1. Field
The present invention relates to optical communication equipment and, more specifically but not exclusively, to multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) signal equalization.
2. Description of the Related Art
This section introduces aspects that may help facilitate a better understanding of the invention(s). Accordingly, the statements of this section are to be read in this light and are not to be understood as admissions about what is in the prior art or what is not in the prior art.
A coherent optical-detection scheme is capable of detecting not only the amplitude of an optical signal, but also the signal's phase. These capabilities make coherent optical detection compatible with the use of spectrally efficient modulation formats, such as quadrature-amplitude modulation (QAM) and phase-shift keying (PSK) in their various forms. Compared to non-coherent optical detectors, coherent optical detectors offer relatively easy wavelength tunability, good rejection of interference from adjacent channels in wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) systems, linear transformation of the electromagnetic field into an electrical signal for effective application of modern digital-signal-processing techniques, and an opportunity to use polarization-division multiplexing (PDM).
A conventional coherent optical receiver usually includes a signal equalizer configured to reduce the adverse effects of certain transport-link impairments, such as chromatic dispersion and polarization-mode dispersion. However, the end-to-end transmission of data may cause additional impairments at the transmitter and/or the receiver. For example, the transmitter side can subject the signal to the effects of a skew between the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) signal components, radio-frequency (RF) crosstalk between the electrical signals that drive the electro-optical modulator (EOM), and an imperfect common-mode bias in the EOM. In addition, the various digital-to-analog (D/A) converters and driver circuits in the X- and Y-polarization branches of the transmitter can have noticeably different impulse responses. The receiver side can subject the signal to the effects associated with at least some of the aforementioned and/or other additional impairments. Furthermore, in an optical communication system with additional MIMO dimensions, such as a system that employs multimode fibers and space-division multiplexing, a relatively large number of additional circuit elements may introduce other types of signal impairments.
Disclosed herein are various embodiments of an optical receiver comprising an optical-to-electrical converter and a digital processor having one or more equalizer stages. The optical-to-electrical converter is configured to mix an optical input signal and an optical local-oscillator signal to generate a plurality of electrical digital measures of the optical input signal. The digital processor is configured to process the electrical digital measures to recover the data carried by the optical input signal. At least one of the equalizer stages is configured to perform signal-equalization processing in which the electrical digital measures and/or digital signals derived from the electrical digital measures are treated as linear combinations of arbitrarily coupled signals, rather than one or more pairs of 90-degree phase-locked I and Q signals. The latter feature may enable the digital processor to more-effectively mitigate the receiver-, link-, and/or transmitter-induced signal impairments, e.g. because various orthogonality-degrading effects can be mitigated at the receiver in a relatively straightforward manner.
In some embodiments, the digital processor has a carrier-recovery circuit placed between two equalizer stages. At least one of the equalizer stages comprises a plurality of equalization filters configured to operate on real-valued signals, with each equalization filter being a finite-impulse-response filter implemented using a tapped delay line or a Fourier-transform-based frequency-domain filter. Different equalization filters within the equalizer stage(s) can be connected to one another in a manner that enables the digital processor to sequentially address the various signal impairments traceable to specific hardware components in the optical-transport system, such as, without limitation, relative differences in the I and Q paths in the receiver, I/Q imbalances in each of the polarization branches in the receiver, chromatic dispersion in the fiber link, polarization rotation in the fiber link, polarization-mode dispersion in the fiber link, I/Q imbalances in each of the polarization branches in the transmitter, and relative differences in the I and Q paths in the transmitter.
According to one embodiment, provided is an apparatus comprising: an optical-to-electrical converter configured to mix an optical input signal and an optical local-oscillator signal to generate a first electrical digital measure (e.g., 1521) and a second electrical digital measure (e.g., 1522) of the optical input signal; and a digital processor configured to process the first and second electrical digital measures to recover data carried by the optical input signal. The digital processor comprises: a first equalization filter (e.g., [H11] in
According to another embodiment, provided is an apparatus comprising: an optical-to-electrical converter configured to mix an optical input signal and an optical local-oscillator signal to generate a first electrical digital measure (e.g., 1521) and a second electrical digital measure (e.g., 1522) of the optical input signal; and a digital processor configured to process the first and second electrical digital measures to recover data carried by the optical input signal. The digital processor comprises: a first equalizer stage (e.g., 7101) configured to apply respective signal-equalization processing to the first electrical digital measure and the second electrical digital measure to generate a first complex-valued digital measure (e.g., 712x); a digital circuit (e.g., 220 in
Other aspects, features, and benefits of various embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent, by way of example, from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, in which:
In one embodiment, receiver 100 may include a set of electrical low-pass filters (not explicitly shown in
O/E converter 120 implements a polarization-diversity intradyne-detection scheme using an optical local-oscillator (LO) signal 112 generated by an optical LO source 110. Polarization beam splitters (PBSs) 122a and 122b decompose signals 102 and 112, respectively, into two respective orthogonally polarized components, illustratively vertically polarized components 102v and 112v and horizontally polarized components 102h and 112h. These polarization components are then directed to an optical hybrid 126.
In optical hybrid 126, each of polarization components 102v, 112v, 102h, and 112h is split into two (attenuated) copies, e.g., using a conventional 3-dB power splitter (not explicitly shown in
Example optical hybrids that are suitable for use in optical receiver 100 are described, e.g., in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2007/0297806 and 2011/0038631, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
In a representative embodiment, DSP 160 performs (i) signal-equalization processing and (ii) carrier- and data-recovery (CDR) processing. The signal-equalization processing is directed at reducing the detrimental effects of various signal impairments, e.g., caused by circuit imperfections at the remote transmitter, linear and nonlinear forms of signal distortion in the optical transport link, and circuit imperfections in the front end of receiver 100. The CDR processing is generally directed at compensating the frequency mismatch between the carrier frequencies of optical LO signal 112 and input signal 102, reducing the effects of phase noise, and recovering the transmitted data.
Ideally, digital signals 1521-1522 represent the I and Q components, respectively, of the first PDM (e.g., X-polarized) component of the original optical communication signal generated by the remote transmitter, and digital signals 1523-1524 represent the I and Q components, respectively, of the second PDM (e.g., Y-polarized) component of that optical communication signal. However, the usually present misalignment between the principal polarization axes of the remote transmitter and the principal polarization axes of receiver 100 and polarization rotation in the optical fiber generally cause each of digital signals 1521-1524 to be a convoluted signal that has signal distortions and/or contributions from both of the original PDM components. The train of signal processing implemented in DSP 160 is generally directed at de-convolving digital signals 1521-1524 and reducing the effects of those signal distortions so that the encoded data can be recovered for output signal 162 with an acceptably low bit-error rate (BER).
Conventional signal-equalization processing treats digital signals 1521-1524 as being linear combinations of two pairs of I/Q signals, with the I and Q signals in each pair being phase-locked with respect to one another with a relative phase shift of 90 degrees. In contrast, the signal-equalization processing implemented in DSP 160 is configured to treat digital signals 1521-1524 as being linear combinations of arbitrarily coupled (e.g., not necessarily 90-degree phase-locked) signals. This feature enables DSP 160 to more-fully compensate the receiver-induced signal impairments and the link-induced signal impairments, e.g., because various orthogonality-degrading effects can now be taken into account and compensated for to a significant degree in receiver 100. In some embodiments, DSP 160 can additionally be configured to at least partially compensate the transmitter-induced signal impairments using a conceptually similar treatment of digital signals generated in the DSP after frequency-offset compensation. These capabilities of receiver 100 can advantageously be used, e.g., to relax the specification requirements to various optical devices and/or opto-electronic circuits used in the receiver, transport link, and transmitter, thereby potentially providing significant cost savings for the manufacturer and/or operator of the corresponding optical-transport system.
For example, DSP 200 can be configured to receive digital input signals that have been generated by preprocessing digital signals 1521-1524. One possible type of preprocessing is directed at adapting the rate of signal samples in digital signals 1521-1524 to a rate suitable for the signal-processing algorithms implemented in the downstream modules of DSP 200. In one embodiment, each of digital signals 1521-1524 carries a respective stream of digital samples that occur at the sampling frequency of A/D converters 150 (see
In one embodiment, DSP 200 includes an equalizer 210 configured to perform the following two functions.
First, in each time slot, equalizer 210 transforms input vector A into intermediate vector B in accordance with Eq. (1):
where bi is the i-th component of intermediate vector B, where i=1, 2, 3, 4; ak is the k-th component of input vector A, where k=1, 2, 3, 4; Hik is a respective transfer function; and the “*” symbol denotes the convolution operation. In the configuration of equalizer 210 shown in
Second, equalizer 210 transforms intermediate vector B into a pair of complex values, e.g., cx and cy, in accordance with Eqs. (2a)-(2b):
cx=b1+b2 (2a)
cy=b3+jb4 (2b)
Equalizer 210 then directs this pair of complex values, via a bus 212, to a carrier-recovery circuit 220.
In an alternative embodiment, DSP 200 may include an equalizer designed to process digital signals corresponding to a number of MIMO degrees of freedom that is different from four (as expressed by Eq. (1)), provided that the front-end circuit of the corresponding receiver is designed to generate the corresponding different number of digital signals for processing in the DSP. Representative embodiments of suitable front-end circuits are disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 8,320,769, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In one embodiment, carrier-recovery circuit 220 and error estimator 250 are configured to perform signal processing that mitigates the detrimental effects of (i) a carrier-frequency mismatch between optical LO signal 112 and input signal 102 (see
A digital signal 222 generated by carrier-recovery circuit 220 is applied to a decision circuit 230. Decision circuit 230 is configured to use the complex values conveyed by digital signal 222 to appropriately map each complex value onto a constellation point of the operative constellation and, based on said mapping, generate a digital signal 232 that carries the complex values that represent the mapped-to constellation points. A decoder circuit 240 then processes digital signal 232 to recover the corresponding encoded data for output signal 162. In one embodiment, decoder circuit 240 may perform digital processing that implements forward error correction (FEC) based on data redundancies (if any) in optical input signal 102. Many FEC methods suitable for use in decoder circuit 240 are known in the art. Several representative examples of such methods are disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,734,191, 7,574,146, 7,424,651, 7,212,741, and 6,683,855, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Copies of digital signals 222 and 232 are also provided to error estimator 250. In one embodiment, error estimator 250 is configured to estimate an error corresponding to the differences between digital signals 222 and 232. Error estimator 250 then applies a suitable (e.g., a least-mean squares, LMS, or a constant-modulus, CMA) algorithm to the estimated errors to generate feedback signals 256 and 258 for carrier-recovery circuit 220 and controller 260, respectively, in a manner that tends to minimize the error values or at least keep them below an acceptable threshold level.
Equalizer 300 comprises an array 310 of sixteen equalization filters, each marked in
Equalizer 300 further comprises real-to-complex (RIC) converters 330x and 330y configured to perform the signal transforms expressed by Eqs. (2a) and (2b), respectively.
Filter 400 is an N-tap FIR filter comprising (i) N−1 delay elements 4101-410N-1; (ii) N multipliers 4201-420N; and (iii) an adder 430. Each of delay elements 4101-410N-1 is configured to introduce a time delay T. Each of multipliers 4201-420N is configured to multiply a corresponding delayed copy of input signal 402 by a respective real-valued coefficient Cn, where i=1, 2, . . . , N. Adder 430 is configured to sum the output signals generated by multipliers 4201-420N to generate filtered output signal 432. In one embodiment, the number (N) of taps in filter 400 can be between two and twelve. In an alternative embodiment, a significantly larger number of taps, e.g., about five hundred, can similarly be used.
The values of coefficients C1-CN applied by multipliers 4201-420N can be changed over time and are set, e.g., by controller 260 via control signal 262 (see
As the name of filter 500 implies, this filter is designed to apply a frequency-dependent transfer function, H(f), in the frequency domain, where f is frequency. Accordingly, filter 500 includes a fast Fourier-transform (FFT) module 520 and an inverse-FFT (IFFT) module 540, with a transfer-function-application module (×H(f)) 530 sandwiched between these two modules. Controller 260 and control signal 262 (see
In one embodiment, filter 500 is configured to operate by repeating the sequence of operations described in the next paragraph on a set of digital values provided by input signal 502, with the set being located within a time window having M time slots and with said time window being slid forward by M−N time slots each time the sequence is completed.
A serial-to-parallel (S/P) converter 510 generates a set 512 of M digital values, e.g., by placing the digital values received via input signal 502, in the order of their arrival, into appropriate positions (lines) within set 512. FFT module 520 then applies a Fourier transform to set 512, thereby generating a set 522 of M spectral samples. Transfer-function-application module 530 applies transfer function H(f) to set 522, thereby generating a corrected set 532 of M spectral samples. IFFT module 540 applies an inverse Fourier transform to set 532, thereby generating a set 542 of M corrected digital values. A truncating module 550 truncates set 542 down to M−N digital values, e.g., by removing an appropriate number of digital values from the beginning of set 542 or from the end of set 542, or both. The result is a truncated set 552 having M−N corrected digital values. Finally, a parallel-to-serial (P/S) converter 560 serializes truncated set 552, thereby generating a corresponding segment of filtered output signal 562.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that filters 400 (
Equalizer 600 comprises an array 610 of eight equalization filters, each marked in
Also note that equalizer 600 has two parallel signal-processing branches that do not feed signals into each other. More specifically, equalizer 600 has an X-polarization branch 602x comprising equalization filters [H11], [H21], [H12], and [H22], adders 6201-6202, and R/C converter 330x. Equalizer 600 further has a Y-polarization branch 602y comprising equalization filters [H33], [H43], [H34], and [H44], adders 6203-6204, and R/C converter 330y. Branch 602x is configured to handle signals that are derived only from digital signals 1521-1522, and this branch does not handle signals derived from digital signals 1523-1524. Similarly, branch 602y is configured to handle signals that are derived only from digital signals 1523-1524, and this branch does not handle signals derived from digital signals 1521-1522. This property of branches 602x and 602y enables each of these branches to function as an independent (e.g., separate) equalizer, and either of these branches can be used as an equalizer in a polarization-insensitive optical receiver (e.g., an optical receiver that is not configured to use polarization-division multiplexing).
ECR module 700 comprises two equalizer stages 7101 and 7102, with carrier-recovery circuit 220 (also see
Each of equalizer stages 7101 and 7102 is configured to (i) receive four respective real-valued input signals, (ii) apply time- or frequency-domain equalization processing to the received signals, and (iii) generate two complex-valued output signals. More specifically, equalizer stage 7101 is configured to receive real-valued signals 1521-1524 and generate complex-valued output signals 712x and 712y. Equalizer stage 7102 is configured to receive real-valued input signals 7321-7324 and generate complex-valued output signals 222x and 222y.
In one embodiment, carrier-recovery circuit 220 is configured to generate signals 722x and 722y in accordance with Eq. (4):
where Sp(in) is a value from signal 712p; Sp(out) is a corresponding value in signal 722p; Δf is the carrier-frequency offset between optical LO signal 112 and input signal 102 (see
Signals 722x and 722y generated by carrier-recovery circuit 220 are applied to complex-to-real (C/R) converters 730x and 730y, respectively. For each complex value supplied via signal 722x, C/R converter 730x outputs the real part of the complex value via signal 7321, and the imaginary part of the complex value via signal 7322. Similarly, for each complex value supplied via signal 722y, C/R converter 730y outputs the real part of the complex value via signal 7323, and the imaginary part of the complex value via signal 7324.
In one embodiment of ECR module 700, equalizer stage 7101 is a first copy of equalizer 300, and equalizer stage 7102 is a second copy of equalizer 300, with both copies configured to receive/generate the signals indicated in
In an alternative embodiment of ECR module 700, equalizer stage 7101 is a copy of equalizer 300, and equalizer stage 7102 is a copy of equalizer 600, with both copies configured to receive/generate the signals indicated in
In yet another alternative embodiment of ECR module 700, equalizer stage 7101 is a copy of equalizer 600, and equalizer stage 7102 is a copy of equalizer 300, with both copies configured to receive/generate the signals indicated in
In yet another alternative embodiment of ECR module 700, equalizer stage 7101 is a copy of equalizer 800 shown in
In yet another alternative embodiment of ECR module 700, equalizer stage 7101 is a copy of equalizer 900 shown in
The operation of equalizer 600 has been described above in reference to
Butterfly equalizer 830 is configured to mix signals 812x and 812y, using equalization filters 8321-8324 and adders 8641 and 8642, and to convert those signals into signals 712x and 712y in accordance with Eqs. (5a) and (5b):
X′=hxx*X+hxy*Y (5a)
Y′=hyx*X+hyy*Y (5b)
where X′ is signal 712x; Y′ is signal 712y; X is signal 812x; Y is signal 812y; the “*” symbol denotes the convolution operation; and h, hxy, hyx, and hyy are the transfer functions of equalization filters 8321-8324, respectively. In operation, the individual transfer functions are set to configure butterfly equalizer 830 to perform polarization de-multiplexing. More specifically, butterfly equalizer 830 is configured to generate signals 712x and 712y so that: (i) signal 712x represents a first original PDM component generated at the remote transmitter with as little crosstalk from a second original PDM component generated at the remote transmitter as practically possible, and (ii) signal 712y represents the second original PDM component with as little crosstalk from the first PDM component as practically possible. Polarization de-multiplexing is usually used to undo, to a significant extent, the PDM-component mixing caused by (i) the usually present misalignment between the principal polarization axes of the remote transmitter and the principal polarization axes of receiver 100 and (ii) polarization rotation imposed onto optical input signal 102 in the optical fiber between the remote transmitter and receiver 100. In various embodiments, each individual equalization filter 832 can be implemented using FIR filter 400 (
In an additional alternative embodiment, equalizer 800 can be used to implement equalizer 210 (
Equalization filters EQ1q with q=1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 21, 34, and 43 are configured to operate on real values. Equalization filters EQ1q with q=X, Y, XX, XY, YX, and YY are configured to operate on complex values. In various embodiments, each individual equalization filter EQ1 can be implemented using FIR filter 400 (
In an alternative embodiment, the portion of equalizer 900 having equalization filters EQ1q with q=X, Y, XX, XY, YX, and YY and adders 9205-9206 can be removed from the equalizer structure. In other alternative embodiments, the portion of equalizer 900 having equalization filters EQ1q with q=X, Y, XX, XY, YX, and YY and adders 9205-9206 and the portion of equalizer 900 having equalization filters EQ1q with q=1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 21, 34, 43 and adders 9201-9204 can be used separately or connected to each other in a different manner than that shown in
When equalizer 900 is used as equalizer stage 7101, the equalizer's structure shown in
In an additional alternative embodiment, equalizer 900 can be used to implement equalizer 210 (
The operation of R/C converters 330x and 330y has been described above in reference to
When equalizer 1000 is used as equalizer stage 7102, the equalizer's structure shown in
While various aspects of this invention have been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense.
While numerous embodiments of equalizers and equalizer stages have been described above, various additional embodiments can be constructed using the various circuits and/or circuit components disclosed herein. For example, ECR module 700 (
Various modifications of the described embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, which are apparent to persons skilled in the art to which the invention pertains are deemed to lie within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the following claims.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, each numerical value and range should be interpreted as being approximate as if the word “about” or “approximately” preceded the value of the value or range.
It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the following claims.
Although the elements in the following method claims, if any, are recited in a particular sequence with corresponding labeling, unless the claim recitations otherwise imply a particular sequence for implementing some or all of those elements, those elements are not necessarily intended to be limited to being implemented in that particular sequence.
Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments necessarily mutually exclusive of other embodiments. The same applies to the term “implementation.”
Also for purposes of this description, the terms “couple,” “coupling,” “coupled,” “connect,” “connecting,” or “connected” refer to any manner known in the art or later developed in which energy is allowed to be transferred between two or more elements, and the interposition of one or more additional elements is contemplated, although not required. Conversely, the terms “directly coupled,” “directly connected,” etc., imply the absence of such additional elements.
The functions of the various elements shown in the figures, including any functional blocks labeled as “processors,” may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate software. When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a single dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term “processor” or “controller” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), read only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory (RAM), and non volatile storage. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also be included. Similarly, any switches shown in the figures are conceptual only. Their function may be carried out through the operation of program logic, through dedicated logic, through the interaction of program control and dedicated logic, or even manually, the particular technique being selectable by the implementer as more specifically understood from the context.
It should be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any block diagrams herein represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the invention.
The use of figure numbers and/or figure reference labels in the claims is intended to identify one or more possible embodiments of the claimed subject matter in order to facilitate the interpretation of the claims. Such use is not to be construed as necessarily limiting the scope of those claims to the embodiments shown in the corresponding figures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5049830 | Yoshida | Sep 1991 | A |
6650702 | Steele | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6683855 | Bordogna et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7212741 | Myong et a | May 2007 | B2 |
7266310 | Savory et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7315575 | Sun et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7382984 | McNicol et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7424651 | Domalgala et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7532820 | Aronson | May 2009 | B2 |
7570698 | Chimitt et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7570889 | Shastri et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574146 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606498 | Wu et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609979 | Taylor | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7734191 | Welch et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7747169 | Koc | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747177 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8050336 | Bocquet | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064544 | Li et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8320769 | Essiambre et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331805 | Nakashima et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8983309 | Harley et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020186762 | Xia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191689 | Xia et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20070110362 | Shpantzer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070206963 | Koc | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070297806 | Kaneda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080063121 | Geller et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080152361 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090142076 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100002810 | Li et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034186 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100232805 | Cai | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110002689 | Sano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110038631 | Doerr | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069975 | Liu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110129038 | Miyoshi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110217043 | Pfau | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110318021 | Zhou | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Randel, S. et al.: “Correction of a Local-Oscillator Phase Error in a Coherent Optical Receiver”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/410,747, filed Mar. 2, 2012. |
Xie, C.: “Coherent Optical Receivers for Colorless Reception”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,467, filed Jun. 29, 2012. |
Xie, C. et al.: “Colorless Coherent Receiver Using 3×3 Coupler Hybrids and Single-Ended Detection”, Optics 25 Express, 2012, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 1164-1171. |
Vangelista, Lorenzo, et al., “Efficient Implementations and Alternative Architectures for OFDM-OQAM Systems,” Transactions on Communications, IEEE, vol. 49, No. 4, Aug. 2002, pp. 664-675. |
Pfau, Timo et al., “Hardware-Efficient Coherent Digital Receiver Concept With Feedforward Carrier Recovery for M-QAM Constellations,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 27, No. 8, 2009, pp. 989-999. |
Saltzberg, Burton R., “Performance of an Efficient Parallel Data Transmission System,” Transactions on Communication Technology, IEEE, vol. 15, No. 6, 1967, pp. 805-811. |
Winzer, Peter J., et al., U.S. Patent Application entitled, “Frequency-Resolved I/Q-Signal Imbalance Correction for Coherent Optical Receivers,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,489, filed Sep. 7, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140186024 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |