1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to spectrometers, and more specifically to optical multi-pass cells for use in long path-length spectrometers.
2. Background Information
Long path-length spectrometers may be used to make highly sensitive and precise measurements of a wide variety of gaseous molecules. In a basic configuration, a long path length spectrometer includes a light source (e.g., a laser), a multi-pass cell and a detector. The light source directs a beam into the multi-pass cell, in which a gaseous sample is disposed. The beam is repeatedly reflected within the multi-pass cell, where it may interact with the gaseous sample and be partially absorbed. By repeatedly reflecting the beam, the multi-pass cell increases the optical path length through the gaseous sample, thereby increasing absorption. A remaining portion of the beam emerges from the multi-pass cell and is detected by the light detector. A computer system may control the light source to change the wavelength or other characteristics of the beam, and receive and analyze signals from the light detector. To measure an absorption line for a gaseous molecule, the computer system may cause the light source to linearly scan over the line, and use the light detector to observe the direct absorption shape, or it may cause the light source to sinusoidally modulate, and analyze the signal from the light detector in terms of harmonic content. In practice, the configuration of long path-length spectrometers tends to be more complicated than this basic example, including other features such as multiple light sources (e.g., lasers), a reference cell, a power-nominalization path, etc. However, the general principles are similar.
For some measurement problems, for example where concentrations of the gaseous molecule are low and/or line strength is weak, the use of a multi-pass cell may be key to achieving desired detection limits. A variety of different types of multi-pass cells have been deployed over the years, including White cells, Herriott cells, and Astigmatic Herriott cells, among others. While the specific operation of these cells differs, they each produce a series of reflections between opposing mirrors that may be characterized as a spot pattern on the mirrors (herein sometime referred to simply as the “pattern”). In each of these types of multi-pass cells, a beam enters the multi-pass cell, circulates about the cell for a definite number of reflections according to the pattern, and then exits the cell. The mirrors may serve to repeatedly refocus the beam to keep it from spreading indefinitely.
White cells were the first multi-pass cells to be widely used in spectroscopy.
The Herriott cell is a newer, somewhat simpler design than the White cell, that does not require a split mirror.
In one variant of a Herriott cell, referred to as an astigmatic Herriott cell, the front mirror and the back mirror each have two different radii of curvature (e.g., have a toric surface). The astigmatic Herriott cell produces a pattern of spots which nearly fills in the area of circular mirrors (essentially a Lissajuos pattern). The number of reflections may be changed by a combination of mirror twist and spacing between the front mirror and back mirror.
While existing multi-pass cells, such as White cells, Herriott cells and Astigmatic Herriott cells, have been used successfully to conduct innumerable measurements, there are areas in which their performance may be further improved. For example, some existing multi-pass cells (e.g., astigmatic Herriott cells) utilize mirrors whose surfaces are complex and thereby expensive to produce. Similarly, some existing multi-pass cells have lower than desired optical throughput, while others may have patterns that do not fully fill the available surface area of the mirrors, resulting an inefficient use of the cell's volume. Further, some existing multi-pass cells do not provide a simple mechanism for adjusting the number of reflections.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved multi-pass cell for long path-length spectrometers that may address some or all of these shortcomings.
In one embodiment, an improved multi-pass cell for a long path-length spectrometer includes a perturbing mirror that causes a base pattern of reflections (e.g., a Herriott cell pattern) to be repeated multiple times, where each subsequent base pattern is rotated about an axis of the cell at an angle from a prior base pattern. By circulating the base pattern multiple times, the number of reflections of the base pattern is effectively multiplied by a pattern multiplication factor.
More specifically, in one embodiment, an improved multi-pass cell may include a concave front mirror opposing a concave back mirror of equal diameter, each centered along the axis of the cell. A perturbing mirror having a smaller diameter may be centered along the axis facing the front mirror, separated from the back mirror by a perturbing mirror spacing that is generally significantly less than a spacing between the front mirror and the back mirror. In some implementations, the perturbing mirror may be located in front of the back mirror relative to the front mirror. In such implementations, the perturbing mirror may have a convex curvature. In other implementations, the perturbing mirror may be located behind the back mirror, with the back mirror having a hole therein to allow the beam to reach the perturbing mirror. In such implementations, the perturbing mirror may have a concave curvature.
A beam may be injected into and exit from the improved multi-pass cell in a variety of different ways. In one implementation, the beam may be injected through and exit from an off-axis coupling hole formed in the front mirror or the back mirror. Alternatively, the beam may be injected via, and exit via, a diverter mirror located proximate to the center of the front mirror or the back mirror. In still another alternative, the beam may be injected via, and exit via, a diverter mirror located proximate to an outer edge of the front mirror or the back mirror. A variety of other alternatives are also possible.
In one embodiment, the improved multi-pass cell may be constructed according to a setup procedure. As part of the procedure, a base pattern is selected and a base pattern shape is set. Further, a pattern multiplication factor is selected. Then the perturbing mirror spacing and a radius of curvature may be selected. In one technique, the perturbing mirror spacing may be calculated based, at least in part, on the spacing between the front mirror and the back mirror and the pattern multiplication factor. Further, the radius of curvature of the perturbing mirror may be calculated based, at least in part, on the perturbing mirror spacing, the pattern multiplication factor, and a radius of curvature of the front mirror and the back mirror. A multi-pass cell is then assembled with a perturbing mirror having the radius of curvature placed at the perturbing mirror spacing from the back mirror, wherein the radius of curvature of the perturbing mirror and the perturbing mirror spacing cause the perturbing mirror to circulate the pattern having the pattern shape according to the multiplication factor.
The improved multi-pass cell may offer a variety of advantages. For example, as a result of the design, the front mirror, the back mirror and the perturbing mirror may each be constructed as spherical mirrors, which are economical to produce. Further, high optical throughput may be provided, utilizing an overall pattern that is well matched to round mirrors, so that the cell's volume is well filled. Further, the number of passes may be readily adjusted by changing the pattern multiplication factor via axial translation of the perturbing mirror to a different perturbing mirror spacing. Alternatively, different pattern multiplication factors may be achieved by moving the perturbing mirror and the back mirror axially as a unit, while maintaining a fixed perturbing mirror spacing.
It should be understood that the example embodiments discussed in this Summary may include a variety of other features, including other features discussed below, and variations thereof. Further a variety of other example embodiments may be utilized. This Summary is intended simply as a brief introduction to the reader, and does not imply that the specific features mentioned herein are all the features of the invention, or are essential features of the invention.
The text refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Physical Arrangement and Operation
It should be understood that in alternative implementations, the off-axis coupling hole 340 may be formed in the back mirror 320. Further, it should be understood that in alternative implementations the perturbing mirror may located at a perturbing mirror spacing 335 behind the back mirror 320 and have a concave shape. In such an alternative implementation, the back mirror 320 may have a hole formed therein to expose the perturbing mirror. The front mirror 310, the back mirror 320, and the perturbing mirror 330 are each centered upon an axis 350 of the multi-pass cell 300. In the shown example, the front mirror 310 and back mirror may each share the same first diameter, with the perturbing mirror having a second, smaller diameter. However, in alternative implementations, the front and back mirrors may have unequal diameters. The front mirror 310, the back mirror 320, and the perturbing mirror 330 may each be constructed as spherical mirrors, that are generally inexpensive to produce. However, in alternative implementations, they may be constructed to have different types of surfaces.
A beam 360 from a light source (e.g., a laser) (not shown) may be injected into the improved multi-pass cell 300 via an off-axis coupling hole 340 formed in the front mirror 310. The beam 360 may be reflected according to a base pattern (e.g., a generally elliptical Herriott cell pattern) that provides a particular number of passes. At the completion of the base pattern, the beam may impact the perturbing mirror 330 which introduces a rotation about the axis 350 of the cell 300 at an angle. The base pattern may then be repeated in a rotated iteration. Successive base patterns and rotations thereof may be performed to circulated base pattern about the cell, effectively multiplying the number of passes of the base pattern by a pattern multiplication factor equal to the number of rotations. While
To change the pattern multiplication factor, and thereby adjust the number of passes achieved before the beam 360 exists the cell 300, the perturbing mirror spacing 335 may be adjusted. When the perturbing mirror 330 is translated along axis 350 to bring the perturbing mirror 330 nearly flush with the back mirror 320, the pattern multiplication factor may be reduced to 1, and the overall pattern may approximate the base pattern (e.g., a Herriott cell pattern). At a substantial perturbing mirror spacing, a substantial pattern multiplication factor (e.g., 16× or greater) may be achieved. Alternatively, the pattern multiplication factor may be changed by moving the perturbing mirror 330 and the back mirror 330 along axis 350 as a unit, thereby changing the spacing between the front mirror and the back mirror 355, while maintaining a fixed perturbing mirror spacing 335.
The cell 500 of
Paraxial Theory
The operation of the improved multi-pass cell may be understood by reference to paraxial theory. The theory may be presented as paraxial matrices, which yield circulation angles and conditions for stability for the improved multi-pass cell.
Considering first a multi-pass cell (a “base cell”) that has been adjusted so that a re-entrant condition is established (i.e. a beam injected into the cell returns to its initial state after NPo passes). In terms of paraxial matrix theory, the cell matrix is identity for the re-entrant condition. If the matrix representing one pass through the cell is C, and the matrix for N traversals is represented as CN, then for N=NPo, CN=I. A perturbing mirror may then be introduced half way through the base multi-pass cell's propagation, changing the optical path. The perturbing mirror may influence two passes of the cell, with one radius change and two space changes. The perturbed traversal, after N passes, is described by:
M=[CN/2-1P CN/2-1],
where matrix P represents the two perturbed passes. The base cell is configured so that the beam is at the back mirror after Npo/2 passes, which requires that Npo/2 be odd. With the base pattern, CN/2=±I, and the perturbed matrix, after Npo passes is given by the form, [C−1 P C−1].
The matrix for the perturbed matrix after Npo passes, [C−1 P C−1], can be viewed as a super-cycle cell, which itself may be closed after Nx repetitions. In order for the initial beam to return to its original state, NPo*Nx passes are required. Expressions for [C−1 P C−1]Nx can be used to derive an advance angle, stability and closure conditions for the super-cycle.
A paraxial ABCD matrix basis may be used. For simplicity, one transverse dimension description may be used where possible. In one case the state vector () is:
where y is position and ŷ is slope. Optical elements may be represented by 2×2 matrices which modify the state vector. Sequential multiplication by optical element matrices may represent the effect of an optical system on the initial beam state. In one example, the relevant optical elements may be:
a space,
and a reflection,
where s is the mirror spacing and rc is the mirror radius of curvature. One traversal of a cell may be represented by reflection then propagation:
For a system (M) with N traversals, M=CN. A closed expression for M=CN may be available from Sylvester's theorem, as:
where cos θ=(A+D)/2. For example, cos θ=(2− gs)/2=1−s/r. If Nθ=m 2π, for integer m, then MN=I, and the system matrix reproduces the initial beam state.
Suppose that a cell which is adjusted to the re-entrant condition has a perturbing mirror half way through the propagation, S′=S(s′), R′=R(gp). The perturbing mirror influences two passes of the cell, with one radius change and two space changes, so that:
M′=C . . . C[S′R′S′Ro]C . . . C=CN/2-1[S′R′S′Ro]CN/2-1.
Using that CN/2-1=CN/2 C−1, then M′=CN/2 C−1 [S′R′S′Ro] C−1 CN/2. With the re-entrant condition, CN/2=±I, the two CN/2 multiplications are equivalent to unity. That is:
M′=C−1[S′R′S′Ro]C−1.
Use that: C−1=[S R]−1=R−1 S−1=R(−go) S(−so), and s′=so−Sp.
For the “round trip” matrix M′, the advance angle is given by:
cos θ′=[αpp−spgo+αpoαpp]/2=[αpp+αpo−1+αpoαpp]/2.
Defining that γpp=(αpp+1)/2 and γpo=(αpo+1)/2 [γpp=1+sp/rp, γpO=1−sp/ro], then cos θ′=2γpp γpp−1. For system stability the condition that −1<cos θ′1, should be satisfied so that 0<γpp γpo<1. The range of such system stability may be shown by a stability diagram.
Geometry of Optical Paths and Setup Procedure
As discussed above, the improved multi-pass cell may replicate and rotate a base pattern of reflections (e.g., a Herriott cell pattern). A set of rings of spots are thus generated.
An improved multi-pass cell with this geometry may be constructed according to a setup procedure.
At step 920, a base pattern shape is set. Two points may determine the unperturbed pattern shape, the origin (xo, yo) and the aim-in point (x1, y1). If yo=0, the unperturbed ellipse of beam points is given by:
xj=sx sin(j θR)+cx cos(j θR); yj=sy sin(j θR),
where:
At step 930, a pattern multiplication factor is selected. For a given pattern multiplication factor Nx, there will be Nx spots in the inner ring on the front mirror, and on the perturbing mirror. Those spots should be widely spaced enough for clean coupling in and out at the front mirror. With a coupling hole radius rh, Nx hole diameters fit in a ring: Nx=π xo/rh. As such, Nx should to be consistent with the coupling hole size.
At step 940, the perturbing mirror spacing and a radius of curvature for the perturbing mirror may be selected. In one technique, system parameters may be systematically varied, and a ray tracing program used to produce maps of all possible values. The maps may change with changes in the base-pattern of the cell, and be specific to the particular choices of {x0, x1, y1}. Using the maps, useful perturbing mirror spacing and radius of curvature may be determined.
In another technique, perturbing mirror spacing may be calculated based, at least in part, on a distance between the front mirror and the back mirror and the pattern multiplication factor. Further, the radius of curvature of the perturbing mirror may be calculated based, at least in part, on the perturbing mirror spacing, the pattern multiplication factor, and a radius of curvature of the front mirror and the back mirror. For example, the perturbing mirror spacing may be calculated by the formula:
sp=(dcxo/y1)sin(π/Nx),
where xo is the origin of the x-axis, y1 is a y-axis coordinate of the aim-in point for the beam, dc is a distance between the front mirror and the back mirror, and Nx is the pattern multiplication factor. With perturbing mirror spacing determined, the stability equation discussed above may be used to determine the perturbing mirror's radius of curvature, rcp, by:
rcp=sp/[−1+(1+cos(2π/Nx))/2(1−sp/rco)],
where rco is the primary mirror radius of curvature.
At step 950, an improved multi-pass cell is assembled by placing the front mirror, placing the back mirror, and placing the perturbing mirror having the radius of curvature at the perturbing mirror spacing from the back mirror, wherein the radius of curvature of the perturbing mirror and the perturbing mirror spacing cause the perturbing mirror to circulate the pattern having the pattern shape according to the multiplication factor.
In summary, the example embodiments discussed above set forth an improved multi-pass cell for a long path-length spectrometer that includes a perturbing mirror that causes a base pattern of reflections (e.g., a Herriott cell pattern) to be repeated multiple times, where each subsequent base pattern is rotated about an axis of the cell at an angle from a prior base pattern. It should be understood that various components of the improved multi-pass cell may be modified, added to, removed, or otherwise changed depending on the implementation. In addition, it should be understood that various selections and calculations discussed above may be performed using a variety of different types of hardware, software, and combination thereof. The hardware may include a variety of types of computing systems having processors, memory chips, programmable logic circuits, application specific integrated circuits, and/or other types of components that support execution of software. The software may include executable instructions that implement applications stored in non-transitory electronic device-readable media, such as a volatile or persistent memory devices, hard-disks, or other data stores. Combinations of hardware and software may be adapted to suit different environments and applications. In general, it should be understood that the above descriptions are meant to be taken only by way of example.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3437954 | Herriott et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3550039 | Herriott | Dec 1970 | A |
5485276 | Bien et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
7307716 | Silver | Dec 2007 | B2 |
8842282 | Keller | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20060158644 | Silver | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060232772 | Silver | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20130003045 | Wilkins | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130293882 | Dottery | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140160474 | Keller | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150192468 | Pearman | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150260695 | Spartz | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Blows, J.L., et al., “Mode Characteristics of Twisted Resonators Composed of Two Cylindrical Mirrors,” Optics Express, vol. 2, No. 5, Mar. 2, 1998, pp. 184-190. |
Borysow, Jacek, et al. “Laser multipass system with interior cell configuration,” Applied Optics vol. 50, No. 30,Oct. 20, 2011, pp. 5812-5815. |
Dyroff, C. et al., “A Multipass Cell Design for Stark-Modulation Spectroscopy,” Applied Optics, vol. 46, Issue 19, Jul. 1, 2007, (26 pages). |
Engel, G.S., et al., “Precise Multipass Herriott Cell Design: Derivation of controlling design equations,” Optics Letters, vol. 32, No. 6, Mar. 15, 2007, pp. 704-706. |
Grassi, L. et al., “Theoretical and Practical Consideration of the Construction of a Zero-Geometric-loss Multiple-Pass Cell Based on the Use of Monolithic Multiple-Face Retroreflectors,” Applied Optics, vol. 40, No. 33, Nov. 20, 2001, pp. 6062-6071. |
Hu, T. A., et al. “Improved multipass optics for diode laser spectroscopy.” Review of scientific instruments, vol. 64, No. 12, Dec. 1993, pp. 3380-3383. |
Kasyutich, V.L. et al., “Multipass optical cell based upon two cylindrical mirrors for tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy.” Applied Physics, B 88, vol. 1, Jun. 1, 2007, pp. 125-130. |
McManus, J.B. et al., “Astigmatic Mirror Multipass Absorption Cells for Long-Path-Length Spectroscopy,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 18, Jun. 20, 1995, pp. 3336-3348. |
McManus, J. Barry. “Paraxial matrix description of astigmatic and cylindrical mirror resonators with twisted axes for laser spectroscopy,” Applied Optics, vol. 46, No. 4, Feb. 1, 2007, pp. 472-482. |
McManus, J.B. et al., “Dual Quantum Cascade Laser Trace Gas Instrument with Astigmatic Herriott Cell at High Pass Number,” Applied Optics, vol. 50, No. 4, Feb. 1, 2011, pp. A1-A13. |
Riedel, Jens, et al. “A simple yet effective multipass reflector for vibrational excitation in molecular beams.” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 79, No. 3, Mar. 2008 (4 pages). |
Robert, Claude, “Simple, stable, and compact multiple-reflection optical cell for very long optical paths,” Applied Optics vol. 46, No. 22, Aug. 1, 2007, pp. 5408-5418. |
Röpcke, J., et al. “Application of mid-infrared tuneable diode laser absorption spectroscopy to plasma diagnostics: a review.” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, vol. 15, No. 4, Nov. 2006, pp. S148-S168. |
Sennaroglu, A. et al., “Design criteria for Herriott-type multi-pass cavities for ultrashort pulse lasers.” Optics Express , vol. 11, No. 9, May 5, 2003, pp. 1106-1113. |
Silver, Joel A. “Simple dense-pattern optical multipass cells.” Applied optics vol. 44, No. 31, Nov. 1, 2005, pp. 6545-6556. |
Tarsitano, C.G. et al., “Multilaser Herriott cell for planetary tunable laser spectrometers,” Applied Optics, vol. 46, No. 28, Oct. 2007, pp. 6923-6935. |
Tittel, F.K., et al. “Mid-infrared laser applications in spectroscopy.” Solid-State Mid-Infrared Laser Sources, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Jun. 13, 2003, pp. 445-516. |
Werle, Peter, “A Review of Recent Advances in Semiconductor Laser Based Gas Monitors,” Spectrochimica Acta, Part A vol. 54, Feb. 1, 1998, pp. 197-236. |