The present specification generally relates to locking mechanisms and, more specifically, optical lock systems utilizing multilayer photonic structures.
Mechanical locking apparatuses are commonly used to secure the operation of systems or to prevent access to objects. Locking apparatuses may cooperate with a corresponding key to transition between a locked and an unlocked position. The transition between a locked and an unlocked position, or vice versa, may actuate other mechanisms. For example, a vehicle ignition system often requires a key to be manually inserted into a locking apparatus. If the key corresponds to the locking apparatus, the key may be turned to commence a sequence of events which result in the ignition of an internal combustion engine. In another example, a locking apparatus and a corresponding key are often used to prevent access through a door. When the corresponding key is inserted into the locking apparatus the door may be locked or unlocked by a twisting motion.
However, such locking apparatuses are susceptible to mechanical failure mechanisms that prevent the insertion and/or rotation of a key, e.g. ice, rust or fatigue. Furthermore, mechanical locking apparatuses often require a discrete amount of manual dexterity and coordination to insert and rotate the key. The strength and coordination may prevent users such as those suffering from arthritis from operating the locking apparatus.
Accordingly, multilayer photonic structures which operate as a key in a locking system may be desirable and alternative systems and methods for optical locking utilizing multilayer photonic structures are needed.
In one embodiment, an optical lock system may include: an electronic control unit including a processor for executing machine readable instructions and an electronic memory; a lock housing including a lock chamber; and an optical key including a multilayer photonic structure. The multilayer photonic structure produces a unique intensity profile and includes a plurality of coating layers of high index dielectric material having an index of refraction nH and a plurality of coating layers of low index dielectric material having an index of refraction nL. A light source may be optically coupled to the lock chamber and communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit. The light source may transmit a reference light to the multilayer photonic structure when the optical key is disposed within the lock chamber. A photo detector may be optically coupled to the lock chamber and communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit. The photo detector may receive an interaction light from the multilayer photonic structure when the optical key is disposed within the lock chamber and may transmit the unique intensity profile of the multilayer photonic structure to the electronic control unit. A lock actuator may be communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit. The electronic control unit may execute the machine readable instructions to: compare the unique intensity profile to an electronic master; and cause the lock actuator to transition from a first state to a second state when the unique intensity profile corresponds to the electronic master.
In another embodiment, an optical lock system may include: a multilayer photonic structure including a plurality of coating layers of high index dielectric material having an index of refraction nH and a plurality of coating layers of low index dielectric material having an index of refraction nL. A light path, including a reference light and an interaction light, may transmit the reference light to the multilayer photonic structure. The reference light may interact with the multilayer photonic structure to produce the interaction light. The interaction light may be received by a photo detector. An electronic control unit, including a processor for executing machine readable instructions and an electronic memory, may be communicatively coupled to the light source and the photo detector. The electronic control unit may execute the machine readable instructions to: receive an intensity profile indicative of the interaction light from the photo detector; quantize a magnitude of the intensity profile at a wavelength; and compare a quantized magnitude to an electronic master stored in the electronic memory.
In yet another embodiment, a method for operating an optical lock may include: transmitting a reference light to a multilayer photonic structure tuned to produce a unique intensity profile, wherein the unique intensity profile is a reflectance profile, a transmittance profile, or a combination thereof. The method may also include: detecting the unique intensity profile; comparing the unique intensity profile to an electronic master; and activating a lock actuator to transition the optical lock from a first state to a second state when the unique intensity profile corresponds to the electronic master.
These and additional features provided by the embodiments described herein will be more fully understood in view of the following detailed description, in conjunction with the drawings.
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative and exemplary in nature and not intended to limit the subject matter defined by the claims. The following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments can be understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
In describing the optical lock systems of the present disclosure, reference will be made to light incident on the multilayer photonic structure. The term “light” as used herein refers to various wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum, particularly wavelengths in the ultraviolet (UV), infrared (IR), and visible portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the electronic control unit 10 comprises a processor 12 for executing machine readable instructions and an electronic memory 14. The processor 12 may be an integrated circuit, a microchip, a computer or any other computing device capable of reading and executing machine readable instructions. The electronic memory 14 may be RAM, ROM, a flash memory, a hard drive, or any device capable of storing machine readable instructions. In the embodiments described herein, the processor 12 and the electronic memory 14 are integral with the electronic control unit 10. However, it is noted that the electronic control unit 10, the processor 12 and the electronic memory 14 may be discrete components communicatively coupled to one another such as, for example, modules distributed throughout the optical lock system 100 without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, it is noted that the embodiments described herein may comprise multiple processors and/or memories that cooperate to perform the operations of the electronic control unit 10.
Still referring to
As shown in
Referring now to
It is noted that while specific embodiments of the optical key have been described herein, any permutation of an optical key comprising a multilayer photonic structure 30, a mounting surface 52, a mounting aperture 54, an opaque substrate 136 and/or a transparent substrate 236 may be utilized without departing from the present disclosure. Additionally, as used herein, the term “opaque” means a material that is substantially impenetrable to light, and the term “transparent” means a material that transmits substantially all of the light incident upon the material.
Referring again to
For example, a transfer matrix method may be employed to solve a system of equations that model the intensity profile of a multilayer photonic structure 30. In one embodiment, the intensity profile is dependent on: the angle of light incident on the structure (e.g., the angle of incidence), the degree of light polarization, the wavelength(s) of interest, the thicknesses tj of each layer of the multilayer photonic structure 30 and the indices of refraction of the high and low index materials, the transmission medium, and the incidence medium. The transfer matrix method may be implemented with a computer comprising software programmed to receive various inputs from a user related to the properties of a particular multilayer photonic structure 30 and determine an intensity profile. Such software may be referred to as a photonics calculator.
The thickness t1, t2, . . . , tk, tk+1, . . . , tx+y of each of the layers may be determined by comparing an intensity profile calculated by the photonics calculator with a desired intensity profile. Specifically, an optimization or curve fitting process may operate in conjunction with the photonics calculator. In one embodiment, the sum of the squared difference between the intensity profile calculated by the photonics calculator and desired intensity profile is minimized. The least squares fitting may be performed by an optimizer implemented with computer software executed on a computer system. While particular methods of modeling and optimizing a multilayer photonic structure 30 are described herein, it should be understood that the embodiments described herein may be modeled and optimized by any method capable of tuning a multilayer photonic structure 30 to produce a desired intensity profile.
The multilayer photonic structure 30 may also be tuned by selecting the appropriate high index material nH and low index material nL. In one embodiment, the values for nL and nH are selected such that the values are the same as commonly available materials. For example, the value of nL may be selected to be 1.46 while the value for nH may be selected to be 2.29 such that the values of nL and nH approximate the indices of refraction for silica (SiO2, index of refraction 1.46) and titania (TiO2, index of refraction 2.36), respectively. Accordingly, a multi-layer photonic structure design which utilizes 1.46 and 2.29 for nL and nH, respectively, may be constructed from silica and titania or other materials having the same or similar indices of refraction. It should be understood that other values for nL and nH may be selected which correspond to the indices of refraction of other materials. Table 1, shown below, contains a non-exclusive list of possible materials and their corresponding indices of refraction which may be utilized in the multi-layer photonic structures described herein.
For example, the multilayer photonic structure 30 may be tuned by selecting a high index material nH, a low index material nL, and a desired intensity profile. In one embodiment, an initial solution of the thickness t1, t2, . . . , tk, tk+1, . . . , tx+y of each of the layers is set to a quarter wavelength of the of the wavelength of a peak (or maxima) of the desired intensity profile. Beginning with the initial solution, the optimizer iteratively compares the output intensity profile from the photonics calculator to the desired intensity profile. Based on such a comparison, the optimizer supplies a subsequent solution that is used by the photonics calculator to produce a subsequent output intensity profile. The solving and comparison steps are repeated until the output intensity profile converges upon the desired intensity profile. Another embodiment may utilize a random number generator to generate the initial solution. A further embodiment may provide a different initial solution for different subsets of the layer. For example, an intensity profile may comprise three maxima at three different wavelengths. The multilayer photonic structure 30 may then be divided into three sections such that the layers of each section have an initial solution thickness based on the quarter wavelength of one of the maxima, i.e. the layers of section one start with an initial solution thickness corresponding to one maxima, the layers of section two start with an initial solution thickness corresponding to another maxima, and the layers of section three start with an initial solution thickness corresponding to a further maxima.
The intensity profile may be a reflectance profile, a transmittance profile or a combination thereof. Reflectance, as used herein, refers to the fraction or percentage of light incident on the multilayer photonic structure 30 which is reflected by the multilayer photonic structure 30 and may be plotted as a function of the wavelength of light incident on the structure. Transmittance, as used herein, refers to the fraction or percentage of light incident on the multilayer photonic structure 30 which is transmitted or passed through the multilayer photonic structure 30 and may be plotted as a function of the wavelength of light incident on the structure.
While specific embodiments of the methods for identifying an article of manufacture described herein utilize a tuned reflectance and/or transmittance to produce an intensity profile, it should be understood that the methods described herein may, in the alternative, utilize absorptance for producing an intensity profile. Absorptance, as used herein, refers to the fraction or percentage of light incident on the multilayer photonic structure which is neither reflected nor transmitted and may be determined from the reflectance and the transmittance. Therefore, embodiments of the unique intensity profile may comprise a reflectance, a transmittance, an absorptance, or any combination thereof, as will be described in more detail herein.
Referring again to
In one embodiment, the optical lock system 100 comprises a photo detector 28 communicatively coupled to the electronic control unit 10. The photo detector 28 can receive an interaction light 64 from the multilayer photonic structure 30 and transmit an intensity profile indicative of the interaction light 64 to the electronic control unit 10. As used herein, the phrase “photo detector” means a device that measures light intensity across a desired spectral bandwidth such as, for example, an optical detector, a light dependent resistor, a photodiode, a phototube and the like.
Still referring to
Referring now to
Referring collectively to
One practical consideration that may limit the number of permissible peaks within an intensity profile is the desired full width at half maximum (FWHM). The FWHM is the wavelength interval over which the magnitude of the intensity profile is equal to or greater than one half of the magnitude of the maximum intensity. The number of intensity profile peaks is inversely related to the FWHM, i.e. for larger FWHM the number of peaks will be decreased and for smaller FWHM the number of peaks will be increased. For example, in an embodiment with a FWHM of about 100 nm, depicted in
In one embodiment, the intensity profile may be digitized to a collection of digits corresponding to a discrete sampling of the peaks of the intensity profile. For example, referring to
In further embodiments, the alphanumeric digits may be based on a quantization of one of the reflectance peaks 70, 72, 74, 76, 78 of a reflectance profile. For example, four threshold levels of 25% reflectance, 50% reflectance, 75% reflectance, and 100% reflectance are depicted in
In another embodiment, as schematically depicted in
Further embodiments for obtaining an intensity profile comprising one or more reflectances, one or more transmittances, and/or combinations thereof are depicted in
Referring now to
In addition to measuring reflectance in a monostatic arrangement, the embodiments described herein may be configured to measure multiple intensity profiles. In one embodiment, depicted in
In another embodiment, depicted in
In a further embodiment, depicted in
Referring again to
It should now be understood that the optical lock systems described herein may be utilized to transition an actuator between multiple states. For example, one embodiment of the system may be utilized to operate an ignition of a vehicle. A lock housing comprising a lock chamber may be installed in the interior of a vehicle and operatively coupled to an engine of the vehicle. When an optical key including a multilayer photonic structure is inserted through an aperture into the lock chamber, an intensity profile is generated by optically coupling a light source with the multilayer photonic structure. The intensity profile is detected by a photo detector and communicated to an electronic control unit. The electronic control unit compares the intensity profile to an electronic master. If the intensity profile matches then the electronic control unit causes a non-ignited engine to ignite through electrical and/or mechanical actuation.
Similarly, when the optical key including a multilayer photonic structure is removed from the lock chamber, no intensity profile will be generated. The lack of an intensity profile is detected by a photo detector and communicated to an electronic control unit. The electronic control unit causes an ignited engine to transition to a non-ignited, i.e., stop running, through electrical and/or mechanical actuation Therefore, the optical properties of the multilayer photonic structure may be utilized in a manner analogous to a key in a vehicle ignition system.
It is noted that the terms “substantially” and “about” may be utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation. These terms are also utilized herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.
While particular embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be understood that various other changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, although various aspects of the claimed subject matter have been described herein, such aspects need not be utilized in combination. It is therefore intended that the appended claims cover all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3247392 | Thelen | Apr 1966 | A |
3769515 | Clark, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3885408 | Clark, Jr. | May 1975 | A |
3910681 | Elliott et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4079605 | Bartels | Mar 1978 | A |
4449126 | Pekker | May 1984 | A |
4525028 | Dorschner | Jun 1985 | A |
4556599 | Sato et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4643518 | Taniguchi | Feb 1987 | A |
4673914 | Lee | Jun 1987 | A |
4714308 | Sawamura et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4868559 | Pinnow | Sep 1989 | A |
5007710 | Nakajima et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5043593 | Tsutsumi et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5132661 | Pinnow | Jul 1992 | A |
5138468 | Barbanell | Aug 1992 | A |
5245329 | Gokcebay | Sep 1993 | A |
5279657 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283431 | Rhine | Feb 1994 | A |
5323416 | Bhat et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5491470 | Veligdan | Feb 1996 | A |
5543665 | Demarco | Aug 1996 | A |
5561420 | Kleefeldt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5653792 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5691844 | Oguchi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5850309 | Shirai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5889603 | Roddy et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6049419 | Wheatley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055079 | Hagans et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6130780 | Joannopoulos et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156115 | Pfaff et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180025 | Schoenfeld et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6387457 | Jiang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399228 | Simpson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433931 | Fink et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6565770 | Mayer et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574383 | Erchak et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618149 | Stirton | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624945 | Fan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6667095 | Wheatley et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6873393 | Ma | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6887526 | Arit et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6894838 | Mizrahi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903873 | Joannopoulos et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6927900 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6997981 | Coombs et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7098257 | Rink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7123416 | Erdogan et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7141297 | Condo et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7184133 | Coombs et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190524 | Grawert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215473 | Fleming | May 2007 | B2 |
7267386 | Hesch | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7367690 | Chen | May 2008 | B2 |
7367691 | Lin | May 2008 | B2 |
7410685 | Rosenberger et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7446142 | Meisenburg et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7483212 | Cho et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7903339 | Banerjee et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20010022151 | Sliwinski et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020129739 | Yanagimoto et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030059549 | Morrow et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040047055 | Mizrahi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040156984 | Vitt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179267 | Moon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040246477 | Moon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263983 | Acree | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050126441 | Skelhorn | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050235714 | Lindstrom | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060030656 | Tarng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060081858 | Lin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060159922 | O'Keefe | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060222592 | Burda | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070221097 | Tarng et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090046368 | Banerjee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082659 | Ham et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090153953 | Banerjee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090303044 | Furuichi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100208338 | Banerjee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209593 | Banerjee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000329933 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2005144925 | Jun 2005 | JP |
WO02054030 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO03062871 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120036905 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |