The present invention relates to optical power-limiting device, and more particularly, to an optical power-limiting passive device and to a method for limiting optical power transmission.
Optical limiters are devices designed to have high transmittance for low level light inputs and low transmittance for high power. Since the development of the first lasers, passive optical limiters have been researched and concepts have been tested to protect optical sensors against laser peak-power induced damage. The first optical limiters for CW lasers were based on thermal lensing in absorbing bulk liquids, i.e., local heating in an imaging system reduced the index of refraction, causing “thermal blooming” and resulting in a beam that was no longer focused. Other methods have been suggested for limiting pulsed laser sources such as reverse saturable absorption, two-photon and free carrier absorption, self-focusing, nonlinear refraction and induced scattering. The device itself must also possess a high threshold against damage, and not get into a state where it is “bleached-out” or transparent.
Communications and other systems in medical, industrial and remote sensing applications, may handle relatively optical high powers, from microwatts up to several watts, in single fibers or waveguides. With high intensities (power per unit area) introduced into these systems, many thin film coatings, optical adhesives, and even bulk materials, are exposed to light intensity beyond their damage thresholds. Another problem is laser safety, wherein there are well-defined upper power limits allowed to be emitted from fibers into the open air. These two issues call for a passive device that will limit the amount of energy propagating in a fiber/waveguide to the allowed level.
There have been many attempts to realize optical limiters, mainly for high power laser radiation, high power pulsed radiation, and eye safety devices. The techniques used in these devices were mainly:
Both No. 1 and 2 of the above-mentioned techniques require very energetic laser beams or light intensities to produce a meaningful limitation. In the first technique, the volumes of liquid to be heated are large and need high powers. Another problem with this method is that the liquid is not a good optical medium and distorts the beam. In the second technique, the n2 coefficient is very small for usable materials and requires very high electric fields.
In the third method, the use of liquids is problematic for most applications. In a communications system, for instance, the use of liquids in a passive device causes noise and distortion from turbulence of the liquid in the optical path. Other problems reported using the colloidal liquid as an optical-limiting medium include aging either by disappearance of the active carbon material or the formation of flocs of loosely bound carbon particles that break up only after ultrasonic deflocculation. Some work has been done on using liquid crystals as limiting material, mainly for high power pulses but these materials cause noise and distortion worse than ordinary liquids due to director fluctuations.
It is therefore a broad object of the present invention to provide an optical power-limiting device and a method for limiting power transmission, which ameliorates the disadvantages of the prior art devices and methods.
In accordance with the present invention, there is therefore provided an optical power-limiting device, comprising an optical-limiting solid mixture in an optical system of limited numerical aperture, the optical-limiting solid mixture includes means affecting its optical properties upon being subjected to optical energy, which cause thermal or electric field induced changes in said optical-limiting solid mixture when passing through.
The invention further provides a method for limiting the power transmitted at a focal point of a lens or mirror in an optical system, inside a waveguide or in a gap between waveguides, where the optical-limiting solid mixture is placed. The optical-limiting solid mixture is composed of light absorbing particles, smaller than the wavelength of visible light (smaller than 0.5 microns) and preferably smaller than 0.1 microns (nano-powder) dispersed in a solid matrix material. The light absorbing particles include at least one metallic or non-metallic material selected from the group consisting of: Ag, Au, Ni, Va, Ti, Co, Cr, C, Re, Si, SmO2 and mixtures of such materials. The solid matrix material may be a transparent or optical polymer or inorganic glass material, e.g., polymethylmethacrylate (“PMMA”) and its derivatives, epoxy resins, glass, spin-on Glass (“SOG”), or other sol-gel materials. The optical-limiting function begins with light absorption in the dispersed powder particles, each according to its absorption spectrum. When the particles are heated by the absorbed light, they conduct heat to their surroundings, leaving hot spots in the volume surrounded by them, and a decreasing temperature gradient in their neighborhood. These hot volumes can decrease the light transmission through the optical-limiting solid mixture by several mechanisms, one of which is scattering due to the refractive index spatial fluctuations created by the hot particle and its surrounding medium of a given, positive or negative, index change with temperature (dn/dT). The scattered light, at angles larger than a (where numerical aperture is sin α) leaves the optical path of the optical system. Some increase in the back-reflected light also may be observed. The light that is not scattered continues along the optical path having lower, “limited” power. When the incident power is reduced, the scattering volume which surrounds each absorbing particle diminishes. The transmittance through the optical-limiting solid mixture returns to its original value, and the scattering process decreases to negligible values. The process may be repeated many times without any permanent damage up to energies that are an order of magnitude or more, larger than the transmitted power limit.
Other light-scattering mechanisms may also occur simultaneously or may dominate with different choices of matrix materials or absorbing particles. These mechanisms include stimulated Raman scattering, in which light is scattered inelastically by thermally induced molecular vibrations, or stimulated Brillouin scattering, in which light is scattered inelastically by local thermally induced acoustic waves.
The light-absorbing particles are dispersed in a transparent matrix such as a monomer which is subsequently polymerized. There are many techniques for preparing such dispersions, such as with the use of dispersion and deflocculation agents added to the monomer mix. One skilled in the art of polymer and colloid science is able to prepare this material for a wide choice of particles and monomers. Similarly, techniques are well known in the art to prepare composite materials with dispersed sub-micron particles in inorganic glass matrices.
The optical power-limiting device can offer the following advantages and properties:
Some uses of the limiter may be in the optical communication area, e.g., detector protection, switch and line protection, amplifier input signal limiting and equalizing and power surge protection. Also, power regulation in networks, in the input or at the output from components. In the areas of medical, military and laser machining, an optical power limiter may be used for surge protection and safety applications. If used as a protective device in an imaging system, the limiter will work at the image point where there appears a bright light or a laser source and limit the amount of incoming light from this source without interfering with the rest of the image.
The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully understood.
With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
In the drawings:
a is a cross-sectional view of two waveguide sections and an optical-limiting solid mixture constituting an optical power-limiting device according to the present invention.
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
b is an end elevation of the structure of
a is a cross-sectional view of an optical-limiting solid mixture placed in the core of a waveguide or optical fiber in which the interface to the optical-limiting solid mixture is at an angle to eliminate back reflection.
b is an end elevation of the structure of
In the limiter configuration and operation illustrated in
The light that is not scattered continues along the optical path and has lower, “limited” power. When the incident power is reduced, the scattering volume, which surrounds each absorbing particle, diminishes. The transmission through the optical-limiting solid mixture 10 returns to its original value, as the scattering process decreases to negligible values. The process may be repeated many times without any permanent damage up to energies that are an order of magnitude or more, larger than the transmitted power limit. When the power is more than an order of magnitude larger than the threshold, the limiter turns permanently opaque thus protecting the components following it from permanent damage.
a and 4b illustrate a cross-sectional view of a bare-fiber, V-groove encapsulated optical power-limiting device. Here the input fiber 2 and the output fiber are affixed in a V-grooved optical bench 28 having two optional spacers 30 to define the inter-fiber distance. The optical-limiting solid mixture 10 is placed in the gap created by the spacers. Alternatively, the space between the fibers may be aligned with the use of a microscope without the use of spacers.
a and 5b illustrate a cross-sectional view of the bare-fiber, V-groove-encapsulated, angled, optical power-limiting device. Here the input fiber 2 and the output fiber are affixed in a V-grooved optical bench 28 having a spacer 30 to define the inter fiber distance. The optical-limiting solid mixture 10 is placed in the gap created by the spacer; this space is at an angle β, eliminating back reflections into the core.
a and 6b illustrate a cross-sectional view of bare-fiber ferrule or guiding tube-encapsulated optical, power-limiting device. Here the input fiber 2 and the output fiber are affixed in a ferrule or guiding tube 32 having a spacer 30 to define the inter-fiber distance. The optical-limiting solid mixture 10 is placed in the gap created by the spacer through the side hole.
a and 7b illustrate a cross-sectional view of the bare-fiber, ferrule or guiding-tube-encapsulated 1, angled, optical power-limiting device. Here the input fiber 2 and the output fiber are affixed in a ferrule or guiding tube 32 having a spacer to define the inter-fiber distance. The optical-limiting solid mixture 10 is placed in the gap created by the spacer; this space is at an angle β that eliminates back reflections into the core.
This limiter turns permanently opaque when exposed to powers of 30±1 dBm, which is close to 20 dB (two orders of magnitude) above the threshold power.
a and 12b illustrate the mechanism of protection via optical limiting of the embodiment of
a and 13b illustrate yet another embodiment in which the optical-limiting solid mixture 10 is used for the core material of a waveguide or optical fiber part 56. The light scattered at a large angle 12 is not propagated down the fiber. This embodiment has the advantage that the absorbed heat is distributed over a large volume, and that it has no insertion loss due to the gap between the fibers or waveguides.
a and 14b illustrate the embodiment of
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
147554 | Jan 2002 | IL | national |
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of PCT Application No. PCT/IL 03/00017 filed Jan. 6, 2003, which claims priority from Israel Patent Application No. 147554 filed on Jan. 10, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3891302 | Dabby et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3914464 | Thomasson et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4732449 | Fan | Mar 1988 | A |
4733931 | Fan | Mar 1988 | A |
4890075 | Pohlmann et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4925514 | Okada et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933929 | Tajima | Jun 1990 | A |
5017769 | Cohn et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023139 | Birnboim et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5113476 | Okada et al. | May 1992 | A |
5157537 | Rosenblatt | Oct 1992 | A |
5172278 | Tutt | Dec 1992 | A |
5173811 | Gumbs | Dec 1992 | A |
5252256 | Tutt et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5280169 | Honey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287424 | Sheem et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5337183 | Rosenblatt | Aug 1994 | A |
5341238 | Trost et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347395 | Lautenschlager et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5391329 | Dougherty et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5472777 | Kineri et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5530780 | Ohsawa | Jun 1996 | A |
5542017 | Koike | Jul 1996 | A |
5580932 | Koike | Dec 1996 | A |
5619600 | Pohl | Apr 1997 | A |
5633974 | Chia | May 1997 | A |
5651085 | Chia | Jul 1997 | A |
5689595 | Pan | Nov 1997 | A |
5741442 | McBranch et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5805326 | Snow et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5881200 | Burt | Mar 1999 | A |
6181848 | Bruno et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218658 | Taneda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6278821 | Carberry et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6384960 | Andrieux et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6466707 | Dawes et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487339 | Nishikawa | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6611640 | LoCasclo et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6690871 | Lee et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710366 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6888994 | Baumberg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
20010021292 | Merkel | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020024752 | Ando et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034747 | Bruchez et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045675 | Halas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020132045 | Halas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160195 | Halas et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186921 | Schumacher et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187347 | Halas et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010987 | Banin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031438 | Kambe et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050058415 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 325 431 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 783 117 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 943 954 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 122 564 | Aug 2001 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Yang et al. “Probing interface properties of nanocomposites by third-order nonlinear optics,” 1996, Appl. Phys. A 62, 403-415. |
Liete et al., Appl. Phys. Lett 10, 100 (1967). |
A Review of Optical Limiting Mechanisms and Devices Using Organics, Fullerenes, Semiconductors and Other Materials, Tutt et al., Prog. Quant. Electr., col. 17, pp. 299-338 (1993). |
Designing Plastics Optics: New Applications Emerging for Optical Glass Substitutes, Tribastone, et al., The Photonics Design and Applications Handbook, pp. H-454-H-460 (1997). |
Liete et al., Applied Physics Letter, vol. 10, No. 3, 100-101 (1967). |
A Review of Optical Limiting Mechanisms and Devices Using Organics, Fullerenes, Semiconductors and Other Materials, Tutt et al., Progress in Quantum Electronics, col. 17, pp. 299-338 (1993). |
International Search Report dated Dec. 9, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080279231 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IL03/00017 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 10398859 | US |