each other nor with the data signals. Also, that the amplitudes of the modulation signals have to be adapted to the Mach-Zehnder modulator and the chosen control inputs.
The control unit may be additional used for adjustments and optimizing the signal quality of the data signals.
If a set up of the IQ modulator is necessary, following steps are recommendable:
1. A coarse pre-adjustment of the phase shifters monitoring the DC value of the IQM output signal MOS (with or without data signals).
2. Biasing of the parallel modulators MZM1 and MZM2.
3. Adjusting the modulation signal power.
4. Adjust the IQM phase difference.
The steps 2-3 may be repeated or be alternating executed in small steps.
The present invention is not limited to the details of the above described principles. The scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims and all changes and modifications as fall within the equivalents of the scope of the claims are therefore to be embraced by the invention. Especially analogue data processing and digital data processing is exchangeable and also adaption of further and new technical devices.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13160100 | Mar 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/054021 | 3/3/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/146887 | 9/25/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5835212 | Kissa | Nov 1998 | A |
6211996 | Fuse | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6915082 | Yano | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7146103 | Yee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7209660 | Yee | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7447436 | Yee | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7620318 | Li | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20050213862 | Kawanishi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220385 | Kawanishi | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070269223 | Noguchi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100021166 | Way | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20160065314 | Nazarathy | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160282699 | Gottwald | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1921486 | May 2008 | EP |
1927883 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2003486 | Dec 2008 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/EP2014/054021, dated Mar. 28, 2015, pp. 1-12. |
Griffin, R. et al., “10 Gb/s optical differential quadrature phase shift key {DQPSK} transmission using GaAs/A1GaAs integration,” Opical Fiber Communications Conference, (OFC)Post Conference Technical Digest, Post Deadline Papers, (IEEE Cat. No. 02CH37339) Opt Soc. America Washington, DC, USA; [Trends in Optics and Photonics Series(TOPS)], IEEE, vol. TOPS. vol. 70, Mar. 17, 2001, pp. 917-919. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160282699 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |