The present disclosure relates to optical communication.
Optical modulators have a variety of applications, for example, in signal processing, optical communication, and radio frequency (RF) communication. Conventional electro-optic modulators have an optical modulation transfer function that is inherently nonlinear, which limits the spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) of such modulators. Another conventional approach uses direct modulation of the optical intensity of a laser, but chirp and inefficient power handling are typically drawbacks to this approach.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure.
An optical modulator with linear response is disclosed herein. This modulator offers improved spurious free dynamic range as compared to conventional approaches. The linear response is achieved by phase modulating the output of an injection locked slave laser, or modulating the resonance of an injection locked slave laser, and combining the modulated output with the injection source signal from the master laser. In some embodiments, the phase is modulated in an arcsine fashion by tuning the cavity resonance of the slave laser. In some embodiments, the slave laser resides in one arm of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In some embodiments, the injection locked slave laser is a vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL), and a static phase shift is introduced at the output of the VCSEL by detuning the resonant frequency from the injection frequency.
The resulting optical signal 160 is transmitted over an optical network 170 to the receiver 140. A demodulator 180 performs demodulation on the received optical signal 160, then supplies the resulting recovered data 185 to the other communication device 120. The recovered data 185 contains the same information as the original data 145.
Although the modulator 150, the demodulator 180, and the optical network 170 process signals in the optical domain, some embodiments of the transmitter 130 and the receiver 140 operate at least partially in the electrical domain, such that the data 145 and the recovered data 185 are represented by electrical and/or electronic signals rather than optical signals. Although the optical modulator with linear response 150 is shown in
The unmodulated optical signal 230 is injected into the slave laser 220. The slave laser 220 phase modulates its laser output in accordance with the data 145 to produce a modulated optical signal 240. The phase of the modulated optical signal 240 varies in an arcsine manner. This behavior can be seen in
where ω1 is the injected signal frequency, ω0 is the slave cavity resonance frequency, and ωm is half of the locking range 310 of the slave laser 220. Thus, tuning the cavity resonance of the slave laser 220 results in modulating the phase of the slave laser's output in an arcsine manner.
Returning to
which can be reduced to Equation 3:
As can be seen from Equation 3, the combined optical signal 260 is directly proportional to the input signal 230 that is provided by the master laser 210. Thus, the optical modulator with linear response 150 has a linear optical modulation transfer function. This linearity leads to increased spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) as compared to conventional electro-optic modulators, which have an inherent nonlinear optical modulation transfer function. Phase modulating by modulating a detuning between the cavity resonance of the slave laser and the master laser thus produces improved transmission characteristics.
The MZ interferometer 410 combines the phase modulated optical signal 240 from the arm containing the slave laser 420 with the unmodulated optical signal 230 passing through from a second arm 460 of the interferometer 410. As described above in connection with
The combination of this phase modulated optical signal 240 with the unmodulated optical signal 230 is a combined optical signal 260. As described above in connection with
(Equation 3 from above).
An optical phase shifter 470 is located in the second arm 460 of the interferometer 410, in order to adjust the differential phase of the interferometer 410 to π/2. As also described above in connection with
The VCSEL 510 is coupled to a first arm 535 of the interferometer 410 through an optical circulator 540, such that the VCSEL 510 receives input from the master laser 210 and the VCSEL output exits the interferometer 410. A variable optical attenuator 545 controls the amount of optical power from the master laser 210 that is injected into the VCSEL 510. The ratio of injected power to output power by the VCSEL 510 affects the locking range of the VCSEL 510. An optical phase shifter 550 is located in a second arm 555 of the interferometer 410 in order to adjust the differential phase of the interferometer 410 to π/2.
The interferometer 410 combines the phase modulated optical output 560 of the VCSEL 510 with the unmodulated optical signal 565 from the master laser 210. As noted earlier, modulating the current of the injection-locked VCSEL 510 results in an arcsine modulation of the input signal 565 according to the AC modulated current signal 530. This arcsine shift is given by Δφ=arcsin(f(t)) (Equation 4), where f(t) corresponds to the AC modulation signal 515.
Combining this arcsine modulated signal 560 with the phase-adjusted signal 570 (i.e., the unmodulated signal in quadrature) produces a combined optical signal 575 which has a linear optical modulation transfer function. The example embodiment of
The foregoing disclosure as been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The disclosure is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Various modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The implementations discussed, however, were chosen and described to illustrate the principles of the disclosure and their practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the disclosure in various implementations and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the disclosure as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly and legally entitled.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application 61/240,724, filed Sep. 9, 2009, the entirety of which is incorporated herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US10/23306 | 2/5/2010 | WO | 00 | 5/25/2012 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61240724 | Sep 2009 | US |